Several groups are giving Dr Sherri Tenpenny a taste of the real Australian free-speech anti-Charlie Hebdo treatment. Their pens and syringes are out to get Dr Sherri Tenpenny – and stop her from speaking in Australia.
Parenthood reports that “a dangerous person is coming to Australia to spread a dangerous message“. You see, this dangerous person is Dr Tenpenny, was invited to give a series of seminars in February and March about the risks of vaccinating children.
Dr Tenpenny, an osteopath, believes the evidence indicates that vaccines cause autism, asthma, ADHD and auto-immune disorders, but she has been criticised for “endangering people’s health” and “targeting vulnerable parents”. And various groups in Australia have been mounting pressure resulting in nearly all venues cancelling her engagements. On Stop The Australian Anti-Vaccination Network facebook page they claim that only Rydges in Adelaide remains.
In fact, they claim thousands of Australians have signed a petition lobbying Canberra to deny her a visa. (Now that’s a slippery slope for the Minister)
But this was reported in Globalresearch under the heading: Why is Australia’s Vaccine Mafia Desperately Trying to Silence Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, a Brilliant Scientific Researcher?
“Australia’s vaccine zealots are the most rabid extremist wing of the vaccine medical mafia, and they’ve engaged in tactics like issuing death threats to vaccine educators to try to silence them. Now, they’re trying to get the Australian government to ban the travel visa of Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, a pro-informed-consent educator who has conducted more research into vaccine adverse effects and safety risks than almost anyone else speaking out today.
Australia’s vaccine mafia, it turns out, is absolutely terrified that citizens of Australia might learn the truth about vaccine exemptions, toxic vaccine ingredients (like mercury) and the growing global epidemic of vaccine-damaged children.”
$3 Billion Perspective
On what grounds could the Minister deny Dr Tenpenny a visa? I am sure this upstanding member of the US medical community doesn’t have a criminal record and is surely not a terrorist threat.
On the other hand you have a company operating in Australia called GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) that supplies a wide range of vaccines to the Australian public. The U.S. Dept. of Justice — which almost never goes after powerful corporations – went after GlaxoSmithKline, charging the company with felony criminal misconduct. GSK is paying a $3 billion fine while pleading guilty to felony CRIMES. Does this criminal misconduct have any influence on how the relevant Ministers view GSK Australia’s operation here?
We are not yet living in Auspharmalia.