Home 911Truth False Flags – Admissions Of Past ‘Terror’ Attacks

False Flags – Admissions Of Past ‘Terror’ Attacks


911 exploding

One of the 9/11 ‘Explosive’ events.

The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened”. This has been attributed to Josef Stalin. It however matters not who originally said it, governments are well aware of the ‘terror-effect‘ on the populous. Yesterday, Mary Maxwell wrote a piece of ‘Terrorism Defined…’ on how foolish we are to keep on letting governments use a “strategy of tension” to keep people in fear, to justify wars, and to enable the police state. The corporate media, it seems, wants to keep us ignorant of the word: False Flag.

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time. 

The most outrageous and ingenious false flag in recent times is the 9-11 event. It had the effect of a ‘New Pearl Harbor’ and created the environment for wars, resources grab, anti-liberty legislation etc. When this event will be admitted is another question.

But in this recent article (at infowars), these are 42 false flags that have been admitted.

Being from South Africa, this caught my attention:

#22 The South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that, in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him “to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the ANC for the bombing.

And this:

#34 Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

#41 The former Ukrainian security chief admits that the sniper attacks which started the Ukrainian coup were carried out in order to frame others.

#42 Britain’s spy agency has admitted (and see this) that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on targets, framing people by writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the target.


#14 As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. See the following ABC news reportthe official documents; and watch this interview with the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.

False Flags


Events like the 9-11, the London Subway 7/7 Bombings, Oklahoma City Bombing, Norway Oslo Attacks, Sandy Hook Elementary School, Aurora Colorado Batman Shooting, Port Arthur Massacre and the Boston Marathon all have the ‘signs’ of a classic false flag.

But the Australian corporate media don’t even acknowledge the word – false flag – including the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. I doubt you would find that is has been used or referred to by News Corp (the Murdoch Press) or Fairfax Media journalists.

Sharpen your pencils and complain to the editors.

2 planes 3 pencils



  1. Dee, I also noted the article recently to which you refer that is linked in your report. There are over 40 examples mentioned, and there are more, if one searches
    So Main Stream Lame Deceitfull Media: Where were you lot when the InfoWars article appeared and why was it not followed up?
    MSM Journos reading this, take Heed: You lot are a waste of space and why are you being paid?
    Ditto to our politicians…………..Sorry to interrupt you lot and distracting you from your back stabbing manouverings, rather than doing your jobs.
    BTW ; Minister ROBB; read the proposed trade agreement yet?

  2. I found it a refreshing strategy to simply refer to 9/11 as a false flag operation, without being defensive, without sensationalism; simply stating a fact. Perhaps that’s all we need – just more reference to things as they actually are, without explanation. If enough people, often enough, simply speak of 9/11 as a false flag, then it might enter the psyche of the world as a fact.

  3. Dalia, your Example #42 reminded me of Martin Place.

    You say the Brits admit writing offensive material and blaming it on the target. Allegedly, Man Haron Monis wrote insulting letters to the families of Aussie soldiers who died in Iraq (complaining that their boys had sinned in the Middle East).

    We can’t grill Man Haron Monis about this now, as he is dead, but as soon as I heard of it I knew it was a game. No one would be so self-defeating as to write in that way. It was a trap being laid for Monis, so later the public could hate him in good faith. Possibly he did put his John Hancock on the letters, but if he was an operative for ASIO, it was ASIO’s doing.

    Do you recall the item you presented from the Scottish police about a lad in Northumbria who, in a blog, made fun of Glaswegians who died when a lorry hit them? I declare that the blog was MI5’s doing. If the lad worked for them, so what. Or maybe no such lad exists and the dramatic story of his street swarming with police cars is just a scare tactic. (The message was: we ned to crack down on outrageous bloggings…)

    Would someone please make up a term for this kind of
    wrong-blaming for letters written? “Flag” isn’t appropriate, as no nation is blamed.

    Dalia, thank you so much for pointing out that the media won’t use the word false flag. Will you please write to the ABC and ask if they think it correct to say that the Reischtag fire was a false flag?

  4. How to step from knowing what’s happening, to saying “We object”? I went thru the list of 42 admitted false flags. I reckon folks would consider many of them acceptable. Indeed most people believe that whatever their nation does to faraway nations is “probably necessary.”
    Maybe we should start with the premise that aggrieved parties are the only ones who will object. Syria would naturally object that the US and UK did some killings (in 1957) and blamed them on Syrians. But what should make Aussies feel aggrieved?

    Please see my example below re Martin Place. If a letter-writing false flag was part of an overall scheme in which Tori Johnson and Katrina Dawson lost their lives (both in their thirties), shouldn’t Australians be having a fit?. It just isn’t enough for us to analyze it and note that the motivation was to justify stricter legislation (or whatever).
    Don’t we have to throw a fit? I want to see the guilty punished. The whole hostage-taking affair has harmed Australia in many ways. The piety-parroting after the siege was all about Oz unity. Good, let’s see some unity. Let’s unify against those who harm us.
    And let’s hear of ASIO trying to find out what really happened, eh? They get paid to protect us. I suspect ASIO itself to have arranged the Monis caper. But I’ll bet there’s a parent or two in ASIO’s ranks who feel angry that Katrina’s children will go through life motherless.
    Did you see Number 27 of the “admitted” items? Indonesian police helped plant the Bali bombs. Wow. Per Wikipedia: “The 2005 attack came during the school holiday period in some states of Australia, when an estimated 7,500 Australians are believed to have been visiting Bali.” Marvelous timing there. I think ASIO should get onto this right away. ABC should, too.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion