by Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB
An odd thing happened to me on Saturday, Valentine’s Day, 2015. I am an agent at Rumor Mill News, which means that I can the upload an article to that website at any hour of day or night. So I uploaded a piece called “The Credo of Genevieve Glinch: What the Typical Non-skeptic Believes in 2015.”
And who is this Genevieve Glinch person? It’s just a name I made up. She symbolizes the Silent Majority — folks who are not trying to solve the great issue of “Who did 9-11?”
Then, amazingly, the very next author who uploaded to Rumor Mill News was someone linking us to an “amateur video of 9-11.” It was made by Richard Siegel, an expert cameraman, from the pier at Hoboken, New Jersey (a few miles from Manhattan), on that famous day.
I watched all 98 minutes of it and was quite floored. It is a devastating portrait of the way in which the smoke from the fires engulfed the whole island. (Yes, I know one can fake a video. In my judgment this is not a fake.)
Had I seen this film of the Twin Towers burning, before I wrote the Genevieve Glinch essay, I’d have written differently. In my essay about Glinch’s ‘credo,’ I was very gentle. I sympathized with her inability to face uncomfortable truths. But now I am furious with her! That scene in New York was just too sickening. So I am sending her this letter, to give her a piece of my mind:
Dear Mrs Glinch (i.e., anyone in the Silent Majority),
There is a serious problem in America today. I know this is going to sound offensive, and I am sorry to offend, but YOU are the serious problem. You are preventing people from arresting the real criminals of 9-11.
It is a settled fact that members of the military participated in the 9-11 attacks. Sure, that may sound horrible to you, but it is a fact. At the very least, three persons need to be indicted: Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Cheney, and General Richard Meyers. They ‘ran the show’ in Washington DC on the day in question.
Just forget that little fairytale about Osama bin Laden, the nineteen hijackers, and all that. That was the cover story used by the real criminals to distract the public.
Mrs Glinch, you no doubt want to be respectful of government. As a child you were taught to be that way, and so was I. Besides, being well-mannered is an important part of my self-image, especially as a woman. Fine, but it should not be the controlling factor.
For exactly ten years I have been working on the problem of trying to get “the silent majority” to wake up and take action in regard to 9-11. (Prior to February 2005, I was not aware that the baddies were in the US elite. I fell for the Bin Laden story just as everyone else did.)
Mostly I have tried legal means. I ran for Congress in 2006, in New Hampshire, on the platform of “9-11 truth.” I also took Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld to court – needless to say I lost the case. I also published a book, entitled “Prosecution for Treason,” in 2011.
In short, I’ve been doing anything I could think of. Always being polite to the nth degree. But, at this point, it seems obvious to me that the reason we can’t “get at” the Bozo’s (that was my Dad’s strongest word), is that the average citizen is unwilling to do the right thing!
So filing lawsuits and authoring books is not what I need to do. I need to confront YOU with the fact that you simply must face up to the reality of 9-11. We need your help. It probably won’t be as frightening as you may think. After all we have each other! It could even be a pleasure.
What You Can Share with Your Neighbors
Mrs Glinch, even though we’ve had telephones for more than a century, and even though we bump into neighbors every day — at the busstop, at church, or wherever — we are not good at banding together. It’s a problem that won’t be instantly overcome, just because we have the urgent 9-11 issue to deal with, but any little method you can cook up for communicating with folks may be useful and will be appreciated.
I suggest that you pose to any neighbor the matter of “Mary Maxwell’s being furious.” (That’s a better ice-breaker than “Hey, let’s arrest the governor.”) You could say “I wonder if Mary is in need of medication.” Go right ahead, beat on me, I don’t mind. Do what you have to do. Then, if the neighbor inquires about “the facts” of 9-11, here is your opportunity. The thin end of the wedge!
The Facts As Expressed in the Official Story
Very briefly, here’s the story we were told. (Note: kids who today are 18 were only 7 when 9-11 happened so they don’t even know what crazy details their parents accepted as truth.) All of the following is a crock. Yes, 100% of it:
Four different flights were hijacked, two of them from Boston. Each had five Arabs on board (or in one case, had only four) armed with box cutters. Each was on a suicide mission, as there was no hope of survival. Their task was to express an Islamic, anti-Western view. (“They hate our freedoms.”) Apparently nothing further was planned, and it was all a private group, rather than an enemy state attacking the US. Amazing, what?
The official story is a combination of whatever the media reported (CNN, New York Times, etc.), plus what members of government said and what the 9-11 Commission Report wrote.
Oddly, although the event was a crime (not an act of war since no nation had declared war on us), the crime was never investigated, despite oodles of careful methodology developed by the legal profession.
A Few Examples of the Mishandling of the Case:
- The Airlines have never been asked to provide the passenger manifest or detail of the purchase of tickets by the 19 Arabs.
- Important information gleaned from experts was ignored in the Commission report, such as the fact that a steel-framed building cannot fall from fire, even the hottest fire.
- Numerous video cameras, which are always working at the Pentagon campus, were not brought into the investigation.
- The president and vice president of the US refuse to testify under oath. (Hot damn, that should be enough to decide the case right then and there!)
- When it was realized that, in the days of 2001 technology, cell phone calls couldn’t be transmitted from the heights claimed, nobody went back to question the claims of the calls.
- The media made sure never to mention the lawsuit filed by a female soldier, April Gallop, who sat near the explosion at the Pentagon and who said there was no evidence of a plane there.
Mrs Glinch, if you try to imagine how easy it was for the government to carry out the whole “terrorism attack” of 9-11,
with explosives pre-planted in those buildings, and simply have the media broadcast the story of Arab hijackers, you’ll quickly realize that our own gullibility is the problem. Pity we didn’t pay attention to the false accusation against “Timothy McVeigh” in the Oklahoma bombing, and learn a lesson.
Should Congress Have Protected Us?
Members of Congress earn $174,000 a year as their base pay, plus many allowances. What exactly is their job? Well, for one thing it is to make law. Within weeks of 9-11 they passed the Patriot Act, a flagrantly unconstitutional little exercise in treason. Moreover, they admitted at the time that they hadn’t read it.
Again, I have to blame all of us. We were scared and emotionally wrapped up in all the “togetherness” that ensues after a disaster. We trusted the legislature to do right. Note, however that they didn’t just fail us in the “heat of the moment.” They repeatedly renewed the sunset clauses of the Patriot Act in the cool, cool, cool of the evening.
I also note that in two previous cases of a false-flag attack committed by the US to start a war, Congress was informed that it had been lied to, and yet took no action against the perjurers, much less did it alter the consequent war action.
One was the false statement by President Lyndon Johnson in 1964 that a US ship had been attacked in the Gulf of Tonkin. On that basis, Congress expanded the military action in Vietnam, killing many US soldiers and Vietnamese allies. Then in 1990, a 17-year-old Kuwaiti girl baited Congress with Saddam atrocity stories, allowing Desert Storm to happen.
I bring up that history to emphasize that the legislature clearly does not mind being lied to. So, there is no reason, sad to say, to ever expect Capitol Hill to come to the rescue. (But you, Mrs Glinch, if you are age 25 or over, can run for Congress and change the whole ballgame. In fact, please do.)
Stay Away from Youtube, Sort of
Mrs Glinch, if you have never followed the 9-11 “truth movement,” I don’t encourage you to jump in at the deep end of the pool. There are more disinformational videos on Youtube than genuine ones. It can be very annoying.
Better to read the two best books, which are written by Elias Davisddon (“Hijacking America’s Mind” – I’ll say!) and Kevin Ryan (“Another Nineteen” – I can think of 30). They’ll smooth out any worries you have as to how the phone calls were made or who was in charge of Security at Dulles Airport.
But I hope you will look at the magnificent video by Richard Siegel, below. And you don’t have to trust his “theories.” Siegel’s got fantastic footage, taken with his own camera. He stood on the pier at Hoboken, which looks across to Manhattan. Plus, we hear him playing a radio the whole time, with WINS station in New York giving us a play-by-play (subsequently suppressed).
Let me tell you what I learned from the video that was new to me. I’m a dyed-in-the-wool conspiracy theorist, so it’s hard to get me excited with new data, but here is some:
- On the WINS radio, we hear a reporter say that a senior Air Force enlisted man said he saw a military-type helicopter circle the building, then disappear behind the building and then a fireball went up into the sky. (This supports the Truthers’ no-plane-at-the-Pentagon theory.)
- There were 8 helicopters visible in the sky over the WTC after the buildings were already hit. Siegel says they could have been FEMA helicopters as part of a drill. It has long been known that drills took place that day, using the very scenario that occurred – planes flying into skyscrapers! (Hello! Hello!) Note Elias Davidsson says the phone-callers such as Betty Ong may have believed they were taking part in a drill.)
- In the Siegel film, there aren’t any jets hitting the WTC. Of course, that doesn’t prove there were no planes. Ah, Mrs Glinch, I hear you say you saw the planes with your own eyes? No, you saw tricks on TV. Be wary.
- Siegel says he tried for years to tell everybody about these things and was called disloyal and “trying to stir up terrorism.”
- He said he went to the pier every day thereafter and the wind was always at his back. Thus the wind blowing into Manhattan eastward carried the debris east into Brooklyn. Verry, verrry interesting.
Mrs Glinch, please do me a favor. Just go to the end of Siegel’s long video, say the last three minutes starting at 1.37, and hear him practically weep over America’s loss of freedom and loss of reality.
I honestly think you will be moved.
— Mary W Maxwell lives in Adelaide. She is a full-time researcher, mainly in law and medical issues. Last time she got paid for her work was 1995. Please buy her book “Consider the Lilies: A Review of 18 Cures for Cancer and Their Legal Status.” Or grab it free from maryWmaxwell.com