by Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB, May 4, 2015
It’s fabulous to see the new royal baby, born two days ago to the Cambridges, looking so healthy. She will have unlimited opportunity, someday, to do what women do best – produce love.
Here is an excerpt from an interview given by the baby’s grandma, in 1995. The interviewer is Martin Bashir.
DIANA: I’ve been in a privileged position for 15 years. I’ve got tremendous knowledge about people and how to communicate. I’ve learnt that, I’ve got it, and I want to use it. And when I look at people in public life … I think the biggest disease this world suffers from in this day and age is the disease of people feeling unloved, and I know that I can give love for a minute, for half an hour, for a day, for a month, but I can give — I’m very happy to do that and I want to do that.
Interviewer: Do you think the British people are happy with you?
DIANA: I think the British people need someone in public life to give affection, to make them feel important, to support them, to give them light in their dark tunnels.
I see it as a possibly unique role, and yes, I’ve had difficulties, as everybody has witnessed over the years, but let’s now use the knowledge I’ve gathered to help other people in distress.
Interviewer: Do you think you can?
DIANA: I know I can, I know I can, yes.
These days we could use a “restoration” — we need to restore normalcy and common sense. Let’s have a quick, nostalgic look at the 1660 Restoration when the British monarchy got restored. This followed the years in which there was a civil war, an Interregnum, and a brief republic.
Although lately we speak as if only Muslims go in for beheadings, the king of England, Charles I, was decapitated in 1649.
That was by an order of Parliament, signed by 59 men. (Granted, it was not a very legitimate parliament, as many members had been forced out; the remainder were called the Rump parliament.)
In 1660, Parliament passed An Act of Free and General Pardon, Indemnity, and Oblivion. It gave amnesty to subjects who had taken part in various hostilities, since the Civil War began in 1642. However, the pardon did not extend to any who had committed regicide. Ten of them were hung for treason. (Some who had already died were exhumed and beheaded. Talk about disgusting! But I guess folks didn’t suppress their anger in those days.)
Amnesty for Port Arthur, 9-11, and Everything Else?
Dalia Mae Lachlan, the editor at Gumshoenews, has asked me to float an idea regarding 9-11. Many people have asked for new investigations, but how would that help, with governmental barriers still up? Dalia wonders if there should be a general amnesty for 9-11 wrongdoers, “as a way to start the ball rolling” to restore normalcy.
Maybe it could be run like the South African end-of-apartheid Truth and Reconciliation Commission, but by laypersons only. Sinners would have to specify what they did and show how they are going to change their ways.
I favor this, in spite of my having authored Prosecution for Treason. But folk do need to see punishment occur, too. It’s the standard way in which society establishes what is not permissible. A show trial for one or two 9-11 criminals could suffice. Fictional names, ‘John Doe’s,’ can be used.
I recall my Dad being glued to the TV in 1974 when Senator Sam Ervin was holding impeachment hearings against President Nixon. Americans had simply forgotten that the law is ABOVE any and all personnel. It was remarkable to hear Ervin simply quote the law. Magic.
(Note: for a guide to persons who could be indicted for 9-11, see Richard Ryan’s Another Nineteen, or the comprehensive website whodidit.org. And just as Sylvia Meagher used testimony that had been given to the Warren Commission, to figure out JFK’s killers, Elias Daviddson has compared all sworn testimony given to the 9-11 Commission. I feel sure he has got it down pat. You must read his book, Hijacking America’s Mind on 9-11. What a title!)
It’s Way Too Soon To Give Up on Law
Even if we remain unsure of the identity of our enemy, it still pays to concentrate on what the law has to say. Law is so powerful that it is in fact one of the main weapons the baddies use to harm us. They create legislation to thwart our powers, and they stranglehold the judges – as indeed they must, since Court is where the power of all persons (and society itself) would otherwise come through.
I say rule of law must be restored a.s.a.p.! Prof Anita Bernstein of Brooklyn Law School has written a “Manifesto for the Training of Lawyers.” She says that students may go to law school to
Prof Anita Bernstein
do good things, but “Once these entrants arrive at law school, the sense of inspiration with which they began often fades, and an inchoate pessimism, if not full-blown cynicism or depression, takes its place.”
Was I ever surprised (actually I was shocked) when, after graduating from Law School and attending a meeting of fellow newbies at the Law Society, we were handed a list of psychologists we could visit. Why? Because “new lawyers tend to be depressed!” Hey, I can think of a better solution than taking Prozac. How about restoring the love of the law that law deserves?
Please, professionals of the law, get a grip. Even if many other institutions are in need of repair, it is this one that is key. Law is the normal, irreplaceable means to constrain harmful behavior. Not doing your job here is lethal.
Please see Bill Windsor’s brilliant efforts on this matter in US. He’s riding around like a Lone Ranger, to revitalize law. (Don’t worry that he is temporarily in jail for doing so. That just shows how “dangerous” it is to tout the blessings of Rule-of-Law. Yippee!)
It Is Essential To Discuss “the Jews” Very Openly
We can’t wait any longer to deal with the treason of 9-11, but there is a stumbling block.
One hears it said (all over the Internet) that Mossad pulled off the 9-11 WTC affair. For starters, I consider that no more interesting than “the FBI did it,” or “the mafia did it.” Undoubtedly the Mossad, FBI, and mafia did do 9-11. They do all such things. They are clearly in cahoots. They are enslaved, and would probably like to be set free.
Take just the case of Mafia hit men. Can theirs possibly be an enjoyable life ? Surely not. But how can they escape?
(By the way, if you are hearing this for the first time, please know that the FBI’s involvement in the first attack on the WTC, which occurred in 1993, has been admitted to!!!)
Researcher Mae Brussell, before her death in 1988, had worked out the connections among the men who do all sorts of things: major assassinations, mind control, famines and droughts, serial killings, etc. I only found her book this year, but I had already worked out the same idea. You can’t miss these guys. They are able to control any court, any police or military. (Heck, they run the Pentagon; no way do US presidents or Congress run that.) They can suppress books. They have the media under tight wraps.
Brussell (see her on Youtube) pins down the culprits to those associated with the Nazis, including Allen Dulles, who became CIA director in 1953 (see whale.to), John McCloy, head of Chase Manhattan Bank, and the Vatican which handled the transfer of many Nazis to the US. I am not trying to say no Jews were involved. I am certain that some Jews played a big part in these things. They even played a major role in committing pogroms against Jews! Weird, but true.
Yep, I’ve read The Synagogue of Satan by AC Hitchcock and do not disagree with it as factual history. But to say that some Jews did this or that, is not to say that “the Jews” did this or that. I’m disgusted with the fact that so many people fall into the trap about Jews-and-9-11, and that this then prevents them from acting to indict anyone. See? That is how it works!
The rumor that “it’s Jews” is perhaps the big restraint on acting. I am particularly disgusted with Jewish Americans for not talking about this (other than to say silly things like “People should not be anti-semitic”). People should be anti-Semitic if there’s a good case. Show me the case. I will be rip-roaringly anti-Semitic if I see evidence that “the Jews” have caused us all such grief.
If only we could discuss these matters openly we would quickly unlock many mysteries.
They Are Tired and Want To Quit Anyway
My theory, which I won’t go into here, is that the drive toward total domination is as much biologically guided in the species Homo sapiens as it is in that of the fur seal (Recall my Gumshoe article on “Three Ways To Arrange a Society”).
But – and this is almost humorous — once the Top Dogs started to have success, they didn’t know what to do with themselves. We humans always repeat what we’ve done before, right? So these guys kept making more and more elaborate schemes, even wholly absurd ones.
They now control thousands — Fritz Springmeier says millions — of mind-controlled slaves. (See Springmeier’s interview at Henry Makow’s website.) As I said in my January 7, 2015 article on “The Devil,” they’ve even bothered to make a religious underpinning for their naughty deeds. The whole thing is so pathetic. Hadn’t we better stop standing around staring at it and start to do something about it?
I don’t think its just wish fulfillment on my part when I say the Top Dogs must be sick of the whole damn thing. It has got completely out of hand. They need a rest.
Help the Top Dogs take a rest.
–– Mary W Maxwell lives in Adelaide. Her website is prosecutionfortreason.com