Home Society People Are “Hypnotised” by The Fraud of the Political Game

People Are “Hypnotised” by The Fraud of the Political Game


We do not have a democracy in this country we have a fake one,Tina Louise Rothery (Green Party, UK) . In the video below she discusses with Richie Allen the possibility of fraud in the UK election. She also notes that “76% did not tick that box and vote for Cameron’s government.”

The western world is caught up in the politics of duopoly.

As Professor Carrol Quigley wrote in Tragedy and Hope, 1966, “The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy”.

The recent UK election was a “surprise”. If the opinion polls had proved accurate, the country would have had Ed Miliband as PM. The polls are probably a manipulation mechanism anyway, but why were the polls so far off? The last time polls were so inaccurate was in the 1992 election.

The people voted David Cameron back in. To remind you, this is what he said at the UN (below).

I wonder if it would be possible to sway elections by manipulation?

I draw your attention to Derren Brown (again). He is an English hypnotist, illusionist, mentalist, trickster, and television personality. (I am sure to create maximum effect he manipulates his shows. But essentially his subjects seem real, and I’m sure he does not want to jeopardize a lucrative career with fakery.)

In one of his programs, THE HEIST, he uses a motivational seminar (and documentary) to see if he can persuade four members of a group to steal £100,000 in what they believe is a genuine “armed robbery”.  He uses various psychological tools, including conditioning and suggestion, to create an emotional state (of invulnerability, euphoria and aggression) that are then triggered by various stimuli, such as the colour green, and the song “Can You Feel It”.

Below is Part 5 of Brown’s program demonstrating the heist and the manipulation.

This makes anything look possible through suggestive tools. I wonder if “they” have worked out how to manipulate a small percentage of the population in this manner to ensure their preferred candidate gets into office.

Richie Allen Facebook


    • Dalia, i did not invest the 28 minutes in watching the UK item, but I enjoyed Darren’s hypnosis. However, I looked him up on Wikipedia and it says he is an illusionist. What is your basis for trusting that he has really hypnotized these Manchurian Candidates? I know for sure that it can be done, but who is he to Hecubah? Who paid Central Casting for all those “extra’s”?

      • I have shown some of his work before. But he is known also for being a hypnotist but instantly re-mapping other peoples thoughts. I don’t think it is fake. I am sure he has found a way to do this. e.g. to even to famous actor Simon Pegg…. manipulating memory.
        Do you remember me posting this…

        • Glory be to God. I’ve just read the RICO prosecutiion of Whitey Bulger (big mobster in South Boston) and it says he was effed up by MK-Ultra while in the army in 1950s. So was James Earl Ray, according to his brother John in “Truth At Last.”
          This is so unfair. (Note: Ray did not really murder anyone, least of all MLK, but Bulger murdered 19 people.)
          Why are the MK-Ultra perps walking free?

          • Sorry, it was Ray who got mind-controlled while in the army, Bulger experienced it in the Atlanta Penitentiary. I quote Wiki:

            There, according to mobster Kevin Weeks, he was involved in the MK-ULTRA program, the goal of which was to research mind-control drugs for the Central Intelligence Agency, [under] CIA chemist Sidney Gottlieb. For eighteen months, Bulger and eighteen other inmates, all of whom had volunteered in return for lessened sentences, were given LSD and other drugs.
            Bulger later complained that he and the other inmates had been “recruited by deception”, and that they were told that they were helping to find “a cure for schizophrenia”. He described his experience as “nightmarish” and said it took him “to the depths of insanity.”

            Well it would, wouldn’t it.

  1. Pardonez moi, Christopher Brooks, but I had trouble reading your post on the earlier item so I have copied it to here:

    (This is from Christopher’s Facebook page.)
    Why is there a different law for a 17 year old Greenvale youth in comparison to John Howard and all who joined him in his “bomb plotting”.
    The dangerous culture of “security” secrecy and the media hype and imagination that headline “pipe bombs” and “Mothers Day” “massacre” make it impossible that genuine justice will prevail.
    What was the exact nature of the “materials associated with making explosive devices” removed from the Greenvale house?
    Was this unlicensed, isolated young man really capable of or likely to undertake the alleged “terrorism”?
    What role did covert policing activities play in the “terror plot”?
    Did the $450 million related security expenditure in the Federal Budget weigh on the Greenvale “terror raid”?
    When Australians surrender to the hype and emotion without posing questions and holding authorities to account, the creeping “Police State” will eventually gain a grip over our society that makes it a revolutionary act, just to ask a question and expect an answer.

    (This is Mary Maxwell’s reply.)

  2. In the Tina Rothery interview, it is very evident she has been shocked in some sense to discover the “election” process is such a deeply corrupted farce.
    Tina is keen to rebuild her passion, which has been bruised, and make flexible associations, which is correct in itself, but what is more important is exactly what is the root of the problem.
    She mentioned symptoms but should have a clear statement that includes “Power”, “Money”, “Deception”, “War Rackets”, “Zionism”, “Israel”, “Correct Principles of Association”, “Constitutionalism”, “Sorcery and Propaganda”, “Critical Thinking” and the need for a non negotiable transparent and accountable political reality.
    If the life we understand and believe is possible, is under attack, she must identify the enemy.
    How can it otherwise be defeated?
    Ed Miliband certainly had no real answers, yet many of those who did not vote for Cameron, believe he did offer a better alternative. .
    At least the focus remains on Cameron and the distracting blame game of changing teams is avoided.
    UKIP has some stirring qualities but does appear to be acting as another false hope.
    The foundation of any recovery against the forces of monopoly will only be possible if it is rooted in quality honest education, producing a fully dynamic understanding of the present situation and all the possible options, including the correct methods, strategies required for human beings, in association, to incarnate desired results.
    The Monopoly power has a money printing press to buy a reality that protects and preserves the present common consciousness, which is why that problem is a critical priority.

    Tina didn’t communicate any of this important information.

    The Brits must find or produce intellectual leaders who have a political explanation that makes sense, and an alternative plan that is irresistible and inspirational.

    Can anyone nominate a British intellectual, with some public profile, that has the education, charisma and courage that fits the bill?

    We have the same problem in Australia.

    The cult of personality is always to be feared, but humans must incarnate the word into flesh, and one firm lesson of history is that leadership matters.

      • Mary, my list was not exclusive, just inclusive of the subject matter that is commonly absent from the next great “revolutionary movement” that gathers, excites, exhausts and then disappoints when desired results are corrupted and perverted by the usual tricky science.
        When the train you board arrives back where you began and you were thinking it was taking you to another destination it should be cause to consider what when wrong before we are convinced to board another.
        This is not what happens but we must account that the operators of the show have got it down to a perfected science.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion