Home Australia The Health Contradiction That Politicians Ignore – Reported Vaccine Side Effects

The Health Contradiction That Politicians Ignore – Reported Vaccine Side Effects

2

22

Reported in Investmentwatchblog: “If Vaccines don’t cause Autism why is it a side effect listed on the package insert with the FDA!”

Here is a clear measure of medical insanity and the threat it represents to the health and life of your children: UK authorities are considering giving the pertussis vaccine to newborns, even though there are no safety studies to support vaccination of newborns.

Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) and autism are listed on the pertussis vaccine package insert (filed with the FDA) under serious adverse events reported during post-approval use. ‘Events were included in this list because of the seriousness or frequency of reporting.’

On page 11 of the FDA pdf

In Australia, the Immunisation Australia Program suggests…

the DTPa-containing (diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis) vaccine is the best way to reduce the risk of whooping cough in children. It is recommended as part of routine childhood immunisation, as a combination vaccine which is free on the National Immunisation Program Schedule. Doses of vaccine are given at two, four and six months of age, with booster doses at four years and 10-15 years.

The article above was also posted on Rumormillnews.

So I was wondered this morning… as there was news about the christening of Princes Charlotte on television.

charlotte

Is the Princess up to date with her vaccines?

She should be. She was “Gifted With Vaccines From Canadian Government”. The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s daughter was on the receiving end of a lot of presents, but this one, as UK Lifestyle writes (13/5/15), “is without a doubt the most useful”. To honour her birth, the Canadian government made a $100,000 donation to pro-vaccine group Immunize Canada.

Maybe Mary Maxwell can explain the legal process of legislative malice. I am about to read her new book, FRAUD UPON THE COURT.

There is the argument that we need to keep the “herd” safe, but what happens when a government legislates financial and other punishments to force parents to inject their children with substances that have known and reported severe adverse side effects? Is this “assault” on the child if something goes wrong?

 

 

2 COMMENTS

  1. “….why is a side affect [autism] not listed…”
    Ask; the Prime Minister Mr Abbott, our shock jocks and the editor’s of the Daily Telegraph in Sydney.
    Seems that the doctors have a duty of care to read out the warnings to the parent/s before injecting, so that the parent/s (and guradians) has/have an opportunity to research the substance being injected and the possible affects as it could be a lifelong sentence ahead.
    Any medical practitioner who does not read out the warnings could be classed as negligent.
    There is a hell of a lot to research beyond the Daily Telegraph.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion