Home 911Truth Chilling Similarities Between Port Arthur Massacre and 9/11

Chilling Similarities Between Port Arthur Massacre and 9/11

11

9-11 tasmania

A quick glance at the modus operandi of the false flags.

by Dee McLachlan

1. Predictive Language 

There will never be uniform Gun Laws in Australia until we see a massacre somewhere in Tasmania“, said Barry Unsworth, NSW Premier, December, 1987 at a conference in Hobart.

Their envisioned transformation would take a long time “absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” That is what the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a neocon think tank (with included people like George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz), wrote.

2. Advance Removal of Important People 

On the Sunday morning, two hours before the Port Arthur massacre, it is alleged that ten of the senior managers of Port Arthur were taken (to safety) many miles away for a two day seminar with a vague agenda and no visiting speakers. (here)

Many people were warned not to travel, or stay away on September 11. Susan Lindauer (a CIA asset) recounts that she was told to stay away from New York. Some survived because of appointments (e.g. Larry Silverstein’s dermatologist appointment), and two workers got emails warning them to not go into work two hours before the attack. Ann Tatlock, the CEO of Fiduciary Trust Co. International was at Warren Buffett “golf charity event” at Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha (where the President landed up).

3. Important People and Press Close by

Much of the media is based in the vibrant city of New York. But there were other important people there at the time – even the Australian Prime Minister John Howard and Israeli’s Benjamin Netanyahu (Note – Netanyahu was also in London when the bombings happened there).

700 reporters from 17 nations came to a seminar in the remote city of Hobart. It is alleged they were asked to arrive over the week-end as the seminar was due to begin early on Monday.

4. Preparations

A big Mortuary Truck, a specially-built 22 person capacity mortuary truck was built – for Tasmania – the quiet island of little violence. It attracted derision before it was used at Port Arthur. Also 25 specialist doctors (Royal Australian College of Surgeons) from all over Australia attended a training course in Hobart. It is alleged their last lecture was on Terrorist Attack and Gunshot Wounds.

In New York, FEMA teams arrived the night before the 9/11 attacks. Pier 92 was selected as a command center (not the bunker in Bld 7) for a drill that had been planned.

 

5. Decoy

Just before the shootings the only two policemen in the region were called away to a distant Coal Mine at Salt Water River, to investigate a heroin drug stash – which turned out to be soap powder.

Jet fighters were removed from patrolling the US east coast and sent to Alaska and Canada in the Operation Northern Vigilance drill.

6. Miraculous Experts

Hijackers, hopeless pilots, miraculously became expert aviators, not only hitting both towers – but smashed the computers that were investigating the missing $2.3 Trillion dollars in the Pentagon.

Martin Bryant (IQ of 66) miraculously turned into an extraordinary pro-shooter. Within 15 seconds, he fired 17 shots, killing 12 people and injuring 10.

7. Confusion

Operation Vigilant Guardian was an exercise simulating hijacked planes in the north eastern sector and started to coincide with 9/11. Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins, NORAD unit’s airborne control and warning officer, was quoted as saying “It must be part of the exercise.” The numerous drills on the morning of 9/11 deliberately distracted NORAD so that the real hijacked planes couldn’t be intercepted in time.

It is alleged that Wendy Scurr and others attended to the injured without any police protection for six hours. The police apparently stopped at Tarana to have a barbecue (?) and other police boats were a close distance from the main crime scene.

8. Evidence Tampering

Tampering of evidence at cafe. (correction after Terry’s comments below)

The authorities disposed of the buildings, and did not bother to test for explosives.

9. The Media Created Immediate Culprits.

The Hobart Mercury (illegally) printed pictures (a week old) of Martin Bryant on the front page before some of the witnesses had not yet been asked to identify the killer in the cafe.

papers bryant

People like Paul Bremer appeared on television and pointed to Bin Laden within hours of the attack. Bremer talks about Bin Laden – but fails to mention that his offices were hit by a plane. Nor does he show concern to hundreds of his associates that are in the towers.

 

10. Laws

Both events brought in new laws.

 

 

 

11 COMMENTS

  1. The inhumanity and cruelty of some, (including hypocritical politicians and mass media journalists) in government has no boundaries.
    Bryant sits in solitary probably going madder for nearly 20 years and KSM who allegedly claimed to have planned and done 9/11 “from A to Z’ has been imprisoned in GB and water tortured up to 83 times in one month ,(?) for the last ten years without a trial……………..if he ever gets a fair civil trial.
    It is really going past the stage that, being seen in the same retaurant as one of our politicians is an embarrassment.

  2. “Police fail to take DNA samples and finger prints for Bryant from the cafe.” – Uh, that’s not correctly worded.

    They admit doing DNA testing on the contents of the Blue Bag and not surprisingly found Bryant’s DNA on his personal knife that was in the bag.

    However, the food tray that the killer ate from had prints and DNA of the killer. So here’s where it gets interesting. They published a photo on the evening news of a similar tray sitting on a table in a pristine clean and orderly restaurant – an obviously bogus photo shopped picture. It raised a few eyebrows at the time, like what the Hell was that about?

    It apparently was to be used as ‘disinformation’ if someone asked about the tray in the restaurant – that is, they already had a guilty mind and were creating a false trail of inquiry for the tray at an early stage.

    Then, some four weeks after the massacre, they resorted to the bodgy photo ID as they had no physical evidence of Bryant in the restaurant (gee, maybe the tray got lost in the chaos and they couldn’t find it) – NOPE!

    Years later we got the video tape of the ‘Police Eyes Only’ tape from inside the restaurant after the massacre. All the bodies are still in situ – not very pleasant viewing. As the camera pans around, there is the table with the blue bag of planted evidence and the food tray right next to it (and the dead Asian bloke right behind it). The food tray was perfectly preserved with the yellow can of Solo, drink cup, utensils, plate and of course the tray.

    As further evidence of a guilty mind, they reworked the statement of Rebecca McKenna (who had been eating at the same table as the killer, and who wasn’t wearing gloves) to say that she saw the tray falling out of the killers hands as he entered the Cafe’ (they were trying to GET RID OF THE TRAY!). She caught what they did to her statement and wrote in the margin, saw it tipping, not falling.

    Here’s a dirty secret of the prosecution. If there is any ‘exculpating evidence’ the prosecutor is duty bound to give the evidence to the defence. A lab report of the tray saying that the person eating from the tray was not Martin Bryant would be such exculpating evidence. So, the lab report would have to go ‘missing’. However, if anyone saw a picture of the tray in the restaurant, they would naturally ask for the lab report on the tray – So, not only did the lab report have to go ‘missing’, but any evidence of the existence of the tray also had to go missing.

    With all that Mens Rea of a guilty mind – You can bet your last dollar, that the lab report on the tray showed that Martin Bryant wasn’t the person who ate from the tray.

      • What about the High Jacking that triggered the Vigilant Guardian
        Exercise? Or did you forget there was a plane to high jack a plane overseas, fill it with explosives and dirty bomb material, and fly it to the USA?
        NORAD usually only scrambled, when an incoming flight approached from outside US airspace, or when asked by air traffic control.
        Nice biased story with little substance!

  3. Funny how when the subject of 911 arises the whole tone and volume of commentary changes. Its almost as though people are working to an agenda. Little test Dalia. mention five dancing Eskimos somewhere and see if the site crashes.

  4. First thing in an investigation is ” you have to start with the past ” is total nonsense and he knows it ( Bremmer ) . The first thing is to collect the evidence and analyze the evidence and ever kid knows that from TV . But if you have a script to push or narrative to misdirect the people , you pre judge an event to create a boogie man , based on no evidence .

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion