I have corresponded via email with several Gumshoe “commentors” (the Spark Plugs) who have tried to dissuade me from challenging the official story of the collapses. In one exchange, one commentor seemed to disclose that he knew what happened (great news). I have below sampled a few extracts that challenged photographs I sent (His English is good considering it is his second language):
“Eggars was wrong on pancaking, what occured was a funnel effect with compression waves triggering spark plug like events igniting dust and other energetic materials.
…floor slabs are unlikely to be catipulted out, they may have under gone a sliding board effect that could have redirected them…
Steel was flipped or catapulted out,
…drywall expelled from the core by the 800+ mile an hour winds generated…
Can I say that what I know definitely occured on 9/11, no that would require more experimentation, can I say it might be weaponizeable by terrorists, yes possibly so…. (and) What I know is of no real value except too those who might want to harm or injure innocent people, as such it can not Be publicly released.
I have challenged any of those original “commentors” to write their thesis for publication on Gumshoe.
Meanwhile a new booklet, produced by Architects and Engineers of 911Truth is now available. Link to the 50 page booklet here. It provides an overview of the evidence regarding the World Trade Center destruction and is a starting point for those who are new to the subject.
Is their hypotheses correct? It does not matter. All that is required, is to prove the official theory as an impossibility.