by Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB
This is a sequel to my September 28, 2015 article entitled “Are Humans Evil? If So, Why?” It covered the psychopathic type that Andrew Lobaczewski has written about. He says: you can find some men at the top of a nation who possess no conscience and who experience no remorse. Two of the psychopaths he named were Stalin and Hitler. But men in top office like that can’t perform all their evil stuff singlehanded. They need many helpers.
Not All the Contributors Are at the Top
In this article I look around at evil things that are occurring, and which emanate from a legislature or a court, or from doctors. They are official policies. Whilst it’s likely that they really originate from a hidden World Government, how is it that ordinary “nice” people, such as politicians or judges, rubber-stamp those policies?
Even if someday we are able to confirm that an evil thing (such as the 9-11 Inside Job) was the brainchild of psychopaths, that won’t tell us all we need to know. There aren’t enough individuals who are clinical psychopaths to have carried out all the peripheral work! Other persons are apparently serving the psychopaths, and many of these have moral sensibility; they have a conscience. What a puzzling situation!
When you note the evils I identify below, you’ll label me a conspiracy theorist. Well, fine, I gladly accept that designation. Conspiracies have to occur because there are men who have risen to the top of the hierarchy and now have to spend a lot of time fending off challengers. Any student of evolutionary biology knows that this is what happens in species that have alpha’s.
Our current human alpha’s are burdened with the task of cover-up. They are constantly hunting down anyone who gets wise to them – as they have committed so many terrible crimes.
My question is: Why doesn’t the professional class resist the fantastically awful fate that is planned for us all? Granted not every person knows about the conspiracies, but many do.
(When I was running for Congress, I was about to enter the debate room with my opponent, Paul Hodes. I said “Paul, save yourself a whole step; just say you accept that 9-11 was an inside job, as you surely know it was.” He replied “I’m not going to go there.” Note: he did not say “Mary, you are off your rocker – 9-11 was done by Arab hijackers.”)
Two Samples of Conspiracy
I offer two conspiracies, so we can analyze the behavior of the rubber-stampers.
The first is a plan to bring on the police state. This is done by many pieces of legislation (usually ‘anti-terrorism’ laws) and by decisions in court cases that uphold these unconstitutional laws.
The second is a plan to harm people’s health by vaccines. Note: some will say right away that any harm would be a side effect of an otherwise well-intended plan to benefit human health. Let me give you four clues that this isn’t correct; the harm is deliberate. And plenty of rubber-stampers know it.
- We hear that many doctors do not allow their own kids to be vaccinated. This goes against the claim that doctors consider vaccines to be wonderful.
- The government and the media blatantly lied, re the “naughty behavior” of Dr Andrew Wakefield. His behavior was in fact responsible and adhered to the standards of science.
- Many parents report ridicule or hostility from medical professionals when they express concern about a scheduled vaccination. This is a sure sign something is amiss. Doctors and nurses would normally listen to such doubts respectfully.
- Congress created a new courtto handle vaccine-injury claims when ordinary courts were perfectly suitable. In doing so, Congress provided ways to hide the damage being done to children.
It especially hides the fact that autism often follows a vaccine. See followingvaccinations.com for reports by a thousand mothers. I picked this one at random:
Allison Chapman. Developmental all ahead until 15 month MMR, [measles, mumps, rubella shot] 48 hours later 105 fever, stopped sleeping, screaming in GI pain, explosive toxic smelling stool, new food intolerances, staring episodes, 3 days later full body rash, physical symptoms persisted development started levelling until 18 month DTP [diphtheria tetanus pertussis shot] /IA polio next day stopped imitating sister, avoiding father, no eye contact from strangers, speech disappearing, by 2yrs everything was gone, autism diagnosed immediately because of regression.
So What Is Going On?
I think you will agree that some legislators, judges, doctors, and journalists are doing some of the bad things of which I accuse them (re police state and harmful vaccines). Why do they do this and not the opposite? That is, why are they rubber-stampers when logic would predict that they would be resisters or protestors?
We can sort the rubber-stampers into groups:
First, those who are gung-ho the plan to harm people. I will call these “baddies.” Maybe they work closely with World Government big-wigs. (I assume that only a very few of the rubber-stampers are in such a high-up group.)
Second, those who have never heard a colleague speak of conspiratorial-type things. They use their default option and ride the status quo. Let’s call them “the innocents.” (How many in this group? Wild guess: 35%)
Third, those who have heard what’s going on and who do realize that the thing they are about to rubber-stamp is dangerous and bad. The problem is, they don’t want to stick out. They are “scaredy-cats.” They fear being attacked or even losing their next promotion, so they “go along to get along.” (Is this group a majority of the rubber stampers? Yes, probably).
Do you think that accounts for the whole lot? A coterie of baddies, a neutral crew of innocents, and a phalanx of scaredy-cats? I think there is another group. I will call them “the mind-controlled professionals.”
My reason for not simply calling them “the mind controlled” is that that term conjures up members of an unimpressive social class. I specify “the mind-c0ntrolled professionals” to suggest that even very educated and well-paid people may be operating under instructions directly to their brain. Doctors and judges are not exempt from the depredations of some Tavistock-like manipulator.
Even if you do not agree with me that this is taking place, you have to admit that it’s within the realm of possibility. I will give two examples:
In the US Army, some soldiers in battle wear “the helmet of obedience.” A man may be driving a tank and, with the great noise of battlefield explosions, he would not be able to hear directions radioed in to his tank by the commander. So – in some cases – he has agreed to wear a helmet that sends messages directly to his brain. If the message is “turn left,” his motor cortex makes it happen – without him consciously deciding to turn left!
The other example is a billboard that is used in Oxford Street, London, outside of a shop. It calls out a subliminal message to passersby. “Buy Lancome’s new perfume” (for example) – and in you go to buy it, without knowing why. This is not sci-fi. The technology for this kind of mind control has been well-publicized.
I do not claim to know how the doctors, legislators, journalists, or judges would receive their instructions.
Actually, I think doctors are given a general form of mind control in medical school that simply instructs them to follow orthodoxy. My guess is that it’s like hypnosis. They are put into some kind of gullible mindset, and then are fed the holy doctrine. It would thus be possible to stop a doctor from “thinking through” the vaccine issue.
I’ll grant this does not explain why some pediatricians omit vaccination for their own offspring. That puzzles me. I hope it does not mean that the doctors really do know vaccines are bad, and yet willingly foist them on other people’s offspring.
Judges, too, may be given a central rule: go along with precedent. That could explain the contemporary obedience of nearly every state and federal judge, in regard to the coming police state. But any glance through old law journals will show that even a minor controversy about a legal principle brings great minds to the fore. Not any more!
What happened? I do not know. I am going to bet a little money that the judges have been got at, mentally, in some way. I am fond of pointing out that the judge in the Martin Bryant case and the judge in the Marathon bombing case acted in a way that is simply out of the ballpark compared to what we expect of a judge. (Note: those judges are not feeling the anger of the public, as people tend to trust them and have been bamboozled by media. The lack of moral pressure on them could be a contributing factor. But that’s another story.)
The Recruiting of Legislators
Back now to my opening premise: there are psychopaths at the top, running a ‘World Government’ and all the while folks think their parliamentarians are making the decisions. I believe the psychopaths control most governments in the world. How is it done?
The psychopaths could possibly do it by ‘parachuting’ only one or two of their commanders into the legislature, and somehow set the culture there. Thanks to the system of two dominant parties, there’s an added advantage to that parachuter. He can sway his side of the chamber to do A, or B, or C, on the grounds that it is needed as a way of diminishing the strength of the ‘enemy.’
I don’t neglect the importance of the two standard means of persuasion: bribery and intimidation. But I’m still querying the logic: if a legislator knows a policy is really awful and will harm the whole society — including himself! — why would he rubber-stamp it? He could say “No way, Jose.”
Here is my best answer for now. I think the process by which a citizen steps forward and seeks office is not as spontaneous as we have assumed. I think most parliamentarians in Oz, and most Congresspersons in the US, were sought out because they are the obedient type, or the unthinking type.
When I stepped forward to campaign, in 2006, I was offered the chance – while still only a candidate – to go to a sort of retreat and get “training.” Needless to say I declined — especially when I was told that they would teach me how to answer questions. (Picture it, if you will!)
Dear Reader, the bottom line is that you need to stand for parliament. Don’t let the chambers be filled with Yes-persons.
If you’ve still got control of your neurons, cherish them and use them.
This is serious business.
— Mary W Maxwell lives in South Australia, and can be contacted at maryWmaxwell.com. She is the author of “Fraud Upon the Court,” and co-author with Dee McLachlan of – wait for it – “Truth in Journalism.