Home Society Who Helps the Psychopaths Run the World?

Who Helps the Psychopaths Run the World?

18

planet-earth-from-space

by Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB

This is a sequel to my September 28, 2015 article entitled “Are Humans Evil? If So, Why?”  It covered the psychopathic type that Andrew Lobaczewski has written about. He says: you can find some men at the top of a nation who possess no conscience and who experience no remorse. Two of the psychopaths he named were Stalin and Hitler. But men in top office like that can’t perform all their evil stuff singlehanded. They need many helpers.

Not All the Contributors Are at the Top

In this article I look around at evil things that are occurring, and which emanate from a legislature or a court, or from doctors. They are official policies. Whilst it’s likely that they really originate from a hidden World Government, how is it that ordinary “nice” people, such as politicians or judges, rubber-stamp those policies?

Even if someday we are able to confirm that an evil thing (such as the 9-11 Inside Job) was the brainchild of psychopaths, that won’t tell us all we need to know. There aren’t enough individuals who are clinical psychopaths to have carried out all the peripheral work! Other persons are apparently serving the psychopaths, and many of these have moral sensibility; they have a conscience. What a puzzling situation!

When you note the evils I identify below, you’ll label me a conspiracy theorist. Well, fine, I gladly accept that designation. Conspiracies have to occur because there are men who have risen to the top of the hierarchy and now have to spend a lot of time fending off challengers. Any student of evolutionary biology knows that this is what happens in species that have alpha’s.

Our current human alpha’s are burdened with the task of cover-up. They are constantly hunting down anyone who gets wise to them – as they have committed so many terrible crimes.

My question is: Why doesn’t the professional class resist the fantastically awful fate that is planned for us all? Granted not every person knows about the conspiracies, but many do.

(When I was running for Congress, I was about to enter the debate room with my opponent, Paul Hodes. I said “Paul, save yourself a whole step; just say you accept that 9-11 was an inside job, as you surely know it was.” He replied “I’m not going to go there.” Note: he did not say “Mary, you are off your rocker – 9-11 was done by Arab hijackers.”)

Two Samples of Conspiracy

I offer two conspiracies, so we can analyze the behavior of the rubber-stampers.

The first is a plan to bring on the police state. This is done by many pieces of legislation (usually ‘anti-terrorism’ laws) and by decisions in court cases that uphold these unconstitutional laws.

The second is a plan to harm people’s health by vaccines. Note: some will say right away that any harm would be a side effect of an otherwise well-intended plan to benefit human health. Let me give you four clues that this isn’t correct; the harm is deliberate. And plenty of rubber-stampers know it.

  • We hear that many doctors do not allow their own kids to be vaccinated. This goes against the claim that doctors consider vaccines to be wonderful.
  • The government and the media blatantly lied, re the “naughty behavior” of Dr Andrew Wakefield. His behavior was in fact responsible and adhered to the standards of science.
  • Many parents report ridicule or hostility from medical professionals when they express concern about a scheduled vaccination. This is a sure sign something is amiss. Doctors and nurses would normally listen to such doubts respectfully.
  • Congress created a new courtto handle vaccine-injury claims when ordinary courts were perfectly suitable. In doing so, Congress provided ways to hide the damage being done to children.

It especially hides the fact that autism often follows a vaccine. See followingvaccinations.com for reports by a thousand mothers. I picked this one at random:

Allison Chapman.  Developmental all ahead until 15 month MMR, [measles, mumps, rubella shot] 48 hours later 105 fever, stopped sleeping, screaming in GI pain, explosive toxic smelling stool, new food intolerances, staring episodes, 3 days later full body rash, physical symptoms persisted development started levelling until 18 month DTP [diphtheria tetanus pertussis shot] /IA polio next day stopped imitating sister, avoiding father, no eye contact from strangers, speech disappearing, by 2yrs everything was gone, autism diagnosed immediately because of regression.

So What Is Going On?

I think you will agree that some legislators, judges, doctors, and journalists are doing some of the bad things of which I accuse them (re police state and harmful vaccines). Why do they do this and not the opposite? That is, why are they rubber-stampers when logic would predict that they would be resisters or protestors?

We can sort the rubber-stampers into groups:

First, those who are gung-ho the plan to harm people. I will call these “baddies.” Maybe they work closely with World Government big-wigs. (I assume that only a very few of the rubber-stampers are in such a high-up group.)

Second, those who have never heard a colleague speak of conspiratorial-type things. They use their default option and ride the status quo. Let’s call them “the innocents.” (How many in this group? Wild guess: 35%)

Third, those who have heard what’s going on and who do realize that the thing they are about to rubber-stamp is dangerous and bad.  The problem is, they don’t want to stick out. They are “scaredy-cats.” They fear being attacked or even losing their next promotion, so they “go along to get along.”  (Is this group a majority of the rubber stampers? Yes, probably).

Do you think that accounts for the whole lot? A coterie of baddies, a neutral crew of innocents, and a phalanx of scaredy-cats? I think there is another group. I will call them “the mind-controlled professionals.”

Mind Control

My reason for not simply calling them “the mind controlled” is that that term conjures up members of an unimpressive social class.  I specify “the mind-c0ntrolled professionals” to suggest that even very educated and well-paid people may be operating under instructions directly to their brain. Doctors and judges are not exempt from the depredations of some Tavistock-like manipulator.

Even if you do not agree with me that this is taking place, you have to admit that it’s within the realm of possibility. I will give two examples:

In the US Army, some soldiers in battle wear “the helmet of obedience.” A man may be driving a tank and, with the great noise of battlefield explosions, he would not be able to hear directions radioed in to his tank by the commander. So – in some cases – he has agreed to wear a helmet that sends messages directly to his brain. If the message is “turn left,” his motor cortex makes it happen – without him consciously deciding to turn left!

The other example is a billboard that is used in Oxford Street, London, outside of a shop. It calls out a subliminal message to passersby. “Buy Lancome’s new perfume” (for example) – and in you go to buy it, without knowing why. This is not sci-fi. The technology for this kind of mind control has been well-publicized.

HAARP20l (1)

Mind-Controlled Professionals

I do not claim to know how the doctors, legislators, journalists, or judges would receive their instructions.

Actually, I think doctors are given a general form of mind control in medical school that simply instructs them to follow orthodoxy. My guess is that it’s like hypnosis. They are put into some kind of gullible mindset, and then are fed the holy doctrine. It would thus be possible to stop a doctor from “thinking through” the vaccine issue.

I’ll grant this does not explain why some pediatricians omit vaccination for their own offspring. That puzzles me. I hope it does not mean that the doctors really do know vaccines are bad, and yet willingly foist them on other people’s offspring.

Judges, too, may be given a central rule: go along with precedent. That could explain the contemporary obedience of nearly every state and federal judge, in regard to the coming police state. But any glance through old law journals will show that even a minor controversy about a legal principle brings great minds to the fore. Not any more!

What happened? I do not know. I am going to bet a little money that the judges have been got at, mentally, in some way. I am fond of pointing out that the judge in the Martin Bryant case and the judge in the Marathon bombing case acted in a way that is simply out of the ballpark compared to what we expect of a judge. (Note: those judges are not feeling the anger of the public, as people tend to trust them and have been bamboozled by media. The lack of moral pressure on them could be a contributing factor. But that’s another story.)

The Recruiting of Legislators

Back now to my opening premise: there are psychopaths at the top, running a ‘World Government’ and all the while folks think their parliamentarians are making the decisions. I believe the psychopaths control most governments in the world. How is it done?

The psychopaths could possibly do it by ‘parachuting only one or two of their commanders into the legislature, and somehow set the culture there. Thanks to the system of two dominant parties, there’s an added advantage to that parachuter. He can sway his side of the chamber to do A, or B, or C, on the grounds that it is needed as a way of diminishing the strength of the ‘enemy.’

I don’t neglect the importance of the two standard means of persuasion: bribery and intimidation. But I’m still querying the logic: if a legislator knows a policy is really awful and will harm the whole society — including himself! — why would he rubber-stamp it? He could say “No way, Jose.”

Here is my best answer for now. I think the process by which a citizen steps forward and seeks office is not as spontaneous as we have assumed. I think most parliamentarians in Oz, and most Congresspersons in the US, were sought out because they are the obedient type, or the unthinking type.

When I stepped forward to campaign, in 2006, I was offered the chance – while still only a candidate – to go to a sort of retreat and get “training.” Needless to say I declined — especially when I was told that they would teach me how to answer questions. (Picture it, if you will!)

Dear Reader, the bottom line is that you need to stand for parliament. Don’t let the chambers be filled with Yes-persons.

If you’ve still got control of your neurons, cherish them and use them.

This is serious business.

— Mary W Maxwell lives in South Australia, and can be contacted at maryWmaxwell.com. She is the author of “Fraud Upon the Court,” and co-author with Dee McLachlan of – wait for it – “Truth in Journalism.

 

18 COMMENTS

    • Fredrick, thanks for the Leuchter interview link.

      Have you paid any attention to the “Rebekah Roth” issues and do you have any insight into it’s significance and purpose.

      A notable aspect is her very strong linking together of some dimensions of the Jewish identity octopus yet her “Methodical Illusions” theories are part flimsy hypothesis and when challenged or questioned she behaves quite bizarrely, threatening to walk out of interviews and she believes all those who do not accept her total theory should be ignored or declared irrelevant because “she has solved the 9/11 crime”.

      The incredible lesson is the interview approach of the “alternative media” who on the whole have not examined her thesis and seem oblivious that there is nothing new in all the contradictions and puzzles surrounding the 9/11 crime that she dramatically announces as if the information is new.

      Rebekah Roth just leaps to her particular “belief” and “interpretation” of the information falsely claiming she has solved the issues though almost in the same sentences she will be conceding she is guessing.

      It’s a fascinating and dangerous potion she brews.

      I confess It is difficult to evaluate all the transgressions of logic, contradictions of purpose, all mixed with her unstable attitude.

      She is a highly skilled operator as long as she is in control.
      The cracks appear when proper scrutiny is applied.
      I am certain there will be some fascinating and surprising twists and a fairly predictable denouements in good time.

    • Dear Readers of Gumshoe,
      It would be nice if we could collect a number of suggestions as to What To Do.
      I don’t mean what to do about vaccines, or the Leuchter report, or any particular issue. Rather, what to do about the fact that ordinary people are quietly supporting the psychopaths, to their own — and our — risk.
      Anything positive you could suggest would be welcome. Feel free to use a screen name.
      Take my Aunt Edith as an example. (I don’t actually have an aunt Edith.) Ol’ Edie means well. She would never condone what the psychopaths are getting up to. But she believes whatever is reported by mainstream media..
      Or take my Cousin Mike, a dentist. He is “able to live with this stuff,” as he considers that the normal response. He looks upon me as “too far out.”
      How can we demand that Edie and Mike carry their weight?

      • I’ll just quote my innocent mother many years ago when I suggested that a pain killer she was taking could be dangerous: “but they wouldn’t put it out if it was dangerous would they?”

          • Paul, this brings us back to Rabbi Rubenstein’s point in my previous article (“Are Humans Evil?”). He finds it dangerous — and I do, too — that we do not have “Daddy” up there to protect us. He did not exactly say Daddy. I am referring to government, or as I posted above, charities such as “Amnesty International.”
            On the one hand, I want to tell people to stop beliving in these Daddy’s who are not acting like a good parent. On the other hand, I don’t want to say “We don’t need to believe in helpers.” Yes we do. Evolution prepared us to turn to real parents for help.
            What do you recommend?

          • Did man create God to take the place of those lost/absent Daddys? Does this God need go-betweens (Popes, Queens etc) who also help themselves to the Daddy role in the curious, ongoing absence of said God? There’s an argument for another day.

  1. An excellent question that since 2001, coinciding with my own realising that everything we were told re 911 is a lie, I have been saddened and amazed at the fact that literally thousands of our fellow citizens, would have participated in, or been complicit, in the planning, with many of them even carrying out dirty work, in order to have the events on that fateful day, come to fruition!
    Shame on any of these so called humans, to have remained silent all these years
    May there be a ‘hell’ that you will all eventually end up in!!

    • Davo, how woud they come forward to confess? There is no “New York Times” or “TIME magazine” that would publish their confessings. There’s no “Department of Justice” that would write up the case for a prosecution. There’s no … etc.

      We need a TRC and the sooner the better.

      Please see the video that Toben posted below about a man named Fred Leuchter who got into trouble in 3 countries (Canada, Germany and UK) for “holocaust denial.” Fred Leuchter calls our attention to “the Jews” that wanted to beat him up in jail and that got the Bavarian Police to break the law re kidnapping.
      But I am CERTAIN that the group Leuchter refers to as “the Jews” is not quite what he thinks. It is a gang of men who have been either hired or pressured into doing that. Sure, each and every one of them may be sons of a Jewish family — that is no doubt the grounds on which they were tracked down for the “job.” But it’s not that they, as individuals, feel offended by Leuchter’s examination of the gas chambers at Auschwitz. It is that THE TOP BOZOS have them in thrall. They have kazillions of people in thrall.
      Different thralls for different folks.
      HELP!!!

      • I read the decision in Toben’s case and the ding-bat judge tried to elevate the ‘everyone knows 6 million, gas chambers, etc” to the level of Judicial Knowledge. She was a discredit to the legal profession.

        I also read the entire transcripts of Zundel’s trial. What a hoot! I would have hated to be the prosecutor in that case. Every one of his witnesses was exposed as a fraud – then the Defence got to open its case (Leuchter was one of the witnesses).

        When you end up cross-examining a ‘witness of truth’ all you end up doing is expanding on the already damning evidence. It just gets WORSE! The proper course is to just say ‘no questions’ and sit down. The prosecutor eventually took that course. I especially liked the Jew (with a tattoo from the camp, unlike ‘Weasel’) who gave evidence for a day and a half, only to have the prosecutor, when it came time to cross-examine, say “no questions”.

        When I returned to the Zundel site to read more of the transcripts, my computer was hacked and a big screen popped up with “WE’VE GOT YOU NOW”.

        No you don’t, all you did was piss me off you d–k heads.

        That prompted me to do more research, including the archives from Auschwitz (released by the Russians after the trial). Did you know that over 2,000 live births were recorded in the nursery at Auschwitz – pretty good tally for a ‘death camp’. I also know the exact number of Jews that were executed (mostly for camp infractions). If I told you the actual number this site would probably be shut down.

        Watch the video of Leuchter and what he went through after he gave evidence. There’s a lot of cowards out there that will ‘go along to get along’ 9-11, Port Arthur, etc – its the same for all these hoaxes.

  2. Cognitive Dissonance is real. There are other terms of which I can’t remember at present. I have been researching Borderline Personality Disorder for a few years, and I find these people can be easily distracted and refocused to a particular point. In reference to Tobin, Zundel, lrving, Duke etc., my father spent 3 years in a camp in Poland, and his memories were vastly different to historical record. I think Chopper Read summed it up perfectly, that a psychopath can whip up a room of mentally challenged people to follow their objective. Just a couple of points. Great blog and shared.

  3. Yes there are psychopaths, then there is the carrot and the stick, often dangled and wielded by said psychopaths. I suspect that many don’t realize how quickly the water became too deep chasing that carrot.

  4. Why did your Mom’s remark make me think of such charities as “Amnesty International”? John Finch of Melbourne wrote to them for urgent help re electronic-hits torture. The reply:

    Dear John,
    Many thanks for your email.

    We regret to inform you that Amnesty International is unable to offer you any assistance as your case does not fall within our areas of work.

    We do understand your concerns and desire that action be taken. However, our work is determined by the framework established by Amnesty International members at a global level, and all individual cases that we work on must fall within the terms established by our statute. This does not mean that we consider certain types of human rights, or human rights abuses, to be more important than others. Nor does it mean that we have reached any conclusion as to whether you may have been the victim of a human rights violation….

  5. Russia has surprised the uneducated Westerners with a bold declaration of war against ISIS and immediate commencement of bombing of targets.

    The following answer by Putin to a question during a conference few western viewers ever get to hear or see demonstrates his adjusting preparedness to abandon the polite diplomacy and set out the political realities from the Russian perspective.

    The conference occurred last year and the complete speech and question session can be viewed but this answer is just a little stunning to observe.

  6. Dee and Mary, This was a very important post and perhaps it could be expanded on and given a link on your home page. The status quo is being maintained but needs to be changed. Children need to learn about natural law, knowledge of self, about the human brain, about their minds and mind control, the trivium and quadrivium, imagination / creativity, etc. How can we change the consciousness of the order followers, police and military? The level of mind control at the present time is unbelievable.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion