Left: David Rockefeller, Right: Martin Bryant at age 11
by Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB
Was Martin Bryant mind-controlled? Undoubtedly yes. He was a Tavistock patient. That is evident from the fact that he was treated in 1983 by Dr Eric Dax. Both Dax and Dr Fred Emery were living in Australia experimenting with mind control for Tavistock. Dax was involved with the Deep Sleep fiasco at Chelmsford Hospital.
Did the Powers That Be make Bryant into a Manchurian candidate — as they often do? I don’t think so. He did not kill anyone that day. (He may have been directed to put a man in the boot of a car – in order to engender guilt.)
Possibly they set out to mess up his life, including perhaps killing his Dad, or even killing Helen Harvey. He would then be usable as a patsy or in some other role. The media would able to plant him in our minds as a fearsome being!
CIA’s Mind Control Stuff Is Not a Secret
The argument of this article is that all of us are being ‘treated’ by Tavistock. That’s the name of an Institute founded in London in 1920 as an educational charity. It is run by the Big Daddy intelligence agency MI6 — the force behind most or all of modern terrorism.
Note: we’re not in Conspiracy Land when we talk about CIA mind control. In 1975, Senator Frank Church held Congressional hearings that revealed all the important parts. There have also been court cases such as Val Orlikow’s and Frank Olson’s in which the CIA paid damages.
There are many proofs – pleas see my video on Mind Control at my Youtube channel “Mary W Maxwell.”
But it’s not just individuals that they play with. These creeps endeavor to design our very culture. They have a mandate from their bosses to destabilize society and to busy everyone with worry about debt and health issues, as well as about the great threat of “terrorism.”
Planning the Future of Humanity
Suppose you received an assignment to plan the future of the human race for the next 200 years. How would you proceed? You might first take stock of what’s out there. That is, you’d look at human nature, and inventory the various cultures’ ways of coping.
To make the plan for the future, you might ask folks to comment on what makes them happy, and what distresses them. Your goal would probably be to design practices or structures aimed at increasing the happiness and decreasing the distress. The great creative potential of humans is something you would also try to tap.
Audacity, Thy Name Is Tavistock
Maybe you think it audacious, even for a nice person like yourself, to presume a right to design the future! But Tavie (as I call Tavistock) has been doing that for over a hundred years. And believe me, it was never their goal to increase happiness or decrease distress. Rather they need to control us.
Look around at the fruit of their social engineering. The Australian mind-controller Fred Emery “predicted” – in his 1977 book, Futures We Are In — that people would develop “dissociation” such that they could not tell reality from fantasy. At Gumshoe, Fair Dinkum has lamented precisely that!
Note: Emery also said people would lose their moral judgment.
My Sociobiological Theory of Tavie
I look to evolutionary biology to find the fixed parameters of our species. I compare us to other species. I believe H sapiens exhibits the well-established (though not universal) mammalian pattern of male hierarchy-formation.
Ever male individual unconsciously seeks a place on the available ladder of status. Only a few can attain top position; the rest automatically resign themselves to a lesser status. When the alpha gets weary-looking, a new challenger overthrows him.
Centuries ago, some humans sort of beat the system by developing ways to attain – and keep – the top positions by deception. Miseducating the population is their tool.
I have stated before and now wish to clarify, in relation to Tasmania’s Port Arthur tragedy of 1996, that the persons at the top who think up such ‘missions’ as the massacre, are nut jobs, clinical cases.
I also believe that the men at the VERY top, who, of course are not the ones doing the shooting, worry 365 days a year, that they will be ousted – or even just “outed.” In nature, a mammal alpha can never hold the whole group at bay. He has to sleep at night, and someone will get him.
My sociobiological theory is that the formation of a World Government could be predicted by anyone who understands hierarchies. The only way the alphas can stay at the top is by suppressing all rivals. A human must conquer every nation – just to be on the safe side. (Julius Caesar interjects: “Tell me about it.”)
I can see how today’s top bananas would start to believe they could do anything and everything. I estimate that they are desperate in the way that an alpha has to be.
And, being human, they will also engage in that wonderful human practice known as self-deception. The alphas believe what is comfortable for them to believe, just as we all do.
So they can never say, even to themselves, “Oops, we’ve bit off rather more than we can chew.” In fact they have bit off far, far more than they can chew. They certainly cannot run 7 billion people’s lives.
(Bozos, I’m talking to you. You have no chance of succeeding. Start looking for an amnesty. I will support you in that. Wouldn’t I mind if you find happiness after all your killing? No. I do not care one way or t’other. I want the killing to stop. I want the planet to be not wrecked!)
These boys infiltrate every government, every religion, every academic group. They have caused a mess in science. They have managed to poison the earth, and this not by accident but as part of their drive for control.
They want to control everyone’s thoughts. I mean is that puerile or what?
Tavistock, as Explained by Daniel Estulin
Daniel Estulin is famous for trying to crash Bilderberg meetings. (Thank you, Daniel.) I quote from his new book, Tavistock Institute — the entity that pretty much owns psychology and psychiatric medicine.
“What I have described… as horrendous and unbelievable it may seem… is a hideous reality: the encroachment of fascism with a democratic face. It was devised at the Tavistock Institute with… help from the Rockefeller family going back to the beginning of the 20th Century. This ‘reality’ which, if faced as reality,… can be wiped off the face of the earth.
“However, if not dealt with up front, then within a relativity short period of time, everything else we do as people, every hope we have for a better world, will come crashing down… It is the Tavistock Institute or us… There are no other alternatives” (page 37). [Emphasis added.]
Well, that’s saying it! Here are some more specifics:
“The development of the CIA has been essentially directed to the systematic infiltration of all principal existing institutions, with the help of some of the leading families, such as Dupont.
Allan Dulles is a prototypical Eastern Establishment figure, is a perfect example of the invisible confluence of fascist interests around the creation of new imperial dominion controlled by Rockefeller through CIA-Tavistock corporate interests.”
“For instance, Dulles was put in charge of the CIA’s Bluebird mind control project. Allan and John were senior partners at Rockefeller Standard Oil’s chief law firm, Sullivan & Cromwell, a notorious CIA front with links to the most important financial houses on Wall Street (pages 50-51).”
Now See Estulin’s Take on Sesame Street
“The first thing a child sees is a show dominated by animal-like creatures with human charateristics, the famous Muppets. Malcolm Gladwell [of Tavistock] said ‘Sesame Street was built around a single, breakthrough insight, that if you can hold the attention of children, you can educate them’.”
What about adult brain washing? Daniel Estulin shows how nostalgia is used to set you back into the comfortable state of your youth:
“TV producers put you in touch with the most infantile and banal emotions, and make you nostalgic for them. The hidden message; in these difficult times cherish the memories and values of your infantile past. Television is a big eraser, wiping away your real memories of the past. The Tube superimposed a twisted view of that reality by appeal, not to your mind, but to your infantile emotions.” (page 172)
Rockefeller Is One Hundred Years Old
Isn’t it time we admitted our mistakes and our human weakness in having fallen for all this garbage? Rocky plans to live to be 200. Should we continue to support him?
Should we let Tavistock come to beautiful Australia and train our police and military, by way of State Secrets, to kill and maim and change the brain of any or all citizens?
Huh? What do you think? Come on, rustle up some grey matter and think about this.
Dear Reader, we got took. That’s a fact and we cannot change it. The Port Arthur massacre was one great big fun day for some persons who themselves were probably lost from kindergarten onwards. We ought to wake up to these sordid and amazing facts.
Of course it may be difficult for us to make the needed changes. But it will be a lot more difficult NOT to make them.
— Mary W Maxwell is author of Morality among Nations (State University of New York Press, 1990) and, under the pseudonym Fortunata Fifi, is author of Teen Etiquette with Feeling: How To Make Life Beautiful with Time-Tested Rules of Relationships (2015).