by Dee McLachlan
I remember when my flat-mate called out, “A plane hit the World Trade Center.” Then we watched the second plane fly into the South Tower. Moments later my friend uttered – spontaneously — “That’s got to be CIA.”
I pondered that possibility for an hour, but by the next day I had “settled” into believing that Osama Bin Laden had orchestrated the attack. This was obviously as a result of the firm declaration by leaders — which the media repeated OVER and OVER and OVER again.
This accusation against “the Arabs” remained the foundation for everything Western governments did for the subsequent decade and right up until today. It resulted in wars, the death of millions, and the rise of the security-state industries.
The media’s “first-in” strategy, and a “repetition-blitz” had succeeded to a spectacular degree.
It was only years later that I managed to reverse my “Bin-Laden-switch” and started thinking logically. It also resulted in me feeling depressed for many weeks after my discovery that “governments” kill their own people.
Then, when I started to challenge others about 9-11, I faced vacant stares, or a quick changing of the subject, and often enough an accusation that I was a “nut-job.”
So how do sane, intelligent people see nothing wrong? Is it like a magic trick — or a trick on the mind?
What exactly happens? Gumshoe has been talking about mind control lately, especially Mary Maxwell’s writing about Doublethink. Let me see if I can pin down the 9-11 reportage thing, and as an example, see how Jon Faine, radio host of Australian Broadcasting Corporations’s 774 show, becomes a gate keeper to information.
The First Explanation
As the song goes “The first cut is the deepest...”, the FIRST explanation has the best chance to embed into the brain.
On the morning of 9-11, ‘experts’ like Paul Bremer pointed to Bin Laden within hours. This paved the way for leaders to apportion blame – with almost miraculous speed — on 19 Muslims with box cutters.
The next important ingredient is repetition. We were told over and over who was responsible. Spontaneous reports from the street, that it was “like bombs going off” – which conflicted with the official story — were never played again on mainstream television. Quickly, hosts and newsreaders began to toe the line.
Imagine on that night of September 11 if news readers were instead reporting that “Building 7 looked like a demolition job…. the towers looked like they exploded… witness heard bombs… boom-boom-boom… like a demolition job”, the world would be a different place right now. Our minds would have pursued other answers.
This means that some very powerful people orchestrated the mainstream media to be complicit in this deceit.
Who told newsreaders, television hosts, and reporters to stop reporting on bombs and other anomalies that conflicted with the official lie? Surely they WERE told!
Blind Institutional Allegiance
Television broadcasts of these events are being used as a weapon against the people. The “controllers” know they can numb the population into a mindset — very easily. Is it all part of Tavistock’s control? They know how human nature works, how the brain works, how each emotion can be accessed and manipulated.
I wrote about Blind Institutional Allegiance in my “The “Stupid And Wrong” Syndrome – And The Expulsion of A Geelong Grammar Student” article. The VICTIM of sexual abuse was expelled from school for reporting and speaking out. The school’s hallowed reputation deserved blind obedience. Meanwhile, the abuser continued in his job, protected.
It’s no different in Canberra. Politicians, too, suffer from Stupid and Wrong Syndrome — they threaten whistleblowers with jail time.
How can this be?
It must be that people are capable of holding two opposite beliefs at the same time.
Remember Leon Festinger’s theory of cognitive dissonance? People often hold two conflicting beliefs, and they must go with the one that is easier at the moment if the two cannot both be called on.
In other words, your mind tricks you into the easiest and safest explanation, so you can get on with your day — blissfully.
And there are people that consciously know the truth — but are happier to “let sleeping dogs lie.”
All of this business is subconscious. Individuals adjust their perception of reality in order to achieve consonance — or a manageable balance. (Note: we adjust our perception of reality all the time, it’s a mental facility that generally helps our lives.)
Shaming Alternative Voices
I think some leaders might not be fully cognizant of what is really going on, but they are so managed that they blindly follow the script. They are absorbed by the importance of their destiny. And so leaders quickly shame anyone questioning “their” version.
But what is worse, is that television and radio hosts come to be the zealous guardians of the official story.
The Media Police Are Media Personalities
I can provide a perfect example: ABC’s 774 radio host, Jon Faine. (I had asked Mr Faine many years earlier to narrate a documentary that I produced — which he kindly and professionally did. It was only later that I began to question 9-11. So apologies, Jon, but you are the perfect example.)
I emailed him a few years ago suggesting that he interview Richard Gage from ae911truth.org. He emailed back:
“I confirm that i am not interested in sept 11 conspiracy theories. It is an insult to the dead to play with this. jon”
I would hope that Mr Faine would change his mind after listening to Bobby McIlvaine or Matt Campbell — but I doubt it. (They lost a son and brother respectively in the towers, and they are one reason why I continue to write about 9-11.) Matt Campbell has asked that the inquest be re-opened.
Mr Faine began his professional career as a solicitor — and is intelligent and extremely articulate. There is a reason he has a $300,000 taxpayer-paid salary at the ABC. In local and state politics, he displays an investigative and sharp mind. But when it comes to 9-11, Mr Faine shuts down. He loses all sense of logic, ignores evidence, and stops listening.
When discussing 9-11 with Kevin Braken (Victorian Trades Hall president) he could only argue back by making derogatory comments about Mr Braken. My article and the videos here. He again displayed this technique when interviewing former Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser on the USS Liberty.
And when I brought some Gumshoe articles to Mr Faine’s attention, he wrote back:
“And your point is…… That the internet is full of rubbish? And this is more of it”
Mr Faine is a lawyer. Surely he should understand that the evidence precedes a conviction. But he refers to anyone questioning the official story in the most derogatory language. In his “discussion” with Mr Braken he went on with descriptions such as… “lunatic fringe,” “absurd nonsense,” and “…debate whether or not the earth is flat.”
I remind Mr Faine that on the tenth anniversary of the attacks, for a period of four days, experts in Structural Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, and History (obviously the lunatic fringe???) gave well-researched testimony to an international panel of distinguished judges. (It’s known as the Toronto Hearings.)
So what is happening here?
I experienced the same “brick wall” when I spoke to Jonathan Barnett who was a consultant for FEMA. (My article on mind manipulation here.)
Derryn Hinch displayed the same angry response to contributor Christopher Brooks when questioned about Martin Bryant’s part in Port Arthur. Read my article “The Dairy Farmer vs The Shameful Australia Media.”
I have am now more fascinated than ever on how easy it is to manipulate an open mind.
Something is not only blocking these people from seeing reality. They are now POLICING the official story. And they shame intelligent and investigative researchers from questioning the evidence.
We need to call each and every one of these media personalities to account. My guess is they have no clue what they are really doing. But they have become the gate keepers for criminal activity and false flag events.