by Mary W Maxwell
The first seven parts of this series reported on, and speculated about, the matter of how personages in the various institutions refrained from reporting thousands – repeat: thousands – of cases of child sexual abuse in Australia.
While the Royal Commission is a wonderful undertaking, and “I ain’t knockin’ it,” it seems unlikely that it will arrive at meaningful conclusions. I just can’t see the Commissioners breaking out of the mold to declare that we have hidden forces in our society that possess the wherewithal to do terrible things.
And thereby hangs the tale. When respectable people set out to discuss an issue, they do it in terms of the known. They might stand in front of a chart and point to the input of the police, the state’s education system, alcoholic parents, whatever, to the issue at hand (child abuse). I doubt if they would utter a word about anything that isn’t already on the chart – anything ‘speculative.’
We can only discuss things for which we already have some representation in the brain. I call this mental furniture. In earlier Parts of this series I proffered some new pieces of mental furniture:
Part 2, “The Catholic Hierarchy’s Participation,” theorized that the reason bishops failed to take action against pedophile priests is that the bishops are not what we think they are. They are infiltrators. They take their marching orders from powerful people whom we can’t identify.
Part 3, “Power and Dr Day’s Predictions,” envisioned a world government, associated with Rockefeller, whose sense of planning for its own survival encompassed the destruction of anything that might stand in the way. If this meant perverting normal society in cruel ways, well, fine.
Part 5, “Cardinal Pell and Mind Control,” reiterated the idea of infiltration and added some information about the MK-Ultra program – and Part 6 offered more about Brainwashing.
Part 7. “The Police’s Role in Covering Up Pedophilia” almost said that if the bishop’s hadn’t covered it up, the victims would still have met a roadblock: the cops would suppress the story.
In other words, if you haven’t already got pieces of mental furniture to represent the existence in our society of a bunch of infiltrators, mind-controllers, persons who plan cruel things, and police officials hiding public crime, you had better add them in.
Child Sexual Abuse – What’s It For?
Back to the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. In my series of articles, I clearly lean toward a ‘finding’ that the real culprit is World Government and that it hires the Intelligence Services — of any nation — to do the needful. Think about “Official Secrets Acts.” Ask: whom do they benefit?
As I haven’t yet got the data about pedophile rings, I’m unable to say that persons at the top do this thing (arrange for children to be abused) for a particular purpose. But here are some possible purposes:
Pedophilia is used to tempt politicians and others into crime – this most famously embarrassing crime – so they can be blackmailed.
It creates a lot of broken children who might then be on tap to get drug-addicted.
The sale of kiddie porn, including snuff films – is a lucrative business.
Within the top brass, there are ‘occult’ motivations for the committing of pedophile crimes.
It could help build up a scandal in the Church, which would then undermine religion.
Some of it is done simply as an experiment: the formation of cults was reportedly undertaken as a way of testing methods of social control.
You may wonder why I ignore the large category of pedophiles who simply have the urge for sex with minors. They’re not part of the Royal Commission’s study! If such a man – say, the late Philippe Trutmann at Geelong – commits his crimes, that is not a puzzle. It happens. But — I am asking here — when ‘pillars of the community’ fail to report it, do they have a method in their madness?
Recall the precautionary principle. It urges us to take steps to handle a problem even if we don’t have all the facts proven. I hereby suggest that we have plenty of information showing that World Government does exist. It may have been ‘in business’ as early as the 18th century. For sure it had the United States in its grip by the mid-20th century.
For some reason I think the top dogs allowed both HG Wells and George Orwell to ‘leak’ some of the methods of takeover that would be used. Wells presented his secret knowledge in the form of a novel “The Open Conspiracy.” So did Orwell — first in “Animal Farm,” and then in “1984.” More of the political methodology was supplied by Col Edward House in his novel “Philip Dru, Administrator,” in 1912. Possibly this was all an attempt to ‘condition’ the readers.
Institutions that are helping to coordinate many nations under a World Government, are: the European Union, NATO, the World Bank, and the IMF.
Also, it’s apparent that the mainstream media work directly for World Government. Media’s influence is second to none. As Yuri Bezmenov said, to control a culture, aim at the very young: media does a lot of training of the young. Media wants everyone to march to the beat of the same drummer — its drummer.
Getting the Conspiracy Story Right
I personally do not subscribe to esoteric theories as to who is running the show. I think it suffices to watch who attends the Economic Summits, the Bilderberg meetings, and so forth.
And when you see NPINBF – “normal [legal] procedure is not being followed,” you can deduce that the courts are “not allowed” to be independent.
Gumshoe News website has been tracking the unfair convictions of Jahar Tsarnaev, for the Marathon bombing, and Martin Bryant, for the Port Arthur shootings. Judges were ‘cluey’ enough to know that they had to tuck Jahar Tsarnaev and Martin Bryant away in jail. Often, after a Supreme Court decision, scholars go to town in the law journals, criticizing the judgment. Not for the Tsarnaev or Bryant cases though — World Government would not be amused.
When I arrived at the Royal Commission hearings, I was admittedly not free of prejudice. I came to them already believing that a World Government has great control. So I naturally saw the words and actions of the men in the witness box in accordance with that view. It seems a very good fit!
That is, your basic bishop is not a free man. Neither is the music department head at Geelong. They pick up signals that tattling on the child abusers would not be in their interest. So, until someone can talk me out of it, I hold the opinion that World Government is controlling those persons. Call it a conspiracy theory if you like.
More on Dr Day
In Part 3, “Power and Dr Day’s Predictions,” I reported what Richard Day, MD, said, in 1969, about the coming fall of Christianity, and several other things. Each showed clearly that his boss (Rockefeller) intended to manipulate society to a great degree, and had the means to do it.
From this we can acquire mental furniture of the social engineer, and the boss who is at home anywhere on the planet. Here are a few more of these shocking plans. Take note of how they have all come to pass.
Dr Lawrence Dunegan quoted all this from his recollection of Dr Day’s 1969 speech:
“Everyone will be given permission to have sex, to enjoy however they want. Anything goes. This is the way it was put. In addition, I remember thinking, “How arrogant for this individual, or whoever he represents, to feel that they can give or withhold permission for people to do things!”
“More men will be transferred to other cities and in their jobs, more men would travel. Therefore, it would be harder for families to stay together. This would tend to make the marriage relationship less stable and, therefore, tend to make people less willing to have babies.
“Alcohol abuse would be both promoted and demoted at the same time. The vulnerable and the weak would respond to the promotions. Drunk driving would become more of a problem; and stricter rules about driving under the influence would be established so that more and more people would lose their privilege to drive.
“Buildings would be allowed to stand empty and deteriorate, and streets would be allowed to deteriorate in certain localities. The purpose of this was to provide the jungle, the depressed atmosphere for the unfit.
“The continued pre-eminence of the United States and the relative independence and self-sufficiency of the United States would have to be changed. This was one of the several times that he said in order to create a new structure, you first have to tear down the old, and American industry was one example of that.
“VCR’s were not around at that time, but he indicated that video cassette players would be available for use in the home. He said something like: “you’ll see people in the movies doing everything you can think of.” He went on to say that all of this is intended to bring sex out in the open.
“Growing your own vegetables was unsafe, it would spread disease or something like that. So the acceptable idea was to protect the consumer, but the real idea was to limit the food supply. Growing your own food would be illegal. And if you persist in illegal activities like growing your own food, then you’re a criminal.”
Some state laws in the US limit food-growing.
Don’t Be Scared. It Doesn’t Pay To Be Scared
Who could not be scared? The whole thing is eminently scary. I often hear it said on the Internet that all the World Government predictions will come true. But I think that’s not so certain — on the practical grounds that the top dogs, the Bozos, have bit off more than they can chew.
But even if they are capable, their success must depend on our cooperation. People willingly watch propaganda TV News. Judges willingly send patsies to their death. Teachers willingly dumb the kids down. Legislators — don’t get me started on legislators — create oppressive ‘anti-terrorism’ laws. (Note: when I say Don’t get me started I always mean Get me started.)
It’s our move now. If we’d wise up and stop believing the garbage they tell us in the MSM, and stop being silent when a Justice Cox convicts a Martin Bryant, and start talking to one another on the basis of the precautionary principle, we might have half a chance.
Note: the Number One impediment to our behaving sensibly is probably: fear of embarrassment. When something is not the done thing, everybody is EXTREMELY inhibited from doing it! Embarrassment was probably adaptive in early days, but in the 21st century it could very well prove lethal.
Just think how inexpensively that impediment could be overcome. It’s not in the same league as other scary measures we may need to take. Give yourself a little lecture about it today.
“I can do something embarrassing. I will not die from embarrassment….”
— Mary W Maxwell can be contacted at maryWmaxwell.com, a website with free downloads.