By Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB
Allow me to hold forth on a wonderful subject. Namely, why we should feel happy and hopeful in regard to the breakthrough achieved by Mrs Fiona Barnett.
I am referring to her revelations about the “s” cults in which she was brought up, in Engadine NSW. Granted these are not pleasant to listen to (or to watch, on her videos at Youtube), but this information can set us free.
I reckon the biggest change that ever happened in the species Homo sapiens occurred when some individuals learned how to control the brain of other individuals. Not that we don’t all engage in a bit of controlling other people – by indoctrination, role modeling, or anger. We do.
But I am talking about A’s ability to get into B’s motor cortex, say, and have B do A’s bidding without B being able to engage the part of his brain that would hesitate to do it. Nowadays it’s relatively easy to do this if you’ve got the equipment and training. And it is big business.
To cite a simple example, the mafia now uses mind control to “develop” its prostitutes. One advantage of this is that the girl will not run away or complain; she is not really aware of any options. She “believes” what she is supposed to believe. This is probably done by hypnosis.
Anyway the “s” cults – you know I mean satanic but I prefer to avoid the word – were quite able to turn one local girl, Fiona, into a slave. Along the way she was also an experimentee. The Satanists often avail themselves of funding from scientific projects. (They perhaps invent those projects!)
What Should We Do with the New Information?
Mrs Barnett has told us of the darkest goings on, right here in good old Australian society. She has named many names. I will mention only two who are deceased: Kim Beazley, Sr, the father of the Kim who was Leader of the Opposition in the Howard years, and Anthony Kidman, a doctor, who is the father of film star Nicole Kidman.
Naturally one would prefer to chuck the new information into the rubbish bin, as there is nothing palatable about it. Fiona has said that both of those men killed people in ceremonies, before large audiences. She also said that they and the audience members drank the blood of the victims.
Why am I ‘happy’ – if you could call it that – that she has stated her recollections on a video? (See Candy Girl, Part 2.) It is because I was already aware of it in the US and never imagined that it would be believed. I think the way Fiona has stated is very Aussie and will be believed. Thank you, Mrs Barnett.
So we should be able to accept that it is true and then wake up to some amazing facts. Very roughly I think these three facts can be taken on board now.
1. Capturing Leaders and Potential Leaders
Very powerful persons have enslaved many people and it is likely that they aim at enslaving all officials as well as natural leaders. The consequence of this is that the very persons who we look to for guidance are secretly controlled by “the enemy.” (I mean by definition, such controllers are the enemy of everyone.)
An example could be Kim Beazley, Jr. I cannot say for sure, but the stories told by whistleblowers such as Fiona usually involve many members of a perpetrator’s family. I think it is reasonable to assume that Kim himself was treated horribly as a child. Would he then be able to act in a principled way as a social leader? I think not.
Undoubtedly, by the way, both of the Bush presidents in the US (George HW, from 1989 to 1993, and Dubya from 2001 to 2009) were children of satanic parents. It is often said that both of them, when seniors at Yale, were recruited into the Skull and Bones fraternity. True, but their mind control must have been installed in infancy.
Just imagine how useful it is to us now to understand, all of a sudden, that many officials (in Parliament, in the courts, in schools) are not exactly “fully present.” This would explain bad policy. Wait till you see how much it explains.
It would explain how a nut like Dr Paul Offit, as head of “the American Academy of Pediatrics” in the US could make the preposterous remark that a child could tolerate 100 vaccines at once – and say it with full confidence.
- Explaining the Loss of Humaneness
In the sociobiological view of the human species, we are all primarily self-oriented or self-concerned. The mammal in us prompts actions that are selfish and – where there is opportunity – ruthless.
How then did we end up thinking we are nice? Well, we actually are nice. Firstly, there is an instinct for altruism, especially towards one’s own kind, and towards those in need. It doesn’t take a sermon to make you be helpful and caring—the performance of the act releases opioids. The motivation is pleasure.
Secondly, there are ideas developed over millennia, by religious leaders or thinkers, that point to ways to increase the pleasure of life by rules of social restraint.
So, if there are mammalian habits that tend to work against us, we can think up ways to sermonize against them. We can pressure, with anger and ostracism, those who won’t follow these nice rules.
In sum, we have been enjoying humane cultures. It thus comes as a surprise, and an important lesson, to find that a significant segment of the population holds exactly the opposite values! Satanists de-value caring; they are contemptuous of it.
Instead of following a moral god they worship an immoral god. And they’ve kept secret about it! How wonderful – pardon me but it is wonderful – to have unearthed this essential fact.
- Re-Establishing Normal Trust in Neighbors
I was born in 1947 and found it normal and natural to trust the community — until around 1980. Then, when Margaret Thatcher was PM in Britain and Ronald Reagan was in the White House, there seemed to be a shift over to believing that “everyone is out to get everyone.”
Thatcher famously said “There is no such thing as society; there are only individuals.” This was incorrect biology – we are one of the social species in the animal kingdom; there is society, Mrs Thatcher. But I agree that it can be unraveled if some hidden forces are determined to unravel it.
And to unravel it, one thing they would need is precisely to persuade us that there are only individuals! If you are but one individual in a huge group, each of whom is struggling to get advantage, there’s no point your holding back to help others — you’d be silly to do that.
And there’s no point acting on the basis of “duty” much less on the basis of “principle. That is for fools or persons who have fallen hook, line, and sinker for the lies of religion.
So see? To discover that the Thatcher-Reagan doctrine was part of a plan to ruin trust in our neighbor is a great step forward. Did I say thank you, Fiona?
Having found out the amazing practices of the cults, we need to clean them out of our community. I won’t attempt to map a plan. I think it should be obvious. It would probably help if every parent would tell the kids about it.
— Mary W Maxwell can be reached at her website prosecutionfortreason.com.