Home 911Truth Resolution to Investigate the Collapse WTC Building 7

Resolution to Investigate the Collapse WTC Building 7

18

,alcom at edgecliffMalcolm Turnbull catching public transport (L), Edgecliff Station (R)

One of Gumshoe’s readers — a member of Lawyers for 911Truth — sent this letter to Gumshoe.

Dear media and people,

By now many have just thought that the 9/11 mass murders will be successfully forgotten or covered up by the politicians and mass media.

Seems that they are mistaken.

Just as those who thought that covering institutionalised paedophile behaviours, would never be exposed, some instances going as far back as the 1970-80’s leading to gaol sentences for perpetrators.

Well, many architects and engineers (www.ae911truth.org) in the US are increasingly seeing the scientific light and are calling upon the AIA (American Institute of Architects) for a resolution on building Number 7 as referred to in the message to me below.

The resolution 16-3 is titled: 

“Investigation into the Total Collapse of Trade Centre Building 7.”

The Intent:

“To Adopt A Position Paper in Support of a New Investigation into the Total Collapse of World Trade Centre Building 7 on September 11 2001.”

The Delegate’s information booklet is referred to with a link here.

However, for those who appreciate that it is about time that they consider that now is the time to be informed about building 7. They should read the contents of the paper supporting the resolution.

The resolution and supporting information may be found from page 37 in the link in the third paragraph. There is no need to go through all the procedural information.

I first brought the questions concerning building 7 to the attention of the then candidate for the Federal seat Wentworth, Mr Malcolm Turnbull outside Edgecliff railway station in about October 2004. I similarly raised the questions concerning building 7 at the same place in about October 2007. Of course my local member is now the Prime Minister of Australia. Additionally he has been updated for the last 12 years by me as have many other federal politicians.

It must be apparent that the Honourable Prime Minister by now should be well acquainted with the problems with building 7 and the questions; as to how building 7 relates also to questions concerning the destruction of Trade Centre towers 1 and 2….. plus the whole event, that has been justified into involving Australia into hostilities for the last 15 years..

As I have said many times:

“Science trumps any silly official government 911 conspiracy theory every time’.

Cheers,

B Antcliffe.

Double Bay.

Member: Lawyers for 9/11 truth.

 


 

Resolution 16-3

Title: Investigation of the Total Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7

Sponsors: Daniel Barnum, FAIA and Fifty Members of the Institute Intent To adopt a Position Statement in support of a new investigation into the total collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11, 2001.

Text of Resolution:

WHEREAS, according to the AIA Public Policies and Position Statements, architects are professionally obligated to use their knowledge, skill, and experience to engage in civic life; and

WHEREAS, World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7), a 47-story, steelframed high-rise building, suffered a total collapse at 5:20 PM on the afternoon of September 11, 2001; and

WHEREAS, the cause of the collapse of WTC 7 has become the subject of vigorous public debate, such that establishing the true cause of the collapse of WTC 7 is of great civic importance; and

WHEREAS, prior to and since September 11, 2001, no steel-framed highrise building has ever suffered a total collapse, except buildings demolished through the procedure known as controlled demolition; and

WHEREAS, the collapse of WTC 7 exemplified many of the signature features of controlled demolition, including:

  • Sudden onset: The roofline of WTC 7 went from being stationary to being in free fall in approximately one half-second.
  • Rapidity: The roofline of WTC 7 fell to the ground in less than seven seconds.
  • Free fall: For 2.25 seconds, or a third of its descent, WTC 7 fell at the rate of gravity over a distance of eight stories, meaning that the lower structure of the building provided no resistance whatsoever.
  • Symmetry: WTC 7 fell directly downward through what had been the path of greatest resistance, with the debris deposited mostly inside the building’s footprint.
  • Explosions and window breakage: Video shows vertical sequences of explosions and window breakage running up the north face of WTC 7 as it began to collapse. Copyright 2016, The American Institute of Architects 37 Washington, DC
  • Dismemberment: The steel frame of WTC 7 was almost entirely dismembered.

Totality: The entire structure of WTC 7 collapsed to the ground, leaving no sections of the building standing; and

WHEREAS, first responders and bystanders reported explosions and other phenomena suggestive of controlled demolition immediately prior to and during the collapse of WTC 7, as exemplified in the following account by a first-year NYU medical student identified as “Darryl” on 1010 Wins Radio: “[W]e heard this sound that sounded like a clap of thunder. Turned around. We were shocked to see that the building was, uh…. Well, it looked like there was a shockwave ripping through the building and the windows all busted out. It was horrifying. And then about a second later the bottom floor caved out and the building followed after that”; and

WHEREAS, a CNN video captured both the sound of an explosion coming from WTC 7 and the following statements prior to the onset of the collapse:

  • Unidentified voice: “You hear that?” Voice of emergency worker #1:
  • “Keep your eye on that building. It’ll be coming down soon.” Voice of emergency worker #2:
  • “Building is about to blow up, move it back…. We are walking back, there’s a building about to blow up. Flame and debris coming down”; and

WHEREAS, numerous experts in controlled demolition and structural engineering have attested that the collapse of WTC 7 could have only been caused by controlled demolition, as exemplified in the following statement made by Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko after viewing video of the collapse: “This is controlled demolition…. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job, done by a team of experts”; and

WHEREAS, in spite of the fact that WTC 7 had only few, small, and scattered fires and modest structural damage, the NYC Office of Emergency Management and the New York Fire Department predicted the collapse of WTC 7 with extraordinary confidence and precision, deciding to establish a safety zone around WTC 7 early in the afternoon and waiting several hours in anticipation of the building’s collapse; and

WHEREAS, local authorities were so certain of WTC 7’s eventual collapse that anticipation of the collapse was widely reported in the media, as exemplified by MSNBC’s Ashleigh Banfield, who reported, “I’ve heard several reports from several different officers now that that is the building that is gonna go down next. In fact, one officer told me they’re just waiting for that to come down at this point” — and by the BBC, who erroneously began reporting the collapse 23 minutes before it actually occurred; and Copyright 2016, The American Institute of Architects 38 Washington, DC

WHEREAS, in spite of the fact that local authorities predicted the collapse of WTC 7 with extraordinary confidence and precision, investigators for the Building Performance Study, conducted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), were “stunned” by the collapse of WTC 7 and concluded in May 2002: “The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence”; and

WHEREAS, three and a half years after the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) began its investigation into the World Trade Center disaster, NIST’s lead investigator, Dr. Shyam Sunder, stated that NIST had some “preliminary hypotheses,” but conceded, “[T]ruthfully, I don’t really know. We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7”; and WHEREAS, NIST finally concluded in its 2008 report that the collapse of WTC 7 was caused by “normal office fires,” thus abandoning earlier hypotheses that diesel fuel fires or structural damage caused the collapse; and

WHEREAS, according to NIST, the fires that it alleges triggered the total collapse of WTC 7 burned at temperatures “hundreds of degrees below those typically considered in design practice for establishing structural fire resistance ratings”; and

WHEREAS, NIST neglected to examine steel from WTC 7 with a “Swiss cheese appearance” that had been attacked by molten iron — as documented in Appendix C of the FEMA/ASCE Building Performance Study — and instead falsely alleged that no identifiable steel was recovered from WTC 7; and

WHEREAS, in its draft report for public comment, NIST falsely denied that WTC 7 entered free fall, and then acknowledged the occurrence of free fall in its final report, but falsely alleged that the occurrence of free fall was consistent with its computer model, which, in fact, does not show a period of free fall, nor does it come close to replicating the observed collapse; and

WHEREAS, NIST’s computer model omitted critical structural features of WTC 7, which, in the opinion of independent engineers, had they been included, the computer model would have shown that NIST’s alleged collapse initiation mechanism had zero probability of occurring; and

WHEREAS, NIST has refused to release key portions of its modeling data to engineers studying the collapse of WTC 7, claiming that to do so “might jeopardize public safety”; and Copyright 2016, The American Institute of Architects 39 Washington, DC

WHEREAS, thousands of members of the architecture and engineering professions, including the 97 sponsors of this resolution, believe there is sufficient evidence contradicting NIST’s explanation of the collapse of WTC 7 to warrant a new investigation. NOW,

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the AIA Board of Directors shall commence the process to adopt a Position Statement, to be published in the AIA Directory of Public Policies and Position Statements, stating both:

  • The AIA’s belief that incidents involving the catastrophic failure of buildings and other structures must be investigated using the highest standards of science-based investigation and analysis; and
  • The AIA’s support for a new investigation into the total collapse of WTC 7.

 

SHARE

18 COMMENTS

    • Thank you, Xbarra. That’s excellent. The only bit i could not buy was the final statement that “they” are 50 or 100 years ahead.
      I do realize that’s been true in the past (e.g., the Rothschilds probably had telephones 70 years before “Alexander Graham Bell”). But I think these people have no sense of biology or Nature.

      They don’t see ahead to the crashing of their own habitat.
      Anyone cuckoo enough to believe in Lucifer has got to be engaged in a lot of irrational thinking — and that means that whatever it is that they “see” for 50 or 100 years henceforward is unreliable. Really, how could they be so dumb as to contaminate agriulture with GMO.

      • I think the 50/100 years is probably a bit short to be honest. There is no doubt in my mind they are following a plan be it prophecy or agenda.
        As you are aware a big part of this plan is the introduction of a one world everything which includes a massive reduction of people in the worlds population. It’s obvious that this reduction plan is well underway and includes all facets of our lives from food, to medicine, to water, to the air we breathe and the list goes on.

        As for GMO’s, logic suggests that either they don’t eat it or have a way to neutralize its effects? The chemtrails in our skies is something they must be breathing as you see it in all countries most of the time, again they must have a way to neutralize its effects. The neutralizing of the poisonous air would be made substantially easier by having knowledge of what, when, where certain substances are being released?

        In regards to crashing their (and ours) habitat it would seem that agenda 21 and agenda 2030 is their plan to start the repair of damage done by them and their corporations? This again is another tool they use in the control and reduction of the worlds peoples….

        • OK, Xbarra, I capitulate, and yes the war plans of 20th century, especially the coming of a Middle East war, are said to have been penned by Albert Pike in 1880.
          But I don’t rule out that they are stupid enough to fail to realize that the biosphere is a holistic system. And if they know how to bring back extinct species I think I’ll have to admire them.
          (What am I saying!)
          Xbarra, thanks for continuing to bring the environment into our Gumshoe subject matter.

  1. It is UNCONTESTABLE FACT, building 7 was demolished.
    In fact I personally have recording of the owner stating he “ordered the building be pulled.” Yet strangely, no one has ever brought him to task for that utterance.
    And weirder still, no one has ever questioned, WHEN the explosives were placed within that building to bring it down.
    I find that incredibly weird.
    It takes serious time and planning to design, where to place explosives in a building for demolition, then time again to actually place those explosives and wire them up.
    Therefore, it’s quiet obvious, the demolition of these buildings was a PLANNED EVENT, which took considerable TIME to PLAN and to put in place.
    Investigations need to be done, as to what exactly occurred within these buildings leading up to the date of demolition.
    Drilling holes into concrete and/or steel takes organization and time, people MUST have been aware of these goings on under some concocted pretext, we need to hear from such people.

    • Eddy, what good would it do you (or any of us) to “hear from such people” about the placing of explosives?
      What good does it do to have a photo of Jahar Tsarnaev wearing a white backpack? The judge — and jury — do not then do the obvious right thing. They convict him.
      The gathering of evidence is not what is needed. Indeed, the beautiful letter from the Engineers demanding “investigation” is a waste of time. I don’t mean the letter is a waste — it lays out beautifully the facts of the crime. I mean it is a waste to say “we need to find out what hapened.” WE ALREADY KNOW WHAT HAPPENED to Building 7.

      Now we need to deal with the criminals.
      You said it earlier: the miscreant, in this case Larry Silverstein has not — in 15 years — been arrested. That’s the only issue.

  2. Can someone explain to me, what if you are absolutely correct that WTC 7 was demolished intentionally?
    Is that a crime?. If so, what fine does the culprit pay??? I am not aware of any verifiable evidence of deaths from collapse of WTC 7.
    So, if you prove it…. So what? The U.S. government has never used WTC 7 collapse as a reason to invade Iraq.
    IT FOCUSED ONLY ON WTC 1 & 2. Even NIST didn’t look into WTC 7………… so why all this interest in WTC 7.
    Surely it’s obvious this is another false flag to stop proper investigation of the Twin Towers collapse. And you know, judging by the obsessive interest by so many in our community in (or should I say been duped into believing) discussing WTC7 instead of the Twin Towers, again the MSM has done a great job…. well done to the guilty!! Wake up people.. WAKE UP!

    • Con,
      It’s simple. No plane hit WTC7. It collapsed at freefall, ergo, it was wired for demolition. If one building was wired, they were ALL wired for demolition. Did planes really hit Bldgs. 1 & 2? Were there even ANY hijackers? (many of the so-called Saudi “hijackers” reported themselves as alive and well after the event)
      Maybe the suppressed 28 pages is meant to reinforce our belief in the existence of the 19 Arab hijackers.
      Did a plane hit the Pentagon? Looks more like a Tomahawk cruise missile strike. Shanksville likewise. No debris, bodies, luggage, engines, nothing. Just a little smouldering hole in the ground.

      It no long a question of evidence. It’s definitely a question of public awareness and the general public giving a damn. A long,slow process but necessary.

    • Demolition of WTC7 is the most vivible (obvious) evidence that 9-11 was pre-planned. It is a crime for Silverstein to collect insurance payout on a building that he had to know was rigged for demolition.

      Con, your thinking is skewed. WTC7 = false flag to stop proper investigation of Twin Towers?

      Efforts to bring a rule of law solution must be exhaustively pursued–and YES, we already have sufficient investigative evidence to commence indictments.
      See indictment of Rudy Giuliani, et. al. here: http://911JusticeCampaign.org

  3. As science clearly trumps our federal politicians and mass media 911 conspiracy deceit; is there not one question raised by the architects and engineers, that after 12 years being brought to notice to our parliament, that has awakened our politicians to the 911 false flag lie?
    Why is Australia still involved in having our soldiers killed on the basis of an abominable deceit directed upon our military families and the Australian public by politicians and our mass media?
    Why does our mass media not mention all the other lies reported throughout history to cause civilised beings to go invade and kill other human beings.
    Mr. Turnbull, are you part of this continuing serial deceit or are you going to be fair dinkum with your fellow Aussies and expose the Howard government lies comtinually perpetrated by our federal
    representatives?
    If you wish to discuss this further, we may have another chat outside Edgecliff railway station at your convenience.

  4. There seems to be a problem with accomplishing comments here so I will try again. Apologies if there is a content repeat.
    As I have opined : science trumps silly 911 conspiracy theories every time.
    In the past we now know what the Vatican did to those who questioned religious concepts with reality.
    It is most wondrous that even now some perceive their reality in ignorance of scientific facts.
    So it is now with 911 as demonstrated by merely observing the collapse of building 7 supported by the Architects and engineers.
    How it is possible that all, (must be all as no one has questioned building 7) in the Australian parliament do not have the intellect to see the evidence.
    I canvassed the facts with our Prime Minister from 2004 and in 12 years, not a considered response provided in reply.
    Oh well, very boring Prime Minister. One may presume that our government will again lead by deceit and have us involved in more concocted wars that are not our business whilst ignoring the fact that all wars are predetermined by another boring false flag scenario to justify deceiving our soldiers to get themselves killed whilst the politicians and mass media salivate over their superannuation lifelong payouts out of harm’s way.

  5. The steel structure of a cantilevered building falls side ways, and the Granite free standing Facade Falls and Lands on Top, and you people are justified, pathetically sad how easy huckstery is.
    Resolution DOA, no one actually takes it seriously.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here