Home "Terrorism" What Happened in Nice, France? A Killer-Truck?

What Happened in Nice, France? A Killer-Truck?



by Malcolm R Hughes

There are so many random attacks in public these days it is hard to keep track of them. The latest one occurred at Nice, on the French Rivera, on Bastille Day. Perhaps that reminds you of similar desecrations of popular events, such as the bombing (alleged bombing, anyway) at the Boston Marathon, or the Atlanta Olympics.

I can’t undertake a comprehensive study, but I was startled by the claim that videos were made on the spot at Nice by the very same person who made one on the spot in Munich. Seems an impossible coincidence.

First let’s see how the “Heroic motorcyclist” story was reported worldwide in the mainstream media. The Evening Standard of London wrote:

A motorcyclist chased and leaped onto the truck driven by the Nice attacker as he ploughed his way through the crowds on a murderous rampage.

The brave rider pursued the 20 tonne lorry driven by Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel before jumping off his bike and climbing onto the side of the vehicle. He fell from the truck and ended up under its wheels.

A German journalist, who witnessed the attack, said he saw the motorcyclist dismount and race after the lorry.

That “German journalist” is Richard Gutjahr.” He is happy to show his name with this spectacular reporting. One quote from him that was carried by many papers is:

“I stood on the balcony, right on the Promenade des Anglais, and saw how people celebrated there, and how suddenly a truck drove through the crowd,” Richard Gutjahr said.

But now we learn that Gutjahr and his wife also filmed an earlier attack in Munich! (I first saw this at rense.com which linked to an article at rumormillnews.com.) The claim is that a couple, said to belong to Mossad, were the videographers of two incidents (maybe more, who knows). Their egos may have compelled them to give their name in the credits!

As for the Minich attack, here is another quote:

Local reporter Richard Gutjahr described the scene at the shopping center as something “out of a bad movie,” with the shopping center completely surrounded by police, a helicopter overhead, and police carrying semi-automatic rifles. Gutjahr was not able to confirm reports of deaths or injuries.

I ask: “What are the odds of one person being at the scene of two terrorist attacks in different countries without knowledge of the planning of such? And the wife, Einat Wilf, is not just a journalist. She is a member of Israel’s parliament, the Knesset. Her Wikipedia write-up lists her spouse as: Richard Gutjahr.

The Odd Truck

Earlier in the week I read an article posted by Mike King, editor of TomatoBubble.com  about the Nice terrorist attack. It showed photographs of the vehicle used. The article is entitled “Why No Blood On Murder Truck?”

Here is my similarly skeptical interpretation of those photographs. Although the front of the truck shows damage, there is no blood on vehicle or road leading to this site. Nor do I see any clothing attached to the truck, or strewn along roadway, though it supposedly hit 286 human bodies.

The truck has apparently 24 bullet holes in windscreen with no shattering or cracks visible. It is quite possible that these “bullet holes” are stick-on transfers — but since the photo is at a distance, it’s hard to discern.

Most of the “bullet holes” on the windscreen are on the passenger side of vehicle, so how bad a shot were the police officers? If these are transfers, being on that side of the vehicle would interrupt the driver’s view, less.

Something doesn’t ring true, to me, with these photographs. I can’t put my finger on it, but the front view of the truck doesn’t give me the same feeling as the side view. The police officer to the front is obscuring the area that is supposed to be damaged.


Why are the police officers on the opposite side of vehicle to the driver? Notice no bullet holes in side door of truck and what is the left-hand rifleman aiming at, certainly not the driver, and he is not even covering for his mates.

I have just viewed a video:

This gives me more insight to the tricks being played upon us, the public.

To me the truck appears to be an 8-ton vehicle, not a 20-tonne lorry, as stated by the London Evening Standard.  (Note: 8 tons = 8.1 tonnes.) In Australia a 20-tonne truck has a second rear axle, but this truck only has a single axle.

Where the police officers are standing alongside the truck in photo, the driver is supposedly still in cab, but he’s not able to be seen. However another report tells us that the driver left the cab and was shooting from a position away from the truck. If so, how did he escape the officers who had attempted to shoot him while in the cab?

At this stage the front of the truck is intact. In another scene, the front panel of the cab has now disappeared. You can see that in the photo at beginning of article.

Peekay agrees with me that while there are no bullet holes in passenger side door, after the incident we see the truck with shattered passenger window. Is anyone going to explain that for us?

I also see “bullet holes” in driver’s side door, but they are too low to have hit driver. There’s a group of “bullet holes” in panel behind driver. With all this inaccurate firing there are no bullet holes in rear view mirror or canopy of truck. There are no bullet holes to driver’s side window, no damage at all. Amazing.

In the video the truck with blown-out passenger window is parked on a road having a high camber but in the photo below it appears to be on level ground.

As for photographs of the victims, I have seen quite a few on the Internet, but they are taken from a distance and are not very clear.  The scenes of bodies could be a set-up — I just don’t know. One shot which apparently shows a child victim, to me, looks like a baby doll. Most of the “victims” are covered with sheets.

When we talk of 285 victims, that’s a lot of people. That is the equivalent of nine and a half army platoons. The photos only cover a very small fraction of that number.

In sum, as many incidents world-wide since 9/11 appear engineered by globalists, we must — for our own safety — look deeper into each catastrophe reported to see if the story in the media is feasible.

— Mal Hughes who became interested in the Port Arthur Massacre from 2004, now looks very closely at many incidents reported, with some suspicion.




  1. OFF-TOPIC. A quick jump has just occurred in Cherii Bonney’s number of signatures for an Inquest for Port Arthur. Now: 2,383. Please ask your third cousins to sign:


    Um, I said off-topic but could there be a connection to Nice? If so, what is the connection? Mal claims there is a connection (probably) between Munich and Nice. Montse Alarcon Flix claims there are women who showed up at the Marathon talking to reporters who also talked to reporters at Sandy Hook.

    I am not persuaded they are the same ladies but I was wrong on the orange blood, so maybe I am too conservative on this also.

  2. Thank you Malcolm … the following is to add to your dossier …

    A few days ago, I happened to listen to a first hand account (translated in ‘real time’) of that hero motorcyclist. I can’t track down the actual BBC program podcast but the transcript / story is essentially contained below. The motorcyclist described how he repeatedly punched the lorry driver through the wound down open window and looked him in the eye as the driver raised his gun and fired – but the motorcyclist witness described that the gun did not fire and stated that he presumed because it was already out of bullets (- “already out of bullets” – note the timing and sequence of events in all media accounts) …

    This interview / BBC report was quite strange and intrigued me …

    Anyway … for your dossier – here is just a sample of related links and media comments that raise even more questions … in summary:

    •Richard Gutjahr certainly gets around and is widely quoted by various MSM – but possibly gets it very wrong about the motorcyclist
    •Motorcyclist Franck gives his detailed first hand account a week later
    ◦(Either Gutjahr gets it wrong or this alive-and-well motorcyclist since promoted on the BBC is a fraud – OR it was a different motorcyclist)
    •Hollande declares extension of ‘state of emergency / martial law’ etc – no surprise there
    •Anti-Terrorist Sub-Directorate (SDAT) orders Nice (deputy) mayor to destroy all related CCTV regarding the truck event … in the interests of ‘transparency and truth’
    •French minister sues police woman re accusations she was coerced into ‘altering’ her account of events re security on hand.

    ‘Motorcyclist tried to stop him’
    from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36801431

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-36872112 (oops sorry – that’s Richard Gutjahr on hand at Munich)

    German journalist Richard Gutjahr witnessed the start of the attack and described seeing a motorcyclist pursue the truck and try to gain entrance to its cabin. But the biker fell off and was run over by its wheels …

    “The motorcyclist attempted to overtake the truck and even tried to open the driver’s door, but he fell and ended up under the wheels of the truck.”

    Nice attack: Motorcyclist died as he tried to use bike to stop Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel during massacre

    A heroic motorcyclist died as he tried to use his bike to stop the Nice attacker, a journalist has said.

    As the killer drove a lorry down a packed Nice promenade in an attack that would kill at least 84 people, a person on a motorcycle attempted to stop him and ended up giving his own life to do so, according to holidaying German journalist Richard Gutjahr.

    Nice attack: Hero motorcyclist ‘punched driver again and again’

    A Frenchman who was caught on video trying to stop the lorry attack in Nice a week ago has given an interview, dispelling assumptions that he must have been among the dozens who died.

    The man who gave his name as Franck, told the newspaper Nice-Matin how he climbed onto the step below the cab and punched the driver through a window.

    The driver picked up a pistol and tried to shoot Franck, but could not fire it.

    EXCLUSIVE. The scooter hero says: “I was ready to die to stop”

    Nice authorities turn down police request to delete footage of fatal truck attack

    ​The request was sent by Anti-Terrorist Sub-Directorate (SDAT), a special police division battling extremism, to the mayor of Nice’s office on Wednesday,

    But rest assured … Francois Hollande:
    “Nothing will make us give up in our will to fight terrorism – and we will reinforce in our actions in Syria and Iraq and we will continue to hit those who attack us on our soil in their homes.”

    Finally,perhaps the best eyewitness account of all …

    ‘Checking shoes’

    Simon Coates, a British lawyer on holiday in Nice, was cycling along the promenade with his wife back to their apartment after the fireworks when the lorry sped past them into the crowds. In the chaos he was separated from his wife.

    “I turned round and followed the path the lorry took checking the people killed to see if she was one of them,” he told the BBC.

    “I had to check every body and they were so disfigured the only reliable way I could check was to look for her bike and her shoes as most people were not recognisable.”

    “People were disembowelled, stripped naked of their clothes, mothers sprawled on the floor next to their dead children; one person was wrapped up like a Swiss roll with his arms and legs sticking out from his body which was folded back on itself,” he said.

    “When I caught up with the lorry it was stationary and an armed policeman was pointing a gun at the passenger side; others were taking cover and getting people away as they suspected a bomb.

    “I retraced my steps and thank God I found my wife unharmed at home.”

    • Wow wow wow. Thanks to Jskoolafish for the lead to the “Directorate” (a word you would think would give any frenchmen the creeps). Here is what it contained:

      “Le Figaro managed to obtain the copy of the document in which SDAT, citing articles of the criminal and penal codes, demands the city authorities delete “completely” nearly 24 hours of the attack captured on cameras on the Promenade des Anglais.

      “‘Delete the recordings between July 14, 2016 22:30 and July 15, 2016 18:00,’ the documents demands.

      “The anti-terrorist police named six cameras which recordings should be ‘particularly’ deleted. Plus the city authorities should delete any footage from any camera ‘that captured the crime scene’, the paper added.”


  3. Thank you, jskoolafish and Mary. Until I saw Dalia Mae’s second video clip, I thought we had one truck pictured in this event. I am now, not so sure. The truck in this clip appears to be larger than the other vehicles portrayed, and seems to have dual back axles. Hard to see, but replayed video clip many times. If this is the case, there could be up to four trucks displayed as the killer truck. Are we being played for suckers once again? I will now depict the possible four trucks, TRUCK (1): the one with front panel missing, from site of TomatoBubble.com , TRUCK (2): the one with unblemished passenger side door, as again at TomatoBubble and in Peekay’s video, TRUCK (3): parked truck at point of steep camber, with passenger window smashed and is definitely shorter than Dalia Mae’s truck, as per Peekay’s video and TRUCK (4): the one that to me appears to be larger than the rest.(Dalia Mae)
    I now pose an interesting question: Have any of the survivors or witnesses mentioned if they noticed if the windscreen had “bullet holes” while it was driving through the crowd? If so, then the “bullet holes in windscreen” are fake.
    Why would a peasant from a third world country use a near new truck to kill people, knowing that he himself would probably not survive? The cost of the hire or purchase of the said truck would be of no consequence to intelligence agencies that have no limit to finances. It will be interesting to see if the authorities trace where the truck was hired or purchased. (Silly me, it will be stolen) Actually that phrase “intelligence agencies” is an oxymoron if ever there was one. What other group of any species exists for the sole purpose of planning and executing the death of it’s own species, either singularly or by war?

    • Mal, you could out-peekay Peekay by making a short video that compares each of the 4 trucks.

      Four stolen trucks? I wonder where the front panel ended up.
      One of the trucks looks like the Ray Charleton (contactor at Hobart) mortuary truck.

      And here is my question: why does a person, whose mother tongue is not English, and who is standing there in the city of Nice, cry “my daughter, my daughter” in English?

      Mal, it is all so sloppy you have to wonder if they want us to be aware of what they are doing.

  4. I am getting more and more confused, the more I read about the Nice attack. So far I have not seen anybody actually hit by the truck in situ or bodies as the truck passed by. Nobody so far has announced “bullet holes” in windscreen, except for, after the truck was almost stopped.
    I cannot work out why people were running down the road, well in front of the truck, before it actually arrived on the scene.
    There appears to have been plenty of space to the side of the road, yet they were running down the centre of the roadway. In at least part of the “mile”, the road was divided by an island, yet they ran along in front of the truck, unless I am not reading the videos correctly. And of course the fact that some authorities want all the street video film destroyed, speaks volumes.

  5. Is not destroying evidence a criminal charge of “perverting the course of justice”? Sounds like an official should be charged with this offense in Nice, as he requested that all the street video film, be destroyed. I will not hold my breath though. The old saying, one law for them………

    • Mal, if you live in Victoria this would be your penalty:
      CRIMES ACT 1958 – SECT 254
      Destruction of evidence
      (1) A person who—
      (a) knows that a document or other thing of any kind is, or is reasonably likely to be, required in evidence in a legal proceeding; and
      (b) either—
      (i) destroys or conceals it or renders it illegible, undecipherable or incapable of identification; or
      (ii) expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorises or permits another person to destroy or conceal it or render it illegible, undecipherable or incapable of identification and that other person does so; and
      (c) acts as described in paragraph (b) with the intention of preventing it from being used in evidence in a legal proceeding—

      is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to level 6 imprisonment (5 years maximum) or a level 6 fine or both.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion