Will Fractional Magic Determine Our Destiny?

voting

by Dee McLachlan

I understand the term “Hollywood bookkeeping,” which is the term given to distributors that fiddle the numbers so that profit is never paid. For example:

Harry Potter and The Order of the Phoenix, the 2007 Warner Bros sequel, reportedly cost $150,000 million. It grossed $938.2 million worldwide. But years after release, it was still in the red by $167 million.

You see, being in the film industry, I have no faith in money “trickle down” or numbers making sense.

So when so much power and money is at stake, on who “owns” the Whitehouse, one can only expect shenanigans, and that they have worked out how–

“All political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors.” Black Box Voting.

I have always been suspicious about the voting systems, and Mary Maxwell writes in her book, Prosecution For Treason, about Jim Collier (“Electronic Hoodwink,” and co-author of Votescam, 1992) who described that

“[When you vote] an electronic impulse… is triggered…. The computer program immediately erases all record of the transaction except the result, which is subject to an infinite variety of switching…. “

But now in the US, it seems that you don’t need to erase computer votes, switch or bus in fraudulent or dead voters — all you need is maths.

Fractional Magic

I am still trying to get a full understanding of “fractional magic,” but it seems that a fairly simple, and hidden, system of calculating and updating votes can determine the outcome of any election.

Please explain!

GEMS election management system counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the US. As I understand it from Bev Harris from Black Box Voting, there is, hidden in the system, an application to pre-set a desired percentage outcome “to redistribute votes.” This is not visible to election observers — even while watching the computer adding up the votes.

The system counts the votes up – then allocates a PERCENTAGE of who is in front. But the decimal percentage point is NOT displayed.

So as I understand it — it counts the vote not as “1” — but could be “0.5” or “1.5”.

How Do fractions Work?

As Black Box Voting explains:

“They allow “weighting” of races.

Weighting a race removes the principle of “one person-one vote” to allow some votes to be counted as less than one or more than one. Regardless of what the real votes are, candidates can receive a set percentage of votes. Results can be controlled.

I am trying to wrap my head around this, but it seems that someone can get in and assign a desired outcome. They (one or a couple of people) are not actually doing anything, but allocating what a vote might be worth when counted. So when the votes come in, it allocates the vote as a fraction according to the desired result. But as the decimal points are hidden, observers are none the wiser.

Is this possible?

So has Hilary Clinton already won?

This was posted on The Unhived Mind IV:

“BUSTED, Here Are The Complete Rigged Election Results. Trump Loses.”

stolenelectionchattanooga1-1

“Worldnow is a central company that helps all the news stations stay synchronized so they all report the same news. This is a bust of that company, that already has the election results ready for the stations to post…”

Really?

But isn’t this whole election a nonsense anyway.

 

Advertisements

Comments

  1. Podesta Clinton Abramavic connection .
    You couldn’t make this stuff up . We truly live in sick days .
    Most people would not see it even if it was in their face .
    We have become sanatised by satanists .
    They are so confident they don’t care about releasing this days before the election .
    Tragic beyond explanation .
    No different here in Oz . Masonic halls in every suburb .
    “Same lie different face .” Prince .

    • FBI Agent Suspected in Hillary Email Leaks Found Dead in Apparent Murder-Suicide Denver Guardian Nov 5, 2016 (I found this at rumormillnews.com):

      Walkerville, MD – An FBI agent believed to be responsible for the latest email leaks “pertinent to the investigation” into Hillary Clinton’s private email server while she was Secretary of State, was found dead in an apparent murder-suicide early Saturday morning, according to police.

      Investigators believe FBI agent, Michael Brown, 45, shot and killed his 33-year-old wife, Susan Brown, late Friday night before setting the couple’s home on fire and then turning the gun on himself. Brown was a 12 year veteran of the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police Department before spending the last six years in the FBI.

      Neighbors saw smoke coming from the Brown residence and called 9-1-1 at approximately 11:50 p.m. By the time fire crews arrived on scene minutes later, the entire house was engulfed in flames.

      “Mrs. Brown’s death was caused by a gunshot wound prior to the house fire,” Walkerville Police Chief Pat Frederick said, “while Mr. Brown’s single-bullet head wound appears to have been self-inflicted.” [Maybe he had a grudge?]

      “The totality of the evidence leads us to believe this is a murder-suicide. We believe he killed her, set the house on fire and then took his own life,” Frederick said.

      The findings support conclusions by investigators Saturday that the couple perished in a murder-suicide during which the 4,000-square foot house was intentionally set on fire. Authorities outlined a likely scenario based on interviews with neighbors and comments posted on Mr. Brown’s Facebook page.

      • A execution style murder either by the FBI or CIA, Brown was in his prime of life with a wife and his beloved beagle, it makes no sense to execute his wife and shoot himself through the head and set his home alight and save the beagle? same as in Australia the cops executed a police officer and wife in Melbourne, no one has been found for this murder, this officer had security cameras and high walls, both found at time of execution as being in a knelt position, this was a day before a court appearance.
        Brown knew to much the Clintons are puppets of Wall Street, the establishment do not want Trump in as he is as yet a uncontrolled entity.
        Taking the beagle to a neighbors garden just does not add up? most beagle love this type of dog and are usually humanitarian having said that a dog owner of a beagle is terrified his beagle will bolt the only reason for this behavior is because this dog owner is neurotic, many dog owners are insane and drive their dogs to insanity, I do not think Brown was this type of owner, as he was to intelligent and most likely became a victim by default and the Clintons did not want him around as things were getting to hot for Brown to live.

  2. Terry Shulze says:

    The fractional system is a lot harder to detect than the old ‘switch the votes’ electronics scheme. I remember the 2000 election of Gore being ahead of Bush in Florida. Then all of a sudden there was a shift of something like 100,000 votes moved from Gore to Bush. The news commentators were taken back, but recovered with ‘well, these things happen’ – yeah, sure they do.

    Nowadays, they can just enter in the percentages they want in the computer program and there is no visible shift that occurs, it just happens automatically as the votes come in.

    Soros has already stated that Clinton will win. He also is involved with many of the voting machines that are going to be used.

    • Terry Shulze says:

      I’m hoping there are a bunch of ‘white hats’ at the NSA that have been monitoring the traffic to see how this whole fraud can be sprung. I also know from experience that they can also interfere with communications. It would be cool if they stuffed up what is being planned and then have the communications for subsequent prosecutions. Wow, just think, the NSA could actually act for national security (I won’t get my hopes up).

      Heck, since the NSA is monitoring ALL electronic traffic, they should have better data on the election results than anyone.

      • Brilliant Terry – had never thought of that. Yes… they should be able to track the actual votes.
        Maybe, just maybe something will come out of this.
        Of course, it would easy to create a computer system that could be honest… but why would they want to do that.
        The more I think about it, the more I believe that the voting system is a fraud. If you are able to manipulate the system – then you can guarantee it is being manipulated.

        • Terry Shulze says:

          Computers are honest. It is the garbage you put in them that gives you the garbage out.

          I used to be a computer engineer. Not only have I troubleshot down to the component level on complex mainframe systems, but I also wrote diagnostics in computer language. We didn’t play computer games, we liked to rework the code to make the games different. – it was more fun.

    • If Soros is involved with the machine? it will be a forgone conclusion.
      It would be like having the Mafia counting the votes.

  3. The story substantiates what Trump states, on this point alone Trump deserves to become president for exposing the truth on a serious and criminal situation that makes a mockery of democracy?
    Some years ago before I had heard of rigging votes I wrote this is a possibility before I came across any such inference as it seemed sacrilegious to even think corruption as such is possible? the thought came to me after talking to associates on outcomes of policy that seemed to contradict what were the thoughts of those who I checked out.
    Many individuals I know think all the political system as we know it today is that it is corrupt and the politicians know that and are free to pervert justice with impunity and get away with it.

    • Terry Shulze says:

      Yes, the political system is corrupt. However, the people that do the leg work to make the system work are not ‘politicians’. Those people, like the FBI that is presently in revolt, can blow the whole thing up if they decide they have had enough. I’m getting the impression that there is such a revolution going on. This election is much more interesting to me than just the political rhetoric and insults being thrown around.

Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: