by Elias Davidsson
[Editor’s note: This book review was written for mwcnews.net – the Media with Conscience News. I have lightly edited it. The author under review, Bruce Hoffman, was chosen by the Lindt Café Inquest to be its advisor on terrorism.]
The author, Bruce Hoffman, was for a long time a director at RAND Corporation in Washington, which he designates in his book as an “independent, objective, nonpartisan research institution” (p. xi). Bruce Hoffman is not only an author of junk science, but is periodically invited to comment on CNN, the Washington Post, etc, as an “expert” on terrorism.
I do not intend to provide a review of all the author’s scholarly sins, as this would require a volume exceeding in size the very book in review. I will limit myself to point to a few elements that demonstrate (a) the deceptive nature of the book; and (b) its utter lack of scholarly value.
(1) The deceptive appearance of erudition
Hoffman’s book (revised edition) consists of 432 pages. The author devotes no less than 45 pages to a bibliography on terrorism, a whopping 72 pages to footnotes and 18 pages for an index. This extraordinary accumulation of sources creates the outward appearance of erudition and comprehensiveness. Yet the bibliography omits major critical works on terrorism.
Thus, the author omits from his bibliography critical works on the events of 9/11, such as those by Prof. David Ray Griffin and Dr. Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed. Dr. Ahmed deals at depth with the covert relationship between Western intelligence agencies and al-Qaeda.
The same omission applies to critical studies regarding the London Underground Bombings of July 7, 2005, or to those of the Mumbai 2008 attacks. Any serious student of terrorism cannot avoid coming sooner or later across serious critical works which examine the forensics of various terrorist acts and governmental efforts to cover-up the events.
(2) Junk science
(a) Treatment of facts.
Good scientists are immediately recognized by the way they handle facts: They go to great pains to establish the empirical ground on which they base their theories. …When doubt about a fact exists, an honest scholar will share that doubt with readers and steer clear from sweeping assertions.
True scholars are also known to treat with circumspection statements by third parties, particularly when these parties do not report their own observations but merely what they have been told or had read. True scholars do not rely on unidentified and unverifiable sources.
There would be no purpose in harping on such commonplace rules of good scholarship, were it not for Mr. Hoffman’s systematic violations of these basic rules. I have stopped counting the unsubstantiated allegations made by him in his book and the number of cases where he relies on obviously dubious sources, such as on statements pronounced by a figure resembling Osama bin Laden on a video recording of dubious provenance.
(b) Disregarding the two most potent types of terrorism
The author is presented by mainstream media as an expert on terrorism, a designation that he does not dispute. Yet, from the three types of terrorism, he ignores completely the two main and most potent types: Overt state terrorism and false-flag terrorism.
False-flag operations are carried out secretly by military or police forces with the purpose to incite a population against a particular “villain.” False-flag operations are staged to appear as if they had been carried out by the “villain.” Due to the need to conceal the links between the perpetrators and state agencies, such operations require a high degree of secrecy and compartmentalization and are thus very complex. Substantial efforts are typically invested in the subsequent cover-up of such operations.
A classic case of false-flag terrorism was the burning of the Reichstag in Berlin in 1933, which was immediately seized by the new Nazi authorities to arrest communist and socialist leaders and establish a police state. False-flag operations are thus a distinct type of terrorism that calls for a completely different analytical approach than traditional or genuine terrorism.
The author not only ignores the very existence of false-flag terrorism but attributes all probable cases of such false-flag operations to al Qaeda … [He] not only confuses and misleads his readers, but engages in slander and contributes in his modest way to shield the true criminals of these operations.
(c) No assessment of terror investigations
As terrorism is essentially a violent form of political expression, it follows that states possess vital interests in either elucidating or concealing facts surrounding specific cases of terrorism. States are never neutral observers of such crimes. For that reason, a serious scholar will meticulously scrutinize the direction, manner and zeal of governments to investigate the crime.
States are actually duty-bound under human rights law to investigate cases of killings that occur within their jurisdictions. Such investigations must be carried out in good faith. State investigations into killings can be objectively assessed, using criteria of adequacy developed by the European Court of Human Rights, such as promptness, thoroughness, impartiality, the independence of the investigators and transparency.
States that fail to fulfill these criteria of adequacy can be presumed to act in bad faith. They call on themselves suspicion. Such presumption arises, for example, with regard to 9/11. Prof. David Ray Griffin wrote a book entirely devoted to the 9/11 Commission (“The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions”)
Bruce Hoffman’s discussion of terrorism relies almost entirely on either dubious terrorist sources or on allegations made by governments. The author does not even hint that some of these investigations of terrorist events may have been rigged, a charge made even by the chairman and vice-chairman of the 9/11 Commission after the Commission was disbanded.
(d) Hoffman and the story of Mohamed Atta’s suitcases
The story of Mohamed Atta’s two suitcases found at the Boston Airport on September 11, 2001, because they were not loaded onto the doomed aircraft, is well known. The story has been reported world-wide and used unsparingly to establish the official legend on 9/11.
Hoffman builds upon this legend to press his point that the 9/11 “hijackers” were motivated by religion. He thus wrote: “It only remains briefly to clarify the role religion played in the motivation of the hijackers. This can be seen very clearly in the ‘spiritual guide’ written for his accomplices by Mohammed Atta, the leader of the operation, and one of four pilots.”
Let us forgive the author for his harmless inaccuracies, such as the claim that the guide was found seven days after the attacks. Less forgivable is the author’s lack of intellectual curiosity. For one of the persistent questions regarding this episode is: What prompted Atta to drive to Portland on September 10, 2001 and fly from there back to Boston on an early-morning flight? Had his connecting flight from Portland to Boston been delayed, he wouldn’t be able to carry out the first attack on the World Trade Center, meaning that no TV channels would be on the spot to film in real-time the impact of the second plane’s impact. Atta’s “life mission” would be a fiasco.
Let us briefly describe what was found in Atta’s suitcases: When the police opened these suitcases, it found in them all the constituent elements for building the 9/11 legend: a portable electronic flight computer, a manual for aircraft simulators, a flight computer, a handwritten text in Arabic, a folding knife, pepper spray, three English grammar books, an Arabic- English dictionary, a bottle of perfume, three photographs, letters from the University of Cairo to Mohamed Atta, a picture of a visa, Alomari’s passport and much more.
Were all these items packed into the suitcase in order being found by investigators? Perhaps. But in that case, the packers could not have been the “terrorists” because they could not have expected their suitcases to be forgotten in Logan “by mistake.” Did the “terrorists”, then, pack these items in order that they are destroyed in the aircraft crash? Perhaps. But in that case, why did they pack a folding knife and pepper spray into the suitcases, instead of taking these tools along on their bodies for use in the hijackings? Neither explanation makes sense.
Bruce Hoffman does not consider the possibility that Atta’s suitcases and their contents might have been planted there to be found. Hoffman can, however, be forgiven for ignoring what Philip A. DePasquale, a baggage expediter at Logan Airport in Boston, told the staff of the 9/11 Commission staff on February 10, 2004, regarding these suitcases
(Source: FBI document 302-46163, quoted in MFR04016228 of the 9/11 Commission). DePasquale told the staffers that the suitcases carried a “covert tag from US Airways [in Portland] to warn that Atta and his luggage were a security issue.”
That means that someone at US Airways was told of Atta’s alleged “security threat” before the attacks had started. In other words: Someone knew who Atta was, monitored his movements and ensured that baggage handlers at Logan will retain Atta’s bags.
Readers may reflect upon DePasquale’s testimony and its implications regarding the events of 9/11.
(e) Terrorist “manuals”
On page 251 the author cites “manuals” for the wannabe terrorist, that were allegedly found by unidentified persons on undisclosed dates in unspecified Qaeda’s training camps in Afghanistan.
These “manuals” are cited by the author as a result of al Qaeda absorbing lessons “in order to help its operatives blend in in Western environments and avoid attracting attention.”
These manuals include advice such as:
- “Don’t wear short pants that show socks when you’re standing up. The pants should cover the socks, because intelligence authorities know that fundamentalists don’t wear long pants…
- Underwear should be the normal type that people wear, not anything that shows you’re a fundamentalist.
- Not long before traveling – especially from Khartoum – the person should always wear socks and shoes to [get] rid of cracks [in the feet that come from extended barefoot walking], which take about a week to cure…
- You should differentiate between men and women’s perfume. If you use women’s perfume, you are in trouble.”
It is interesting that the authors of these “manuals” used the term “fundamentalist” to describe their own movement. Is this how jihadists refer to themselves or were the authors perhaps half-baked orientalists working for RAND Corporation?
If the purpose of the “manuals” had been to help al Qaeda operatives “to avoid attracting attention” in Western environments, as argued by author Hoffman, consider the fact that the alleged 9/11 terrorists were repeatedly arrested in the United States for too fast driving and one of them even complained to the local police about being mugged.
Mohamed Atta once attracted unusual attention to himself by leaving a small aircraft in the middle of the runway of Miami airport, because he did not know how to restart the engine.
This would normally cause him to lose his flight license or trigger an inquiry. But not in his case. He apparently had some protectors at higher places. Author Hoffman blithely ignores all these widely reported facts, which would have seriously dented the theories he promotes.
My findings above confirm what German intellectual Reinhard Jellen once wrote, namely that “ignorance and pretension [are today] not obstacles, but on the contrary prerequisites for professional success.” That Hoffman’s book was published by Columbia University Press taints seriously the credibility of that publisher.
While utterly useless as a textbook on terrorism, Bruce Hoffman’s book can be profitably used by aspiring academic prostitutes. I first came across his book when I examined the activities of Germany’s Federal Center for Political Education (Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, or BpB).
That is a propaganda institution that belongs to the Ministry of the Interior. The BpB promotes Hoffman’s book (in its German translation) to German schools and universities as a textbook on terrorism.
— Elias Davidsson is the author of Hijacking America’s Mind on 9-111, which deals mainly with the phonecalls allegedly made by passengers and crew aboard the hijacked planes.