Home Boston J’accuse



abuAbu Ghraib – this is how we end up as a lawless culture.

by Mary W Maxwell

Using Tsarnaev’s Case As Basis for Real Indictments

I am 99% satisfied that Jahar Tsarnaev had nothing to do with bombing the Marathon, killing MIT Officer Sean Collier, carjacking Danny’s car, stealing Danny’s money, shooting at cops, throwing IEDs at anyone, running over his brother, going into a house in Watertown for a pee, or making any confession to interrogators at the hospital.

That being so, we should look for the actual perpetrators. I’ll sketch six crime scenes and ask who may be indicted.

Crime Scene 1: The Marathon finish line on April 15, ’13.

Some persons detonated a bomb that killed three: Martin Richard, age 8, Krystie Campbell, age 29, and Lu Lingzi, age 23, and injured 264 people, and damaged property.

Crime Scene 2: The MIT campus on April 18th around 10.20 pm. Officer Sean Collier was shot in his cruise car.

Crime Scene 3: The custody of FBI (wherever that happened to be located). After he was captured, unhurt, on Mt Auburn St Tamerlan Tsarnaev died.


“Leaked” mortuary photo. Tamerlan Tsarneav, RIP
[This picture, too, may have been photo-shopped.]

Crime Scene 4: The yard of David Henneberry’s house in Watertown, which contained his boat. Some combin-ation of local and state police, FBI, and perhaps military, shot 228 bullets at the boat on which they had ascertained that a warm body lay. When Jahar emerged from the boat someone allegedly attacked him with a knife.

Someone should be charged with the crimes of the shooting and the knifing. Both are attempted murder. There are laws against use of excessive force by authorities. To bring a criminal case would help the public find out if a shoot-to-kill policy exists. (And if it does, how to challenge that policy as unconstitutional.)

The 228 bullets may be said to have been necessary for the public welfare. This is contradicted by the fact that police say they suspected Jahar of carrying a bomb. Had police bullets hit the bomb an explosion may have harmed many people. In any case the knifing was unrelated to helping the public as Jahar was by then in captivity.

Crime Scene 5: The offices of media or others, including psychological operations planners who created the false story that has been used from the day of the event till now

Crime Scene 6: The Moakley Courthouse or other places where persons knowingly arranged to have an innocent person convicted of the Marathon bombing (and on whose account that man, Jahar, is to be executed).

Note: One can use the name John Doe in legal argument when one does not know the identity of the perpetrator or when it needs to be kept secret for the time being.

Massachusetts General Law, MGL

The MGL is divided into five parts. Part IV, ranging from Chapter 263 to 280, is about crime, punishment, and criminal procedure.  You can easily look up any crime under Massachusetts law and you will see the definition and the applicable fine and/or term of imprisonment.

I shall now list some criminals and cite the legal penalties. What kind of charges can be brought against a bomber of the Marathon, and what punishment can a jury impose? It is easy to answer that by looking at two documents from Jahar Tsarnaev’s case: the grand jury indictment and the jury’s verdict. It was found that Jahar murdered Krystie Campbell by bombing. And murdered Collier by shooting.

The MGL stipulates the punishment for murder as life imprisonment; Massachusetts has no death penalty.

As for the alleged 264 other persons who were hurt by schrapnel on Boylston St, the person setting the bombs can be charged with grievous bodily harm. As for property damage, MGL Chapter 266, S 126A sets the penalty of 2 years imprisonment, and loss of driver’s license for 1 year.

(Note: Judge O’Toole also ordered Jahar to pay $101 million restitution. That’s under federal forfeiture law.)

Regarding the killing of Tamerlan, this would be found to be a murder, unless information were brought forth to show accidental death. (Note: It’s possible that the story of Tamerlan being run-over accidentally was proposed so that no court would have to discuss this awkward matter.)

It is worth looking at the murder of Ibraghim Todashev, by the FBI, to see how that event was reported to show the killer’s actions as having been done in self-defense. It happened in Florida. That state could have, and should have, charged the FBI man with the crime of murder and let him tell his story. Self-defense is a defense in court.

Instead the FBI was allowed to conduct its own invest-igation and “cleared the man.” Recall the maxim “Nemo judex in causa sua debet esse” — no judge can be the judge in his own case. Maxims are not enforceable as such. But as no case was brought, no one even got to bring up the Nemo point.

Out-of-State (Possible) Crime Scene: Virginia

Two special agents of the DoJ, Christopher Lorek and Stephen Shaw, worked in “hostage rescue”. It is rumored that they were killed because they saw Jahar’s throat being cut at the boat side. Moti Nissani mentions this in Exhibit E. Pretty serious stuff: it consisted of dropping the two men off a helicopter into the sea. “They died on impact.”

Note that we don’t know who ordered that murder, if it was a murder, so the person to charge would be the boss of the DoJ at that time (a month after the Marathon), namely Eric Holder. Possibly the state of Virginia could bring a case against a John Doe who organized the training episode in which Lorek and Shaw died.

Here again we see an issue of federalism and also a problem of the balance of powers within a state or at the federal level.  The performers of much violence – some justified some not — is done by government.  How do you get an indictment against government? A remark on the government website of Massachusetts says:

The Attorney General’s Civil Rights Division enforces and safeguards Constitutional and statutory civil rights and liberties on behalf of Massachusetts residents and visitors and “may bring enforcement action.”

I mentioned in Chapter 28 that the family of Tamerlan can bring a federal lawsuit for police brutality under the Civil Rights law. In 1966 Congress passed civil rights laws that cover instances of racial or other discrimination and also protect everyone in the US against brutality committed “under color of law.” See 42 USC 242.

Note that the above quote from Maura Healey’s office says visitors are protected, too. I assume a case can be brought by the elderly aunts of Jahar who were greeted at the airport by FBI and given the ankle bracelets for no apparent reason. They were visitors, not suspects. And the Attorney General herself can “bring enforcement action.”

Now Back to Crimes Scenes 5 (Media) and 6 (Court)

Scene 5 harbors the persons who spread the false story. In my discussion of The Boston Globe, in Chapter 18, it was noted that lying is not a crime, but if Globe personnel helped plan the terror event they are accomplices to murder. (Punishment: prison for life.)

And who penned Jahar’s confession on the boat wall? Someone did it. Yet he/she can’t be charged with perjury.


I personally accuse Jeff Bauman of having only pretended that his leg amputation postdates the Marathon. (It pre-dated it, as he is clearly seen lying on the ground holding onto a large thigh covering, into which is built a bloody femur and no fibula). Note: I can be sued for accusing a person of a crime –but he did not commit a crime by “play-acting.”

Possibly he committed the crime of fraud in connection with his “fund.” I see there was a prosecution of a girl who falsely claimed she was injured at Marathon and tried to get money.  I bet her case was fake intended to show that someone somewhere is guarding the truth, and that the legitimate fund-collectors are not to be criticized.

Scene 6, My Accusations

Now we turn to Crime Scene 6. This book has been focusing on the court. I had recently researched two other cases — the Port Arthur massacre and the Sydney siege – so was acutely aware of how the bad behavior of courts is a giveaway as to the guilt of government.

Maybe the murders in Crime Scenes 1 to 4 above are more terrible than the crimes performed in court. But my focus is on the way a lack of justice is killing us all. Please see the list of “crimes against justice” written by Sir William Blackstone’s in 1769. Wow. It is Exhibit L below.

Blackstone notes that a conspiracy to falsely accuse an innocent man used to carry an odd punishment. Namely, the aggrieved party (say, Jahar) would be granted a “villainous judgment.”  That meant he could go to the property of his harmers and have “their lands wasted, their houses razed, and their trees rooted up.”

As far as the crimes of Scene 6 (Court) are concerned, I personally accuse Danny of perjury. He changed his story so many times that it can’t be true. I must likewise accuse anyone who suborned his perjury. I take that to be the prosecutor, Carmen Ortiz.

I accuse US Attorney General Loretta Lynch of arranging for potential defense witnesses, such as Silva and Dias, to be imprisoned so the public could not communicate with them as to Jahar’s innocence. Intimidating a witness is of course a crime. But Lynch committed further crimes of obstruction of justice by setting Silva up for drug crimes.

I accuse Lynch also of imposing SAM’s on Jahar while in Supermax Prison. It is clear that her goal is to render him incommunicado. Not only does that offend his rights but is itself the crime of cover-up, is it not?

I accuse the first-name-only visitors to Russia (can you imagine), Charlene, Olga, Jane, who had the unmitigated cheek to tell the Tsarnaev family that they should go along with the conviction despite innocence. And Alicia.

Are those four ladies quite young?  Do they think the rule is for them to obey the boss? Wrong. In law you don’t get off the hook because you obeyed a superior. It is very pathetic if they think they “did the right thing.” Ignorance of the law is no excuse, so they may end up in prison.

Recall that Uncle Dzhamaly met Alicia from the defense.

“I asked Alicia to explain why the defense was not using in the court proceedings the commonly known facts of the non-involvement of the brothers. …I [reminded her of] the necessity to involve all potential witnesses, whom under various pretexts the FBI had isolated, so that they are not allowed to testify in favor of the defendant.”

Dzhamaly told Alicia he had documents proving Jahar’s innocence and would bring them to court himself. She asked, “How do you intend to bring them into the USA?”

“At that time, US visas were supposedly being arranged. Alicia on the previous visit in February 2015 had collected from us the information, passport details and photos of me and my sister, Roza Tsarnaeva. Later, Alicia repeatedly consulted with us, saying “you will be able to travel.” After my conversation with Alicia held on April 14, 2015 in Moscow, the Tsarnaevs were refused entry visas.”

General Law of Massachusetts, Chapter 268 section 13 E:

(b) Whoever alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, … shall be punished, by a fine of not more than $10,000, or by imprisonment for not more than 5 years…

See? The law contains all that is needed to sort things out.



      • The Atlantic (which has gone to hell lately) wrote a story about Lynddie England. She said of the Arab prisoners:

        “Their lives are better,” she told the iPad newspaper. “They got the better end of the deal. They weren’t innocent. They’re trying to kill us, and you want me to apologize to them? It’s like saying sorry to the enemy.”

        Apologetic or not, England is certainly struggling to recover. She works for an old family friend during tax season doing basic accounting but otherwise can’t find anyone to hire her. This makes it difficult to raise her seven-year-old son, especially since the boy’s father Charles Graner, whom The Daily calls “ringleader of the Abu Ghraib abuses,” refuses to acknowledge his existence.

        • The Independent says:
          “In an unprecedented move, the President-elect’s team are reported to have demanded ambassadors appointed by Barack Obama to leave their overseas posts by Inauguration Day on 20 January. The decision to provide no grace period for politically appointed ambassadors marks a significant break with decades of tradition.”

          Openings! Openings! I want the Holy See.
          Gotta talk to Francis about you-know-what.

    • “IF the courts are not controlled by the perpetrators”…which they are.

      These people were all actors (meaning participants) in a fraud who aided and abetted the criminal government and/or its contractors and accomplices. Unfortunately, the people behind the fraud are currently the keepers of the law. I hope very strongly that this situation will not exist for long.

  1. Well, this is a nice New Year surprise. The last I saw of Cherri’s petition it had 2,450 signatures and now it has 3,161. Yay!

    Also, today the Fringe accepted my ad for the March 15th Adelaide Fringe, with an ad that mentions “false flag” and which will appear in Rupe’s very first newspaper, known as the ‘Tiser. This breaks Dee’s claim that the term FF never appears in MSM.

    Newbies to Gumshoe, kindly do ol’ Martin a favor and sign this thing:


  2. I am very lucky. On Jan 5, 2017, Paul Craig Roberts posted an item on his website entitled “Murdering the Innocent in Order to Support the Lie”. He says:

    “It is clear beyond reasonable doubt that there was no real bombing at the Boston Marathon and that the alleged terrorist event, using crisis actors, [re] a “Muslim threat.” The entire foreign policy of the United States in the 21st century is based on an orchestrated “Muslim threat.”

    “[There was] a manhunt with intent to kill a young man chosen as the villain for the orchestrated event. American citizens were forced at gunpoint out of their homes while Homeland Security, a Nazi reminiscent name, disrupted the life of an entire city….

    “The entire exercise was based on a lie, an event that never happened, like Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction, Assad’s use of chemical weapons, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and so forth. Just another lie in behalf of the “exceptional people.”

    “Now comes forward an attorney, Mary Maxwell with a book. It is available online free. I read the first eight chapters, which was sufficient to confirm me in my independent conclusion that there was no Boston Marathon bombing by terrorists….

    “Any US citizen that believes the falsified case of the Boston Marathon bombing is a dangerous and direct threat to American civil liberty and to the lives of millions of people on planet Earth. [!!!!!]

    “If Americans do not wake up to the orchestrations to which they are subjected, they … will not be able to prevent Earth’s destruction in thermo-nuclear war.”

    — Whew! And as Gumshoe readers know, it was from Paul Craig Roberts’s website that we got our first info about Aunt Maret (thanks to Jack Graham who helped her file her affidavit.)

  3. Mary cooking with gas!
    Possibly, but more like, with napalm burning the skin off the msm, politicians and shock joke fakes and not finding a spine or backbone.
    I follow PCR, mainly at the informationclearinghouse information site where he has a current article (yesterday?)
    In your face …….. fakes! You too our ABC and SBS.
    I note that the ABC is advertising for a chair; ..man, woman, person or something in between for the ABC.
    The successful candidate better not be just another fake, wasting our billion per year on the likes of the Faine et.al., BS overseeing globalist lies and warmongering resulting in the killing of millions and the destruction of numerous countries resulting in millions of refugees invading Europe…… and paddling here sponsored publicly under the do gooder left wing fraudulent spivs.

    • May I add that the do-gooder refugee advocates whom, never to my knowledge, acknowledge that 911 was a false flag, or indeed that false flags are government policy and that according to General Wesley Clarke reported in 2007 that there was a pre 911 plan to go invade and kill in 7 countries in five years……ending with Syria and Iran. (Putin stuffed tbat up)
      Ever hear Senator Hanson-Young comment on the reality. What about you, Senator Rhiannon?
      Senator Hinch, you woken up yet?
      As for Turnbull, Shorten and Bishop et. al., you have a problem. The serial government lies and misinformation propaganda are openly exposed…….. how disappointing for your banker controllers, people do not want to be cannon fodder and have their kids fight your banker wars. Look up ‘war is a racket’ by Major General Smedley Butler from about 1933.
      The fake journos ignore him for the benefit of the globalists and their banker controllers to defraud their readers and audience.

    • There are so few movies that I care to watch these days, but this is one film I will NEVER want to see. It has to be 100% propaganda or else it would not have been made. I’m amazed that the actors agreed to be a part of it. Their participation diminishes their reputations in my view. I’d be ashamed.

    • On the other hand, whenever the truth finally comes out, this will help to demonstrate the “government” propaganda machine and how closely “Hollywood” works with the fake justice department to manipulate the population.

    • Hello. I just popped over to Cherri’s pettion at cgange.org re Port Arthur and found these 10 new comments:

      shane jensen. Australia, 2 hours ago
      We deserve to know the whole story of that terrible day.

      peter bucknell. Brookton, Western Australia, 4 hours ago
      real evidence proves he was not the only shooter & news prove JOHN COWARD stopped money to state unless they signed his bill

      Ziggy Wolski. Australia, 3 days ago
      Because this is a setup, all preplanned by other vested interest groups to disarm Australian citizens

      Stephen Brasher. Australia, 3 days ago
      I’m not sure that Bryant is innocent, but I’m not certain he’s guilty either. The repercussions of Port Arthur are still with us, and that means there should have been a proper inquest at the time. There still needs to be one now.

      Tammy Ogston. Australia, 4 days ago
      Because he is innocent and the people know it.

      Joe Carapellotti. Australia, 4 days ago
      There are too many questions that need answering. Many believe he’s innocent of all charges

      Susie Grey. Australia, 4 days ago
      I agree there should be a coronial inquest into this for all of our sakes!!

      Mick Christensen. Australia, 7 days ago
      I want the Truth to be told

      Jeremy Pearce. Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam, 7 days ago
      This was a false flag government operation to allow gun law reform. Martin was the patsy. We need an inquest followed by his release

      Cameron Buchan. Australia, 1 week ago
      After watching and listening to information out there. It seems the whole actions taken place that day and years leading up that it was a fabricated event so as to get the outcome desired.

      Isn’t that nice?

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion