Home Society Thirteen Reasons Why I Am a Holocaust Revisionist

Thirteen Reasons Why I Am a Holocaust Revisionist



Is any part of the 20th century historical record accurate?

by Mary W Maxwell

Many people want to have a second look, a critical look, at the 7-decade old narrative of the Nazi killing of Jews en masse.

Here are thirteen reasons why I want to have a critical look.

  1. In my high school in 1964, we were taught the “fact” that the cause of World War I was the 1914 assassination, in Sarajevo, of Austria’s archduke Francis Ferdinand. (Remember that one?)
  2. In Hobart in 1996, a young left-hand shooter was easily convicted of having killed many people at Port Arthur by shooting them very accurately with his right hand (Martin Bryant).
  3. In Germany, the female lawyer for revisionist Ernst Zundel was imprisoned for trying to defend him against the charge of “Holocaust denial” (Sylvia Stolz—she was physically carried out of the courtroom by guards in 2006).
  4. During World War II, before a cure for typhus was found, there were epidemics of typhus. The pesticide Zyklon B was widely in use to kill the fleas that were carrying typhus.
  5. In the 1990s, the museum at the Auschwitz concentration camp in Poland officially lowered its claim of the number of persons who died there, from 4 million to 1.5 million.
  6. The United States, during Lyndon Johnson’s presidency, denied that the crew of the US ship Liberty had been deliberately killed by Israelis.
  7. A man spent 3 months in prison in Australia, in 2009, for continuing to post anti-Semitic material on his Adelaide Institute website after a court told him to remove it (Fredrick Toben).
  8. Philip Roth’s 2004 novel The Plot against America shows how the people of the US could wrongly start to persecute Jews for anything, based on a rumor.
  9. Professional, paid witnesses at the 1945-1949 Nuremberg trials were relied upon for data about the Holocaust.
  10. A French historian was convicted, by a court in France, for his speech at the 2006 Teheran International Conference on the Holocaust (Robert Faurrison). The conference had invited persons with any point of view to state their case.
  11. In numerous publications of the 1920s and 1930s it was claimed that 6 million Jews were killed in the first World War.
  12. In Boston, the FBI created a hilarious case against a young lad for doing the bombing of the 2013 Marathon (Jahar Tsarnaev).
  13. An elderly lady in Germany has to fight for the right to talk about the loss of huge numbers of Christian people from her city of Breslau in the 1940s (Ursula Haverbeck).

Where I Came into This Subject Matter

  1. Fools’ Paradise

As you can see from #1, 2, and 12, I am inclined to historical revisionism of any kind, given that we now know how easy it is for a whole nation to be fooled.

Millions of Australians in 1996, including myself, accepted unquestioningly that Martin Bryant was the Port Arthur massacre gunman.  Earlier, the whole world had accepted that Lee Harvey Oswald (who once defected to Russia – “a hot clue!”) was the assassin of JFK.

And regarding the “Archduke Ferdinand” bit in our textbooks, the basic truth wasn’t revealed until 2014, in a book by Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor entitled Hidden History.

That is, it took a full century for people to learn the simple facts about the origin of World War I. (Namely, a coterie of Brits arranged the war.)

  1. Evidentiary Matters

As you can see from #4, 5, 9, and 11, there are also many tidbits of research showing that the standard depiction of the Holocaust has real problems.

Many years ago I came across the figure “6 million Jewish deaths” in a book published around 1928. It gave me pause, but as there was no public discussion going on, and I didn’t know what to make of it, I filed it away as just a curiosity.

For strict methodologists, let me acknowledge that even a large number of documents stating incorrectly that 6 million Jews died in WWI do not PROVE that at a later date 6 million “didn’t die.”

Likewise, the use of Zyklon B as an ordinary pesticide does not of itself tell us that such a chemical is never used as a murder weapon. All possibilities should be given an airing.

  1. Whatever Happened to Free Speech?

Still, when citizens and scholars yak about those evidentiary matters and land in jail for so doing, you have to wonder how much of a suppression apparatus is out there.

I feel moved by the persons in #3, 7, 10, and 13 — perhaps especially by the French guy, Faurrison, since he does not even have the impetus of feeling wronged as a Kraut, he being a Frog.

(Note: “political correctness” disgusts me intellectually.)

My Secret Motives

That said, I have another more general motivation to go revisionist, and that is to protect my Jewish friends. It looks to me that this crackdown on revisionist historians has a long-term aim of stoking the flames against every Jew!

In the list above, the only hint of this is at #8.  Philip Roth’s book casually portrays, in fictional form, the way a people can turn against a “created” enemy. In that book, the false enemy consisted of American Jewry – hence all Americans citizens were expected to report on them and denounce them.

In my lifetime I have seen two cooked-up enemies presented to us as worthy of our hostility – Communists and Muslims. And we the people humbly obeyed that command to hate “pinko’s and ragheads.” So it’s clear to me that Roth’s (fictional) prophecy could come true.

I realize Jews are fond of pointing out that ever since the Middle Ages they have been shunted around. I believe that’s accurate history. Various rulers – usually monarchs in those days – would write a decree to oust all Jews from the country. Or at least keep them in ghettos outside the city walls.

Had the Jews (or their leaders) done something to deserve this treatment? Possibly they did, in some instances. In other instances there may have been strategic reasons for such decrees that in no way justified turning folks into refugees.

In any case, let’s never fail to register the all-important tactic of the powerful:  nominate an internal enemy in order to take accusatory eyes off themselves!

So Let Me Speak

There – you see I’m not a nutter who has to get wedded to every conspiracy theory on the Internet, and I am not a lurking Jew-hater. I’m just a nice elder-age critic (of anything).

In the last few years I have laboriously argued against truth-seekers who believe that “it’s the Jews” who are causing all the bad things in this world.

Granted, the Rothschilds – who do happen to be Jewish, but could have been anything else – are major causes of our troubles through their clever weapon: banking.  I’ll put money on that.

My pet theory – and it can only be a pet theory given all the secrecy – is that there is a well-structured world government, and its players are ruthless to the nth degree.

Research into organizations such as the Bilderbergers, the Council on Foreign Relations, or the Tavistock Institute, strikes me as very valuable. Pretty soon we should be able to find out who the top bosses are and their means of keeping their minions in check. (I wish more minions would look for a way out.)

Three Lousy Effects

Meanwhile, to say “It’s the Jews” has lousy effects. I’ll name three.

First and foremost, it shuts down the search. So if perchance the world is run by some other ethnic group (though I, for one, think it isn’t an ethnic group), we will miss our chance to identify it.

Here I take aim at Ken O’Keefe who does a really helpful job of lining his ducks up in a Youtube video (the ducks being Hebraic, to a man). I sincerely think O’Keefe does a sincere good job. He tells us what he knows. But he doesn’t bother to say that he may be missing certain things. It all sounds tightly wrapped up and final. Not good.

Second, to say “the Jews” are doing all the bad things leave us without a name we can drag into court. Of course if you say the offending Jew is Mr So-and-So – for example Larry Silverstein, the leasor of the WTC on 9-11– well, OK. That’s a name you can file charges against. Or his Australian co-leasor Frank Lowy.

Such charges could be filed against those two men without the slightest reference to their Jewishness. But some people seem to think Larry and Frank did 9-11 because of their Jewishness. That creates a logical problem: namely how can we account for the motives of Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney?

Surely – surely – Rummy and Cheney have blood on their rotten little mitts for the 9-11 deaths.

Third, since everyone has been intimidated about “anti-Semitism,” there is a more complicated problem related to pinning the blame.  People shy away from naming any 9-11 player with a Jewish name! THEN they think “Oh well, we’re blocked from handcuffing anybody, so let’s just swallow the idea that 9-11 bygones are bygones.” Eeks!


Justice Alvin Hellerstein, in charge of all 9-11 cases

Alvin Hellerstrin, US District Court judge for the Southern District of New York, has singlehandedly shut down all litigation that might up-end the theory of the 19 Muslim hijackers. Do you think Hellerstein does this because he is Jewish? Maybe he himself thinks he does it for Jews’ sake but I don’t think that is really why he does it!

Note: I think many Jewish Americans think “the Jews” did 9-11. That is really bad for them; they are probably waiting for a Philip Roth-type pogrom to start. I wish they’d come out and say “Hey, brethren, we’ve got oodles of moral principle and can knock off this nonsense right now.” Or better ye come out and say “I know I’m not guilty and I am mad keen to find out who is.”

Here is a way we can get past this loggerheads situation. I recommend we indict 6 people immediately for 9-11. Just for the hell of it let’s seek 6 indictments with one of the indictees being a Jew, one a Muslim, and 4 Christians. That won’t be too uncomfortable will it?

USS Liberty, Anyone?

Finally, to #6 on my list of 13 reasons why I am a Holocaust revisionist (actually, a revisionist wannabe).  Namely, President Johnson stayed mum – or actually lied – when the Israeli military tried to sink a US ship. That occurred on June 8, 1967 during the Six-day war. Thirty-four US crew members died.

We have somehow been prevented all these years from taking any action against the killers, or even from having officials of the US government admit what really transpired.

Would that have been the case if the nation attacking the ship had been China, France, or New Zealand? No. It wouldn’t.

So what’s the difference?  Follow my logic. I myself have trouble blaming Israel for various things, as the taboo is so strong. But is it reasonable for the US to let an attacker of an American ship go scot-free because we’re tongue-tied by the “don’t be an anti-Semite” rule?

Now get a load of this. I happen to think it was someone other than “the state of Israel” that ordered that attack on the USS Liberty. So – follow the further logic here — a genuine villain can do terrible things while hiding behind the coattails of Israel or “the Jews.” Eeks!


  1. I recommend that we look into the sinking of the Liberty with the question “Who did it, and why?”
  2. As stated, I recommend we indict a few folks for 9-11.
  3. I recommend we look into the Holocaust-denial literature with the question “Who has slammed the researchers down and why?”

The answers could be very surprising. Or they may not be surprising. But who’s to know until we investigate?

— Mary W Maxwell has a PhD in Politics. She is addicted to research. Email mary at ProsecutionForTreason.com.


photo credit of Hellerstein: 3pb. blogsspot.com





  1. Well done Dr Maxwell – now you could also speculate as to why your insightful written submission for my August 2009 Federal Court appeal was rejected by the three non-Jewish judges.

    If you go to the following, I think my comment about it is telling:
    Arbeit mach frei: impertinent incarceration -http://www.toben.biz/docs-2/

    Read on – http://www.toben.biz/amf/

    Download PDF: Arbeit_Macht_Frei FT –

    Chapter 10 A Friend of the Court p. 132
    >>I recall that Spender refused to accept Dr Maxwell’s submission on the grounds that my defence counsel could have made it. This reasoning does not make sense because an Amicus Curia Brief is supposed to come from an independent source, someone who has not taken sides in this adversarial

    • Fredrick, it’s on a par with Judge O’Toole agreeing with the prosecutor Carmen Ortiz, a Spic (i.e., Puerto Rican-born) that Jahar not be permitted to see autopsy photos of the three people he “killed.”

      There the judge was a Catholic bog-trotter (like myself) and the “patient”, Jahar, Muslim. Not a Jew in sight. Hatred of the law by its top practitioners. Wow.

      All because they are slaves to World Gubmint, I reckon. So you see why the emphasis on Hebes drives me crazy?

      As for my submitting an amicus in your case in 2009 (seems so long ago now), what really pissed me off was that I bought a bank check for the $277 filing fee, and the court clerk said “No, wait to see if the judge plans to accept your Amicus.” Then after the judge decided not to use my amicus they billed me for the $277.

      i’m like Huh?

      • I got this from RT on Peter’s website. A bit rich for the blood:

        “Soros’ letter begins: “The world has been unsettled by a surge in forced migration. Tens of millions of people are on the move, fleeing their home countries in search of a better life abroad. Some are escaping civil war or an oppressive regime; others are forced out by extreme poverty ….

        “This is quite true. And Soros should know since his think tank is fully on board with that “forced migration”. He has either initiated it or facilitated it and, according to Viktor Orban, Prime Minister of Hungary [who said]: “Soros’ name is perhaps the strongest example of those who support anything that weakens nation states, they support everything that changes the traditional European lifestyle.”

        “These activists who support immigrants inadvertently become part of this international human-smuggling network.”

        Note: i don’t agree with the last sentence. If you put yourself in the shoes of the refugee, who cares if Soros organized it? Just put Soros in jail where he belongs. Talk about criminal!

      • Not a Jew in sight? Maybe they were confidant enough to leave early and let the hired help lock up knowing the system was self perpetuating.

        • When they are the money changers they don’t have to hang out on the play ground. No other profession trickles down like the one that decides how much a judges salary is or graft paid in what formula of currency. Math is the purest empirical evidence. What percentage of what race holds the majority of CEO, CFO, or ownership status in Money creation/ Central Ban-King and TV media? Why Cheney and other non-yids the world over perform for the yids? Because the value of their power is printed or digitally controlled by the congregation of the Synagogue of Satan. Yeshua called out the Jew-ish and not the Israelites let us be clear.

          • See, Everybody? This is what I mean when I refer to the Philip Roth projection of a modern persecution of the Jews. “Ghana” is probably on the payroll to create Jew-hatred.

            OK, my article now has 52 comments and I am not going to continue to respond as I need to get on with it.

            I urge everyone to put the issue in the past. and get on with it.
            There DEFO were no gassings in Auschwitz and therefore any “survivor” who says there were is engaging in an exercise to harm us all.
            Please. Start studying fracking or the bombing of Gaza or GMO food or something real. I’m outta here.

  2. Language use is difficult. There is the letter of the word and there is the spirit of the word. When I say the Americans invaded Iraq I am not referring to all Americans but rather those in America who are exerting power and influence and initiated the violence.

    People use this language as short hand (lazy) way to point blame but leaving themselves open to be misinterpreted.

    In the same way when we say the Jews are responsible for certain actions we do not mean all Jews. When one has control of money creation is there anything one can not do?

    • OK, David, thanks for your helpful comment.

      So let’s call this particular category of humanoids PEEPSINCONTROLOFMONEYCREATION. Then we won’t have to waste time searching the Talmud or analyzing the number 66 plus 911 backwards, to see what’s going on. Just plain ol’ “money-creation.”

      Kevin Woodman loves to tell me there is a goat head on the roof of Parliament House in Canberra. I say SO WHAT? If the idiots under that roof are committing treason, they are committing treason regardless of any stupid-ass goat head.

      (Why is Mary using stronger-than-usual language today? i think it’s because the Pizzagate thing has made me loose ALL inhibitions. I’d better sign off before I say something I’ll regret.)

      And thank-you to Dee (a “white South African” — oooh) for creating this lovely club.

        • On June 8, 2015, Gumshoe published my article about Haverbeck “Ursula Is a Breath of Spring.” Here is an interesting comment sent that day by Eddy:

          Awesome article. I myself was born in Germany to German parents who migrated to Australia after the war. As a child, I was exposed to racial vilification by many Australians, adults, teachers and children. I was told I was evil, war mongering and deserve everything I got. Not a day went by where I did not have to physically defend myself from assault on my way to or from school. Adults and officialdom simply were not interested.

          This treatment generated within me a quest during my lifetime, to discover the truth, to do so, I started by joining the Australian defence force and found myself in Vietnam defending Australia from the supposed ravages of hordes from Asia who were intent upon invading Australia and spreading their evil Communism here. We were seen off, by no less that the Mayor of Townsville and ever Christian denomination head at their various churches in Townsville. I distinctly recall everyone of these alleged Christians telling us all we were doing Gods work. LOL. Seriously.
          My arrival in Vietnam at the ripe old age of 18 years of age was the beginnings of my quest to find the truth, and within three months I learnt that everything we had been told by the authorities in Australia, and that includes the so called Christian churches and their leaders, WAS A LIE !

  3. Point 3 – Sylvia Stolz speech – (a bit slow but worth persevering)

    • Holocaust: when truth is outlawed (Sylvia Stolz speech)

    Points 5 and 11 – the Six Million

    The reports of the PRECISE figure of 6,000,000 jews suffering, being persecuted or victims of a holocaust go as far back as around 1870 and certainly the term ‘holocaust’ was being published BEFORE WWII. For example:

    • SIX MILLION JEWS 1915-1938 HD

    A related graphic with snapshots of morepublished articles …
    * http://s1117.photobucket.com/user/WhiteWolf722/media/TheSixMillionMyth.jpg.html

    Interesting indeed ! … ?

      • Mary, I had saved that image as a jpg from a comment on Disqus a while back and managed to right click and open the hyperlink attached to that source. The best I can suggest is save as jpg and resize the best you can. In any case, it is only an indicative snapshot (uncertified – you can’t see the detailed source of newspaper). It reminded me of the ten articles that are very carefully cited in the video just above from ‘TheTrans22’ channel.

        • James O’Neill might enjoy the punch line here, about the Nuremberg trials:

          “In the years since, distinguished figures in both the United States and other countries have expressed similar views. US Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas wrote: “I thought at the time and still think that the Nuremberg trials were unprincipled. Law was created ex post facto to suit the passion and clamor of the time.”

          “US Rear Admiral H. Lamont Pugh, former Navy Surgeon General and Commanding Officer of the National Naval Medical Center, wrote: “I thought the trials in general bordered upon international lunacy. I thought it particularly unfortunate, inappropriate, ill-conceived and dupably injudicious that the United States should have been cast in the leading role as prosecutors ….

          In the New Republic:
          “The whole majesty of the Western heritage of the law was used to subvert that heritage in the Nuremberg Tribunal. Weighty jurists in every Western country (but not Russia) protested against this travesty of the Western legal system. So did historians. So did merely cultured and moral men and women. If the victors were to “try” the vanquished for war crimes, then they should try themselves for often committing the same crimes. Who would try [British] Air Chief Marshal Sir Arthur Travers “Bomber” Harris, the architect of the policy of saturation bombing of German cities?

          “A new age of international justice had begun, it was claimed. Many sincerely believed that the four Allied powers would themselves abide by the Tribunal’s standards.”

          • Fast forward to the present and Governor Moonbeam of California passes a direct violation of the Nuremberg Code as law…., for the children. lol We imported more than “rocket science” during “Operation Paperclip”. lol

  4. “Alone the fact that one may not question the Jewish “holocaust” and that Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions—while incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same averredly incontestable ‘holocaust’ occur—gives the game away. It proves that it must be a lie. Why else would one not be allowed to question it? Because it might offend the “survivors”? Because it “dishonors the dead”? Hardly sufficient reason to outlaw discussion. No, because the exposure of this leading lie might precipitate questions about so many other lies and cause the whole ramshackle fabrication to crumble.”

    “Those ultimately responsible for this hopeless situation have succeeded in their conspiracy: they have created, with the aid of “holocaust” professionals and propaganda, the necessary climate of guilt whereby never-ending legal as well as illegal immigration goes unchallenged, resulting in a fractured society, civil unrest and inadequate social funds. The desired massive debt is therefore programmed. Jewish influence has achieved the dissolution of a once cohesive community.”

    From ‘Tell the Truth & Shame the Devil’ (By Gerard Menuhin – 2015) (son of violinist Yehudi)

    Cited here:

  5. There’s only one answer to conundrum. The authorities know that. To discuss this issue and compile documentation that is irrefutable would shoot down this claim in seconds.
    For that simple, plain reason, we have been isolated, and authoritarian law placed upon us disallowing any rational discussion on the matter.
    That fact alone, is the biggest red flag on the whole issue.
    Why are people being targeted as criminal, simply because they wish to challenge the claim that 6 million Jews died.
    B.T.W. it would also seem, that on the back of this very spurious claim, a certain nation seems to have raked in billions of dollars, (which if I’ve read the reports correctly, never did get passed on to the survivors ) and even free military equipment.
    To now turn around and prove via historical documents that the claim is bunkum, would throw a serious spanner into the equation of that nation.
    Some web site of relevance ;
    Boy, Were You Ever Wrong By Patrick Grimm
    Breaking The Spell, The Holocaust Myth and Reality.
    Britain’s Great War Pledge To Lord Rothschild
    By Robert John
    The Jewish Declaration of War on Nazi Germany
    The Economic Boycott of 1933
    (This last one is very relevant, it demonstrates that before Hitler ever came to power, the Zionists were already prepared to go to war with Germany, NOT the other way around, as we’ve always been led to believe.)
    Regards the issue of 911, there is not a shred of doubt in my mind, that the perpetrators of this event were JEWISH.
    Follow the money, every organization involved with the security/management/refurbishment/clean up/disposal/aircraft maintenance were all Jewish companies registered in Israel.
    Then of course we have the indisputable fact of the “dancing Israelis” who were caught red handed with cameras filing the event, which PROVED beyond a shadow of doubt, they KNEW the event was going to happen, and kept Stum (Quiet) instead of informing their ALLEGED Allie of what was about to be unleashed against them.
    If that is the behavior of an ALLIE nation, America is in deeper doo, doo, than they are even aware of.
    Oh, did I say that those very same “dancing Israelis ” were allowed to board a plane, (despite a lock down, similar to the Saudis) and allowed to leave the country free as a bird, and the U.S. Government avoided at every opportunity to even discuss the matter.
    If folks seriously believe that such behavior is normal, we are ALL, in deep shit.

    • And yet they were dumb (or arrogant) enough to go on TV (in Israel) and say they were there to “document” the event. So much for the superior (((Kahzar))) intellect we hear so much about.

    • David Cole seems to have lost his spine in his later years.

      Mary, this is one place I didn’t expect to see you go. May I offer another idea? The Holocaust has not aged well with the advance of technology. Cases in point include DNA analysis, which put paid to the soap-from-victims thing, and ground-penetrating sonar which dramatically reduced the number of known mass graves (that couldn’t be disturbed for confirmation/proof because feelings). The next question is of course the oldest question: qui bono?

      • Paul, I hope we live long enough to find out.

        The person who comes closest to answering, in my opinion, is John Coleman, in “The Committee of 300.”

        I want to say how great could be our surprise. In 1994 Anton Chaitkin — a reliable researcher — published “Treason in America, from Aaron Burr to Averill Harriman.” Boy, did he come up with some doozies as to who is running the show. Names you would never guess.

        Just as you would never guess that the “comedian” Bob Hope was the all-time king of pizzagate.

        It is just plain intellectually sloppy to say “The Jews did it.”

        And now let me say a word of comfort to peeps who are finding all this out for the first time: Don’t be embarrassed that you were mistaken. We were all mistaken. Mistakes r us. It’s a great game.

        Oops, I just noticed that Coleman and Chaitkin both published their books in 1994. And this is 2017. Hadn’t we better hop on the Express?

        P.S. My book, “Prosecution for Treason,” is a real reference book. It sells on Amazon for nine bucks. The average 18-year-old can get a college education in one weekend from it. Save on tuition fees!
        Does that 18-year-old want to learn science instead? Buy her a copy — free download actually — of my 2013 book “Consider the Lilies: A Review of 18 Cures for Cancer and Their Legal Status.” Is cancer a genocide? Yes. I calls ’em as I sees ’em. Is autism a genocide? How could it be anything else.
        Let’s hope it doesn’t take 100 years for that to sink in.

  6. We are in for some controversy here, and the ABC Faine brigade will open with a broadside.
    Over 50 million people were killed in WW11, or was it WW1?
    Can we agree on tens of millions and wholesale destruction?
    May we keep in mind:
    The bankers funded Hitler.
    Germany was ruined by WW1, the currency for one’s pay was delivered by a wheelbarrow.
    So Hitler burnt down the Reischtag and blamed a simple minded commie and extracted his head.
    Thus the Enabling act was introduced later to be reflected by the US Patriot act drafted before 911 and miscellaneous acts later such as the National Defence Authorisation Act ‘enabling’ the suspension of all citizen’s rights in the US……. permanent secret incarceration for eternity with no checks etc. I think we have something in OZ limited to two weeks.
    In 1933 Hitler did a deal with zionist interests to enable 60,000 Jews to go to Israel. Look up the ‘transfer agreement’, that my Jew friend does not want to discuss.
    Ok, look up what the corporates and bankers wanted in 1933. That was to get General Smedley Butler to take over Washington with his 50,000 troops and be a fascist President.
    Butler said ‘up yours’ and reported the plan to the President. The bankers said shut up or we will withdraw our money and the US goes down the plug hole. Thus the attempted act of war was sent under the carpit in Congress. But later, the President done in a Banker, Prescott Bush for some trading with the enemy caper.
    In 1933 General Smedley Butler penned a booklet; ‘ WAR IS A RACKETT’. Search it and hear a u tube recital of Butler’s words.
    An up date of the bankers/corporate war killers BS may be found at http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ ( about 40 minutes) see the index to the wrh site. ‘All wars are banker’s wars’.
    Well this is all of the cuff, anyone want to argue, go ahead.
    Now for a recent revision.
    Search: ‘Rabbi Yosef Tzvi ben Parat. Why Hitler Hated The Jews’.
    As I comprehend his point: they were/are communists and are using decent Jews (classed as serial victims and created by their masters) for their communist totalitarian globalist new world order agenda. As Rothschild declared, in effect; ‘If I control the country’s money I care not who runs the government/s’.
    As for 911, someone said to me and it was not Jonathon Faine, I suppose you believe the Jews did 911. My reply was simple; ‘is Dick Cheney a Jew’? No reply!
    Hey, I have not even mentioned what the Bolshevicks did to about 20 million Ukrainians. So let us start our revision with some real holocausts.
    Any one want to mention the genocide presently being undertaken against the Palestinians by the Kharsarians (Mongols) who have no genetic connection with the genuine semites, which term covers ‘arabs’ of many religions.

    • Ned, from the REAL truth-telling department I bring you part of a 1993 speech by the Secy Gen of the Atlantic Alliance (i.e., NATO):
      “Our aim must be to bring together the successor generations of future political leaders. We must foster among them a sense of common values, outlook and culture as well as the personal ties that make our vision of a Euro- Atlantic community a reality.”

      I’ll say!

      (Got that from the verry subtle website of Elias Davidsson –juscogens.org)

  7. if you really want to find out the jewish influence, you need to talk to Brendon O’Connell. He remains the only person in Australia to be jailed under that stupid vilification law. The work the jews put in to have put behind bars was absolutely incredible. They continue to make his like miserable via the WA police. He was jailed essentially because he accused Israel a murderous state. That’s true isn’t it? Ask any Palestinian

    • That’s wierd, Glenn. I did not know of it. Fredrick Toben’s imprisonment in SA was not for crime; it was contempt of court.

      The WA Commission on Law Reform issued a paper in 1992 which said, at 217:

      “In civil law, the general rule is that a group cannot maintain a civil action for defamation unless the group is so small that the defamatory statement can reasonably be taken to refer to each and every member of it, when those individuals may sue in their own right. Knupffer v London Express Newspapers Ltd [1944]”

      I realize that the Brendan O’Connell case was not a civil action but a prosecution for inciting racial hatred. What a joke, telling people they can’t hate. Everybody hates somebody. Trump hates Muslims. I hate Ruritanians. They make me sick.

  8. I see Dr. Tobin has already commented. And I thought I was so clever discovering the Holocaust De-Proramming site, which I believe he is instrumental in creating.


    If it’s not The Archduke story for WW1, 9/11, the Holohoax, the USS Liberty, The Titanic, :The “sneak attack” on Pearl Harbour, Saddam’s WMD’s, the Russians shot down MH-17, and the Piece de Resistance, the non-existence of VIP pedo network sin our halls of power, media, medical and educational institutions, corporations and military and intel agencies.

    Boy have we been had, big time.

    Revise EVERYTHING!!

    • Sweetie, I said they tried to sink it.

      But now that I have your attention, what do you think was the cause of the death of 34 Liberty sailors? Why was the ship attacked? Thousands of Gumshoe readers are at the edge of their seats waiting for your analysis.

      Also please give your name and preferably your background on this issue so we can have a serious discussion.

      • Hey Mary, I think Dan was referring to your recommendation at the end of your article where it says: “I recommend that we look into the sinking of the Liberty with the question “Who did it, and why?”” I am sure you meant to say “the attempted sinking” there.

        • Come on, Jason, I was recapping my above item, needed to be tight with words. Thanks for defending me. Why do you think “DanD” bothered to comment?


          There is a new book out that says the reason is that the PTB were on their way to nuking Egypt at that moment and the Liberty got in the way. Do you know LBJ was a coprophiliac? If so, why not nuke Egypt?

          And in the Reagan admin, according to Al Martin — who seems reasonable to me — Ollie North was planning to nuke America.

          Gotta watch out for these guys. They would let the shit fly.

      • Why does the “name” gets asked only when something strikes a nerve (usually it’s vanity or pride)?

        Sociobiology, I am sure, would explain it easy; not so the principles of urbanity and evenness.

        There should be more composure and uniformity of behavior, for comments that please and displease us, likewise.
        However displeasing, clearly malice-free comments shouldn’t elicit aggression.

        The “thousands can’t wait to hear your analysis” provocation comments itself.

        He “bothered to comment” for the same reason everybody else, including the authors of comments that please instead of displeasing, do: he wanted to say something, and he said it.

        Or maybe that comment is another misleading state op, and we’ll have a piece on it tomorrow?
        Thousands are waiting for such a piece, maybe!
        An harder bet may be the number of strangers who’ll be called “sweetie”, and angrily so.

    • Sorry, Berry. That was me being personal. I shouldda said The truth about WWI didn’t reach this address (Adelaide SA) until I happened to buy the Jim and Gerry book.

      Let me also take this opportunity to recommend Emile Dillon’s “Inside the Paris Paece Conference” published in 1921. As soon as I can I will scan it and put it on archive.org. You can do that, you know, for any book pre 1927 as they are now out of copyright. Yay!

  9. I have written about the Holohoax.

    Holy Holohoax. My Government Wouldn’t Lie To Me.


    I believe we need to go back to the JFK assassination before visiting 911.

    Video: Israel Killed President John Fitzgerald Kennedy


    Israel did do 911.

    Israel Did 911. All the Proof In The World


    Sorry I never saw your blog until today.

  10. The Jews BRAG about and SELF DOCUMENT THEIR “holocausting” others and then “PLACE A YOKE” on Gentiles for SUPPOSEDLY doing the exact same thing to them.
    FUNNY that everything they claim the nazis did is an EXACT COPY of their own book..
    Deuteronomy 7:16, 20:16 “And thou shalt consume all the peoples which the Lord thy God shall deliver unto thee; thine eye shall not pity them…thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth.”

    Numbers c.5 v.2-4
    Leviticus c.20 v.13 well, really the whole chapter
    Exodus c.32 v.27
    Numbers c.11 v.1-2
    Numbers c.16 all
    Numbers c.21 v.5-6
    Numbers v.26 v.10
    KILL anyone who engages in “DIVERSITY” or “INTEGRATION”
    Numbers v25 v.4-8
    Deuteronomy c.14 v.2
    SEXUALLY ENSLAVE any females “who have not KNOWN a man”
    a very brief selection, many more in THEIR book.
    Numbers c.21 v.03 Canaanites
    Numbers c.21 v.24 Amorites
    Numbers c.21 v.33-35 Bashan
    Numbers c.31 all Midianites
    Numbers c.32 v. more Amorites
    Deuteronomy c.2 v.34 People of Heshbon
    Deuteronomy c.3 v.6 really the whole chapter. threescore cities
    Joshua c.12 A list of victims of Israeli GENOCIDE
    Numbers c.21 v.25
    Numbers c.32 v.39
    Numbers c.33 v.53
    (just to name a FEW)
    Numbers c.33 v.31-34
    Deuteronomy c.7 v.2
    Deuteronomy c.12 v.28-30
    Deuteronomy c.20 v.11-16
    Deuteronomy c.2 v.2
    Deuteronomy c.7 v.1
    Jews SELF-anointed “The CHOSEN People of GOD”
    Nazis SELF-anointed “The CHOSEN People of GENETICS”.
    TODAY Israel states that it is creating “A PURE Jewish State”
    YESTERDAY the Nazis were creating “A PURE German State”
    And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword . . . (Joshua 6:21)
    For modern day reinforcement of these “rules” research/google “the KINGS TORAH”

  11. Hmmm

    A reoccurring theme here is that the Jews “didn’t do it” The fact remains that since WWII ALL Jews have benefited greatly in a very concrete way from the creation of the Holocaust myth. Benefits which continue to this day. Which in turn motives “Jews” in general to protect and perpetuate that myth. So generally speaking an indictment of the “Jews” as a group (not Judaism) isn’t as far off the mark as suggested here. But “jews” are no more responsible for the evils of the lasts 100 years anymore than “Christians” were responsible for the horrors of the Crusades. Or the “Romans” for their dirty deeds.

    It is the “zionists” that are responsible going back more than 100 years for the betrayal of America and the ongoing destruction of the Republic. However, the “zionists” who are predominately made up of jewish members, also followers drawn from just about every race, creed, color and religion. Zionism and those that follow that political ideology, are the people we should be focusing on, not “Jews” or “neocons” and absolutely not “Muslims”.

    • DDearborn, I take your point. In some ways, mainly because of the payment of reparations, a German Jewish refugee might have gained monetarily.

      The same is true of me. I grew up in the US. I believed my government’s treatment of the oppressed folks of South America was rotten (say the Guatemalan coup in 1954), but I gained, at least somewhat, from the importing of food at low prices. Coffee was ridiculously cheap. It was bought without the vaguest notion of “fair trade.”

      You say the advantage motivates “Jews” in general to protect and perpetuate that myth. I rather doubt it. We ALL believed the myth. A Jew living next door to me would have seen the same Hollywood movies about WWII as I saw. So, I don’t imagine “the myth” was upheld by the Jewish population. It would have been certain specific Jews orchestrating the whole thing.

      But my bigger question is: Who is orchestrating those orchestrators? Who – other than Jews — gained from the myth? I think I know who. Sure I could be wrong. (Paul, on this website always tells me I’m wrong.)

      Wait. I’ll call my bookie and see what the odds are today.

      • Hmmm

        Mary a significant percentage of the world’s population has never bought into the holocaust myth as it is presented today. Most people of my generation where not subjected to indoctrination like the young people of today. A carefully designed system of indoctrination which literally now starts in first grade and continues unabated through High School. In my day if the “holocaust” was covered at all, it was as a minor footnote, nothing more. And that topic was not introduced, except perhaps in passing, until High School.

        And in point of fact, the term “Holocaust” as it is generally accepted today, did not begin to come into wide spread use as part of the general lexicon for most people In America until the late 1960’s. Which is hardly surprising given that a very large part of the present day construct of the “Holocaust” was built upon publications and testimony that was not written until well after the war ended. And many of those publications and alleged first had accounts have subsequently been proven to be fraudulent. The most famous case of fraud being the now infamous Diary of Anne Frank. Which in a twist of Irony was proven a fraud during a trial against an individual who publicly claimed the Diary was a fake by the none of than the German Government. Despite the definitive and unimpeachable evidence which was presented in court and under oath by representatives of the German government that a very large percentage of the Diary was written in Ball point pen and thus could not have been written until well after the war (and thus not by Anne) this individual was still convicted.

        Again, I firmly believe that “Jews” suffered, and some cases horribly during WWII, as did many other groups. But the idea that even close to 6 Million died, let alone were gassed en mass, simply isn’t supported by the evidence and facts at hand. Which is obviously one of the reasons why Zionists/Jews have worked so hard to make the public examination and debate of the evidence and facts illegal.

        Zionists are behind the curtain pulling the strings. And the leadership of the zionist movement remains to this day Ashkenazi Jews. Every Single Prime Minister of Israel has been an Ashkenazi Jew. Which is rather strange when one stops to consider that their ancestors never set foot in the Middle East, let alone “ancient Israel”. So Mary I believe your implications that it is someone other than Jews is false. In fact, I believe you are intentionally introducing a false narrative here. With all due respect of course.

        • DDearborn, I’m not exactly introducing a false narrative, as I have no “narrative” to support my claim that there is a very high level of persons who run the whole thing. I believe I can deduce it from the quality and quantity of their work.

          hey are deep into everything including education, medicine, and the running of Royal Commissions. They guide all democratic elections. (In Oz it’s sooo easy to do. because instead of Primaries we have unabashed Pre-selection of candidates by the big Parties.)

          Bibi Netanyahu strikes me as an ass, and Ariel Sharon was a jerk. Neither could even aspire to do the things that I think the “World Government” does.

          I have read “Synagogue of Satan” and assume its facts are correct.

          I agree with you that the main Holocaust story came out around 1970. It seemed to me at the time that every weekly edition of the New York Tines Book Review gave us a new title on that subject – all of which I thought was accurate back then. Damn those writers and NYT editors for tricking us.

          The Anne Frank thing is really weird. Here is what I think any Jewish person should say today:
          “Hi, It seems the book was written by someone other than a 13 year old. Yet it is interesting fiction with plenty of real-life scenes, and feelings. We Jews are glad to have the truth of its authorship now revealed.
          “Every group has fiction stories that more or less give a picture of events. No guilt there. However if someone set up the Jews to take the fall for a hoax, then I am angry and would like to knock that person’s teeth out. Thank you very much.”

          DDearborn, a few months ago when I was attending the Amirah Droudis trial in Sydney I popped into the Holocaust museum. At the front gate I saw a sign “Special Exhibition: The Diary of Anne Frank.” I went Oh-oh.
          My very first thought was that the organizers know damn well that the story is Trouble and yet they are immersing their kids in it. (I believe Yeshiva students make bus trips to that museum.) That is really mean of them to do that — if the students then see on the Internet that Anne Frank did not write the diary, they will have to deal quietly with their anger and confusion, as it will be hard for them to do a “David Cole.”

          DDearborn, would you agree that it is the German Government that is the main fraudster when it comes to the Holocaust legend today? Are you arguing that Merkel takes marching orders from “Jews”? I don’t think so.

          • “Bibi Netanyahu strikes me as an ass, and Ariel Sharon was a jerk. Neither could even aspire to do the things that I think the “World Government” does.”

            I don’t think the Government of Israel is really that much a part of it all. I think their job is more to administer the rules of the hideout-with-sovereignty (Right-of-return doesn’t seem too choosy about who returns). The word Zion I think may carry more weight as a cross-boundary Global idea, now that Israel represents a single fixed location.

  12. Martin Bryant was right-handed, but when asked to demonstrate holding a firearm he held the butt to his left shoulder and sighted with his left eye.

    • Yes, I believe that is the correct thing. It is often said “he was left-handed” — no, he was just a leftie shooter. He was right handed.

      OMG, what’s with the past tense, Mary? He is still alive. Any readers in Adelaide on March 15 at 3pm, please come to the Burnside library where I will present a Moot Court Trial for Martin Type the word “Youtube” in front of this to see a trailer:


  13. Read UNDER THE SIGN OF THE SCORPION, by Juri Lina (3rd edition, 592 pages), which in a VERY WELL-WRITTEN manner, provides ALL THE DETAILS ONE NEEDS to figure out exactly which group is IN CHARGE!

    • Thank you. I have only glanced at tit so far. It says:
      “Juri Lina claims that the USSR was ruled by Jewish gangsters. Soviet “anti-Semitism” was the spin they put on their gang wars. Marxist ideology was a smokescreen. Josef Stalin was a Jew who spoke Yiddish and married Jewish women. He was diagnosed as a “paranoid hysteric” by a doctor he murdered for revealing this.

      “He had an inferiority complex due to being only five foot one inch tall and employed a stand-in for public appearances. He murdered his second wife in 1932 when she accused him of genocide. Like Lenin, another Jew (who died of syphilis) Stalin was also bisexual. (pp. 284-286). These are the freaks the Illuminati bankers put in power.”

  14. Everything has become so complicated so quickly . We all need to sit back and reflect on truth .
    There’s a book by Kevin Barret ” God exists , the rest is speculation ” . Below is one paragraph ;
    ” Jesus teaching that ‘ the kingdom of God is all around us ‘
    suggests that we go through life virtually blind , unable to see the riches and beauty surrounding us . Once we awaken to it , we enter this ‘ Kingdom of God ‘ by way of shedding our all – too – human egos and enjoying the sheer overwhelming beautiful abundance of existence with others , in communal fashion , while gaining psychic ( especially healing ) abilities .
    This , not the illusory vale of tears we previously inhabited , is the actual reality – as mystics from time immemorial , from all traditions , have affirmed ” .

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion