The Melbourne Town Hall Portico where press conferences are sometimes held. A press conference was being held at 1.15pm on Friday 20 January 2017, when Dimitrious Gargasoulas started doing donuts nearby in a stolen Holden
by Dee McLachlan
I bumped into a lawyer friend in the coffee shop this morning, and asked a simple question. “How do I get the police to answer a few simple questions on a crime that has been committed?” His answer was simple and blunt. “They don’t have to give you anything.”
It seems strange when the salaries of the police bureaucracy are paid by the tax payer, that they have no obligation to answer any hard questions put by said tax payer.
In other words it is a closed shop. “You get what we give you.”
So how else do you get to the bottom of what happened at an incident?
Media reporting? That will provide very little.
Take the Sydney siege for example. So many questions remain unanswered — because they were never asked. And the mainstream media put out only a narrow view of the event, and that view becomes the official narrative.
Or is it rather that the press are in on the narrative in the first instance?
That seems most definitely the case with 9-11. The MSM created the narrative from which the politicians, the commission, and the masses followed. It is the MSM that also then provided a platform to discredit any questioning of their narrative.
And the same goes for witnesses.
The MSM will only broadcast those witnesses that fit the official narrative.
Why have they not provided airtime to, say, Bobby McIlvaine — regarding the murder of his son in the North Tower?
Isn’t it normal to talk to the bereaved – and Bobby wants to talk. But media won’t interview him as he will destroy the official story. Just one 30-minute serious interview with McIlvaine by a high profile MSM staffer would put doubt in the minds of any believer.
And so, with the MSM controlling the narrative, the alternative voices start speculating.
Where does the truth lie?
“…It’s about the soap opera called television.”
He describes how some believe the whole incident was faked (a hoax); some believe the killings were real, but that Adam Lanza was a patsy; or that the federal government secretly contracted the killings in order to take guns away. Many think that many of those grieving parents were crisis actors.
Peekay claimed that many in the Melbourne car rampage were crisis actors .
John Rappaort’s Excellent View
There are many YouTube clips that analyse witnesses interviewed on television. Rappaport makes some important points.
“You can look for YouTube interview clips featuring “the people of Sandy Hook”: Robbie Parker, the Sotos family, Sally Cox, H Wayne Carver, Gene Rosen, Kaitlin Roig, etc.
“Their reactions, non-reactions, strange behavior, inexplicable attitudes are stunning.
“First of all, you have to realize that only certain people get on television.”
He goes on to classify the groups of people who did NOT get on television:
- Grief-stricken parents who were incoherent (which is what you would expect): not interviewed.
- Angry and outraged parents: not interviewed.
- Parents who demanded answers from a full investigation, who were not satisfied with the media-controlled story line: not interviewed.
- Then those parents who refused to be engaged in the media spectacle: refused to be interviewed.
You never see these people.
What you see are those few people that are okay with their tragedy being aired to millions.
As Rappaport says:
“We have interviewees who have never been on television before, but have watched thousands of television interviews. They have a strong tendency to “act like people are supposed to act” when they are put on camera.”
They are filling a role they believe a television-watching-society expects of them — and thus play their grief out accordingly. And it is these few interviews that are used by people to extrapolate what is happening.
As I have said before when commenting on interviews where people have been called crisis actors. They are such bad crisis actors, they must be real. They would never have cut mustard in the casting.
So, again, it is our job to look behind the mainstream media — and see what they are doing to distort the narrative.
As with this latest incident in Melbourne. The police are most likely not going to be forthcoming with details. So maybe we need to interrogate the media. It is about time, we started to investigate them.
As Rappaport says (about Sandy Hook),
“…whatever the true operation that was mounted and carried out there—the role of television is central.
“…They plug into a deep cynicism that underlies the robotic behavior and thought of millions of people… Television magnifies and exacerbates that disconnectedness.”
Most likely that is the real core of the problem. The media control the narrative. They are trying to control our reality. So is anything questioning that fake?
Here is my communication to the Victorian Police Commissioner:
“Sir, please arrange a time for me to interview (on camera) the three drivers of the three silver cars that followed Dimitrious Gargasoulas up Swanston Street.”
Photo credit: www.epicure.com.au/