(L) The North Tower exploding outwards, and (R) Kate Ellis MP
Editor’s Note: I publish below the open letter to Minister Ellis, and below that to Paul Barry (Media Watch) regarding their views on 9-11. Barrister Antcliffe, a member of Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, provides Kate Ms Ellis a small sample of evidence regarding September 11.
Ms. Kate Ellis. MP.
And all staff members.
Parliament House. Canberra. ACT.
Dear Ms Ellis, and staff members.
[cc: Media Watch, Michael Rivero, Dateline, 7.30 Report, Senator D Hinch, One Nation]
I refer to a message sent to you by Ms Dee McLachlan on 13th February relating to your comments recently on the ABC “Q and A” program.
It is reported that you claimed that: the official government conspiracy theory on the mass murders on 9-11 is correct and that alternative views are “fake.”
I do not have much time this morning but I will run the following comments up quickly.
I have been studying the 9/11 mass murders since late 2003 and I state that I have formed the opinion that the official 9/11 mass murder theory is fake. Over the years I have met with many experts and those knowledgeable about 911 and discussed the relevant material.
Such people include the following:
Lt Col Bob Bowman, (RIP) who at one time was head of President Reagan’s ‘star wars’ program. Bob says simply that the official version is ‘hogwash’ and that the US air force was stood down on 911, the “hijacked aircraft should have been intercepted within 10 minutes of discovery if the usual protocols for interception had not been changed in July 2011.”
Well, fancy that. In July 2001, the approval for interceptions was changed from the military to the executive. Think on that and what it meant and the consequence that followed. Oh, the protocols were put back after 9-11!
If you care to do your duty, you will find him listed at: http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/ under the military personnel section. Also look up all those professors who you think believe ‘fake’. (Theirs have not been updated since 2011)
Professor Steven Jones obtained some ‘dust’ from the towers and, Ms. Ellis, he decided to examine it. So he put it in a plastic bag, spread the bag out and ran a magnet over the top of the bag and low and behold; all the minute metal spheres were attracted to the underside of the plastic. Then he actually used his brain to satisfy his scientific curiosity and ultimately discovered that there was military grade thermite/ate in the debris as well. Molten steel spheres? You may ask, so what? Well, sorry to be trite but one does not obtain molten steel spheres without very high temperatures, being much higher than temperatures that can be achieved by office furniture and fuel from an aircraft. You will recall of course all that molten steel that took weeks to ‘put out’. (At this time spend 35 seconds listening to those who saw the molten steel at; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCdRA09pztM/ )
Really simple, just a matter of looking at the evidence See the paper:
Niels H Harrit. Just read the paper above.
Frank Legge. Frank is an Australian chemist from West Australia. I have not conversed with him for a few years, I do not think he was well. Anyway for Frank just read the paper above. He is very good at explaining science, especially in regard to the thermate/ite. No doubt Ms. Ellis you have prepared and baked a fruit pudding. Well, baking thermate is like that, a pudding (thermate one) with all the correct ingredients in proportion just does not appear in the rubble of the towers by accident.
Frank explained patiently in detail this concept with a colleague, who was once in the military. Guess who gave up…. …he would not concede anything but he had to give up. Science trumps silly conspiracy theories? Another simple matter to consider.
Richard Gage. Now Richard is the master on the failing structures on 9/11. Too long to deal with, as with this whole subject, but he, as an architect simply observed building number 7 collapsing in 6.5 seconds and wondered how could 47 stories of steel structured building could do that, unless ‘Mr Gravity’ was the evil culprit.
Well Ms Ellis, I will leave you to have a word with ‘Mr Gravity’ at http://www.ae911truth.org/ you should be able to apply due diligence to your duties that you are paid for.
The official government/msm conspiracy theory simply does not stand the test of a objective scientific examination of the evidence. Clearly 47 story building number 7 was blown up and the towers can reasonable be found to have suffered the same fate…………..BLOWN UP!
It is most disturbing that there appear to be so many representatives in our Australian and state parliaments, including you, who appear unable to comprehend a scientific examination of physical facts. Of course such deficiencies appear amongst the mass media people as a matter of course.
Perhaps you might ask your close friend as to why that is so and why they are so ‘fake’ and covering for mass murderers. Of course we have the msm failures to inform of the pre-911 plan to go invade and kill in 7 countries, in the interview by General Wesley Clark with Amy Goodman, linked in the letter below to Paul Barry. As a consequence, our politicians have mostly been in favour of killing a million or more in the Middle East.
Such persons, deficient in such abilities should not even be permitted to serve on a criminal jury, as they demonstrate and inability or lack of will or diligence to examine scientific evidence that may be brought before them as evidence.
It is also most disturbing that such deficiencies must, as a matter of course, reflect on all aspects of the decision making by government on behalf of their electorates.
Australia is in for sad times if our representatives do not understand science, in this case the role of ‘Mr.Gravity’ and that; science trumps silly tin foil hatter 911 conspiracy theories of the government style every time. Have a word to Galileo or Copernicus on that.
I include a message sent to another “fake’ outfit that is set out below. I commend the links for your further edification on identifying ‘fake’.
Mr Paul Barry.
All ABC staff at ‘Media Watch’ and wherever else.
Australian Broadcasting Commission. Sydney.
[cc: Mike Rivero, Kevin Braken, Channel 10 News, Sydney Morning Herald, Justinian]
Dear Mr Barry and all ABC staff,
I am not going to waste much time on the ABC, as you have been informed by me consistently on the ‘fakeness’ of our MSM, ABC and SBS.
I note however that Mr Barry and the ABC receive a citation as a ‘senior class of fakes’ at the following genuine news site in the article linked hereunder. The comments may be noted and hopefully the thinking Australian public will eventually realise that the ABC is deceitful, a waste of space (billion dollar a year public hole) and of our money.
Just one little hint as to what extent the ABC is fake.
Just listen for 2 minutes to ex military head of NATO; General Wesley Clark in his interview with Amy Goodman in March 2007, linked hereunder.
The ABC staff; just think about the fact that the ABC has not fully exposed the truth, if at all; behind the killing of a million plus in the Middle East and the contribution the ABC has played in the killing and destruction by denying the Australian people the truth behind the pre-911 planned mass murders in the Middle East.
The 9/11 murders also being a government lie to suck in unscientific minded/denialist conspiracy theorists and aiders and abettors of the official government conspiracy theory, to cover up for the abominable crime committed by the real mass murderers.
A further report here.
For a quick 4 minute summary of the ABC’s 911 conspiracy theory have a look at;
As an aside, sorry ABC, but you really have to improve the ABC’s prophetic talents. The ABC’s cousin in the United Kingdom, the BBC, have a crystal ball and can forecast buildings, like 47-storey number 7, collapsing on 9/11 about ten minutes before it is blown up. See BBC’s Jane Stanley’s report on BBC at;
Now for another example of our fake ABC; Jonathon Faine with Kevin Bracken in October 2010.
As for another famous fake ABC episode, listen to the ABC’s Jonathon Faine contradict Malcolm Fraser in regard to the killing of about 34 USS Liberty crewmen in 1967 with a ‘false flag’ attack.
Mr Fraser was quite emphatic, the attack by Israel on the USS Liberty was DELIBERATE.
Does the ABC agree with Mr Faine’s assertion: ‘…from recollection it was a mistaken missile attack’? That implies a single missile attack….yea right! Have a look at photographs of the damage to the USS Liberty as it ‘limped’ to safety.
I corresponded with a Mr Joe Meadors who was on the USS Liberty at the time and witnessed the TWO HOURS of battle with Israel’s, fighter planes, torpedo boats strafing the USS Liberty and helicopter troop carriers trying to take over the USS Liberty. Joe’s correspondence was sent to the ABC and to Mr Faine. There was not even an apology or report on the eyewitness account by Mr Meadors aired by or referred to by the ABC.
Now how fake can the ABC slump to?
By the way, Mr Meadors explained that the crew’s account of the killings was not permitted to be placed before the inquiry into the killings!!!! So the fake reports alleging that there was a proper inquiry are just another ‘fake’ story to cover up an act of war.
The relevant interview by Dee McLachlan with Mr Fraser shown at Gumshoe News is linked below.
How about it, ABC ‘fake’, try being genuine? After all, you are all on the tax payer’s teat and the Australian public may surely expect to be informed of some facts that are not fake and we might recover some of our billion dollars with some credit ……….. at least for some ABC credibility.
Photo credit: Kate Ellis Twitter