Police on the Champs Élysées, Paris
by Dee McLachlan
Yet another (terrorist) attack in France, and the French are becoming exasperated.
The “fight against terrorism” has now become a major factor in the forthcoming French election, and an ABC article today claims “Vote for president could reshape Western world.” The people want solutions to radicalization, and the extended state of emergency.
Why has France been the focus of terrorist attacks over recent years? Mainstream media are explaining that Islamic State gave out a worldwide message to its followers in September 2014, singling out France.
ISIS (supposedly) said:
“…kill a disbelieving American or European — especially the spiteful and filthy French…”
A few months later, ISIS released a video aimed at recruiting French Muslims — calling on jihadists to execute attacks in France.
But hang on, I thought IS was being funded and controlled by Western interests.
Attacks in France
I began to take notice of the attacks in France after the Charlie Hebdo incident (January 2015). It was surely a false flag. The mass shooting at the satirical magazine was allegedly carried out by two hooded gunman — allegedly Saïd and Chérif Kouachi, brothers from Algeria.
They miraculously evaded police in Paris, but then 22 hours later, and — now having discarded their masks – they entered a service station to steal water and petrol with a rocket launcher (I described it as maybe a prop).
Here is Kouachi, openly shopping, wearing his “bazooka” on his hip. Below, some rocket launchers
It made no sense. (My article on the two brothers.)
Even more telling (in my opinion) is the fact that Helric Fredou, the Police Commissioner who was preparing a report on the Charlie Hebdo shooting, was found dead with a bullet in the head just hours later. The official story claims he committed suicide.
Many more attacks followed:
February 2015 – Three military men, guarding a Jewish community center in Nice, are attacked by Moussa Coulibaly.
June 2015 – The Saint-Quentin-Fallavier attack involved an Islamist delivery driver decapitating a man.
August 2015 – An attempted mass shooting occurred on a train traveling from Amsterdam to Paris — injuring four people.
November 2015 – The deadliest terrorist attack in French history. ISIS claimed responsibility for killing of 90 persons during a siege during an Eagles of Death Metal concert inside the Bataclan.
2016 – Several attacks:
— A man rammed his car twice into four soldiers protecting a mosque;
— jihadist wearing a fake explosive belt attacked police officers;
— a police officer and his wife were stabbed to death in Magnanville;
— then a 19 ton truck, driven by Mohamed Lahouaiej-Bouhlel, drove into crowds celebrating Bastille Day in Nice;
— two terrorists attacked a Normandy church during a mass, killing an 86-year-old priest; and many more.
2017 – more terror attacks, then a soldier opened fire on a man who attempted to enter the Louvre museum with a machete. And now — “Policeman shot dead, two others wounded by gunman on Champs Elysees.”
This was all “predicted” — or prescribed — back in 1969.
Two Insights From Dr Day
Three tapes on the “New World System” were recorded in 1988. They were Dr. Lawrence Dunegan’s recollections of a lecture he attended on March 20, 1969 at a meeting of the Pittsburgh Pediatric Society. The speaker was Richard Day, MD, and this is what was said about…
“…Terrorism would be used widely in Europe and in other parts of the world. Terrorism at that time was thought would not be necessary in the United States. It could become necessary in the United States if the United States did not move rapidly enough into accepting the system. But at least in the foreseeable future it was not planned. And very benignly on their part.
“Maybe terrorism would not be required here [the US], but the implication being that it would be indeed used if it was necessary. Along with this came a bit of a scolding that Americans had had it too good anyway and just a little bit of terrorism would help convince Americans that the world is indeed a dangerous place, or can be if we don’t relinquish control to the proper authorities.”
It is extraordinary that Dr Day was claiming that the “system” would use terrorism to convince people that the world is a dangerous place, and thus persuading populations to relinquish control“.
Control to what, who?
Dr Day then outlined the ultimate form of control in his lecture. It must have sounded like pure science fiction to his audience back then in 1969 (before faxes or mobile phones). Dr Dunegan recalled this on…
(2) Implanted IDs
“…It was already planned that later on some sort of device would be developed to be implanted under the skin that would be coded specifically to identify the individual… and that this would have to be material on which information could be recorded and retrieved by some sort of scanner while it was not rejected by the body. Silicon was mentioned.
“There was some mention, also, of implants that would lend themselves to surveillance by providing radio signals. This could be under the skin or a dental implant, put in like a filling so that either fugitives or possibly other citizens could be identified by a certain frequency from his personal transmitter and could be located at any time or any place by any authority who wanted to find him.”
Will constant terror attacks slowly wear down a population into believing that personal microchips might be the answer to their safety?
This is possible in a compliant culture.
A European company has offered its employees this “opportunity”. At NewFusion, a Belgian tech firm, employees can opt in and get physical chips surgically implanted into their flesh (their hands) to access their building and computers.
So I wonder…
Are The French Being Targeted with Terror?
I’d say it would be hard to persuade the French to accept human microchips.
The French are known to be independent, idealistic and free thinking.
They are also suspicious of authority. It is interesting that a book on the “no plane crashed on the Pentagon on 9-11 theory” was successful in France within a short time after the event, selling more than a 100,000 copies.
And one more thing — they have reverence toward the human body.
So, regarding human micro-chipping — I’d say if you could persuade the French, you could persuade every other culture.
Maybe “they” are targeting France, and trying to break the French into compliance. If France legislates for compulsory electronic radio frequency identity (RFID) human microchips in the future — the rest of the Western world will be a push over, and would follow suit.