Home Uncategorized Trains, Planes, and Automobiles — After London Bridge, What’s Next?

Trains, Planes, and Automobiles — After London Bridge, What’s Next?


by Dee McLachlan

I was writing an article yesterday entitled “Trains, Planes and Automobiles” — What is Next?  

It was going to reflect on the past “Shock and Awe” media campaigns that continually “terrorize” us.

Well, I woke up this morning to see the unfolding incident in London. A summary of what has been reported so far:

  • Police declare Saturday night were “terrorist incidents’’.
  • Incidents on London Bridge and at Borough Market.
  • Multiple casualties — nine dead, and at least 20 people to six hospitals.
  • A white van ploughed into pedestrians on London Bridge pavement at about 10.08 pm.
  • Witnesses say 3 men climbed out and started stabbing people with large knives.
  • Men ran down road — multiple stabbings in Borough Market.
  • Pictures show a man on the ground in the market — with possible canisters strapped to his body.
  • Police responded to the attacks with gunfire.
  • Reports of controlled detonations.
  • People kept in bars — in lock-down.
  • Police looking for three assailants — then confirm that three suspect have been shot.
  • The suicide looking vest on [dead?] assailant was fake.
  • Assailants shot within 8 minutes of call out.

The mainstream media reporting revealed the chaos that unfolded. 

These are some observations from watching MSM news this morning:

  • Streets filled with police — both in yellow jackets and special ops.
  • Large groups of police moving/marching briskly up and down the streets.
  • The streets pulsating with the flashing lights from many emergency vehicles.
  • People are frog marched from venues with the hands on their heads.
  • People running aimlessly as police shout “get back, get back”.
  • Videos of frightened people told to “get down, down” in a restaurant. Then shortly after “there are armed police outside, so there is nothing to worry about.”
  • Confrontations and confusions as people are pushed back. In one altercation between police and Londoners, police are shouting “go home” — but it seems the police barrier is blocking those very people from getting to their homes.
  • Witnesses report that police arrived and were aiming guns at them.
  • People were in tears.

Interestingly Senator Sam Dastyari was at the market. He said this to the ABC:

“…having a quiet meal [in a restaurant in Borough]. We heard screaming. You could obviously tell there was an incident and someone starts running past, obviously covered in blood, kind of down the street,”

Senator Eric Abetz was interviewed on television. He says that we need to get to the root cause of this evil. Maybe he’s forgotten that we waged war on various countries resulting in the death of millions.

As Dr Day said back in his ‘Everything Is In Place And Nobody Can Stop Us Now’  lecture, in 1969:

“Terrorism would be used widely in Europe and in other parts of the world. At that time it was thought terrorism would not be necessary in the United States. It could become necessary in the United States if the United States did not move rapidly enough into accepting the system. Along with this came a bit of a scolding that Americans had had it too good anyway and just a little bit of terrorism would help convince Americans that the world is indeed a dangerous place, or can be if we don’t relinquish control to the proper authorities.” [9-11 convinced Americans to relinquish control.]

I look forward to the comments.



  1. The assailants were allegedly killed within 8 minutes.
    When I switched on the news — possibly 90 minutes after it first began, it appeared on live TV that the attack was still happening.

  2. Will someone please send Dr. Day’s full exposure to poor Sam and Eric so they can understand what is happening.
    Then they might awaken their idiot colleagues. Fat chance! They all ignore me…….. And gumshoe.

  3. The police seem to have someone in custody… then they SCREAM at everyone to “get back”. But really scream. Quite extraordinary.

  4. What is meant by “security services have carried out a number of controlled explosives in the area of the attacks”? Is this to frighten the public even more?

    Assailants were killed within 8 minutes. Wow! Try to get the local police to respond to a serious crime within 30 minutes or an hour. Mind you they would not have been pre-warned.

  5. ‘the arrival of terrorism on Australian shores’ can be seen here https://youtu.be/cE-Hquy_EhQ?t=1m20s
    with a 2009 look back at 1978 Hilton Bombing. The joke is that the government paid out the wrongfully accused as a foreign sect was blamed on the bombing – yet this 2009 7:30 Report retells the original lie. I guess people didn’t know about Muslim extremism back then so they picked an Indian religious sect! (Just pointing out that Dr. Day’s ‘terrorism’ had some early roots in Australian television media).

  6. Would it be OK if I cross-posted this article to WriterBeat.com? I’ll be sure to give you complete credit as the author. There is no fee, I’m simply trying to add more content diversity for our community and I liked what you wrote. If “OK” please let me know via email.


    • In rememberance of the approaching 8th June 1967.
      The Israelis have been on to this for years, paying people to be trolls for Israel.
      Simple reason being to hide relevant matters of truth under the skirts of cowardice.
      As an example:
      For new readers our ‘Nemisis’ passed well and truly through in comments here at a recent gumshoe news article on the USS Liberty murders in 1967.
      For Fake: Faines. Jewish News, Sydney Institute, the ABC etc.; your; cowardice, serial lies and deceit do not help the Israel cause and that of its people, in fact the lies make Israel a serious swamp on the world stage never to be trusted.

    • There’s no such thing as unbiased information.The benefit of the internet is that opposing claims can be readily weighed up; genuine conviction about anything can never be swayed.

      Giving any sort of energy to anything you don’t agree with is counterproductive.

  7. did ISIS claim responsibility yet? what number do they ring to do so anyway, is there a particular number that must be rung, or can they just ring a newspaper perhaps, then how does anyone know it is really a representative from ISIS on the other end? do they have to pass some sort of identity check? name, phone number, address, DOB..

    doesnt really matter who does it, or claims to have done it, or who is accussed of doing it.. the result is always the same..


    i wonder if she thinks it would be a good idea to ban all cars on the road to stop pedestrian deaths maybe..

    i guess fridge magnets saying be alert, but of course, not alarmed, just dont cut the mustard any more.

    they never let an opportunity pass by .. I guess if they dont get what they want this time round, theres always another chance when tomorrows bombs go off.

    I think i heard that the memorial concert for manchester raised millions.. who gets that money? who divides the cash up anyway? is it the government.. concert organisers.. a committee? profit off of misery, thats a good business to get into I think, I doubt business will dry up any time soon, will any money be shared with recent victims families in the most recent attacks? or with maybe syrian civillian victims of the latest western terrorism attacks? who decides who is to make money out of terror, ( i think boston bomb victims made some substantial cash too ) and whos death is not even worth mentioning their name in the papers, they are simply, one of hundreds..

    • I think Mossad agent Rita Katz and her organization known as “Site” have to “find” a vague Internet claim somewhere, then our totally not-controlled media slips into hyper-drive repeating it as gospel truth without any fact checking (which always gets in the way of a good story).

      • thanks Paul, seems almost as if on cue.. we have a terrorist incident in melbourne seemingly not long after i posted my comment…

        apparently he rang channel 7 to get the word out. I wonder if he had to look up the number or if he already had it in his phone as the go to media outlet for this sort of thing. I guess it is “Site” that the ABC was referring to when they say ISIS has then published something claiming responsibility for it on their propaganda outlet.

        I must say Joe Obrien did a good job of keeping a straight face when he said propaganda outlet.

  8. I have just learnt that an ex-military man who lives near London Bridge, but does not have visual contact with the area of the bridge, says that his window was open and he heard automatic gunfire prior to any emergency vehicles coming to the area.

    Why has this automatic gunfire, not been mentioned in any media reports previously, unless I have missed something?

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion