Home NWO Fire, Fury and a Potential False Flag on North Korea?

Fire, Fury and a Potential False Flag on North Korea?

15

by Dee McLachlan

Many “good” wars start with a false flag — so one must be wary of a possible conflict with North Korea.

As the story goes, Iraq deserved a “shock and awe” campaign because Saddam Hussein harboured Weapons of Mass Destruction.  All the intelligence agencies knew that Iraq had nothing to do with the 9-11 FALSE FLAG attack on New York in 2001, as it had long been in the planning to destroy many countries in the Middle East. The bogus WMD claim was cooked up to destroy Iraq.

Now, it is seems it is Kim Jong Un’s turn. I thought Julius Skoolafish’s comment on Mary’s article insightful:

“[A nuclear attack on Guam] would certainly kill two birds with one stone IF there WAS a ‘nuclear event’ at Guam.

“1. They could blame it on the DPRK (‘North Korea’) and justify its destruction and genocide. 2. They would not have to explain the ongoing and future aftermath of the Fukushima meltdown crisis … So simple – how clever!”

The Weapons Business

I had often thought that maybe the attack on Iraq was just a “Weapons Transaction.” By bombing Iraq, the military Industrial Complex got use (and get rid of) stockpiles of old weapons. I mean, what else would you do with building stockpiles of weapons? If there is no conflict, they just sit there — forcing government to reconsider new orders — and the industry stagnates.

The Military Industrial Complex is reliant on replenishment — use old stuff, so they can invent new and improved ways to destroy things and people.  So when a government is constantly in conflict, it’s pay day every day.

This is what was written PRI (Public Radio International), April 2016, in an article entitled, “We’re expending munitions faster than we can replenish them”:

“Secretary of Defense Ash Carter has asked Congress to include funding for 45,000 smart bombs in the Defense Department’s 2017 budget…. “…2 1/2 years of fighting ISIS and continued bombing in Afghanistan have exceeded weapons-use projections.” [Roman Schweizer, aerospace and defense policy analyst]

“Operation Inherent Resolve, the US-led military intervention against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant flies bombing missions in Syria and Iraq… [and] strikes ISIS targets with laser- and GPS-guided bombs, Joint Direct Attack Munition bombs, Joint Standoff Weapons, and air-to-ground missiles, such as the Hellfire… pricetags on these munitions range from around $25,000 to close to $400,000.

“‘In the early days of the [Syria] campaign the Navy fired a bunch of Tomahawk cruise missiles,’ notes Schweizer,  ‘and those are in the $1 million cost range…’

What an unbelievable business model.

Selling the Next Conflict

This is what the North Korea Times wrote on Friday (11/8/17):

Following US President Donald Trump’s warning to North Korea that continued threats against the United States would be met with “fire and fury like the world has never seen,” he received a response from the Kim Jong Un-led regime… [that] the North is “seriously examining the plan for an enveloping strike at Guam through simultaneous fire of four Hwasong-12 intermediate-range strategic ballistic rockets in order to interdict the enemy forces on major military bases on Guam and to signal a crucial warning to the U.S.”

The statement cited General Kim Rak Gyom (North Korea’s Strategic Rocket Forces head) saying that the plan would be finished by mid-August for presentation to Kim Jong Un for approval.

…The level of detail with which North Korea described the proposed strike has left many experts worried… The nuclear nation also took care to specify that the end point of the missiles is not Guam itself, but the waters off its eastern coast – which is 18 to 25 miles off.

…Secretary of State Rex Tillerson has offered that North Korea does not pose an imminent threat to the US and that Americans “should sleep well at night.”

Kim Jung Un, and Donald Trump

So what is all this argy-bargy about?

Mary claims Kim Jung Un is a cabal puppet, and so is this a proxy war being played out between two super powers — China and the US?

I am trying to work out what would the purpose be to create a war around the destruction of North Korea. Who would gain?

History Tells Us 

In 1898, the battleship USS Maine was sent to Havana,Cuba, to protect U.S. interests during a Cuban revolt against Spain. On February 14, the vessel exploded and sank. Many Americans blamed Spain, and the incident helped trigger the Spanish-American War. The payoff of that war for the US was great — It gained control of Cuba, Guam, Hawaii and the Philippines.

In 1933, Germany’s parliament building, the Reichstag, went up in flames. The police found a Dutch boy inside and somehow that proved that the Communists did it. Soon there follow a decree limiting all civil rights of the people (thanks to the communist threat). I don’t claim that this started a war, just that it secured the needed legislation for Hitler to gain new powers.

The Lavon Affair: In 1954 Israel did not like the affection America’s president Eisenhower was exhibiting toward Egypt. It then sent Israeli agents into Egypt, dressed up as Egyptians, to do violence to American interests. Unlike Israel’s guilt for sinking the USS Liberty in 1967, which is always denied, in this case all is admitted.  That’s because the heroes of the Lavon affair, the agents who dressed up as Egyptians, demanded medals!

Talking about Warheads

Do you remember the reports about the missing warhead in North Carolina? On September 5, 2013 Infowars wrote:

“Senator Lindsay Graham has warned South Carolinians about the threat of a ‘terrorist nuclear attack’ on the same day our exclusive high level military intel revealed to us that nuclear warheads were being shipped to South Carolina from a major Texas airforce base under an ‘off the record’ black ops transfer.

“[a CBS report details] Graham’s warning that a lack of military action in Syria could result in a nuclear ‘bombing’ in Charleston, South Carolina — the very destination of the black ops nuclear transfer.

Many alternative reports claimed that top military personnel resigned, as the nuclear device was to be used in a false flag. Reports allege that it was then detonated in the ocean 600 miles from Charleston on October 8 (2013), causing a 4.5 magnitude earthquake measurement.

I see the North Korea US rhetoric as a classic example of laying the ground for a potential false flag. Even in Australia, the media has hyped up that Australia could be a target. What!

Why in the world would Kim Jung Un fire a missile all the way “down under”? For what purpose? It feels like Foreign Minister Julie Bishop is preparing us for something. And that she in turn has been “prepared.” What script is the media reading from?

False Flag and a New World Order?

Could there be plans for a false flag being laid out? This one would be very hard to prove. It might be hard for Trump to decifer what is real and what is fake.

A simple detonation of a warhead near Guam could set the fireworks in that region ablaze.

I am making a tentative case (inspired by Julius Skoolafish’s comments), that any explosion going off could be easily scripted as being from the DPRK (‘North Korea’). A war there would disguise the Fukushima radiation, use up more munitions, and be a used as a proxy war between two super powers. It may even be a way to undermine Trump. And as no one in the West cares for North Korea or the North Koreans — it would be the perfect patsy state. Actually, no one really cares for Guam.

Hot heads Trump and Kim Jong Un would be the perfect puppets as actors in the staged (false flag) theater. And the audience would be none the wiser.

Thus, could the use of nuclear weapons on a country like North Korea be a trigger for the UN or “global government” to step in and say “enough is enough.” There needs to be one world governing body to avoid all this –and as Bush senior once famously said, we need “A New World Order.”

The stage is set for a classic false flag. Oh boy!

 

SHARE

15 COMMENTS

    • Canberra is about to spend $120 million dollars on a postal vote re: same sex marriage. I was talking to Ned, and he suggests that they add an additional question:
      Should Australia follow the US into a conflict with North Korea? (and thus possibly with China)

    • Mal, you say you hope I am not right. This article on NK is written by Her Bossness, not by me. I don’t have much of a theory about North Korea. Recall Dee wrote an article recently at Gumshoe saying the real “threat” [to the cabal] may be a possible reunification of the 2 Koreas, like the reunification of the two Germany’s in 1989.

      I think we should have holidays to celebrate good things like that instead of playing dirges. Yay!

  1. One may add the lies concerning the Gulf
    of Tonkin incident to falsely cause the Vietnam war.
    About 550 of my piers killed, 56,000 Americans and who cares about how many Vietnamese.
    Add the wounded and suicides.
    Yep, nothing beats false flag murders and lies to fool
    stupid people and turn them into ‘killers’ at the behest of our lying hypocritical criminal political representatives.

  2. What a history lesson in that video? How much more evil can be unveiled, about the Cabal that we tolerate. This is the kind of thing that is awaiting other parts of the World at this present time.

    Until countries around the World bring about the break up of the banks, into investment banking and retail banking this evil will continue. If the banks are broken up the huge profits that go to the Cabal will not be there to finance the buying of politicians and public servants who implement these evil schemes and plan war, on behalf of the Cabal.

  3. I quote Dr Day:

    “If these weapons fall into the wrong hands”? Maybe just terrorists. Anyhow, the new system would be brought in, if not by peaceful co-operation with everybody willingly yielding national sovereignty and then by bringing the nation to the brink of nuclear war. Everybody would be so fearful as hysteria is created by the possibility of nuclear war that there would be a strong public outcry to negotiate a public peace and people would willingly give up national sovereignty in order to achieve peace, and thereby this would bring in the ‘New International Political System.’ This was stated and a very impressive thing to hear then, “If there were too many people in the right places who resisted this, there might be a need to use one or two or possibly more nuclear weapons.” As it was put this would be possibly needed to convince people that, “We mean business.” That was followed by the statement that, “By the time one or two of those went off then everybody, even the most reluctant, would yield.” He said something about, “This negotiated peace would be very convincing”, as in a framework or in a context that the whole thing was rehearsed but nobody would know it.

    • For my voters: The above lengthy quote is from a transcript of a radio show in 1988. A physician, Lawrence Dunegan, MD, went on Randy Engels Christian radio show to get off his chest what had been bothering him since 1969.

      In 1969 he had heard an after-dinner speech by Richard Day, MD, in which Day foretold many thing which subsequently came to pass.

      The full speech can be found in a book co-written by myself and Dee McLachlan entitled “Truth in Journalism.” You can become the owner of that book by spending ten bucks at Amazon or by exercising a finger muscle to download the PDF here on this page of Gumshoe. or on the Books page of my campaign website http://www.MaxwellForSenate.com. Thanks.

    • And Dr Day addressed those words in 1969 to fellow doctors whom now treat our children.
      Since then our evil politicians and main stream traitors have progressed their agenda causing untold death and misery upon our planet and upon our children.
      Is there not one politician in Canberra or a single msm journalist who has a heart to expose this evil? (Even for the sake of their children and gc.. they may as well eat their gran children)

  4. THE HYMNBOOK SITUATION AS AT SATURDAY, 12TH:

    Aides later described the president’s remarks on North Korea as “unplanned and spontaneous.” Some officials and experts who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity suggested Trump’s impromptu escalation of rhetoric toward North Korea was unhelpful and could hamper diplomatic efforts.

    Secretary of State Rex Tillerson explained the president’s comments by saying Trump was speaking in language the North Korean regime “would understand” since diplomatic efforts haven’t been successful thus far. But Tillerson also seemed to temper Trump’s fiery remarks when he said the American people “should sleep well at night” without fear of a potential military conflict. On Wednesday, State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert further said there was no contradiction between Tillerson’s comments and Trump’s.

    ​”​We are all singing from the same hym​nbook​,” Nauert said.​

  5. So long as an alcoholic continues to blame the bottle for his problem…………………
    So long as Australia’s inhabitants fail to acknowledge that the entire construct of the Country is, and always has been, geared to serve the needs of a waning empire………

  6. The real threat to Guam?

    In March 2010, (the then Rep) Hank Johnson (D-Ga) made this comment about the U.S. territory of Guam during a House Armed Services Committee. In a discussion regarding a planned military build up on the Pacific island, Johnson expressed some concerns about the plans to Adm. Robert Willard, head of the U.S. Pacific fleet.

    “My fear is that the whole island [Guam] will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize,” Johnson said.

    Willard paused and replied, “We don’t anticipate that.” [Adm. Willard even kept a straight face – almost]

    * https://youtu.be/v7XXVLKWd3Q

    It deserved this …
    * https://youtu.be/oAEqXubT21I

    For the love of Mary (sic), who vets and elects these ‘legislators’ !! ??

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion