Home Australia “It’s Time The Institution of The Law Face Reality”

“It’s Time The Institution of The Law Face Reality”

43
(L) Senator Bill Heffernan and (R) Dr William Russell Pridgeon

by Dee McLachlan

The title refers to Senator Bill Heffernan’s 2015 speech into the Wood Royal Commission, where he said “It’s time the Institution of the Law face reality.”

A Reality Check

I have known for a long time, as others have, that the family and children’s court do NOT deal with allegations of child sexual abuse and regularly dispense with the matter as one would sanitary products — that is wrap it up tightly, and bin it. By trashing the facts; i.e., the allegations of children about persons harming, raping, or torturing them, in such a manner, the court (and their lackeys) then switch focus to accuse and prosecute the protective parent (or any other protector). The outcome is often a LIFE SENTENCE — a life sentence of separation and social deprivation.

And by the way, this is not a conspiracy theory … it is FACT.

And what happens to the children? For the most part, the family court orders the children to return and live with their abusers, and the children’s or youth court often places the child in government care until 18 years of age. This is the brutal reality in Australia.

I have said this before, ignoring and/or concealing child sexual abuse is truly the most abhorrent act in a supposedly civilized society, and Australia has mastered this. My 2018 Gumshoe survey plus my communication with South Australia Police (and their Internal Investigation Service) and other government oversight bodies prove beyond any doubt that the protocol is to DISCARD (and/or conceal) matters of child sexual abuse (unless it is impossible to do so).

Patrick O’Dea

So I have been watching for some years to see this culture of secrecy and non-protection of children emerge in the now two connected trials of DC and GA and Pridgeon and O’Dea. 

What I see unfolding is a classic case of injustice to the children … and their protectors. And these protectors are being charged with ‘Defeating the course of justice’.

But this case was infected from the get-go.

The 2018 orchestrated arrests of these two men was scheduled on a Wednesday in Grafton immediately prior to the supreme court doing a jury-based trial where Dr Pridgeon was to defend defamation allegations brought by a father. The child (not related to these trials) was going to testify before a jury about the truth of his experiences. It would have been shocking and would have changed the Australian landscape. But the Operation Noetic police arrests were timed perfectly with the police even referring to the defamation trial. They knowingly spoke to the media sub judice.

(I’ll detail this and the media in another article)

Public Confidence

I return to Senator Heffernan’s 2015 28-naming speech where he said, “Family Court judges demonstrate regularly they cannot deal with allegations of child abuse.” To continue with his exposé of the Wood Commission (see video below), he said:

“The Wood Royal Commission, as you know Mr Attorney [George Brandis] was about to explore — and it’s in the Hansard so it’s no great secret — who the legal fraternity people were that used to attend Costellos, the boy brothel club… in Kings Cross. And I’ve got the list here, and a lot of them are still practicing.  But the judge of the day, the Commission, decided it was a no-go zone … ‘We’ll rise for morning tea’ and they never went back to it. … [the Commissioner] said, ‘We’ve decided not to revisit that issue because the public would lose confidence in our judiciary’…”

There is a culture of denial and secrecy “because the public would lose confidence in our judiciary.”

No-go Zone

When I attended the two pre-trial hearings earlier this year in Brisbane, Judge Clare made it clear that this was not a trial about the alleged concealment of child sexual abuse by a police officer, nor was it about child sexual abuse. When I was in the gallery she said, (or words to this effect)…

“whether the children were abused or not is not relevant”.

It was about whether the defendants, Pridgeon and O’Dea, had conspired to defeat the course of justice. They believed their actions were protecting children from further sexual abuse. You see, Dr Pridgeon, O’Dea and GA had entered the no-go zone — exposing child abuse. And when Grandmother GA got a solicitor to represent her, that solicitor was “canceled”  because she also questioned the no-go zone. Let me explain:

I refer to a February 2, 2021 report in NEWS.COM.AU.

“Magistrate Anthony Gett struck out separate no-case submissions made by Dr Pridgeon and two other co-accused. Tuesday’s hearing took a sharp turn after one of the lawyers for the defendants, Serene Teffaha, was referred to the Legal Services Commission by Magistrate Gett over submissions he said may constitute a breach of the solicitors code of conduct. Ms Teffaha, from Advocate Me, had submitted one of the children allegedly taken by the syndicate [referring to the protective grandmother who had custody of her grandson] had been “let down” by the police and judiciary and the court was “enabling” his abuse.

“…’In my view Ms Teffaha … (those comments) may be prejudicial to or diminish the public confidence in the administration of justice,” Magistrate Gett said. “There may be a breach of your fundamental duty as a solicitor practising in the state of Queensland’.”

Ms Teffaha had stated the FACTS. In the present trial of DC and GA (as they split the trials) it has been demonstrated that the police DID let down the children. Public officers had concealed the fact that the grandson had made disclosures.

And so Magistrate Gett — unable to gauge the reality of systemic corruption around child abuse — prejudged the facts that would be later brought out in this trial. By doing so, he “eliminated” the defendant’s representation, and possibly future representation for the two men — as Pridgeon and O’Dea are now self-represented.

Could one say that the Magistrate’s actions were “prejudicial” or diminished “the public confidence in the administration of justice in any way? Did he project his own actions onto Ms Teffaha?

Projection

What does Projecting in Psychology mean?

Projection is a type of defense mechanism. In other words, “Projecting is when someone unconsciously attributes their thoughts, feelings, or behaviors to another person” (American Psychological Association). You accuse someone of doing what you are doing.

For example, in an ABC report, Dr Pridgeon and Mr O’Dea faced these headlines: “Members of alleged child-stealing syndicate committed to stand trial” and “A group of people allegedly involved in a child-stealing network, which is accused of helping women abduct children in north Queensland and hide them interstate…” and another ABC report “alleged mastermind of a network that smuggled women and children around Australia…” stating that Dr Pridgeon was financing this syndicate.

This is a case of Authorities “projecting” the reality.

They call these few elderly child protectors and grandparents a “child-stealing network”. All the media articles read with a synchronized sinister tone. But, they were PROJECTING what the government and the courts do every single day. The CHILD STEALING (wrongful child removals) is orchestrated by the staff of child protection departments and the children’s courts. I recently wrote up and distributed my extensive report to ministers and to the authorities, entitled: A REPORT ON THE EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN IN AUSTRALIA”.

I outline in detail in the report three commonwealth crimes, providing the data, the extent, and mechanisms of these crimes:

  • Conspiracy to Defeat the Course of Justice through the Children’s Courts when persons obstruct, prevent, pervert or defeat the course of justice and judicial proceedings in order to remove children,
  • Fraud Upon the Commonwealth – Misappropriation of funds, including unlawful use of material or services, causing a loss, misuse of Commonwealth assets (commonwealth taxes), and cartel conduct, etc. — e.g., persons benefitting wrongly from child department budgets, and
  • Child trafficking (i.e., wrong and unlawful removals) – identifying the trade and exploitation of children for financial gain through Out-of-home-care — i.e., Identifying the sectors and networks of people financially motivated by the continuing exploitation of their child victims.

However, I suspect my report may have entered the No-go zone as it exposes the billion-dollar racket on families and on Australian society — actions that are momentous, damaging, and far-reaching.

But back to projection. Everything these two co-defendants (Pridgeon and O’Dea) were originally accused of is a projection. They are being punished — like Ms Teffaha — for entering the no-go zone; and most notably by starting the Anti-pedophile party.  Maybe this is why they are being pursued — for wanting to expose what the Wood Commission could not do.

Exposing “Reality”

And by projecting, the more the CDPP attempt to discredit these two men, the more they are exposing the core malignancy in Australia.

These two gentlemen put their lives on hold (and on the line) to help children that had alleged child abuse. They believed their actions of support saved those children from further abuse during the time the mother and (separately) the grandmother kept these children from harm.

So as these two trials unfold it becomes clearer and clearer what has happened.

Inevitably, the prosecution was not able to exclude the allegations of child sexual abuse. Judge Clare, initially said … “whether the children were abused or not is not relevant”. But the DC and GA trial has been ALL about the sexual abuse of the children and how authorities allegedly let them down. Day after day. Testimony after testimony. But didn’t the prosecution know this all the time?

Did Judge Clare prejudge the material elements core to the trial?

So what is the now delayed Pridgeon and O’Dea trial going to expose? This is a short list, but it demonstrates how…

  • the systemic failures of the family court let children down by sending them back to live with the persons they said (allegedly) abused them. (As Heffernan said, “The family law court is disgusting and a disgrace and some of those children are a tool for attorneys” as they were in this case.)
  • the police discard children’s disclosures — when science says false reporting is extremely rare (see Palmer and Milne). It exposes the systemic problem of official denial of incest and child sexual abuse, and how public officers openly lie, saying “there were no disclosures” when there were. The system stonewalls calls for help for the children.
  • the protectors of children are automatically punished — by default — and child protectors are paraded as criminals.
  • The law states children must be protected. Child rape and abuse is a crime, and no law prescribes that children at risk should NOT be protected? It’s a legal and moral conundrum for the judicial system.
  • the judicial officers and CDPP prosecuting team seem blind to the present predicament of these three children in question — even when they have the evidence of allegations in their possession. It is criminally negligent to not protect children.
  • the media are presstitutes and reported in unison what they were fed (especially in projecting the issue of child stealing and sexual abuse). The media has totally failed these children.
  • This case further exposes the culture of the media and government agencies assisting in the suppression of child sexual abuse. “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Ministers refused to help these children.

The stark reality has been exposed — the courts of Australia do not care about the best interests of children.

Serious allegations of sexual abuse have been aired a criminal court. Should concerns be raised about the welfare of the children that remain in the custody of the persons that they said abused them? The Grandmother GA has not seen her grandson for five years — despite the grandson saying, at the time, that he only feels safe with his grandmother because it’s the only place he doesn’t … [redacted].

Everybody Will Know

But most of all, the orchestrated arrests, the distortions in the media, the original inflammatory claims, and the persistent prosecution and extravaganza of this case by the government (the CDPP) proves Senator Heffernan’s point: exposing child abuse is a NO-GO ZONE.

Australia has been named the leading country in the world for the child abuse of young girls (Palmer and Milne study). There is a denial of reality. And tens of millions of dollars have been expended in an attempt to punish two elderly gentlemen who believed they were preventing the further sexual abuse of three children.

This case proves no one really cares about children in this country and it clearly demonstrates (as Senator Heffernan said) that this statement is TRUE…

“We have in this country a compromise at the highest of levels…”

“Everybody Knows” is the title of Dr Pridgeon’s book. Everybody knows … and if they don’t, they soon will. Australia is awakening. During the Covid protests, there were many groups protesting John Howard placing a 90-year suppression order to prevent the names of 28 high-ranking people be known. Why 90 years? As Martin Luther King Jnr said… “He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it.” Was this case to send the message: Don’t dare protect a child that has disclosed sexual abuse — it’s a no-go zone?

Whereas, an immediate investigation is required as to why these three children have been “abandoned” by the police, by protection departments, and by the courts. As the Senator said, “Children are a tool for attorneys”.

The continued prosecution of the Pridgeon O’Dea case so clearly demonstrates that Australian society and especially the government needs to come to grips with the sickness within — the malevolence of abandoning (and using as “tools”) sexually abused children in Australia.

Let’s pray they do.

The 28-name speech:

 

UPDATE:

The jury was discharged today in the current trial of the mother and grandmother (DC and GA). I was told that at least three to four jury members became sick. The case will resume in October.
Thus the trial of R v Pridgeon and O’Dea has also been adjourned until possibly late November. Five years of disruption. The mother and the grandmother are possibly going to get separate trials because they didn’t even know each other — let alone conspire.
SHARE

43 COMMENTS

  1. Andrew Marvell,
    …
    Happy if in the tufted brake
    The English hunter him mistake,
    Nor lay his hounds in near
    The Caledonian deer.
    But thou, the war’s and fortune’s son,
    March indefatigably on;
    And for the last effect
    Still keep thy sword erect;
    Besides the force it has to fright
    The spirits of the shady night,
    The same arts that did gain
    A pow’r, must it maintain.

      • Interesting.
        The upcoming trial put me in mind of the very same period of history
        Only in relation to a very different scenario
        Namely Christian’s experience of an un-Godly court in John Bunyan’s “A Pilgrims Progress”

        • My 2nd fave hymn when I was a Kid:

          “He Who Would Valiant Be ‘Gainst All Disaster,
          Let Him In Constancy Follow The Master.
          There’s No Discouragement Shall Make Him Once Relent
          His First Avowed Intent To Be A Pilgrim.

          Who So Beset Him Round With Dismal Stories
          Do But Themselves Confound – His Strength The More Is.
          No Foes Shall Stay His Might; Though He With Giants Fight,
          He Will Make Good His Right To Be A Pilgrim.

          Since, Lord, Thou Dost Defend Us With Thy Spirit,
          We Know We At The End, Shall Life Inherit.
          Then Fancies Flee Away! I’ll Fear Not What Men Say,
          I’ll Labour Night And Day To Be A Pilgrim.”

  2. Nothing can stop what is coming their way ladies – nothing you are able to write, or voice your concern about, will expedite those proceedings. You have to learn to be a little more patient where real justice is concerned.

  3. The one thing that has come out of this is that the authority of the courts is in the mind of the judges only.They no longer need to be obeyed as they are no longer operating as courts at least in Qld.

    • That said, Graeme, is it not the legislators who inserted the tricks into the legislation, that have enabled these non-judges to swagger around?

    • I received a Qld cheque for jury service and it had their corporations ABN number on it. I wonder who the shareholders are?

      I also note that the Coat of Arms behind the judge had nothing to do with the Commonwealth of Australia but was a Coat of Arms given to Qld by queen Victoria in 1863.

  4. Oz courts at all levels are anti-Christian and satanic, promoting everything wrong whilst crushing everything honest and true.
    The graduates of slavemasonry are natural deceivers who have no problem subjecting everyone else to trials and tribulations they would never submit to. The tragedy here is many puppets placed in positions of authority are compromised from the get go. Our government has morphed into a Trojan horse protecting the vampires bleeding us dry.
    There seems to be no solution because enemy is on all bases loaded.

  5. Court vs Playground – What’s the difference? | WikiDiff
    https://wikidiff.com/playground/court
    is that court is an enclosed space; a courtyard; an uncovered area shut in by the walls of a building, or by different building; also, a space opening from a street and nearly surrounded by houses; a blind alley while playground is a large open space to play on, usually for children. As a verb court is to seek to achieve or win.

    • Thank you crisscross767, played tennis for about 45 years but had never thought of why I played on a court. Same is the situation of a secondary sport I played for a short time, basketball.

  7. So happy the trial has been postponed.

    There is a time and place for eveything, Cato.

    *https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAbYODvO524

  8. Very Dumb Government

    by Walter Allen Thompson
    Wednesday, January 16, 2013

    No Moral Component to This

    “…………. During the voir dire (questioning of the jurors), there was a Christian lady in the jury pool who brought her bible with her. When it was her turn to answer the questions, she made a statement to the effect that if it came down to ruling between man’s law and God’s law, she would have to rule using God’s law as her guideline. This warmed my heart hearing her say that. And the Judge Larry Burns made the following statement: “….there is no moral component to this.” This was an appalling statement but he is correct, the judicial courts do not operate on any set of moral principles……….”

    http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2013/01/no-moral-component-to-this.html

    • Who were the witnesses to the 4 babies deaths in the news lately?

      Deuteronomy 19:15 – The Testimony of Two or Three Witnesses

      https://biblehub.com/deuteronomy/19-15.htm

      ” One witness shall not rise up against a man for any iniquity, or for any sin, in any sin that he sinneth: at the mouth of two witnesses, or at the mouth of three witnesses, shall the matter be established.” New King James Version

  9. Dee a well expressed and seemingly accurate article of our society’s situation. Although the people in this particular court case are on trial, is not our society also on trial for allowing this disgusting situation to exist?

  11. Our Law Courts are privately owned for profit corporations –

    Corporations Masquerading as Government in Australia & World Wide

    https://wakeup-world.com/2012/11/09/are-corporations-masquerading-as-government-in-australia-and-world-wide/

    Australia…. the lucky country? SEC Entity Name: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA SEC Central Index Key (CIK): 0000805157 SEC Standard Industrial Code (SIC): 8880 (UNKNOWN) SEC Business Address: 1601 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW WASHINGTON DC 20036 Fiscal Year End: 0630 Well, that certainly raises some questions!

    “…………..In 1984, Letters Patent supposedly revoked the original Letters Patent of 1900 and provided new provisions for the Office of Governor-General (view Letters Patent 1984). This happened under the ‘Great Seal of Australia’, which we already know is a corporate trademark registered with the United States Patent & Trademark Office in the U.S. (view registration)

    Surely such an attempt at revocation cannot therefore be lawful? And if not, what Office is the Governor-General in Australia presently occupying? Is the person we call “Governor-General” truly a representative of an “heir and successor” to the late Queen Victoria?

    The answer appears to be NO.

    Given that the Governor-General appoints Ministers, Judges, Commissioners and Justices of the Peace, and ascribes Royal Assent as the Monarch’s representative in Australia – using the Monarch’s Seal – in the absence of a valid Governor-General, are there any legitimate government offices in Australia?

    Again… the answer appears to be NO.

    So let’s test the theory…………………”

  12. Our government is a defacto, not dejure government

    50:00 / 1:24:38
    PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, ADRIANA ESTEVEZ ON THE RISE

    Profits of punishment: the big business of Australia’s private prisons …
    https://michaelwest.com.au/profits-of-punishment-the-big-business-of-australias…
    The corporations that have benefitted from the Australian government’s privatisation of correctional services are four multinationals UK-based Serco and G4S and US-based GEO Group and MTC. Combined, they run ten privatised corrections centres across Australia.

  13. Katy Gallagher was minister for most things for about a week, from YGLpedia:
    “On 23 May 2022, after Labor’s victory at the federal election, Gallagher was sworn in as Minister for Finance, Minister for Health, Minister for Women, Minister for Social Services and Attorney-General. The portfolios of health, social services and attorney-general were only interim until the full Albanese ministry could be sworn in. She is the only holder of the Attorney-General portfolio to have had no prior legal experience, as she was appointed on the basis of holding the office for an interim period and act to “take care” of issues. On 1 June with the swearing in of the full cabinet, Gallagher was also sworn in as Minister for the Public Service. She was additionally appointed Manager of Government Business in the Senate.”

    One recorded act was to legalise and push the 4th booster, and being Minister for Finance, Health and also Attorney-General must have made it easier:
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-05-25/federal-government-expands-covid-fourth-dose-eligibility/101098304
    Notice how getting jabs into arms was a top priority even before full swearing-n for Gates’ friend Elbow. Katy “YES” Gallagher eager to oblige. Just make her minister for everything and it gets done.
    That’s what happened, but I wonder what else happened ?

    Now the ABC-TV is pushing 5th booster with “hip” advertising. The ambulances are busy taking useless eaters in to get their blood clots pulled out, with the new keyhole surgery they are up and about again after a couple of hours. Blood clots keep coming back ? Buy more health insurance and get another booster.

  14. 9 hours ago at Apple Inc.
    “Welcome to the era of spatial computing.
    Apple Vision Pro seamlessly blends digital content with your physical space.
    You navigate simply by using your eyes, hands and voice. So you can do the things you love in ways never possible. You’ve never seen everything like this before.”

    Note release date; 6.6.2023 is 1+9=1

    Anyway, probably retail for 6.66 k here in Oz.
    “Line up for the magical mystery tour”.

  15. “whether the children were abused or not is not relevant”

    wow, “four jury members became sick.”

    Judge Clare found her(assume pronoun) out. Too much heat and wow what does she know about the next few months end. Going to be a long few months for all, but they will have to swap her out, she has failed in the public gallery, that could threaten…

    • Simon, the Queensland court never had jurisdiction over Pridgeon, O’Dea, and Cling Peaches.

      It’s as simple as that. The scene did not even rise to the height of being a Star Chamber.

      Goes to show how far the “ceremony” of a courtroom can proceed when there is in fact no case legally before it.

      The human brain can imagine anyrthing, as long as the society is told that such-and-such is reality. And thanks to FORCE, questioners can be clobbered — with most of their mates approving of the clobbering.

      • I’m no expert here Mary, and in fact, may have not looked close to the “which” court is here. Federal Circuit Family Law Court has jurisdiction authority over the states and even international powers of extradition and prescription.
        Why I ran the warning flag over the moves of criminal court headed into the “hidden’ court.

        You do law and I’ll do the E.T’s – wink

    • Can’t find it on Fairfax or Murdock and didn’t see it on TV
      The lamestream media is pretending it didn’t happen

  20. If some judges are one leg tap dancin’, as in Bolivian marching powder, what just ice do we expect?
    Handguns these days 15k, so who can afford one unless getting kickbacks. It’s a club and they’re all in it, up to their necks.

    We’re all sinners, some more some less. Remember in my misfit youth, vacuuming the powder for a year or so, nearly destroyed me. Never felt so scattered ever. A horrible and insidious drug truly demonic, why would anyone desire it?

    Oz child trafficking, white powder and adrenochrome world capital by population ratio. Not something to be proud of.

  21. ABC of Communism : Nikolai Bukharin and Yevgeni Preobrazhensky : Free …

    https://archive.org/details/abc-of-communism_202102

    The ABC of Communism ( Russian : Azbuka Kommunizma) is a book written by Nikolai Bukharin and Yevgeni Preobrazhensky in 1919, during the Russian Civil War. [1] Originally written to convince the proletariat of Russia to support the Bolsheviks, it became “an elementary textbook of communist knowledge”.

    CHAPTER NINE. PROLETARIAN JUSTICE •

    § 70. The Administration of Justice in bourgeois Society
    § 71. The Election of the Judiciary by the Workers
    . 220
    § 72. Unified popular Law,courts
    § 73. Revolutionary Tribunals
    § 74. Proletarian penal Methods
    § 75. Proletarian Justice in the Future

  23. Start understanding the way things really work.

    These documents are NOT secret! They ARE a matter of Public Record.
    .
    HERE ARE TRUTHFUL FACTS MOST PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW, …. BUT SHOULD…

    The IRS is Not a US government agency.  It is an agency of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Diversified Metal Products v I.R.S et al.  CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391)
    The IMF (International Monetary Fund) is an agency of the U.N. (Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Page 816)
    The United States has NOT had a Treasury since 1921 (41 Stat. Ch 214 page 654)
    The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF (International Monetary Fund) (Presidential Documents Volume 24-No. 4 page 113, 22 U.S.C. 285-2887)
    The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States! No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over. (Executive Order 12803)
    The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never  part of the U.S. government, even though the “U.S. Government” held stock in the agencies. (U.S. v Strang, 254 US491 Lewis v. US, 680 F.2nd, 1239)
    Social Security Numbers are issued by the U.N. through the IMF (International Monetary Fund). The application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 Form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 forms and not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who publishes them while the old form states they are “Department of the Treasury”. (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111 Subpart B. 422.103 (b))
    There are NO Judicial Courts in America and have not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat 138-178)
    There have NOT been any judges in America since 1789. There have just been administrators.  (FRC v. GE 281 US 464 Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178)
    According to GATT (The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) you MUST have a Social Security number. (House Report (103-826)
    New York City is defined in Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Guiliani stated on C-Span that “New York City is the capital of the World.” For once, he told the truth. (20 CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) Chap. 111, subpart B 44.103 (b) (2) (2) )
    Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund.  (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619 Steward Co. v. Davis 301 US 548)
    Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF (International Monetary Fund), which is an agency of the United Nations. (It says “U.S. Department of Treasury” at the top left corner, which again is part of the U.N. as pointed out above)

    14.You own NO property!!! Slaves can’t own property. Read carefully the Deed to the property you think is yours.  You are listed as a TENANT. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)

    The most powerful court in America is NOT the United States Supreme court, but rather the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 PA. C.S.A. 502)
    The King of England financially backed both sides of the American Revolutionary War..   (Treaty of Versailles-July 16, 1782 Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)
    You CANNOT use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are NOT a party to it!  The U.S. Constitution applies to the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES, a privately owned and operated corporation (headquartered out of Washington, DC) much like IBM (International Business Machines, Microsoft, et al) and NOT to the people of the sovereign Republic of the united States of America.  (Padelford Fay & Co. v The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)
    America is a British Colony. The United States is a corporation, not a land mass and it existed before the Revolutionary War and the British Troops did not leave until 1796 (Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774)

    19. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVsMUpPgdT0

    Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213)
    The Pope can abolish any law in the United States (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1, 53-54)
    A 1040 Form is for tribute paid to Britain (IRS Publication 6209)
    The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery.  (Papal Bulls of 1495 & 1493)
    The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455 & 1493)
    The Pope’s laws are obligatory on everyone.  (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix, c. vii, n. 4. Prati, 1844 Syllabus Prop 28, 29, 44)
    We are slaves and own absolutely nothing, NOT even what we think are our children.  (Tillman vs. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten vs. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 438 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)
    Military dictator George Washington divided up the States (Estates) in to Districts  (Messages and papers of the Presidents Volume 1 page 99 1828 Dictionary of Estate)
    .
    “The People” does NOT include you and me. (Barron vs. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243)
    .
    It is NOT the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect THE CORPORATION and arrest code breakers. (SAPP vs. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, REiff vs. City of Phila. 477 F. 1262, Lynch vs. NC Dept. of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247)
    Every thing in the “United States” is up for sale: bridges, roads, water, schools, hospitals, prisons, airports, etc, etc… Did anybody take time to check who bought Klamath Lake?? (Executive Order 12803)

    31. “We are human capital” (Executive Order 13037)  The world cabal makes money off of the use of your signatures on mortgages, car loans, credit cards, your social security number, etc. 

    The U.N. – United Nations – has financed the operations of the United States government (the corporation of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) for over 50 years (U.S. Department of Treasury is part of the U.N. see above) and now owns every man, woman and child in America.
    The U.N. also holds all of the land of America in Fee Simple.
    The good news is we don’t have to fulfill “our” fictitious obligations. You can discharge a fictitious obligation with another’s fictitious obligation.
    .
    http://stopthepirates.blogspot.com/2012/07/these-documents-are-not-secret-they-are.html

  24. Barrel of a gun,


    he went crazy, with pride

    For Joe; 1:51
    “throw your safety overboard and join the insect nation”

    • so I was walking past a store just before Mullumbimby Santos store.(awesome retail store i recommend it shop around and they do cut price”squeezing” product as well as breathtaking organic prices).
      A shop I have used for decades(one shop east), has a glass shop front at 24″inchs(chidrens height at 6 inchs, ok get this, a leather bound red rimmed book called “Get Naked for Satan” and a queer Nick Cave book and that’s all, next to dry flower type gifts. This agenda has legs

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.