by Mary W Maxwell, LLB
Gumshoe, in the person of moi, is Sydney working on the Protective parent issue. Was in Qld yesterday and pleased to meet two Aboriginal women who have had better luck in Family Court that any I had heard of so far.
I now post this article as a quick statement about the new Legislation (I think it is a law, may be only policy) concerning the requirement to register if one is trying to influence the Australian government ON BEHALF OF A FOREIGN PRINCIPAL.
Attorney General Christian Porter says there will be penalties for those who fail to register.
A friend phoned to warn me about registering as a conspiracy theorist, related to 9-11. God knows I am a conspiracy theorist related to 9-11 (not to mention Boston Marathon, cancer, Port Arthur massacre, judicial kidnap, as I have unabashedly written books on those subjects).
The ABC has reported that someone did register as trying to influence the Oz gov’t that the US gov’t was behind 9-11. I take it that person would name the foreign principal as being a truth group? Bit confusing. They would not be doing it on behalf of the US as such.
Personal Statement
Please allow me to use the Gumshoe airwaves to make a personal statement.
I am very happy – of course – that Australia is asking people to register if they are trying to influence the Australian government on behalf of a foreign principal. Actually I am not sure they should even be allowed to try to influence our gov’t on behalf of a foreign principal.
“Who do they think they are?”
I am in favor of closed borders everywhere. Globalism is anathema to me. Humans are built to operate in groups, especially with compatriots, i.e., members of their tribe, but also as interest groups.
If I try to influence the Australian government about this or that, it would not be on behalf of a foreign principal, for Pete’s sake. When I try to influence the Australian government (and I only wish I could be effective there, but have no real hope of it!), it would be as an Aussie.
(I married into this country 39 years ago. Being a dual citizen is kind of weird, but a huge number of people are dual citizens.)
I regret the Constitution’s requirement that a citizen have only one background-allegiance if he serves in Parliament. I would think any Australian parliamentarian would know that during his time of office he has to forget his overseas loyalty. If he shows signs of doing otherwise he should be arrested for treason. I mean, come on, anyone can see that.
What about 9-11?
One wonders if the ABC’s mention of 9-11 in connection with this new law has got something to do with creating a general feeling that whistle-blower types are now under surveillance and their act may be criminalized.
Ah, now that rings a bell.
NSW Police Commissioner Mark Fuller announced a few weeks ago that he was running a Fixated Persons Investigation Unit (sans any statutory authorization, by the way). That had the effect on many people of telling them the Secret Police are descending and we should get used to it.
What utter nonsense. Shame on Police Commissioner Mark Fuller.
There is no legislation to punish “predictive crime,” and as far as I know there can never be any such legislation. Our centuries-old system of public law has to do with punishing persons for crimes they already committed.
This has never restricted society from accosting a person who looks like they are about to do some terrible crime.
Indeed MOST of the prisoners on US today are doing part of their time for conspiracy. (Sadly part of yet another game to increase the volume of incarceration. The Prosecutor ups the ante on accusation of, say, drug dealing, by adding in that the man also conspired to deal drugs.) Pathetic.
(Oh by the way, excuse me but it would be nice if the prosecutor prosecuted the government employees such as CIA agents who encourage the drug importation and sales.)
Back to the new law. Just relax. It is a good law. Let the influencers come forward and sign the register. This however has nothing to do with Australians trying to influence their government. WE ARE THE GOVERNMENT.
I mean seriously, folks, there is not a separate entity known as Government in a democracy.
Is there?
Treason
Consider this maxim of law:
Qui molitur insidias in patriam id facit quod insanus nauta perforans navem in qua vehitur.
“He who betrays his country is like the insane sailor who bores a hole in the ship which carries him.”
The notion of a new law to oversee people who would act on behalf of foreign nations serves to remind us that Australian law on treason is too closely tied to the British version which mainly safeguards the monarch. (It was added to, a few years ago, to safeguard the Prime minister.)
That is all quite by the by. New laws are needed to crack down on the “sailors” in Canberra and elsewhere who are boring a hole in our ship.
Come to think of it, as far as registries go, they need not be governmental. And the miscreant need not be the one who signs the register book. Right? It could be more like “I’ve got a little list…”
That endeavor could be taken up by fixated persons like myself…
Please comment below. But don’t name names in a defamatory way. Be discreet.
Mary
Its like signing your signature on a package that you intend on sending through the Australian Post that it is not a dangerous item. 🙂
There are a number of CIA NGO’s who should be signing but will not.
There are also a number of NGO’s not connected to intelligence agencies that should be signing
MI6 and ASIO who should be signing but won’t from their sordid and nefarious history in Australia
The Roman Catholic Church-State should be signing but probably will get a free pass card
The evil Zionist lobby groups in Australia should
Keep us posted to who signs and who hasn’t
Jews, elected to the Australian Parliament, have acted as lobbyists for Israeli interests while actively sitting as members of the Australian Parliament. Bob Carr documented this, and so far as as I know he hasn’t been forced to retract. He was however subjected to a very organised, media-driven campaign of ridicule against the book that he documented this in. Any reading of Section 44 as it stands requires that Jews not sit in the Australian Parliament and yet they remained almost completely untouched and unmentioned in the recent dual-cit fracas.
To understand who rules over you…..well you aren’t even allowed to notice let alone criticise.
And so do Muslims, but you don’t mention them? And between a Jew and a Muslim, I’d side with the Jew everytime.
Well, I wasn’t talking about them. Are they supposed to get an honorary mention every time some other poor downtrodden minority rates a mention?
I’ll remember to reference Muslims (somehow) when the subject turns to discrimination against Gay Eskimos, as it often does.
Muslims downtrodden? Where?
Oh for G-D’s sake Nemstein.
PB, I just need one example of what you believe to be downtrodden Muslims?
These seemed rather topical re influence of foreign interests:
• AIPAC’s Open Secret, Exposed by Ilhan Omar – Syrian Girl (Mimi Al Laham)
• Do You Care That Israel Controls US Politicians – Blackstone Intelligence (Jake Morphonios)
As does this which has appeared as a segment on various longer videos on the topic of 911.
• They Did 911 – Alan Sabrosky
Another group is the Freemasons, the Fabian Society that subjugate democracy or whats left of it, due process and the rule of law.
This group is the top of the mountain and they affect many countries as there is a tiered system in place and we are at the bottom of it. http://themillenniumreport.com/2015/11/the-committee-of-300-who-are-they/
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=The+committee+of+300+images&t=opera&ia=images&iax=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fsocioecohistory.files.wordpress.com%2F2017%2F09%2Fthe_venetian_black_nobility_report-satanic_pyramid_new_world_order.png
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=The+committee+of+300+images&t=opera&ia=images&iax=images&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fmstmha.files.wordpress.com%2F2014%2F09%2Ftimetowakeupppl.jpg
“Influence The Australian Government” ??????? W.T. ???? Isn’t that job of registered lobbiests ?
Since when are ordinary Australian Citizens requesting their Representatives respond to their wishes, “Influencing The Australian Government” ??????? Is that not the JOB of our representatives to LISTEN to their Constituents and respond to their wishes ????????????
So, in effect, our Politicians are leary of responding, or even listening to their constituents and wish to shut them up ?????????????
What ever happened to DEMOCRACY and our representatives responding to the wishes of the people ??????????????
I.M.H.O. Porter better get used to being back in civvie street, cause he won’t be getting re-elected come election time, that’s for sure.
Off subject and you may already know, David Icke’s visa was canceled at the last minute, whilst milo yiannopoulos” visa was reinstated. Another example if an inconsistent “liberal “government..
From memory hole: the Dee-Fraser interview. Lobbyists galore………..matter of money and those who cover-up for mass killers.
https://gumshoenews.com/2017/07/18/the-uss-liberty-and-malcolm-frasers-last-interview/
Facts You May Not Know
1.The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA was incorporated in London in 1783. The United States of America is a territory
of Great Britain. The Colonists did not win the Revolutionary War. The British troops did not leave until 1796.
Republican v. Sweets, 1 Dallas 43; Treaty, 8 Stat. 116; The Society for Propagating the Gospel & c .v. New Haven, 8 Wheat
464, Treaty of Paris (Peace), 8 Stat. 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Confederation, October 20, 1774.
King George III of England financed both sides of the Revolutionary War.
Treaty of Versailles, July 15, 1782; Treaty of Paris (Peace), 8 Stat. 80.
The IRS is not a U.S. Government agency. It is a Debt Collection Agency of the International Monetary fund (IMF).
Diversified Metal Products v. IRS, et. al.,CV-93-405E-EJE, U. S. D. C. I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148
pg. 596, Bankruptcy Reorganization PlanNo. 26, Public Law 102-391.
The IMF is an agency of the United Nations (UN).
Black’s Law, 6th Ed. pg. 816.
The U.S. has not had a Treasury since 1921.
41 Stat. Ch. 214 pg. 654.
New York City is defined in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) as the United Nations
Rudolph Giuliani stated on C-Span that “New York City is the capitol of the world” and he is correct.
20 CFR Ch. 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2).
No judicial courts, nor judges, have existed in America since 1789. Executive Administrators, not judges,
enforce Statues and Codes. FRC v. GE, 281 US 464, Keller v. PE, 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178. See also the 11th
Amendment. This was the abolishment of all inferior courts to hear cases of law or equity (this means that all courts
below the “one supreme courts”, not the U. S. Supreme Court.
You cannot use the U.S. Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it.
Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah, 14 Georgia 438, 520.
(Use instead the Bill of Rights)
You own no property. slaves cannot own property. Read the Deed to the property that you think you own.
You are listed as a Tenant. Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress, 1st. Session
We are slaves and own nothing, not even who we think are our children.
Tilman v. Roberts, 108 so. 62: Van Koten v. Koten, 154 N. E. 146; Senate document 43 and 73rd Congress
1st, Session, Wynehammer v. People, 13 N. R. REP 378, 481.
Great Britain is owned by the Vatican.
Treaty of Verona, 1213
The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (It is an presumption once again!)
Elements of Ecclesiastical Law, Vol. 1, 53,54
https://pepehateme.wordpress.com/2014/04/06/elements-of-ecclesiastical-law/
13.We are Human Capital
See Executive Order 13037
We are enemies of the State.
Trading with the Enemy Act or 1917 and 1933, October 6, 1917, under the Adr, Section 2, subdivision (c) Ch. 106
Enemy defined “other citizens of the United States…” March 9, 1933, Ch 106, Section 5, subdivision (b) of the
Act of Oct. 6, 1917 (40 sta. L. 411) amended as follows : “…any person within the United States.” Se H. R. 149
Public law No.1
15.Your name when spelled in all capital letters is a corporation:
A Cestui Que Vie Trust. —Cannon law
“The People” do not include you and me since our names are all Capital Letter fictional names.
Barron v. Mayor of city coundil of Baltimore, 32 U. S. 243
A 1040 form is for tribute paid to Great Britain (and the Vatican)
IRS Publication 6209 IMF decoding manual
Everything in the “United States” is for sale: roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, water plants, prisons, airports, etc.
(Who bought Klamath Lake in California?) See Executive Order 12803
It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest Code breakers.
Sapp. v. Tallahassee, 348 SO.2d363; Reiff v. city of Philadelphia, 477 F. Supp. 1262; Lynch v. N. C. Dept. of Justice,
376 S. E. 2d 247
The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all the other alphabet gangs were never a part of the United States Government, even
though the “U. S. Government” held shares of stock in the various agencies.
U. S. v. Strang, 254 U. S. 491; Lewis v. U. S., 6880 F.2d 1239.
“The IRS is not a U.S. Government agency. It is a Debt Collection Agency of the International Monetary fund (IMF).”
If the lender is the Federal Reserve, which we know to be a consortium of Globalist (yes, Jewish) Banks, then the IRS would by default be acting in the financial recovery interests of the loan originators, not the borrower (the US Government), therefore it follows that the IRS would be in the hands/control of a trans-national body, making the US gov. a shell through which it works that conceals its true nature.
Paul
Yes you are correct and thank you for the correction. 🙂 I have had this material for over a decade and I learned about the new information later in life and I forgot to correct it before I posted it. The banks here in Australia all have a separate individual number that goes back to the IMF as well.
IRS IS NOT A U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY
http://illuminati-news.com/irs.htm
https://famguardian.org/Publications/GreatIRSHoax/GreatIRSHoax.htm
Who owns the federal reserve bank?
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5h8177/who_owns_the_federal_reserve_bank/
The same Jesuits controls the IRS and every other government entity so the Federal Reserve would never be audited.
President Kennedy The Fed And Executive Order 11110
https://prepareforchange.net/2019/01/29/president-kennedy-the-fed-and-executive-order-11110/
The point being made is that the IRS taxes you pay aren’t used for government services.
Federal Reserve: Jesuits Treachery at its Finest
https://inpursuitofhappiness.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/jesuits-treachery-at-its-finest
The Sinking of the Titanic to create the Federal Reserve
http://www.metatech.org/wp/conspiracy/sinking-the-titanic-create-federal-reserve-bank/
The impotent UN, EU, ICC, WHO, IMF, World Bank, NATO, G8 and G20 – created by the pedophilic Vatican
http://presscore.ca/the-un-the-eu-the-icc-the-who-the-imf-the-world-bank-and-nato-were-all-created-by-the-vatican-to-enslave-the-world/
Freedom from slavery is an internationally recognized human right. “No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.” Economic slavery is what the Vatican controlled UN, the EU, the ICC, the WHO, the IMF, the World Bank, and NATO and the G8/G20 have in mind for the World population – slavery is sought by these organizations as a legal institution or socio-economic system. The US is the perfect example of a government imposing a socio-economic slavery upon its citizens. The US government has been spending millions to brainwash the American people into believing that the US economic system is an exercise of free enterprise and that they are spending $trillions in support of free enterprise. That is totally false. The US abandoned free enterprise long ago in the aftermath of WW I in favor of Mussolini’s Catholic “corporatism,” i.e., economic fascism, where Big Business, Big Government, and Big Finance combines to exploit the people with monopolized prices and a corrupted currency. Since Obama became the first non-American to become the president of the United States of America he has made economic fascism his presidential priority where Big Business, Big Government, and Big Finance have been formed to exploit the people with monopolized prices and a corrupted currency.
BIS
https://geopolitics.co/2015/04/12/bank-for-international-settlements-bis-the-vaticans-central-bank/
Australian Tax Office Illegal Entity? It appears so
http://larryhannigan.com/australian_tax_office_is_an_illegal_entity.htm
Stop the Illegal Australian Tax Office
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Stop-the-illegal-Australian-Tax-Office/198251116872691
Australian Tax Office has Illegal Powers to Search Your Home (Law to be revoked asap!)
Australian tax office “not a legal entity”
http://www.australiamatters.com/cms/?p=125
ATO is not a legal entity by its own admission
http://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7402
The ATO is also a private, foreign owned business,
http://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7402
Hence it is called “Office”, not “Department.” If the ATO denies being foreign owned private business, make them sign a JP witnessed
Statutory Declaration so they can perjure themselves.
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/tax.htm
Is the ATO operating legally? – http://www.itwillpass.com/tax_ato_not_legal.shtml
ATO is an Illegal Entity – http://www.itwillpass.com/tax_ato_non_legal_entity.shtml
ATO (Australian Tax Office) Is illegal By Its Own Admission – Lifting The Veil of Deception -http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/130
High Court Transcript – Moeliker v Chapman B8/2000 (17 May 2000)
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/hca/transcripts/2000/B8/1.html
http://www.loveforlife.com.au/files/ATO-illegal%20entity%20by%20it's%20own%20admission-actual%20docs%20to%20prove%20it-1.pdf
http://www.itwillpass.com/tax_ato_non_legal_entity.shtml
http://www.brumbywatchaustralia.com/Principality12.htm
http://www.brumbywatchaustralia.com/Principality40.htm
Australia Taxation Office aka ATO
Talk about SEDITION TREASON
Aussie Government collusion
According to this presenter, ex PM Malcom Turnbull, Julie Bishop, Alexander Downer and George Brandis is going to be indicted shortly for their part of attempting to overthrow a duly elected president of a foreign country and colluding with another country to do so the UK.
1st Comment
I have seen three Youtube videos mentioning Alexander Downer and also how Australia and the UK illegally spied on President Elect Trump and how they continued to spy on him after he was elected President. Both governments then went through diplomatic channels to keep this secret from both countries. I think the Whittaker is the name you wanted. as AG. They have had to cleanse the Department of Justice and the FBI of criminal elements at the highest level prior to getting Judge Kavanaugh in office. Then they can commence the military tribunals against these traitors, murderers, pedophiles, blackmailing and bribing, sedition etc. As ex Prime Minister Turnbull was in office at the time and President Trump, Q and others were quite angry about this illegal spying between allies. The Americans have done it in the past as well. So the Gang of Four or more Malcolm Turnbull, Julie Bishop the Minster for Foreign Affairs, George Brandis the High Commissioner to the UK and Alexander Downer who was the High commissioner in London. I would add the insidious criminal CIA who have most certainly infiltrated the Australian intelligence services which is quite obvious in a number of areas. This is High Treason of helping a foreign government to oust a democratically elected President of another country. If this is so, I hope all get properly indicted and charged with stiff jail terms and fined heavy penalties.
AUSSIE TREASON
Aussie Treason Part 2
Australian Government Acts of Treason 1/4
“concerning the requirement to register if one is trying to influence the Australian government ON BEHALF OF A FOREIGN PRINCIPAL.”
I note the word PRINCIPAL has been used instead of the word POWER. Would this be to protect all those politicians, lobbyists, judiciary, media commentators etc who are catholic?
As I understand religion, a believers first loyalty is to god an then to the Vatician. Is not the Vatician a FOREIGN POWER?
I recently contact 7 senators in my state seeking to have a 10 minute meeting with them about the Constitution and Senator Culleton. All 7 refused to meet with me.
As part of this attempt I looked up these 7 senators and the schools they had attended as a child were listed in their bio one web page I found.
ALL but one or two of them had all been to catholic schools. My question is, how can these senators claim they are not trying to influence the Australian government ON BEHALF OF A FOREIGN PRINCIPAL/POWER when their first loyalty is to god and then the pope meaning the vatican??
I assume all these senators have all registered themselves as agents of a foreign PRINCIPAL, or, is this legislation only meant to apply to those who commoners who critise the Australian Government?
I regret the Constitution’s requirement that a citizen have only one background-allegiance if he serves in Parliament.
MM – Any citizen of any commonwealth country can stand for election to the Commonwealth of Australia Parliament. I don’t agree with it but its there.
How much more absurd can it get when politicians in the senate resigned over duel citizenship when they did not need to, considering the role of the senate is to review bills coming up out of the House of Representatives to ensure, among other things, they are consistent with the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution.
It is nothing short of bizarre and makes a mockery of Australia internationally.
Now we all know why the don’t teach the Constitution in schools in Australia.
Our Constitution is written in legalese – and that kind of recording has a zombie effect on those who find the wording too difficult to comprehend.
The kind of writing format in our original Constitution would not pass the zombie effect in schools today.
So, I would suggest that we need a more easily readable Bill of Rights that explains in layman’s terms the intention of the Constitution – much along the same lines as the American Bill of Rights to get things moving along to where they should have been on January, 1st, 1901, instead of the watered version of the American Constitution, that they deemed to give us.
I very strongly disagree with a Bill of Rights on the grounds that the rights should be written into the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution. That is where they belong.
By putting them into the constitution we can word it so a referendum must, not should, not can, not may, not shall, but MUST be held to change even on letter or one full stop in those rights.
kevin, any Bill of Rights can only come from the law of the land, a Constitution. My suggesting is that a Bill of Rights makes understanding of the Constitution much easier for the less ‘educated’ among us.
I am not suggesting that a Bill of Rights be a separate set of laws unto itself.
The influencing of the Australian government has become a centralized system of continual influence over this country, ever since we have had an ‘Australian Government’.
Before then, it was the individual colonies of this land who were ‘influenced’.
And that ‘influence’ is hidden in plain sight that many simply cannot, or refuse to see.
If this were not so, then we would no longer put up with our ‘minsters of the crown’ swearing allegiance to a foreign monarch and not to the Australian Constitution and the Australian people.
Their oath of office is to a foreign system of control, so, Is it really any wonder why our pollies have never felt the need to represent us, those who actually vote them onto the gravy train?
Sorry but you are off track a little here. The queen as in Queen Elisabeth is the head of power and is subject to the law. This is signified by the placing of the crown on the monarchs head during the coronation ceremony. This symbolises that the Queen and her heirs and successors, as head of power, is subject to the same laws as as everyone else.
IMO this is a good thing.
I assume the ‘Australian Government’ you are referring to is the legal entity Whitlam started when he and all the entire parliament committed treason and or treachery, when they usurped and attempted to overthrow the Constitution?
There is a mechanism in the constitution for altering the constitution via referendum but Whitlam said stuff that, Im just going to start a new government
Kevin, do some more research. The Queen has no real authority and represents a foreign interest in that she is the shop front for the Central Bankers – Rothschild, Rockefeller et al whose Banks control this world that our pollies all swear allegiance to.
Do you honestly believe that taking an oath of office by our elected and non-elected officials that excludes upholding the Australian Constitution and the welfare of the Australian people is not a deliberate act of treachery?
Is it not true that the Founding Fathers of the Australian Constitution created a Federation? All that I have observed over the past 4 decades is insidious incremental Centralisation Centralisation…
Were the Founding Fathers naive about how politics undermines the often touted ‘democratic process’ and the rule of law? Was it a Federation in name only or was it provided with the proper checks and balances to be vigilant over government?
Many of us know that the Westminster system is undemocratic with their regular coup de tats of Prime Ministers without any participation of the electorate. We don;t have a Recall system as other countries enjoy in a Participatory Democracy to get rid of inept or corrupt politicians. We don’t have a Peoples’s Referendum to direct or guide Australia to want we want or what we don’t want.
Disadvantages of Federation
https://www.awamipolitics.com/disadvantages-of-federation-7868.html
The politics of the Australian federal system https://www.aph.gov.au/binaries/library/pubs/rb/2006-07/07rb04.pdf
Executive summary
The Australian Constitution established a federal nation, where powers were to be shared by
the national (Commonwealth) government and the six member states. The constitution writers were generally pleased with their efforts in creating a federal system in which the
states were to be significant players.
Optimistic words about the division of power in the Australian federation have not been
borne out. Many factors have worked to weaken the federal structure:
• government perspectives have often worked to boost national government power
• the national government has increasingly controlled the national purse-strings
• states have become increasingly dependent on grants from the Commonwealth
• international events have tended to give more power to the national government
• the Australian community has tended to look increasingly to the national government for
assistance in many matters formerly the sole preserve of the states
• High Court decisions have tended to increase Commonwealth power, and
• Commonwealth governments have tended to focus on their own needs, policies and
preferences before those of the states or territories, with an implicit assumption that the
national view is the one that should be preferred in times of debate and argument.
Changes in society have also had an impact on the federal system:
• Australians have raised their expectations of what they can gain from government
• the Commonwealth is increasingly seen as most likely to see that people’s needs are met
• internal migration has created a frustration with different laws and regulations in each state
• the development of large national businesses has been affected by the lack of a true
common market, and
• the great increase in the size of cities has shown weaknesses in the system.
Such factors have all increased the level of criticism directed at the federal system.
Judicial Review and Nullification Remedy for States and Federal
GovernmentThe CORPORATION GOVERNMENT or the unconstitutional CORPORATION needs to be UN-INCORPORATED! We are under a ruse and unfortunately most people are unaware of it. The separation of powers is a myth and people need to understand and realise it is a myth and a complete fiction. I will endeavor to prove it to you as it is not difficult to provide the correct information and evidence.
Most Americans & Australians do not understand the type of system that we have unfortunately, nor do they understand the framework of what is ‘supposed’ to be. Both are ruled and controlled by foreign dictation. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ABN CORPORATION vs. The United States of America and THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA vs. the Commonwealth of Australia. Both Corporation NAMES are registered in Washington D.C. for those who do not know. This knowledge seems to become more widespread now. We are dealing with, or should I say the ‘commercial entities’ is dealing with us. Let me be quite clear and frank.
We are not under the auspices and protection of a genuine and legitimate government as we all think of government and what that means and how we were taught in school.
Only the people can reclaim democracy http://www.cla.asn.au/News/only-the-people-can-reclaim-democracy/
Corruption fighter Tony Fitzgerald made these comments in association with the 2014 Griffith University Tony Fitzgerald Lecture in September…
It would not occur to today’s politicians that power should be used only for the State’s “peace welfare and good government” or that legal requirements are conventionally supplemented by ethical norms.
Political reform is therefore a task for the community. If Queenslander’s want a free, fair, tolerant society, good governance and honest public administration, a sufficient number of voters must make it clear that they will decline to vote for any party which does not first satisfy them that it will exercise power only for the public benefit.
It’s difficult to perceive what legitimate reason a party seeking election in a democracy could have for declining to make commitments such as the following:
the public to be fully and accurately informed promptly and not to be misled;
all government decisions and actions to be taken for the common benefit without regard to personal, political or other considerations;
all people to be treated equally with no person given special treatment or superior access or influence; and
all public appointments to be made on merit.
Effective democracy needs principled politicians, an independent, impartial judiciary plus, as the American author Norman Mailer said, “individuals not only ready to enjoy freedom but to undergo the heavy labor of maintaining it.” That task includes blunt criticism of political misconduct. As President John F. Kennedy said, “without debate, without criticism no administration and no country can succeed and no republic can survive.”
Thank you Arlyn – you have put much effort into explaining what many of us do not understand how we have been hoodwinked for so long.
Trump is setting about correcting so many wrongs – we must wait our turn in correcting ours. But it will come.
Thanks and appreciation to Arlyn for sharing your incredible depth and scope of research here and in recent Gumshoe threads. I continue to just kick over the odd pebble and say hey, look – this is worth sharing …
There may be a few emotive phrases here but I could not fault this article for the facts – the best summary since reading the books by M. S. (Mike) King
https://demstuermer.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/familiar-killers-eager-to-start-world-war-3/
Jullus
Thanks for the kind words of appreciation. With age comes wisdom. 🙂 We all have things to share and contribute.
As it would be hard to find anything more ALIEN to the Canberra mob than the truth about 9/11 and as having said fact set down on an official record would be the last damn thing any of the members would want, seems like there’s a handful of somebodies who are seriously on the ball.
And given how dense every single member actually is, I seriously doubt that the penny’s even dropped.
What a hoot!
Actually it appears only one soul was behind the manoeuvre but as it made ABC headlines it was better than a public-egging
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-03-11/transparency-register-designed-to-expose-foreign-influence-fitr/10888066
“the head of the Australian Operations of Major International Non-Government Organisations told the ABC the legislation is “unworkable” because of definitions that are ‘quite ambiguous’ “
Really ? I’d have thought “counter-productive” was the word.
“The legislation was backed by the Opposition. Shadow Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus was unavailable for comment”
Which I guess proves that Jews still aren’t quite as stupid as Goyim
Please see my anti-monarchy article of May 2018:
.
https://gumshoenews.com/2018/05/06/with-all-due-respect-the-queen-must-go/
The U. S. Declaration of Independence was based on the fact that it was being fleeced by the Brits. A 21st Century Aus equivalent could only be bought about by axing trade relations & real estate deals with China. As the native Government has a major investment in the same that’s not going to happen. The Country doesn’t even have the military capacity to stand up to Indonesia in any case.
A strong voice from the desert.
Restore our constitution, local councils are not governments
Eisenhower Warns of the military industrial complex
President John F Kennedy Secret Society Speech
Australia has been ‘captured’ by the US, the UK, and the Israeli Lobby with the Fascist trans-corporations who control the direction of Australia, as it is a mere docile and subservient ‘client state’ that does not enjoy its own national sovereignty. It is on public record with many sources and in the Hansard that the CIA overthrew our democratically elected government and the Australian politicians did absolutely nothing to stop it! http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1976/jan/28/cia (He did not answer the question concerning: it is indulged in by the CIA in this country and elsewhere, does the Minister recollect that in the recent evidence given by the CIA to a Congressional committee of inquiry the CIA claimed a second interest—namely, political intervention in the hope of influencing political developments in other countries?
Secondly we also have an Australian oligarchy and a military industrial complex that is in the hands of those who want perpetual war with the US Fascist Neo-cons. It is called ‘The Project for the New American Century’. 9/11was the New Pearl Harbour for them to initiate these false flag wars globally to encircle Russia and China and to carve up the Middle East for the Zionist Israel to create a ‘Greater Israel’ as the Zionist Israelis want to expand their murderous and thieving ideology as well as their population back to the Ukraine and elsewhere. The ‘Project’ envisages 100 years of war to weaken nations and to control nations world-wide. There are many aspects of global tyranny to consider and this is not for the weak-hearted.
It has absolutely nothing to do with establishing democracy as their last excuse amongst many to invade countries that were no threat to America or Australia. When and if we see a revolution in American then we will know that they are trying to re-establish democracy, due process and the rule of law which has been thrown out the window in the U.S. Both countries are using the ideology of ‘dominion theology’ which is to take by force by whatever means.
Australia’s Role as a Dutiful Client State
http://antonyloewenstein.com/tag/israel-lobby/
A rare voice of establishment dissent came from Paul Barratt, a former intelligence analyst and former secretary of the Department of Defence. He worried that public trust was breached by Australian politicians so uncritically accepting the goals of two foreign powers, Israel and America.
“Israel Lobby Controls Australian Foreign Policy”—Former Foreign Minister Bob Carr
http://davidduke.com/israel-lobby-controls-australian-foreign-policy-former-foreign-minister-bob-carr/
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-04-09/bob-carr-lashes-out-at-melbourne-pro-israel-lobby/5379074
CIA Involvement in Australia
http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query%3DId%3A%22hansard80%2Fhansardr80%2F1977-05- 04%2F0098%22
Observation and Recommendations
1. Australians do not get to choose their own Prime Minster which is a sham on democracy. It is the Westminster system
2. Australia does not have a ‘Recall system’ to thrown out those corrupt politicians and for those who do not ‘represent’ them. 3.Australia does not have a ‘Direct Democracy’ for the ‘People’s Referendum” to decide on important issues and the future direction of this country.
4. Politicians make ‘edicts’ and call ‘mandates’ when they have no right or authority from the electorate to do so.
5. We do not have ‘Proportional Representation’ in both Houses.
6. The electorate is forced to vote for other parties instead of one vote one value with no preferences. This would stop the wheeling and dealing between the political parties.
7. We have two Commonwealth of Australia’s operating in this country, one is the genuine Australian and the other is the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA registered business NAME registered in Washington D.C. by the Americans.
8. We need to get rid of the insidious Federal Reserve (private banking cabal) which is not federal and there are no reserves and print our own money without interest rates or charge.
9. The AEC needs to be restructured and reformed as it is bias toward the political parties and not the electorate.
10. Far too much secrecy with governments particularly with past treaties and the present TPP. Australian politicians are not making the best decisions for the benefit of its citizens and the Commonwealth of Australia as a whole.
Definition of Usurp-Usurpation
Latin usurpare to take possession of without legal claim
to seize and hold (as office, place, or powers) in possession by force or without right
Encroach or infringe upon (someone’s rights)
The unlawful seizure or assumption of sovereign power; the assumption of government or supreme power by force or illegally, in derogation of the
constitution and of the rights of the lawful ruler. Black’s Law Law Dictionary: What is USURPATION? (Black’s Law Dictionary)
The Rescinding of Australia’s Treason Laws invoked by ex-PM Fabian Bob Hawke and ex-PM Keating.
https://www.rightsforbendigoresidents.org/reinstate-australias-treason-laws/#respond
High treason 2 : Can Australia legally become a republic? No!
http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/8997177?selectedversion=NBD1410978
National security and anti-terrorism laws in Australia
http://www.thenewsmanual.net/Resources/medialaw_in_australia_06.html
Treason: Defunct or Dormant?
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MonashULawRw/2000/6.pdf
Where are the treason laws of Australia and is it possible?
http://www.justanswer.com/australian-law/2dgjr-treason-laws-australia-possible.html
De facto court
One established, organized, and exercising its judicial functions under authority of a statue apparently valid, though under authority of a statue may be in fact unconstitutional and may be afterwards so adjudged; or a court established and citing under the authority of a de facto government . 1 Bl. Judgm. 173; in re Manning, 139 U.S. 504, 11 s. Ct. 624, 35 L.Ed. 264; Gildemeister v. Lindsay, 212 Mich. 299, 180 N.W. 633, 635.
The above list is not comprehensive only in Black’s Law Dictionary.
http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/D/DeFacto.aspx
A de facto government is one which has seized power by force or in any other unconstitutional method and governs in spite of the
existence of a de jure government.
“De facto characterizes a state of affairs which, for all practical purposes, must be accepted notwithstanding its illegality or illegitimacy. The de facto doctrine is sometimes engaged to uphold rights, obligations and other effects which are said to have arisen under an enactment later held to be without constitutional integrity.”
(This is where you have Judicial Dictatorship and it should go to a Referendum to the people in the view of Thomas Jefferson and President Theodore Roosevelt. If the majority of people in a democratic government in which we presently do not have in Australia, disagrees with the Supreme Court decision, it goes to the people or an amendment is legislated on and before for the people so that you always have this healthy tension of checks and balances between the Executive, Legislative, the Judiciary and ‘We the People’ Remember it is our constitution not theirs! It is in the book ‘Judicial Dictatorship’)
In a 1910 publication on the de facto doctrine, Albert Constantineau wrote:
“The de facto doctrine is a rule or principle of law which, in the first place, justifies the recognition of the authority of governments established and maintained by persons who have usurped the sovereign authority of the State, and asset themselves by force and arms against the lawful government; secondly, which recognizes the existence of, and protects from collateral attack, public or private bodies corporate, which, though irregularly or illegally organized, yet, under colour of law, openly exercises the powers and functions of regularly created bodies; and, thirdly, which imparts validity to the official acts of persons who, under colour of right or authority, hold office under the aforementioned governments or bodies, or exercise lawfully existing offices of whatever nature, in which the public or third persons are interested, where the performance of such official acts is for the benefit of the public or third persons, and not for their own personal advantage….
“Again, the doctrine is necessary to maintain the supremacy of the law and to preserve peace and order in the community at large, since any other rule would lead to such uncertainty and confusion, as to break up the order and quiet of all civil administration. Indeed, if any individual or body of individuals were permitted, at his or their pleasure, to challenge the authority of and refuse obedience to the government of the state and the numerous functionaries through whom it exercises its various powers, or refuse to recognize municipal bodies and their officers, on the ground of irregular existence or defective titles, insubordination and disorder of the worst kind would be encouraged, which might at any time culminate inanarchy.”
Again the above statements are treasonous to say the least! Over-throwing a government is treason and sedition and all of those who are responsible should be charged appropriately.
http://truth-now.net/de-jure-government-or-de-facto/
For a relevant definition let’s witness several court cases …..
Ex-judge hits out at ‘elected dictatorship’
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/exjudge-hits-out-at-elected-dictatorship/2007/05/15/1178995158740.html
“But in a society such as Australia’s, a bill of rights would not be operating in isolation. It would instead be supported by democratic government, an independent judiciary, an independent press and a culture that values respect for human rights.”
The Lion that Squeaked: Representative Government and The High Court
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/SydLRev/1996/19.pdf
In a later case, Theophanous v The Herald & Weekly Times Ltd,6 a smaller majority7 of the Court found that the newly found freedom could override not only Commonwealth laws but also State laws and the common law.
Herbert W Briggs (of the Board of Editors) (American Society of International Law), in an article entitled DE FACTO and DE JURE RECOGNITION:THE ARANTZAZU
MENDI states: “In The ARANTZAZU MENDI we find Slessor L.J.,for the Court of Appeal, quoting Bankes, L.J., in Luther vs Sagor, who quoted Wheaton, who
quoted Montague Bernard that…
A de jure government is one which, in the opinion of the person using the phrase ought to posses the powers or sovereignty, though at the time may be deprived of them.
A de facto government is one which is really in possession of them, although the possession may be wrongful or precarious”. That explanation perfectly describes the context of ‘de-jure’ used on this website. De jure is by rightful entitlement. De facto is by claim; without entitlement. http://www.google.com.au/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=Royal+commissions+in+australia&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF- 8&gfe_rd=cr&ei=1Ew0VYrgLsuN8Qfm3YCYDg
Did the CIA interfere in Aussie politics?
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/02/18/did-cia-interfere-aussie-politics
Michael Glennon author of “Double Government: wrote
“the public believes that constitutionally-established institutions control national security policy, but that view is mistaken. Judicial review is negligible, congressional (parliamentary) review is dysfunctional and Presidential (Ministerial ) control is nominal. Absent a more informed and engaged electorate and you have ‘double Government. As applied to the US – U.S national Security policy is by the network of executive officials who manage the Departments and Agencies responsible for protecting U.S National Security and who responding to structural incentives embedded in U.S political system operate largely removed from public view and from constitutional constraints”
http://www.amazon.com.au/National-Security-Government-Michael-Glennon-ebook/dp/B00NGO9E6I
http://www.amazon.com/National-Security-Government-Michael-Glennon/dp/0190206446
http://harvardnsj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Glennon-Final.pdf
National Security and Double Government
http://harvardnsj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Glennon-Final.pdf Sovereignty http://www.hawaii-nation.org/sovereignty.html
The original people not the aboriginal people also have their sovereignty and they have not relinquished their land
Mark McMurtrie Important facts regarding sovereignty in Australia (Listen to his videos as he is original not aboriginal) http://www.google.com.au/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=youtube+Mark+Mcurtie&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF- 8&gfe_rd=cr&ei=26oxVbHAD6qN8QfW4oBg
The secret country again wages war on its own people
http://rt.com/op-edge/252089-australia-indigenous-aboriginal-people-war/
Whose Sovereignty? Empire Versus International Law
http://www.legalaffairs.org/issues/September-October-2002/feature_teitel_sepoct2002.msp
Whose Sovereignty? Empire Versus International Law
https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/publications/journal/18_3/articles/5052.html/_res/id=sa_File1/5052_Cohenforweb.pdf
THE ASYMMETRY OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS
http://www.murdoch.edu.au/School-of-Law/_document/WA-jurist-documents/WAJ_Vol3_2012_Greenfeld—The-Asymmetry-of-the- Separation-of-Powers.pdf
This requires that the judiciary, the executive and the legislature all remain distinct from each other to ensure that the different arms of government do not encroach upon each other. The quote that this essay will be addressing is whether the separation of powers doctrine has been compromised to such an extent that it no longer exists. This essay will critically address this by firstly defining the separation of powers doctrine and examining the history of the separation of powers doctrine. Also this essay will show the degree to which the doctrine has been compromised. Although the doctrine has been compromised to an extent, it still upholds the vital and necessary principles that protect the rights of the people from an abuse of power by the government.
(Last sentence:That is a matter of opinion and needs to be tested)
The separation of powers doctrine requires that each arm of government should be separate and not exercise the powers or functions of the others. The Australian government does not strictly comply with the separation of powers doctrine because the legislature and the executive are not completely separated. Australia maintains a system of responsible
government, which upholds the principle that the executive be responsible to the legislature, yet Ministers are members of both the legislature and the executive. Additionally, the legislature may confer power and delegate legislation to the executive government.
(There is definitely a ‘Conflict of interest” between the legislature and the executive and it is unhealthy and less democratic than the Jeffersonian model. The draconian legislation of ‘terror laws’ sustains this view with the constant encroachment of civil liberties and the incremental surveillance state apparatus)
However, at a state level there is no legislative inclusion of the separation of powers into state Constitutions.20 Since the High Court decision of Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW)21 there has been an inclusion of the doctrine in the states. The High Court held that as a state court may exercise federal judicial power,22 there should be no distinction between federal courts exercising federal judicial power and state courts exercising federal judicial power.23 A recent decision of the High Court has upheld this view of state courts conforming to the doctrine. This will be discussed in more detail below in context of how the doctrine has been compromised. It should be noted that any court that does not exercise any federal judicial power is not subject to the separation of powers doctrine.25
IV HAS THE DOCTRINE BEEN COMPROMISED?
The two key principles of the separation of powers doctrine is that Ch III courts cannot be vested with non-judicial power and that federal judicial power can only be vested in a Ch III court.26 It is these principles that, if compromised, can lead to an abuse of power.
A Chapter III Courts exercising non-judicial power
If a Ch III Court exercises non-judicial power then the separation of powers doctrine will be violated. The principle of ‘Judicial
Independence’ states that if the judiciary starts exercising administrative functions then its independence will be negated. The independence of both federal and state courts is an integral part of protecting and implementing the rule of law. This essay will discuss the compromise of this principle in relation to state and federal courts. (Italics mine)
Judicial power has been defined by a number of sources as a number of different functions.30 However there are several common features that indicate that judicial power is being exercised. These are that the power exercised is directed at settling controversies, the power is exercised to determine rights, liberty or property,32 and the body that exercises the power reaches a conclusive decision. If a Ch III court exercises power that is non-judicial in nature then this will be in violation of the separation of powers doctrine and the Constitution.
The states do not have an explicit separation of powers in their respective Constitutions. The High Court decided there is now an inclusion of state courts that exercise federal judicial power into the doctrine,36 as state courts are part of an integrated system of which the federal courts are the peak. Kable held that
state courts that are vested with federal judicial power are not able to be given non-judicial power by the State Parliament that would be incompatible with
their exercising of the federal judicial power. However since this decision the High Court has determined that there will only be an incompatibility between the state vesting power and a courts exercise of federal judicial power in a few select circumstances. These circumstances are: where state legislation attempts to alter or interfere with the working of the federal judicial system established by Chapter III; or where state legislation vests power on state courts that affects their capacity to exercise federal jurisdiction invested under Chapter III impartially and competently. This decision has been upheld by a recent High Court case.41 Parliaments are able to vest the courts that are exercising federal judicial power with non-judicial powers so long as the powers do not undermine their institutional integrity. The state courts are still independent in their judicial decision making
process as this principle requires that the courts maintain ‘substantial discretion’ when deciding a matter.
Federal courts have always been maintained with a stricter separation of powers principle. This is expressly stated in the Constitution, entrenched in common law and has also been upheld on appeal by the Privy Council. Yet, over the years some exceptions have arisen which have enabled Ch III courts to
be vested with non-judicial power.
The purpose of this principle is to separate the exercising of judicial power from the exercising of non- judicial power. Isaacs J stated that the defining feature of Ch III courts is that they exercise judicial power that is completely independent and impartial. If the main functions of a court are non-judicial, then vesting that court with federal judicial power will be invalid even if the court is established on the same basis as that of a Ch III court.
Secondly courts may exercise minor administrative functions that are essentially administrative functions but quasi-judicial in nature.These decisions are valid due to the requirement that they are subject to judicial control/review. Lastly s49 of the Constitution provides that both houses of Parliament may determine whether contempt of parliament has been committed. This is to promote efficiency as it gives Parliament the power to govern its own affairs and
establishes power to deal with persons who may interfere with the functioning of Parliament.
V CONCLUSION
The separation of powers doctrine is entrenched in the Constitution. It provides checks and balances on the Government of the day by ensuring that each arm of government remains separate and distinct from each other. In Australia the separation of
powers doctrine is asymmetrical, with the legislative and executive arms of government becoming quite compromised. However the main principle of the separation of powers doctrine is that the judiciary remain completely distinct from the other two arms of government. In Australia the judiciary has to an extent been compromised, especially at a state level. The High Court has often protected the separation of powers doctrine from an encroachment by the government and has provided a long precedent of doing so. However even if compromised to a small extent, the separation of powers doctrine will always remain in acting force to protect individual rights and liberties as can be seen through many High Court decisions and, most importantly, because it is expressed in the Constitution. (That remains to be seen and reviewed: many questions)
Separation of Powers: Parliament, Executive and Judiciary Australia does not have a complete separation of powers because some of the roles of the Parliament, the Executive and the Judiciary overlap. For example, the Prime Minister and ministers are part of the Executive and the Parliament. High Court judges, the Prime Minister and ministers are officially appointed by the Governor-General, who is part of the Parliament and the Executive
Separation of Powers: Parliament, Executive and Judiciary Australia does not have a complete separation of powers because some of the roles of the Parliament, the Executive and the Judiciary overlap. For example, the Prime Minister and ministers are part of the Executive and the Parliament. High Court judges, the Prime Minister and ministers are officially appointed by the Governor-General, who is part of the Parliament and the Executive
Separation of roles
Exceptions to the principle
Australia does not have a complete separation of powers because some of the roles of the Parliament, the Executive and the Judiciary overlap. For example, the Prime Minister and ministers are part of the Executive and the Parliament. High Court judges, the Prime Minister and ministers are officially appointed by the Governor-General, who is part of the Parliament and the Executive. (Bold emphasis mine)
Constitutional Aspects of Judicial Independence
http://www.judcom.nsw.gov.au/publications/education-monographs-1/monograph1/fblane.htm
JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE FROM THE EXECUTIVE
POWER
ROLE
COMPOSITION
Parliament
The Parliament makes and amends the law
Parliament (also referred to as the Legislature) is made up of the Queen (represented by the Governor- General), the Senate and the House of Representatives
Executive
The Executive puts the law into action
The Executive is made up of the Queen (represented by the Governor-General), Prime Minister and ministers
Judiciary
The Judiciary makes judgements about the law
The Judiciary is made up of the High Court and other federal courts
http://www.jca.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/P62_02_09-Judicial-Independence-from-the-Executive-June-2014.pd
http://www.peo.gov.au/learning/fact-sheets/separation-of-powers.html
THE UNITED STATES IS STILL A BRITISH COLONY
http://www.apfn.org/apfn/bcolony.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Nations
The Commonwealth of Nations, commonly known as the Commonwealth (formerly the British Commonwealth),[1] is an intergovernmental organisation of 53 member states[2] that were mostly territories of the former British Empire. The Commonwealth operates by intergovernmental consensus of the member states, organised through the Commonwealth Secretariat, and non- governmental organisations, organised through theCommonwealth Foundation.[3]
“Americans were fooled into believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising New England were independent nation states, but they never were nor are today. They were and still are |Colonies of the CrownTemple, through letters patent and charters, who have no legal authority to be independent from the rule and order of theCrownTemple. A legal state is a Crown Temple Colony.”
“Neither the American people nor the Queen of Britain own America. The CrownTemple owns America through the deception of those who have sworn their allegiance by oath to the Middle Temple Bar. The Crown Bankers and their Middle Templar Attorneys rule America through unlawful contracts, unlawful Taxes, and contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but’ legal’, orders, rules and codes of the Crown Temple Courts, or so called ‘Judiciary’ in America. This is because the CrownTemple holds the land titles and estate deeds to all of North America.”
Queen Elizabeth II is a False Monarch Closely Related to The Rothschilds and The Vatican
Her powers include: Queen Elizabeth II
The power to choose the prime ministers and to dismiss the prime ministers either directly in Britain, or through her governor generals in Commonwealth countries.
The power to dismiss ministers and the government.
The power to dissolve parliament and call new elections.
The power to refuse legislation passed by parliament.
The power to command the armed forces and raise a personal militia.
The power to read confidential government documents and intelligence reports.
The power to declare a state of emergency and issue proclamations.
The power to call elections and enact laws in her majesties name.
Not a single law is passed without the queen’s consent.
The power to exercise “Crown Prerogatives” which means the monarch can declare war through her prime minister, without the agreement of parliament.
The power to grant and bestow titles like “Sir”.
The power to pardon convicted criminals.
Australia’s status as a ‘client state’ undermines Australia democracy and disempowers its citizens. We are embedded in the Fascist US Neo-cons US hegemony politically, militarily and economically.
Australia: A Client State
http://www.amazon.com/Australia-Client-State-Pelican-books/dp/0140224467/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1428983378&sr=1- 2&keywords=australia+a+client+state
Commonwealth of Australia – The Concealed Colony https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY2k_f11lxI
Australia the Concealed Colony ttp://basic-fraud.com/
Australia the Concealed Colony http://loveforlife.com.au/content/08/08/13/australia-concealed-colony-464-x-a4-page-pdf-file Australia’s Illegal and Invalid Constitution http://www.harold-holt.net/Australian-Constitution-is-illegal-and-invalid.html
Australia’s constitution vests the power of decision making with the Queen, in conference with the Governor-General. It is generally accepted that the Governor-General acts on the advice of the Prime Minister and the Federal Executive Council, comprised of all ministers and parliamentary secretaries.
This applies to decision making “for the execution and maintenance” of the Constitution and the laws of the Commonwealth, otherwise known as the “executive power” provision.
Question: Where is Australia’s national sovereignty if Australia has to consult the Queen?
Question: If a proposed law has to be presented from the Governor‐General for the Queen’s assent…Where is our national sovereignty?
The extent to which the executive government can legally exercise its powers independent of Parliament continues to be the subject of significant debate. In relation to decisions about the military, it is generally acknowledged that the government has the power to declare war and deploy troops overseas, because of the executive power provision. The executive government’s power can be limited or regulated by Parliament, in certain areas which are set out in the Constitution under the “legislative powers” provision. Legal experts have suggested Parliament may have the right to limit the executive’s decision making capability for areas such as defence, because Parliament is specifically given the power to make laws with respect to the “naval and military defence of the Commonwealth… and the control of the forces”.
Question: Then why are they not acting and there is never any declaration of war?
https://www.aph.gov.au/binaries/library/pubs/bn/pol/parliamentaryinvolvement.pdf Parliamentary involvement in declaring war and deploying forces overseas
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=278 Sending troops into conflict must be a decision for Parliament, not the PM
Remedies for Democratic Solutions if Implemented
Below is one of several positive remedies according to the Constitution, however the electorate has to educate themselves to what is truly democratic as compared to the facade of democracy that we are presently under. All of us need to understand the principles that were ‘supposed’ to be in place for a democracy. We have not been vigilant and we have all been dumbed down or forgotten the basic principles of due process. For those who want to get rid of the fictional myths of corporations and get back into reality the proposed information I came across looks the most promising! It depends if you want to stand under a criminal corporate system or do you want to change this system into a better one like the Founding Fathers envisaged…
A ‘Recall system’ needs to be installed to throw out those corrupt politicians who do not represent “We the people.” The People’s Referendum needs to be installed to vote on matters of the country for the benefit of Australia and its existing citizens instead of for and on behalf of the political parties and any foreign country who uses Australia as a docile and subservient ‘client state’. We perhaps need to establish the instrument of a ‘Grand Jury’.
Australia needs to develop her own national sovereignty and we need to understand which ‘federalist model’ is best suited to re-establish democracy and due process instead of government over-reach, government domination in which Australia now operates under government tyranny and most people do not realise this.
Judicial review is nothing more than the judiciary expanding of its powers that it ought not to have. It is called a number of things like judiciary despotism or judicial tyranny and it needs to be halted if you want to continue to live in a democratic country were at present it is a mere skeleton and looks nothing like democracy at work. It is executive edicts with no over sight with its checks and balances. The ‘original’ democratic system has been changed right in front of everyone’s eye’s of the decades and we are being ruled not governed by
the inside as well as outside by Corporatism or Fascism which is undemocratic, it is not democratic by any means or definition. Governments have veered way off the track…and are getting away with it with no dissension from the public. Now we have Corporations masquerading as governments.
It’s time to give the federation a makeover http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-10-27/moran-we-must-act-to-save-our- federation/5843822
Examples of Federalism
http://australianpolitics.com/democracy-and-politics/key-terms/federalism https://apgovernmentchs.wikispaces.com/Types+of+Federalism?responseToken=f3653019134b1639be6d283e7a98afdb http://www.sparknotes.com/us-government-and-politics/american-government/federalism/section2.rhtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalism
On January 1, 1901 the Australian nation emerged as a federation. The Australian continent was colonized by theUnited Kingdom in 1788, which subsequently established six self-governing colonies there. In the 1890s the governments of these colonies all held referendums on becoming a unified, self-governing “Commonwealth” within the British Empire. When all the colonies voted in favour of federation, the Federation of Australia commenced, resulting in the establishment of the Commonwealth of Australia in 1901. The model of Australian federalism adheres closely to the original model of the United States of America, though through a Westminster system.
Australian Federalism http://australianpolitics.com/constitution-aus/federalism (Judicial Review has been at work here) In practice, the powers of the federal government
have been expanded through decisions of the High Court.
What Separation of Powers Means for Constitutional Government
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2007/12/what-separation-of-powers-means-for-constitutional-government
What is wrong with an elective dictatorship? Australian http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Research_and_Education/hamer/chap11
Australian Federalism
http://australianpolitics.com/democracy-and-politics/key-terms/federalism (Judicial Review)
Decisions of the High Court extending and consolidating Commonwealth power. Through decisions such as those in the Engineers Case in 1920, the Tasmanian Dams Case of 1983, and others, there has been a steady transfer of power to the central government.
Constitutional Critique Australian http://blogs.usyd.edu.au/cru/
The Conversation Australian https://theconversation.com/profiles/anne-twomey-6072
The States, the Commonwealth and the Crown–the Battle for Sovereignty
http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/~/~/link.aspx?_id=76D508CC96314F19A371171C7A270930&_z=z
Role of the Governor
(One of our group commented on this document)
The Governor of Victoria is appointed by the Queen, on the advice of the Premier, to act as her representative as Head of State in Victoria. Since the Australia Acts of 1986, it is the Governor, and not the Queen, who exercises all the powers of the Head of State, and he or she is not subject to the direction or supervision of the Monarch. Upon appointment, he becomes a Viceroy. The Governor’s main responsibilities fall into three categories; constitutional, ceremonial and community engagement
This statement is patently wrong and treacherous
Firstly it does not mention which queen it is referring to, whether it is the Queen of England and the UK or the Queen of Australia or some artificial corporate queen as registered with ASIC (see attached)
In any case, the assumption of the Governor of Victoria as being authorised under the Australia Act is wrong
The Australia Act only applies if at all to the Governor General as representative of the Queen of Australia ( whoever that is)
The Governor General cannot and is not authorised to assign any powers to the governors of the States because the states fall under a different authority and the Governor General’s authority is strictly restricted to the Queen of Australia ( not the Queen of England and the UK )
Secondly, The Australia Act is void because it was not given proper lawful assent by the States nor had the states such as Western Australia and Queensland held a referendum as per their own constitution prescribed in order to be included under the Australia Act or to have their constitution altered as the Australia Act purports to do.
So anything relying on the Australia act or enacted after or as a result of the Australia Act 1986 is invalid as is the Supreme Court Act 1986
The Australia Act falsely purports to amend the constitution of Western Australia as follows: 14 Amendment of Constitution Act of Western Australia
(1) The Constitution Act 1889 of the State of Western Australia is in this section referred to as the Principal Act. (2) Section 50 of the Principal Act is amended in subsection (3):
(a) by omitting from paragraph (a): (i) “and Signet”; and
(ii) “constituted under Letters Patent under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom”;
(b) by omitting from paragraph (b): (i) “and Signet”; and
(ii) “whenever and so long as the office of Governor is vacant or the Governor is incapable of discharging the duties of administration or has departed
from Western Australia”; and (c) by omitting from paragraph (c):
(i) “under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom”; and
(ii) “during a temporary absence of the Governor for a short period from the seat of Government or from the
State”.
(3) Section 51 of the Principal Act is amended:
(a) by omitting subsection (1); and (b) by omitting from subsection (2):
(i) “(2)”;
(ii) “this section and in”; and
(iii) “and the expression ‘Signet’ means the seal commonly used for the sign manual of the Sovereign or the seal with which documents are sealed by
the Secretary of State in the United Kingdom on behalf of the Sovereign”.
This cannot be done without a referendum of the electors of WA
The relevant points in the Western Australian Constitution of 1889 are:
under Miscellaneus section 73 of theAct and
(g) the Bill has also prior to such presentation been approved by the electors in accordance with this section,
and a Bill assented to consequent upon its presentation in contravention of this subsection shall be of no effect as an Act.
(3) On a day fixed by the Governor by Order in Council, being a day not sooner than 2 months, and not later than 6 months, after the passage through the Legislative Council and the Legislative Assembly of a Bill of a kind referred to in subsection (2), the question for the approval or otherwise of the Bill shall be submitted to the electors qualified to vote for the election of members of the Legislative Assembly according to the provisions of the Electoral Act 1907.
(4) When the Bill is submitted to the electors the vote shall be taken in such manner as is fixed by law.
(5) If a majority of the electors voting approve the Bill, it shall be presented to the Governor for assent by or in the name of
the Queen.
(6) Any person entitled to vote at a general election of members of the Legislative Assembly is entitled to bring proceedings in the Supreme Court for a
declaration, injunction or other remedy to enforce the provisions of this section either before or after a Bill of a kind referred to in subsection (2) is presented for assent by or in the name of the Queen.
COAG
Suggestion or Recommendation
Establish a state and federal Constitutional Council inside COAG to review laws and make sure they are constitutional. All future federal
legislation to be passed on to all states and territories before any federal binding legislation to make sure it is constitutional otherwise reject.
http://www.ag.gov.au/consultations/pages/COAGReviewofCounter-TerrorismLegislation.aspx
http://blogs.adelaide.edu.au/public-law-rc/2013/04/24/coag-failing-overburdened-and-dysfunctional-but-the-best-we-have/ http://blogs.adelaide.edu.au/public-law-rc/2012/08/02/ritualistic-masochism-or-necessary-evil-coag-and-australian-federalism/
http://www.gtcentre.unsw.edu.au/sites/gtcentre.unsw.edu.au/files/COAG.pdf
(This paper is not to be cited without the authors’ permission. Permission sought & granted)
Credits to the authors of COAG, THE CONSTITUTION AND STATE ACCOUNTABILITY
Originally presented at the 3rd annual Intergovernmental Relations Conference, National Convention Centre, Canberra, 17 August 2011 Professor Andrew Lynch at UNSW http://www.law.unsw.edu.au/profile/andrew-lynch
Paul Kildea Lecturer http://www.law.unsw.edu.au/profile/paul-kildea
Conclusion
The more significant the role played by 19 20 intergovernmental institutions, the less satisfactory it is that they enjoy only a precarious legal status. A marked disparity between the way in which power and responsibility is formally divided across the federation and the reality of intergovernmental practice is obviously undesirable. More worrying still is the diminished scope of parliamentary oversight and accountability to the people through their representatives to which informal executive-based arrangements may give rise. As we sought to show, these underlying concerns are starting to make themselves felt in the public statements by key players on the future operation and success of COAG, even though they may be more typically expressed as concerns about the ambition of its agenda after the 2008 IGA or the Commonwealth dominance of its processes.
Clearly, attending to the status and operation of COAG itself is becoming an important priority. But our consideration of the means available to do this, suggest that it may be less important to attempt entrenchment of any particular institutional structure than it is to better articulate in the Constitution the federal principles that underpin and sustain such bodies. Not only does the latter course preserve flexibility and ensure the dynamism of intergovernmental mechanisms, but it also has the benefit of popular democratic endorsement of specified federal values which may be used in judicial interpretation of the Constitution in determining the powers of respective governments and resolving disputes between them.
http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/publications.nsf/key/ManagerialFederalism-COAGandtheStates http://www.governmentnews.com.au/2008/12/coag-entrenchment-in-constitution-gallop/ (I am not in favour of this proposal) https://www.coag.gov.au/node/52
http://archive.coag.gov.au/mutual_recognition/legislation_rev/introduction.cfm
Select Committee on the Reform of the Australian Federation
https://www.pm.gov.au/media/2014-06-28/white-paper-reform-federation
PB
Correct! The evil Zionists are not Jews as such as they claim. There are the Jews who believe in Jesus Christ, there are Jews who don’t and are looking for a different messiah. There are Jews who have been protesting against the Zionists in Israel for decades.
The same thing is and has been happening on a much greater scale in the US with 9/11, with the release of Mossad agents posing as ‘art students’ and living in the Twin Towers, with the selling of body scanners in airports to place them in all hotels from the Las Vegas shootings, more armaments sent to Israel at American taxpayer expense, invading Kuwait, the Gulf wars etc etc etc.
https://israelcorruptsourcongress.blogspot.com/2015/02/congressional-policy-makers-with-dual.html
https://duckduckgo.com/?
q=Dual+US+and+Israeli+citizens+in+the+US+government&t=opera&ia=web
Las Vegas Shooting – Motive Exposed~
Books below after this one in Amazon
The Host and The Parasite: How Israel’s Fifth Column Consumed Americahttps://www.amazon.com/Host-Parasite-Israels-Consumed-America-ebook/dp/B00AEJ6L8C
Nemesis
Yes it takes a bit to get people to understand but it is right in front of us with all the smoke and mirrors. the politicians are corrupt seditious and traitors to Australia and the Australian Constitution.
President Trump was approached by high level military admirals and generals approximately 5 years before he was elected. I think he is trying to do the right thing but there are many things he needs to do and hasn’t yet done. Unless we get some of the same military elite here in Australia it will be business as usual with this corrupt criminal Australian system. After the Hilton bombing and the Port Arthur Massacre don’t hold your breath….
What is a worrying trend he is also surrounded by Zionists as his daughter is married to a Zionist banker as well. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Trump+surrounded+by+zionists&t=opera&ia=web
He is well known for keeping his enemies close
Nemesis likes to see Muslims mentioned equally so you better find one to park alongside Kushner in that article. He may have to make do with a Hindu now and again.
I’m glad you brought up President Kushner though. He’s sort of become the Martin Bormann of the Trump Camelot.
PB. I believe Arlyn has outlined the many faceted term that is known as Zionism, and that many who have evil in their hearts choose to hide behind that term, for people like you, whose nocturnal habit is to look under their bed, before turning in, just in case a Jew may be hiding under it.
As for your mentioning the Muslim, perhaps you should acquaint yourself with the historical and violent Islamic record, as well the rise of fundamental Islam in our own time before terming, what is basically a supremacist ideology dressed up as a religion, as being ‘downtrodden’.
As Winston Churchill noted in his memoirs – Mohammedism (Islam) is the most retrograde force on Earth.
And if you would like to educate yourself about Islam’s true intentions, then you could go no further than to visit this site, islammonitor.org which is now stored at the Australian National Library and to which I have added nine articles.
The choice is yours.
Arlyn, my understanding is that Trump has yet to deal with the ‘Deep State’ part of Israel that Netanyahu is currently fighting against. The move of the American Embassy to Jerusalem is, I believe, part of that plan. We must remember, that Israel was only ever recognized as a state due to Ben Gurion leaning on/blackmailing, Nelson Rockefeller and his involvement with Nazi Germany.
It was Rockefeller that turned the South American ‘NO’ vote against Israel as a state into a majority of ‘YES” votes at the Globalist Headquarters – United Nations.
Sometimes the ability to be able to blackmail your enemy, has many advantages.
Nemesis
The evil ultra right wing Zionists and the ultra right wing political party of the Likud are extremely dangerous and are a “clear” and present danger to Israel and to the world as a whole let alone the US Fascist Empire. They are national and international terrorists history has clearly shown. Their secret service of Mossad motto is “By way of deception thought shall make war”
The terrorism behind the so-called creation of the state of Israel is mis-founded in my humble opinion. It was nothing more than to invade, steal, murder, rape and occupy the lands of the Palestinians by the terrorists who know call themselves “Zionists”. The Balfour Declaration was the war pledge by Great Britain to Lord Rothschild were part and parcel for a ‘home’ not a nation which was vaguely worded and described. Obviously this was not misconstrued by those behind Zionism. The Zionists had other plans.
Apparently there have been some 12 attempts to assassinate President Trump. However I have heard on several Youtube commentators that he will deal with the Zionists last. Criminal charges have been brought against the war monger Netanyahu. Hopefully he will be gone soon.
Zionist Israel and terrorism
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Zioinsim+Israel+and+terrism&t=opera&ia=web
Zionist Israel a threat to the world
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Israel+a+threat+to+the+world&t=opera&ia=web
The Sampson Option
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Zionism+the+Sampson+option&t=opera&ia=web
They are insane megalomaniacs for their flawed theology in religion with their obsession with the ‘Greater Israel’
Dominion theologies perpetuated by the Jews who do not believe in Christ, by the Zionists and but the Roman Catholic Church-State to rule by force
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Dominion+theology&t=opera&ia=web
Christian Zionism is simply a false unbiblical man-made political ideology for their own devious agenda which is far far from the truth of biblical prophecy and biblical exegesis
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=christian+zionism&t=opera&ia=web
1917 Perfidious Albion: Britain’s broken promises: the Balfour Declaration and its impact on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict: what are our responsibilities today?
http://www.balfourproject.org/britains-broken-promises-the-balfour-declaration-1917-and-its-impact-on-the-israelipalestinian-conflict/
Earlier still, Lord Shaftesbury’s support for the Jewish restoration was influential in the development of Christian Zionism which wanted the Jews to return to the Holy Land in preparation for the Second coming of Christ. Even if his enthusiasm was permeated by Christian Zionist and political motives, Shaftesbury did represent a counter -current to anti-Semitism. But why did he and subsequent leaders ignore the Arabs already living in the land for centuries ? This is the crucial question that returns again and again in our book: A solution for a suffering people at the expense of the people already living in the land…..
James Renton discusses why the British Government issued the Balfour Declaration and what it hoped to achieve
https://jewishquarterly.org/2008/03/the-balfour-declaration-origins-and-consequences/
Arlyn, before I reply to your response here – could you inform me what you mean by right-wing and ultra right-wing?
Nemesis
To continue with the Sampson Option and 9/1 ie. suitcase or backpack nuclear mini-nukes or macro-nukes?
Too Classified to Publish, Part I — Russia Opens Files on Nuclear 9/11 and Israeli Proliferation
https://jamesfetzer.org/2019/03/too-classified-to-publish-part-i-russia-opens-files-on-nuclear-9-11-and-israeli-proliferation/
One key area is that the US had supplied Israel with surplus nuclear weapons.
We have a very solid confirmation on this. Back during the 1980s, Israel showed her inventory of Davy Crockett tactical nuclear warheads to one of our editors, who at the time was a senior NATO intelligence official. These early “micro-nukes” were taken out of the US inventory in 1978 and “disappeared.”
Too Classified to Publish
According to a retired FXX agent specializing in Israeli counter-intel: The type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era.
Chemical analysis done by DOE Sandia was able to identify the chemical/radiation footprint or fingerprint of the warheads based on samples taken after 911 of the fallout at ground zero. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use at ground zero is confirmed from multiple sources)
All plutonium-based warheads have a chemical fingerprint that can identify the type of design and where the PU was made and how old it is. This was the 911 blackmail on Bush 1 and 2, the illegal transfer of surplus US nuclear weapons to the Israelis, and why the continued cover up, along with the stolen gold and stock fraud that was happening on Wall Street, etc. According to file ENW57.pdf on page 66. (Editor’s note: Document received and confirmed)
Illegal distribution of US nuclear material to foreign allies was not limited to Israel. Virtually all NATO allies were in on this scam too. Dick Cheney was the bad guy on this one. Bush2/Cheney traded nuclear pits to foreign countries as IOU’s in order to get what they wanted. Tom Countryman, a well-known Israeli operative, is curiously now in charge of N.N.P. at the State Department under Obama.(?) He was put there by Rahm Emanuel.
It appears that the weapon of choice for the Israelis was the W-54 and follow on series of nuclear pits taken from the Amarillo, Texas, storage dump. This was what Carnaby was working on for Bush senior in Houston. A total of over 350 pits were transferred to the Israelis over a 10 to 20 year period of time. The W-54 type of pit design was the most desirable, due to the 2-point implosion pit design. This is the easiest to re manufacture and modify as compared to other circular pit designs.
The pill-shaped design of the W-54 type weapon contains over 1.5 times more plutonium than a standard pit. This would allow enough Plutonium to be recovered that was still of weapons grade use, even after 32 plus years of age. Americium build-up in the pit over time eventually makes the pit unusable as a weapon, so they have a limited shelf life based on how fast or slow the Plutonium was produced in the reactor at Stanford. Usually it was about 150 days max. Irradiation time in the reactor during production determines the shelf-life of the pit as weapons grade material. All of the micro nukes used by the Israelis are re-manufactured W-54 type series devices.
These devices were used in the Bali bombing and the London bombing and in Japan on their reactors. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use in Bali confirmed) Also used in Damascus, Iraq and Afghanistan by the US. (Editor’s note: Multiple confirmation including site samples.)
9/11 WTC Nuclear Demolition – North Tower PULVERIZED
Dimitri Khalezov
WTC Nuclear Demolition – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cfIU…
a groundbreaking interview of an ex officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence
exposing the truth of the 9/11 events This Video series has been censored all through the web.
Why I believe nuclear demolition fits all the evidence we know about.
They didn’t call it “ground zero” for nothing! Before 911, ground zero only meant the area below or above a nuclear detonation, after 911, they changed some of the dictionaries to say it was also the place where terrorists attacked the trade centers. It’s all mind control.
Dimitri Khalezov has been an expert in nuclear demolition for many years and has an incredible amount of proof that the buildings were taken down by underground micro nuclear demolition charges! I’ve posted some links to other material such as the melted cars that could have only been done by EMP type effects caused by a nuclear bomb since there was no jet fuel burning at ground Illegal distribution of US nuclear material to foreign allies was not limited to Israel. Virtually all NATO allies were in on this scam too. Dick Cheney was the bad guy on this one. Bush2/Cheney traded nuclear pits to foreign countries as IOU’s in order to get what they wanted. Tom Countryman, a well-known Israeli operative, is curiously now in charge of N.N.P. at the State Department under Obama.(?) He was put there by Rahm Emanuel.
It appears that the weapon of choice for the Israelis was the W-54 and follow on series of nuclear pits taken from the Amarillo, Texas, storage dump. This was what Carnaby was working on for Bush senior in Houston. A total of over 350 pits were transferred to the Israelis over a 10 to 20 year period of time. The W-54 type of pit design was the most desirable, due to the 2-point implosion pit design. This is the easiest to re manufacture and modify as compared to other circular pit designs.
The pill-shaped design of the W-54 type weapon contains over 1.5 times more plutonium than a standard pit. This would allow enough Plutonium to be recovered that was still of weapons grade use, even after 32 plus years of age. Americium build-up in the pit over time eventually makes the pit unusable as a weapon, so they have a limited shelf life based on how fast or slow the Plutonium was produced in the reactor at Stanford. Usually it was about 150 days max. Irradiation time in the reactor during production determines the shelf-life of the pit as weapons grade material. All of the micro nukes used by the Israelis are re-manufactured W-54 type series devices.
These devices were used in the Bali bombing and the London bombing and in Japan on their reactors. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use in Bali confirmed) Also used in Damascus, Iraq and Afghanistan by the US. (Editor’s note: Multiple confirmation including site samples.) AND some of these cars were missing engine blocks! They were totally melted! How do you melt an engine block when no fire was burning at ground level – many of these cars were 7 blocks away! They were never explained in any way. Also it was never explained why Tritium levels were 55 times more than normal at ground zero. And of course we have ALL the strange cancers from first responders and many of them have died. They were forced to wear “air quality” badges which Dimitri says were really just radiation detectors in disguise so they could monitor everybody’s exposure and pull people out of the hot zones for a while when their badges reported higher radiation. Easy to lie to everybody and tell them the badge is to monitor air quality. That is pure garbage if you think about it. There is not going to be that much difference in “air quality around such a relatively small area anyway.
Dimitri even said that in the 70’s he was told that the Americans had authorized the twin towers to be taken down at the end of their lifetimes with small nuclear demolition charges! I did some research and it was true! It was determined that only a nuclear demolition charge could safely bring down both Towers and Building 7 because of their construction. Here’s some good information on nuclear demolition
http://www.911thology.com/
Illegal distribution of US nuclear material to foreign allies was not limited to Israel. Virtually all NATO allies were in on this scam too. Dick Cheney was the bad guy on this one. Bush2/Cheney traded nuclear pits to foreign countries as IOU’s in order to get what they wanted. Tom Countryman, a well-known Israeli operative, is curiously now in charge of N.N.P. at the State Department under Obama.(?) He was put there by Rahm Emanuel.
It appears that the weapon of choice for the Israelis was the W-54 and follow on series of nuclear pits taken from the Amarillo, Texas, storage dump. This was what Carnaby was working on for Bush senior in Houston. A total of over 350 pits were transferred to the Israelis over a 10 to 20 year period of time. The W-54 type of pit design was the most desirable, due to the 2-point implosion pit design. This is the easiest to re manufacture and modify as compared to other circular pit designs.
The pill-shaped design of the W-54 type weapon contains over 1.5 times more plutonium than a standard pit. This would allow enough Plutonium to be recovered that was still of weapons grade use, even after 32 plus years of age. Americium build-up in the pit over time eventually makes the pit unusable as a weapon, so they have a limited shelf life based on how fast or slow the Plutonium was produced in the reactor at Stanford. Usually it was about 150 days max. Irradiation time in the reactor during production determines the shelf-life of the pit as weapons grade material. All of the micro nukes used by the Israelis are re-manufactured W-54 type series devices.
These devices were used in the Bali bombing and the London bombing and in Japan on their reactors. (Editor’s note: Nuclear weapon use in Bali confirmed) Also used in Damascus, Iraq and Afghanistan by the US. (Editor’s note: Multiple confirmation including site samples.)
These are stored in most Israeli embassies for ease of deployment. The ones used on 9-11 were kept at the Israeli consulate in NYC until put in place. After 9-11, the FBI now checks all diplomatic pouches with a Geiger counter before entering or leaving the US. The South African weapons were also surplus W-54 artillery shells acquired from Israeli; and final assembly and testing was done in South Africa with Israel assistance. (Editor’s note: This explains Pelandaba production issues.)
Nukes and 9/11
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_170.htm
There are only two events known to cause ground-hugging pyroclastic flows (pictured below):
A volcanic eruption
A thermo nuclear detonation
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=9%2F11+nuclkaea+bomv%3D%5Db+in+the+foundation+images&t=opera&ia=images&iax=images&iai=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F-GJeUPmHOR0E%2FVeAqubuYO5I%2FAAAAAAAAZoA%2FyXdOlqImn9M%2Fs1600%2F03%252BSmoothed%252Bgranite%252Bfrom%252Bthermo-nuclear%252Bdetonation%252Bin%252Bthe%252BWTC%252Bfoundation.jpg
How Mini-nukes were used to Destroy the WTC and the untold story of 9/11 https://www.slideserve.com/fleta/how-mini-nukes-were-used-to-destroy-the-wtc-and-the-untold-story-of-9-11
Why is Israel Controlling 9/11 “Troof?”
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2018/07/01/why-is-israel-controlling-9-11-troof/
https://www.intellihub.com/use-micro-nukes-takedown-wtc-complex-911-different-eyes/
There is also the fact that the debris field was substantially low for the magnitude of buildings that were destroyed, thus signifying that most of the debris was incinerated upon the demo blast.
Massive craters under the WTC complex were formed, likely from the detonation of micro-nukes, as the rock was even melted smooth. Later after the site was fairly cleaned up and the craters were excavated, the city of New York continued to wash down the cavities with hoses daily for years as traces of Tritium were found, signifying the use of nuclear weaponry. Evidence shows that levels of Tritium were 55 times higher than normal in the WTC debris. Tritium is a by-product of a nuclear blast.
The fact that the WTC buildings were pulverized into a fine dust, 20 microns in size or less, cannot be ignored. This is a tell-tale sign of a high energy release typical of a nuclear explosion. Eyewitness accounts and personal testimony indicate that people were thrown an entire city block from what was described as a warm wind just as the towers begin to collapse.
There were also multiple reports of “hanging skin” or “melted skin” on victims around ground zero. This was a common occurrence in the Hiroshima blast.
Major hot spots were reported in and around the debris for up to six months after 9/11.
This is commonly referred to as “China Syndrome”, where nuclear material will continue to undergo fission for a period of time, generating massive heat plumes.
To no surprise, videos obtained via Freedom of Information ACT (FOIA) requests show that sections of the video and audio have been removed, especially during the beginning of the collapse of the towers. Why would the government need to remove these sections of the video?
Who do you think John is talking about?
Revelation 3:9 King James Version (KJV)
9 Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie…..
Arlyn, I think that we should take a step back here and look at the bigger picture that you present:
We need to take on board, that when discussing the covert and at times, overt activities by Nation State agencies, such as Mossad, CIA, MI6 and even our own ASIO, that generalizations concerning the country of origin of those agents, have a tendency to paint the whole nation as somehow being involved in those activities.
We should outline, as a concern to isolate those agencies that answer to the Globalist/Cabal, and not to the nation states that the agencies now in play, and administered by our corrupt governments, no longer represent the very country or its laws and culture that provides them with the means with what they take upon themselves to put in motion, world wide, and that Trump is currently combating.
The greater proportion of the population of any Western country today is still totally clueless as to how their government is now being used against them, and whose treachery employs its own agencies via illegal laws that contradict their own law of the land, and has been imposed on them by the United Nations under the many treaties that our politicians have betrayed us all, by signing onto without any input whatsoever from the native population.
Your understanding of the current situation world wide I have not argument with, but we must remember, that not everyone is as clued up with current and past events, as we would wish to hope for.
Respectfully I have been researching topics and issues for some 35 years and ‘stepping back’ is certainly not in my character. I guess some people need to do that but others come in more closely. The world is in this mess because its citizens have not been vigilant in protecting their country or respective countries. I have been in the fortunate position to have an open mind and Im an avid reader as I have acquired books for my own private library of some 4,000. I have always been patriot to he country that I reside in. I can’t stand the jingoism that we had under ex PM Howard. National sovereignty of Australia needs to be protected far more than what it is. The whole political system is rigged and undemocratic as many of us know.
President Eisenhower warned the US and the world about it as did President Kennedy and there were others. I can’t think of any Australian who has done the same to warn Australia of impending danger which is most unfortunate.
President Eisenhower warns about the military industrial complex
President Kennedy warns of secret societies and secret proceedings
It is most unfortunate that citizens are so unaware of the colossal scale of this massive organised criminal syndicate that masquerades itself as ‘government’. All of the alphabet government intelligence agencies go back to the Vatican in their insidious megalomanical plan of worldwide domination of the sinister NWO with their NWReligion. There is $trillions of dollars the has been embezzled by the corrupt criminals posing in the US Government, the perpetual false flag wars that Australian is being led by the nose. We have unnecessary percentage of poverty in Australia that should not be as well as the homeless, we have corrupt politicians who are traitors to this country with their sedition and treason.
Those groups in the so-called intelligence services who were not a part of these awful crimes against humanity are just as guilty by remaining silent or helping those to obfuscate and hide the criminal perpetrators of this heinous crimes against civilians. Who did they take an Oath to?
We have sections of the police who are corrupt criminals
We have a corrupt BAR judicial system as they remained silent on many issues but particularly the Port Arthur Massacre with no trial for Martin Bryant and no coronial enquiry.
https://kangaroocourtofaustralia.com
We have corrupt corporations getting a free pass by fraudulent governments of both political parties for decades that has usurped Australia’s sovereignty and Australia’s Constitution
http://corpau.blogspot.com
https://realnewsaustralia.com/2016/04/24/1973-the-birth-of-corporate-australia/
Australia’s prostitue media and press are just Propagandists for the corporate -government sector as a apparatus tool to manufacture lies and to designate disinformation and misinformation to the public for their agendas coupled with a portion of Zionist media and press.
We have ex Federal judges calling for a national ASIC investigation into corporations which is being denied at the moment. Australia has no RICCO laws for racketeering unfortunately.
Are ‘we’ to step back with concerning the lies of 9/11 and accept the government lies without question? The Australian government has lied about many things as they lie for their US Fascist allies the Americans, the UK, the Zionist Israeli regime for a start. Are we to step back on the state sponsored terrorist act of the Hilton bombing in Sydney? Are we to step back on the Port Arthur Massacre that was a state sponsored terrorist act in which the Australian government and its agencies ASIO were part of Are we to step back with the poor Human Rights record by Australia? I could name a hundred things that we could step back from. What is the advantage of stepping back? I see nothing but disadvantages.
I say this again that Australia is a mere docile and subservient client state to those I have already mentioned previously It has been described as a Concealed Colony. It has not grown up like other nations have to get their independence. I has always required, needed or wanted a Protectorate but that comes at a great cost to the national sovereignty of Australia!
The Founding Fathers of America warned the new Republic about being vigilant. That is the responsibility of its citizens if we are going to think about We the People For the People by the people.That is the duty of the citizens and their obligation and responsibility to be vigilant for your country if you love your country and want to protect it. The longer people step back or don’t act, things just worsen much more than if they had dealt with it earlier.
It used too be a crime with the Athenians if they did not report a crime that was a criminal offence. How far we have slid backwards. The fabric of civility, justice, and due process depends on a country’s constitution to strictly adhere to it and severe penalties if breached for the Common Good of Australians not for them who break them repeatedly with impunity.
Arlyn, by stepping back we can also see the results of what we have learned encapsulated into a much bigger picture than what we first began with – that is what I meant by ‘stepping back’.
And when we can see that bigger picture, we then need to put what we can see into simple layman’s terms while avoiding generalizations that tend to impact on whole populations rather than zeroing in on those who must be exposed for the evil they do to us all.
Whole nations should never be included into the actions of the secret societies and non-state actors that make up the Globalist Cabal as it may cause confusion and unnecessary bigotry.
That is all I was trying to impress with you.