[Editor’s note: G5’s article on world totalitarianism by stealth.]
by G5
The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) of the United Nations is a cover for globalism.
The EU is an administratively parallel function. Run by the authority of the unaccountable, non-transparent Commissioners with an attached meaningless Parliament for horde distraction.
From Democracy to Deep State to Socialism to The UN-EU Model and no ordinary return after surrender.
The UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs has plans. They are termed The 17 Goals of Envision 2030.
Let me translate for you the Sustainable Development Goals — the SDGs:
1: End Poverty.
Translation: Centralized banks and a cashless world.
2: End Hunger.
Translation: GMOs.
3: Healthy Lives.
Translation: Mass Vaccination, Codex Alimentarius.
4: Equitable quality education.
Translation: Brainwashing through compulsory inculcation.
5: Empower all women.
Translation: Population control.
6: Management of water.
Translation: Privatise water.
7: Access to sustainable modern energy.
Translation: Smart Grid with Peak Pricing.
8: Sustainable economic growth.
Translation: Free trade zones for select corporate interests.
9: Resilient Infrastructure, Sustainable Industrialization, and Innovation.
Translation: Tolls, public transit, environmental restrictions.
10: Reduce Inequality.
Translation: More Regional Government.
11: Make cities inclusive, safe, and sustainable.
Translation: Big data surveillance state.
12: Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.
Translation: Forced austerity and bureaucratic manipulation. The EU is a practice.
13: Urgent action on Climate Change.
Translation: Taxes.
14: Conserve oceans, and marine resources.
Translation: Control oceans and minerals from ocean floors.
15: Protect, terrestrial ecosystems, manage forests.
Translation: Control resources and mineral rights.
16: Peaceful and inclusive societies.
Translation: UN Peacekeeping’ Missions, ICJ, fake refugee crises tensions, remove 2nd Amendment in US.
17: Sustainable Development.
Translation: Remove Sovereignty for Globalism under UN.
The Food Situation
The Codex Alimentarius Austriacus (which dates back to the Austria-Hungarian empire), is a set of standards related to food. Today it is maintained by a UN office called the Codex Alimentarius Commission, established in November 1961 by the Food and Agriculture organization and the World Health Organization.
The Commission (the CAC) first met in Rome in October, 1963.
It is recognized by The WTO as the dispute resolution authority concerning food safety and consumption protection.
In 2012, the CAC had 186 members plus an additional one for The EU. Note The EU also attends G meetings as a separate entity. One day The EU Members decided not to attend. Therefore, The EU becomes the de jure superstate.
In 2015 there were 215 ‘Observers’ in the Commission which is how it starts. These were 49 Inter-government Organizations, 150 Non-Government Organizations, and 16 other UN Organizations.
It manages ALL food; processed, semi-processed, and raw, plus Food Labeling, Hygiene, Additives, Pesticides, Residues, Processing, Safety, Biotechnology, Management, Government Import and Export Inspections and Certifications, with Mandatory Standards including Vitamin and Mineral Supplements
In 1996 it was proposed that no herb, vitamin or mineral be sold as therapeutic, and supplements be reclassified. The measures adopted in 2005 becoming the Global Safety Guidelines. Supplements were further classified as pharmaceuticals.
In 2004, the EU centralist puppet adopted The CAC into its Food Supplements Directive.
“The is a group of health activists, called The Manifesto on the Future of Food states. It says that bureaucracies such as WTO, WB, IMF, and CAC, serve the interests of global agribusiness and undermine farmers and consumers.
It’s world totalitarianism by stealth and fake morality.
Now who would have thought.
Bewdy, G5. That’s quite the new Oxford English Dictionary you’ve got there. My faves are Numbers 4, 6, and 16.
Re Number 15, humans so far seem unwilling to use their natural equipment to fight off attacks on ecosystems by their conspecifics. But who’s to say that other species won’t come to the fore?
Go insects! Go rats! Go snakes! Go hyenas and moose! You show ’em!
In line 4 G5 spells ‘Commissars” wrong.
Very funny, Justin.
“Green tyranny” is spoken of in Vaclav Klaus’s book “Blue Planet and Green Shackles,” qv.
Human Resources
Formerly known as Special High Intensity Training
Multiculturalism
Transitory. Results in monoculture.
Feminism:
You can’t make women more feminine, but there’s plenty of men out there
Racist:
What one person losing an argument calls another
Freemasonry
The practice of getting its members to construct a worldwide prison for themselves and non members
Communism
Renamed from Bolshevism (true story)
Progressives
People who want socialism, and then will want communism
Islam
Any religion that claims it is the religion of peace is no religion of peace at all
Islamophobia
Making a genuine fear look irrational and baseless
Gender-fluid
Must be changed regularly
Immigrants
Gimmegrants
Barack Obama
“I am a liberal Jew” go on, google it.
And the long-term effect of focusing on such deceits in isolation from the bigger picture ?
Because of the hypocrisy of all these movements that are created to divide us. There’s plenty to talk about just there. And, yes, there is a bigger picture, as they are related (driven by The Cabal, whoever might be in charge). Joe average might not care about who rules him, so long as he can lead a reasonably happy life. It might be better to show how he is being herded by what he sees everyday, and making him ask questions about it.
How about immigration? How smart is it that we have immigration from highly patriarchal cultures such as Africa or Islamic nations into a nation that supposes itself to be equal opportunity?
Or the difference of cultures that ‘Live fast, die young’ like Africans, into a country where people must plan ahead, such as northern european countries?
Where is the discussion on how muslims might view the debauchery that western civilization is falling into?
Or for that matter, the immigration of people from cultures that exist on racial lines coming into a ‘multicultural’ nation?
What do aboriginals say about the continual intake of migrants into this country? Did Kevin Rudd not apologize to the aboriginals when he was prime minister?
What about the immigration of refugees from countrys ruled by a tinpot dictatorship? Why are we encouraging the displacement of people from their homelands? Who helped Europeans when they were under the thumb of the spanish inquisition?
Why are we not concerned about the increase of sectarian violence that a big australia will experience in the coming decade?
What about the disintegration of the community involvement with the increase of diverse populations?
What are the long term effects of ignoring this, because I haven’t seen any answers to these questions on immigration, let alone people asking these questions.
The point I was trying to make is that, as euphemisms always signify an uneasiness about the corresponding subject, we should take heart that those concerned are far from invincible.
The way that the words “moderate” and “radical” are applied to Islam also heralds a squeamish disconnect from the real World: “Radical” means nothing more than rooted, so as far as any religion goes those who don’t fit said bill are simply fakers. Calling any belief system “moderate” is just absurd nonsense.
Senator Malcolm Roberts says there is no climate change. Sky News interviewer interrupts him continually. Pathetic attempt. Senator Roberts cleans him up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmZsSV_k8vs
https://www.washingtonpost.com
Article from Washington Post link above
Antartica just hit 65 degrees its warmest temperature ever recorded.
https://principia-scientific.org/nasa-exposed-in-massive-new-climate-data-fraud/
https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22841-what-s-the-real-agenda-behind-climate-change-alarmism
https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/300-scientists-blast-noaa-fudging-climate-change-data/
https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/28349-does-noaa-alter-temperature-data-to-fit-global-warming-agenda
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/the-stunning-statistical-fraud-behind-the-global-warming-scare/
https://trueconservativepundit.com/2019/07/24/proof-that-nasa-is-manipulating-global-temperature-data-to-push-the-false-global-warming-narrative/
As climate data fraud has become so prevalent I sure wouldn’t be taking it on board;
https://principia-scientific.org/nasa-exposed-in-massive-new-climate-data-fraud/
https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22841-what-s-the-real-agenda-behind-climate-change-alarmism
https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/300-scientists-blast-noaa-fudging-climate-change-data/
https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/28349-does-noaa-alter-temperature-data-to-fit-global-warming-agenda
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/the-stunning-statistical-fraud-behind-the-global-warming-scare/
https://trueconservativepundit.com/2019/07/24/proof-that-nasa-is-manipulating-global-temperature-data-to-push-the-false-global-warming-narrative/
The nebulous term ‘climate change’ is like the term ‘war on terror’. At what point will we say “We did it! We solved climate change”
or “We did it! We solved terrorism”
Hallo G5,
I have either an extension to points 1 and 10, or a separate point. Its name is “Proportionate Distribution of Wealth”. It sounds good. However, there are two types of “proportional” – directly proportional, if you have a lot, you get a lot, and inversely proportional – if you have a lot, you get a little. Guess which it will be.
Ivan
The very reverse of God’s judgement:
REF: Matthew 25:14–30
No guesses as to what sort of Spirit would be driving such a scheme
This website helps make it abundantly clear that the CLIMATE is CHANGEing, shows the science involved, and proves it is MAN MADE.
weathermodificationhistory.com