A Cock-Robin Approach to Judicial Kidnap – A Call For Your Ideas

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

Editor’s Note: A year and a half ago we ran an article called  The Port Arthur Edition of Who Killed Cock Robin. In it, Mary Maxwell compared a way of investigating 9-11 (based on Christopher Bollyn’s work) with a way of looking at Port Arthur massacre. Maxwell requests that I run part of it again today, to show its potential in relation to the Family Court issues.

On September 7, 2017 I attended a lecture by Christopher Bollyn and thus found out that it was he who wrote a manuscript that had been floating around the Internet with anonymous authorship.  Instead of asking “Who Hit the Twin Towers?”, Bollyn looked only at who had the capability and the access to do it, and also who had the wherewithal to produce a fabulous cover-up of such a huge public crime.

I turned his ideas into the questions like those asked in the nursery rhyme “Who Killed Cock Robin”.  It was then easy to transfer the structure to another famous event – “Port Arthur.”  I will print that below.

Today I am issuing an invitation to Protective parents or their advocates to see if it would be fruitful to use the same type of questions to get at the huge public crime that is occurring even as we speak, in the Family Court.

If you wish, make your suggestion in Comments below or email them to mclachlandee@gmail.com. Thank you!

The Who-Killed Cock Robin Approach to 9-11 and Port Arthur

Here are the original twelve questions about 9/11, and — in parentheses — my adaptation for Port Arthur:

A Dozen Questions

Who controlled entry to the premises on 9/11? (Who controlled the two sites: Broad Arrow Café and Seascape Cottage?)

Who created the weapons used in attacking the WTC? (Who brought in the guns for the shooting at PAHS — “Port Arthur Historic Site” — and what weapon was used to explode the BMW on the grass at Seascape, and burn the cottage next day?)

Who provided a distraction story about Arab hijackers? (Who gave us the legend of Martin Bryant’s involvement?)

Who destroyed the evidence, such as the WTC debris? (Who got rid of the gunman’s tray in the café, who got rid of the second Volvo?)

Who turned off all police and military alarms? (Who made sure local police were far away at 1.30pm, and who caused a six-hour delay in getting help for the tourists?)

Who controlled the media? (Who arranged the famous conference of international journalists to take place on April 28, 1996, and who ran the live press conferences?)

Who financed the attacks? Note: the cost of Port Arthur massacre was minimal, unlike 9/11, so I’ll substitute a question here: Who has been able, for 21 years, to prevent the innocent, imprisoned Martin Bryant, a classic patsy, from telling us what he really did that day?

Who handled the insurance aspects? (How did the victims get cheated out of ways to sue or get compensation?)

Who ran security at Boston and Newark airports? (Who handled the “security” of leaks, such as during the police negotiation with Bryant on the night of the massacre?)

Who wrote the official 9/11 report? (Who concocted the 1997 Port Arthur Seminar Papers?)

Who prevented lawsuits? (How was the wealthy Martin Bryant prevented from hiring his own attorney?)

A Few Things – How Simple It Is To Fool People!

The above dozen questions, pertaining to 9/11, suggest that you only need to know a few things to solve the mystery. Just do as Chris Bollyn did: identify who controlled key features:

the premises, the weapons, the cover story, the physical evidence, normal police alarms, media, the patsy, any insurance claims, “security” (as against leaks or unexpected interference), the official report, potential litigation, and the nation’s policy on terrorism.

The Port Arthur Answers to the 12 Questions

No need to read further if you are inspired to dash off and concoct some sort of parallel case regarding kidnap. For interested Aussies who missed the September 18, 2017 article at Gumshoe, or who wish to go over the Port Arthur details with an eye to the Cock Robin methodology, here is what was said. I am inviting people to find parallels with regard to judicial kidnap.

Who controlled the two sites: Seascape Cottage and the Broad Arrow Café?

First, regarding Seascape, I think the two owners of that cottage (a B&B), David and Sally Martin, were most likely killed, quietly, on the Saturday night, so they could not interfere on the Sunday operation. The official story is that Bryant shot them dead before noon on Sunday (and then casually drove off to do his shootout at Broad Arrow Café, which is in the Port Arthur Historic Site, the PAHS).

Evidence is clear that Bryant was not at Seascape until around 1pm. I think Sgt Mick Dyson was in the cottage all day. He was the most senior man in Tasmania on the Special Operations Group and yet was supposedly absent all day from all the action sites; we simply did not hear from him. Furthermore, he has never written about his April 28th work. I am guessing that he controlled the Seascape site, but got away before the arson next morning.

Second, regarding the café, Ian Kingston, an employee of PAHS, gave contradictory replies to questions about how a driver of a yellow Volvo parked outside the Café. This is not to say that Kingston “controlled the site.” I think there was ASIO control of the site. Hans Overbeeke, supposedly a tourist that day, took over the task of asking each tourist to provide name and address and he was solely in charge of the pay phone for contacting their families.

A black van is clearly seen on a video parked outside the café, and there has been no attempt to explain it. I assume it is a Commonwealth car. If so, we can say some members of the Australian government controlled the site that day. There is also a photo of Ari Ben Menashe standing on the steps of the Broad Arrow, for which no explanation has been given.  He is a self-admitted alumnus of Mossad. (He is also rumoured to be “Joe Vialls” who published inside dirt about the massacre.)

Who brought in the guns for the shooting at PAHS — “Port Arthur Historic Site” — and what weapon was used to explode the BMW on the grass at Seascape, and burn the cottage next day? At least one cop has said that Sgt Andrew Fogarty hurled a grenade at the BMW which was supposedly Bryant’s get-away vehicle. This caused the car to explode. It’s also reasonable to deduce that the same man, or a colleague, hurled grenades or similar to start the fire in Seascape the next morning. Firefighters were put on alert to attend, 30 minutes before any smoke was seen. How would anyone calculate that Martin Bryant was planning to “kill himself” by setting the cottage on fire? As for the multitude of guns reportedly unearthed at Seascape, Sally’s son denies that his parents owned them.

Who gave us the legend of Martin Bryant’s involvement? As recently as the 20th anniversary of the massacre, Channel 7’s TV host Mike Willesee gave us “details” of Bryant’s mental state, corroborated on the same TV show by Paul Mullen, MD. Mullen was never the doctor of Bryant but interviewed him in prison in order, apparently, to be able to write a report that Martin was fit to stand trial (rather than be declared insane).

During the immediate aftermath of the massacre, the highly concentrated mainstream media of Australia provided the whole story of how and why Bryant “did what he did.” For example, they said his motive was a grudge he held against Sally and David Martin for refusing to sell a farm to Bryant’s Dad years ago. Regarding a clearly photo-shopped picture of Martin’s “wild eyes,” editor Paul Kelly said it was not done intentionally.

Who got rid of the gunman’s tray in the café, who got rid of the second Volvo? When the gunman had lunch on the balcony of the café, he used a tray, which would have had his fingerprints. No mention was made of such a tray in the report of the day’s crimes. But later a cop leaked a “police training video” that showed the tray. Olga Scully found it. So who got rid of the tray? No one really needed to get rid of it as the public would never have known of its location until that video showed it sitting right near the famous sports bag that the real gunman had abandoned after the shooting.

Who got rid of the second Volvo? As all the world knows, Martin Bryant owned a yellow Volvo and strapped his surfboard on top of it. It seems that there were two yellow Volvos at PAHS that day. From memory I think Stuart Beattie indicated in his book that Lynn Beavis hid a yellow Volvo behind a building on the campus. He can’t know this but deduces it. Of course she has never been questioned, as no one was cross-examined in any courtroom regarding the PA massacre. Beattie tracked down a workman’s compensation paid to Lynn for her suffering that day, about $900,000. Her employer was Commonwealth Bank, perhaps a part of ASIO.

Who made sure local police were far away at 1.30pm, and who caused a six-hour delay in getting help for the tourists? Presumably the suspicious-looking fact that the only two local police had to go on a fool’s mission to make a drug bust was organized by someone who knows the police routine. The timing was such that the two cops were at a maximum distance from the PAHS when the shooting began at 1.30pm. As for who caused a delay, there were more than 100 cops who responded to the call but all of them (except two rookie female cops sent to the site) were held up at Taranna Devil Park. The chain of command is not complicated. It had to be the person in charge of Tasmanian police that day, Richard McCreadie, who decided when the cops would be allowed to go help the victims, namely at 7.30 that night.

Who arranged the famous conference of international journalists to take place on April 28, 1996, and who ran the live press conferences? I have never seen anything to tell us who set this conference up, but we can all figure that it took much advance planning. As for who ran live press conferences, it was Geoff Easton and Bob Fielding.

Who has been able, for 21 years, to prevent the innocent, imprisoned Martin Bryant, a classic patsy, from telling us what he really did that day? People cannot visit him, as they are turned away by prison officials saying “Martin does not want a visit from you.” It is claimed by Martin’s mother, Carleen Bryant, that John Avery pressured her to persuade her son to plead guilty, on the threat that if he didn’t, she and Lindy, Martin’s sister, would not be allowed to visit the prison. Can you imagine. The medical part of the prison has now been named the Wilf Lopez Center after a doctor there.

How did the victims get cheated out of ways to sue or get compensation? If the gunman be a lone nutter, the government does not have liability for those who get shot. Four of the victims could have escaped through the back door of the café, but a broken door lock prevented this. As these persons were employees of the PAHS, they could expect the door to be investigated as an issue of Occupational Health and Safety. However, despite demanding such an investigation, none was granted.

Who handled the “security” of leaks, such as during the police negotiation with Bryant on the night of the massacre? Sgt Terry McCarthy made sure not to ask pertinent questions of Bryant, such as “Who is in there with you?” “Who just fired that shot?” (The shots are referred to as “coughs’ on the tape of the interview.) Also, the bullets aimed near Constable Pat Allen’s ditch may have been a way to keep Pat from interfering in the Plan.

Who concocted the 1997 Port Arthur Seminar Papers? Joe Paul says they came about when federal and state officials agreed to meet north of Melbourne to discuss “lessons learned.”

How was the wealthy Martin Bryant prevented from hiring his own attorney? The Tasmanian Parliament passed a law that amended the asset-forfeiture procedure, to make it “legal” to seize Bryant’s fortune even before he was found guilty of the massacre.

Who, in Australia, felt that the time had come for restrictions on gun ownership? Internationally, George Soros was running a gun-control program. His servants in Australia appear to have been Tasmanian attorney Roland Browne, and Rebecca Peters. Barry Unsworth, ex-premier of NSW, had said in 1987 that a massacre in Tassie would be necessary to get the gun laws changed (cf 9/11: a new Pearl Harbor would be needed). John Howard had only been prime minister for six weeks in 1996 before the massacre happened. He quickly organized the half-billion-dollar buyback of guns from the public.

Conclusion

Researchers have found hundreds of anomalies concerning the 1996 event. No MSM media, no court, and no elected leader has ever been willing to address those issues. This is sufficient proof, in my opinion, that parliamentarians, the media, and the judiciary were thoroughly involved in the Port Arthur massacre and in its cover-up.

I point out that cover-up is a crime. I invite the cover-uppers to come out now and tell the truth in the hope that mercy will be shown to them in regard to their crime. I also urge bystanders, such as the nursing staff at Royal Hobart Hospital, to step forward and tell anything of interest.

Since there is no court or other government office willing to take information from such persons, I ask them to spill the beans to GumshoeNews. Or you can contact me via my website: www.MaxwellForSenate.com.

Back to Christopher Bollyn’s work. I think he has nailed 9/11. He simply exposes how men at all the key junctures that day had been palsie-walsie for decades. Personally, I now deem the 9/11 case closed.

I also declare the Port Arthur case closed, or as near as dammit. The police, working for shadowy persons in Canberra, did the 1996 massacre. Quite likely those shadowy persons are part of World Government.

All Aussies need to express their rejection of the official story — and post-haste, as time is running out. The Bryant family deserves a humble apology from all of us who too quickly believed the nonsensical “legend of Port Arthur.” We really ought to grow up, eh?

As for Martin Bryant, show him to the door.

Update, May 2019

I did not update any of the above, but here I update to say that there is no doubt we could use some of the same approach to the question: How are courts so easily able to grab a kid from the arms of its Protective parent and hand him/her over to a pedophile?

The situation is desperate. Any contribution you can make (not from your wallet but from your brain) will be greatly appreciated by those who are suffering.