Home Fam-Court An Insult to Every Adelaidean

An Insult to Every Adelaidean

23
(Photo – Mainstreet SA)

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

In England they tell Irish jokes.  In America they tell Polish jokes. (All the same jokes.) Years ago I heard that in Australia’s eastern states they tell Adelaide jokes.

I was not fazed when I heard this. I reckoned Sydneysiders and Melburnians think they are more sophisticated, but in fact the city on the Torrens is full of smarties.

And we have a non-congested CBD and lovely hinterland a mere 20 minutes drive away.

In 2013, I attended a lunch at the Commonwealth Club, when a visiting Canadian was the speaker.  She stated, without apology, that “Adelaide is the Edmonton of Australia.” My immediate thought was that Edmonton must be a great place. Maybe I’ll travel there one day and check it out.

Except for, Maybe, the Establishment

You realize I am going to hold forth on what has been Gumshoe’s the main theme for the last 5 months. The collaboration of the courts with “Whitehall.” And also with a band of baddies.

Oh, wait.  In some cases the court bloke is a dues-paying member of that band of baddies. I sort of doubt, however, that Whitehallers – police, social workers, etc – mix with the upper echelon. I mean the low echelon. Boy, this is confusing.

I will come back to the Adelaide business in a minute. Let me go on a tangent.

The other day I looked up an old Gumshoe article and the first two comments were by our ever-able-to-see-through-it-all colleages, Berry and Don W Reford. Behold:

(Don): Systematic abuse is all part of establishment’s need for perversion, whilst we take time to look at the latest revelations it diverts our attention to the greater harm of the establishment’s ongoing repressive ideology that becomes a normal process that we all have to endure without end, the destruction of our planet and violence against people in terms of physical and mental torture.

(Berry): Since when did locking up the “baddies” stop anyone from doing anything? The issue, as I see it, is that you’re either a resister or an enabler. If you’re prepared to acknowledge the pitfalls of an atomistic culture you’re simply not going to be putting your kids into anything resembling a conventional “school”. Problem solved.

I had never thought of Don’s idea before. Never occurred to me that the class distinctions, I mean the characteristics of the poor peeps, were designed. Geez! But Dr Day said something about maintaining the bedraggled.  If you can maintain their bedragledness, maybe you created it in the first place.

Dr Day Again

In 1969, a doctor who worked for Rockefeller’s Planned Parenthood gave a dinner speech to medical students and doctors. One doctor in the audience, Lawrence Dunegan, was pretty burnt up about it and finally in 1988 re-told it on Randy Engels radio show.  In the 2000s it appeared at rense.com under the title “The New Order of Barbarians.” Dee McLachlan and I printed it in full in our book Truth in Journalism (2015).

Here is the beginning of Dr Richard Days’s speech. It is verbatim Dunegan unless there are quote marks, then it is verbatim Day. Listen:

Most people don’t understand how governments operate and even people in high positions in governments don’t really understand how and where decisions are made.

4. People who really influence decisions are names that for the most part would be familiar to most of us, but he would not use individuals’ names — people of prominence who were primarily known in their private occupations. [!!!]

5. His purpose in telling our group about these changes that were to be brought about was to make it easier for us to adapt to these changes.

6. “Everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible purpose which will make it acceptable to people and second is the real purpose which would further the goals of establishing the new system.

OK, you get the flavor.  Day was saying some amazing things but all in a matter-of-fact tone. (The numbering is mine.)

Now for his remarks about the have-nots:

  1. “There will be some help available to [high school] students in handling stress, but the unfit won’t be able to make it. They will then move on to other things.” In this connection and later on with drug abuse and alcohol abuse he indicated that psychiatric services to help would be increased dramatically. Some would fall by the wayside and therefore were sort of dispensable ‘expendable.’
  1. [The increased availability of drugs would provide a sort of law of the jungle] whereby the weak and the unfit would be selected out. “But now we’ve become so civilized – we’re over civilized – and the unfit are enabled to survive only at the expense of those who are more fit.” The abuse of drugs would restore, in a certain sense, the law of the jungle and selection of the fittest for survival. News about drug abuse would also tend to reduce this unwarranted American complacency that the world is a safe place, and a nice place. [In other words, it was a safe place!]
  1. The same thing would happen with alcohol. Alcohol abuse would be both promoted and demoted at the same time. The vulnerable and the weak would respond to the promotions and therefore use and abuse more alcohol. Again, much more in the way of psychological services would be made available to help those who got hooked on drugs and alcohol.
  1. Buildings would be allowed to stand empty and deteriorate, and streets would be allowed to deteriorate in certain localities. The purpose of this was to provide the jungle, the depressed atmosphere for the unfit. [Jayz.]
  1. Other areas would be well maintained. Not every part of the city would be slums.
  1. Crime used to manage society. There would be the created slums and other areas well maintained. Those people able to leave the slums for better areas then would learn to better appreciate the importance of human accomplishment. This meant that if they left the jungle and came to civilization, so to speak, they could be proud of their own accomplishments that they made it. There was no related sympathy for those who were left behind in the jungle of drugs and deterioration.
  1. “We think we can effectively limit crime to the slum areas, so it won’t be spread heavily into better areas.” In the better areas, [we’d have] better coordinated police efforts. 62. There would be a whole new industry of residential security systems to develop with alarms and locks and alarms going into the police department so that people could protect their wealth and their wellbeing.

Back to Adelaide

Here is the insult to every Adelaidean, as advertised in the title of this article. The Gumshoe team – now including several protective parents, and others – has found out, the hard way, that government won’t budge on helping children who are being mistreated. The kids get stolen and you are supposed to put up with it.

Yours Truly did not know such a scheme was happening in South Australia, or anywhere. But now that I am revisiting Dr Day, I see the whole attitude makes sense.

What does not make sense to me is that so many professionals – such as lawyers, doctors, and academics — go along with it. I don’t mean the ones who are well and truly involved in trafficking kids, or for that matter, raping kids (though there are an astonishing contingent of them).

I mean those adults who are so star-struck – or whatever it is – by the power of the bosses (the mean old sh*tty bosses), that they voluntarily cooperate. For example, Dee is trying to get a child released from torture IN ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA in the Year of Our Lord TWENTY-NINETEEN. No matter how many office doors she knocks on, NO HUMAN BEING does the right thing.

I do not rule out that they have been to Dr Mesmer’s shop for regular tune-ups, though that is not a proven part of the routine. We at Gumshoe have emphasized money as the motive, or some sort of desire to belong. We have also tabled the idea that many of these adults were abused children.

Quo Usque Tandem Abutere Patientia Nostra?

What would Cicero say? “How long will you stretch our patience?” Why are we – say, the various protective parents – tolerating this.  How do the Upper Idiots think they can get away with it?

I am asking my fellow Adelaideans to please feel insulted. Feel insulted from the top of your head to the bottom of your feet. Feel revolted that anyone can do this to you – no matter whether they inherited it from Dr Day’s mob or some other damn-fool source. They can’t get away with it!

The whole thing is PREPOSTEROUS.

Get Sensible. Would You?

I’ll end this article with our Don Reford again:

“Systematic abuse is all part of establishment’s need for perversion, whilst we take time to look at the latest revelations it diverts our attention to the greater harm of the establishment’s ongoing repressive ideology that becomes a normal process that we all have to endure without end, the destruction of our planet and violence against people in terms of physical and mental torture.

And there you have it.

 

SHARE

23 COMMENTS

  1. A return to glorious Medieval Fuedalism, in which the powerful can use any lower person in any manner he or she sees fit.

    Actually, Day was wrong on one point; when the Rothschilds formed their formal alliance with the Rockefellers, every new strategy had to have three sub-objectives. For example, when it was decided that profitable access to the Caspian Basin required pipeline access to the Indian Ocean, not only was Pakistan and Afghanistan to be cleared of inconvenient populations and sovereignty; likewise the Slavic regions to the west; but the resultant refugees were to be assisted to invade and destablise western nations; and they were also intended to dilute demand for national sovereignty and cultural integrity and, therefore, become more compliant with internationalism (ie globalisation).

    Concomitant modifications to the education system ensured X and Y generations supported these developments… as we have seen in their vehement opposition to Brexit.

    Multiculturalism, refugee rights, political correctness, anti-parenting and the generational divide are all integral to this programme.

    Neat eh?

    • Neat eh!
      Yep and our poor brainless stupid self serving politicians, shock jokes and msms (with the ABC and SBS financed on borrowed money by us) are on with inane populist minority distractions.
      Either; none of them have a brain or are being suckered in ignorance to condemn their children and descendants to feudalistic banker’s debt slavery.
      They are all owned, financed by and indebted to the globalist corporate fascist hegemony.
      TRAITORS to those who died in so many wars to defend and protect Australia’s sovereignty.
      Yet they will turn out, as usual, on ANZAC day with platitudes and hypocricy, massaging their own egos and then going off to back stab the memory of what our soldiers died and suffered for.
      TRAITORS!

  2. Things are moving fast in US. Check above videos.

    May be the same changes will happen down-under shortly. Those that don’t follow events on the internet are ill-informed, but beware not everything on internet is real. Use your intelligence to work out what may be right and that which may not be right.

    But the above videos are food for thought.

    • Mal, excuse the cynic for noticing that the second video “Freedom Reigns – Mass Arrests FOR (sic) the cabal” is almost seven years old – pre-Q?. It doesn’t seem to have slowed their progress in Venezuela (for example).

      According to my intelligence that just might not be right.

      I watch and listen with open-minded interest but it seems that our (children’s) future is to be based on lies, perpetuated with riddles … Qué?

  3. With 3 million guest workers here and nearly 1 million new residents last year alone , the powers that are have decided to pull the pin by switching off the tap . I repeat , globalism is communism .
    In real terms , wages have not moved in forty years (and are on the decline) and the Australian dream has gone up one hundred fold . Now that the CCP can get cheaper bargains elsewhere , they’re job here is done .

    If only we had industry , like we had in the late sixties , we could all get back to manufacturing and producing everything we need here . Many problems solved .

    Thomas Jefferson
    “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency , first by inflation , then by deflation , the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered .”

  4. I’ve been all around the world and notwithstanding all Dr Day’s developments and the most expensive power in the world, Adelaide is my Goldilocks place. 15 minutes to work, 15 to the hills, 15 to the beach. Just right.
    Pity for us all that our government betrayed us in 1975 in favour of the UN/Bilderbergs in the Lima Declaration and shipped all our manafacturing off-shore. Pity the ABC has brainwashed my elderly mother to hate the patriarchy. Pity the country is being ruined by third world immigration.

  5. So, a few are drowsily rubbing the blinkers off their eyes and feign astonishment at the cesspit we have rushed into with our disregard of metaphysical realities (vicious Pride), love of money (facilitated by usurers), and lust for all things carnal (without regard for their proper purpose and use).

    I can’t go by and let our illustrious Tony Ryan get away with his fawning subservience to the establishment narrative that in “Medevial times” all men were virtual slaves to an “aristocracy” that was a law unto itself. If one would only check their facts, it would be discovered that Medieval Europe at the time was a place of flourishing art, archetecture, science and learning, and very general prosperity for all its citizens. It was the time when the Church had over 120 mandated Holy Days (where servile work was forbidden) and an ordinary working man could provide for his family in only about 75 working days. Usury was forbidden so there was not a plague of vampires sucking a significant portion out of every man’s due. It was also the time when the bishops drafted the Magna Carter and said “look here, Johnny-boy, sign here and acknowledge that your subjects are not your property to be disposed of according to your pleasure and convenience”.

    Not so now. The egomaniacal toadies and their usurious masters demand much more from their slaves than what the Egyptians ever demanded from their Hebrew slaves. Ordinarily, to maintain a healthy population of slaves the slaves need to spend about 2/3 of their time mantaining themselves… but last time I checked, many years ago, about 2/3 of an ordinary man’s potential income was siphoned off (via taxes and “interest”) to Gov’t and banks.

    Now, we get a bunch of people who try to ingratiate themselves with grand speeches about ‘A’orta do something! Well, I tell you now, I’ve been at this for a long time and there is no one who will be proposed as an election candidate or for any influential office who is not either a card-carrying member of the “elite” or a blackmailable toady.

    There’s much more but there’s a limit to what can be proposed in a comment to an article.

      • The booklet by Captain Ramsay should be read cover-to-cover, as should the book “From Admiral to Cabin Boy” (not a typo). Tells you how military leaders could not speak up in Britain on the verge of WWII or they would be jailed, as indeed these two were.

      • Thanks for the link, Julius. The (about half) that I have read up to now concurs directly to what I discovered almost 40 years ago.

        By the way, the “Mr” or “Dr” Fahey referred to by Ramsay was an Irish Priest, Fr Denis Fahey who is featured prominently in my library of way back then. He was a very quiet and private man somewhat lacking in “social charisma” but he was an astute researcher and was even summoned to Rome to advise and inform Pope Pius X (if my memory serves me accurately).

      • As borne out by the real purpose behind the Magna Carta:

        I’m not saying socialism is the answer but there are plenty of other misconceived ideas that are just dangerous

        • Yair, Berry, but I suggest that Fred Harrison and crew are but jaded ideologues pushing some neo-Marxist daydream.

          It’s no secret that the Magna Carta was chiefly directed at preserving the feudal landlords and their serfs from depredation by King and State; but the order of the time required a landlord to organise and coordinate village life for the benefit of all. Indeed, at that time it was well known and accepted that to defraud or deny the worker of his just reward was a crime (sin) that could incur the wrath of the Church on the offender regardless of his social rank. That the King could arbitrarily demand taxes and manpower for his own ambitions was an impost that drained the local economy to its detriment. Not saying the system was perfect but the principle enshrined is that kingship is not a license to pillage the people.

          In our day, of course, the ideological narcissists and their toadies who have practically complete control of the Gov’t and its instruments consider it their purpose to defraud and pillage the people of their property, culture, national identity etc. in the interests of a megalomaniac elite of usurers and ideologues who want to own and control the whole World in a dictatorship of a “New Order”.

          • Addendum.

            The ‘Masons have a motto “Ordo ab chao” which, in practice, translates to “create chaos then impose a (new) order” such is the tactic of all the “revolutions” that I know of.

            For all the “Yankophiles” out there their much loved dollar bill has the slogan “novus ordo seculorum” on it which means “new order of the World”.

          • A jaded ideologue pushing some neo-Marxist daydream ?

            I’d say you’re probably right, but let us not forget that, bar the threat of Communism, there wouldn’t have been any need for any Western government to establish a “social security” system, which means that a good percentage of us oldies would have been condemned to end our days in some wretched Brit-style workhouse, which Kinda brings the folly of the entire goody/baddy – friend/foe mindset into sharp perspective

          • Orrite, Berry, but in the natural order of human society it is not one of the functions of civil authority to provide “social security”. It is properly the duty of the family and extended family to honour and care for their aged antecedents on whose shoulders the society had been carried.

            However, since the oligarchy has been robbing the living daylights out of the society they like to rub more salt into the wound by making us oldies redundant and dependents of the State. Then, of course, as soon as is expedient (that is without creating a disturbance) you will be hospitalised and tranquilised with “palliative care” until you cannot even know if you’re hungry or thirsty and you die out of the way of “natural causes”. (Unless, of course, you can be diagnosed with cancer, in which case there’s a lot of people and institutions who can make a lot of money out of the “public purse’ by lingering your “treatment” for a long time).

            I guess that this conversation is veering way off topic. I leave it there.

  6. Look up Brother Nathanael on You Tube.
    He came from a Jewish family and became an Orthodox Monk.
    He does not pull any punches or make excuses.

    • I’m not sticking up for Judah as some sort of victim class,(nothing could be further from the truth)
      The point I was trying to make is that believing any sort breed is THE problem leaves you wide open to manipulation.

      All that anyone really needs to remember is that good and evil is likely to crop up in the most unlikely places

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.