Home Australia Australians “Woke, Whiny, Liberals”

Australians “Woke, Whiny, Liberals”

43

Jordan Jonas spent 77 days in the Canadian Arctic to win ALONE season 6

Introduction by DM

For your entertainment today two videos from Matt Walsh.

I haven’t laughed so hard for a long time.

Have you seen the show “ALONE”?

Alone is an televised survival competition series. It follows the self-documented daily struggles of 10 individuals as they survive alone in the wild for as long as possible using a limited equipment. They may “tap out” at any time, or be removed due to failing a medical check. The contestant who remains (survives) the longest wins a heap of cash. It’s worth a watch as you observe people survive 90 plus days alone in the harshest conditions.

Matt Walsh decided to watch the ALONE version in Australia, and his commentary is below in the first video. His conclusion after watching Australia’s ALONE version:

“How is Australia the weakest, wokest, lamest country on earth? How is that possible?”

Of course after his views were published he got a backlash from the Australian press.

His response is hilarious.

I have spoken of Australian politicians all belonging to the “yellow party” — that they are a bunch of cowards with an unwillingness to help children that have been traded, trafficked of abused by the systems of government and the courts.

Walsh comes up with his version of how to rescue Australia and make amends. His solution: “We need to invade Australia, for it’s own sake… based on what I’ve seen it will only take about 3 to 4 hours.” He suggests a reset down under.

SHARE

43 COMMENTS

  1. He is a bit sxtrene.
    Just send our policians, bureaucrats and mass media off to a inland reservation and it will be all solved.
    Pity he does not realise that we are just a decade behind the US.

    • I think you didn’t get all the sarcasm Ned… “that America solves all after it invades”

      A perfect comic performance

      • I got it, 💁🏼🤣🤣🤣but knew every one in the world would know……. Or they are stupid and it is a sad waste of time trying to fix stupid. Just look at some of the comments at gs.

  2. Brilliant Dee– I recently had a visitor a friend /a colleague from New Zealand stay a night with me— we worked in the desert for many years we had different world views but shared many values and amazing adventures and the camaraderie that comes from being women on life’s battlefield. It was a sort of making peace saying goodbye– for the good times.

    I tried not to “mention the war” but finished up sharing my research and the evidence I was submitting to support the Inquiry into Genocide — I also spoke of my being a survivor of torture and the experiments etc and how I have an invisible trauma related brain injury and my mind has developed alters.

    She was understandably overwhelmed but we reconnected and laughed a lot then she gave me some heartfelt advice she told me to get the submission in and then find some joy and laughter and find my place my people and the support I need.

    This coming from you Dee gave me much joy and laughter and so we never give up– so many songs come to mind and it is okay.

    Walsh is what my psychiatrist would term “astute” He calls me astute and I /”we” say we are a phenomena. It keeps everyone happy. Laughter is the best medicine.

    “We need to invade Australia, for it’s own sake… based on what I’ve seen it will only take about 3 to 4 hours.” He suggests a reset down under.

    “How is Australia the weakest, wokest, lamest country on earth? How is that possible?”

    Of course I know how that is possible –It was always the Grand Plan

  3. I noted at http://www.whatreallyhappened.com – new on 11/6 that there is a Australian Senate inquiry into the excess deaths in Australia.
    Some compromised bastard politicians have been preventing the inquiry, but now it is on.
    I have heard of only one short note in the msm….. Daily Telegraph.
    Some professor a few days ago claimed it on radio had nothing to do with the ‘vaccinations’. (2GB – Ray Hadley…. Part of the nine network mob, including the SMH) hardly a surprise from that mob.
    “The day will come when they cannot walk down the street’. ‘Q’.

    • E.B. BTW, WRH also has some more info on the Israeli killing of crewmen on the USS Liberty on 8th June 1967.
      Wonder if Walsh can make a joke on that?
      NEVER FORGET THE ACT OF WAR, THE KILLINGS AND THE COVER UPS.

  4. Square eyed Matt Walsh is a doofus who watches too much TV and previously thought all Australians were like Steve Irwin. He rates the “colonial boy” highly, who goes out huntin’ and shootin’ and trappin’, “opening up the country” as Major Mitchell would have it, with troops and wagons full of ammo. Daniel Boone and whatever from the 19th century. All good until it ended in tears at Gallipoli, you can see the trees on the roads around Ba’alarat, which all have names. ( Only two generations between Gallipoli and Zion, the usual two generational speed of the Globalists ).
    TV watching Matt Walsh has not realised that watching politically correct Australian dweebs getting lost in the bush is actually our version of “The Kardashians” and he should evaluate it on that basis. It exists to sell advertising !!!

  5. It should be remembered that most of the people putting themselves up for these types of shows or experiments are exhibitionists, seeking popularity and a quick financial benefit with very little talent of any kind. Have been losers all their lives because of their attitude to life so therefore they are going to fail.

    The worst part is that those losers then incur a bad reputation for the dinky-di ordinary people in our society. Why would you break down crying because you can’t cope with the situation you have put yourself in, when you have an pre-arranged escape?

  6. Mind you most Aussies do not have a better view of Americans, to which I can mostly agree. Many of our problems are because we have been brain washed to follow what-ever Americans do, we must follow. Like go to war against a country that is not a problem to us, or that we must have the Covid-19 jab to be good global citizens.

  7. Maybe you can share this with Matt Walsh.
    This is about Gina Chick she is the woman who won the Australian Alone Version.

    I think Matt is more aware and smarter than he is given credit for– in fact there is much for all to learn from Gina, her story is amazing.

    The Title: Force of Nature– I have made some comments


    Gina Chick’s -Australian Story

    “She feels like she has three people’s personalities squeezed into one body”
    Her “Origin” Story and family are important.
    She knows she is on the spectrum.
    Her Grandmother ahhh Force of Nature -Chairman Clift.
    A Human Experiment
    Overcoming adversity
    A profound philosophy
    Not rejecting the world
    Bringing life vitality into our life
    Being comfortable with the wilderness outside brings us to a place of peace with the wilderness inside.

    39,987 views Aug 28, 2023
    “A woman of the wild, a beacon of resilience, a force of nature. Gina Chick’s formidable skills and fearlessness captured the attention of the public when she spent 67 days alone in the Tasmanian wilderness and won the SBS series Alone Australia. Now the 53-year-old unlikely TV star shares how connecting with nature helped her through life’s darkest moments, including the devastating loss of her daughter, Blaise. Gina says that connecting with nature helps build the skills to live a more fulfilling life. And her message is striking a chord with the public. She now runs bush retreats for adults and children. Australian Story documents a mini Alone, a retreat where women spend days by themselves in the bush with water and bedding and nothing else but their thoughts. Watch our live Q and A event: Leigh Sales in Conversation with Gina Chick here: https://bit.ly/484FSUI Read more here: https://ab.co/45NCziy Subscribe: https://ab.co/3yqPOZ5

  8. OK, OK, true confession time from an undisclosed locatioin, possibly north of Hawaii…

    The other day I promised Diane that I would do an article to encourage Aussies to make a submision about genocide, the deadline coming up is July.

    But there were interruptions on my schedule and I also felt I don’t actually think that Australia fixing up its genocede law will help.

    I can put that in a wider context. I am in favor of massively revealing the hidden past of the Invaders’ treatment of indigenous folk in both my countries. “We screw everybody.” It has been a theme of my life that I take responsibility for what the US does.

    HOWEVER I don’t really feel that way anymore. I am not in the “we.” The people who decide what America does (such as sniping at Yemenis at the moment) are not me. They are not American. Their loyalty is (as far as I know) to their own group, the pathetic Elites. (Probably the same in Australia.)

    I don’t think I have ever made the slightest dent in policy, despite working on it more or less 24/7 since Hector was a pup. So if there is an enmity to be identified, it is not me-and-pals versus indigenous persons. It is the Elites killing all of us, over many generations, to whatever extent they have been able to pull it off.

    Diane, re the law of genocide. Ralph Lempkin, circa 1947, tried to get every nation to sign that treaty. The US did not sign, but lo and behold, around 1997 it had Congress make a domestic law, to criminalize it, using almost the exact words of the UN treaty. Little did I realize “they” did so because they saw the 1998 Rome Statute coming up “and ’tis better to say we can look out for our own genocidal criminals.”

    Oh yeah? Here’s my demand: enforce the law. Put someone on the gallows. Teach a lesson.

    Necessitas non habet legem.

    • I’ve considered that the so-called white hats and black hats are battling for global supremacy — but maybe both want depopulation

      • Dee – you may wish to also consider, that if both shades of hat had wanted total control over this world in their own right, we would already, as individuals, be fighting for survival?

        • T.O.
          I think that is right.
          If they (the BHs) were successful in 1916, the BHs would have achieved their goal.
          If the WHs were on the same team, why all NOW all the BS and delay?
          After 2020, the BHs should be in clover and we would not have all this BS.
          Someone is all BS. It is a serious chess game.

        • There are many faces to what is going on that not everyone is aware of, and mainly due to the many covert operations that is the hallmark of active military operations, and that many fail to appreciate.

          Too – not fully understood, is the reason for ‘Q’, which is a military intelligence operation, and put in place to garner support from the many civilians, and who are able to see the value of the information that ‘Q’ has divulged for nearly seven years.

          The ‘Q’ plan from the get go has been projecting to the observer all the bad actors, and what will eventuate in due course, sometimes four or more years into the future.

          The biggest sting operation in Human history is passing them by because they fail to dig deep enough into the information that has been provided, and/or, do not allow their thinking to expand past the perceptions, and knowledge they may have already gained, by not maintaining an open mind on everything, that they may hear, see or read.

          There is no place for personal biases if one wishes to comprehend the bigger picture of everything – especially of things to come.

  9. My email to Dee and Mary after forwarding the Media Release
    “Was wondering if you could feature an article on Gumshoe re Genocide Inquiry- calling on everyone to respond and maybe share what evidence they supplied.

    I am resubmitting my testimony focusing on Torture and Medical Experiments -Youth Detention at Dondale in NT as well as further evidence of Generational  Ritual Abuse Mind Control and Organised Abuse RAMCOA in Australia.

    In essence, there is a need to repeal the Attorney-General’s fiat (power of veto) in clauses 268.121 and 268.122 of the Criminal Code 1995  in order for Australia to have an operating law against Genocide, without the Attorney-General having the power to block any genocide cases from proceeding in Australia. COUNTRIES ARE NOT CONSIDERED CIVILISED IF THEY DO NOT HAVE A LAW AGAINST GENOCIDE.

    Media Release 7 June 2024
    “5 July deadline for submissions to Senate Genocide Inquiry
    Professor Ghillar, Michael Anderson, Convenor of the Sovereign Union, last surviving member of the founding four of the Aboriginal Embassy and Head of State of the Euahlayi Peoples Republic emphasises that the Criminal Code 1995 needs amending so that Australia finally has an operating law against Genocide. The 1948 Genocide convention states:

    Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

    (a) Killing members of the group,
    (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group,
    (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part,
    (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group,
    (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

    Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:
    (a) Genocide,
    (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide,
    (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide,
    (d) Attempt to commit genocide,
    (e) Complicity in genocide.
    In essence, there is a need to repeal the Attorney-General’s fiat (power of veto) in clauses 268.121 and 268.122 of the Criminal Code 1995 in order for Australia to have an operating law against Genocide, without the Attorney-General having the power to block any genocide cases from proceeding in Australia. Countries are not considered civilised if they do not have a law against genocide.

    On 31 May during Senate Estimates on Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation, Senator Lidia Thorpe asked questions relating to the Attorney-General’s fiat and to the Attorney-General’s Department response to her previous question on notice to which they answered that:

    “… the Australian government does not consider that genocide is occurring in Australia.” Lidia asked:

    “How do you come to the conclusion that there’s no genocide continuing in this country today? What is the basis of that information?”

    Mr Simon Newman, Deputy Secretary for the integrity and international Group, answered:

    “… We have not been given any advice in relation to that.”

    In February 2024 Senator Lidia Thorpe introduced to parliament a Private Senators Bill on Genocide named the Criminal Code Amendment (Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes) Bill 2024. She gained the support of the Senate to send it to an inquiry.

    We need many submissions to the Senate Criminal Code Amendment Inquiry to be submitted before 5 July. The Inquiry findings to be released on 13 November 2024.

  10. VIDEOS:
    Senator Lidia Thorpe in the Senate explaining the necessity for a Private Senators Bill to remove Attorney-General’s veto power [fiat]

    https://fb.watch/qFXgjnvrcb/

    https://www.facebook.com/reel/243942628759456

    In Senator Lidia Thorpe’s words [from lidiathorpe.com and senator.thorpe@aph.gov.au]:

    This inquiry is a rare opportunity for Truth-telling and exploring avenues to improve justice around Genocide and other atrocity crimes.

    Anyone can make a submission to the inquiry – all submissions will be read and will help to shape the government’s response when my Bill goes to a vote. Submissions close on 5 July 2024.

    That’s why we need plenty of submissions from people across the country. Your voice will count.

    LEARN ABOUT MAKING A SUBMISSION HERE.
    What is my Bill about?
    In this country, courts can only prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, if they get the consent of the Attorney-General of the day.

    In this country, courts can only prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes, if they get the consent of the Attorney-General of the day.

    This is known as the Attorney-General’s fiat power, and it means it’s up to an individual politician to say which cases of this nature can and can’t be looked at in court.

    This creates a clear conflict of interest and allows politicians to interfere in our justice system. No politician should get to say who can and can’t be held accountable for the most heinous crimes like Genocide.

    My bill is simple: it removes the AGs fiat power, so anyone is free to initiate prosecution of these crimes in Australian courts, whether the government of the day likes it or not.

    Genocide Bill
    All victims and survivors of the most heinous crimes like Genocide should be able to seek justice through legal systems that adhere to international standards and are free from political interference.
    But right now in this country, the Attorney-General has unchecked power to block prosecution of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity from proceeding in our courts. This power is called the AG’s fiat.

    That’s why I introduced a Private Senators Bill to strip the Attorney-General of this unjust and dangerous veto power: the Criminal Code Amendment (Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes) Bill 2024.

    You can read more on the background and purpose of the Bill HERE.

    In short, my Bill would:

    · Remove the requirement for the Attorney-General to consent to atrocity crime cases. This means anyone can file for proceedings on these crimes in a court.

    · Allow cases blocked by previous Attorneys-General since 2002 to be reviewed.

    Inquiry

    In February 2024, I gained support for a Senate inquiry into my Private Senator’s Bill.

    This is an opportunity to bring Genocide into the public awareness. It is an opportunity for Truth-telling.

    Among other things, the inquiry can cover matters such as:

    · The appalling track record of Australian governments in pursuing Genocide and other atrocity crimes;

    · Australia’s own history of treating its First Peoples and absolving itself of responsibility;

    · Blocked attempts to pursue cases of Genocide and other atrocity crimes in Australia;

    · Implications of the AG’s power (the AG’s fiat) on preventing and punishing Genocide and related atrocity crimes here and around the world;

    · How Australia can more effectively implement the Genocide Convention domestically.

    This inquiry is a rare opportunity for Truth-telling and exploring avenues to improve justice and prevent Genocide and other atrocity crimes from ever happening again.

    Submissions close on 5 July 2024 and the inquiry will hand down its findings on November 13. Please consider making a submission.

    You can send your submission to the Legal and Constitutional Affairs Senate Committee at LegCon.Sen@aph.gov.au or head to the committee’s inquiry website for information about the Bill and how to make a submission.

    You can find our guide on how to make a submission here

    If you have any further questions, please give my office a call on (03) 9070 1950 or email us at senator.thorpe@aph.gov.au.

    Background
    Australia signed the Genocide Convention in 1948 but has done little since to fulfil its duty to prevent and punish the worst crime of humanity.

    Australia delayed enacting the Convention into domestic law until 2002 when it was forced to, but included significant limitations. This means that no cases of Genocide, Crimes against Humanity or War Crimes can be pursued in a court in this country without the written consent of the Attorney General – and the Attorney General’s decision cannot be legally challenged.

    This veto power goes against the very intention of the Genocide Convention.

    No politician should get to say who can and can’t be held accountable in our legal system, particularly when it comes to the most heinous crimes.

    The Bill
    On 7 February 2024, Senator Lidia Thorpe introduced the Criminal Code Amendment (Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes) Bill 2024 to the Senate. The Bill will:

    · Remove the requirement for the Attorney General to consent to atrocity crime cases. This means anyone can file for proceedings on these crimes in a court, without the Attorney General being able to interfere.

    · Allow previous decisions by Attorney Generals to give or refuse consent to be reviewed.

    Guidelines to making a submission to the Genocide inquiry into
    Criminal Code Amendment (Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes) Bill 2024
    Information to include in your submission
    There are no right or wrong submissions. Submissions can be your personal story, your observations or insights into the need to prosecute perpetrators of genocide and crimes against humanity both here and overseas.

    Submissions can be provided as a written document, video or audio file, artwork, song and/or dance.

    Your submission must include:

    · Contact information: Your name, address, phone number

    · Confidentiality: If you want your submission to be kept confidential make sure you write that at the top of the page.

    Then go on to talk about:

    · Key Issues: Identify the key problems that need to be addressed

    · Evidence: To support the key issues, the enquiry will prefer “expert opinion” however all evidence from Sovereign Peoples is considered as expert evidence in our office

    · Case studies: How have you/your community/organisation been affected by the issue? For this part, you might want to remove any identifiable information

    · Recommendations: Include possible solutions, the committee will want to know how to address the problem(s)

    If your submission is quite long you may wish to include a summary at the beginning.

    Submission Tips
    The best submissions:

    · are relevant and highlight your own perspective

    · are concise, generally no longer than four to five pages

    · begin with a short introduction about yourself or the organisation you represent

    · emphasise the key points so that they are clear

    · outline not only what the issues are but how problems can be addressed, as the committee looks to submissions for ideas to make recommendations

    · only include documents that directly relate to your key points

    · only include information you would be happy to see published on the internet.

    Further submission information can be found here and an easy English guide to making a submission can be found here.

    Professor Ghillar, Michael Anderson adds:

    Before sending you might like to make the point that the current Act does not work for the population to make complaints against genocide when the only person to make case is the Federal Attorney-General . This is not synonymous with a free and democratic society. It is an Act that represents autocratic government
    The current Act is a clear representation of Australia’s worst nightmare, that is, the right of the people to bring actions and to have governments account for wrongdoings.
    Since 1986 both England and Australia have legislated to protect the Crown from any liabilities and culpabilities in their treatment against First Nations Peoples in Australia. But that is only to do with the monarch and not government policy.
    The text of two clauses 268.121–122 to be repealed from the Criminal Code 1995 is:

    268.121 Bringing proceedings under this Division

    (1) Proceedings for an offence under this Division must not be commenced without the Attorney General’s written consent.
    (2) An offence against this Division may only be prosecuted in the name of the Attorney General.
    (3) However, a person may be arrested, charged, remanded in custody, or released on bail, in connection with an offence under this Division before the necessary consent has been given.
    268.122 Attorney General’s decisions in relation to consents to be final
    (1) Subject to any jurisdiction of the High Court under the Constitution, a decision by the Attorney General to give, or to refuse to give, a consent under section 268.121:
    (a) is final; and
    (b) must not be challenged, appealed against, reviewed, quashed or called in question; and
    (c) is not subject to prohibition, mandamus, injunction, declaration or certiorari.
    (2) The reference in subsection (1) to a decision includes a reference to the following:
    (a) a decision to vary, suspend, cancel or revoke a consent that has been given;
    (b) a decision to impose a condition or restriction in connection with the giving of, or a refusal to give, a consent or to remove a condition or restriction so imposed;
    (c) a decision to do anything preparatory to the making of a decision to give, or to refuse to give, a consent or preparatory to the making of a decision referred to in paragraph (a) or (b), including a decision for the taking of evidence or the holding of an inquiry or investigation;
    (d) a decision doing or refusing to do anything else in connection with a decision to give, or to refuse to give, a consent or a decision referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c);
    (e) a failure or refusal to make a decision whether or not to give a consent or a decision referred to in a paragraph (a), (b), (c) or (d).
    (3) Any jurisdiction of the High Court referred to in subsection (1) is exclusive of the jurisdiction of any other court.
    Send it
    The deadline for submissions is July 5, 2024

    When you have finished your submission, there are 3 ways to send it to the committee.

    Via their website:

    Upload your submission here

    Via email:

    legcon.sen@aph.gov.au

    Via mail:

    Committee Secretary
    Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Committee
    PO Box 6100
    Parliament House
    Canberra ACT 2600

    The inquiry website can be found here.

    If you need assistance in completing your submission you can contact the committee directly on 02 6277 3560 or Senator Thorpe’s office on 03 9070 1950.

    Contact:

    Professor Ghillar, Michael Anderson

    Convenor of Sovereign Union of First Nations and Peoples in Australia

    and Head of State of the Euahlayi Peoples Republic

    ghillar29@gmail.com, 0499 080 660 http://www.sovereignunion.mobi

  11. VIDEOS:

    Senator Lidia Thorpe in the Senate explaining the necessity for a Private Senators Bill to remove Attorney-General’s veto power [fiat]

    https://fb.watch/qFXgjnvrcb/
    https://www.facebook.com/reel/243942628759456

    In Senator Lidia Thorpe’s words [from lidiathorpe.com and senator.thorpe@aph.gov.au]:

    This inquiry is a rare opportunity for Truth-telling and exploring avenues to improve justice around Genocide and other atrocity crimes.

    Anyone can make a submission to the inquiry – all submissions will be read and will help to shape the government’s response when my Bill goes to a vote. Submissions close on 5 July 2024.

    That’s why we need plenty of submissions from people across the country. Your voice will count.

  12. Would Prosecutor Ned please answer this question: After Oz ratified the Genocide Convention in 1948, was the crime of genocide prosecutable here? (If no, what about Frank Churches’ victory in court?)

    Would Dee please answer this question: As bad as the child-protection racket is in Australia, countrywide, the number of Aboriginal children grabbed into the horror is noticeably worse. Would new legislation regarding genocide have any alleviating effect?

    Correction of my spelling of “Ralph’s” name. It is Raphael Lemkin.

    Diane, I actually do favor everybody sending in “something” to the July deadline for Lidia Thorpe’s bill. Something is better than nothing.

    By the way, the UK fence-sat until 1969 on ratifying the 1948 convention. I think this is a good sign (for Lidia). It indicates that the Top Dogs in UK actually see criminalizing genocide as a worry for them.

  13. Whitney Webb saying the carbon credits are fully worked into the GreatReset financial system so you can get taxed on water and air too. She implicates Trump in the new thought police which is being developed by corporations right now. Lots of name dropping (15 min + )

    • So Joe, Trump gets a mention, and you run with it – as per usual. But have you even bothered yourself to verify that her, ‘implication’ is accurate?

      Will you answer that question or avoid it, like you tend to do?

  14. And here’s the self-same Mike Walsh affirming just how deranged the “Pro-Palestinian” mob actually is:

      • E.B. – are you aware of any differences in behavior within pro-Palestinian mobs, and Antifa?

        Are you of who funds them, and for what purpose?

          • SO WHO IS THE PUPPET?
            USS LIBERTY 1967.
            Hey E.B who were the REAL puppets?
            Try the US to get the US to attack Egypt. Remember operation Susannah?
            NEVER FORGET, NEVER AGAIN.
            ISRAEL will be left for LAST.
            ‘Q’

          • Oops, I stuffed up.
            The ‘puppets’ are controlled by the ‘puppet masters’.
            Guess who the puppet masters are!

          • So you reckon that Yahya Sinwar is an Israeli “plant” who’s somehow managed to be-fool the entire Arab community ?

            Or that he’s simply an unwitting Arab dupe who’s been manipulated by a bunch of conniving Jews ?
            A bunch of conniving Jews who’ve also managed to trick the rest of the world bar a coterie of super-canny conspiracy theorists ?

            Well given the survival-of-the-fittest-monkeys-to-man credo to which you adhere,both claims obviously mean that everything’s A-okay

        • E.B. stated: ‘ So you reckon Mary and Diane are Soros puppets?’

          How did you arrive at that assumption?

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.