[Editor’s Note: The government has just proposed a new lending scheme for new home owners. With $500 million in guarantees it will encourage young people into the HOUSING BUBBLE. The prime minister is keen to encourage the next generation into the debt factory. And now for the third of our election series.]
The Citizens Electoral Council (CEC)
The CEC is taking the fight against the criminal banking apparatus.
Except for the ACT, every Australian will have the opportunity to vote for the CEC’s policy agenda to:
- stop the bail-in theft of Australian bank deposits;
- break up the banks to separate normal banking from dangerous speculation; and
- rebuild Australia’s infrastructure and industries, financed with public credit from a national bank.
In time for the election, the CEC has launched a new website to assist people in participating in the CEC’s campaign.
Election goal
Aside from winning seats, the CEC’s goal in this election is to force Australia’s serious banking problems onto the political agenda. Banking is not a single issue. Unless the banking problems are fixed, the nation is headed for economic disaster.
The royal commission exposed that misconduct and criminality are rife in the banking system, but that is not the full picture. Unregulated banking practices have also created a massive bubble in the housing market, and left Australia with the second highest household debt in the world.
On top of it all the banks have run up close to $40 trillion in derivatives gambling debts.
At every stage the Reserve Bank of Australia and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) have assisted the banks in their misconduct and reckless speculation, while the government has stood by and let the banks run riot.
Consequently, Australia is in the same position now as countries such as the United States and Ireland were in early 2008—facing a massive financial crash, an “economic Armageddon”.
The crash in the housing market will crash the banks, which have the highest exposure to housing of any banks in the world. This will crash the economy which has become concentrated in financial services and construction. And it will threaten the banks’ derivatives speculation, which could potentially trigger a meltdown in the $1.2 quadrillion (thousand trillion) global derivatives bubble.
A derivatives meltdown will be the excuse for international banking authorities to direct APRA to bail in Australian bank deposits—to effectively sacrifice the savings of Australians in order to prop up the failing banks so they don’t default on their derivatives obligations and cause a global crisis.
This is a danger to all Australians, which trumps all other election issues, but the CEC is the only party addressing it.
Corruption
What are the major parties, and the media for that matter, saying about banking in this election campaign? Nothing, that’s what. Given that we have just finished a royal commission that proved that both major parties protected bank crimes for years—the ALP just a few years less than the Liberals—this is a scandal.
Banking should be dominating this election, and the major parties should be tripping over each other to be the toughest on banking misconduct and crimes, which would be very popular. It is a sure sign of the corruption of Australian politics that they are not.
With the individual banks, the Australian Banking Association under ex-Labor premier Anna Bligh, the big four global accounting firms that hide bank crimes, and property developers, as the biggest donors to the major parties, it is clear why the major parties want to sweep banking issues under the carpet, and do the bare minimum in response to the royal commission.
The CEC is calling on Australian voters to not just support the CEC’s candidates, but also confront all of the candidates in their electorates and demand to know where they stand on bail-in, breaking up the banks, and a national bank. Do they support bank customers having their deposits seized to prop up failing banks? If not, what are they going to do about bail-in?
Do they support breaking up the banks so bankers can’t gamble with deposits or lure customers into risky investments they don’t need? If so, will they vote for the Banking System Reform (Separation of Banks) Bill 2019 that is before the Senate?
Do they support a national bank that can invest public credit in the infrastructure Australia desperately needs, lend to small business and productive industry, and generally ensure that the important areas of the economy function properly?
Preferences
The CEC is not able to run candidates in every seat, partly because the major parties have conspired to price out independently funded parties and candidates by doubling the nomination fee again. This is how the major parties collude—faced with losing increasing votes to minor parties and independents, instead of changing their policies they work out how to block competition.
Let’s ensure that whoever wins this election, when they take their seats in the House and Senate they have banking separation ringing in their ears!
The CEC Candidates are:
Victoria: Craig Isherwood, Gabrielle Peut
New South Wales: Ann Lawler, Robert Butler
Northern Territory: Trudy Campbell, Peter Flynn
Western Australia: Jean Robinson, Barry Mason
South Australia: Sean Allwood, Paul Siebert
Queensland: Jan Pukallus, Danny Hope
Tasmania: Ray Williams, Steve Kucina
CEC House of Representatives Candidates: Keith Kerr, Chris Lahy
Where the CEC doesn’t have candidates, vote and preference those candidates and parties that support taking on the banks. The parties that are genuine include:
- Katter’s Australian Party—Bob Katter was the first to introduce the Separation of banks bill into Parliament, in June 2018;
- The Greens—have become serious champions of bank separation and a people’s bank;
- Pauline Hanson’s One Nation—Pauline Hanson introduced the Separation of Banks bill into the Senate in February, and her fellow Senator Peter Georgiou referred it to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee for an inquiry, the outcome of which the panicked Liberals have rigged on behalf of the banks;
- Centre Alliance—Rebekha Sharkie supported Bob Katter’s introduction of the Separation of Banks bill, and the Centre Alliance senators voted for a motion to break up the banks in September 2018.
They need to introduce the Glass-Steagall Act
They need to change the Corporations Act
The ATO is illegal and requires legislation to sort out and criminalise those in the scam
Australian Tax Office Illegal Entity? It appears so
http://larryhannigan.com/australian_tax_office_is_an_illegal_entity.htm
Stop the Illegal Australian Tax Office
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Stop-the-illegal-Australian-Tax-Office/198251116872691
page5image13440 page5image13600 page5image13760 page5image13920 page5image14080
Australian Tax Office has Illegal Powers to Search Your Home (Law to be revoked asap!)
page5image15696
Australian tax office “not a legal entity”
http://www.australiamatters.com/cms/?p=125
ATO is not a legal entity by its own admission
http://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7402
The ATO is also a private, foreign owned business, http://www.aussiestockforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7402
Hence it is called “Office”, not “Department.” If the ATO denies being foreign owned private business, make them sign a JP witnessed Statutory Declaration so they can perjure themselves.
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/tax.htm
Is the ATO operating legally? – http://www.itwillpass.com/tax_ato_not_legal.shtml ATO is an Illegal Entity – http://www.itwillpass.com/tax_ato_non_legal_entity.shtml
ATO (Australian Tax Office) Is illegal By Its Own Admission – Lifting The Veil of Deception
-http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/130
High Court Transcript – Moeliker v Chapman B8/2000 (17 May 2000)
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/hca/transcripts/2000/B8/1.html
page5image22920 page5image23080 page5image23240 page5image23400
http://www.loveforlife.com.au/files/ATO-illegal%20entity%20by%20it's%20own%20admission- actual%20docs%20to%20prove%20it-1.pdf
http://www.itwillpass.com/tax_ato_non_legal_entity.shtml http://www.brumbywatchaustralia.com/Principality12.htm http://www.brumbywatchaustralia.com/Principality40.htm
Australia Taxation Office aka ATO
**https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nygCEIMGlc
“CEC is running a slate of Senate candidates in every state and the Northern Territory.” Let’s have the names of those persons so we can sharpen our pencil to get ready to tick some boxes.
Oops, sorry, they are listed above.
Mal or Phil, would you kindly write a question to any of them and put the reply here? Dee would do it but she is out of range.
Thank you Gumshoe ,
CEC , about time , calling it as it is .
Calling it is one thing… rectifying it is another animal.
How can the banks go bust , if they have been sucking the blood of their customers for over 40 years .
Can’t see that result , especially when they make the money out of thin air .
The government and banks have no debt .
Taxation and compounding interest makes their lives sweet .
The majority in debt and broke , living from week to week (if you’re lucky to have a job) and about to be shafted big time , are we the people .
56, From my understanding of what goes on in the banking industry and Government, the Government by the Constitution is instructed to create the Nation’s currency. But they don’t. Crime No1. They instead borrow from the international bankers, (The International Central Banks, IMF and World Bank), crime No2.
To create the loan’s money for home loans the Big Four Banks borrow internationally, from the Central Banks who create money out of “thin air”. Our banks are then required to repay interest on that “funny money” every 90 days. When the Big Four borrow from overseas they use their depositors’ funds as collateral.
Yes , our Reserve bank is part of the central bankers cartel . They are connected at the hip.
They’re the ones I meant .
Don’t expect me to vote for the greens, they may want to separate the banks etc but every other policy of theirs is just loony. They are called watermelons for a very good reason. Green on the outside but commie red on the inside. They are a party that call themselves environmentalists but they have been comped and turned into movements of division like all the others.
In answer to your earlier question, ” how could the Banks go bust taking into account their fleecing of customers over the years?”, I guess the answer is all those profits have been expended in providing huge dividends to their shareholders to inflate the share price, excessive payments to executive staff, buying out competitors and gambling on derivatives. As well donations to politicians electoral expenses, another name, bribes, as in don’t look at what we are doing illegally.
Mal ,
Tragic , but that’s the truth .
Technocratic plutocracy cartel .
Mal, in response to this issue…”all those profits have been expended in providing huge dividends to their shareholders to inflate the share price, excessive payments to executive staff, buying out competitors and gambling on derivatives”
Who might those major shareholders be, pray tell??
HSBC Custody Nominees(Australia) Limited
J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited
Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited
National Nominees Limited
BNP Paribas Noms Pty Limited
All primary treasury bond dealers of the US Federal Reserve.
Incidentally, it’s just about the same for every ASX 200 company. The Cabal has their hooks in deep.
This is certainly good news and I will be supporting the CEC candidates in the NT.
That said, exercise caution voters, and know where this loyalty leads.
The CEC… Created by American Lyndon Larouche, also owner of the Business Intelligence Review. Several years ago, the CEC executive requested I align with them and, in fact, join. I refused for one reason, the CEC and its entire executive globally are implacably opposed to democracy. (ie Government of the people, by the people and for the people).
They instead support good leadership. But what does this actually mean.
Lord Johannes Acton, arguably, the most penetrating political analyst of all time, pointed out that leadership is an exercise in unilateralism (as opposed to multilatertalism), in which all power is assumed by the apex of a power pyramid which, variously, can take the form of elected leadership, a monarchy, a plutocratic elite, a military dictatorship, or a theocracy (ie the Vatican).
Globalist theory aside, history teaches us that all hierarchies are corrupted; some sooner, some later.
As Acton put it: power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
More broadly, all hierarchies become repressive and corrupt. In contemporary parlance, all leadership is embryonic corruption and dictatorship; it’s all just a matter of time.
So fellow Aussies, by all means, support the CEC for the time being (ie the enemy of my enemy is my friend) but sooner or later, the CEC will merely replace the oppressor.
Tony
Some historical background on Larouche while researching the Knights of Malta
~ Illuminati News ~
http://www.illuminati-news.com/112606b.htm
In 1978, following hard upon the assassinations of Dresdner Bank head Jürgen Ponto, German industrialist Hanns-Martin Schleyer, and Aldo Moro, the Knights of Malta were caught red-handed coordinating an assassination operation against Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr. LaRouche was the intellectual author of the Bremen summit of that year, where French President Valéry Giscard d’Estaing, West German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt, and British Prime Minister James Callaghan (the last under duress) signed the Bremen Communiqué, which announced the formation of the European Monetary System. The EMS, in the words of one West German official, was intended to be “the seed crystal of a new world monetary system.” Bremen struck horror into the hearts of the world’s oligarchy. Said one senior officer of the Banque Bruxelles-Lambert, owned by the Belgian Rothschilds, “It is recognized that it was LaRouche’s program that went through at Bremen. If it goes through now, certain important financial centers are going to lose their power. A lot of people are not going to like that.” The director of a Knights-run institute in Belgium was more succinct: “LaRouche is the first enemy of the London group.” In New York, Knight Henry S. Bloch, director of Warburg, Pincus investment bank, whose hands investigators discovered to be holding many of the strings of the plot, proclaimed LaRouche to be “very dangerous,” and pointedly compared him to Malcolm X, assassinated in 1965.
In their investigations of the SMOM, LaRouche’s associates “discovered to their surprise that the mere mention of its name inspires awe and terror in the minds of highly placed government officials, central bankers, senior military and business leaders, and senior diplomatic and intelligence executives,” as recorded in a pamphlet issued by the LaRouche organization at the time, “The `Black International’ Terrorist Assassination Plot to Kill Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.” The pamphlet further reported, “The power that the Order concentrates is primarily financial, through direct control of most of the Western world’s leading investment houses” and far, far more. The pamphlet also noted, “A second source of power is an absolutely unmatched intelligence capability.” Which is to say, the SMOM is a leading organizational arm of the Synarchy, bringing together the world’s leading aristocrats, financiers, and particularly military and intelligence officials. Its members yearn for the ultramontane world which existed before the rise of sovereign nation-states during the Renaissance, which meant a loss of power and privilege of their families. To them, that vanished world is as if yesterday. Indeed, it has by no means entirely disappeared, but lives on, centered—like the Knights themselves—on the Venetian-descended “independent central banks” of virtually every nation in the world, as LaRouche has emphasized.
No mention of immigration by any of the 3 parties responding. A big source of your housing problems.
We do not make profits from our wages or salaries so no tax is payable from them, moreover our wages or salaries are compensation not “Income” therefore they are not taxable either way.
Wiki has a good item on Lyndon Larouche. He was a Quaker from New Hampshire. I thought he was ex-Germany.
So we are all here to express a considered democratic opinion.
So what, who is going to read, it let alone consider the detail?
Even if a msm reads this site, will they take any notice?
No. We spraying into the wind.
But, bugger it.
Why not enjoy it is a more cleansing shower than the usual lot of BS we get from rusted on fascist New World Order UN politicians and MSMs
Time to Restructure the Banking System
Time to create a Rural Reconstruction and Development Bank
https://www.cirnow.com.au/time-to-restructure-the-banking-system/
Combank Money Laundering
https://www.cirnow.com.au/combank-money-laundering/
Who Runs the CountryWho runs this country? Everyone thinks the Federal Government is at the top of the Government System, with the State Governments below that, followed by the Local Councils. https://www.cirnow.com.au/who-runs-the-country/
WeThePeople-Constitutional
We the People are the only ones with the right to decide who governs us
Our Federal Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and States can make any laws they wish as long as they do not contravene the Constitution.
In the event of a question about a State Law, Constitutional laws always override State Laws.
But here’s the kicker!
What most Australians don’t know is that the State governments can, in theory at least, dismiss the Federal government if they wish!
Think about the implications of this.