Home Australia COVID-19 Could Lead to Disarming More Citizens?

COVID-19 Could Lead to Disarming More Citizens?

45

by Guerriera P

Are patterns repeating? Many have claimed that one objective of the Port Arthur event in 1996 was to disarm Australians.

A reader has alerted Gumshoe that any Covid-19 violation by a person holding a gun licence could result in the licence being suspended or canceled — and presumably, the gun confiscated.

Even Port Arthur could not disarm the Australian public, but the government is still trying. Gumshoe was sent a letter that had been authored by the Licensing and Regulation Division, Victoria Police. It reads:

“Good afternoon,

The Licensing and Regulation Division (LRD) regulate the firearms industry to ensure public safety and peace and continually assess the suitability for individuals to hold a firearm licence. It is expected that if you hold a firearm licence you are aware of the firearm safety standards to keep yourself, your family and others around you safe.

The LRD would like to remind all firearm licence holders that they must follow each of the Chief Health Officer’s (CHO’s) directives which are currently in place to slow the spread of the coronavirus and keep the community safe.

Victoria Police takes breaches of licence conditions and CHO restrictions seriously. Blatant and deliberate disregard of the CHO’s directions endangers public safety and calls into question a licence holders suitability to be licenced in an area that requires a strong emphasis on safety.

Should a licence holder blatantly and deliberately breach the CHO’s restrictions, your licence can be suspended, cancelled or may be subject to a reprimand which could harm any future licensing.

If you are unsure around what activities are permitted under the CHO’s directives, please visit the Department of Health and Human Services website or phone the Coronavirus hotline on 1800 675 398.

More information about the LRD’s response to COVID-19 can be found on the Victoria Police website – Firearms.

Regards,
Licensing and Regulation Division, Regulatory Services Department
Victoria Police”

— end of letter —

The Gumshoe reader added (abbreviated) this to his correspondence to Gumshoe.

“…I didn’t believe it when I was told… I’m so very perturbed by the paradigm in which we find ourselves. I have worked incredibly hard over many years on the land providing food for Australia.

“Drought brought my farming to a grinding halt… and we had to start all over again.  We are basic, conservative folk, with no barrows to push…. until now. I’m incredulous that our society (and all things held dear) has/have degenerated to the point we are now at. My interactions with the police over a lifetime amount to a couple of speeding tickets… and yet here I am fearful the rifle I received as a present for my twenty-first birthday, many decades ago could be taken from me for failing to wear a mask whilst driving my car with the window open at a traffic light.

“This only goes to reinforce my belief that there is more afoot than the government combating a virus of questionable pathogenicity. It is deeply disturbing…

A grateful reader.”

Port Arthur Revisited

Is this another attempt to punish gun licence holders?

This has happened all before when the Port Arthur false flag resulted in the gun buyback. Let us once again review the evidence. We are not being conspiratorial — just focusing on the facts of the case.

The evidence shows that Martin Bryant was not the shooter in the cafe; that he did not have the capacity, nor the motive to be behind the massacre. A witness, Jim Laycock, who saw the shooter near the General Store, had known Martin as a child, and said it was not him.

The skill required to shoot 12 people and injure 10 in 15 seconds (right-handed from the hip) is equal to the most proficient marksman. By the way, Bryant was a left-handed shooter. And the shooter had also handled a tray and soda drink in the cafe, but no DNA evidence or fingerprints from Bryant was found.

The AR 15, and the very rare SLR .308 was not owned or used by Bryant. His AR-10 (.308) had been taken away from him a month earlier by Terry Hill when he went into Hill’s Gunshop with it loaded and in poor condition. Also, it is also ludicrous to believe that Bryant was managing a siege whilst making sandwiches and tea for the ‘hostages,’ shooting back at police, and talking to the negotiator all at the same time.

And now for a short explanation video by Dee McLachlan:

SHARE

45 COMMENTS

  2. So “a grateful reader” is incredulous
    Well I’m not

    In 2005 my oldest son lodged an appeal against a Police refusal to grant him a firearms licence.
    An appeal judge ordered the officers to serve him with a copy of their internal record according
    Two memos showed up. Here are three word-for-word extracts:

    “G is a perpetual complainant” (G was a friend who had approved his rural as a practice range)

    “Certain Police actions have attracted criticism from Ms. Berry” (criticism, as in a letter published in a local paper

    “ It’s my information that Mrs. Berry has had interaction with the State Government in relation to the home education of her children” (kinda speaks for itself)

    • As my stint with the Education Department(“interaction with the State Government”) woke me up to the fact that licensing, in any shape or form, is always THE no.1 tool of political oppression, I guess it’s hardly surprising that it was cited as a reason to refuse my son’s application

  3. Those in authority are becoming mentally sicker by the day. How could any sane being make a connection between a gun owners licence and a so-called disease? They must be in a state of panic, knowing that their ludicrous decisions may push someone over the top, into using a weapon against them.

    If those in authority started to act on behalf of the citizens, and in line with the law, in other words stop their acts of treason, there would be no danger of the above happening. But if they continue to act out the orders of the Cabal, this may very well happen and soon.

  4. Ta Dee.
    I as a citizen of Australia respectfully request : That all politicians and controlled msm NWO/UN traitors, to advise as to whether you honour the ANZACS Who served the protection of Australia’s sovereignty or now, just piss off to some other fascist state, before you lot are chased down the street as outlaws to our democratic values and sovereignty
    Make up your minds, choose Australia as either, a sovereign Independent state or a UN Bankers corporate vassal.
    Cops of Australia, wake up, your children’s futures are in the hands of fascist dictates just using you (as Hitler’s brown shirts)) to enslave we, who pay your salaries.
    Right, just show your manhood, with handcuffs on our people, weill cope, many made this country wearing ankle iron bracelets as did some of my forebears. Then they as independent humans, as did many, make Austtralis and fought to protect Australia.
    Feel proud Victoria police? Go home and tell your family you just did your job and condemned your children and grand children to the world of Hitler, Stalin and Mao’s world at the behest of the banker’’s corporate enslavement agenda.
    Good one. Tell your family who you worked for today and the sane people are just conspiracy theorists. Pity, tell your kids about some history. Nah, you are just a compliant copper, never learnt anything about history at Goulburn!

    • Spot on Ned.

      Any copper who follows out an order like this, especially when confronted with a pregnant woman (as per the Ballarat case), should have stared down his superior officer and refused knowing that it was unlikely he’d be sacked ( the Police Union and a good many honest coppers would’ve backed him by way of a state wide show of solidarity / refusal to work until their comrade was reinstated).

      In the event that he was sacked, he would’ve won 5 lifetimes of earnings in wrongful dismissal / pain and suffering trauma compensation if he’d litigated.

      What a gutless coward.

    • Hello Ned – love your passion and downright honesty. Many of your words echo my own thoughts – especially about pondering what they are doing to their own children/grandchildren or looking in the mirror every day and thinking of that Grand Funk Railroad song:

      Let me share what I have learned recently – we (and I mean WE) keep falling into their trap by using their lexicon.

      The following topical article by Mike King states:

      “But how many people actually understand what Fascism is? How many have ever even given the question any thought, let alone objective study?”

      https://realhistorychannel.org/what-is-fascism

      I had PRECISELY those thoughts and decided to do my own research …

      Here are a few bullet points from one source (Oswald Mosley). He defines “Fascism” as follows (just some of his key points):

      *1. challenges the dogma whereby the fabric of international capitalism (i.e. Marxist Oligarchy) is considered of more importance than the individual and collective well-being of the workers or citizens.

      *2. challenges the corrupt working of the so-called democratic system (i.e. the (we) brainwashed masses ruled by Marxist Oligarchs – think of the choices of the ‘pre-selected’ we have), whereby party machines with colossal monetary resources are enabled to establish “caucus-regimes” utterly unrepresentative of any of the integral social elements in the country. (When was the last time you can recall a ‘democratic’ politician anywhere actually making decisions and ’laws’ for the common good? – ‘unlawful’ to ‘incite’.)

      *3. challenges the so-called “free press” dominated by millionaire company-promoters (eg Bronfman, Meyer, Ochs et al – Marxist/Jewish Oligarchs) who are themselves subordinate to (or agents of) the great financial and advertising interests on whom their revenue depends.

      *4. challenges the covert but all-pervading influence of the Jews via ‘Cultural Marxism’ on the life of the community. [Think Weimar regime – Magnus Hirschfeld et al promoting debauchery and depravity – think of Hollywood and the entire music/entertainment/porn industry.]

      BTW, Mike King (Real History Channel – formerly Tomato Bubble) has produced an impressive body of work – you can look up his book titles (or I can provide links if you wish) . Yet he is a strong advocate of Q / Q-Anon AND Donald Trump – so maybe there is hope after all – and therefore I remain open minded. And on that basis alone you should give him some attention.

      In particular, he makes a very strong connection between the Q Anon motto WWG1WGA and the defining Fascist symbol of bundled rods – strength in unity.

      In short, “Fascism” is one of those words that has been demonised precisely BECAUSE it opposes everything that Marxist Oligarch tyranny stands for.

      Think about this …

      “Fascism” promotes self-sufficient nationalism and national sovereignty, preservation of culture, decency and morality for the common good. (It does not’ ‘persecute’ anyone – except perhaps the oligarch banksters.) The latter requires a degree of discipline, self-restraint and an actual desire to contribute to the community, not divide and destroy it. In particular, Fascism is against global Zionist/Marxist Oligarchy.

      “Antifa” is, by definition, against (anti) “Fascism”.

      So who is Antifa (aka BLM / aka ISIS in another setting) working for and what do they stand for? – They are the attack dogs of the Oligarchs.

      Oswald Mosley was definitely a Fascist (he said so – see points above). Hitler and Mussolini were “Fascists” in label only because they stood for the same principles (self-sufficient nationalism etc) against global Marxist Oligarchic tyranny. By definition of his actions and words, Putin comes as close to the same – he just doesn’t need the label.

      I would choose Fascism under an enlightened and benevolent monarch or autocrat over Antifa and its supporters (eg Daniels) and their globalist masters any day.

  5. I suspect that it will not be long before private houses will be violated without warrant, searching those houses for firearms whether licenced or not.

    • Well they just dream up a new law and put it on the website, if you are 18 you are supposed to know all the laws, remember “ignorance of the law is no excuse”? Everyone should know all the applicable state and federal laws by their 18th birthday. Even the ones that went up on the website 5 minutes ago. That’s what the chip on your head is for. Elon Musk will glue one into your skull for a few $1000’s. Just do what the chip tells you, you’ll be ok, excepting for the software contract, which states “no liability”.
      Meanwhile, I get emails from a crowd doing 3d metal printing, yes sounds weird I agree but they are serious. It comes in as some type of paste and gets baked, shrinkage is all calculated. So as long as you don’t have the chip in your skull, you can print as many weapons as you want.

      (Watch out Veggie, I am under your bed right now).

  6. Also this on the Port Arthur False Flag (from acclaimed author Keith Allan Noble) :

    “With professional precision the gunman killed 32 people [with an approximately similar number of rounds at or near the Port Arthur historic site – 3 more died at the Seascape cottage], shooting without the benefit of laser sights, from the right hip – an almost impossible task for even the world’s top 1 % of combat marksmen, let alone a mentally impaired left hander.

    Of the 20 fatalities at the Broad Arrow Cafe, 19 were due to a single shot to the head from an AR-15 assault rifle. The percussion and recoil of such a weapon in a confined space would have disoriented even a highly trained marksman – unless he was wearing combat earphones under his long blonde wig.

    The killer left the cafe and swapped over to a Belgian FN assault rifle – a heavier weapon with twice the recoil – and yet somehow immediately compensated to maintain his awesome 1.6 to 1 killed to injured ratio (35 dead to 22 injured).

  7. Following up with this on the Port Arthur psyop :

    “Martin Bryant could not have been responsible for the mass murder at Port Arthur.
    There was an almost satanic accuracy to that shooting performance.
    Whoever did it is better than I am – and there are not too many people better than I am.

    If it was someone of only average skills, there would have been many less killed and many more wounded. It was part of a deliberate attempt to disarm the population.” …..

    ……. Brigadier Ted Serong DSO OBE – former head of Australian Forces in Vietnam.

    • Hey Veggie Scraps, as a fellow contrarian against GloboCap, I say you should always give your sources.

      Now you quote Ted Serong: leaving aside that I do no recall him saying what you allege in your last para., because it is far too truthful for The Age, the balance of the quote is from is an interview with him conducted by The Age in I think 1999.

      Between then and about 5 years ago you could locate it in the online archive of The Age.

      And then suddenly it disappeared out of the archive.

      And now when I look at The Age online, I see that the archive function has vanished entirely.

      Even normie sheeples who take out subs in the naive belief that they will find in The Age anything but liberaloid consumerism incl. real estate envy under a thick treacle of malicious and self-righteous albophobic identity politics cannot use the archive any more.

      • Ted Serong’s quote came from Keith Allan Noble’s book :

        https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1391387382l/18267787.jpg

        My understanding is that he sourced it from an interview Serong did with the Sydney Morning Herald (no doubt also printed in The Age as Fairfax owned the lot 20 years ago)

        Meanwhile, this paragraph on Ted Serong in Wikipedia :

        “He was considered a world authority on counter-insurgency operations, and wrote widely on the subject in the 1970s. Described by John Farquharson as a major Cold War figure, Serong was recognised internationally for developing new tactics for counter-insurgency and jungle warfare.

        In retirement he became involved in anti-communist organisations and citizens’ militia groups such as Ausi Freedom Scouts (Australians United for Survival and Freedom), of which he was a patron.

        He also supported conspiracy theories about the Port Arthur shooting in 1996 and allegations of government corruption (later found to have been based on a hoax, albeit unbeknown to Serong).”

        I’d love to hear Wikipedia’s explanation on how they PROVED that Serong’s beliefs on the Port Arthur psyop were ‘later found to be based on a hoax’.

        Of course, well never hear it as they’ll keep ducking and weaving avoiding the issue (much like you do Dung when refusing to explain how the Earth went into an Ice Age with CO2 at between 3000 and 4000 ppm).

        • Ho ho Veggie Scraps, you have been referred by me long since (see GS archive) to a patient scientific explanation of the C02 and temperature lag issue.

          But as dsw will likely agree, the fact that you cannot comprehend even a layman’s account of this matter speaks volumes.

    • All part of the lead up to our current circumstance.

      A Second Letter to Thomas F. Bayard,

      CHALLENGING HIS RIGHT, AND THAT OF ALL OTHER
      SO-CALLED SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS,
      TO EXERCISE ANY LEGISLATIVE POWER WHATEVER
      OVER THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES (1884)

      by Lysander Spooner (1808-1887)

      To Thomas F. Bayard of Delaware:

      http://praxeology.net/LS-LB.htm

      “…..……1. No man can delegate, or give to another, any right of arbitrary dominion over himself; for that would be giving himself away as a slave. And this no one can do. Any contract to do so is necessarily an absurd one, and has no validity. To call such a contract a “constitution,” or by any other high-sounding name, does not alter its character as an absurd and void contract.

      No man can delegate, or give to another, any right of arbitrary dominion over a third person; for that would imply a right in the first person, not only to make the third person his slave, but also a right to dispose of him as a slave to still other persons. Any contract to do this is necessarily a criminal one, and therefore invalid. To call such a contract a “constitution” does not at all lessen its criminality, or add to its validity. These facts, that no man can delegate, or give away, his own natural right to liberty, nor any other man’s natural right to liberty, prove that he can delegate no right of arbitrary dominion whatever — or, what is the same thing, no legislative power whatever — over himself or anybody else, to any man, or body of men.

      This impossibility of any man’s delegating any legislative power whatever, necessarily results from the fact that the law of nature has drawn the line — and that, too, [*5] a line that can never be effaced nor removed — between each man’s own interest and inalienable rights of person and property, and each and every other man’s inherent and inalienable rights of person and property. It, therefore, necessarily fixes the unalterable limits, within which every man may rightfully seek his own happiness, in his own way, free from all responsibility to, or interference by, his fellow men, or any of them.

      All this pretended delegation of legislative power — that is, of a power, on the part of the legislators, so-called, to make any laws of their own device, distinct from the law of nature — is therefore an entire falsehood; a falsehood whose only purpose is to cover and hide a pure usurpation, by one body of men, of arbitrary dominion over other men. That this legislative power, or power of arbitrary dominion, is a pure usurpation, on the part of those who now exercise it, and not a “trust” delegated to them, is still further proved by the fact that the only delegation of power, that is even professed or pretended to be made, is made secretly — that is, by secret ballot — and not in any open and authentic manner; and therefore not by any men, or body of men, who make themselves personally responsible, as principals, for the acts of those to whom they profess to delegate the power.

      All this pretended delegation of power having been made secretly — that is, only by secret ballot — not a single one of all the legislators, socalled, who profess to be exercising only a delegated power, has himself any legal knowledge, or can offer any legal proof, as to who the particular individuals were who delegated it to him. And having no power to identify the individuals who professed to delegate the power to him, he cannot show any legal proof that anybody ever even attempted or pretended to delegate it to him.

      Plainly, a man who exercises any arbitrary dominion over other men and who claims to be exercising only a delegated power, but cannot show who his principals are, nor, consequently, prove that he has any principals, must be presumed, both in law and reason, to have no principals; and therefore to be exercising no power but his own. And having, of right, no such power of his own, he is, both in law and reason, a naked usurper.

      Sir, a secret ballot makes a secret government; and a secret government is a government by conspiracy; in which the people at large can have no rights. And that is the only government we now have. It is the government of which you are a voluntary member and supporter, and yet you claim to be an honest man. If you are an honest man, is not your honesty that of a thoughtless, ignorant man, who merely drifts with the current, instead of exercising any judgement of his own?

      https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55a3c833e4b07c31913e6eae/t/55a52475e4b0bf42f2b02cd7/1436886133244/A LETTER TO THOMAS Bayard.pdf

  8. Boy, did I have to search & search to find this:

    A few years ago a veritable host of such material would have come up straight away. Now you have to plow through a quagmire of mendacity and subterfuge

    • Well that was interesting to hear from those hillbillies about their families getting sieged and shot by federal agents, personally I don’t think the Nuremberg Defence should apply to anyone, seems to me the government would have to throw out all references to the bible first.

      • It’s fairly obvious that Randy Weaver’s perfunctory contact with the Aryan Nations was purely incidental to what took place, that the key unresolved issue was/is the Cosa Nostra-style violence that’s ALWAYS the coalface of ALL arbitrary restrictions. At the time ( 1991 – 92) I was in the thick of a licensing feud with WA’s Education Department, a matter that, to this day, remains unresolved. I remember thinking “Holy, this is like dealing with the Mafia”.

  9. The fact that someone with a firearm license receives a letter like that does not bode well for firearm owners. Basically, it is telling the people that if you rock the boat in regards to this ‘plandemic’, then the government can and will disarm you.

    It had been more than a decade since I last looked at the NSW Firearms Act and when I did today there were new sections I had never heard of. The government can amend the Act anytime and often do without the people knowing. Here’s the most recent copy of the NSW Act,

    http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/fa1996102/

    If the police want to disarm you, all they have to do is consider you a “not a fit and proper person” – you know, one of those conspiracy theorists that won’t wear a mask, or writes articles disputing the medical authorities, or …

    I suggest everyone take a quick look through the Firearms Act and read the various sections. If you have watched the video that Berry posted, ‘Innocents Betrayed’, many of the sections of the Firearms Act will sound familiar.

    Decades ago I would tell people that Port Arthur was a psy-op to disarm Ozzies. Most of the time I would get a response like “That’s crazy, why would the government kill its own people to disarm them?” – Perhaps now that Ozzies can reflect on recent events of this Plandemic, they may be waking up.

  10. GOOD PEOPLE OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA, RISE UP

    ON Saturday, September 5, 2020, there will be a rally at the East end of Rundle Street at NOON.
    Please rock up. f you are pregnant, don’t go. But how many of us are pregnant?

    Bring water. wear a sign (How about “We love our cops”). Take pix. Thank you.

    • Typo. “If” you are pregnant.

      Also second thought about taking pix. Maybe leave your cell phone at home.

      I forgot to say the purpose of the rally. Something to do with oppressive laws.

    • Beware Mary, you may be handcuffed if you return; for thinking, writing or inciting others to think as you do.
      Strange that in every election politicians incite the public not to vote for the fellow traitor opposing their thoughts on policy.
      Suppose the winner will be able to charge all voters who did not vote for his crew, for incitement for naughty thoughts and Marking a ballot paper for the wrong candidate.
      Rediculous? No that is a system in some countries resolved by only enabling The right candidate to stand for election.

  11. Leighton and John Holland, who have been building Victorian roads and tunnels, have been sold to the CCP.
    Dan Andrews salary is half million per year, his black money income is unknown.
    During the nights, planes are continuously coming in from China, to all Oz cities under lockdown.
    Nationwide, 500 people have died from crown virus.
    Of those 40 have been under the age of seventy.

    Turn off the wide screen idiot box, it’s all crown kabal communist cyber surveillance now.
    Next step is the gulags, managed by Serco, that have appeared like mushrooms all over Oz.
    Repeating, this place is the launching pad for the beast dragon alliance from hell.

  12. Zapata Interviewed Today:

    https://banned.video/watch?id=5f502ca4838dfb0597e450ce

    Brave Woman Serves Notices On Palm Beach Councilors https://twitter.com/Dafibonaccii/status/1301190114794758150?s=20

    "In violation and outside your oath of office." "No authority to shut down Palm Beach County and mandate anything." "You are in violation of the following codes...."

    Pregnant Australian Woman Arrested and Taken From Home By Police For A Facebook Protest Post

    On the ball except for being off the mark with China.

    https://banned.video/watch?id=5f4fafef838dfb0597e3897d

    This is the post she was taken to jail for - "Peaceful Protest" "Wear Mask" "Social Distancing...So We Don't Get Arrested" "We Live In A Free Country" .....................

    https://worldchangebrief.webnode.com/l/zapata-speaks-veteran-who-made-warning-shot-heard-round-the-world-interviewed/

  13. I agree that it’s better to concentrate on the allegation of Chinese planes coming in (is it true?) but if you want to hear a story of how you can end up on the street, try this:

  14. Pregnant Australian Woman Arrested and Taken From Home By Police For A Facebook Protest Post

    This is on the ball except for being off the mark with China.

    https://banned.video/watch?id=5f4fafef838dfb0597e3897d

    This is the post she was taken to jail for - "Peaceful Protest" "Wear Mask" "Social Distancing...So We Don't Get Arrested" "We Live In A Free Country" .....................

    https://worldchangebrief.webnode.com/l/zapata-speaks-veteran-who-made-warning-shot-heard-round-the-world-interviewed/

  15. A Cairns News special presentation
    .
    President of the senate, Liberal Party Senator Stephen Parry
    .
    Parry must break silence on post-massacre report
    .
    A senator has refused to comment about allegations he had prior knowledge of the Port Arthur massacre in 1996 when 35 innocent people were killed in a precision shooting operation.
    .
    Another 23 men, women and children were wounded by a trained and methodical gunman with long blond hair.
    .
    Revelations by Austrian-based author and researcher, Keith Noble, that Senator Stephen Parry had prior knowledge of the shootings, have not been refuted.
    .
    Parry at the time was a qualified embalmer and a former member of Tasmania Police who led a team of embalmers which handled the bodies in 1996.
    .
    An Australian, Mr Noble is leading a campaign to free accused shooter Martin Bryant from Risdon Gaol in Tasmania.
    .
    A paper written and presented in 1997 by Stephen Parry entitled ‘Port Arthur Massacre – AFDA National Embalming Team – Detailed Report’, that appears in a little-known book entitled ‘PORT ARTHUR SEMINAR PAPERS: A record of the Port Arthur Seminar’, 11-12 March, 1997, Melbourne, Victoria (ISBN 0642271364) clearly shows the incident that rocked a nation was planned.
    .
    In his 16 page, disturbing 1997 paper, Senator Parry stated in the following passage :
    .
    “I was particularly impressed by the quick response and initiatives by some of the team members in packaging and collecting equipment.
    .
    The response time and the amount of equipment quickly relocated was fantastic. One firm in particular, Nelson Brothers, had organised for an embalming machine box and a special large equipment case to be manufactured ready for the incident. These two containers were the envy of all embalmers and worked extremely well.
    .
    I would suggest that design specifications may be available from this firm for any future considerations by other firms.” (highlighted by CN)
    .
    Parry reveals the funeral services company of Nelson Brothers in Melbourne, Victoria, had undertaken preparations prior to the shooting.
    .
    According to Wikipedia:
    .
    “Parry was born on 31 October 1960 in Burnie, Tasmania, to William Stephen Parry and Patricia Dawn Evans. He was educated at Burnie’s Marist Regional College after which he enrolled at the Tasmanian Police Academy in Hobart.
    .
    Parry was employed as an officer with the Tasmanian Police from 1977 to 1986, and was promoted to Detective in 1983. After leaving the police force, he completed a certificate in Mortuary Science at the Australian College of Funeral Service, and was a funeral director from 1986 to 2004, becoming president of the Australian Funeral Directors Association. Parry was also president of the Burnie Chamber of Commerce and Industry from 2000 to 2004, and a director of the Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry from 2000 to 2005.”
    .
    In 2004, Parry was elected to the Australian Senate for the State of Tasmania as a member of the Liberal Party.
    .
    Senator Parry was eminently qualified to lead the embalming team and as such his published comments would have to be accurate.
    .
    On February 26 he was emailed a ‘Show Cause’ notice by Keith Noble who accused the Senate Leader of having prior knowledge of the tragedy.
    .
    As of going to print Mr Noble says he has had no acknowledgement or reply from senator Parry.
    .
    Cairns News emailed senator Parry’s office with a copy of the notice but he had not responded at the time of going to print……………..”
    .
    https://cairnsnews.org/2016/03/06/startling-new-information-proves-port-arthur-massacre-was-planned-by-government-2/

    Stephen Parry: Senate President to resign from Parliament after UK ….

    • Identical in every respect to the way in which the Po behave when pillaging legally owned and licensed firearms: if there was any such thing on the property the likelihood of it ever being returned would be virtually nilch.

      • I’ve got heaps of stories of cops making off with private property. Sometimes it is something small, like a can of Winchester 760 powder from an inspection of the safekeeping provisions (copper said, “I’m not sure if this is prohibited” and he took the can with him, obviously he was running low on 760) another time it was really ugly and the cops took a purse with $1,600 that was being saved for the baby shower. Scopes off rifles, ammunition, yadda, yadda.

        When you’re growing up you never imagine that the police could be the biggest liars and thieves in the room.

    • We do not have a Police Force or Police Service any more. We have a gang of thugs posing as police. Aren’t we proud to be Australians? No more! Is this what I and many others were sent to Vietnam for, to come home to this treasonous behaviour. O SHAME AUSRALIA!

      Someone once said “Hell on Earth”! We are now witnessing it.

  17. It will be interesting to hear what Bartolo has to say after that raid on his house. What? another BS ‘incitement’ charge? The police bust in his door, assault him, confiscate property – and charge HIM with a crime.

    These are the kinds of activities that lead to ‘blow-back’. The police need to chill out and become more reasonable, they used to try to deescalate situations, ramping up the violence is not going to end well.

  18. Meanwhile, after the CDC announced that of the 160,000 alleged Covid deaths in the U.S, with only 6% of them having ‘Covid only’ listed as the cause of death, the powers that be have gone into damage control and trotted out this bastard of an apologist once more to convince everyone that we’re still in apocalypse mode :

    • These clowns still don’t get it. There is no such thing as Covid-19. It has been proved statistically by Victorian deaths and there has not been a scientific study proving beyond doubt that Covid-19 exists. The so called tests have also been called out. Fraud! Fraud!

      You can’t have a new disease added to the already active health problems and come up with a lower number of deaths than is usual. It is just impossible. I have mentioned Victoria, but it has been reported that US deaths this year are 2% lower than each of the three previous years.

      To get their figures these professionals must think that a percentage of cancer and heart disease deaths went on holiday, worldwide for this year. Dream on!

  19. The video above is titled : ‘That CDC 6% COVID Death Rate, Explained’.

    Translated into regular English it means : ‘6% death rate explained using government double-speak and obfuscation’.

  21. That’s a pretty damning video you posted above Fish.

    Jon Rappoport has been banging on about the same things recently as well.
    ie: is there definitive proof that Covid-19 has been isolated and identified as a new and distinct virus ?

  22. My conclusions laid out above. There is no Covid-19. I am not medically trained but I have been making that statement for weeks. Just a little bit of research and common sense gave me the answer that professionals can’t or don’t want to grasp. Another part of the “great scam”?

    I have been calling the scam out since April and being criticised by people in my home town.

    I will sleep easy tonight.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.