Home News Covid Mysteries Part 3: Big Pharma, Big Government and The Herd of...

Covid Mysteries Part 3: Big Pharma, Big Government and The Herd of Elephants In The Room

33
(L) Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla (source wcoinsw.com)
by PG
Big Pharma – Data, Testing and Trust
  1. Why should we trust vaccine manufacturers, who have one goal which is to make money ($ tens of billions every year from the booster shots alone) and who have for the past several decades had complete and absolute prosecutorial immunity against being sued?
2. Why would we trust Big Pharma, given the plethora of past and current lawsuits against them – including a record-breaking $ 2.3-billion fine for fraud against Pfizer in 2009 – the largest in Pharma history? … only to be outdone by GlaxoSmithKline three years later with a $ 3-billion fine for fraud allegations and failure to report safety data?
 
3. Why are vaccinated people not told that vaccine trials indicate that there is a chance that the vaccine can penetrate the endothelial layer and the blood brain barrier causing neurological damage, and why is there A LACK OF INFORMED CONSENT provided before being vaxxed?
 
4. Why is it that the four major vaccine companies have denied that graphene oxide is used in their vaccines, yet a very comprehensive study conducted in Sept 2021 unambiguously and categorically showed that the major vaccines DO contain graphene oxide?
 
5. Why is it that there is no MSM publicity surrounding the findings from the mid-Sept 2021 Corona Committee Conference from 35 groups from across the US, the UK, Austria and Japan that looked at hundreds of samples from three of the vaccine manufacturers, finding sharp metal objects, graphene fragments, and non-biological (inorganic) material – that “have no business being in a vaccine” according to the researchers?
 
6. Why does there seem to be a media blackout on the fact that a group of lawyers, medical professionals and activists have asked members of the Polish parliament and Senate to organise an urgent investigation into the allegations of numerous whistle-blowers who have claimed that Pfizer was performing testing on 6-month-old orphan babies as part of their experiments?
 
7. Why is there not an outcry over the fact that 2,300 private emails from Dr. Anthony Fauci and various agencies and Big Tech reps (including Mark Zuckerberg) are alleged to reveal that:
 
Hydroxychloroquine is effective against Covid
Masks are useless against Covid
Fauci was talking to Big Tech about censorship of cures for Covid
Fauci makes a small fortune from the funding, vaccine research and patent ownership from the vaccines.
Covid was man-made in a lab
Fauci’s ‘gain of function’ research funded it, a practice that is illegal in the US because of the significant risks that it poses.
Why are we not being told that taking Covid mRNA vaccines, according to an increasing number of studies (despite the wave of denial to the contrary by Big Pharma) is resulting in an accelerated rate of Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), INCREASING the likelihood of developing illness from new Covid strains where those vaxxed are showing an increased risk of vaccine failure / covid infections requiring hospitalization?
 
8. Why were there ZERO studies conducted on the vaccines to show the effect that they would have regarding:-

 

  • Toxicity
  • Genotoxicity
  • Carcinogenicity
  • Auto immune diseases
  • Other drugs being taken?
 
9. Why do documents from Moderna show that in just three months after roll-out, their internal reporting systems part way through the pandemic had recorded a staggering 300,000 adverse reactions to the jab, multiple times the figures contained within the VAERS database?
 
10. Why did the FDA not address the manipulations and violations from Pfizer regarding the protocol surrounding the testing of children after it submitted its review prior to approval, according to Dr. Yaffa Shir-Raz, a risk-communication researcher and a teaching fellow in the University of Haifa, Israel?
 
(She reported that the conventional Phase 3 part of the trial that normally lasts between 1 to 4-years was completed in only 30-days; and at least four of the children in the study [a significantly high number at 0.4%] suffered from serious adverse events – that is, events in which at least one criterion was met: caused death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect?)
 
10. Ivermectin – the herd of elephants in the room
  1. Why is there widespread negative publicity by the authorities stating that Ivermectin is ineffective, unsafe, unproven, without peer reviewed studies in the fight against Covid, when in fact:
  • There have been at least 42 peer reviewed studies on Ivermectin
  • It is as safe or safer than paracetamol
  • It has won a Nobel Prize
  • It has seen 3.7-billion doses administered worldwide
  • It has been used very extensively and successfully in the fight against Covid – in India, El Salvador, and around 30 other countries?
  • It has been shown to reduce mortality anywhere between 65 % to 85% in the majority of studies, depending principally on how soon it is administered to Covid patients?
 
2. Why have we not been told that the countries in Africa that have been using Ivermectin have 7 x less morbidity and 8 x less mortality from Covid compared to nations that do not?
 
3. Why, if vaccines are effective, is it the case that the countries that are highly vaccinated like Israel (who experienced a surge in cases upon the rollout of the third [booster] shot) have multiple times the cases of Covid compared to Uttar Pradesh’s province of 241-million inhabitants that used Ivermectin along with some other inexpensive drugs in a widespread program that resulted in complete eradication of Covid in most of its regions?
 
4. Why have we constantly been told that Ivermectin is ineffective against Covid (where ‘evidence’ that cites poorly conducted, non-peer reviewed studies is used) when the amount of evidence – peer reviewed and otherwise to the contrary is simply overwhelmingly without equal?
 
(For evidence regarding why Ivermectin works there is a paper by a retired Australian doctor called Dr. Robyn Stephenson called “It is Dangerous to Suggest that Early Treatment for Covid-19 is Unsafe ”published by The Canberra Declaration who spent 6-months performing research into Covid, citing 119 sources, on all things Covid. In my opinion this is literally in the top 0.1% of best research papers that I have come across on any topic).
 
5. Why, if Ivermectin is as effective in the fight against Covid as the abundant amount of (non-Big-Pharma linked) research suggests, have the TGA banned it? And why does the TGA both investigate, deregister and fine doctors with a risk of imprisonment if they prescribe Ivermectin to patients within Australia?
 
6. Why did the head of Merck, Sharpe & Dorne – the inventor of Ivermectin, advise against Ivermectin’s use in the treatment of Covid via this very inexpensive off-patent drug, (just before landing a $ 1.2-billion government contract for the supply of an expensive drug used to fight Covid)?
 
7. Why was it that as soon as Ivermectin was being touted as a cure for Covid, more than 200 scientific studies appeared [many with Big Pharma linked funding] warning us of its dangers and lambasting those who were being hospitalised for taking the horse-worming versions [despite having no evidence from either hospitals or people that this was happening])?
 
8. Why was it not publicised by the MSM that the Indian Bar Association is suing Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, chief scientist of the WHO, for supposedly deliberately ignoring and suppressing the FLCCC and the BIRD Panel’s data regarding the effectiveness of the drug Ivermectin, with an intent to dissuade the people of India from using Ivermectin?
 
9. Why is it, if Ivermectin is unsafe and ineffective against Covid, is it being given to select (vaxxed) Covid patients in some Australian hospitals?
 
 
10. Why is it that the Australian government has banned Ivermectin when the evidence relating to its safe and effective use against Covid is breathtaking, covering the following types of studies and trials – which almost all show moderate to significant efficacy in the fight against Covid
  1. Randomized Clinical Studies
  2. Observational Clinical Studies
  3. Epidemiologic Studies
  4. In-vitro studies
  5. In vivo studies
  6. In-silico studies
  7. Clinical, Pharmacologic observations / experience
  8. Observational control trials
  9. Meta analysis of randomised control trials
  10. Observational and randomised trials?
 
11. Why do the Western nations of the world in particular take no notice of the fact that Uttar Pradesh in India has practically eradicated Covid whilst by comparison the Indian state of Kadesh who are not using Ivermectin has a Covid case rate of more than 1000 x that of Uttar Pradesh?
 
11. Government Policy and politics
  1. Why is it that members of a growing number of countries, including Poland (a previously Communist country) are protesting against the claimed overreaches of the Police in Victoria against protestors (notwithstanding the fact that some protesters were doing the wrong thing), outside the Australian Embassy in Warsaw, Poland, prompting the following statements:
The whole world sees what is happening in Australia. Australia has contracted Covid madness.
This is how totalitarianism is born, these are not conspiracy theories.”?
 
2. Why does there seem to be almost no concern nor criticism by the MSM and politicians in Australia regarding the draconian treatment of protesters in Victoria in particular who were shot in the back with rubber bullets while running away from Police, whilst others have been slammed head-first into the ground, encouraged by commanders who look forward to “cracking some skulls?”
 
3. Why is it that the governments of many countries, Australia in particular, are mandating severe, draconian lockdowns – that have been condemned for quite some time now by the WHO for leading to significant deprivations to both people’s and nation’s health and wellbeing?
 
4. Why is Australia focused on going down the lockdown route whenever there are numerous studies showing that lockdowns don’t work, including significant examples like Sweden which was infamous within Europe for having almost no lockdown, instead keeping schools, businesses and their economy open?
 
5. Why do the politicians in Australia and in NZ (who locked down the whole of the South Island despite having ZERO Covid cases, decimating the tourism industry in the process) choose to lock down their regions, despite the evidence from states like North Dakota and South Dakota that experienced near identical Covid statistics despite one state opening up and one state remaining locked down?
 
6. Why is it that governments mandate lockdowns to specific employment sectors (forcing many vaccine-hesitant people to lose their jobs and livelihoods in the process) whilst refusing to mandate vaccinations for themselves at both state and federal levels?
 
7. Why is it that many hundreds of thousands of frontline nurses and doctors around the world who worked extra shifts, around the clock with claustrophobic, ill-fitting, physically bruising PPE during the worst of the pandemic are being rewarded by their governments with the loss of their job for not taking the jab, in turn straining health systems?
 
8. Why are governments mandating vaccines for those who have recovered from Covid when the real-life data is increasingly showing us that taking the vaccine for this naturally immune group of people actually INCREASES the chance of catching Covid?
 
9. Why are we quarantining the healthy in the midst of this ‘pandemic’, causing immunological experts to be horrified, when this has NEVER been done during viral outbreaks or pandemics where historically only the sick have ever been quarantined?
 
10. Why are many states and countries mandating jabs for people who have already recovered from Covid, when the data shows us that covid-recovered persons are 13 x less likely than vaxxed persons to develop Covid, and are at almost zero risk of serious injury or death post-Covid recovery?
 
And why are we mandating the vaccination of Covid-recovered persons when Pfizer scientists were filmed undercover admitting that natural antibodies are better than the vaccinations in the protection against Covid?
 
11. Why has the government of Australia continued with their current severe lockdown policies, at a cost of approximately $200-million for each death to date, plus immeasurable additional costs regarding social, mental, physical, community and economic aspects that will be experienced for many years to come?
 
12. Why does the Australian government seem to be indifferent to the fact that an increasing number of US politicians are calling out Australia on its blatant human rights violations, in Victoria at least – being administered under the guide of paradoxically ‘keeping people safe’ during the longest locked down city in the world?
 
And why are some US representatives almost unthinkably calling for Australian boycotts as a result of the human rights violations experienced within Australia which have ignominiously resulted in them labelling Australia “Apartheid Australia: Hell on earth.”?
 
13. Why has AHPRA silenced health practitioners from raising concerns about what they call the experimental gene therapy (called Covid-19 vaccine); and why has AHPRA dismissed some seasoned health practitioners and threatened others with fines for raising genuine concerns that have been counter to AHPRA’s prescribed narrative?
 
14. Why is it, given that Covid ranks well outside the top-20 causes of death and that the $ 300-billion (and growing) cost, merits state governments implementing the harshest lockdowns in the world and shutting down significant aspects of the economy?
 
15. Why is it that Australians who have emigrated from Communist / Marxist countries seem to be the first to claim that Australia has become fascist in our governmental approach, making many comparisons to Germany in 1937?
 
16. Why would we trust Dr. Fauci with one of the most influential positions within America at this time, as he assists in formulating pandemic response policy, given that he is infamously on the record for constantly contradicting his own advice on numerous occasions?
 
17. Why has there not been calls for a major investigation into the claim by the SALK Institute in San Diego – the premier global research institute on vaccines, that the spike proteins in the mRNA vaccines were found to be pathogenic during testing? The institute claimed that THE VACCINES ARE CAUSING THE DISEASE, and that they damage cells and cause vascular disease even without a virus, a claim that is being espoused by a growing number of immunologists and epidemiologists?
 
18. Why is it that there has been an almost complete media blackout regarding multiple, recent courts cases against the government-mandated lockdowns, unfair dismissals regarding the jab, and alleged multiple breaches of human rights abuses – such as the claim by G&B Lawyers that a total of 13 individual rights and freedoms are being infringed by NSW public health orders?
 
19. Why are few people aware that Jack Ma (China’s richest man) and TikTok (the Beijing-owned social media site) were each reported to having donated over $ 3 million AUD to Melbourne’s Doherty Institute vaccine research – the body that the government relies upon for clinical, research and public health advice within Australia regarding the COVID-19 response?
 
20. Why does the government data relating to the number of injuries and deaths keep moving up and down on the Australian TGA website, along with categories being changed; and why on the US VAERS website did independent analysts report the deletion of some 150,000 adverse reaction records thereby reducing the number of vaxxed injuries along with countless other examples of specific VAERS case numbers being altered?
 
21. Why is it the case that in the recent 8-hour review panel before the FDA a group of scientific researchers claimed that, based upon the VAERS data, for every life that the vaccine saved from Covid it killed two people, or up to five people killed for every life saved based upon other data; and why did the CDC go ahead and approve the vaccine after this anyway?
 
22. Why is it not well known that in cities such as Melbourne The Rockefeller Foundation (linked directly to Big Pharma) and the United Nations have multiple networks in place that deal directly with city Mayors and leaders of LG municipalities, that bypass red tape and constitutional governance at state or national levels, enabling the deployment of overseas troops in emergency situations – as is allegedly the case in Australia during the Covid crisis?
 
12. Other
  1. Why did the CDC change its definition of Covid reporting guidelines just prior to the pandemic, resulting in 16.7 x higher number of deaths than there would have been under the previous reporting guidelines?
  2. Why is Remdesivir being prescribed by AHPRA in Australia and by the FDA in the US as part of the recommended treatment protocol whenever a previous trial with Remdesivir saw it kill so many people that it was withdrawn from the trial?
3. And again, why is it being prescribed when in June 2020 a trial was published involving 61 patients with Covid-19 who were given a 10-day course of Remdesivir that ultimately resulted in 23% of them suffering serious adverse events – most commonly serious multiple-organ-dysfunction syndrome, septic shock, acute kidney injury, and hypotension?
 
4. Why, if the vax is so safe, are a significant number of people, most of whom are well informed from a wide variety of sources, not taking it (including the largest group of vaccine-informed groups being those with PhDs), instead choosing to imperil their livelihood, careers, and even reputations?
 
5. Why are we not informed that there is a reduction in the capability of the immune system against other types of diseases with each successive jab that is taken, making the body more susceptible to picking up other infections?
 
6. Why has virtually no mention been made of the fact that within the European database of 420-million people there is an unparalleled level of detail showing that the total deaths during the Covid wave in 2020 coincided almost identically with the flu season of 2017/2018 and that the total deaths during the Covid 2020 wave were practically identical to long term total deaths trendlines in Europe for prior years?
 
7. Why, if vaccines are safe, did Project Veritas release in their undercover expose of a Johnson & Johnson scientist called Justin Durrant who said, “Don’t get the Johnson & Johnson [COVID vaccine], I didn’t tell you though.”
 
8. Why do we not believe that there could be a possibility that the $36,000 offered to US hospitals for Covid deaths could be an incentive for them to record deaths as Covid when they might not be, resulting in an inflation of the actual numbers?
 
9. Why is it that if the vaccines are safe, that in just my personal orbit of acquaintances and their acquaintances in Australia we can together list 10-people who we know personally between us who have died within a month, most within days, of taking either the first or second vax – as follows:
  • A good friend of mine and her friend know of three deaths – all dead within several days of taking the vax, no co-morbidities: i) A healthy mother in her 50’s, ii) a 51 year-old mother, healthy – literally dropped dead in a work meeting in front of her distressed colleagues, iii) a fit 71 year old man who started bleeding from multiple places over his body. Dead several days later.
  • Another close friend of mine was furnished with information regarding four deaths from a close friend and trusted source in a NSW country town, all within days of taking the vax.
  • An ambulance officer on the front line (now out of work for not taking the vax) knows of three deaths – one of whom was a very fit 44 year-old medical professional (whose name I know but will not disclose for purposes of anonymity), dead within days of taking the jab?
(Based upon my discussions with these sources it is most unlikely that most, if any, of these deaths will be recorded on the official TGA website as vaccine related deaths? We suspect this since this is what many dozens of whistle-blowers in the US and Australia are telling us).
 
10. Why is it that if the vaccines are safe that a study claims that 12% of people in the US know of someone who has died after taking the vaccine?
 
11. Why are there countless deaths recorded as Covid deaths whenever they have nothing at all to do with Covid, aside from the fact that they died WITH Covid; for example, media headlines such as these have been reported “Man who died after falling from a 10-foot ladder was actually killed by Covid:doctors”, or “Man dies from Covid after being shot dead.”?
 
12. Why is there not greater consideration being given to the wellbeing of teenagers who are self-harming at record rates, with at least 40 teenagers rushed to hospital in New South Wales for self-harm every day, exacerbated by the lockdown restrictions, with various states in Australia beating previous helpline call records?
 
13. Why does the ex-Premier of NSW, Gladys Berejiklian, and other politicians consistently mention phrases like “I certainly wouldn’t want to be in the same room as an unvaccinated person,” if the vaccines are meant to provide protection against Covid?
 
14. Why is it that the Red Cross in the US has recently announced that it is not accepting plasma donated from vaccinated people (although it is still accepting blood)?
 
15. Why is it that, according to PANDA (Pandemic Data and Analytics) when we stop to reflect on things at this point in time regarding all things Covid that it would appear that ALMOST ALL of the policies in many countries regarding their pandemic response are the exact OPPOSITE of what might be considered rational in the bid to save lives?
 
13. Wrap up
 
I fully appreciate that much of the information in this document will probably be new, given that it will COMPLETELY CONTRADICT the mainstream media, government policies and so-called expert advisory bodies.
 
All that I would ask you to do is to perhaps stand back and do your best to look at the data/evidence by somehow finding independent sources and make your mind up from there.
I will end by asking three questions:
  1. Should we trust governments to ‘just do their job’ in terms of making and enforcing their Covid-related orders without question because they know best?
  2. Or is there something more that we should be doing to shout this message from the rooftops, if indeed we believe that we have a crisis on our hands?
  3. And if so, what might each of us personally do?
I’d like to give the penultimate opportunity to ‘speak’ to Prof. Vernon Coleman, an international bestselling author and retired medical doctor. He is an acknowledged expert on drug and vaccine adverse events. He is not one to exaggerate; his predictions regarding the evolution of the Covid crisis have so far come to pass with chilling accuracy. In a prior video he literally broke down in uncontrollable sobs at one point when he reflected upon the path that humanity was embarking on in terms of the global vaccine rollout at a breakneck pace:
 
Given that today is a significant milestone birthday for me (the Big ½-Century) I’d like to perhaps indulge in a little humour given the darkness of this topic by giving the last word to Little Suzie, a made-up character of sorts, who with a broad smile on her face holds a TV screen in one hand that she has smashed with a hammer in her other hand, with the following caption: “And just like that … little Suzie cured the worst virus of all.”
 
14. Critical Information Sources – please watch if you can
 
There are many hundreds of high-quality information pieces that I could list here – none of which you will find in the MSM or amongst government sources.
 
But if you’ve managed to make it this far – well done and thank you. I appreciate that this will not have been a light and easy read.
 
However, if you could spare the time I would very highly recommend listening to these videos or transcripts – perhaps even just the shorter ones, which will help to fill in many of the gaps that I have not been able to complete in the space available here.
 
Note that search engines like Google will typically sensor anything that questions the use of vaccines and YouTube have publicly admitted that they will remove any content that speaks out against vaccination, so you might for example have to do some digging in the ether for the required information by using a web browser such as DuckDuckGo. And of course if you search for these articles, below, you will quite likely be met with the all-knowing Fact-checkers (many of which have direct or indirect ties into Big-Pharma) that will claim to debunk some of these videos).
 
1. Project Veritas Undercover cameras with Pfizer corporation. 10-minute YouTube video plus various alternative news articles where Pfizer Scientists claim that natural [COVID] Antibodies Are Better Than The [Pfizer] Vaccination.
 
2. How Rockefeller Founded Big Pharma And Waged War On Natural Cures. 3-minutes, very insightful
 
3. Microscopic examination of vaccines by Dr. Carrie Madej on Stew Peters show on Rumble. 16-minutes; both surreal and disturbing.
 
(I will admit that I have not had an opportunity to examine this in detail; however, others have seen similar things under the microscope, so I think this is probably genuine, although I hope that it is not).
 
4. 2030 unmasked documentary: 2-hours long, EXCEPTIONALLY INSIGHTFUL, pulling back the curtains into the worlds that are purposely kept from us.
 
To save a little time you could perhaps skip the first 20-minutes and the last 5-minutes. Can be played at double speed.
 
5. Revealing Covid. 1-hour presentation by a retired doctor. Exceptionally insightful, useful and informative. Link: Revealing Covid – Condensed Edition (rumble.com)
SHARE

33 COMMENTS

  1. ☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️
    NOTE SIX Plus min mark on what is happening in Western Australia.

    X22report.com. Report 2620.

    WA has practically no covid, large % injected BUT HOSPITALS FILLING UP AND THE PREMIER HAS NO EXPLANATION.
    ☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️💁🙈🙉🙊⚖️
    Another ‘WHY’???? 💁

    • Oh, come on. We’ve been discussing the jabs and what they are really about for more than a year and a half. There were a few months back when it all started that we were trying to sort things out, but after about 3-4 months enough dots connected that we knew what was going on. After that it was just refining the information.

      If a ‘well informed’ member of the government with lots of access to information hasn’t got a clue at this point, I’m calling bullshit. They’re just doing what they specialize in – lying.

      • They have to lie because they are blackmailed, compromised or bribed.
        Silly me, no they do not have to lie, they can resign, that would be their duty.
        Better still, they can swim to NZ to join their mates there…… hope they make it, of course.
        To assist and encourage them, we just ignore them, do not associate with scum and show them our bum.
        ‘Ditto’ to the mass media and their prostituted spivs. Black ball their advertisers. We are 99% they are nothing.

    • Ned, the hospitals are filling up because the public refuse to pay the fees the G.P.’s demand. Given that the majority of medical facilities these days are run by Corporations, and refuse to bill Medicare demand cash payment for each visit. So folks line up at the hospitals where the bill goes to Medicare. THAT’S why the hospitals are filling up.

    • “The hospital system in Western Australia is being overwhelmed”:
      X22 Report Published November 5, 2021
      https://rumble.com/vos52t-ep.-2620b-those-who-are-blind-will-soon-see-the-light-one-step-at-a-time.html

      And a closer look indicates that a shutdown backlash – as opposed to some consciously nutted out strategy – has been a major driver

      First there was the destruction of small businesses in March 2020 and the proportion of the workforce that was otherwise made redundant for 6 months thereafter: a significant number of people would, very obviously, have been unable to maintain the private healthcare cover they had previously been able to afford

      A backlog/bottleneck demand on both public and private systems was inevitable due to the fact that no one who’d planned to undergo medical procedures overseas would have been able to do so

      Over and above which the system has been getting increasingly more inadequate since the early 2000s.

  2. We need to establish pirate media in order to bypass the MSM. It was done in the 1960s when censorship was not as bad as today. During the Vietnam War years, it was startlingly successful.

    What I don’t get is that there are thousands of techies out there who could be running internet TV and Radio and yet not one has used his skills for humanity. Or even to save his family and country.

    There are hundreds of printing presses sitting in the dust of warehouses. Why is no printer getting together with fund raisers and distributors and spreading the truth?

    I can tell you. They are only interested in Chrisitian evangelism, Trotskyite proselytising, and product advertising.

    In Oz, we have Gumshoe and the Cairns News. Whatever happened to the Bronzed Anzacs? the people with Aussie Ingenuity? the cynical independent thinkers of the Lucky Country? (Donald Horne WAS being sarcastic yet 99% of Ausies think the appellation is real).

    What a sad country. Americans, who also believed the myth, cannot understand why we are taking this shit. Can it be that we are natural fascists? Is this the enduring legacy of the British Raj?

    Maybe so. I have noticed that every brave resistance fighter is an immigrant.

    • Quote, “Whatever happened to the Bronzed Anzacs? the people with Aussie Ingenuity?” Unquote. L.O.L. They are all dead and buried, turning over in their graves, to realise their offspring are unable to utilise their brains and everything they died for, was pointless.

  3. My fave:

    “Why are we not informed that there is a reduction in the capability of the immune system against other types of diseases with each successive jab that is taken, making the body more susceptible to picking up other infections?”

    But I like thissa one too: “Or is there something more that we should be doing to shoot from the rooftops?”

    Best of all I like the title: “Government and the Herd of Elephants in the Room.”

  4. Personally I like this line best:
    22. Why is it not well known that in cities such as Melbourne The Rockefeller Foundation (linked directly to Big Pharma) and the United Nations have multiple networks in place that deal directly with city Mayors and leaders of LG municipalities, that bypass red tape and constitutional governance at state or national levels, enabling the deployment of overseas troops in emergency situations – as is allegedly the case in Australia during the Covid crisis?

    In Melbourne down at the west end of the city grid they have a thing on the river called “World Trade Centre” probably built around 1980 and the view down the river from there is to the Bolte Bridge which went in early 2000’s from memory. The Bolte Bridge has an architectural feature of two very tall square blank columns, they have no structural function, they are basically an echo of the NY WTC but standing out there in the old harbour.

    • I think there was some controversy to this building as it actually stuck out into the river partly blocking it and also the view, I think it was that same building. It’s an area of Melbourne with a difficult history near the site of the old John Batman’s hill where the original founder had his house on top surveying the village he had created, however the Crown flattened the hill and put Spencer St station on top. The old station was an iconic 60’s sort of design with a cafeteria upstairs which was like going into a time warp. The whole lot demolished for the Victorian Labour Party’s newfound obsession with railways, from Steve Bracks through to Dicktator Dan, remember what they used to say about Mussolini, “He made the trains run on time”. Steve Bracks (October 1999 – July 2007) hit the road, couldn’t get out quick enough, said his son was on drugs so he had to quit. Bang! Gone. I wonder what the other reasons might have been.

  5. I have just returned home from spending the night in an Emergency department of a large Hospital North of Perth, W.A. My issue was a burst blood vessel inside my nose that wouldn’t stop bleeding. Anyway, the patient admittance room was full, did not see anyone wearing a mask. I was dropping blood all over the place, staff were not concerned at all, patients were freaking out though. Eventually the nurse in charge noticed the reaction of everyone else waiting to be attended to, by my bleeding, and decided might be a good idea to allow me thru to the emergency treatment area. After sitting there for nearly THREE HOURS and going thru one large box of tissues, and blood all over the bed, I asked a passing nurse, (who had passed me numerous times) when I was going to be looked at. Within 10 minutes a Dr turned up, and began asking questions. He openly told me he had never had any experiences with my issue, but was aware of text book procedure for it. He would go thru step by step. Anyway, eventually he reached the second last option, which was what he called a TAMPON shove up my nose. The thing was similar to tampon, but could be inflated at either end, putting pressure on the vein where it was leaking. So up it went, then the waiting began. THREE hours later, checked me out again, bleeding had slowed down considerbly, but he was still not satisified. told me going to keep me in for observation over night. Another 2 hrs passed, and was told no beds available, will need to spend the night in the emergency dept cubicle wearing my blood stained clothing. Bright lights all night and excessive noise as well. At 0100 hrs, a young lady comes in and gives me paper work with the cost thereon for the night which was passed onto D.V.A. would you believe, $1200 for the night, without a shower or proper meal and bed ? The thing I found rather strange for a hospital, no one showed any concern for my blood dripping all over the place, even the Dr’s. Also no one seemed to be concerned with the alleged COVID bullshit either. It seemed to me, the majority of patients there, were there simply so they didn’t have to fork out for the cost of a visit to the G.P. That’s why our hospitals are so stretched out.

    • If your blood doesn’t clot it’s normally because of the hypertension pills but also you are probably low on vitamin K which is most available in watercress, you need to eat watercress regularly just like they all did everywhere before ww2. They even had a dedicated “watercress line” bringing it in to London but it was shut down after ww2 when everyone switched to white bread and junk food. To stop your nose bleeding you can make a tourniquet simply by squeezing the bridge of your nose, the veins are in there.
      Personally I would like to get off the medicare system which takes 2% of my gross income. Over 50 years of work this would be a full year of work to pay medicare. I want to be totally exempt and if I want pharmaceuticals I would prefer to buy them direct from the chemist, as anyone can in various Asian places where Rockerfellas’ BigPharma and HospitalSystem has not taken over. The whole system is a useless black hole for money and designed to self destruct. Pharmacists know what the pills are and there are plenty of pharmacists. There is no attempt to transfer simple stuff to the internet except for the appointments. It’s hard to imagine any industry that operates in such a jumble. The “system” is inane and insane.
      Greg Hunt (Minster for Health) and John Skerritt (TGA) are at the top.

      • Thanks for the heads up W3, but the method espoused for stopping blood noses, does not work with me, can press my nose until I faint, it still bleeds. Even the Dr’s are stumped. Only way to stop it is cauterisation. Then I have to watch out for the scabs, if they come off to early, we’re back to square 1. I had my last cauterisation 10 yrs ago, not a drop since, until not. Spent 6 years in the military, in N.Q. Vietnam, Singapore, Malaya, no nose bleeds all that time. Discharge and return to W.A. with 11 months, nose bleeds returned. Maybe I should have got discharged in N.Q. but I found the folks up there rather ODD, despite marrying one. L.O.L.

    • People so old should lose their fear of death but instead it seems to be augmented.
      A simple antidote for this nonsense is perhaps the Amish video from a few days ago.

    • Fair dinkum…Noam Chomsky was the darling of the chattering classes until, a decade ago, it was realised that despite his famous lectures on democracy, he did not actually know what democracy was.

      THis was a time when thinkers were realising the role of Israel in propagating war and assassinating truth tellers and pro-democracy analysts. I’ve been banned from GlobalResearch.com ever since, but I accused Chomsky of being a Zionist and a shill. I gather a lot of others drew the same conclusion. Anyway, he is now read only by high school graduates and first year uni students.

    • Dead right Tonyryan43. I too used to read his works but discovered very early on, he was two faced, and contradicted much of what he claimed he believed. He also would never, ever take the Academia to task, knowing which side his bread is buttered on. Typical Jewish American.

    • • Once a Zionist, Always a Zionist: Noam Chomsky Supports Us Occupation Of Syria To Protect ‘Israeli’-Aligned Kurdish Terrorists
      – Jonathan Azaziah – Fort Russ October 5, 2018

      https://fort-russ.com/2018/10/once-a-zionist-always-a-zionist-noam-chomsky-supports-us-occupation-of-syria-to-protect-israeli-aligned-kurdish-terrorists/

      […]
      “On 9/11, he insanely declares, “But even if the claims of an inside job were true, which is extremely unlikely, who cares? I mean, it doesn’t have any significance.” “

      From that particular hyperlinked article …

      “… some choice Chomsky quotes:

      Whether [Islamic terrorists] were involved or not nobody knows. It really doesn’t matter much. (An Evening with Noam Chomsky: The War on Terror. MIT 10/18/2001)

      Yet he admits “The evidence (against al-Qaida) is surprisingly thin.” (Noam Chomsky, 9/11)

      But even if (inside job) were true, which is extremely unlikely, who cares? I mean, it doesn’t have any significance. (Noam Chomsky on 911 conspiracy part 2, YouTube).”

      … Gatekeeper.

  6. Perhaps it’s time everyone ignored people like Chompsky. The guy served his purpose and helped keep this world on the welcome side of Hell so it’s now time to say thanks – now flick off, CUinNT. Grab your Four Horsehitmen and double jab yourselves to your black heart’s content.
    The rest of us can rest easy because the guy may be of Jewish decent, as if that matters, but when his toes turn up he’s going to have to deal with the universal religion’s consequences and have Osiris weigh his heart … with the Gobbler ready and waiting in the wings.

  7. Doherty Institute is a subsidiary of Pirbright/Wellcome Trust WHO with Tavistock control the eugenicists vaxxxine industry now enforcing global genocide in ‘western’ nations.
    SERCO owns OZ government and most production developed here past decade, together with Pig Pharma they are executing genocidal program of population reduction and trancehumanism based on eugenics, narcissism, psychopathy and pedophilia. They control msm, with mandates pushing lockdowns, face nappies, vaxxxes and digital passports via jabs. Now they are building the digital data surveillance command centre at Gore Hill, former ABC, for the trance-formation of Australia into krown kabal komunist dystopian hell rule by oligarchs enforcing COVID/DIVOC neo-feudal slavery, started eighteen months ago.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.