by Mary W Maxwell, LLB
Somebody should arrest me for contempt of court.
There are times when a person is sent to jail for contempt of court because, for example, he refuses to cough up information that is vital to a case (and has no Fifth Amendment right to silence, as he is not charged with a crime). He must sit there until he’s good and ready to do what the judge rightfully demands.
Or he is jailed for contempt for being insulting to the judge (which is known, correctly, as being insulting to the Court.) He can sit there until he regrets what he said and agrees that the Court deserves respect. Then he can go home.
If I were jailed for contempt of court, I don’t see how I would ever get out. There would be nothing I could do to end my feeling of contempt. There would be something they could do to end it. That is, the judges could start doing justice again.
My contempt for the court is new. Until quite recently I thought the court was the living end, as we used to say. One can see in the written law that there is every possibility of making justice happen.
Whether it be the common law (case judgments accumulated over the centuries), statutory law (enacted by parliaments), or the court of equity (which urges the judge to go out on a limb for the plaintiff), you will always find a remedy.
What great minds came up with the maxims! These three will suffice to give the gist:
The law speaks to all in the same way.
The reason of the law is the life of the law.
He who spares the guilty punishes the innocent.
Sadness in Australia
Note: In this article, I will not discuss the three cases that I filed, pro se, in recent years – Maxwell v Trump, 2017; Maxwell v FBI et al, 2019; and Maxwell v Secretary of Defense, et al, 2020. Those are not the cause of my contempt of court.
Maybe contempt is not the right word anyway. It is more like discouragement or sadness. Of course it approaches anger if someone I know has been the recipient of court cruelty. But in such an instance, I feel that the judge is a plain criminal and that charges should be brought.
There are many cases in both the US and Australia where the judge, in a child protection case, is involved in the crime of child trafficking. He (or she!) is at the very least an accessory or an accomplice. How’s that for shocking!
At GumshoeNews.com, editor Dee McLachlan has written many reports of what is happening in the Family Court and in the entity known as a Children’s Court which is not a genuine court but an administrative arm of the state police and the Child Kidnapping Service. Oops sorry, the Child Protection Service, the CPS.
Due process is skirted around (often with a snicker); the normal rules of evidence are officially dispensed with; and the state law regarding the rights of the child is violated. How so? The representative of the CPS, at a court hearing or “trial” is called The Crown Prosecutor. She and the judge confer – sometimes blatantly in the hallway. It’s like one big ex parte party.
Enter, a Good Judge
I have published a book entitled Reunion: Judging the Family Court. Where possible, I included happy stories. One such happy story involved a young judge in the Iowa district court, Adam Sauer. He refused to accept the testimony of a CPS social worker, Ms Chelsea Gray, age 30, in regard to the (unnecessary) placing of four siblings in foster care.
An agent for the Division of Criminal Investigation, Scott Reger, signed the affidavit outlining how Ms Gray had given false testimony under oath. Per newsobserver.com, Reger lists three counts of perjury:
- She testified at a hearing that she had spoken with their teachers about academic and social concerns the kids were exhibiting at school. Later she admitted that she had not spoken to teachers.
- She testified that she went to the foster home to check on the children once a month, as required by law, but later admitted she did not visit them.
- She testified that she would recommend a foster care placement keeping all four children in the same home, but it was found that she had in mind to separate one of the children from the other three.
I know that the reader is thinking “Oh yeah, so what?” Indeed I hope that’s what the reader is thinking. There shouldn’t be anything remarkable about a judge noticing perjury, or a perjurer getting convicted. Zzzz, boring.
Actually what is getting boring these days is the regularity of cases in which: A. a Protective parent seeks the court’s help over the horrific fact that the other parent is sexually abusing the child, and B. the judge awards custody of the child to the abuser.
Let’s ask why this is taking place. I have only two thoughts:
- The judges (and for that matter the social workers and police) may be under threat of death from a pedophile gang;
- Word may have come down from on high (wherever that is) that sexual activity with kids, in the home, is “trending” and judges should get the public conditioned to accept it.
In either case, the judge needs our assistance to stop this.
Judicial Treason, Type 2
I consider a judge to commit treason if he kills the people’s defensive weapon, the Constitution. That won’t be discussed n this article. The focus will be on what I label “Type-2 judicial treason.” Here the judge acts against the nation by knowingly causing violence to a person (other than when meting out lawful punishment, of course).
In Pennsylvania in 2011, Judge Mark Ciavarella of the Juvenile Court was convicted of racketeering for receiving money from the builders and owners of private prisons, to which he had sent young offenders. Well, that’s a better punishment than none at all, but he should have been up for treason “levying war against the people.”
Consider the treason committed by several judges in the leadup to the execution of Troy Davis of Savannah Georgia in 2011. It looked like an ordinary case. Troy was present at a party in Cloverdale, near which a man was drive-by shot. Troy was also in the parking lot of Burger King when off-duty cop McPhail was shot. Nine witnesses claimed to see him do it.
We have all heard of cops coercing testimony, especially in exchange for not pressing charges. Years later, 7 of the 9 recanted. That made them liable for perjury, so it was daring of them to do so. One of the non-recanting ones, Silvester Coles, is suspected of being the shooter but was never interrogated in any way, shape, or form.
Troy Davis — What the US Supreme Court Did
The accused, being on Death Row, had the right to appeal to the highest court. SCOTUS chose to send the recantation statements back to a Savannah judge, William Moore, for examination. Nothing wrong with that. But I claim that this judge “saw to it” that Troy would die.
I‘ll print below just the examination of Darrell Collins’ recantation. Darrell was age 16 on the night of the shooting of 27-year-old Officer McPhail (who was working as a security guard at Burger King). Troy Davis was 20.
Darrell Collins, said “After a couple of hours of the detectives yelling at me and threatening me, I finally broke down.” Collins is not to be confused with recanter Antoine Williams who said the officers “gave me a statement and told me to sign it. I signed it. I did not read it because I cannot read.”
Judge Moore’s Report for SCOTUS
Here is just one example of how the judge dealt with recantations – that of Darrell Collins. Comments in square brackets are mine, written angrily at the time. Troy was executed on September 21, a day for death in the occult calendar, which may or may not be relevant.
“Mr. Collins also told the police that Mr. Davis was responsible for the Cloverdale shooting, but recanted this testimony at trial. [Judge knows that Cooper the victim at Cloverdale said Troy didn’t shoot him.] …
“Specifically, he claims that he simply parroted what the police told him to say. [Indeed.] However, he did not recant his earlier testimony that Mr. Davis was wearing the white shirt on the night of the shootings. [Note: SCOTUS could allow Moore to have Collins clarify this matter now.]
“At the hearing, Mr. Collins did not recant his testimony regarding the white shirt. Instead, he testified that he presently had no memory of what color shirt Mr. Davis was wearing that night [I call that a recantation!] but would assume that whatever he told the police about the color of Mr. Davis’s shirt would have been a lie because all inculpatory testimony he provided is presumptively false in his mind. Of course, that statement is very different [No, it isn’t] from stating that, as a matter of his own knowledge, he is sure that he was lying.
“Mr. Collins’ testimony is neither credible nor a full recantation. [Shame on you, Judge] First, regardless of the recantation, Mr. Collins’s previous testimony, that has never been unequivocally recanted [I would say it has been “comprehensively recanted”, wouldn’t you?] still provides significant evidence of Mr. Davis’s guilt by placing him in the white shirt. [Excuse me, “significant?”? He said he lied.]
“Second, if Mr. Collins’s claim that he simply parroted false statements fed to him by police is truthful, query why Mr. Collins never directly identified Mr. Davis as Officer MacPhail’s murderer. Surely, this would have been the best available false testimony [Mother of God!]. … Third, there was credible testimony from Officer [!!] Sweeney and Mr. Lock [saying] that Mr. Collins’s testimony was not coerced.” — end of excerpts
Regulatory Capture and Copsuckery
Note: Donald E Wilkes, Jr, Emeritus Professor of Law at the University of Georgia offers the word ‘copsuckery’:
“I am concerned about the judge’s practice of methodically accepting the police versions of disputed events while simultaneously rejecting citizens’ versions of these events. This verges on what is called ‘copsuckery’ — slavish or excessive deference to law enforcement personnel – and may be another manifestation of regulatory capture in the criminal justice system, under which many judges view themselves not as protectors of the rights of citizens but as cheerleaders for police and prosecutors.”
The Lockdown – Any Type-2 Judicial Treason?
If ever there were a treasonous act in the United States – or any country – it is the Lockdown that is leading us to the Takeover. As far as I know, there has been very little response from the Courts to pleadings by citizens over various parts of the pandemic and the Lockdown.
At least one judge declared unconstitutional the Lockdown for the week prior to the date the legislature passed a relevant law. That was a help. My disappointment is not that cases have gone unanswered but that no judge is speaking out against the Takeover that will put an end to the US Constitution.
If a case is before them, and a judge botches it, that is proof (to me) of his/her across-the-board perfidy. They know what I mean. A judge or legal scholar can’t pick and choose. It’s all or nothing. You love the law. You kiss the law. You would not let law down.
Unlike a soldier or a cop who finds himself in a bind, having to obey orders that he does not agree with, the judge is not in a bind. She does not have to obey anyone but her conscience and the law.
Judex est lex loquens – the judge is the law speaking.
Right?
Mary, if you like, we can do a citizens arrest on you for contempt of court. We can definitely arrange. We can get your friend to film it, and it might go viral.
“Where does government begin?”
That question was posed at 18:22 minutes in a sermon delivered around 50 years ago:
So far as I’m concerned the ONLY way of busting loose from oppression is spelled out in the corresponding answer
Such an intelligent man, Berry. i resolved to phone hm and offer an argument but I see he died in 2017.
Wikpeda says Sproul was in a 1993 trainwreck of Amtrak in which 47 died but he survived.
About a decade or so ago the New Zealand government shut down for some reason, for about 6 months, and the place just kept running normally, so perhaps the ballot papers should have an option for government holiday one year (extended caretaker period with no new legislation) and come back next year to try to get elected again.
That R.C. Sproul bod is pretty much dead on. He almost could have adapted his speel from the philosophical discourse of St Thomas Aquinas (died about 1275 AD) on the topic of civil authority. Always before that, though, the Church had an official policy (not necessarily explained in a methodical, philosophical way) that was compliant with the Faith proposed to the World by the Apostles.
In my condensation of the matter: there is only one thing worse than tyranny and that is anarchy and autonomy. There are plenty of examples of tyranny and conquest being just results of a “perverse generation”.
However, it remains obligatory to “serve God rather than men” and that means to try to make civil authorities an instrument of Christ the King even if it is politically and economically “inconvenient” and even if it “hurts” in a physical way.
I am a mature law student and can assure you, the Constitutions in different countries around the world are not worth the paper they are written on anymore. I often question why I continue. The politicians are corrupt, [not news] and they speak about independence of the judiciary [no way] and Parliament will pass laws that guarantee only what is best for their side. Which happen to be ‘left’ with no ‘right’ opposition. The scales are tipped in their favour, before we even begin. The ‘liberal’ agenda. How come there are so many of these people? When and how did this happen? They re the majority and perhaps the dominion machines are not the only ones that have swung the votes for years around the world. Given the stranglehold of China that in 60 years has stealthily taken over key decision making organisations and governments, what hope is there? Child sex trafficking and slavery has been around for centuries and in certain countries it is the norm for parents to sell their own flesh and blood for a bowl of food. What laws exist in these countries to protect the children? Oh, they are there, but as I said, they are not worth the paper they are written on.
Whew! But please don’t quit law school.
“How come there are so many of these people? When and how did this happen?” Alexia, we try all the time at GumshoeNews.com to find the answer.
Consider just the fact hat people are queuing up like mad for the Covid vax. The mind boggles. Even when peeps hear that the vax is dangerous and the disease is easy to recover from. Aw, there must be a joke somewhere.
Alexia, I am a retired barrister of the Sydney bar. Here’s an article I wrote for Gumshoes that you may be interested in –
https://gumshoenews.com/2018/06/19/review-of-australian-law-and-its-decline/
Please feel free to make a copy for a few of your instructors – and also all the students you think can understand it. See if your instructors will discuss it with you – good luck.
This time I couldn’t even cry. (Still I realize I may be wrong about masks and everything else.)
the cases you have pointed out are not only for high crimes. There is a continuous fleecing of the average offender that is probably across the board. This goes all the way down to a minor infraction level. In a case that my ex-wife had initiated against me for a 2am drunk call, I was charged with malicious phone call, disorderly conduct AND a felony for demanding that i get my property back including my hand gun. The demand for my handgun is where they were able to come up with some charges related to a felony for threatening to take back my gun – i really had called to demand a ride home from the bar because i was drunk and was paying her car payment and insurance in exchange for occasional rides. Was it a malicious and disorderly phone call at an inconvenient time – yes, i was a complete jack A** with yelling, accusations and demands. The lower charges are what i agreed to in a plea and carry a combined max sentence of 2 weeks an a $250 fine. as part of my plea i agreed to a $2k fine, the max 2 weeks of weekenders in county jail and 120 hrs of community service. My plea acceptance and sentencing was postponed because judge Gilmore (larimer cnty Co) and the prosecutor (dont remember his name ~jan 2009) were being arrested for colluding and manufacturing evidence against a teen for rape and murder when there actually wasnt any evidence and was later discovered who the real killer was. So, i goto court for my plea acceptance – set up by a lawyer i paid for (another colluder) but under a new Prosecutor and judge. So the prosecutor reads the misdemeanor charges and then begin discussing the fines, community service and jail time. the judge interjects and advises the prosecutor to change the charges – he becomes confused. She explains to the prosecutor that i cant plead guilty to these offenses and be charged for felony fines and community service – although they were smart enough to keep the jail term in compliance with the sentencing guidelines. So my question is: how many phone yellers and jay walkers have accepted an illegal plea for exorbitant fines that are outside of the sentencing guidelines. i would suspect that the nuisance offender has paid trillions in excessive fines and this is just another example of the breakdown of checks and balances in our rotting system – sorry Mary, i to believe fully in rule of law and magna carta – i helped get it moving, by all means i get to go…
Thank you for that info, Kevx. Yes I can see how a bargain-pleader would offer more money than needed, to stay out of jail.
I often wonder what it will be that finally gets Gumshoe kicked off the air? An ethnic slur? A poke at judges? Or some small point of official’s behavior that nobody ever thought of.
do you FEEL i might consider restraining some of my commentary, and possibly some of the highlited details like the judges name in future opinions i write? this maybe be sound advice in the vein of ‘live to fight another day’!
KevX, Nuttin’ wrong with your naming a judge who has been arrested.
(Unless he is under 18.)
No question as to doubt that trivial offences are blown up out of all proportion whist heinous crimes, such as the cold-blooded murder of Joe Cinque, are written off as unfortunate mishaps.
In 2010 an Albany man was given a mere 10 year jail term for torturing and then murdering a 3 year-old boy. Even the, usually pedestrian, local paper ran a “what would it take to get 20?” headline. The issue is given some msm acknowledgment – albeit not nearly enough
I think it’s rooted in the fact that the governance of the Age is essentially gutless; incapable of attaining anything more than a faux sense of power by stomping on minor felons
The word ‘contempt’ isn’t strong enough to express my feelings.
Agree
Ms Dee McLachlan, I am citizen’s arresting you for being an accessory after the fact to the crime of impugning a puisne judge. You do not have to say anything, but whatever you say may be used against you in court. You are allowed one call to your solicitor. Here is a dime for that.
I base this action on the following maxims: “Culpa lato dolo aequiparatur.” and
“Lex citius tolerare vult privatum damnum quam publicum malum.”
Possibly also, as we used to say in Catholic school, “Semper ubi sub ubi.”
Oops, sorry, I just noticed that your offense is only a misdemeanor, not a felony, and therefore citizen’s arrest is not valid.
Oh well.
May I have my dime back please?
Sproul like most throughout history were in error regarding a correct understanding of Romans 13:1..
OK, John, let’s have your interpretation.
I have a question, Mary.
It has often occured to me that it is only a matter of time before Gumshoe is silenced. So, can you tell me what it would cost, and which is the preferred platform, to set up an alternative site… temporary or otherwise.
Good idea
Can someone else please advise Tony? I lack the skill.
My “presidential” website ConstitutionAndTruth.com cost around $250 originally. I think the renewal is only around $15pa. USD. ($23 AUD.)
My cancer website maryWmaxwell.com runs on year after year with Wix and they never ask me for money, though maybe a fairy godmother is paying for it. I’d like to get the fairy godmother to tell me the password, as I have never been able to get into the site to update it since 2014.
See what we’re dealing with, Tony? I know nuffink.
Dee made my website maxwellforsenate.com in 2017. She is a great boss, and an amazing artist. Like. Like. Like. (Tony, I do not know how to do Likes or Twitter and do not wish to learn.). Twit Twit Twit. Mary
LOL. Stay that way, Mary. The more people emerse themselves in IT the more illogical they become, and the less human is their interface with others.
Tony, I don’t expect the Gumshoe will be silenced while “military intelligence” operatives are able to flood the narrative with implicit “give up now because the “zio-cabal” have you “stitched up”.
I suspect the opposite is true, David. I think the rank and file of the military wil be the last to be brainwashed, and military intelligence is not happy with the current scenarion. But, otherwise, the officer class are, according, the grunts, total pricks who they plan to shoot the day they get the order to shoot civilians.
I wasn’t referring to our men in the military. I was referring to a particularly prolific commenter right here who, I dimly recall, claimed in his bio some status as an intelligence operative in a military.
Dave, the cabal can only stitch us up if we follow your Trotskyist economic prescriptions and fall for their easily unravelled psyops touting false prophets.
If we can focus our energies on the real enemy and the exposure of their most egregious crimes (9/11, JFK, Covid and Climate Change hoaxes etc), we can certainly knock them off their perch.
So Ol’ Dave, stop listening to those radical extreme left entities you rub shoulders with who are telling you to ‘give up now’.
Instead, join me abd be optimistic about the future, provided we can implement the Austrian Economic school remedies (coupled with Ron Paul’s Libertarian ‘non-aggression principle’ to be applied in matters concerning foreign policy, trade and international relations), that see to it that future revenue streams for the cabal are greatly diminished – and with it, their ability to implement their signature mischief making.
Meanwhile Dave, I believe the following article titled ‘Historical Lessons in Prosperity vs. Poverty’ will likely be the most enlightening article you’ve read in years :
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/02/simon-black/historical-lessons-in-prosperity-vs-poverty/
From the article :
“[Mongol Emperor] Kublai Khan completed his conquest of China in 1279, forging a new empire and creating the Yuan dynasty.
The Mongols were known for their expensive habits— they liked war and women especially. So when the money started to run out, administrators in the Yuan dynasty started printing paper money.
Yuan officials weren’t the first to come up with this idea; the government from the prior Song dynasty had also printed paper money. But there was a huge difference—
Paper currency from the Song dynasty, known as guanzi, was backed by copper, silver, and gold coins.
The Yuan currency, however, was backed by nothing. So whenever the government started to run out of money, they simply printed more.
By 1350, Kublai Khan had been dead for decades. But the Yuan dynasty’s economic overseers were still printing paper money like crazy. And it was causing severe hyperinflation across China.
People’s lives were turned upside down by the government’s fiscal irresponsibility, and rebellions broke out across the country.
By 1368, the Yuan dynasty had completely collapsed, and a destitute peasant farmer-turned-monk named Zhu Yuanzhang rose up to become Emperor and found the new Ming Dynasty.”
The article goes on to detail other failed societies and they all had one thing in common – their belief, like yours Ol’ Dave, that they could go without a gold / silver backed medium of exchange.
Invariably said civilisations debased the ‘currency’ they used by either printing too much paper money or incrementally reducing the amount of gold and silver in their coinage until there was next to none in it – precipitating a collapse of their empires each and every time.
The article goes on to speak of the fabulously successful nations / city states (like the Venetians, the Dutch), and the U.S in the 19th century and a good chunk of the 20th.
And they ALL had one thing in common – a GOLD and silver backed currency.
Without exception, there has not been in the last 5000 years a successful civilisation of reasonable size without a precious metal backed medium of exchange.
Yet somehow Ol’ Dave thinks ‘this time’ will be different.
Some people never learn.
Same old.
I recall that my Dad (traditional bank manager! now obsolete) had a stash of printed paper notes/currency dropped by the Japanese intended to be our Australian currency for when they arrived.
Thank God the Rothschilds ‘won’ the war and we still have their ious.
If Australia had an independent foreign policy and remained unaligned, Australia would never have been in danger from a Japanese invasion during WWII.
The ONLY reason Australia was on Japan’s radar was because we were committed to the Anglo-Zionist empire and as such Australia was always going to be a staging ground for U.S troops that were to participate in the conflict against Japan.
Make no mistake Ned, the world was FAR worse off because the Axis of Evil (U.S / U.K /Z-cabal) won the war.
The world would’ve been subjected to far less death and despair had the Axis of Virtue (Germany/Japan) won that war.
One has to understand what ‘winning’ meant for the Japanese.
The Japanese would never have been in a position to launch a land invasion of the contiguous U.S even if they sank every American naval vessel in the Pacific.
A ‘win’ for Japan would’ve been a negotiated peace where Japan was allowed to annex the Dutch East Indes (today called Indonesia) and secure its oil resources and those conquered lands on the Asian mainland.
Said truce would’ve stipulated that Australia would continue supplying Japan with iron ore and other resources – at the market rate so not as though we’d be giving it away at pence on the pound.
Of course said Aussie resources would be exchanged for quality Japanese manufactured goods – pretty much like we’ve done post war anyway.
And both societies would be better off from this engagement of voluntary trade.
Meanwhile, in Europe, Germany too would’ve allowed Britain to keep her empire (we know this for CERTAIN as these were the terms offered to Churchill after the fall of France in 1940), and a negotiated peace would’ve seen Germany annexing previous eastern and central European land masses to be incorporated into the Reich for Lebensraum.
Thereafter, a lasting peace for the bulk of humanity.
Fair go, TV! Trotsky and the rest of that band of mercenary thugs sent to make wreckage of (decadent) Russia were “employees” of the same “super capitalists” that promote the Austrian vampire school.
Since we are on ‘Judicial’ ‘hearings’ there is one coming up with the latest impeachment of Trump.
I have no idea of the procedure but it might not be without surprises referred to in the latest X22 report with some ‘door opening’.
For dumbos who know sfa about ‘space force’; they might be awakened when it is seen walking through the ‘opened door’ during the hearing.
https://x22report.com/aiovg_videos/ep-2396b-the-ds-just-opened-the-front-door-war-like-posture-activated-thank-you-for-playing/
Be interesting to see if Biden’s crew try to censor or blackout (msm) the impeachment circus evidence.
All fun, more entertaining than TV.
How clueless????
‘…………..space force, its ‘the plane of today”. How interesting?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/train-wreck-jen-psaki-issues-quasi-apology-mocking-space-force-press-briefing-video/
I scooped you !!!
How do you like this optimistic title – the-take-down-will-be-on-the-patriots-timetable – this guy should be writing copy for politicians, I want the take-down now
https://x22report.com/game-theory-the-take-down-will-be-on-the-patriots-timetable-ep-2397/
Drat – I see you scooped me on the other blogg, well I’ll have to concede, unlike General Flynn
Gentle reflections from Angie Power Disney—-it sort of links with Tony’s comment.
Her story entwined with mine–UK connection
Need to move on–or at least look at/listen to others -with relevant lived experience
https://rumble.com/vb387v-strawman-america-2020.html
https://rumble.com/vck50d-the-most-relevant-conversation-part-3.html
https://youtu.be/Kuow-34J9dM
https://rumble.com/vb387v-strawman-america-2020.html
https://rumble.com/vck50d-the-most-relevant-conversation-part-3.html
https://youtu.be/Kuow-34J9dM
apologies-intergalactic interference
The Aus elephant In the room is called Jurisdiction and like many invisible individuals I ran headlong into said beast via personal experience.
1) In 2003 I employed a law-firm to act on my behalf re a real property dispute little knowing that there was an undeclared conflict of interest
2)When the shit hit the fan the respective solicitor walked out on the job(violated the Legal Practice Act) and then tried to cover his arse by retro-activating a Supreme Court Application to Withdraw behind my back(no attempt was made to serve it)
3) He then proceeded to bill me for the respective un-taxed costs
4)When I told him, on no uncertain terms, I had no intention of paying any such thing he progressed said demand to a magistrates court claim
5) As no attempt was made at service it was determined behind my back
6) Despite the fact that it didn’t otherwise comply with the Rules of any Court in any respect a warrant of execution against the title of the family property was then issued
7) I eventually managed to get the corresponding default judgement set aside via an affidavit that disclosed all of the above and the firm was given 21 days “to file further and better particulars of claim”
8) That Order was, understandably, ignored, however, the firm refused to file a Notice of Discontinuance
9) I proceeded to file a counter-demand based on (1) &(2) accordingly
10) Due to magisterial unwillingness to fess up to the jurisdictional issue, the case wound up in the District Court, where, surprise, surprise, the Head Girl proceed to take refuge in prevarication:
BERRY MRS: Why haven’t they acted on their claim?
KENNEDY CJDC: How do you mean “acted on their claim”? What can they act on? I mean, I am not quite sure what you mean by that.
THE APPLICANT: Why haven’t they pursued their claim?
KENNEDY CJDC: Their claim against you, as I understand it, is for $10,000 and they did pursue that and it was stopped while your counterclaim was going on and what they are now doing is answering your counterclaim. They are not claiming anything extra from you. What they are saying is, “We want $10,000”. You are then saying, “I counterclaim for $100,000”. You have sought summary judgment on the $100,000. They say, “She is not entitled to summary judgment on the $100,000. We have got a case to go before the court and for the court to decide who is telling the truth.”
BERRY MRS: So, as I understand it, you’re telling me that they were unable to pursue the claim after I filed the counterclaim. Is that right?
KENNEDY CJDC: What you mean is a defence to your counterclaim. Is that what you are saying?
BERRY MRS: No, I’m asking why they did nothing to pursue their claim after 20 August 2004.
KENNEDY CJDC: Because the counterclaim is now on foot and, as I understand it, you got a stay of execution in the courts so they couldn’t pursue it. Isn’t that right, Mr Holler?
REF:ALBANY DC 5/06 TRANSCRIPT OF 8 AUG ‘06
Berry, it would be hard to beat that story. Except that if you did not act you might have lost your house. Probably that is the way some people do lose their house. Eeegads!
Come to think of it, Berry, much of the cruelty that goes on in Oz and US is of that type. Maybe a third or more are suffering right now.
The standard 21st Century governmental response to the problem has been to “privatise” land titles offices and sheriff services: when the debt gets too dirty it just gets passed on to the highest bidder
But the above saga taught me, on no uncertain terms, that anyone can total the entire game if they put their mind to it.
Evidently something that Arlyn and Oldavid have never done
Well now, berry, I guess the whole nation owes you a great debt as having put your mind to it and “totalled the entire game” there’s nothing left to bother us.
That conclusion doesn’t exactly tee up with “anyone can”.
As you are no doubt aware, God requires every soul to work out his/her own salvation with fear and trembling(Philippians 2:12)
Obviously everyone’s choices have a resounding impact, but that’s beside the point
Obviously the requirement varies from person to person, but when it’s scornfully dismissed in favour of pursuing some sort of Worldly win damned if I’m going to remain silent
I love to look at that photo of Martina Correia. She was one fantastic lady. She died 6 weeks after her dear bro was executed in 2011. Long live Martina!
The Truth About the Memo the Mainstream Media Is Refusing to Report Today
https://www.rightjournalism.com/memo-mainstream-media-refusing-report/
Military ‘Extremism’ Purge May Lead to Communism: Former Navy Lt. Commander
https://www.theepochtimes.com/military-extremism-purge-may-lead-to-communism-former-navy-lt-commander_3687319.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-02-06-2
Rogers noted that communist China has infiltrated U.S. colleges, schools, corporations, and the political system.
“Now my concern is that they are gripping … an agenda that is leading them into the ranks of our U.S. military. Now, that’s not to say that our military members are being influenced by the Chinese Communist Party, but the politicians who oversee our military are being influenced,” Rogers said.
Rogers said that the censorship on the internet and purging of people with conservative beliefs across the country is extremely disturbing.
“Now we have the Defence Secretary, which appears to be giving military members a litmus test and maybe purging those individuals who supported President Trump from the military,” he said. “It’s very dangerous. It’s going down a very, very dangerous road.”
Rogers said the upcoming “vetting” or “litmus test” in the military “is going to have a tremendous negative impact on the morale of our men and women in the military.” They will be concerned about being reported, about losing their career, or even “being prosecuted.”
Down the road, he said it would lead to the United States becoming a socialist country.
Arlyn, that ‘down the road’ prognostication is America NOW.
It already is a socialist country – precisely because it did NOT follow the template of China. ie: minimal taxation and regulatory impediments for the lower and middle class to engage in productive work. (By definition, minimal taxes means minimal funds wasted in sustaining layer upon layer of parasitic bureaucracy as in the U.S).
As Jefferson once said :
‘That government is best which governs least.’
TV
Yes I know that is why I left the US when I was 18. I have been ever vigilant since then. 🙂
Former CIA Officer Explains Whats The Joe Biden Administration Would Mean For South Asia
https://greatgameindia.com/cia-joe-biden-asia/
‘50 Things They Don’t Want You to Know About Trump’: HarperCollins Reveals Breitbart Editor Jerome Hudson’s Book Cover
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2020/07/29/50-things-they-dont-want-you-know-trump-harpercollins-reveals-breitbart-editor-jerome-hudsons-book-cover/
I not for or against any US politicians but a recorded track record is a record of accomplishments
Donald Trump is a Traitor Who Betrayed America
https://www.henrymakow.com/
Many readers on Gumshoe will be well aware that Henry Makow is a consistent truth teller.
So, when he calls out Trump as a traitor, one should not dismiss this out of hand and at least give him the courtesy of reading his justification for saying that.
If Makow’s justification coincides with real world outcomes, the necessary inferences should be drawn.
I have found him to be pretty good over a period of time. Obviously none of us are 100% accurate
Some of us are aware of the USS Liberty and 9/11 that the evil Zionist rogue terrorist state of Israel was behind both as well as behind many other criminal terrorist acts. We have Dispensationalists on Gumshoe and in Australia supporting this evil satanic entity which is treason if they are financially supporting this organisation as well as promoting this fiction of “God’s chosen people” Its an anathema to us all.
COVID 19, WAR WITH CHINA, ISRAEL, 911 & THE BOEING UN-INTERUPTABLE AUTOPILOT | RE-EDIT
https://www.brighteon.com/2728113a-c260-41d0-90d9-d15ee9040f06
https://mega.nz/file/Mr4kiCqY#5wVXFTMu3hzqieDXtQK5kUI8Jr3cmfOp06anwcaqZiQ
COVID ISRAEL BOEING UN-INTERUPTABLE AUTOPILOT & 911 – INTERVIEW FLIGHT CAPTAIN DAN HANLEY 1
https://www.brighteon.com/31bd6370-b2ef-45cf-92f2-dd033e63b95a
https://mega.nz/file/A3xWGKhY#xabctj4vBNYS5gaHu1xixgSEHbYtj2DOh8byDDzZJls
STATE OF THE NATION | BRINGING DOWN AMERICA COVID 19, ISRAEL, 911 – DAN HANLEY PART II
https://www.brighteon.com/1d5d8c8a-ef2d-4888-9c4a-4a8edb20e031
https://mega.nz/file/424iBSLA#g53Wy-gXjUJ83YL9x2xTpNjY0eqJ66l5yQ6zeyeAFfM
COVID 19 – CORONA, ISRAEL, THE BUNTING CLOVERLEAF MAP, PALESTINE & GREATER ISRAEL
https://www.brighteon.com/a84cce69-ff3f-468e-abdd-b126ad5e6b1d
https://mega.nz/file/92w0DIRC#UY2jSwPsp_pQdjJYwDDYxHka771hODxEn_p9bgCrzrM
COVID KILL SWITCH | ISRAEL & MICROSOFT, HOW THEY SUBVERT AMERICA
https://www.brighteon.com/fccf9494-3636-42ff-999a-790e8a36cff7
https://mega.nz/file/onhmwAya#Hj7t2SfvYetUO-ZMsc0x5ngy8wyyDMeLak5kbE2ApCw
COVID KILL SWITCH | ISRAEL & UNIT 8200 TAKE OVER NEW YORK & PENTAGON
https://www.brighteon.com/d7512e85-9f3d-4ab5-9f47-45ab07240872
https://mega.nz/file/dvxwmCRI#iTyW2js6CFrXlyBeA1xJRZEy3WwKu42XApHDUyq6hsM
COVID KILL SWITCH | A FEW GOOD JEWS – DEM PRESIDENTIAL HOPEFULS AMBUSHED ON THE STREETS…ISRAEL
https://www.brighteon.com/dd3228c7-a722-4f2e-b625-25301fa4e672
https://mega.nz/file/MuxwnA7L#EoGpAgKiWwFKf3W1OVl7puFTDMH2i_M5SIho0M8zfZY
COVID-19 KILL SWITCH | DID ISRAEL INVENT 5G & WHY ARE THEY SO SLOW TO BUILD 5G NETWORKS?
https://www.brighteon.com/4e38e243-39f9-41c2-9d7f-5c952e05dd58
https://mega.nz/file/NuwgQYhQ#UQKhM-0mfHdgh_FF3O8rt37KLrwDQZp7kGcTiApR6jM
“RATS IN THE RANKS” PART 1 OF 3 – ROGER STONE, SEXUAL COMPROMISE, DRUG TRAFFICKING, GAY FOR PAY, SHADOW GATE
https://www.brighteon.com/bfa44aa5-47a5-4088-a059-98f82dcbe63d
https://mega.nz/file/0vgwlSiZ#IETvp_zhUi1b1iUXKrst1wigFhbF4S1LtBfi6xmBxBY