Home False Flags CPS Let’s Roll, Part 4: New Legislation and Fiona Barnett’s Revelations

CPS Let’s Roll, Part 4: New Legislation and Fiona Barnett’s Revelations

16
Holsworthy1-1024x576
Part of the Holsworthy Base

By Mary W Maxwell, LLB

Editor’s Note: Gumshoe already presented the law to investigate Holsworthy Army Base, but that will be repeated here in the context of “new legislation”:

I am inventorying any proper means that people can use to achieve the goal of Reunion of a child with its Protective parent. One such means is new legislation. Let us think for a moment of laws that could be enacted to counteract the scandalous state of affairs in the Family Court, the Childrens Courts, and child protection agencies.

Amend Bad Laws — Federal

Federal Parliament right now, without further ado, could repeal or amend any part of the Family Law Act that is bad.

One possible bad part is: the Family Law Act’s dismissing the Evidence Act. Parliament could re-impose many of the standards of evidence developed over centuries in common law and statutory law.

While it can be a good thing for Family Court judges to have more flexibility than in criminal court, it is crazy to give them absolute discretion to dispense with due process. Really it offends the sacredness of law.

The infamous section 60CC could also be changed. It quite ridiculously tells the judge to do two things that are outside his ability to do:

Subsection (a) tells him to assure a meaningful relationship of the child with both parents – this is not a job for government or law; it is nature. Subsection (b) tells the judge to watch out for the child’s safety, yet there is no mechanism for him to investigate the situation.

Also, Sec 112AP of the Family Law Act could be amended to clarify the particular contraventions of orders that constitute contempt

Parents are confused and scared about this.

Legislate for Child Protection Agencies and Guardians

The word appalling does not do justice, as we have seen, in describing the capriciousness of the CPS in determining that a mum has coached, that she has thereby emotionally harmed the child, or that she is lying about the sexual abuse.

It is as though there are no standards. Even items in file that utterly contradict each other are not considered to be a problem to solve!

There should be action on this by Parliament, not by the courts. The basic relationship of legislature to judiciary is: parliament makes the laws and courts apply those laws.

If I understand it correctly today (and believe me it is obtuse), the typical mum confronted with false accusations by CPS and destruction of records, thinks it’s for the judge to sort.

A judge is a manager of any case before him. Thus it is possible for him to question the fairness of any procedure or the competence of evidence collection. But the CPS should not have done a bad job in the first place.

Let me name a few legislative ideas that could relieve some mums:

  1. Get rid of the deceptive wording in Parent Responsibility Contracts. Why should a mum not be told that keeping her kid out of school for a family trip will lead to guardianship?
  1. Criminalize any extortion-type threats by CPS workers – and also by judges – such as “If you don’t sign this agreement to share custody, you won’t see your child again.”
  1. Remove all aspects of financial incentives involved in the removal of a kid from home into state care or adoption. We know that in any area of life a financial incentive can pervert the values that are supposedly at hand (e.g., he “needs a stable home.”)
  1. Simply do not allow forced adoptions. (There is a helpful UK website forced-adoption.com). A mother has the right to her child. So does a father. Recall the Johnasen v Norway case at the European Court of Human Rights.
  1. It may be wise to legislate CPS out of existence. We can see that any agency with a license to grab children is very likely to become part of the illicit trafficking network.

This sort of temptation is known in the insurance industry as “moral hazard.” Legislation often seeks to counter moral hazard.

Legislate for the Childrens Court (a.k.a. Youth Court)

Someone in each state parliament decided that the normal courts weren’t suitable for family matters. So a special court was set up to try juveniles for crimes — and to be the handmaiden of the CPS, which is the handmaiden of police.

As George Potkonyak pointed out, the Childrens Court has “dispositional proceedings” and “establishment proceedings.” That looks like obfuscation to me, and it’s worse in the US which has adversary hearing, status hearing, initial permanency planning, and other, pardon my French, garbage.

The result is that families spend all their time, money, and nerves on it. To repeat, it is for parliamentarians to control this; it’s their baby.

Can Parliament Control Police?

I have the impression that police do not answer to politics. The Police Act 1998 SA legislates such things as how police should take a urine sample. But can it get police to stop kowtowing to pedo-rings? That is the job of the DPP. And thereby hangs another tale; see below.

Fiona Barnett Wants You

On July 18, 2018, Fiona Barnett, a survivor of MK-Ultra, read an hour’s worth of stunning testimony to the International Tribunal for Natural Justice.  In my opinion, human history changed the minute she spoke. Fiona has more than just allegations; she has insider knowledge.

NEEDLE TORTURE
Drawing by Fiona Barnett   from pedophilesdownunder.com

By luck one parliamentarian helped her: Senator Bill Heffernan. For fun, I have drafted a piece of (amateurish) legislation to show how easy it is to do. Many laws are written by corporations or other interested parties, and handed in to the legislature to be enacted. You can do this, too.

I’ll call mine the Heffernan bill, and it will seek to investigate what Fiona says goes on in Holsworthy Army Base basement.

Fiona says child protective services are riddled with child-traffickers. And she came down hard on universities, identifying many scholars who she thinks are members of a Luciferian cult. At Holsworthy, she says, you may find children who were “bred” for various uses (organ sale? prostitution? snuff films?).

A typical draft law looks something like this:

An Act for the  Investigation of Holsworthy Army Base

— Recognizing that there is a powerful criminal contingent in Australia today,

— Acknowledging that bringing suspects to justice has been hampered by secrecy and fear,

— Realizing that the citizenry was shocked by the findings of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse, we enact this statute to investigate Holsworthy Army Base in regard to crimes against children and to facilitate the indictment of powerful persons.

A questionnaire will be sent out to members of certain professions.

Within 30 days of receiving The Questionnaire, each person must answer it under oath, divulging the extent to which they were aware of sexual abuse of children or any unauthorized experimentation on children at any time.

Children here means: persons under the age of 18.

[other definitions. Etc]

Refusal to register or to answer the questionnaire is an offense. The penalty is a fine of $500,000 and 2 years prison. No one who admits that they failed to report crime will be charged with having failed to report crime.

Parliament will establish a panel (hereinafter “The Panel”) that will be accountable to the Attorney General. Panel members will be vetted to eliminate conflicts of interest.

Attorneys-General will liaise with Commonwealth Minister of Defence concerning the military.  The state Attorneys-General will liaise with the Commonwealth Minister of Home Affairs about any involvement of ASIO. The Prime Minister will brief any foreign government if needed.

This law comes into effect 14 days after it receives the royal assent.

[That’s the end of my draft of “the Heffernan bill.”]

See how easy it is to legislate? But under present state law, indictments are the prerogative of a “Director of Public Prosecutions,” a DPP. Someone in each state Parliament and in Canberra could draft a simple bill called “The Abolition of the Office of Public Prosecutions Act.” Easy.

Politicians, paralyzed for a long time, may seem reluctant to act. But maybe they’d gladly jump on the bandwagon if you start it going. Try giving “the Heffernan bill” to your MP.

Once there is a bill in parliament, interested members can call for a division – thus the ayes and the nays get identified. (They stand on opposite sides of the room – it’s rarely done, but it’s legally provided for.) Every MP would find himself asking  “Am I for or against child-stealing?” Or “Am I for or against the torturing of parents in the Childrens Courts?”

Citizens today need to have it drummed into them that society is in charge of society.  Citizens need to hear specifically that all persons are accountable. Were you shocked when I said Holsworthy will be investigated?  I was shocked myself!

Let’s go around shocking everybody with the news that top brass in the armed forces (and police forces, and ASIO) are not above the law. And remind everyone that cover-up of crime is a felony.

What else would you like to make legislation for? Until 1991 there were laws in Australia to prevent anyone owning too many news outlets. Then the big owners got Parliament to repeal that law. Just get Parliament to repeal the repeal.

You could make laws to do anything that does not violate the Constitution. (Note: you can’t criminalize a deed retroactively.)

How about court fees that make a mockery of Magna Charta’s promise that law will not be bought or sold? You can repeal the Childrens Court’s $4.95-per-page photocopy fee!

Stand for Parliament

Why not just become a legislator? Start your campaign by getting your name around, in connection with any beneficial activity. Or start by running for a small office that nobody wants, to get a foot in the door!

Perhaps you should join one of the small parties; they need candidates to put forward. To run as an Independent you need to collect signatures well in advance. Definitely it’s doable.

Even if there is little chance of winning a seat in Parliament your candidacy can educate people about the issues. I have tried it myself twice (in the US). The public was very welcoming. They want new ideas.

They want you.

 

SHARE

16 COMMENTS

  1. Again, the reason I love Gumshoe news is the simple fact they don’t just publish the truth (unlike mainstream media) they also offer WORKABLE solutions. Mary, your article, like the upcoming version of your book ‘Reunion’, is essential reading for every Australian citizen. Thank you for being such an intelligent champion for the voiceless.

    • Rachel, how can it be that Gumshoe is so lacking in competitors?

      Today I went to “Google scholar” to check on a case that I wrote about, maybe 10 years ago. It is an extremely important case. I was settling down for an afernoon’s read of dozens of articles on that case, but there was only one there. — and it was the one by me.

      And it wasn’t even good. How can this beeeee? Has everybody gone to the beach or something?

  2. You were credible in your writings until you got to Fiona.
    When will people realise that Fiona needs professional mental health help.
    She has taken other survivors stories and made them her own.
    I ask a couple of questions a lot, but no one answers me.
    For example:

    Where did the monies go that were raised on Go Fund Me, or some other fund raising site, for the truck driver, If I remember correctly his name was Gordon, I could be wrong in that though.
    But thousands were raised and he didn’t see a single cent?

    How does she belong to some military force, learning all about killings then gets sent out to South America, from the ages of 6 until 14 when she was here in Australia at school!!
    In her own words!!

    “I was put through full military training at age 6 years and assigned to a small unit of all male soldiers. My basic soldier training was supervised by Colonel Victor Change at Holsworthy Army Base. ”

    “My training was completed in the USA at age 14 years by Lieutenant Colonel Michael Aquino in a special laboratory established at Dulce underground base. Delta training included the weaponization of psychic ability, or psychic warfare training”

    “Following training, my unit and I were deployed to South America where the CIA were conducting operations against so-called communist governments”

    Explain those things to me please!

    I guess this comment won’t see the light of day on your page Gumshoe, like most of my other replies!!

  3. I always have a little laugh when I see “no one is above the law” as it only applies to ordinary honest people and not the elite that belong to various clubs unless of course they become a liability then thrown “under the bus” ie: pell harris cosby ect

    • I think Harris and Cosby were thrown under the bus but not Pell.
      Wayne, I just went to look up Cosby and found a case in the Southern District of NY (totally corrupt) which said

      “The alleged details of Avenatti’s profanity-laced demands (caught on tape by the FBI) grabbed headlines.” What? Since when does the FBI tape anything!

  4. I so wish that the crimes of these satanic sadistic cults would be investigated, but take a look at David Bottrill making money for the OTO or himself, by suing people who dare to mention how Dr Reina Michaelson was brought undone. I got ordered by the equal opportunity board to write an apology on my fb page, he wanted me to say there was no truth to the allegations, I compromised and agreed to say there was no proof, and clarified that there was no proof because of serous cover ups, and how Dr Reina tried for years to bring it to some higher authority for investigation. It was real strange to hear the voice of this David on the phone, traumatic in a way to try and reason with someone that evil. Religious vilification laws now prevents anyone connecting the OTO with satanic ritual abuse, since that horrible book of the law written by Alister crowely was written a long time ago!!!!! HHHHmmmmm Where do the children who are trafficked end up?
    With Scott Morrison now being Pm, with his Hillsong connections I have serious doubt that anything good is going to happen legislation wise for survivors or child victims. However I also think Mary that doing what you suggest above is a good idea, as it would make all the people receiving it more aware of the real issues which prevents abuse of children being stopped.
    To Deni with the above comment on Fiona.
    Are you aware that professional mental help in Australia also can bring you to the attention of the Mkultra/childtrafficking global network. Not many regain their memories or have the ability to expose them, yet youtube has many testimonies by just such survivors. It is the people who are running our militarize, and the elites who give the orders for the exploitation and murders of millions who need so called professional help in the form of a bullet perhaps. This earth is run by evil.
    I would also like to know what happened to the money raised for Henry. I have no real idea of the circumstances involved, so won’t make any comment on that, thou where there is abuse and suffering there is often some selfish fucker who sees an opportunity to deceive people and make some cash, however what Fiona have done by coming out and exposing all this has nothing to do with making money. Who would expose them selves to so much public ridicule and danger to make money? What can be done to stop the satanic abuse of children? She is doing that and has also been a voice for other victims She is lucky to still be alive

    • “Religious vilification laws now prevents anyone connecting the OTO with satanic ritual abuse.
      Ms Madsen, what laws?

      “money raised for Henry.” Henry who?

      “How Dr Reina Michaelson was brought undone.” Please say more. I am ignorant of it.

    • Miaaimmia, everyone keeps saying Fiona has put herself in personal danger by “coming out”. Nothing could be further from the truth, if it was true she would have been knocked off years ago, she’s in no more danger than I am when I cross the street.
      All we have is her say in all of this, no body else has come forward to say they saw this and that happening to her.

      As for her being the voice of other victims, does stealing their stories and using them as your own count?
      More proof of her lies is this:
      She made a video of her standing on the property pointing out where abuses took place at 14 McAlister Ave, the house where her alleged grandparents lived. But they never lived there, they lived at 30 McAlister Ave, how could she get that so wrong?
      You can read that piece of information at the link below, plus many many more interesting facts!
      https://mega.nz/?#!Tn4ilCKR!1dTZo94QW2EdQmxuKwFSpaaO8zLGH39MdRTTFK2Mn5g

      The truck driver she raised money for was Gordon, not Henry.
      Mary, she raised money for him to get his truck back, google it!!

      Simon, Fiona is only a danger to her own mental health, and those of her children that have to suffer through this!

  5. Its a good a response as any “The Questionnaire”, but to garner facts from that tactic requires “extreme logic” which risks mudding the already very muddy waters. ie- asking the best liars to lie.
    I saw WA may introduce law to compel(not ComPell), chosen men to disclose discussions of child abuse.
    Legislation that compels whistleblower reporting instead of alleged protection and the tabling of these reports over time should rout some of these systemic issues that seem almost foundational in our highest protection services.

    Aside: Deni do you think Fiona is so far gone and dangerous that we need legislation to nullify even the concept of informed medical treatment. If we sliced that ledgeo into to the Section D, none the wiser eh?

  6. Oz is a prison island . The sad reality , is that the middle (majority) class has been decimated
    by the central banksters cartel , since the turn of the century . Repeating the 1% and 9% enforcers
    rule here with the iron fist of plutocratic techno dictatorship . Everything’s all good but the truth ,
    behind the curtains , is really really bad . The global elite have come here to be with their brothers
    and sisters . They live in their protected towers , while the majority of us are slaves in the debt
    usury scam . It is because of their immense
    vampire like wealth that depraved
    evil has become entrenched in our society . They protect each other because they are the terrorists
    .
    “The strong doing what they can and the weak suffering what they must … and the gas leaks ,
    the oil spills , sex sells everything , sex kills .”
    – Joni

  7. Deni Tomkinson, you denigrate Fiona based on what appears to be a rumour you heard: “Where did the monies go that were raised on Go Fund Me, or some other fund raising site, for the truck driver, If I remember correctly his name was Gordon, I could be wrong in that though. But thousands were raised and he didn’t see a single cent?” Why would you make a comment based on a flimsy memory of a rumour which you yourself seem unsure of? Is it possible that you just don’t want to believe what Fiona is saying, based on the opinion others (whom I won’t mention) have expressed to you? Also, aeroplanes fly people from one country to another on a regular basis, and have done so for many decades. It is possible for someone to be in two countries on the very same day.

  8. I keep trying to post this but obviously free speech isn’t allowed in here, but i’ll keep trying:

    I’m not unsure of anything Rachel, it’s fact that Gordon never got a cent of the money she raised for him.
    He’s even written about it himself!

    I don’t believe what Fiona is saying because of the decent research I have done on her for a couple of years now. For a start, her timelines are all wrong, she mixes things up, and don’t say that people can get things wrong now and then, by all accounts she keeps meticulous records of everything that comes out of her mouth or fingers, if she’s typing something.
    For the record, I don’t believe your stories either, but that is a whole other subject!

  9. Why not get Fiona Barnett involved in writing and or reviewing the laws, procedures and processes in child abuse cases? Its not like she does not have any relevant experience is it? Why is she not invited to comment on proposed legislation? Is there any law that says only the perps are allowed to do this kind of thing??

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.