by Mary W Maxwell, LLB (Adel)
This is my message to the top brass, and the bottom gold, of the Law Society of South Australia and the Police Force of that state.
Perhaps you have heard, or maybe you haven’t heard, that some completely unexpected developments are occurring at a humble online daily news outlet called Gumshoenews.com. Gumshoe is mainly written by the editor, Dee McLachlan, and by myself, so when I say “we” here I mean Dee and me.
We were going along minding our own business when certain things came to our attention about the Child Protection Service and the Family Court.
So now we are in the thick of that, and now have received cries for help from some very hard-done-by Mums of Adelaide. (Mums — and Dads — from other states are in similar circumstances, but since I’m addressing you in South Australia, let’s customize it to our dear state.)
We are told of children who are at this very moment in grave danger in South Australia, and any caring person who tries to rescue or shield them gets stonewalled – or worse – by government. What? You are surprised? You don’t believe me? Well, that’s a very good sign. That means you are not in on it.
But many are in on it. “Law enforcement” “the judiciary” and “the media” are in on it, for sure. I know this because it has been my work for the last 30 years or so (since I was a Politics postgrad student right there in the Napier Building) to figure out what power is all about.
Also, I’m American-born, with one eye always on developments in the US. Thus I really did get the jump on this by studying , since 2005, the CIA’s program of mind-control. Stupid me failed to notice that MK-Ultra also came to Oz, around the 1940s. But luckily, three Aussies –Diane Devere, Fiona Barnett, and Steve McMurray – have got me up to speed on that.
Did you attend my Fringe play last year? Or have you sampled my free-download book entitled “Deliverance! – A Royal Commission and Pizzagate Reveal Society’s Hidden Rulers”? The fact is that the pedo-games that go on are only a small aspect of what the Big Boys get up to. In a moment I will offer you an amazing crash course right now as to the rulership of Planet Earth.
Only 750 words for you to read and you will never be the same again. These words are from a 1905 publication in a Russian newspaper, popularly referred to as “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” It’s not at all clear that the persons known as Zionists cooked this up; it may have been planted on them. (I’m putting ten dollars on the latter.)
Even for the Brass among you, this stuff will be a revelation. I dearly hope that if you are one of the many accomplices in Adelaide’s pedo-rings, you will quickly see how YOU are being taken advantage of by a group of arrogant bastards who would NEVER be inclined to support you if you get into strife. Believe me, you are on your own.
Please read the 750 words now:
“Protocols of Elders of Zion”
1 – In these [Masonic] lodges we shall find our principal intelligence office and means of influence…. Among the members of these lodges will be almost all the agents of international and national police since their service to us is irreplaceable. [They keep from view] our activities and provide pretexts for discontents. We execute Masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can ever have a suspicion of it. They all die as from a normal kind of illness.
2 – The people, under our guidance, have eliminated the aristocracy, who were their one and only defense and foster mother…. Masonry blindly serves as a screen for us. We appear on the scene as alleged saviors – Socialists, Anarchists, Communists, to whom we always give support in accordance with alleged brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our social masonry. De facto we have already wiped out every kind of rule except for our own…. Nowadays, if any States raise a protest against us it is only proforma, and by our direction.
3 –Capital must be free to establish a monopoly of industry and trade …. This will give political force to those engaged in industry, and that will help to oppress the people…. The intensification of armaments, the increase of police forces – are all essential for the completion of the aforementioned plans.
4 – All organs of the press are bound together by professional secrecy ….We shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries…. Through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade…. And if there should be any found who are desirous of writing against us, they will not find any person eager to print their productions…. Trial shots… fired by us in the third rank of our press, will be energetically refuted by us in our semi-official organs.
5 – [We try] to multiply to such an extent national failings, habits, passions, conditions of civil life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is in the resulting chaos… There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative if it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord.
6 – In all ages [people] have accepted words for deeds. They rarely pause to note, in the public arena, whether promises are followed by performance. Therefore we shall establish show institutions.
7 – Our directorate will have knowledge of all the secrets of the social structure…with the whole underside of human nature, with all its sensitive chords on which they will have to play. Persons [who disobey] our instructions, must face criminal charges or disappear.
8 – We shall arrange elections in favor of such presidents as have in their past some dark, undiscovered stain. We shall invest the president with the right of declaring a state of war. No one outside ourselves will any longer direct the force of legislation. We shall instigate officials near the president to evade his dispositions by taking measures of their own. He will further annul [laws] when we indicate to him to do so.
9 – It is indispensable to trouble people’s relations with their governments so as to utterly exhaust humanity with dissension … even by the use of torture, starvation, inoculation of diseases, so that [they have no option but] to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else. How clear is the undeveloped power of thought of the purely brute brains of the [masses] as expressed in the fact that they have been borrowing from us with payment of interest.
10 – Thanks to the Press we have got the gold in our hands. We have had to gather it out of the oceans of blood and tears…. To sum up our system of keeping the governments in Europe in check . . . we shall respond with the guns of America or China or Japan.
11 – Who will ever suspect then that all these peoples were stage-managed by us according to a political plan which no one has so much as guessed at in the course of many centuries?
12 – When we at last definitely come into our kingdom [it will be] by the aid of coups d’état prepared everywhere for one and the same day…. With this purpose we shall slay without mercy all who take up arms to oppose our coming into our kingdom.
— end of excerpt. That was my abbreviation of a long text; the numbering is arbitrary. – MM
Pretty Amazing, Huh?
These guys have gone about their program slowly, methodically, ruthlessly. They have taken over the world while we sat around for a century, innocently letting them flourish in their strange, strange trade.
Meanwhile back at Gumshoe, there are parents pleading with me to get them some “legal assistance.” I am not even going to try. All others have failed, as the Big Boys have placed some nifty roadblocks in their path.
Even if I could find a solicitor in Adelaide to take the case of a particular Mum (we can call her “Gemma”) – that solicitor will be prevented from using the law in her favour. Never mind that her ex-husband has told the kids that he is going to kill them. Never mind that he makes them perform fellatio. Never mind anything, the roadblocks are in place.
So I’m writing to you to tell you, SAPOL and Law Society, to dismantle the roadblocks, pronto. As my boss Dee has discovered, one block is that the police turn away any person whose case is before the Family Court. Gemma can get no help there, even in the face of a death threat to her offspring. See?
The other block is – wow it’s so clever it’s staggering – the Family Court penalizes any parent who reports that his or her spouse is engaging in sexual abuse of the child. Whoops, didn’t Australia just run a kazillion dollar Royal Commission to ferret out the problem of “child sexual abuse”?
Apparently not. Please start – always – from the premise that the Big Boys know exactly what to do for the sake of their own arses (and their own pathetic “mission” as defined in the Protocols above) and so they’ve got everybody locked down into obedience.
Hence, Gemma 1 and Gemma 5, and maybe Gemma 500, have been veritable stunned mullets. They can’t take any steps to help their own children. Their solicitor tells them that the judge can hold them in contempt if they bring forth their true story.
(Don’t you love it?)
Their solicitor also breaks the news to them that he himself will lose his “admission to Family Court” if he speaks freely. Yep, and he ain’t lying about that.
Which brings us to the media. If Gemma’s solicitor got forcibly carried out of Family Courthouse, the Adelaide Advertiser would be there to snap the scandalous picture and spread it around so as to rouse the public’s righteous indignation, right?
Um, I guess it’s time to re-read Item 4:
“All organs of the press are bound together by professional secrecy …. Through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade….”
I say: bring them out of the shade now. Their time has come. They asked for it. What idiots.
Dear Law Society and SAPOL,
This is why I am writing directly to you. I do not seek your social-conscience flutterings. I do not ask you to be brave, noble, or any of that stuff. I urge you only to consider your personal interest. The Gemma’s 1 through 500 suddenly woke up to all this and they are extremely unlikely to go back into retreat. There is action in the works! You will not be able to continue in the usual way.
The Mums have tossed aside their (hugely illegal) “gag orders.” A mother’s instinct, you know, is always for the life of her child, including at the cost of her own life. As for me, I’m old, one foot in the grave type thing, and I don’t care what the Big Boys do to me. They will do the same to you. And if you are a Mason or a Shriner, please re-read Item 1:
“We execute Masons in such wise that none save the brotherhood can ever have a suspicion of it. They all die as from a normal kind of illness.”
Frankly you could go anytime. I’d like to say “We’ve got your back,” but I myself would not be interested in helping someone who is holding Gemma at bay.
That includes the officers of the SA Law Society who get paid to do precisely what Gemma needs – to weed out unethical solicitors and barristers. Judges are, of course, barristers. Note: they are clearly acting ultra vires, not to mention criminally, in advising the Mums that if they mention sexual abuse the kid will be allocated to the abuser!!!
I’ve heard that The Law Society in another state of Oz is a den of iniquity, yet its mission statement is justice. In my Law School, a sign in the lobby says Fiat justicia ruat coelum. Fairly assertive – “Let there be justice though the heavens fall.”
Bottom line: what can we do? What is the scope here for negotiation? I have asked a couple of Adelaide friends to show up on the steps of Parliament House on Sunday September 30 at 2:00pm as a way of taking your thoughts on board – if anyone wishes to do that.
It’s not going to be a sign-waving rally. Just a talk shop.
The time has come to face the Bozos whose ancestors had the nerve to say: “We have had to gather [our gold] out of the oceans of blood and tears….”
Think about this: the rest of the world will be sooo pleased to hear that South Australia is saying Enough is enough; this must stop.
Argue back at me, please, if you can. And in any case go take Gemma out of her immediate danger.
A commenter on yesterday’s post (”Letter to AGs about Family Court and Parent Alienation”) stated that hundreds of mothers have falsified affidavits to keep kids away from their Dads.
I don’t doubt it for a minute. I don’t doubt that divorcing spouses go bananas punishing each other in every way. I also don’t doubt that parent alienation (and sibling alienation and grandparent alienation) occurs “in Nature” so to speak. I mean no court context is eve needed; people do mistreat one another. It’s as old as the Bible.
But that is not what this series of articles is dealing with. We are dealing with a culture of control of SA government by a pedophile ring. It would be a miracle if SA had escaped this control as it is world wide.
Bill Windsor, in his series “Lawless America” on Youtube, interviewed a thousand Americans as to very weird and cruel treatment they have received from the court. Now that is new. US courts did not, in past centuries, act like sadists.
Now they take kids in cases where there is no dispute between Mom and Dad, and no pedophilia, but just because the parents don’t earn enough money to support the kids. If this were known to the general public there would be a reaction. It is legally and constitutionally unsupportable. But it gets hidden – nice folks assume that if kids have been taken away the parents must have been very naughty, very dangerous.
But it’s the System that is naughty and dangerous and it is up to us all to stop this. Granted, that won’t be easy. The “Controllers” are the same controllers who make all decisions, re war, re finance, re culture, re health. Did you see the above mention of “inoculations”?
I feel I am probably being unfair to coppers and maybe too fair to the law society. How many cops know what goes on in the inner chamber?
Actually, gumshoeing, in the original sense of the word, is fun, and cops should be enjoying that fun.
Maybe soon enough when we get the Beaumont situation as clear as a bell, the cops will take a new attitude to their work. For now, it’s “Ya but you don’t go”:
It is NOT true that the RC’s terms of reference were too narrow. I quote:
ELIZABETH THE SECOND, by the Grace of God Queen of Australia …
WHEREAS all children deserve a safe and happy childhood. AND Australia has undertaken international obligations ….[regarding] reporting, referral, investigation, treatment and follow up of incidents of child abuse.
AND all forms of child sexual abuse are a gross violation of a child’s right to this protection and a crime under Australian law AND it is important that claims of systemic failures … be fully explored….
NOW THEREFORE We do, by these Our Letters Patent… appoint you to be a Commission of inquiry, and require and authorise you, to inquire into institutional responses to allegations and incidents of child sexual abuse and related matters, and in particular….
c. what should be done to eliminate or reduce impediments that currently exist for responding to child sexual abuse
AND, We direct you …to have regard to the following matters:
e. the experience of people directly or indirectly affected by child sexual abuse ….
f. the need to focus your inquiry and recommendations on systemic issues….
AND, We authorise you to take action… i.e, the need to establish mechanisms … for the purpose of enabling the timely investigation and prosecution of offences;…[!!!]
AND We declare that in these Our Letters Patent: institution means any public or private body, agency, association, club, institution, organisation or other entity or group of entities of any kind and however described…. [SEE ? The legal profession is not excluded, nor is the police organization.]
WITNESS Quentin Bryce, Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia. Dated 11th January 2013 Julia Gillard, Prime Minister
Norwegian.
Kudos to you Mary, well written as always. You have helped those that have asked of you.
Thanks, Simon, late of Norway, but I have not really helped them. They need everybody’s help. They need as many peeps as possible to notice who is really running the show.
What could an individual cop do? I don’t know. Do you recall the video we showed recently in which a burly-built man in uniform came to the home to take the baby away. The Dad handed the baby over, but what if he had refused? i suppose the cop is instructed to use force.
“Darlene” said two SA cops used force to grab her child “Ellen” who tried to run from them on Angas Street. If those cops are Dads they would not have enjoyed the task.
I repeat: They need as many peeps as possible to notice who is really running the show. Our amazing ability to make-beleive it’s someone other than the real ruler is an unfortunate talent of ours.
Concentrate on that photo of Jimmy Savile embracing Margaret Thatcher. Eureka! Got it!
Thought, lets see if apn outdoor media is controlled by these sick f**kS, can you guys start a go fund me page perhaps and people can donate to get billboards placed around the city and suburbs. If people can donate and get some design done , with the right calling out of the abuse , even one saying , sapol know where the beumonts kids are and now so do you and post the address.
Lets get full on, you guys have a great media outlet here , lets share it
Bill boards — that’s a good idea.
I am deeply disturbed by what you wrote and I know that you wrote the truth. I am disturbed by the realisation that there really is no help for parents with children. It is such a disgrace that this is happening. I know about the press and their fake news and influence over people. It is deeply shameful that all the institution that are supposed to help people do not help at all. Thank you for enlightening me further into the corruption that pervades the world.
“disturbed by the realisation that there really is no help for parents with children”.
Hell, I didn’t say that.
Truth will out. Murder will out. That’s in the nature of things. You will see.
The title of this article is a dead give-away
I mean, if you see a semi-trailer hurtling down the road with the driver asleep at the wheel are you really going to wave your finger at him and cry “enough is enough, this must stop” ?
Perhaps warning others to get out of the way would be a better idea.
Berry, not all the drivers are asleep.
So?
if your next of kin gets run over by a truck manslaughter/murder arguments aren’t going to make any significant difference.
Prevention is always better than cure: There’s no remedy for the fact that most lawyers don’t care about anything more than the easiest rout to profit and the travesty called “family law” takes the cake.
What every parent needs to understand is that the current governmental system is wholly dependent on the enslavement of the population and that the so-called “Family Court” wasn’t founded for any other purpose.
What Gumshoe needs to understand is that there’s nothing more counter-productive than 60 minute-style outrage
Berry, I agree that the Family Court and the Child Protective Service fit beautifully into Item # 6 from the above Protocols of the Elders of Zion, viz.:
“In all ages [people] have accepted words for deeds. They rarely pause to note, in the public arena, whether promises are followed by performance. Therefore we shall establish show institutions.”
The prize for Show Institutions should probably go to the Office of Inspector General — whether of Centrelink or of the FBI.
And to think that the IG’s actually draw a salary.
Hi Mary
Although this is peripheral to your primary focus, I now know of several hundred researchers, journalists, and authors who, over the past twenty years, have been researching the genesis of the power elite who call the shots, world-wide. They include names like Robert Fisk, James Petras, PC Roberts, Seymour Hersh, John Pilger, Israel Shamir, Michel Chossudovsky, and Andrew Marshall. Chomsky was the stand-out exception, which resulted in his spectacular fall from grace.
On that journey, they analysed the behaviour of dozens of organisations, including Masonic lodges, Bilderbergers, Illuminati, CIA, Club of Rome, Sierra Club, and so on. All analysts eventually eliminated these suspects.
For some reason, Christians going down this road settle on either the Jesuits or Masonics and look no further. No independent analysts (above) concur. In fact, every one of the above (and this now runs to millions world-wide from a mere handful two decades ago), have traced this genesis to the Rothschilds and their roles in creating Israel, the US Federal Reserve, and the Bolshevik Revolution, and then backtracked to the investment banker/corporate elite who own all the main oil companies, chemical and pharmaceutical industries, food storage and agribusiness, bio-industries, and war manufacturers.
It is pure unadulterated fact that most of the White House and Administration staff are Zionists, as are the most influential lobbies (ie AIPAC), and that Israel’s economy relies on US finance and capital to survive. In fact, Israel would now be occupied by the UN over war crimes and its murderous apartheid policies if it were not for the US Security Council barrier.
The conversation world-wide, by almost non-NATO nations, is that the UN must be replaced with a universally accountable organisation in which all nations have equal power. When this happens, the US and Israel, conjoined with Germany and France, and possibly the UK, will be required to conform to democratic processes or be excluded. This will have mammoth trade implications.
Whether this happens or not, the dialogue always centres on the role of Israel/US in Syria, Israel/US/Saudi Arabia in Yemen, Israel/France/UK/US in Libya, and so on. Israel/Zionism is the common link.
Because the evidence is so painfully extant, I can only conclude that Christians will always chose Belief over Evidence whenever the two come into conflict. I suspect this applies to all religions, although some Hindus are powerfully suggesting otherwise to me.
Tony, of the 8 independent researchers you name, I think 6 are controlled opposition.
As for the “power of Israel” today I think it is next to nil, just as I think the power of the United States is next to nil if what we are talking about is the US as a nation, a people, a culture. The culture is entirely designed by designers. It should pop up spontaneously, but oh no, we have to have Facebook, Kentucky Fried, student loans, everything is an assembly line.
I know my view is not shared by many (or any?) but I see the whole fiasco as one that was predictable by our species characteristics. I think the guys at the top — generations ago — worked themselves into a corner, and their descendants have to do a lot of hard work just to keep disaster at bay.
I hereby invite all the Bozo’s to come out of hiding and have a nice relaxed vacation in a group that does not include other Bozo’s. Ask for love. Ask for forgiveness. Find out about some emotions you have never experienced that are absolutely delicious.
Hey, Bozo’s, join a choir. Stop torturing children, it is really not a pursuit you should put any more time into. The main reason you do it is like I said about the ancestors leaving you in a pickle.
Fie on the friggin’ ancestors.
And the first one of the audience members who was in Bathurst Town Hall that day and who will sit for an interview is eligible for a special cupcake. This nonsense has really got to stop.
True (para 3). Its one thing to win it, but quite a different problem to keep it. Especially across generations.
Just sharing re Mary’s repsonse
From around 8:00 Engdahl talks about Syria and how Israel and the US don’t want a shooting war in Syria. At 9:30 he talks about the Bildeberg group… mmm !!!???
• Interview with author F. William Engdahl by Patrick Henningsen
https://youtu.be/dLd_folvlm4?t=480
Tony, the information was available a lot earlier than just 20 years ago. Douglas Reed’s book ‘The Controversy of Zion’ has been available for a long time.
http://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/index.htm
It is a very long read, but worth it for those who really want to understand history.
My comment was erased while I was typing it. Please read the book review on my FaceBook Timeline for 7 March 2018.
Dear Helen, I did not find the book review at your FB but I found this statement by you, which seems to relate to a change.org petition for a new RC into the Family Court System. I personally have zero enthusiasm for any more RC’s, but I like what you said, as follows:
“…the Australian Family Court is major enabler and promoter of child abuse within families. Because of legal immunity and the restrictions on publication of details of Family Court cases, only those involved with the Family Court are able to know what goes on.
“Perverse and intentional Family Court decisions are the cause of many of today’s social problems including youth mental illness, suicide, criminal activity and failure at school and in life. No one seems to care that the draining of family funds through high legal costs has greatly increased the need for government welfare assistance.”
Glad you brought up the ol’ protocols Mary. For a supposed fraud and libel against the Chosen Ones they seem incredibly predictive. Must be another Cohencidence.
They are fabulously predictive. Like Orwell only deeper. Everything they said in 1905 has come true.
My ten dollar bet is about the authorship. The general thrust is pretty straight Machiavellianism. I also have a theory that Theodore Herzl got the bounce at age 44 a he was not pulling the new philosophy of Zionism into he right trajectory.
Anyway, Paul, does it matter? If you could prove to me today (and maybe you could) that the whole operation is based in Tel Aviv, rather then London or Washington DC, would we be any closer to getting the yoke off our neck?
Say we identified Israel as the baddy and then blew it up with some new weapon. Next morning, no Israel. Would Australia’s Family Court start to work honestly for children?
Maybe they would, maybe they would.
They could have a dry run of it right now. The Law Society could make it happen. Hey, let’s do it. PRETEND the baddies have all drunk the — I can’t remember the stuff Socrates drank — and nobody has to fake the fake anymore.
We could try blowing them up (as an experiment of course), Russia may even get fed-up enough to do it for us….soon.
This guy seems to believe what he is saying, but how can it be?
.
Isn’t it interesting how good ol Des from Major Crime has willingly used ground penetrating equipment at this site yet still continues to dismiss any investigation at Max McIntyre’s property at Stansbury??? Poor old Des nearly had to change his underwear when he accidentally met up with some vigilante’s that were doing his work at another site of interest! His voice is pressured……he knows dammed well that the Beautmont children were not at the Castalloy site! Gee, he didn’t even mention how they moved the fence! By the way, I met up with one of Mrs Beautmont’s friends recently, unfortunately she has dementia.
While not personally affected by such specific experiences as you have brought to our attention, this is shocking and disturbing.
Thank you Mary, and further to Tony’s and Terry’s (et al) posts …
I hadn’t heard of these ‘Protocols’ until very recently and found them equally disturbing. For ANYONE to come up with such text, even if a ‘forgery’ (i.e. good copy of original) shows the level of depravity and pure evil that gave rise to such a document.
A link to The Protocols
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_zion06.htm#menu
One introduction to these ‘Protocols’ came from being inquisitive about the life of Henry Ford. It so happens, and I had no idea, that he wrote a book called “The International Jew” for which he and his family was vehemently hounded and persecuted. The extended version was published as a series in The Dearborn Independent in 1920:
Quoting:
”At any rate, in the American Hebrew of June 25, 1920, Herman Bernstein writes thus: “About a year ago a representative of the Department of Justice submitted to me a copy of the manuscript of ‘The Jewish Peril’ by Professor Nilus, and asked for my opinion of the work. He said that the manuscript was a translation of a Russian book published in 1905 which was later suppressed. The manuscript was supposed to contain ‘protocols’ of the Wise Men of Zion and was supposed to have been read by Dr. Herzl at a secret conference of the Zionist Congress at Basle. He expressed the opinion that the work was probably that of Dr. Theodor Herzl. … . He said that some American Senators who had seen the manuscript were amazed to find that so many years ago a scheme had been elaborated by the Jews which is now being carried out, and that Bolshevism had been planned years ago by Jews who sought to destroy the world.”
Here is an excerpt article
http://eindtijdinbeeld.nl/EiB-Bibliotheek/Boeken/The_International_Jew_by_Henry_Ford.pdf
“In an interview published in the New York World February 17, 1921, Mr. Henry Ford put the case for the “Protocols of Zion” tersely and convincingly. He said: “The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is that they fit in with what is going on. They are sixteen years old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.””
If you think that’s interesting, you should find out what people like Napoleon, Solzhenitsyn, Gerard Menuhin (and even Vladimir Putin) have to say on the topic.
References:
“Napoleon vs the Old and New World Orders” M. S. King
“200 Years Together” – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
“Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil” Gerard Menuhin
“The Holy New Martyrs and Confessors of Central Russia” – Vladimir Ross (see Protocol 17)
And for good measure:
https://youtu.be/cgaYag-XjTQ?t=190
Vladimir Putin: “You know, we have a really dark time in our country’s history, at the beginning of the Soviet era, where many believers were killed – not only Christian Orthodox, but also Muslims and representatives of other religions. The Soviet state, in its early stage, was very cruel to religious authorities. Many of our Churches were completely destroyed, our traditional religions denominations suffered massively.
But the role of the State is to protect the people.“
When Henry Ford said “They are sixteen years old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time. They fit it now.”, we only need to transpose this by another almost 100 years.
Henry Ford was in on the game( a George Soros type). Massive profits from war, he was turning out B24 bombers every 55 minutes from his factories. All most everyone got them, under the Lend Lease. Russia got a thousand underwritten by US taxpayer. Except Nazi Germany, who he was the biggest financier. War bonds and shelved patent payments just more gravvy.Just like the protocols, he played his manufactured sides.
The protocols could be part of the plan and not just the plan. Nicely letting the Freemasons off( all they had to do was die of natural causes). I’m suspicious of the whole Illuminarty breakaway story for the same reason.
Ford, Putin, Napoleon are Freemasons
There is a chapter in the ‘Controversy of Zion’ devoted to the ‘Protocols’. It is well worth reading –
http://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/Controversybook_eng_27.htm
Thanks Terry,
Was worth the read, and i liked the easy pdf link.
I can only say it would be fun to have a book club night on it.
Best Regards,
Great link – thank you Terry (and Simon)
A pdf download link for general interest
https://www.controversyofzion.info/Controversybook/reeedcontrov.pdf
Another related reference
The Jew, The Gypsy, and El Islam – Herbert S. Stone, (1898)
https://archive.org/details/TheJewTheGypsyAndElIslam/page/n3
Essential take (paraphrasing):
“The difference between Savagery and Barbarism is Religion.”
Here’s another one you may be interested in. It gives the background on the Ribbentrop-Molotov pact that started WWII.
‘The Red Symphony’ is a very long and boring read. It is a diary of various interrogations and observations of various personalities. I read the whole thing – the most interesting and important part was the ‘Interrogation of Rakovsky’. Even that is very long as it is a transcription of a lengthy tape. This link will shorten your reading to the important bits. – Prepare to go further down the rabbit hole…
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_rothschild08.htm
The Freemasons in London have opened their doors to the cameras for some PR — it is now a series on Netflix.
Wow, I’d be interested to see that! The Freemason Hall on North Tce Adelaide has tours on Thursday afternoons. I’ve been & it’s worth the visit. Who would have thought it has so many floors below street level! Creepy place!
Yes the below street level is typical of a lodge or any main church, synagog etc.
I staked one out, meetings nights for a year( Freemason lodge), in a typical western city of 2.4 million.
What I noticed is that required weekly meetings had nobody going in the main entrance or under the building car park even. Massive building(i had a birds-eye view) , always looked empty too, through observation over several years of frequent random visits as well.
Like churches most lodges are extremely well built and I find them all creepy (altars,gargoyles sick glasswork in churches). The Freemasons, symbols (logos) are not so obviously scary.
A Scottish Freemason who had “profited” from the New England had envisioned a parliament house (for the coming Federation) being in Tenterfield NSW. He built a magnificent structure in anticipation. You can stay there. You see the symbology in a bit more context here. I’m creeped out by its pervasiness and clear line back to Greek/Italian(the columns, Medusa etc{think Versace})and beyond, but others just can not see either its message/intent or its extreme quality of build, especially given the build date and location(isolated then). I’ve asked about the quality to Freemasons as well,they too appear to not appreciate a master craftsman work.
Anywho, I wanted to ask what did you find creepy in North Terrace, the subterranean catacomb, the vibe, symbols etc. I am curious to the creep you felt.
Cheers,
To Simon, “The protocols could be part of the plan and not just the plan.”
That makes sense to me although the material is sooo accurate. Whys did anyone let it be seen? Certainly a clue re “inoculations.” Wow. All I can think of is that it may have been meant to “test the waters.”
At Gumshoe we like to use Dr Day’s 1969 speech as our measuring stick. Would any newbies to this website please have a glance at this linked article which wraps up Dr Day’s 1969 speech.
(Hey, Dee, maybe Gumshoe could run a conference for the 50th “anniversary” of that speech.)
https://gumshoenews.com/2018/03/28/forgive-me-david-rockefeller/
I’ll try and “flesh it out” in future comments when context gives me opportunity.
Its a predictive programming(most hollywood movies have a dystopian type theme, why billions gets spend on recurring nonsence), designed to shape an outcome that would be unlikely to occur otherwise.
Think a scatter gun, then pick the winning horse later.(Orwell wins, Reed not this time). Charles Darwin gets picked, Herbert Spencer pushes it, and even though controversial at the time, try arguing that today.(you will get the jet aircraft condensation trail look).
David Rockefeller dabbles with being the winning horse, he thinks he’s a shoe in.
As well as sorry for the terrible joke, I may be having a Norwegian thought, Dr Day episode flashes possible red to me. You know, one guy remembers a speech no one else can, lighting strikes a horse. These stories are valuable to me though and I try to keep up.
To Helen Tastard, per the above:
Helen, may I comment on “immunity”? Yes, judicial officers have immunity from civil action. But they sure as hell don’t have immunity from prosecution for the crimes they commit, such as accessory to torture, perversion of the course of justice, etc.
I’m dying to see them prosecuted. If you decide to do a change.org petition on that, it’s best to disguise the names of the miscreants. In Oz, to say that a person committed a crime is defamatory; you could be sued.
But to file a sincere criminal complaint — with the real names — at the relevant police office is not defamation. In the US that’s also true of passing info about criminals to the local Grand Jury.
The change.org petition for your RC has 28,000 signatures. If those 28,000 people would file criminal complaints, wow.
The complaint need only say “I, ……., advise that Mr So-and-So appears to have committed the crime of Blah Blah. He lives at …(if you know). My address and phone number and email are as follows…. My evidence for this complaint is ………” (Keep it extremely concise.)
I am speaking here as a layperson, maybe incorrect. You could go to, or phone, the police or the so-called Crime-stoppers 1-800-333-000 just to ask how to go about making a complaint.
To get your courage up, why don’t you first PRETEND to write a complaint about someone having stolen the gnome out of your garden. After all, theft is theft, and we are all entitled to police protection. You’d need to say what date you think the gnome went missing and it can’t be beyond the statute of limitations — which is easily found for each state on Google.
Helen, I saw in Rachel Vaughan’s record of complaints she made, that the police issued her a File Record Number each time.
https://gumshoenews.com/2018/08/19/here-comes-the-avalanche-part-1-bodies-of-the-beaumont-children/
Small mercies are not to be sneezed at!
And here again is the law that claims to prevent your telling tales:
Family Law Act, 1975, section 121:
“A person who publishes in a newspaper …, or otherwise disseminates to the public or to a section of the public by any means, any account of any proceedings… under this Act that identifies:
• a party to the proceedings;
• a person who is … associated with, a party to the proceedings, or [is] in any other way concerned in the matter to which the proceedings relate is guilty of an offence punishable, upon conviction by imprisonment for a period not exceeding one year.”
(If you know anyone who ever dated your garden gnome, best to not mention.)
Helen, I have one more thing to say: Everyone may assume that the cops do not want to listen to your criminal complaints. But I suspect there are plenty of members of the police force who are longing for citizens to come foreword about this family-destruction stuff.
The Protocols, I think, are nothing more than a pragmatic recipe for the implementation of the Kabbalah. As several “insiders” have claimed; ‘Masonry is just a gentle introduction to the Kabbalah for gentile consumption.
I will also assert that Israel is but a quatermaster’s store of stolen technology overseen by a fairly reliable bunch of insanely narcissistic ideological (racial) supremacists who are the servants of the plutocracy centered in the “City of London” and their various “franchises” throughout the World, (like Washington DC (District of Columbia)) that is wholly owned by the secretocracy. Perhaps even more irksome is that all the Australian “governments” and their agencies are “corporations” registered in the “District of Columbia”. Don’t worry, however, as the “Crown” (the “City of London”) “owns” the lot.
No it doesn’t. Possession is nine-tenths of the law.
Should I assume that you will be assuring all the farmers, young families, small businesses etc. that have been goaded into taking impossible “loans” that the “one tenth of the law” will not screw them for everything that they have, or could have, for a “profit” for their shareholders and other profiteers?
In the olden days privateers (gov’t sanctioned pirates) had to take some physical risks to realise their booty.
These days I think that the privateers are farkn lawyers who use the “Law” to screw everyone but their ideological mates.
“The Soul Cries”
Yesterday I saw a ‘breaking news’ headline about the Serbian military being put on alert followed a ?NATO-backed terrorist incursion into an area where Serbia’s main hydroelectric power station is situated.
Who would have thought this event would be linked to the broad topics here!?
Here is an update article by Joaquin Flores (**) on Fort Russ.
IN DEPTH: SERBIA VS. ALBANIA, & “PIZZAGATE” – WILL THE HORRORS OF WAR RETURN TO THE BALKANS?
https://www.fort-russ.com/2018/09/in-depth-serbia-vs-albania-pizzagate-will-the-horrors-of-war-return-to-the-balkans/?utm_medium=ppc&utm_source=wp&utm_campaign=push&utm_content=new-article
The following comment by ‘Justin’ is worth citing – “My soul cries”
“Sad after reading of the sickness that prevails in the world and what has and is imposed on people. May this evil be stomped on and a light brought to shine on the scum that perpetrate such. Something that needs to be burned in to human consciousness for an eternity with full documentation so that we never forget the horrors that a minority do and are at pains to safeguard against such in the future.
At the moment though, my soul cries.
[…] Only by researching does one understand and see through the veil of lies that makes up the narrative of the West and the more one sees, the more one’s soul cries. All thanks to the Tribe.”
Please note associated links and references to Alexandr Dugin, Sheikh Imran Hossein, The Center for Syncretic Studies (CSS) and Katehon think tank – all worth exploring with an open and inquisitive mind.
** Joaquin Flores’ bio
https://www.patreon.com/JoaquinF
[…] some good news – namely, that the law itself is not written in as Snatcher-friendly way as I had suggested. The black-letter law supports the child — not the cops, not the bureaucrats, not your MP, […]
You all need to find the truth on Andrew McIntyre. You’ve only heard his story.
He has caused many atrocities on his own siblings …
seek the real truth …