Home Health Electromagnetic Frequency: Unite To Stop 5G

Electromagnetic Frequency: Unite To Stop 5G

12

Editor’s note: In a Melbourne newspaper a few days ago, there was an article called “Russian propaganda stoking 5G health fears.” Blame it on the Russians! But, this cogent 12-point argument (from Vermont) can fit onto an A4-size flyer. It gives a plain, helpful guide as to why no one wants the outrageous G5. Please print and circulate it as widely as possible, or link your friends to this GumshoeNews article. Why not call a meeting on your street?

by a group of activists in Vermont

1.  5G wireless could soon be deployed; infrastructure is stealthily being rolled out.  5G (fifth generation) wireless is being rolled out without public input or participation. It is industry and government driven. 5G radiofrequency/microwave (RF/MW) radiation, due to its proximity to homes, is orders of magnitude more in-tense than 4G radiation, which itself is very harmful to living beings. Such 24/7/365 exposure to weapons-grade MW radiation has thousands of scientists, doctors, engineers, and lawyers warning about impacts on health, environment, privacy, security, personal choice, and more.

Logo of 5GfreeVT

2.  5G has been proven hazardous to living beings. The ~ 25,000 scientific studies of RF/MW radiation bioeffects should result in the ban of 5G, but the telecommunications industry has escaped scrutiny. FCC guidelines apply only to RF/MW radiation exposures of 6 minutes or less, not 24/7/365. The US & UK allow radiation exposures up to thousands of times higher than gov’ts of most of the world’s industrial countries. Industry law- yers have stifled discussion of health effects and health science in public hearings.

3.  5G will produce severe health effects worldwide. Many people, injured by wireless radiation, suffer from Electromagnetic Sensitivity (EMS), a debilitating condition preventing them from using electronic devices. Exposing the world’s population to 5G radiation 24/7 would produce neurological, cardiac, immune, fertility, cancer, and other health problems in epidemic proportions. Every- one would be affected to some degree.

4.  5G is harmful to ALL life on Earth.  5G deploys MW radiation in wavelengths previously used only as weapons. Some wavelengths are optimally absorbed by the brain & heart, others by children & infants. Yet others by birds & bees. Maximum absorption means maximum harm. When 5G antennas are irradiating, escape is impossible. Pets, farm animals, wildlife, pollinators, & plant life would all be gravely affected.

5.  Scientists worldwide warn against 5G. As of September 2019, an international appeal for a moratorium on 5G had been signed by 250 scientists;  the 5G Space Appeal had gathered ~ 150,000 professional & other signatures; and nearly 200,000 people had written their officials to alert them to harm from 5G.

6.  5G tech junk would litter the landscape.  “Small cell” (5G) antennas emit irradiating power similar to large cell towers. They are to be sited very close to homes, or placed on street lights, utility poles, bus stops, sides of buildings, hills, or on any public property, where people would have full-on exposure when walking by, and would have to live with unsightly views.

5G coming to a home near you

7.  5G decreases property values.  Real estate studies have determined that property values decrease when cell phone towers are placed in neighborhoods.

8.  20,000 5G satellites are planned for launch. Concentrated microwave radiation is to be beamed over the entire Earth at all times, with no avoidance possible. Some have already been launched.

9.   You neither need nor benefit from 5G.  Fiber-optics cable wired to the home provides the safest, fastest, most secure internet. [Another view on fiber optics.] Wireless systems can facilitate data collection, allowing illegal privacy invasions and warrantless surveillance. Telecoms also have applied wired customers’ payments to wireless rollouts, which is fraud.

10.  5G will add to, not replace, current wireless systems. All fixed and mobile devices already work well. There is no good purpose for 5G deployment; it’s not necessary and would have dire consequences.

11.  State and local gov’ts. are under enormous pressures. Governing bodies are told to accept 5G equipment without time or resources to process applications.10However, some municipalities, states, and foreign jurisdictions are now resisting.

12.  Do you want a 5G antenna in front of YOUR home?

If not, PLEASE SPEAK OUT!

SHARE

12 COMMENTS

  1. Point 9 – We neither need nor will benefit from 5G – what we need is Truth, so the following is not off topic.

    I have always been impressed with Joaquin Flores of Fort Russ and the Centre for Syncretic Studies (CSS).

    Here Joaquin narrates this most profound CSS presentation which also offers a spark of hope.
    My favourite moment was at 12:26 with the screen depicting Buoncompagno De SIgna 1170 to 1250.

    It reads:
    • Fear God.
    • Honour your teacher.
    • Read incessantly.
    • Ask questions on what you do not understand.
    • Meditate deeply on what you have learned from your teacher.

    The first thing that grabbed my attention was that he was a contemporary of Fibonacci (same birth year)– the golden ratio – go figure!

    Critical Notices I – The Revolution Beyond Academia

    • I tried it, Fish. The monotonous tone of voice is bad enough, but I hate the way all those slides — so very pretty they are — are supposed to be evidence for what he is saying.

      I too like Flores, but where does he come into it? There’s just a “voice in the sky” here.

      My reaction (maybe due to my prejudice or ignorance) is that he is “back-strapolating.”

      So the Church had monopoly of manuscript-copying. Big dingo.

      Fish, now that you say it, “Honor your teacher” — makes me notice that we don’t go to our teachers anymore. We jab away at the search engines and find whatever we find.

      At 19.50 he promises to cover the occult in the next episode. Hmmm.

      • Noted.

        This is a new series and I am actually looking forward to seeing where he takes this topic.

        This episode was really to give historical context to the ways in which information and knowledge have been controlled, reproduced and disseminated over the centuries.

        I was quite impressed by his assertion that the likes of YouTube should not be allowed to monopolise the content and dissemination of information, and therefore ”knowledge”.

        Sometimes it helps to put a face to the (monotonous) voice.

        On the question of the occult (looking forward to that next CSS episode), I am also keen to get a copy of Robert Sepehr’s booklet “1666: Redemption Through Sin”.

        Here he reads the introduction on the fifth anniversary of its publication. There is some interesting commentary by David Icke (source link cited).

  2. What annoys me about this constant upgrading of ‘technology’ is the fact that the government’s allowing these invasive ‘upgrades’ never bother to ask the populace if they want these changes. Aren’t they supposed to be working for us?

    • Rachel, you say the government does not ask us. But is it really the “government”?

      Think of all the mayhem created by HAARP. — the uS gov’t does not sign off on it in any way (as far as I know) yet at one point it was operated by the Navy. And now by Raytheon?

      And to what extent does Government bother to oversee Google?

  3. No Rachel they are not working for us they are working for their respective political party’s ideology and foreign governments and foreign corporations. The Westminster system is not democratic and it is not a real representative government.

    The scam/scheme with our present Preferential voting system needs to be changed for the far more democratic Proportional Representation system.
    AUSTRALIA’S FRAUDULENT SYSTEM
    http://www.hotheads.com.au/voting.htm

  4. Besides the above there are far too many decisions that are being made by the Executive in their edicts and not being fully checked and balanced by the other two legislative arms of government.

  5. The privatisation of ‘government’ is a national security threat to any nation.

    5 Corporations Now Dominate Our Privatized Intelligence Industry
    https://www.thenation.com/article/five-corporations-now-dominate-our-privatized-intelligence-industry/

    SERCO WILL BE IN THE MIX AS WELL BEHIND ALL OF THE CORPORATIONS PORTFOLIOS
    https://www.cpsu.org.au/content/serco-secrecy-exposes-centrelink-privatisation-sham
    Chrissy Chat – Lets Muckety Around Serco

    https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=the+privaitsation+of++intelligence+of+the+US+government

    What could go wrong as Australia privatises visa processing
    https://www.themandarin.com.au/99686-privatising-visa-processing-the-alarm-bells-are-ringing/

  6. Dear Arlyn, The Editor tells me that besides your 5 comments printed here, there were another 5 that she blocked. That means she had to spend time reading all ten. This is not fair, her resources are verrry stretched.

    Clearly you have amassed a stock of links — probably many valuable ones. I suggest you make them available as a whole, on a new website. The entire set-up can be done in less than a day. Gumshoe is built on WordPress. You can get the free kind or the paid kind. Dee pays more for some extra’s.

    Readers would be glad to see your “About Arlyn” page, your CV. I think you said you were a cop in the US. Then people could direct their remarks to you.

    I have asked all to announce “Off-topic” if they desire to tell us about something interesting (or urgent) that is unrelated to the discussion. Today’s topic happens to be the 5g rollout.
    “Serco” could occupy another whole article. I feel that if you engage our minds about Serco, it distracts from the Gumshoe’s community discussion on 5G.

    • Dear Arlyn,
      Took awhile for me to see your genuine. I like when you comment from your own experience and interpretations of the links you provide.
      Links are good and you pick them well, but too many are overload in the context of comments.
      We are all trying to influence the false narratives that surround us, and I think you could get a better “hit rate”, by allowing discussions on the more likely reality of our current predicament, then once engaged, you could lay the links down to support your inferences.
      Just trying to help you get more traction and engagement. Seems we are few, so just trying to help you sharpen those astute claws of yours.
      Mary was a bit harsh although we all must have thick skin with our vocal contrarian stance, so modify and keep going till the truth rings out.
      Kindest Regards
      Simon

      Ps, 5g’s weakness is it requires huge amounts of power and a tight clustering of ‘nodes’.The back end is completely dependent on the clients being able to communicate in real time, and routing distance is the achilles heel of this oracle. Whose on the ground, us and the goat/sheeple/fifth colum. I’m hoping a bridge to far.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.