Home Australia Family Court Survey, Part 5: State Kidnapping, and the Child Exploitation Industry

Family Court Survey, Part 5: State Kidnapping, and the Child Exploitation Industry

38
(Adapted photo: The Vibrant Heart and apworld.com)

by Dee McLachlan

I posted the raw data from the Survey yesterday (2 January, 2019). It recorded responses from people whose children had been sexually abused, and how their case was treated in the Family Court in Australia.

What can I say? The results of the Survey are truly shocking. An atrocity played out every day in courts and in child protection departments across Australia.

“Horrendous” vs Not-to-be-believed.

On January 1, 2019, the Herald Sun ran a headline: “Girl indecently assaulted during New Year’s Eve celebrations in Melbourne.” According to the Herald Sun:

“A young girl [younger than a teenager] was sexually assaulted in Flinders St just after midnight in the middle of the New Year’s celebrations… [she] was with her family at the time when the incident occurred…

“[Deputy Commissioner Shane Patton] did not describe the circumstances of the assault, or provide the girl’s age, but said the offending was ‘horrendous‘.”

I’m sure it was. We have no details. Was she grabbed and fingered? I would be interested to know what the Deputy Commissioner would describe as horrendous.

But let me describe another truly horrendous assault on a young girl (younger than 9-years-old). She was cut in the rectum by her pedophile abuser — this disclosed to a police officer. She was also threatened with her life. The account by this young girl is easily proven.

But that incident was not described as HORRENDOUS. The judge actually said it was “just not credible.”

Welcome to the Family Court.

Before I discuss the Survey results, lets compare Australia with the US.

US — Child Trafficking

Michael Dolce is the author of a Newsweek article entitled: “WE HAVE SET UP A SYSTEM TO SEX TRAFFIC AMERICAN CHILDREN.” I agree, they have. To quote:

“The frequency of child sex abuse is a true epidemic. Since at least 2000, the U.S. Department of Justice has reported that some 67 percent of all sexual assaults are committed against victims under 18 years old… child sexual abuse cases number approximately 58,000 per year in recent years…

“Here’s the ugly truth: most Americans who are victims of sex trafficking come from our nation’s own foster care system. It’s a deeply broken system… Most people don’t know about our nation’s foster care to sex trafficking pipeline…”

Consider the now deceased Georgia Senator Nancy Schaefer, and how she fought against the CPS abuse and corruption. She was a leading voice against the CPS abuses, until she was murdered — in what authorities say was a murder suicide committed by her husband. Sure! (see govtslaves.)

In 2007, Nancy Schaefer wrote a report to the Georgia Assembly that detailed the abuses she uncovered:

“… I believe Child Protective Services nationwide has become corrupt and that the entire system is broken almost beyond repair.

“The Department of Child Protective Services, known as the Department of Family and Children Service (DFCS) in Georgia and other titles in other states, has become a “protected empire” built on taking children and separating families.

“This is not to say that there are not those children who do need to be removed from wretched situations and need protection. This report is concerned with the children and parents caught up in “legal kidnapping,” ineffective policies, and DFCS who do does not remove a child or children when a child is enduring torment and abuse.” [The report]

Welcome to the Family Court of Australia. The exact same thing is happening here — and it is no less than straight-out ABDUCTION.

Australia’s State Kidnapping

Kidnapping? In the few cases I have now investigated, there is no other word to describe what has happened. Children have been unlawfully removed by the State. I obtained a professional opinion on one case. This person pointed out judicial imprudence, and so many procedural errors, that the removal of the child should NEVER have happened.

I’ve looked through all the details, and it is abundantly clear that the protective mother’s lawyer was not working for her. In this instance, the decisions by the department and the court are so extraordinary and bizarre, one has to presume that the judge, the attorney, the police officer, the DCP social worker, the ICL (“independent children’s lawyer,”), and the abuser were all working in concert!

Summary of the Survey — My Analysis

Who DID believe children?  Family members mostly (58 out of 71). Only 2 judges believed the child. 49 people said the judge did not believe their child’s disclosures. Wow this is so extraordinary that family court judges did not believe the children.

Yet in more than half the cases in the Survey, the child had disclosed his/her plight to 7 or more people.

The time and money spent fighting the system is staggering, too. Nearly half lost a home trying to fund their pursuit of safety for the kid.

97% of the responders said crucial evidence was disregarded. 56% actually reported that evidence was DESTROYED. 17 people said the Judge destroyed the evidence, or ordered that evidence be destroyed.

53 (of 66 who answered the question) said a psychiatrist claimed that they were “coaching” (i.e., trying to sway or enhance the child’s version), and 43 believed someone in authority was trying to “coach” their child to admit to less, or no abuse.

The responders reported that many people CHANGED, or FALSIFIED REPORTS. This included: the police (17), Social workers (12), Child Protective Services (26), ICL — independent child lawyer (28), Court reporters (25), Court-appointed psychiatrist (16), Court appointed experts (15), and judges (21).

34 responders claim to have physical evidence of this corruption. I can only say that there seems to be an acceptance (a culture) of modifying reports.

And then there’s STATE BLACKMAIL.

To my question, “What “punishment” would be put on you, if you did bring forward more accounts or evidence of abuse? Most answers were simple: If they persisted with abuse claims, nearly all were threatened that they’d “never see their kids again.”

I hope you are beside yourself after reading that. I certainly was horrified. How dare the state make such a threat!

Almost everyone was put into debt by this process, but in my trick question, “If you only had ONE choice — what OUTCOME would you vote for?” hardly anyone ticked that they wanted financial compensation. Most wanted prosecutions and jailings – preferring this also over a Royal Commission.

And what about the children?

In a question about the emotional state of the child, 65 people answered the question. 73% (48) said their children now had behavioral problems (e.g., anger); 16 kids had run away (24.6%); 32, nearly 50% (49.23%) were suicidal or had talked about suicide, and 38% (25) were in fear of their lives.

Could it get any worse?

Conclusions

The departments of child protection and the family court are carefully constructed to protect pedophile behaviour, and in doing so the system becomes a safe-haven for child exploitation, local child trafficking, satanic activities, and most likely it is protecting a child porn industry.

In reading the written answers, there was a common factor: that persons representing the courts and departments acted against the protective parent. Was this because they chose not to believe the child? No, I don’t think so. In some cases the abuse is so obvious. So, I think many in authority did believe that abuse occurred, but acted against the child anyway. There are definitely other factors at play. Money for exploitation could be one.

However, one important aspect emerged in reading some of the notes, and by talking to some of the responders personally. They recall those that acted against them seemed to have got significant gratification when they succeeded in tearing the child away from them — the protective parent. (I chose the word gratification with care, as this best describes what I was told. Definition: “a source of pleasure, or great satisfaction.”) This is seriously disturbing behaviour from those working in child “protective” services.

Another comment was that those in the system treat this as a “game.”

Satanic Activities: When constructing the questions for the survey, I decided not to delve into the subject of ritual abuse – meaning abuse that occurs during a rite or ritual, most of which have to do with satanic or Luciferian cults.  The Prime Minister, however, in his October 22, 2018 apology to the victims did say that many were victims of ritual abuse. I will have to let the reader speculate on the likelihood that the sex-trafficking I discovered has some element of Satanism in it from the written responses.

To modify Dolce’s Newsweek title, the title of this article could be: “WE HAVE SET UP A SYSTEM TO SEX TRAFFIC AUSTRALIAN CHILDREN.”

Quashing Section 121

Section 121 of the Family Law Act is, I believe, the kicker. It tells Australians that they must not divulge any proceedings that are before the Family Court.

Can this mean we must not reveal governmental crime?  As Mary W Maxwell is fond of pointing out in her Gumshoe articles, “It is a crime to prevent the reporting of crime.”

Every politician in Canberra who has now seen the results of The Survey should hasten to repeal Section 121.  They must stop gagging protective parents, which is a mechanism for concealing  imprudence, malfeasance and criminality.

I know several people have written to State Ministers of Child Protection over a dozen times with desperate pleas, but never got a response. They don’t seem to care for children.

I can see the court punishing — as they do — one protective parent for speaking out. If 5 people speak out it becomes a problem. Canberra would most likely put out a rebuttal of some sort. If 20 people spoke out, it would become political talking point. But if 50 people spoke out simultaneously, then it would a political crisis.

One Suggestion

I suggest that someone be assigned to confirm 50 people who are willing to go public.

They should prepare video testimony, statutory declarations, and documentation that allege malfeasance in each case — these to be uploaded to a private website.

Then on an arranged date those many persons should violate Section 121 and go PUBLIC — via arranged press conferences (streamed live) across the main cities in Australia — timed with the website going live.

I may be wrong, but could Australia and its representatives ignore 50 cases (or more) of malfeasance and alleged criminality by the police, the departments of child protection and the family court, and not change things?

This will prove who they are representing.

And what would happen if the website remained ‘open’ and transparent for further aggrieved persons? The government would not only have to deal with an army of angry parents, but would have to contend with a well-deserved public lashing.

SHARE

38 COMMENTS

  2. My advice on publication has been to publish overseas as Australian defamation, contempt laws etc do not apply. Viz the prominent Aussie whose conviction was suppressed here but published overseas.

      • Agreed lifting 121 and taking it offshore provides the families that speak out with a chance to be heard and in a collective group the strength in numbers has to have an impact and provide solace as well as giving back to the survivors .that have been lost are broken and grieving . How dare these ingrained systemic operators rule over survivors . Lift the gag order .

  3. I am quoting Dee above:

    To my question, “What ‘punishment’ would be put on you, if you did bring forward more accounts or evidence of abuse?” Most answers were simple: If they persisted with abuse claims, nearly all were threatened that they’d ‘never see their kids again’.”

    Sorry but I couldn’t help noticing the similarity to Carleen Bryant’s moment of “betrayal” of her son Martin (forced betrayal).

    Attorney John Avery — surely acting under instructions from Higher Up — ordered her to say to Martin that he must plead guilty to the Port Arthur massacre, or his mother and sister could not see him again.

    Think about it, Folks. PARENTS IN AUSTRALIA ARE STANDARDLY TOLD THAT IF THEY REPORT THE CRIME OF CHILD ABUSE THEY — AND THE KID — WILL BE PUNISHED IN THE MOST AWFUL WAY.

    Note: If Carleen had disobeyed it probably would have had a happy ending. But if today’s Protective parents disobey they will indeed LOSE THEIR KID AND POSSIBLY NOT SEE HIM/HER AGAIN.

    So what are you going to do about this?

    • Oops. In case there is any confusion:

      I was not referring to the outrageous fact that parents are forbidden by the putrid Section 121 to refrain from speaking openly about their case. I mean they are told – usually by their lawyer – that they must not report the stuff to the judge. They should bite their lip.

      And that is not to be confused with another set-up that dovetails with this, namely that if they walk into the police station, the POLICE are instructed – for no good reason — to say “We can’t investigate the abuse if the matter is before the family court”

      My God what a perfect Catch 22.

  4. Amanda, I don’t get it about the contempt law not applying. The Mum or Dad is right there in an Oz court and the judge can cite for contempt if the person defies HIM.

    I could be wrong. Anybody know?

    But Amanda, I favor your attitude — STOP OBEYING ABSURD RULES.

    Re the “Famous Person”, the issue is not defamation. That will come. It is an established rule that the accused (re his next charge) should not be dragged thru the mud prematurely.

    Right now the appeal in Boston of the Marathon case is proceeding along the lines of “Jahar did not get a fair trial because he was pre-judged.”

    I think that is silly. He did not get a fair trial because his Defender said “Hey look at that guilty client of mine” or words to that effect.

  8. Another email confirming the Family Court orchestra:

    “…all of the court officials were working in concert, and as for out attorney he gave us no advice at all, he knew he had thrown us under the bus…”

    • Genuine ? How can you be so sure?

      More than anything I’m struck by the absence of the Mother’s testimony. It’s also unclear as to what exactly she was charged with and by whom. The Father’s testimony and the Judge’s summary are far too broad and fuzzy-wuzzy to come to any sort of cogent conclusion about anything. Classic example of the way in which the entire reprobate system is being held together

      • Thank you, Berry, I stand corrected. I should have said “seems to me to be genuine.”

        Now what I want to know is, since she sentenced her to prison, is that the outer reach of a contempt citation, or is this a criminal court?

        Does Aus fed court (of which Fam-court is a part) act as a criminal court and if so, where is due process?

        Does aus have a crime called “parental alienation”?

  11. I’m overwhelmed by the support Gumshoe News has given us protective parents of the Family Court!!! I also acknowledge & appreciate the time & commitment Dee has put in in regards to the Survey!!! Let’s tell the world about Australia’s dirty little secret, that the police are complicit to crimes when it involves child sexual abuse, lawyers are advising NOT to report (or you WILL) lose custody, Judges NOT even getting close to putting the child’s best interest to heart & the Child Protection system stealing children from their protective parents. It is a cesspool & our children are suffering NOW!!!

  12. Love the articles so articulately and factually written with in your face truths. Let’s get those 50 who will push this through.

    • I think you will have to get them, NMC.

      The most I can ask is for folks to show up at my Fringe play in Adelaide on Sunday March 17 at 2pm. Burnside Ballroom, 403 Greenhill Rd, Tusmore. Very leafy. An amplitude of parking. Or take the 147 Beaumont bus from Ibis Hotel and alight at Stop 10.

      But that is not the 50 plan. Y’all have to organize that.

      Suggestion: One of you can suddenly develop a birthday and need to use the birthday function room at the local McDonald’s.

      Let’s say you can get only 2 Protective Parents in Newcastle. No worries; Her Surveymakership runs a side job as a cinematographer and will know how to meld the Newcastle group into the Melbourne group.

      That settles it, NMC. You are in charge. If you send “acceptance” to mclachlandee @ gmail.com, she will give you a further idea.

      (I know a guy in Sydney who wants to carry a sign “Eff 121”.)

  13. Here is our friend Don Rufty again. I suggest you start at 20 minutes. The first few minutes there are audio problems and up till 20 minutes it is parochially American. You go, Don!
    .

  15. Dear Community, here is something a bit different. It’s an ABC program that has had almost 2 million hits. About a guy who ran Internet porn. But listen to the cops talking as if they care about the abused kids. Well that’s a bit refreshing.

    In case you missed it in the above video by Don Rufty, he says he was approached by a cop who knew of Don’s work in fighting the CPS racket. The cops said he and other cops don’t like what they are told to do (grabbing kids).

    I find this helpful. We need to do outreach to police. One of the cops in this film is Jon Rouse (Qld i think). Anybody game to write to him? i have to tell you that at the moment Dee and I are each overcommitted. We mostly can only do publishing not door-knocking. Sad to say.

    One thing that needs doing is that bad doctors, judges, and lawyers need to be reported to police if they do anything criminal on the job. Just ignore the lesser punishment of disbarring — that is all “in the family.” perhaps it will have no effect for you to write to police but it is better than nothing. And then do NOT publish your complaint. Accusing someone of a crime is libel in Oz.

    I think we should assume that the bad guys’ grip is being broken and that we are in a mop-up operation. Always focused on saving kids before it is too late.

  16. This is so spot on! Been going on for years and getting worse by the day! The systems are also all entwined in this corruption! CPS Family courts,police, education and health! So many children are being medically kidnapped unlawfully. I am elderly now and so glad. I would probably try and stay clear of the hospitals, even if I had to take out health insurance, so I could use private hospitals if I needed to! All public hospitals are now stealing children. You only gave to look at the sentences handed down to these paedophiles to wake up what is going on?

  18. I know of thousands of cases in U.S. where the family Court takes child from protective mother whwn the child is being sexually abused by the father. The mother loses all including the child she has desperately tried to protect. The more evidence of sexual abuse even physical evidence courts force child to live w abuser. I have been fighting this epidemic for over 25 years and deal with it everyday . Important Read ” PROSECUTED BUT NOT SILENCED” Proof of what is happening! Research and Legal! https://www.amazon.com/dp/1683507800
    Best, Maralee Mclean
    National Speaker APB, Author, Writer. Child Advocat

    • Yes, Maralee is correct. I’ve been living this nightmare for 10 years now. Just learned my petition for emerg. custody and two medical records confirming sexual abuse of my then 9 year old daughter has been removed from my court file.

  19. Dee unable to open link–some sign re Gateway?? so I closed computer and started again–the sign came up again when I tried to get into gumshoe site so I used bgumshoenews –but still could not open link

  20. If only we’d known years ago.

    Judges,Politicians, prosecutors and Child Protective Services? It’s not just in Australia. Here’s a link from California. Same modus operandi.

    https://patch.com/california/lamorinda/tale-two-little-barbies-victims-foster-care-system

    Anyone remember Dr.Patrick Power (Senior NSW State Prosecutor ) convicted of having “the highest and most degrading” form of child porn on his Government-Issued laptop and his boss, Gregory Eugene Smith, the one time NSW Attorney General and Minister for Justice? Refresh your memories.

    Justice is coming and nothing will stop it.

    • Thanks Phil. We would bot have guessed that California has 56,000 children n FORSTER CARE or that a pimp can make $49,000 off a child over her time in foster care.

      Here is a quote:
      “Martha* was taken from her home in August 2017, when she was 7 years old. Judge Lois Haight blocked Martha’s* mother from all visitation with Martha until March 2018. In visitations with her mother, Martha* repeatedly begs to come home to her mother. Her mother has noticed, since mother has now weekly visitation, that Martha* has bruises on her body.

      Martha* has remarked that she is frequently going hungry and there is very little food available at the foster home. Martha’s* mother pays child support yet Martha* said her allotted weekly allowance has been with held by the foster mom since June 2018. Because of this Martha* can not purchase snacks at school. At the foster home, the biological daughter of the foster mother had died in a drowning accident”

      But Phil did you notice that Judge Lois Haight in this case is “on recall”? That’s a help.

  23. This happened to me in Newcastle Family Court, NSW.

    My children were given to their pedo dad.

    Dr Brent Waters was the court appointed shrink.
    He lied and also shook my daughter and threatened her when I went to the toilet.
    Her brother was there. He was being sued for doing the same thing to a boy ten years prior.

    My solicitor did not bring in any of my witnesses.

    DOCS lied and threatened my family counsellor, the only witness my solicitor did call. He went against me because he had a new job with DOCS and they had threatened to sack him if he didn’t speak against me.

    I didn’t realise at the time that my Pedo brother (who had molested me and my siblings),had got a job in DOCS, Sydney. And my ex had buddies up to him.

    That’s the short version.

    After that, I met a woman who had been through QLD family court.

    Her ex and his father ran a pedo ring and we’re using hers sons. It was all documented by DOCS.
    In court, they said there was no file.

    The judge has all the microphones turned off and was vile to her, of course he gave the boys to pedo Dad.

    One son is now in his twenties and a father. His Amy’s is torn and his feces leaks.

    The other is the father of a little girl.
    The mother of the child is his own fathers wife.
    Yep, his step mother was rooting him and had his child, he was a teen at the time.

    It’s much worse than I have outlined.

    • Try threat to go to Jail by the Judge if complaints continued. A grandmother. Threats to the mother of Jail and losing her little one forever if she didn’t hand the child over to the abuser. The Judge in his Reasons stated the toddler had been sexually abused, had freely disclosed, but still threatened the Grandmother. Ordered the Grandparents not see the child for 1 year as punishment? for reporting abuse. Still gave the abuser unsupervised shared care . Child and baby rape by a parent is unofficially Legal in this country Australia. And the abusers know it and know they will not be caught no matter what is done to the child. They know they will be allowed unfettered access to the child or baby. Disgusting. Unacceptable. Filthy pigs. All I can say.

  26. This is to MARY MAXWELL:

    I read a recent article you wrote about the “MATRIX” occurring with CPS, foster care, and adoptive parents. You indicated that your next Article would be on the “MATRIX” in Family Court. I am awaiting this Article. I’m going to send to government and judges, and anyone who will possibly read it. We know it’s the same theory as the CPS System, right? Thanks Mary. You can email me anytime at sbmotheroftwo@gmail.com. I also just learned the evidence that proved my 9 year old daughter was sexually abused in 2009 has been removed from the court file. I would like to expose this. Can you help me do so?

    Thanks for your Article Dee. You are a brave soul. God bless you and keep you.

    Suzanne

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.