by Mary W Maxwell, LLB
Some men are shy. Some men are weak. Some men are strong. Some men are fearless.
Meet South Australian Andrew McIntyre — fearless.
As we will see, Andrew, who is now 64, has tried exhaustively to tell anyone who would listen that he knows who killed the Beaumont children, and why. The jig is now up. His story can be denied no more.
By the greatest of luck – thank you, Parliament; thank you, Letters Patent from the Queen — Australia has had four-year’s worth of hearings of the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. That commission was a priceless exercise. Its main result is that THE HABIT OF LYING IS EXPOSED.
I hereby declare it is no longer possible to use platitudes, spin, gobbledygook and other means of hiding facts. Those who continue attempt to do so will look like utter fools. Yay!
Australia Has Broken the Barrier
This article shouts to the world that “we done it.” Isn’t that great?
In Oz, we’ve got Fiona Barnett who has been through the “standard torture.” (What am I saying!) We’ve got Diane DeVere who connects the dots of Oz’s Tavistock like nobody’s business. We’ve got octogenarian Denis Ryan – the only honest cop fighting the wicked Catholic hierarchy (What am I saying!). We’ve got Rachel Vaughn, and many more who refuse to be silenced.
A Terrible Day in History
As described in Part 1, the three Beaumont children went to Glenelg Beach on Australia Day, January 26, 1966. They simply “disappeared.” Allegedly no one saw them after that afternoon, but that is not true. We should all be ashamed of what transpired over the last 52 years to keep the children’s parents in the dark and to keep the people of Adelaide guessing,
Media persons say that there were many theories to explain what happened. But no “theories” were needed! Please feel free to be a bit suspicious of anyone who pushed any particular theory — as they may have been part of the cover-up.
The fact is that THE POLICE KNEW ALL ALONG what had happened. Instead of theorizing, just ask the man in charge of SAPOL to open the safe and read the nitty gritty. (SAPOL is the brand of the South Australian Police. Cool, huh?)
The Media Think They Can Run Our Lives
This new stuff about the Beaumont case is of major importance and below I will lay it on thick as to how the media continued to misrepresent or minimize the truth.
You may be asking “How can Mary Maxwell NOW be sure that she’s found the right reporter of the day’s events, i.e., Andrew?”
I can tell by the constant efforts made to douse his story. Below I will display an article from the Sydney Morning Herald that would strike you as fair – unless you were aware of the parade of bedbug letters sent to Andrew’s sister Rachel, (See Part 1 of this series).
Luckily Rachel recorded some phone conversations she had with officials. It is NOT POSSIBLE that those officials were being kosher.
Oh, how we fell for the governmental line! Oh, what an easy ride the Powers That Be have had, given our natural inclination to show respect for our – quote unquote – “leaders.”
Think for a minute of what a police officer is supposed to be:
One — a helper of distressed citizens
Two — a wearer of a uniform and badge that signals authority
Three — a guy who knows a lot more than you know about the behaviour of organized crime or whatever
Four — a representative of the law and thus, more generally, of government.
Although Andrew McIntyre had solved the case of the murder of the Beaumont children many years ago, “SAPOL” had sufficient prestige with the population of SA – including moi – to be able to belittle any evidence he presented.
Gall Is Where You Find It
Above, I used the adjective “fearless” to describe Andrew. He has gall. In a Gumshoe article entitled “All gall is divided into three parts,” I mentioned that some people called me fearless in regard to the 2018 Watertown lecture. It’s not true; I’m as fearful as anyone else. Probably McIntyre also has the usual physiological symptoms of being scared stiff, but he nevertheless plows on. THANK YOU, ANDREW.
The Cabal
As GumshoeNews readers are by now well aware, there is a layer of “rulership” in the human race that is higher than the various national governments. We can easily trace this “cabal” back to 1913 and it may have been in place well before that. Secrecy is their mainstay.
The point that’s relevant to the Beaumont story is that it must be this cabal that lent sufficient authority to the SA police and the SA media to turn the law upside down. That’s their now-famous specialty.
It is said that the cabal (also called The Deep State) can do this almost effortlessly because they’ve already got their puppets appointed to all the key positions in society. The various police officials and media persons in SA would simply “know their duty.” Not to the people, of course, but to their overlords.
In the last few years many commenters at Gumshoe have claimed that the police do not work for us. I was sceptical but I am no longer sceptical. Rachel Vaughn’s collection of letters – not just about the Beaumont case but about current instances of pedophilia – tell me that the police have other bosses.
Of course, the Wood Royal Commission in NSW already clarified that back in1995, but now we see it must be Australia wide. What a pity.
The Outrageous Tammy Mills Article
I will now show the mutual support that the media and the police engage in.
Just over a year ago, on June 8, 2017, Tammy Mills published an article in The Sydney Morning Herald, “Boy’s diary puts paedophile near beach when Beaumont children disappeared.”
She’s referring to the fact that Andrew submitted a diary that a certain person (Tony Munro) used to record his diving experiences and so forth. Andrew had made a few contributions to that diary, thus he could authenticate its date and author and so forth.
I am going to reprint here much of that SMH article. You will see how, despite a promising headline (after all, news of the Beaumont children is always a popular topic in Adelaide), it all comes down to nothing.
See how Journo Tammy Mills lets every attempt by police to override Andrew’s story shine forth as a reasonable response.
I urge you to watch these tactics and memorize them, so when you see those same tactics appearing elsewhere you will have zero willingness to fall for it.
[The rest of this page is taken from SMH.com.au. By Tammy Mills]:
“A child’s diary that puts a convicted paedophile on Glenelg beach in the days surrounding the Beaumont children’s disappearance there in January 1966 has been handed to Adelaide detectives.
“The ‘salvage and exploration club’ diary was kept by one boy, and contributed to by another, tracking their adventures diving off the Adelaide coast that summer.
“The dives regularly involved one of their fathers, Allan ‘Max’ McIntyre, and family friend Anthony Alan Munro, who will be sentenced in August for abusing boys in 1965. … Anthony Alan Munro has admitted abusing children in the 1960s.”
[Sounds pretty hot right there, doesn’t it? The phrase “in the 1960s kinda makes you think of 1966.]
“Mr [Andrew] McIntyre says the diary is evidence that his father and Munro were frequenting Glenelg beach in the days before Jane, Arna and Grant Beaumont went missing there on Australia Day 1966 in one of the country’s most infamous mysteries….
“A copy of the diary was handed to major crime investigators by South Australian investigative journalist Bryan Littlely, who urged police to seek the original copy from the main diary writer, to whom he had spoken.”
[Hot, hot hot]
“In his statement to police as part of the investigation into Munro’s abuse, Mr McIntyre alleged his father, now in his late 80s, and Munro, now 72, were involved in the Beaumonts’ disappearance.”
[The offending Dad has since died, in November 2017.]
“… ‘I believe Tony and Max were involved in the disappearance of the Beaumont children.’ Max McIntyre, a former Telecom worker, was investigated over the disappearance after one of his daughters, Ruth Collins, made the allegations back in 2007.”
[Makes you wonder what that ‘investigation” consisted of. Why was he not indicted with the crime right away and let a jury sort it out?]
“Police found no evidence he was involved.”
[Oh, I see. By the way, how do you “find no evidence.”]
“Munro, who lived in Glenelg in 1966, was interviewed about the Beaumonts after he was arrested for the abuse of boys last year. Again, police found no evidence.”
[Not even the evidence that maybe, just maybe, a pedophile who is a pedophile might be pedophilng around town in more than just one instance?]
“In an interview with Littlely in 2015, Mr McIntyre [senior] denied his own involvement and pointed the finger at Munro.”
[Wow! Hotter than hot. Tony Munro got blamed by an eyewitness. Hello? Any developments there in the legal proceedings?]
“Munro’s lawyer, Stephen Ey, dismissed the allegations.”
[In case any citizen out there reading this doesn’t know, it’s not for a defendants’ lawyer to “dismiss” allegations, OK? A judge who has heard both sides can dismiss it. Attorney Stephen Ey is entitled to “scoff at it,” “call it a bunch of lies” or whatever. Wait, I see ‘dismiss’ was Tammy’s word. I guess she wants us to think the matter is dismiss-worthy. Why does she want that?]
“The ‘police who interviewed Munro were satisfied he had nothing to do with it. It’s the fanciful ravings of Ruth Collins,’ Mr Ey said on Wednesday.”
[Maybe Ruth is just as fearless as her Bro Andrew; I don’t know. Being called a person with fanciful ravings is pretty bad when you know that your fanciful ravings are plain ordinary facts, albeit slightly grisly facts, murder being slightly grisly, and triple murder – the entire progeny of Mr and Mrs Beaumont – being… um…what can one say?… .]
“‘Police have undertaken many actions and lines of inquiries in relation to this matter … there is no evidence at all to support these claims,’ the police spokeswoman said.”
[At this point, it would be nice of journalist Tammy Mills to give us some of the particulars of the “extensive investigation.” Does she really believe it? If she has doubts, you’d never guess.]
“But the diary, Ms [Ruth] Collins and her brother said, supports their assertion that the pair [meaning the pair of grownups] were at Glenelg beach that day.
“In a statutory declaration, Mr McIntyre claimed he was meant to go with his father and Munro to Glenelg beach to do some diving, but was told to stay home and they went with other young men.”
[A statutory declaration in South Australia is a lesser cousin to a sworn affidavit.]
“He said when they came home, both were upset, his father had his hands on his head saying ‘s—, s—, s—‘.”
[Well you would, wouldn’t you.]
“Mr McIntyre claims there was sand and blood in Munro’s car.
His sister [Ruth] goes even further. She says her father came home wearing a bloodied shirt and, extraordinarily, she claims she saw the children’s bodies in the back of the car.”
[Excusez moi, Tammy Mills, are you trying to indicate that the witnessing of dead bodies is “extraordinary” (yes, sure, it is, especially in regard to the half-century mysterious Beaumont children) or are you having a crack at the wild-raver Ruth here?]
“The siblings have demanded that a filled-in well on their father’s property outside of Adelaide be dug up, though the well remains undisturbed.”
[Clearly Tammy Mills knows a police anomaly when she sees one; that’s her job, isn’t it? Why is she leaving that amazing clue hanging – what the hell does that filled-in well now contain?]
“Mr Max McIntyre was unable to be reached for comment.”
[How hard did Tammy try? And did she contact Andrew, contributor to the diary that made for the exciting headline above?]
“The officer in charge of South Australia Police’s major crime unit, Detective Superintendent Des Bray, said dozens of people had been named as persons of interest over the years. These include notorious child killers Derek Percy, Bevan Spencer von Einem – who abducted, tortured and murdered the son of an Adelaide newsreader….”
[Poor Superintendent Des being deprived of solving Oz’s most famous murder case — and no doubt getting a medal for it — and going down in history as a great Aussie. Makes you wonder what led to Des’s promotion to Superintendent, doesn’t it?]
“Meanwhile, [Tony] Munro is awaiting sentencing after he pleaded guilty to abusing Andrew McIntyre and another boy between 1965 and 1983…. Munro moved to Cambodia to run a bar in the mid to late 2000s before he flew back to Adelaide last year to face the child abuse charges.”
[Tammy, have you ever known anyone who would move to Cambodia “to run a bar”? Maybe something interesting here for you to chase up on?]
Stay Tuned
Part 3 will knock you for a loop. Andrew has a secret that goes way beyond the story of children on a beach, way beyond body men, way beyond pedophilia.
[Note to Tammy Mills: See? You can build up excitement by promising to deliver what you’ve already got in hand, which you’ve already sussed out. You, not me, could be breaking this fantastic story.]
— Mary W Maxwell is co-author with Dee McLachlan of the 2015 book Truth in Journalism. Want a copy? Download it from the top menu, or write to mary.maxwell@alumni.adelaide.edu.au
Cathy Kezelman –should be added to your list of those who have broken down the walls telling first of her incestuous Fritzl type abuse and then of what is called RAMCOA and she has survived.
Ritual Abuse Mind Control and Organised Abuse–Valerie Sinason Alison Miller are experts in this brainwashing programming mind control—-Alison Miller Healing the Unimaginable Mind Control and Ritual Abuse.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/life/weekend-australian-magazine/the-disputed-memories-of-child-abuse-activist-cathy-kezelman/news-story/fb0b24837c3955ad1ff441029e88f7c3
Another Cathy. And thanks to you we have got Cathi Morgan’s permission to republish her Birth Trauma article, soon.
But don’t you feel, Diane, that we have now gone far enough on research — surely that list provided by Rachel Vaughn of politicians who did not reply tells us all we need to know about society’s paralysis.
We need to say “OK, we’re not having this anymore.”
Suggestion: rent a room in a community center (e.g., Burnside SA maybe $35 an hour) where pre-vetted citizens will gather to “ask questions” of police and of course several police officers have to be invited.
Refreshments will be served.
Shaking my head
Nothing else to say Rachel has serious mental health issues
Chapter 3 ? Ooooo how exciting !!! What is his secret ? That he loves Asian women ? We know this …. That’ he was busted for Mary Jane ? We know this ….. That he was friends with MUNRO until he was arrested. !!!! who cares about the McIntyre’s fantasy stories ….. old news in Australia ….. ASK RACHEL “ about the police statements being changed 👍👍👍👍 Ask her why Police have no interest in her fantasy stories It’s all a farce !!!!!!!
The list Rachel sent you on senators / mps ? The reason why they don’t get back to her is because there is ZERO in her stories It would be the end of their careers if they even considered listening to her jable, babble , hockey pockey , Mumbo , sadistic FANTASY stories
Hmm, I don’t know squat about all this, but me thinks he protests too much.
“he protests too much” ?
please explain
sorry, penny just dropped.
Didn’t grasp what you meant by “protest” because to me it’s just pure jibber.
Which doesn’t exactly bode well if you’re trying to convince an audience.
I should have used the actual quote from Hamlet – “The lady doth protest too much, methinks”
I’m
Not protesting !! I am so tired of the utter lies that flows from Rachel’s mouth !!! I can’t even feel sorry for her !!! Ask her about “ lousie Bell “ the somerton man
Her childhood is one big fantasy like the never ending story ….. something about those little pills the thrills … maybe she needs a higher dose to compensate the damage she’s inflicting not only on herself the entire Mcinttye Family !!!!
Hi Bobby longlegs, and others trying to trash Rachel.
I sadly realize that we are amidst an extended family feud — possibly. Sadly I see a lot of really HURT and possibly very damaged people. And that is sad. If it was one lone crazy voice — one has to consider that it may be “jable, babble”. When there are three voices from the family — that takes on a different hue of credibility (for us readers to consider).
I recall the very early days when people could not believe their priest could have harmed anyone. It was disbelief.
And to digress — We know also many of those families who lost sons, husbands or wives in the twin towers could never come to understand that the buildings were demolished purposefully. But for those like Bobby Mcilvaine who proved that an explosion killed his son in the lobby — not the plane, or collapse — he had to come to terms that his government killed his son. He is still a voice — a very sad, and brave one — demanding the truth. All these years later. Many of his friends (and family) find him to difficult to deal with.
The topic of child abuse and murder is obviously very hurtful — whatever side one may be. From a distance, SAPOL should consider every opportunity, especially from a person that may have been damaged by abuse. But comments are seemingly claiming that they would never consider the the views of three family members. Why?
New commenters must also consider that many Gumshoe readers are exceptionally well read — both in legal matters and history.
Take for example the mentally challenged so called “MASS KILLER mad man” Martin Bryant. Many Australians believe that “he is simply too monstrous to exist.“ But many readers here have studied the evidence over years / decades — and know 100% that it was impossible for him to have been the shooter in the cafe.
Thus we take evidence seriously; we look at the action or inaction by the authorities. And I think most of Gumshoe readers are CAUTIOUS — and open to both sides presented. But they generally will discount a rant, or person-trashing.
Well said, Editor.
But if I may remind, Part 2 is not about murders. It is about the Murdoch press (in this case, SMH.com.au). “Say No to Cute Side-stepping.”
I used to be a shareholder in Newscorp in Adelaide, before it went Seppo. One year, maybe 1999, the Annual Report consisted of a glossy magazine giving the bio of around 10 of Newscorp’s young executives.
Each of them had boundless energy. I mean seriously boundless energy.
Made me wonder how Rupe had recruited them in the first place. Or did they just feel attracted to mega-media?
But SMH is not newscorp/Murdoch. It is Fairfax.
Correct. It’s a mistake that many make — when the media is essentially controlled by 1 and a half groups.
Mary, i really think you should do some homework on this story, dont you find it strange that the family concerned have made all these claims about their father which they did in around 2006……..and then they ALL remembered it, what had been forgotten since 1966 ??…………oh please, you have no idea really
John, if that were the case — possibly 80% of all the many thousands of victims of child abuse fronting the Royal Commission would have been ‘discounted’. Many took decades to process the abuse — especially if the abuser was around.
In the case of a singular person fronting the commission, I could believe that they could have blocked things out for decades. But for a family of 3 to come up with this at the same time, one of them wasn’t even born then, is ridiculous!!
Mary – just contributing to this one trigger point if I may …
“We can easily trace this “cabal” back to 1913 and it may have been in place well before that. Secrecy is their mainstay.”
I’m sure that was just a key milestone in what started back way before …
I can’t remember exactly which episode focuses on that (Fed Reserve Act of 2013) specifically, but this playlist “NWO: Communism By the Backdoor” (compiled by Dennis Wise) is recommended. I’ll just offer the link here without further comment
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJfoo3hQEPCdTgnaVmpaYRg/playlists
Footnote – this is an abridged version of the above entitled “How the World was Fooled”
On August 4, 2018 Gumshoe published my article “Flypaper Prosecutions” and today Ms Madsen made a belated comment there. So I am transporting part of her comment to here. She said:
“I know that what Fiona is saying is true, I have met and been harassed by people involved in these sadistic army/government abuse programs, and listened to many people’s stories. There are many groups/organisations trying to tackle this age-old problem, the corruption and the coverups, and certainly education is the key to change societies, but also unity.
“There is a great need to organise a conference for all these people to meet collectively so many who has not had their complaints heard.”
I (Mary) ask any readers with ideas on such a conference (however small or informal, or big and formal) to toss them in here. At GumshoeNews.
Don’t be shy. We are severely lacking in mechanics of solidarity tody. I reckon it’s because over the last centuries we moved our neighborly meetings into more “official” institutions and now that the official institutions have got corrupted we are yelling Paradise lost!
How’s about Paradise regained?
How’s about using some of the emotional juice that lurks in us all for helping our neighbors.
Go, juice!
We really do have some deficits in the solidarity department:
.
On a brighter note – this is quite an appropriate moment to share a few profound quotes from a very ‘unlikely’ source:
• “It is not only a matter of doing the right thing; the people must understand that the right thing is the right thing.”
• “The truth is always stronger than the lie.”
• “This is a struggle between light and dark, between truth and falsehood, between true humanity and inhuman barbarism.”
• “The truth cannot be stopped by lies or force. It will get through.”
• “a truth is no less valid because it is expressed daily.”
• “There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and truth will again triumph.”
• “Good propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not lie. It has no reason to fear the truth. It is a mistake to believe that people cannot take the truth. They can. It is only a matter of presenting the truth to people in a way that they will be able to understand. A propaganda that lies proves that it has a bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long run.”
OK, Fish, reveal the author please. He/she seems to have had some profound ideas.
Let me preface my answer with a couple of parodies:
“We need to bomb Syria because they used chemical weapons against their civilians.”
“We need to sanction Russia because they thingied in someone’s elections”
et cetera, et cetera – an avalanche indeed!
Ken O’Keefe perhaps responds best:
Oh, those quotes were by Joseph Goebbels, by the way.
Absolutely disagree with the synopsis of “what a police officer is supposed to be” on all 4 counts.
I’d also have to say that taking gossip on board goes back to Adam and Eve and that blaming the source is just as futile now as it was then.
Berry, I mean that is what we all assume. (those 4 purposes). You and Don (in Gumshoe comments) are the only ones enlightened enough to know that there be a different ‘purpose’ for cops to fulfill.
Feel free to hold forth.
For Don is it always: Support the rich against the poor.
With respect, how can a paragraph in an old diary prove anything.
“A child’s diary that puts a convicted paedophile on Glenelg beach in the days surrounding the Beaumont children’s disappearance there in January 1966 has been handed to Adelaide detectives.”
The words, “In the days surrounding”. That proves nothing, I was at the beach that day, so were my brothers, older than me, my mother and stepfather too.
In the days before and after my brothers and myself were at the beach, my parents were both at work, but came to the beach after work with us.
Has it been proven that Max was off of work those days, the Australia day the kids were taken was NOT a public holiday, people still went to work, hense, the postman seeing the children on his route, my parents had booked the day off but there were thousands of people at the beach on that particular day.
So, I ask again, how does a paragraph in an old diary prove anything?
Deni
I admire your insight !! Brilliant !!! Touché my friend touché !!!!! Hand the tin foil hats out as I’m sure there are many people about to join us for the Grand Finale !! Season 1 episode 3 “ Secrets “ Gee this is better than Reuters !!! “
s’il vous plaît dépêchez-vous l’anticipation me tue ici “
Brandy ready !!! All dressed up with no place to go !!! Waiting ….. waiting …… waiting ….. time is ticking for number 3 !!!!!
Why thank you Bobby, you gots to keep things real on here 🙂
Ivé kind of mentioned you in my comment below, please don’t take it personally, I just need that to get back to Theories in reply to their scathing remarks about myself today..
P.S.
Mary, Dee, i’m sorry if I have disrespected your writings, I never meant to sound that way. I guess i’m just a bit gruff in my writings, I need to hold back sometimes but when you get to my age, you don’t skirt around things, you just come out and say them, much to my detriment now and then LOL..
So keep going, your part 3 might not be what I expected, but it is interesting and well written 🙂
.
And while i’m here, can someone please screen shot what i’m about to write and send it over yonder, I should at least have the right of reply if you’re going to talk about me in such derogative terms..
Carol, in answer to your question, “i’m wondering who Deni actually is”, i’m just me, the
only other name ivé used on the net is my real name, and that is just for family and close
friends in England and Perth, I am not a member of any groups under that name, nor will I ever be.
I don’t pretend to be someone i’m not, nor do I gossip about people as you lot have done
in here today.
I don’t know what screenshots you got given, but I call BS on them.
Sheree, read above, i’m just Deni Tomkinson, I have been her since 1998 when I first got
on this weird world wide web thing. I already explained to you why I use so many exclamation
marks, it’s just a thing I do, a bad habit so to speak, like some people use to many
question marks or full stops, which i’m guilty of too.
I don’t know where I come across as a bully, if I did, I apologise, maybe you took my
straight talking to be bullying, who knows.
As for my dealings with the MACRO task force, give me a break, wouldn’t you pass on any
information about a crime if you thought you knew something?
Surely you would, any decent Australian would, that is my one and only contact with them.
I got a polite email back asking a couple of questions and thanking me, that’s it, end of
story.
You also say that two people have minions in your group who run back with screenshots etc,
just like someone is doing the same with me right now, ironic that :3
P.S. My surname doesn’t have a P in it!!! LOL.
Kim, I have always supported the Mc’s, show me where I haven’t and I will apologise. Ivé
never said one bad word against them the whole time ivé been there, I ask questions about
some of the things they have said, but don’t take that as me not supporting them because I
have their back 100%.
Tara, i’d rather use too many exclamation marks than use all caps, not that i’m saying you
do use caps, i’m just saying.
Omg Rachel, I can promise you this, with hand on heart and I swear on my beloved sons
grave, I am NOT the author of the Flowers site, or the propogator. Bryan himself has met
both Shane and his mother, and neither of them were me. That site is sickening, I only
stayed because I was too nosy to leave, lol. But that got taken out of my hands when I got
kicked out last week, would I kick myself out of my own group? I think not LOL..
I replied quickly to CH because I happened to be there at the time she posted, you may
have noticed there are no replys or messages from me on there since last night, until now, simply
because I don’t sit at my computer all day waiting for people to post.
P.S. to you all, this is the first time ivé ever spoken to CH, just in case you were wondering, I know her by reputation only, if you noticed, she replied to me first, she even asked me who I was, which I explained to her!
I asked you who you were?
If you read above you’ll see who I am, i’m no one, I just have strong opinions and i’m not afraid to use them. I’m just a housewife, a mother of two adult children, one of them deceased!
I have disabilities that prevent me leaving my house very rarely and i’m a carer to my partner who has P.T.S.D.
Oh, and a slave to two cats 🙂
I stuffed up, it happens lol, I thought CH was Legs, my apologies..
I am not ‘legs’. Can’t really see how anyone would think I was. I never write like that on social media. I simply ask questions that need answers and present facts to showcase the things that don’t make sense.
Dear Deni ,
Do not justify yourself to those lost souls who sit on social media trying to be inspector gadget ….
Forget them. I have to listen to their jabberish slander every day .. I cringe when I see a post come up from Captain bovine arse TICK !!! In other words that’s what happens when your up someone’s backside !! Their marriages must be stimulating I would imagine.!! LMAO
I’m sure you’ve seen the posts over there with screen shots from the both of us Bobby, then the childish remarks making fun of me, or us.
I wanted the right of reply, it might get through one or two of their heads that they’re acting like school yard gossips, they are old enough to know better, you don’t treat people like that.
And it’s especially horrible when it’s coming from other woman, arn’t we supposed to stick together, sister power and all that!
Sorry Legs, for some reason I thought you were CH, my apologies, I stuffed up, but everything I said still stands lol
Mary
Writing to VICKI CHAPMAN is very much appreciated.
From the bottom of my heart I sincerely thank you 😊
Regards
BLL
[…] Here Comes the Avalanche, Part 2: Say No to Cute Side-stepping by the Press […]
[…] discussed in Mary Maxwell’s ‘Here Comes the Avalanche Part 2’, my brother Andrew’s victim testimony was instrumental in having now twice-convicted […]