Here Comes the Avalanche, Part 5: Following Mark Minnie’s Death

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

On Monday August 13, 2018, Mark Minnie died at age 58. Let his be the last time The Powers That Be get away with murder. In fact, don’t let them get away with this one. Why should we? We need to stop our habit of accepting such outrages, pronto.

Do we all have Stockholm Syndrome?  Are we a nation of battered wives, both male and female?  Are we clinical cases? It’s inexcusable that we put up with being ruled by criminals. Criminals with titles and credentials — and “nice manners.”  Honestly, we’re idiots.

Come on everybody, it’s time to act; there’s not a minute to lose. He who killeth Mark Minnie – a cop who fought depraved politicians – will be delighted to kill you.

“Ah,” you say “They will only kill us if we ‘stick out’ as Mark Minnie did.” Wrong-o. They have blood lust. They also kill for fun. They score points with one another by showing how they can reverse the rules of civilization — while pretending otherwise.  Haven’t you done any reading to find this out?

Comparisons

It was thrilling to hear that Minnie, and co-author Chris Steyn, had told the world that top-men in the apartheid government, 30 years ago, did almost exactly what top-men in the UK have done.  There is not yet an equivalent book in the UK.  In Australia we don’t need a book; we have “the Royal Commission Report” of 2018 and Fiona Barnett’s website PedophilesDownUnder.com.

We also have GumshoeNews.com, which regularly shows the connections between the following shabby practices:

1. The governance of the world by a hidden cabal
2. The willingness of elected and appointed officials to suck up
3. The possible mind control of most of these “public servants”
4. The apparent secret worship of Satan – oh pleeze– by prime ministers, monarch, judges, and – wait for it – Catholic priests
5. An education program since 1930 to dumb down the population
6. A mass media that “entertains” you and plays on all your weaknesses
7. The collaboration of the mafia and our revered covert agencies
8. The runaway power of the corporation leading to monopolies in every field
9. The bank’s penchant for arranging that wars will happen to support the arms industry and keep the folks busy
10. The out-and-out destruction of the human habitat once referred to affectionately as Mother Earth

Plus — Dee McLachlan, the Editor of GumshoeNews, never misses a chance to show how Parliament is methodically putting nails in our coffin by passing laws that criminalize the REPORTING OF CRIME.

How dare they! How bloody dare they! Oh, wait a minute. How dare we let this happen? Have we no regard for our agreed-upon morals? Are we all hoping that things will work out and we will continue to have life on Easy Street?

Ain’t gonna happen.  First, we gave away our “authority” — you realize we are the authority, the majority – to persons of weird character, and second, we forbade ourselves to chase after them with a broomstick or what ever might be handy.

Can’t really beat that for a “winning formula,” can you?

A New Dawn Sort of Thing

Walk with me through some changes that must appear on the docket in the immediate future. There can be no reliance on mass media or on government. Indeed they are the enemy.  We need to treat them as the enemy.

Does that mean “take up cudgels”?  No, forget the cudgels for now. Not because violence has to be ruled out — violence is a standard human way to deal with power. Usually it goes t’other way – the biggies are violent toward the smallies.

Today we feel small and should stop feeling small.  It is more accurate for us to envision ourselves as the biggies.

Two and a half thousand years ago, Plato said this:  If you take a king and his handful of henchmen and his many “subjects” off to a desert island, where their usual trappings of status are missing, the king and henchmen would soon get a queasy feeling in their proverbial stomachs.

Yes, Plato of all people came up with that very good observation. Perhaps he didn’t use the word “queasy” but that is what he meant. And on that island the ordinary people would start to feel non-queasy. They would see the reality of the situation – the “king” has no real power (other than the power they have been foolishly ascribing to him).

Our Constitutional Monarch

Why is Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain the queen of Australia?  For one reason only: because the Australian Constitution of 1900 says so. It is a ridiculous situation. We are not British. (To some extent we were, up until 1949.) How can we have a foreigner as our head of state?

Gumshoe recently published the article “With All Due Respect, the Queen Must Go.”  It didn’t have anything negative to say about Her Majesty. The point was only about law.  But now, after the South African Bird Island sizzler, it is time to say: HRH Charles, the Prince of Wales cannot be welcomed as king of Australia.

HRH fraternized with Jimmy Savile who was very much in the business of child trafficking. Most likely Prince Charles knew of it.  Even if, amazingly, he did not know what Savile was getting up to, he has heard about it lately and has not distanced himself.

I think Charles is caught in a bind the same way all of the high-level pedophiles are caught. They have lived a delusional existence, acting contrary to all our values (let’s face it, killing babies to drink their blood is not exactly within the tramlines, is it?).

The Significance of Bird Island

The Defence Minister of South Africa had Bird Island on which to carry out his cavorting.  US President Gerald Ford had Mackinaw Island.  Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau also had Mackinaw Island. Yep, they shared it – it’s located near Lake Michigan where the two nations are contiguous.

UK Prime Minister Edward Heath may not have had an island, but he is known to have had a boat. Once he finished with a boy he could dump him overboard. I only know about these English-speaking countries. (The Dutch got outed, to the extent of victims accusing the queen of the Netherlands of supporting a pedophile ring.)

The point here is not to say that “They all do similar things.”  The point is that if they are so similar they must be connected. This is really good news.  It is proof that a cabal operates across borders. I think they run every country.

(North Korea and Iran are presented to us by the media as mavericks, but don’t you believe it.  The cabal is in full charge. A “maverick” like Kim Jong-un or Ahmadinejad play the part needed in the great stage play of politics.)

The significance of what Mark Minnie and Chris Steyn did, in uncovering both the pedophilia of Bird Island and the way in which government avoided punishment, is that no one can now fail to register what is going on.  This is great news!

Punishing Daddy

No one like to punish his own father, much less — God forbid — his mother. The same can be said of a monarch or president or (until recently anyway) a Pope. It just goes against the grain.

To criticize the leader causes you to feel disloyal.  This is a deep instinct. It was adaptive at an early stage of human evolution. Two human groups often fought, and the winning group was likely to have been the one that could close ranks.  It could depend on automatic discipline by the male warriors.

That’s all well and good for the circumstance but that is not our circumstance.  When you have government leaders disobeying the most basic social rules – and hurting people like mad – what advantage would there be in us closing ranks with them.  Stupid, right?

Thanks to the pedophile scandal, we see that many of our leaders do indeed violate all norms of decency.  But wait; it’s not limited to pedophilia, or the taking of money from the treasury. Or other standard political “scandals.”  Today the legislators – at least 90 percent of them in the US — pass laws that are truly harmful, and are intended to be so!

The time to punish Daddy has arrived.

And by the way, not only is Prince Charles unthinkable as king of Australia, so Peter Dutton is unthinkable as prime minister of Australia. According to Fiona Barnett, we have already had three prime ministers (that’s in living memory, maybe many before that?)  who did not do the right thing.  It is already evident that Dutton is not doing the right thing. In fact, he appears mind-controlled and yet has accumulated many portfolios.

Restoring Law

Betcha when word goes around that there really is a cataclysmic change needed, intellectuals will think “We’ve got to invent new social arrangements.”  No, we don’t.  If we were using law in the normal way, plus punishing Daddy – which is very much provided for on the books – we would be OK. The awful scandals would not have occurred. The practice of Satanism would have been laughed off the stage.

Now follow this logic:  if it was lack of enforcement of law that allowed all this to happen (granted, it was aided by secrecy), then law enforcement is the solution. Simple as pie.

The Physical Awkwardness of Capturing “Daddy”

Houston, we have a problem. The persons who normally prosecute crime, i.e., the state and federal prosecutors, have been captured.  Or were appointed to act against law in the first place.

Even if they did issue the necessary indictments, protected persons could still be protected by police’s failure to arrest them. And if they somehow made it to court, bad judges could (and often do) “let them off.”

Therefore, it is not enough to simply state the law again – although that in itself is very influential and should be done in firm tones. We do have a problem of punishing Daddy.

It may come down to vigilantes.  Or posse’s. Or individual citizens. None of that is ideal but if nothing else is possible, this must happen.  The law maxim that covers this is: Necessitas non habet legem. Necessity has no law.

Every Human Can Defend Himself – It’s the Law

If someone is about to attack you – or other persons close by – you may attack the attacker. There is currently a valid precedent for this (though there does not need to be; it is part of common law): Australia’s High Court ruled in 1987 in the case of Zecevic v DPP:

“The question to be asked in the end is simple. It is whether the accused believed upon reasonable grounds that it was necessary in self-defence to do what he did. If he had that belief and there were reasonable grounds for it, or if the jury is left in reasonable doubt about the matter, then he is entitled to an acquittal.”

The word “acquittal” means you would probably have been arrested when you performed the deed, but trust in the law: you are entitled to go free.

Conclusion

Truth will out.  Truth did out in regard to Bird Island in South Africa. The murder of the writer Mark Minnie, an ex-cop, has twofold meaning for us. First, it shows that the Powers That Be do indeed think it’s just dandy for them to kill anyone who gets in their way or who holds them accountable to society’s standards. “Bang, you’re dead. Goodbye Ol’ Chap.”

Second the incident proves to us that “they” really do control the good offices of law.  They hide evidence, steal evidence, refuse to answer simple questions, intimidate the public, thrust on the public a mass of lies as to what’s going on. They are the enemy of all of us.

We need to declare war on them and not feel awkward about that.  Once they get the picture, they can come forward and try to negotiate.

To repeat: they are our enemy. THEY ARE OUT TO HARM US.

Confucius say: “The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their right name.”

— Mary W Maxwell is the author of Prosecution for Treason.  She means business.