by Dee McLachlan
“The sexual abuse of a child is a terrible crime. It is the greatest of personal violations… Tens of thousands of children have been sexually abused in many Australian institutions. We will never know the true number… The sexual abuse of children has occurred in almost every type of institution where children reside or attend…”
The above is from the Executive Summary in the final report of Australia’s Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. It is logical to assume this type of abuse happens in the entertainment industry too, and especially in Hollywood.
The Two Coreys
I lived and worked in Los Angeles in the 90s, and directed a film starring Corey Haim (1971 – 2010). From the moment we started shooting, I realized this young man was a very troubled and damaged, drug-taking teenager. He was also a very close friend to Corey Feldman (Gremlins, Goonies). So when I heard Corey Feldman’s accusations about a Hollywood pedophile ring a few years ago, I believed him.
To quote the New York Post:
“For years, Feldman has been adamant that he and childhood friend Corey Haim were victims of molestation in Hollywood, and that predators remain… his accounts have never wavered.”
It was only in October 2016, that Hollywood actress Rose McGowan posted a series of tweets accusing a “studio head” of rape. A year later, the Harvey Weinstein story finally broke, with others joining the #MeToo revolution against him. Others fell too. Has this paved the way for the next level of abuse to be exposed — pedophilia.
A Stage Disaster
I recently read an article by ‘Ent Lawyer’ (Someone I believe is claiming to be an entertainment lawyer, but writing anonymously). On 9 November 2017 he wrote an account about a young actress attracting executives for a sordid lunchtime performance. After the performance, something happened — and it is possible that this ultimately claimed a young actress’s life. No one is named, but the account is chillingly real.
Ent lawyer says this took place in the mid 80s — a time he says was a “peak” period for child molesting in Hollywood. It was a time when there was no internet and very few mobile phones, and producers loved casting shows with kids and tweens. He say this TV show “was the worst place on earth if you were a kid.” He describes how one day a special new guest star was to appear in the television series. I quote from his article:
“Executives would drive over to Hollywood right before lunch and would stay at the studio for several hours each day. Anyway, on this particular show, there was a special guest star. Executives flocked to the studio that day to see her… One of the [other] stars of the show… described the atmosphere that day:
“I had just turned 12 or 13. I was the same age as the actress coming in. Maybe a little older. We had been shooting for months and I was old news. They knew I would do what they wanted, but they always wanted someone new. This was someone new and someone they all knew. They had it set up like a peep show almost. She had finished shooting that morning and they brought her out on a stage… and the front four rows of this theatre were filled with guys who were already rubbing themselves. The girl was wearing a bikini… The lights were focused on her and she couldn’t really see out to the audience. She was squinting. They had her walk back and forth. Then they had her start dancing… This went on for about 20 minutes. Then three of the guys took her to a different area of the studio.”
Ent Lawyer continues:
“The actress didn’t see what happened, but about 45 minutes later, one of those three guys came running out and needed a set medic. Apparently they had inserted something inside the girl and things were bad. The medic came and the ambulance came. The parents of the girl were told some crap story. That crap story ended up killing the girl because the parents believed the executives. Two weeks later, the show finished shooting six episodes all at once and then everyone was sent on their way forever.”
Ent Lawyer does not name the young actress nor the TV show, but commenters at the bottom of the article suggest Heather O’Rouke. She was in the eighth last episode of 71 episodes of the TV series Rocky Rock. I cautiously agree it fits the account. However, Heather was then diagnosed with a parasite called Giardia. Some time later, inflammation in her gut was said to be Crohns disease. This article in the Los Angeles Times on 3 February 1988 is noteworthy:
“Heather O’Rourke [star of the “Poltergeist” films]… has died on an operating table at a San Diego hospital… A spokeswoman for Children’s Hospital of San Diego identified the cause of death as intestinal stenosis — a severe bowel obstruction that the girl evidently had from birth. The obstruction caused an infection that, in turn, brought on septic shock. The shock prompted full cardiac and pulmonary arrest…”
Her mother won an out of court settlement for a misdiagnosis.
It is now 30 years later, and many names are surfacing.
The Australian Comparison
We are familiar with some of Fiona Barnett’s accounts and accusations (in Australia). Below is an extract from her Witness Statement to the International Tribunal for Natural Justice, published here on 25 July 2018:
“My name is Fiona Barnett… I am a victim of CIA child trafficking, Luciferian ritual abuse, and Project MK-ULTRA.
“Child trafficking is run as a single integrated world operation. This operation is coordinated by the CIA in collaboration with British and Australian intelligence services. Retired NYPD Detective James Rothstein was appointed to the first US taskforce to investigate this child trafficking operation which, he found, went all the way up to the Whitehouse. Detective Rothstein found that the CIA were behind a blackmail operation in which child prostitutes were used to honeytrap and compromise politicians, military brass, top businessmen, and key government officials. Rothstein, who arrested the key Watergate perpetrator, said Watergate solely concerned this human compromise racket, and specifically was an attempt to obtain a list of compromised pedophile VIPs and their proclivities that was held at the Democratic National Headquarters. I spoke with Rothstein who said he knew of an identical VIP pedophile ring that existed here in Australia…
“They have control over the police, media, universities, defence forces, parliament, schools, health services, churches of all denominations, psychiatric hospitals, and fake child abuse advocacy organisations like Bravehearts. You can not possibly understand their pervasiveness unless you were raised in their world.”
Her full statement, which can be read here. is strikingly SIMILAR to another woman’s journey — Sarah Ruth Ashcraft.
Sarah Ruth Ashcraft
On December 4, 2017, Ashcraft made the claim that she was sexually abused as a young teen by Tom Hanks.
Interestingly, her initials SRA, also stands for Satanic Ritual Abuse. I’d like to see an interview with Sarah, but at this stage she is not doing interviews, and is drip feeding her Twitter account. Since reading one her her Tweets about 10 days ago, she has increased her Twitter followers from 30,000 to around 45,500.
Sarah says that her father sold her (services) when she was a young teenager, and in one thread she names many of her family members.
“Hey Uncle Danny, do you still have that robe you wore in the basement of our Royal Oak house the day y’all made that snuff film? This one, right here in this picture. It looked like a choir robe. Do you still have it? I think the good guys are going to want to keep is as evidence.”
On 17 December 2017, Dr. Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal had posted this:
“Approximately a month ago, Sarah Ruth Ashcraft directly accused Hillary Clinton of participating in a ‘ritual abuse event,’ via Tweet… Ashcraft has a Twitter and a Facebook account and describes herself on both as: ‘Survivor of Ritual Abuse, Mind Control, Child Porn, and Sex Trafficking. Philosopher by education. Truth warrior.’
“Why do I believe her? Because there is great danger, not glamour, in taking on a worldwide network of child sex traffickers in high places… She further claims that ‘pizzagate,’ meaning a tightly connected, powerful network of pedophiles, is real.”
I researched Dr “Dossy” Blumenthal — she she is presently Communications Director, National Network for Manufacturing Innovation, reporting to the White House and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (Interesting for those of us who criticize the NIST report of 9-11). So Sarah has supporters in high places and Dr Blumenthal must be acutely aware that Trump is going after pedophiles.
In a tweet Sarah writes:
“This is the truth as I experienced it. You do not have to believe me. I offer it for your consideration. Please do your own research and make up your own mind. Beware of anything trying to tell you what to think. Logic & Critical Thinking are your friends. Let’s grow out of this.”
She believes these people would like to normalize pedophilia, and that every royal family, every alternative religion, every deep state, and every culture has been infiltrated by these people (#Hivite families). They “hide in everything and subvert all to get total control.”
Are we to believe tens of thousands of Australian institutional victims of child abuse, but not people like Sarah Ruth Ashcraft? Most of what Sarah and Fiona describe is so evil, it is hard to take in. This is how Sarah Ruth Ashcraft sees the information unfolding.
Why is Hollywood So Important?
Sarah and others are now pointing to several VERY high profile Hollywood directors and actors. These people have made their studios tens of billions, and been part of many people’s lives for decades. How long will it take for Hollywood to be turned upside down by these and other revelations?
There is already a belief that that the political class is morally bankrupt, but movie stars and celebrities have been put on golden pedestals. These are people are adored. And it is for this reason that if and when these accusations and others are proven true, their tumbling will be an awakening for people globally.
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/07/31/major-spielberg-development-hollyweird-greatawakening-pizzagate-pedogate-nomore/
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/07/27/isaac-kappy-blows-the-whistle-on-the-partymonsters-hollyweird-greatawakening-pizzagate-pedogate-nomore/
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/07/22/hollywoodrenegades-how-hollywood-insiders-are-taking-down-thecabal-from-the-inside-out-hollyweird-greatawakening/
Kudos to QAnon and the guys at 4/8chan for having the guts to declare war on paedowood.
From around 45 minutes in. Oh boy. Kappy claims of secret rooms in Seth Green’s house.
I worked with Nicole Eggert in the 90s
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vu7RDoDxATQ
David Ike, formerly one of the truly great geopolitical researchers, identified the Clintons as participants in paedophilia and child snuff activities, and had his mind scrambled in reprisal, an event marked by his sudden insistence that the global elite are shape-shifting reptilian ETs.
Nothing will change until people power is restored and the global media is reduced to confetti.
Tony, have you got specific links?
Fiona Barnett’s MeToo moment
https://pedophilesdownunder.com/2018/08/01/bond-university-lecturer-katarina-fritzon-raped-student-fiona-barnett/
https://www.thewashingtonpundit.com/blank-1/IsaacKappyExposes
Some are warning: Proceed with deep skepticism.
A comment on Kappy: We have to wary that…
“Another useful ploy is the false accusation. First, create a situation where you are wrongly accused. Then, at a convenient moment, arrange for the false accusation to be shown to be false beyond all doubt. Those who have made accusations against both the company and its management become discredited.”
If you don’t have the objective evidence, then you have to be very careful. As far as ‘witnesses’, I used to be a barrister that has taken more than a few juicy stories apart. I’ve kept a couple of blokes out of gaol that would have spent time on false rape charges. In one case the bloke was over in Austria at the time of the alleged offense. Another one the girl was late for an appointment, so she made up a story of being raped to account for being late.
Even when you have witnesses to add corroboration you have to be wary. Just think of the Port Arthur Massacre and all the witness statements that swear they saw Martin Bryant and positively identified him using the police photographs.
Then we have the ‘misinformation’ campaigns to discredit the story that Dee mentioned. Learn to be skeptical and analytical, distance yourself from the emotion that is being generated and use your logic.
Hence my reluctance to mention the many names mentioned.
He stated he tipped off the NSA through Qanon board red flag right there , and after a short pause he remembered an anonymous tip to “I think” DHS . I call straight up bull shit ….
Terry raises basic rules that found a direction to a jury by a court in all criminal cases.
No experienced lawyer has not had to deal with such circumstances in a profesional lifetime.
To just spend a minute with some more detail…. paraphrasing a direction (from recollections) to a jury in all cases and in summary.
“…. members of the jury you have taken an oath or affirmed that you will determine this case on the evidence presented to you by the Crown and for the case for the defence.
You are present as representatives of the community to determine whether the accused is/are guilty of the charges brought by the Crown in the indictment presented to you during this trial.
As members of the community, you as a whole bring to this court your common sense. That is not an arduous task, you do it every day in normal life experiences.
So do not feel overwhelmed when considering your duty during this trial.
When considering your findings on alleged relevant facts just weigh up the evidence/testimonies presented from those called to the witness box and/ or the exhibits tendered by either the Crown or the defence.
When considering the evidence you must put aside any preconceived material relating to this matter, put aside all prejudices relating to status, race, religion, beliefs and all matters of a similar nature.
Just consider the evidence presented in this court relevant to the elements constituting those elements making the offence/s charged.
To do other than as I have directed does not serve justice in this case.
Now I will direct you on the law as pertaining to the essential elements to constitute the indictment presented by the Crown……… you must determine your finding of facts beyond reasonable doubt…..”
Terry, been awhile since I have heard the usual directions! You are invited to comment and/ or research the latest judicial crib sheet on such directions.
For all the bigots, racists, those who have preconceived notions and believe alleged crap experts from uninformed traitors and fakes: one day you may have to actually consider the crap put up by media and politicians and do your duty……. stop being a gullible ignoranamus and do yor duty to your fellow human beings….. expose the lying bastard politicians, bureacrats and journalists of the mass media.
One day you may wake up and realise that government has lied to you, gone to go invade and kil,l all based on bullshit and justified due to public sloth, gullibility and ignorance.
Now, is anyone able to name a mass media organisation, a journalist, a bureacrat or politician who has the intellectual capacity, integrity and honesty who may relied upon and be able to carry out their duty in a simple criminal trial expected of every decent human being in our society called to do their duty?
As for media and politicians, I cannot think of one.
For future persons called for jury service, try practising your abilities by examining the official 911 government unscientific conspiracy theory and how and why we have been at war for 18 years in the Middle East.
Correction! Not 18 years!
Why we have been at war in the Middle East at least since the mid 1890s.
Look up Evan Black: ” banking on Baghdad” and the invention of Israel by the zionists.
Ned, I’m retired and it has been more than 12 years since I ran a jury trial. I wonder if the ‘crib sheet’ has changed much in the last 100 years.
As far as your comments about ‘crap experts’, Gawd damn I’ve cross-examined hundreds of them. You wonder where some of these litigants find them, there are only so many rocks to look under. Doctors, psychiatrists, police ballistics, on and on.
I had an arson trial coming up so I read a manual on arson investigation. I went out to the burnt out house to take a ‘view’. – WTF? The ‘expert’ for the insurance company said the was intentionally started in the attic. It looked to me the fire started in the corner of the living room. I pulled myself up into the attic and sure enough the slats were intact on top and any fire damage was from below and through the cracks in the boards. I took a bunch of pictures and hammered the crap out of that hack for the insurance company.
Experts for hire, you pay, we lie.
I agree, Ned, but for the 21st century there needs to be additional jury instructions.
Dear Jurors,
You may have heard that evidence is perfect if it comes from an official contemporaneous record. Thus, if someone claims an injury 30 years ago and can show the hospital record of it, you must give it full credence. Not so fast! As Dee listed in the above case of a girl injured during satanic assault, the hospital may have cheated by calling the injury something else. (The bite of blue octopus, for example).
Or you may think that all court decisions are correct reflections of what was presented in court. Not so fast! The clerk, or the judge, or Amahl the Night Visitor, may have made post hoc use of the old eraser. The late Sherman Skolnick — who put many Chicago judges behind bars — said the practice is rife. (I think he called it “perjuring their own records” but I don’t quite get that usage.)
Now consider physical evidence as tendered by police or Feebs. You have to factor in a boulder of salt here. The placing of evidence at the scene by parties interested in getting a patsy convicted is logical and predictable, is it not? And if the defense — I mean in cases where there is an actual defense — wants to challenge the findings — e.g., was there poison in the lipstick? — they can hardly find an independent lab that does Feeb-type work. J Edgar Hoover cornered the market on labs, so to speak.
So run off to the deliberating room now, armed with your brain and your Bill of Rights, and raise holy hell. Don’t come back till you have made a really balanced judgment. The guy you are sending to prison may have 60 years ahead of him in which to feel daily, nay hourly, resentment and frustration. It could be you. Act accordingly.
“said the practice is rife. (I think he called it “perjuring their own records” but I don’t quite get that usage.)”
The judges change the transcripts of the proceedings – I’ve seen it plenty of times. One time it worked quite well for me. I got in a sh!t fight with the QC for the bank in court. I called him out for his dirty tricks in front of a full bench of the Federal Court. He glared at me and I I knew he was going to take revenge.
Sure enough, I got a complaint to the Bar Association. Here’s where it got funny. The three judges on the Bench liked me. When I read the transcripts I noticed that the exchange had been completely altered to where I was looking good.
I expect when the QC noticed that I had three senior judges going to bat for me, he realized he was the one in trouble. He respectfully “withdrew his complaint without reservations”.
Thank you, Barrister Shulze. The pleasant change of record made me think of Dee Ferdinand’s story about her father:
“She described how she called [Ted] Shackley several years ago, demanding that her father’s grave marker be changed, showing him as colonel instead of staff sergeant. (Sergeant was Carone’s permanent military status and colonel was his temporary commission status.) Within two weeks, the marker was replaced, showing his rank as Colonel.”
I tried to find Ferdinand’s testimony on the net and it seems to have disappeared. However it is in a book by Rodney Stich. I will send it to Dee to post on Gumshoe.
Rodney, now in his nineties, is a great investigator and has worked tirelessly to get the word to us all. He spoke on hundreds of radio shows when it was still possible to do that.
Meanwhile I seem to be “on punishment” by various telecoms in US such that it is quite the struggle even to send an email, and it takes more than 30 minutes for me to access Gumshoe.
As I wrote before, “A “bomb” was dropped onto Australia on Thursday the 5th of July.” Fiona continues to expose the system. https://gumshoenews.com/2018/07/06/who-will-investigate-fiona-barnetts-claims/
[…] right, maybe nothing happened then, but as of Fiona’s latest naming of names it would now be impossible for the crimes to continue as […]