How To Understand the JFK Assassination – and Reverse It!

John Magufuli (1959-2021), president of Tanzania who stood up against the Covid lockdowns (BBC: “He also mocked the efficacy of masks, and expressed doubts about testing.”) Died in office, shortly after that. Photo: The Atlantic.

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

For us oldies, the Kennedy presidency was a wondrous time, so full of hope and creativity.  And not just in America.  As Monika Weisak points out in her book, “America’s Last President,” people around the world saw JFK as a force against the rule of the callous. In small villages in Africa, folks had his photo on a wall in their home. They were correctly devastated by his death.

Can we get the happy moment back?  I say Yes.  I say Defo (Australianese for definitely). We can definitely have it all again.  This entails recognizing who did the assassination and why.

During the current hearings of the Task Force on Declassification of the JFK Files, I have seen Rep Luna, a young congresswoman from Florida, listening courteously to some of the famous JFK researchers. It gave me a fantasy of probing more deeply. So I conjured up another congresswoman – “Rep Moona” – who would invite eight ‘dissident’ authors to speak, viz.,

Barr McClellan, Fred Newcomb, Richard Belzer, Laurent Guyenot, Greg Poulgrain, John Coleman, JF Kennedy, and Mary Maxwell. 

I will now present their testimony, in three parts. Granted, these eight persons did not actually go to Washington. But I have put words into their mouth – words from their own books, slightly paraphrased. You are asked (begged) to read the whole thing, 7600 words. I consider it to be, as a whole, the true picture of humanity’s fall after 1963.

PART ONE — McClellan, Newcomb, and Belzer

Rep Moona:  Hello, Mr Barr Oliver McClellan, I have read your book “Blood, Money, & Power” (2011). You were “3 down from the top” in Texas politics in your later career, though only a law student on November 22, 1963. Is that correct?

Mr Barr McClellan: Yes, at a major law firm I answered to Don Thomas, who answered to Ed Clark, who was LBJ’s lawyer. (From p 23): I found myself partner with the man who had killed Kennedy. Namely, Johnson. My admiration for Kennedy and his ideas was buried under the ethical prohibitions of the attorney-client privilege.  Granted, there was also a visceral pleasure: I was part of an organization more powerful than the law itself. We simply subverted justice.

Rep Moona: What do you say about the assassination today?

Mr Barr McClellan: (p24)  I say Justice has yet to be done.

Moona: Please give us more about what happened.

McClellan: There was social pressure on Ed Clark. He had to keep the oilmen happy, as Kennedy had had the colossal gall to lower their favorite tax deduction, the oil depletion allowance, to 15%.  So they wanted Kennedy out before he reduced 15% to zero. There was behind-the-scenes pressure on LBJ, stemming from a murder committed by Mac Wallace at Johnson’s behest. That case could break open at any time; Lyndon was scared. Finally, my trusted friend Don Thomas told me that LBJ, near the end of his life, confessed to his psychiatrist that he was the guilty party.

Moona: You don’t mean he wielded the gun?

McClellan: No, he actually got Mac Wallace and an un-named man to do it. I have the professional forensic evidence of Mac Wallace’s fingerprint on a box in the 6^th floor of the Texas School Book Depository.

***

Rep Moona: Good morning, Tyler Newcomb. I see that you are here to speak up for your deceased father, Fred Newcomb, and his co-researcher Perry Adams.

Mr Tyler Newcomb: Yes. Dad started to do the research in 1966 after he read Edward Epstein’s book, “Inquest.” He gave it his all until 1974.  But instead of publishing it, he shared it only with members of government. Finally, in 2011 before he died, I and Perry’s widow Valerie, got it published and he was pleased. It is called “Murder from Within.”

Moona: What does that book’s title mean?

Newcomb: Two things. First that it was an inside job, that the government — especially the Secret Service – did it . Second that we needn’t look for shooters on the Grassy Knoll or in a drain, as the shots came from “within” the car. The limo driver, William Greer, did it, perhaps with a new-tech gun. He held his right hand on the steering wheel, but turned and used his left hand to shoot, as he swiveled around. Gov Connolly was in his way, so he shot Connolly in the chest. Both Jackie and the president saw Greer shoot. 

Moona: Why do we not see this on the Zapruder film?

Newcomb: It was on that famous film. But that film spent the weekend Nov 24-25 in a special lab where Secret Services doctored it. Dad was an expert in photography and graphics. This is how he was able to figure out how many frames of the film were missing. Dad also had access to the photos taken by Altgens.

Moona: I am familiar with eye witnesses and ear witnesses, but Newcomb and Perry came up with “nose witnesses.”  Please explain.

Newcomb: Many people reported, on the day of the shooting, that they got a strong smell of gunshot. Those people were behind the president’s car. This supports the idea of the bullets moving from the front to the back of the car. Dad also thought that a person in one of the follow-up cars fired a shot as a decoy, near the Depository building. Some people in that area smelled gunsmoke.  But there was no smell up on the 6^th floor.

Moona: I see that the book Murder from Within is astonishingly detailed in its documentation, such as explaining whenever the Newcomb-Perry work differs from the Warren Commission report.

Newcomb: Yes, Dad spent a fortune to buy all 26 volumes of the Warren Report.  On page 80 he notes drily that the Warren Commission deleted Mrs Kennedy’s reference to wounds. Quote:

“The General Counsel for the Commission, in a letter of December 10, 1964, explained the removal [of Mrs Kennedy’s words] “as a matter of good taste and because it could contribute nothing to the Inquiry.” [That is also in John D Weaver’s book “Warren: The Man, the Court, the Era.”]

Moona: I see that your father also went to some trouble to find out what happened at Bethesda Hospital where the autopsy was done.

Newcomb: Chapter 5 is all about Parkland Hospital and Chapter 6 covers what happened at Bethesda.  I can summarize. Assuming the plotters had well-rehearsed the entire plan, the president was to have been shot dead and Gov Connolly was not to have been wounded. The limousine was to speed on to Love Field, never stopping at a Texas Hospital. But Connolly needed treatment. Also we now know that Kennedy did not die until 1pm in Parkland. He still had a pulse on arrival.

Kennedy’s time in Parkland is all anyone needs to know as to government chicanery. The doctors there all concluded that the bullet entered from the front and blew out much of his brain. Yet no word from any Parkland doctor got included in the Warren Commission Report.  The false story of a bullet from the back was to be maintained at any price.

Dr Rose, Texas’s medical examiner, forbade the Secret Service to take the body out of Texas as it was a homicide. Quoting page 130 of “Murder from Within,”

“In 1963, the murder of a president was not covered by federal law. If a federal agent, however, was killed, the federal authorities could intervene. Such an agent was fictitiously slain … At 1:23 p.m., Walter Cronkite announced on CBS, ‘A Secret Service man was also killed in the fusillade of shots.’  At 3:33 p.m., a denial was issued in Washington DC. By that time the ploy had served its purpose.”

Moona: And Bethesda Naval Hospital?

I’ll make the long story short:  Since the set-up of the scapegoat was already taken care of, it had to be pronounced from autopsy doctors that Kennedy had been shot from the back, by a bullet from the Book Depository. The doctors massively interfered with his body to hide the real wounds and create false ones.

***

Rep Moona: Greetings, Mr Richard Belzer. I am aware that you and David Wayne compiled a list of suspicious deaths of people who “knew too much” about Kennedy’s murder.

Mr Richard Belzer: Yes, it is called “Hit List” (2013). It became a best seller. So that may be how many citizens became aware of the suspicious deaths of, say, Dorothy Kilgallen, George de Mohrenschildt, and Johnny Roselli.

Moona: Is it fair to say that your book proves that each of the 50 victims had some connection to the JFK assassination?

Belzer: No, no. We named 50 people who are possible victims, but then we identified those for whom death-by-natural-causes can reasonably be argued. Even where the person was plainly murdered, such as one of Jack Ruby’s strippers at the Carousel Club, we deduced natural causes. (Her husband actually did it, for domestic reasons.)

There were some deaths that occurred just before the person was scheduled to give testimony to Congress — or to the court in New Orleans where Jim Garrison was conducting a trial. If so, David and I almost automatically deemed it “NOT a coincidence.”  Similarly, if police declared the death a suicide, but friends who knew him had recently seen him in fine spirits, we used our deeming prerogative. It’s a very commonsense book.

Moona: Please run through a case for us. For example, you mentioned Johnny Roselli.

Belzer: OK. Roselli was big in the Chicago mob and had Al Capone as a tutor. He was sent to Hollywood to extort from the movie business, and sent to Vegas to shake down the casino profits. Roselli was also involved with Howard Hughes. His murder, when it occurred, consisted of having his legs sawed off and stuffed, with his body, into a 55-gallon drum, and sunk off the Florida coast.

The date was August 1976, when he was scheduled to testify before Congress. So who did the murder? A reasonable guess is the Mafia, judging by the 55-gallon drum. But it could have been the US government.

Moona: Is there a Cuban connection here?

Belzer: Almost certainly. But I should first say that mercenaries are mercenaries.  It may be possible to hire a hitman for a job with no regard to his ethnicity or political leanings. That said, there were plenty of Cuban men, in Cuba, who did not want Fidel Castro to continue on as leader. They would have liked to see the US declare war on Cuba, to get rid of “the Communist threat” to America – or at least people talked like that.

Failing that, they wanted Castro assassinated.  It is documented that the US made many covert attempts to take Fidel out. It seems that the US Military was happy with the prospect of killing Castro, but the US president, John F Kennedy, did not agree. At one point, in 1961, various men gathered many upstarts on Cuba’s island and hoped to direct a private uprising of Cubans. JFK put the kibosh on it.

Moona: You say the US military was in on it, but the Commander-in-Chief was not.

Belzer: Yes. This is known as the Bay of Pigs fiasco. Kennedy accepted responsibility for the fiasco. As for Johnny Roselli, I assume he was mafia but at times it is hard to distinguish a mafia person from a US government employee, be it CIA, the NSA, or the US Military.

Moona: What is your personal guess as to who “drummed” Roselli?

Belzer: Since he was due to give testimony, both the mafia and the CIA had a lot to worry about. So I can’t decide. But here is a quote on page 113 of our book, “Hit List.” It’s from a 2001 article that Paul Golais wrote at The Citizen’s Voice in the UK.  Gary Underhill had told a woman friend:

“This country is too dangerous for me. I’ve got to get on a boat. Oswald is a patsy. They set him up. It’s too much. The bastards have done something outrageous.  They killed the president! They’re a bunch of drug runners and gun runners – a real violence group. I know who they are. That’s the problem. They know I know.”

Of course Gary got murdered.  I also found something interesting in a book called “Gary Underhill Biography,” written by John Simkin, a historian. He muses that the mafia may have deliberately got involved with the CIA so as to, how shall I say, avoid legal punishment.  Wow.

This could even be stretched so far as to say that the mafia arranged the death of JFK so that it would be very public and ensure that the CIA’s (or military’s) involvement would always require denial. You could say it thus boosted the cultural acceptability of government lying.

***

PART TWO – Guyénot, Poulgrain, Coleman

Rep Moona: I invited you to this hearing, Mr Guyénot, because of your 2021 book “The Unspoken Kennedy Truth.” It mainly blames Israel for the assassination not only of JFK in 1963, but also RFK in 1968. 

Mr Laurent Guyénot: There are hundreds of books on the JFK assassination.  Setting aside those that were published for distraction or misinformation, there are many whose author noticed something amiss and went from there. For example, they may have recognized a woman in the crowd at Dealey Plaza to be carrying a tiny revolver. Or, if they work in a government office, they may have seen an old letter from a diplomat that suspiciously tied together two persons who testified at the Warren Commission.

That is not my style. I am an anthropologist, born in Europe. I developed a theory, or at least a hypothesis, as to who made the decision to get rid of President Kennedy – Israel.  Then I went looking for facts that would support it and found even more that I needed.  Here it my pitch, in brief:

The state of Israel, especially its prime minister Ben Gurion, wanted Israel to become powerful. (In 1963 it was only 16 years in existence, and was weak.) But JFK was on a peace kick and he said he would block Israel’s plans to go nuke. He worried that the Dimona plant would not be, as promised, a nuclear power plant for energy but would put Israel into the club of N-states: US, UK, France, and USSR.

I hypothesize that Israel made use of James Angleton in the CIA to sketch out a way to kill Kennedy. An important person in Dallas was nightclub owner Jack Ruby, formerly Jacob Rubenstein. The most crucial person on Israel’s side was Lyndon Johnson.

Rep Moona: I now ask you to spend a few minutes each on Angleton, Ruby, and LBJ, to show how they played a role.

Mr Laurent Guyénot:  James Angleton (1917-1987) was age 30 when he joined the brand-new CIA in 1947.  He had also been involved in Gladio in Italy. That organization was trying to find communists in Europe (and root them out) after World War II.  Angleton ran his shop in the CIA in an extremely secretive manner. Allen Dulles, the first CIA Director, had named Jim Angleton as Chief of Counterintelligence. That (Co-Intel) is meant to track foreigners in one’s own country who may be spies. Indeed, Angleton went on a search for Soviet moles in the CIA itself.

That said, I would not rule out that he actually worked directly for Israelis. Jefferson Morley has done intense research on this in his book “The Ghost” (2017). Starting in 1951, Angleton ran the Israeli desk within the CIA. Ben Gurion had come over to America to help establish a connection between Mossad so they would exchange secret information. Angleton visited with the diplomatic staff from Tel Aviv almost every day.

Israel considered Gamal Nasser, leader of Egypt, its enemy. Yet Angleton failed to warn his own US government (user Eisenhower) that Israel, France and UK were going to invade Egypt because Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal. I quote Morley:

“Angleton’s influence on US-Israeli relations between 1951 and 1974 exceeded that of any secretary of state with the possible exception of Henry Kissinger. His influence was largely unseen by Congress, the press, and other democratic institutions, and much of the CIA itself.”

I note that Angleton was not a Jew, therefore to speak against him cannot be said to reflect anti-semitism.

Moona:  Is that all you have to say about Angleton?

Guyénot: Yes, until I discuss Dimona, below.  So now for Jack Ruby. He is known to the public for having shot Oswald, which he said he did in order to spare Jackie Kennedy from having to watch a trial of her husband’s killer. That is ridiculous but media reports things like that an no one laughs.

Ruby was the owner of a strip joint, the Carousel Club. One of his dancers, Gail Raven, said: “He had no choice… Jack had bosses just like everyone else.”  I think we have a very clear picture of who his bosses were: Gangsters for Zion.  Even his being allowed to enter the police room where he shot the patsy was covered by his alibi of being a translator for the Yiddish Press.

Importantly, I also hold that this Zionist criminal organization in Dallas included Abraham Zapruder, and that he was hired to film the assassination. As I note on p 82 of my book, “The Unspoken Kennedy Truth,” Zapruder didn’t flinch as shots were fired behind him. He sold his film to Life magazine for $50,000, but in fact the government seized it.

The Government doctored the film to disguise the fact that Kennedy was shot from the front, and therefore Oswald is not the killer. I do not know which particular persons in the CIA made sure that this doctoring was done. But it must have been they who employed Zapruder to do his famous job.

Moona: Will you now position Johnson into all of this?   

Guyénot: Yes, but I first must talk about Dimona. I endorse what James Douglass said in his book “JFK and the Unspeakable” (2008) that Kennedy had character and vision and wanted to build lasting peace, but was up against the hawks of the military and intelligence establishment. Bit I disagree with Douglass’ exoneration of Johnson.

Consider that Kennedy and Ben Gurion had a correspondence going, in which Kennedy tried to get Ben Gurion to join the move to nuclear disarmament by not joining the nuclear club in the first place.  Kennedy insisted on inspections of the Dimona plant, at the price of withholding aid, but Ben Gurion kept delaying a decision on that. Moreover, plutonium was snuck out of a nuclear plant in Pennsylvania over a period of several years. This enabled Israel to build two A-bombs.

Assuming that Israel had every intention of joining the nuclear club, JFK was in the way. He needed to be disposed of. When you look at how aggressive Israel subsequently became in the Middle East, it is not too much to think an assassination had to happen in 1963.

Once Johnson was in office, everything went in Israel’s favor. And he did all that was needed, including endorsing the Warren Report, to have the nation believe the assassination was the work of a lone gunman. As far as I can see, this new US president participated in harming the Non-Aligned Movement, that is, countries that did not want to be in the camp of either superpower: US or USSR.

Thus, when Egypt’s Gamal Nasser stood out as a great leader of the NAM, Johnson backed Israel’s effort to get rid of Nasser.  This 1967 affair included the planned attack by Israel on the USS Liberty. Many American sailors died as a direct result, which of course means Johnson committed high treason.

***

Rep Moona: Now we come to a little-known theory of the assassination, thanks to Prof Greg Poulgrain of Australia, who thinks Indonesia was involved. How can this be?

Prof Greg Poulgrain: My story about Indonesia is somewhat parallel to that of Guyenot’s story about Israel at the time of JFK’s death in 1963.  In both cases, Kennedy was ready to support self-determination of new countries – ‘new’ in the sense of being recently released from European empires. Egypt had been partly controlled by Britain, and Indonesia was, until 1949, a colony of the Netherlands.

But instead of Angleton as the traitor, I name Allen Dulles (1893-1969).  It’s true that Kennedy fired Dulles as head of CIA in 1961 but there was still opportunity for Dulles to play behind the scenes in 1963.  Basically, Dulles represented the interests of Standard Oil, that is, Rockefeller.

Rep Moona: Was there oil in Indonesia?

Prof Greg Poulgrain: Yes, and copper, but there was also another rich resource, gold, high up in New Guinea’s ‘Alps.’ Here is another comparison of Dulles and Angleton.  Just as Angleton had known that Israel was stealing plutonium in Pennsylvania yet did not pass that vital information to his president, so, too, Dulles knew that the Rockefellers had their eye on the unannounced discovery of a huge gold mine yet he stayed mum.

I’ll put this crudely: Standard Oil, i.e., Rockefeller and therefore Sullivan and Cromwell Law Firm, wanted the gold and knew how to get it with the aid of the CIA and also the US Navy. This meant keeping JFK in the dark about it. The poorly informed president was trying to help Sukarno, Indonesia’s leader. JFK would give them economic aid and he would help them in regard to a confrontation with Malaysia.

Dulles wanted to stop American support for Sukarno. But in November 1963 President Kennedy agreed to pay a visit to Jakarta (capital of Indonesia) in early 1964. Oh-oh. This would have made Sukarno popular throughout the Third World. The solution was: assassinate JFK.

Moona: But how does that tie in with setting Oswald up as the patsy in Dallas?

Poulgrain: Funny you should mention it. I have been digging away on this case for forty years. I found out that Allen Dulles was friendly with the father of George de Mohrenschildt around 1920. Allen was only 27 at the time and not yet part of the US government. George’s Dad was  Baron Sergius von Mohrenschildt – he was negotiating with Rockefeller’s Standard Oil. 

The dealing occurred in Constantinople (known today as Istanbul, known in Roman times as Byzantium). Anyway, his son George committed some sort of crime in regard to Standard Oil and needed to escape so went to New Guinea, which was then part of Indonesia colonized by the Dutch. Although I cannot tie George de Mohrenschildt to my theory of Allen Dulles arranging for JFK to be killed, I can say that it looks like it, because George became the handler of Lee Harvey Oswald.

To repeat the correct Oswald biography: Lee was in the US Marines and then got recruited for the CIA.  He was asked to act out a “defection” to the USSR (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) and may not have realized that this would make him suitable later as a patsy. The American public fell for the story – which was kept alive right up till today – that Lee liked communism.

“Sure, he likes communism so he would naturally kill the US president!”

Upon his arrival back to the United States, Lee was accompanied by his Russian wife Marina and their two small children. A Dallas resident, George de Mohrenschildt, befriended Lee and another Dallas person, Ruth Paine, befriended Marina and the children, even moving them into her home when Lee went off to New Orleans in 1963. Upon Lee’s return, she got him a job at the Texas School Book Depository, now famous for its 6^th floor window. Imagine that.

Moona: How did Ruth Paine come onto the story?

Poulgrain: I don’t claim to know, but when asked by mainstream TV she stated that she wanted to practice her Russian. This had to do with her church offering some kind of help to Russian immigrants.  Ruth Paine gave a similar answer when asked by the Warren Commission. Don’t forget that Allen Dulles was a major player on the Warren Commission, so she would not have been grilled. I imagine you could invite Ms Paine to these hearings by the Task Force on the Declassification of the JFK Files. 

***

Rep Moona:  The five persons who have so far testified before me are still alive: Barr McClellan, Tyler Newcomb, Richard Belzer, Laurent Guyenot, and Greg Poulgrain. Now I will hear about a book written by John Coleman in 1992. The title is: “Conspirator’s Hierarchy; The Story of the Committee of 300.”  Coleman was born in 1935 and worked for Britain’s MI6, that is Military Intelligence 6, whose members spy on foreign nations, or on anyone. I am not sure if Coleman is alive but a reader has offered to speak for him. Welcome, O substitute for Mr Coleman.

John Coleman’s Reader: The book “Conspirator’s Hierarchy” is very sophisticated and I mustn’t pretend to be a master of it. So I will quote verbatim the various remarks Coleman makes about Kennedy, as such. This one is from page 17:

“The Club of Rome has its own private intelligence agency and also ‘borrows’ from David Rockefeller’s INTERPOL. Every US intelligence agency cooperates very closely with it, as does the KGB and the Mossad. The Club of Rome also has its own highly organized political and    economic Agencies. It was they who told President Reagan to retain the services of Paul Volcker, yet another important Committee of 300.     member.

“The Club of Rome, after playing a key role in the Cuban Missile Crisis [wow]attempted to sell its ‘crisis management’ (the forerunner of   FEMA) program to President Kennedy. Several Tavistock scientists went to see the President to explain what it meant, but the President      rejected the advice they gave. The same year that Kennedy was murdered, Tavistock was back in Washington to talk with NASA. This time the     talks were successful. Tavistock was given a contract by NASA which   was then farmed to the Stanford Research Institute and the Rand       Corporation.”  

Rep Moona: This is the first I have heard of Club of Rome or Tavistock, but I know RAND and NASA.

John Coleman’s Reader: This is from pages 139-141:

“What helped The Perkinses a lot was that Morgan was a powerful member of the Committee of 300, which enabled Thomas N. Perkins to rapidly   further his career in the China opium trade. All the Morgans and      Perkinses were Freemasons, which was another tie that bound them      together, for only Freemasons of highest rank have any hope of being  selected by the Committee of 300. ….

“In addition to his membership of Morgan’s elite bank, Newbigging     doubles as an advisor to the Chinese government. Opium for missile    technology, opium for gold, opium for high-tech computers — it is all the same to Newbigging. The way these banks, financial houses, trading companies and the families who run them are intertwined would perplex Sherlock Holmes, yet somehow they must be unraveled and followed if we are to understand their connections.

“The two-track entry into the United States of alcohol and drugs were products of the same stable occupied by the same thoroughbreds. First, prohibition had to be introduced into the United States. This was done by the British East India Company heirs who set up the WCTU, Women’s  Christian Temperance Union. In the case of those who railed against   the ‘evils of drink,’ we find they   were financed by the Astors, the Rockefellers, the Spelmans, the Vanderbilts and the Warburgs who had a vested interest in the liquor trade. On the instructions of the Crown, Lord Beaverbrook came over from England to tell these wealthy American families that they were to invest in the WCTU. (It was the same Lord  Beaverbrook who in 1940 ORDERED Roosevelt to get involved in Britain’s war.) …

“The drug trade has a connection with the murder of President John F  Kennedy, which foul deed stains the national character and will continue to do so until the perpetrators are found and brought to justice.  There is proof that the Mafia was involved in this through the CIA,

which brings to mind that it all started with the old Meyer Lansky network which evolved into the Irgun terrorist organization, and Lansky  proved to be one of the best vehicles for peddling cultural warfare   against the West.

“It is worthy of note that Tibor Rosenbaum’s bank was used by the     shadowy chief of British Intelligence, Sir William Stephenson, whose  right hand man, Major John Mortimer Bloomfield, a Canadian citizen,   ran Division Five of the FBI throughout the Second World War.  Stephenson was an early member of the 20th century Committee of 300.

“As I revealed in my series of monographs on the Kennedy assassination, it was Stephenson who master-minded the operation which was run as a  hands-on project by Bloomfield. Fronting for the Kennedy assassination was done through another drug-related front. Permanent Industrial Expositions (PERMINDEX), created in 1957 and centered in the World Trade  Mart building in downtown New Orleans.

“Bloomfield just happened to be the attorney for the Bronfman family. The World Trade Mart was created by Colonel Clay Shaw and FBI Division Five station chief in New Orleans, Guy Bannister. Shaw and Bannister  were close associates of Lee Harvey Oswald.”

Moona: I must tell you I am flabbergasted.

Coleman:  I will finish up. This is from pp 171 to 178:

“A second assassination bureau is in Switzerland. The operations were financed by the Oltramaire family-Swiss Black Nobility, owners of the Lombard Odier Bank of Geneva, a Committee of 300 operation. This group was also closely allied with Allen Dulles and Jean de Menil, an important member of the Committee of 300 and a very prominent name in the oil industry in Texas…. David Ben Gurion [was] a member of the    Committee of 300.

“In 1951 Sir William Stephenson of MI6 restructured it into a single unit as arm of the Political Department of the Israeli Foreign Office, with a special operations group for espionage and ‘black job’ operations. British intelligence gave further assistance in training and equipping. This service unit of the MOSSAD is never mentioned by name and is known simply as ‘The Guys’- merely an extension of British intelligence’s SAS unit who continually train and update them.   ‘The Guys’ and indeed ALL MOSSAD agents, operate on a war-time footing. The MOSSAD has a tremendous advantage over other intelligence services in that every country in the world has a large Jewish community. By studying social and criminal records, the MOSSAD is able to pick agents among local Jews it can have a hold over AND MAKE THEM WORK FOR IT WITHOUT PAY. The MOSSAD also has the advantage of having access to the records of all U.S. law enforcement agencies and U.S. intelligence services. Citizens of the United States would be shocked, angered and  dismayed if ever it was discovered just how much the MOSSAD knows   about the lives of millions of Americans, even those who are not political in any way.

“If such a person as John F. Kennedy should stumble onto the truth about who directs world events, and cannot be bought, he is assassinated. In the case of John F. Kennedy, the assassination was carried out with great attendant publicity to serve as a warning to world leaders not to get out of line.”

***

PART THREE — Kennedy and Maxwell

Note: In this part, the imaginary Congresswoman, Rep Moona, talks to two more persons, John F Kennedy, Jr and myself, Mary Maxwell. So far in these hearings, we have heard six book authors each answering the question Who killed President Kennedy? Roughly their answers were as follows:

1. Barr McClellan: Lyndon Johnson 2. Fred Newcomb: The Secret Service (with William Greer pulling the trigger), 3. Richard Belzer: the mafia, dovetailing with CIA, with reference to Cuba. 4. Laurent Guyenot: Israel (with help from James Angleton and Jack Ruby), 5. Greg Poultrain: Allen Dulles (working with Rockefeller on Indonesia’s gold) 6. John Coleman: “the Committee of 300,” under British control.

This is an unsatisfactory state of affairs 61 years after the 1963 tragedy. The Great Republic had a coup d’etat but since the media controls the public’s knowledge, most people think the assassination was done from the 6^th Floor of the Book Depository on Dallas’s Elm St. No, it was an undertaking of vast proportions, including resolute attempts to silence the voices of truth-seekers. Citizens urgently need to understand how our “open government” can act so secretly and can lie so prodigiously. To ignore the facts is to live in a fantasy.

Rep Moona: Mr Kennedy, I invited you to the hearing to see if you have anything to tell us about the assassination of your father.

Mr John F Kennedy, Jr:  I have no value as an eyewitness, as I was only approaching my third birthday when Dad was killed, and I wasn’t in Dallas. Whatever I may have to contribute to an understanding of the event is based on the strange life I lived after 1963 and particularly after my mother Jacqueline died in 1975. I have written a book about it, called “Stolen Identity.”

Rep Moona: The official narrative is that Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis died in 1994.

Mr John F Kennedy, Jr:  And there you have it!  It is called identity theft.  The lady who lived at Park Av, New York, was not the real Jackie.  I had witnessed my mother’s death by gunshot in 1975. Then, in 1994, that other (impostor) Jackie died. Similarly, my identity was handed over to a newcomer, the famous, dark-haired JFK Jr.  And then he died in a plane crash in 1999. I am trying to get the word out to the public that Identity Theft is common. It is often directed at very wealthy, unmarried people.  The impostor has no trouble cashing the real person’s bank account, selling her house, etc.

Moona: Your story sounds pretty unbelievable.

Kennedy:  But it will start to be believable as soon as people get used to it. I am using social media to tell my story, and already I have thousands of viewers who can easily see through the old deceptions. And I am trying to take legal steps to regain my identity.

Moona: In regard to the assassination, please tell us anything you’ve learned over the years from your special vantage point as a family member.

Kennedy: Thank you.  I am eager to tell. In fact, I am bursting to get it out before they kill me. Two things come straight to mind. People in power often use mind control on their slaves. The variety I am most familiar with is MK-Ultra.  The prospective victim is tested as to his vulnerability or suggestibility. If he looks like a good potential slave, he is trained by torture. Perhaps drugs come into it, but I myself was trained mostly by torture.

The idea is to keep the person from having his own will, and even his own sense of self. Much is done to make him feel degraded and scared. He also feels confused, as the part of the brain that should be showing him how to get from A to B is sort of wiped out. Much of his memory gets lost. Don’t take it from me – this stuff is all on the CIA’s website as “historical” material.

Moona: How can this help us understand the assassination?

Kennedy:  In two ways. First, when you find out that nice Americans – say doctors and teachers – have participated in such inhumane treatment of their fellow man (including children) – that opens your mind to the fact that humans can do terrible things, even though it is considered impolite to say so.  I believe a very large number of people knew about the assassination before it occurred and they simply went along with it. “It was the done thing.”

Second, I am pretty sure that MK-Ultra is a key to understanding that a lot of people are obeying bad instructions under a sort of hypnosis.  It is now well known that the technique, which was once called mesmerism, involves a skipping of rational thought.  The hypnotist is able to say “Go open the window” to his patient, and she is not going to say “That’s not a good idea, it is freezing out there.”  Or “My arm is sore; I can’t lift that window.” All she can do is go to the window and open it without fuss. This is in the nature of our brain, provided the hypnotist has used the right trick to get past the rational parts.

I’d like you to know that military are trained to “not think” and it looks as though media people are trained to “not think.” I mean someone is manipulating them. This is acceptable in an army, and how it is done in bootcamp is itself public information. But in ordinary society we should not tolerate this kind of slavery.

Moona:  OK. Anything else about the assassination?

Kennedy: Yes. From age 7 or so, after the assassination of my wonderful Uncle Robert in 1968, I lived with mafia people on a daily basis. Their god is Money. I want everyone to know how far the thinking of mafia people has penetrated our culture.  It allows many crimes to flourish, from money-laundering to identity theft to murder.

It is also likely that satanism has added to the problem of money and greed. I am unable to estimate the prevalence of satanic belief in US today but it is not miniscule. Most of the Satanists I know also go to normal church on Sunday to cover it up.  They also join volunteer organizations, perhaps to compensate. Anyway, if they are in MK-Ultra that is enough to help them not be bothered by scruple.

It may end up that my biggest contribution after getting liberated a few years ago, is to make known the extent to which mafia people are inside government now. It is huge, huge, huge.

***

Rep Moona: Mary Maxwell I see that you have a PhD in Political Science and you have written many books including “Prosecution for Treason.”

Dr Mary Maxwell: Yes, I also have a law degree and am especially interested in meting out punishment to persons who are harming our society by messing up the Republic.

Rep Moona: I give you the floor.

Dr Mary Maxwell: Thank you, I thought you might give me the floor.

I recently wrote a book entitled “The Historian’s Tale: The Amazing Return of President Kennedy’s Son.” While researching it, I had to wade through many old videos of President Kennedy. I was truly surprised at how people adored him. I was 16 when he died, so it was natural for me to be in the adoring crowd, but it was the atmosphere of trust and optimism that is so noticeable in these videos. Also, the tears that flowed at his funeral – we did not see, at any subsequent presidential funeral, such a display of emotion.

Therefore, what I want to say about the assassination has to do with the new road that we all went down after JFK’s passing. The deceitfulness of it all has become normal, almost required. We simply lie all the time, as M Scott Peck says in his book “The People of the Lie.” You can even see it in product advertisements. At the moment, the penchant for false identity and for the miracle of photoshopping has gone so far that, if you see a YouTube video featuring Melania Trump you have to squint to check if it really is Melania or someone doing a spoof. “Sky’s the limit.”

The fact that people are paying attention to your “Task Force for Classification of JFK Files” ought to provide a specific, well-defined opportunity for us to consider the entire JFK files as an exercise in lying, starting with the Warren Commission. We never heard a voice on TV or radio saying “Wait a minute! Wait a minute!” There are rules to follow. Let me name two:

First, lying under oath is a crime and a Commission can refer for indictment anyone who it sees lying. But the crime of perjury during investigations always goes unpunished. Why? Because the People of the Lie have to have an atmosphere in which people say “Oh, yeah, we lie. It’s natural.”  And no one gets picked up for perjury as that would make people notice that some folks are allowed to perjure themselves.  Best to keep that crime out of awareness.

Moona: Do you wish to point to specific lies in the Warren Commission?

Maxwell: Not exactly. I prefer to point to the hopelessness of the task of ferreting out lies until we all firmly state that it was a coup d’etat. For years, people were told that the assassination resulted from one man’s preference for Communism.  Oswald had both defected from the US to the USSR, and had been seen, shortly before 22 November 1963, handing out leaflets that said “Hands Off Cuba.”

The government was being wholly dishonest. Oswald was in fact a covert operative for the US Government, and of course some government employees knew this. So who made up the story? The purpose of it was to take all eyes off the real killer. And it was to add to Cold War fervor by saying “Oh that awful commie punk, Lee Oswald, harmed us!”

It is not enough that we reveal such trickery now.  We need to punish the guilty and make a big brouhaha over the fact that some powerful Americans have the nerve to do psy-ops like that on us.  My own career went off onto a tangent of trying to find the truth when a false-flag is present.  For example, the entire story of the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing is a lie.  The false flag said that a pair of brothers from Russia wanted to express their hatred for America, or something like that. 

Every media employee was required to babble the same nonsense. Every cop was required to show anger that an officer got hit by gunshot. Every defense lawyer was supposed to shut his mouth when noticing that the Public Defender of Tsarnaev was skipping every known protocol of due process, and that the judge’s behavior was way off the charts. Every priest was to get up in the pulpit and acknowledge that “the 3 deceased and other 264” victims needed prayers.

Moona: Hasn’t that Tsarnaev case been corrected by now?

Maxwell: Not in the least. In fact the US Supreme Court overrode a ruling from the Appeals Court that had reduced the prisoner’s sentence from death penalty to life in prison. It is now back to death penalty!

Each month that goes by, the hearts of America’s lawyers get hardened. They do know, deep down, it is wrong, but the way to deal with their own guilt for being silent is to say it is NOT wrong.  In his book “The People of the Lie,” Dr Peck, a psychologist, learned from a veteran that, after realizing he should not have stabbed innocent Vietnamese, he got over his guilt by stabbing them with even more gusto. Apparently, we all do that.

Moona:  Could you bring this back to the JFK assassination?

Maxwell: Yes. All of us, me included, have come to accept that any board of inquiry, such as the Warren Commission is a joke. Thus, when we really need a board of inquiry, or any way to pin down the truth, we all accept that there is nowhere to go. We are all contributing to this loss every day. Even your very own Task Force will contribute, unless you raise a flag of ideals – such as the ideal of honesty and the ideal of a society being able to punish wrongdoers. In fact, the Task Force is limited to examining the “Declassification.” Will you go further and declare that no declassifying of wrongly hidden documents can have any basis unless there is a stated premise that we are seeking the truth about November 22, 1963?

Will you say that we need to judge which of the documents are bold-faced lies? Will you say that a few media corporations have a monopoly and that this itself is criminal per the Sherman Anti-Trust Act? Will you say that some doctors altered JFK’s body so as to support the Oswald thesis, and that if such men are still alive, even if 99 years old, they must be punished?  Sure, they may have been confused about doing such a thing that day at Bethesda, but they have had 61 years to report it to society.

Moona: Who killed Kennedy?

Maxwell: I like the theory that the driver did it: Greer, a Secret Service man. If he did it, he was probably under mind control. So he didn’t actually do it. His boss did it. Who is his boss?  The six theories you listed above nominate: LBJ, the Secret Service, the mafia-with-CIA-and Cubans, Israel, Allen Dulles (for Rockefeller), and the Brits. Maybe all six are one entity. (Coleman says that the Myer Lansky gang evolved into Israel’s Irgun!)  Of the six, the Brits are probably at the top.

I think the Brits need a good stiff talking to.

Mary W Maxwell’s website is www.ConstitutionAndTruth.com. Her latest book, co-written with John F Kennedy, Jr is: “The Historian’s Tale.”  For sale at Lulu.com. She will go anywhere to lecture on this.