by RWA
1. SARS-CoV-2 (aka SARS 2, COVID-19 & Coronavirus) is a virus that first appeared as a human contagion in Wuhan, China in late 2019. It is less deadly but much more contagious than its earlier relatives known as SARS or MERS.
2. Like every new virus & many older ones, there was & still is no vaccine or possibly no medication that is able to assist humans to resist being infected by it, or once infected, to ameliorate its effects or to assist in recovering from it.
3. On 21 March 2020, Hydroxychloroquine was propelled into prominence by USA President Donald Trump publicly suggesting that it was effective in treating Coronavirus. At that moment, there was little to support this supposition. In the meantime however, evidence has increased to support its efficacy.
4. Regardless of this positive characteristic, Hydroxychloroquine can cause cardiac problems in various individuals, as can the Coronavirus. This is a dangerous combination, especially for patients with pre-existing heart problems. At this stage, I had become mildly interested in sourcing a possible medication to support my very healthy immune system, just in case it was unable to resist the virus.
5. I was forced to discount Hydroxychloroquine as a reasonable medication for my personal purposes, not because of the cardiac problems, but because it had been banned in its association with COVID-19 by the Federal Government, & even declared a poison by the Queensland Government!
6. My attention was then drawn to IVERMECTIN (IVM) by Professor Borody promoting his Ivermectin Triple Therapy (ITT). This combination certainly appears to be most efficacious, but I personally have a major reservation about its general use due to the inclusion of an antibiotic in the “Triple” combination.
7. Over the last few years, there has been considerable media warnings about over prescribing antibiotics & other forms of misuse leading to the reducing effectiveness of this valuable medication. This is a critical concern, so I have chosen to disregard ITT. However, I have continued my interest in IVERMECTIN as a totally independent medication.
8. I soon discovered that there is considerable evidence on the internet confirming the efficacy of IVERMECTIN. I have taken great care to ensure the veracity & validity of any evidence provided on the internet. I have even spoken personally on the phone to a doctor in her clinic in the USA. She has experienced 100% success rate with IVM, including with two patients who were so badly affected that they were in hospital on supplemental oxygen. After taking what I term a Standard Single Dose of 1×3mg IVM Tablet per 15-to-20kg of body weight, plus a couple of other supplemental medications, they were out of hospital in 3 days, & back at work shortly thereafter. For more information regarding the efficacy of IVM, see numerous references on the internet & also within my two letters (URL1 & URL2 below). Further information is also provided in URL3 & URL4.
9. Subsequently, I quickly became aware that IVERMECTIN could offer far more than just my own personal security regarding COVID-19. It could be easily applied to the Australian population. As a result, I am now promoting IVERMECTIN as a medication that should enable the quick recovery of any individual infected with COVID-19. This is especially true if a Standard Single Dose of IVM is taken (ie oral medication has occurred) within about 2 days of infection, or even better within 12-to-24 hours of infection. This is during the incubation stage before any symptoms become apparent.
10. Notwithstanding this basic principle of “the earlier, the better”, IVM will certainly accelerate the recovery of someone who is suffering COVID-19’s flu-like symptoms at home, or even someone who has become so severely afflicted that they have been admitted as a hospital patient & may even be on a respirator or receiving supplemental oxygen. Besides these recuperative qualities, evidence is emerging that IVM is capable of functioning as a prophylaxis (preventive).
11. These impressive qualities are delivered by a medication that is totally benign such that any side-effects are of little significance. This means that Australia’s senior citizens, the most susceptible individuals to COVID-19’s adverse effects, can use IVM with little fear of any consequential side-effects. This panacea-like quality should enable IVERMECTIN to drastically reduce the appalling Seniors Coronavirus death toll, probably to a figure of zero. In addition, recent tests have indicated that IVM is safe for use by children under 5 years of age, & by pregnant women.
12. The panacea-like quality of IVERMECTIN can only be properly exploited by IMMEDIATELY allowing unrestricted IVERMECTIN access to any infected Senior Citizen or any infected younger Australian who has been so severely afflicted that he or she is seeking medical attention at home or who has been admitted as a hospital patient. At the same time, unrestricted access should be granted to front-line medical staff, caregivers & then to critical community support staff such as police officers. Finally, unrestricted or controlled access should be granted, as any stockpiles of IVERMECTIN may allow, to the rest of the Australian population.
13. Merck & Co Inc of New Jersey, USA, is the licence holder & manufacturer of IVERMECTIN, while MSD (Merck Sharp & Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd) is the Australian subsidiary. I have approached MSD in writing about the stockpile situation, but it has politely declined to offer any information or assistance!
14. The IMMEDIATE & proper control of unrestricted IVERMECTIN access should also allow the IMMEDIATE easing & eventual ending of all Lockdowns, Social Distancing & Border Controls which are so unpopular & so detrimental to the Australian population & the economy!
15. By this relatively simple act of allowing unrestricted IVERMECTIN access as described above, the Government will enable a virtually immediate return to an almost-normal everyday life & a flourishing economy. The harmful effects of the Lockdowns (aka “enforced loneliness”) on the Australian community will begin to disappear. Consequently, there should be a decline in the “mental health pandemic” & life-quality issues such as stress, anxiety, depression, aggression, alcoholism, drug dependency, domestic violence, separation of families from loved ones & suicide.
16. There is absolutely no doubt that there is an urgent need to abolish the destructive Lockdown & associated procedures. To date, the only way in which the Australian Federal & State Governments have indicated that this will happen is with the release of a vaccine to combat COVID-19. That will not occur until 2021 at the earliest. The year 2222 has even been suggested recently by an expert. Meanwhile, infected Senior deaths will continue, as will the Lockdowns & their associated destructive consequences on Australia’s population & its economy.
17. There has hardly ever been a need for a more IMMEDIATE panacea, & that IMMEDIATE panacea is most certainly NOT a vaccination. After considerable research, I am convinced that the IMMEDIATE panacea is IVERMECTIN provided it is IMMEDIATELY made more accessible by the Government as discussed above.
18. As a result of IVERMECTIN’s benign qualities, proven after some 40 years of use around the globe, there is absolutely no risk or downside to the unlimited use of IVERMECTIN. Should the Government truly believe that the risk of adverse reactions to IVERMECTIN is a valid reason to continue to limit its availability, then the GOVERNMENT can easily resolve this problem by indemnifying itself & if necessary, the manufacturer (Merck) & similar entities. Indemnity could be quickly established in legislation with a ruling that any individual who takes (orally medicates with) IVERMECTIN for the sole purpose of combatting infection by COVID-19, does so at their own risk.
19. Should the Government still not be convinced of IVERMECTIN’s panacea-like attributes, it is now worth considering “risk versus reward”.
20. A list of URLs is given further below. In URL2 paragraphs 24 to 26 inclusive, I consider the “risk versus reward” of a COVID-19-infected patient taking (orally medicating with) IVERMECTIN compared with a patient NOT taking it. For the latter, the risk is extremely high that the patient will end up suffering from some or many of the prolonged symptoms & syndromes (aka “Long Covid”) including Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, renal & cardiac problems & even Parkinson’s disease. This list is not exhaustive, & it doesn’t even consider the hell involved with the initial recovery period. The patient also has the real risk of dying, especially if the patient is aged above about 60 & most especially if the patient is also obese or has some other pre-existing condition.
21. For the patient who does take one or maybe two Standard Single Doses of IVERMECTIN, the risk is extremely small because IVM has been proven to be such a benign medication after 40 years of use around the globe. The rewards however, for the Ivermectin patient are enormous. They include a quick recovery, far less pain & inconvenience because of the shorter recovery period, the probable avoidance of all the Long-Covid effects, a quick return to work & to a normal life, & the avoidance of death associated with well-meaning medical staff being restricted to aiding recovery without any specific medication to combat COVID-19.
22. When more than one infected individual receiving Ivermectin is considered, such that each individual in a community or in the Australian population is able to immediately utilise Ivermectin when COVID-19 infection occurs, then the lockdowns, etc can be removed, Australian businesses start to recover, unemployment decreases, the economy recovers, etc.
23. In the unlikely event that the IVERMECTIN does not provide the anticipated recovery, then nothing is lost except for the Au$50 that was spent for two packs of Stromectol!
24. The conclusion from the details above is that the rewards from taking IVERMECTIN far outweigh any risk involved! The logic of this is not only abundantly clear but it is also irrefutable. Yet the Government continues to turn a blind eye to IVERMECTIN & the absolute logic supporting it. This suggests that more nefarious matters are involved & that matter may well be money! Both the Government & the vaccine-producing companies are so financially committed to a vaccine, that they don’t want strong, even overwhelming competition from a very cheap, abundantly safe and highly efficacious medication like IVERMECTIN!
25. While vaccine-associated money may well be the real reason for the Government’s reluctance to make IVERMECTIN more accessible, the Government needs to take serious account of the situation that they have already created & will continue to produce by restricting IVERMECTIN in the past & now into the future. This matter is dealt with in more detail in my document Titled: “AN OPEN LETTER TO ALL OZ GOVERNMENTS: FEDERAL, STATE & SHADOW, TO THE MEDIA & TO OZ CITIZENS.”
26. As an aside, I might well be asked: “Why am I promoting IVERMECTIN?” Sceptics may reasonably assume that I am the recipient of some form of financial support to promote IVERMECTIN to such an extent. That is far from being the truth, so I now feel obliged to make the following declaration:
26.1. I hereby declare that I, the author of this document, receive absolutely no financial support for my efforts in promoting IVERMECTIN to combat & control COVID-19. My considerable efforts are literally because I abhor the empowering of inconsiderate bureaucrats & authorities to randomly invoke procedures like Lockdowns, Social Distancing & Border Controls with little regard for the consequences of their actions but which are so profoundly detrimental to the Australian population & the Australian economy!
27. I commend this document for IMMEDIATE consideration and the IMMEDIATE action of the Government and other relevant authorities.
Please feel free to contact me. I am available for discussion on any associated matter.
rwabcdey@yahoo.com, @RhodusRod Twitter
[Name and details supplied]
URL5
https://gumshoenews.com/2020/09/10/serena-teffafasby-class-action-suit-against-the-covid-nonsense/
What The FUQ? – Frequently Unanswered Questions of the “Australian Government” – Documentary
An excellent testimony re the fact that the onus is on every individual to do their own research and letter writing(“nobody else can do it for you”)
“All that wealth from minerals….so where’s it all going?”
Same place that taxes and compounding interest ends up.
Crown kabal freemasonry. For some everything, for most less than nothing equals debt in magnitude going to infinity, this is communism.
Previous comment, relative to video posted by Dee.
All the gold that is mined with the copper is never accounted for as far as I can tell.
Just another one
Dr Mike Yeadon former “chief scientific advisor” to Pfizer
https://www.brighteon.com/fd404ccb-7384-4246-b42b-78e363911b33
Beurocrats and authorities are all on the oligarchs payroll.
Their silence keeps their families away from hunger.
Like Karen says, “who’s you’re father, what school did you go to.”
The revolving doors of bribery blackmail and deception, in all corridors of influence, have us lockdown in lockstep for the reset. Events could not get any crazier, if they weren’t so tragic, but they are.
[…] 9. After considerable study of the facts associated with IVERMECTIN, I am convinced that it will act as a most effective and successful temporary substitute for the COVID-19 vaccination. I therefore earnestly commend it to the Government. IVERMECTIN is not only highly efficacious in combatting COVID-19; it is cheap and abundantly safe, unlike Hydroxychloroquine which has some dangerous side-effects! For more information regarding the panacea-like attributes of IVERMECTIN, see my document: “IVERMECTIN: RISK VERSUS REWARD.” […]
For those in COVID 19 dire straights, Ivermectin is available as a cattle wormer.
“no medication that is able to assist humans to ameliorate its effects” (no.2)
I’ve not had a flu for 15 years but horseradish sure saved me from suffocating from the last episode.
Others reckon it was pretty useless for them; there’s a huge variation re the effect of any given herb/med as evidenced by the “possible side effects” listed re all prescription drugs: There really is no such thing as a one-size-fits-all cure for anything.
Which is why no government should ever be allowed to promote, restrict or compel any aspect of healthcare
True, but what have you got to lose by trying it? Please read the paragraphs dealing specifically with “Risk versus Reward”.
Don’t try this medication!
Vaccine trials give people the shakes
(Natural News) Get ready for the depopulation kill shots that cause severe neurological damage and lobotomize anyone stupid enough to take them. Even mainstream media outlet CNBC.com is now reporting that vaccine trials conducted by Moderna and Pfizer are producing extreme side effects in trial subjects.
“High fever, body aches, headaches and exhaustion are some of the symptoms participants in Moderna and Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine trials say they felt after receiving the shots,” reports CNBC:
Luke Hutchison woke up in the middle of the night with chills and a fever after taking the Covid-19 booster shot in Moderna’s vaccine trial. Another coronavirus vaccine trial participant, testing Pfizer’s candidate, similarly woke up with chills, shaking so hard he cracked a tooth after taking the second dose.
High fever, body aches, bad headaches and exhaustion are just some of the symptoms five participants in two of the leading coronavirus vaccine trials say they felt after receiving the shots…
These are all symptoms of neurological damage occurring in real time
https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-10-01-coronavirus-vaccine-trial-subjects-report-extreme-exhaustion-headaches-cracked-tooth.html
CRISSCROSS what medication are you talking about,
IVERMECTIN to be clear – IS NOT – part of the vaccination BS, nor is it a vaccination.
Is a vaccine not a form of medication?
Large Study Concludes Mercury (in vaccines) Can Now Be Listed “As A Cause of Autism”
A new study published in Pediatric Health Medicine and Therapeutics has concluded that there is “as significant relationship between mercury concentration and autism.
Read the post
http://www.renegadetribune.com/large-study-concludes-mercury-can-now-be-listed-as-a-cause-of-autism/
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT Crisscross. This article is about a PARASITE DRUG.
And you’re on about Mercury now. That is a separate article. Find that one.
Alexander Downer talking up Sweden
It goes without saying that once a virus starts to circulate it must run it’s course;a lock-down won’t do anything more than slow said process down
As a government, by definition, is any entity that governs Aus certainly DOES have one.
As for keeping it at bay, I remain convinced that Everyman must “walk that lonesome valley”
I suppose you could say that voting implies consent.
What interests me about voting is the compulsion issue and the common misconceptions thereof.
Since the mid 90s a significant number of eligible Aussies simply haven’t put their names on the role, which, according to the LAW is a matter of personal choice. As would be expected, there’s been a concerted push to convince them otherwise, but when challenged the respective threats just sort of vaporise
Anyone is still talking Covid-19, which has never existed. The so-called pandemic is the normal annual flu which has never before been named a pandemic. This year’s flu has affected less people around the world than in some previous years.
While RWA is correct in pushing the use of Ivermectin, apart from informing the public, he is wasting his breath on politicians. This calamity was never anything to do with health, it is a tool to implement the wishes of the “One World Government” using the useful psychopaths Bill and Melinda Gates and Anthony Fauci.. They will of course make lots of money in the process, while killing millions of people. The plan is genocide, pure and simple.
If anybody cannot see this by now, there is not much hope for them.
Do you think the 1918 “Spanish Flu” exists?
Seems like killing millions is rather pointless. You’d want to be killing BILLIONS to make any significant difference.
So, what is the mechanism of action for killing these millions? How does it work, exactly?
And when can I expect this global pogrom? My investments (and probably yours) depend on a good answer.
Spanish Flu of 1918 Was Really a Bioterror Attack on Humanity
Did a Military Experimental Vaccine in 1918 Kill 50-100 Million People Blamed as “Spanish Flu”?
THE DISEASE WHICH KILLED SO MANY WAS NOT FLU OR A VIRUS. IT WAS BACTERIAL INJECTION.
“………………According to Gates, they injected random dosages of an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine into soldiers. Afterwards, some of the soldiers had symptoms which “simulated” meningitis, but Dr. Gates advances the fantastical claim that it wasn’t actual meningitis.
The soldiers developed flu-like symptoms. Bacterial meningitis, then and now, is known to mimic flu-like symptoms. (6)
Perhaps the similarity of early symptoms of bacterial meningitis and bacterial pneumonia to symptoms of flu is why the vaccine experiments at Fort Riley have been able to escape scrutiny as a potential cause of the Spanish Flu for 100 years and counting.
HOW DID THE “SPANISH FLU” SPREAD SO WIDELY SO QUICKLY?
There is an element of a perfect storm in how the Gates bacteria spread. WWI ended only 10 months after the first injections. Unfortunately for the 50-100 million who died, those soldiers injected with horse-infused bacteria moved quickly during those 10 months.
An article from 2008 on the CDC’s website describes how sick WWI soldiers could pass along the bacteria to others by becoming “cloud adults.”
“Finally, for brief periods and to varying degrees, affected hosts became “cloud adults” who increased the aerosolization of colonizing strains of bacteria, particularly pneumococci, hemolytic streptococci, H. influenzae, and S. aureus.For several days during local epidemics—particularly in crowded settings such as hospital wards, military camps, troop ships, and mines (and trenches)—some persons were immunologically susceptible to, infected with, or recovering from infections with influenza virus...................."
http://themillenniumreport.com/2018/11/spanish-flu-of-1918-was-really-a-bioterror-attack-on-humanity/
Much as I support thorough personal research into issues, RWA’s effort brought us nothing new and failed miserably in addressing the Triple Therapy. Considering that 70% of antibiotics go into meat and fish for human consumption, why would one stall at the inclusion of a tiny dose of Doxycycline. And what of the zinc component. That is pretty essential if one is to enable cells to resist the virus and prevent it replicating.
I found the entire tone of RWA’s contribution to be irritatingly naive; the primary presumption being that government is there to help us and that being presented with compelling evidence in support of ivermectin might well provoke a change in policy. Are you for real, mate?
RWA… You do not get into politics via a political party unless you have first satisfied the party movers and shakers that you unreservedly support whatever policies Wall St wants. This is what preselection actually means. Pauline Hanson, for example, told the Liberal Party bosses where they could stick their Wall St rule book, which immediately resulted in her deselection and disendorsement. The entire nation knows that story but it is replicated across Australia in the lead up to every elections.
I am not a doctor, nor do I have any knowledge of medicine. However, I can read and I have read the detailed recommendations of people like Borody, Yeadon, the CMO of the State of Uttar Pradesh, and the staff of that Canadian age care home, and that is good enouugh for me. At age 77, I can die with Covid or get me a supply of Ivermmectin, plus supplementary therapies. Hopefully, I can then arrange for this to become available to the 10,000 Aborigines here in Arnhem, almost all of whom have compromised immune systems.
I most certainly will not be adopting your purist attitude, nor your belief that government might listen to reason. This is the sort of Quiotiesque strategy that will precipitate hundreds more deaths and long-term injury.
[…] Gumshoe has published in the past (e.g., Risk vs Reward; 94-year-old recovery; Ivermectin) IVERMECTIN’s benign qualities, proven after some 40 years of […]