Home Corona Letter to Graham Brady on Leaky Vaccines and AstraZeneca Monkey Trials

Letter to Graham Brady on Leaky Vaccines and AstraZeneca Monkey Trials

52
Sourced from https://stiriinternationale.ro/

by Elizabeth Hart

It’s now known the covid-19 injections are ‘leaky vaccines’ that don’t prevent infection nor transmission. It’s claimed they provide dubious ‘protection’ of limited duration. But most people weren’t in need of this ‘protection’ as they weren’t at serious risk of Covid-19.
Now billions of people around the world, including children, are being set up for repeat shots with these experimental jabs, potentially for life.

How did this happen? This is what we need to track back now…

For instance, consider the monkey trial for the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine. This monkey trial demonstrated ‘the vaccine’ did not prevent infection nor spread. Should ‘the vaccine’ have proceeded to human trials?

LETTER TO GRAHAM BRADY

Date: Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:49 PM
Subject: Were ‘leaky vaccines’ deliberately spread round the world?

To: Graham Brady (Cc: Charles Walker, Desmond Swayne, Steve Baker, Mark Harper, lockdownsceptics, irreverendpod, conservativewoman, Emma McArthur, Nick Hudson, Peter A. McCullough, Peter Mozelewski, newstips@gbnews)

For the attention of: Graham Brady
Chairman of the 1922 Committee, UK Conservative Party

Dear Graham Brady, it’s clear now that the covid-19 ‘vaccines’ are actually ‘leaky vaccines’ that don’t prevent infection nor transmission.

In the case of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, this was known from the beginning, when the monkey trial demonstrated that the vaccine did not prevent the animals from catching or spreading the virus.

What consideration was given to this matter before progressing to human trials?

This must be tracked back now. Who decided to continue with the Oxford/AstraZeneca human trials, knowing that the monkeys could catch and spread the virus?

This was raised by Jonathan Ball, professor of molecular virology at the University of Nottingham in May 2020 when he said:

the vaccine data suggests that the jab may not be able to prevent the spread of the virus between infected individuals. “That viral loads in the noses of vaccinated and unvaccinated animals were identical is very significant. If the same happened in humans, vaccination would not stop spread,” he said. “I genuinely believe that this finding should warrant an urgent re-appraisal of the ongoing human trials of the ChAdOx1 vaccine.” (See in context below.)”

Graham Brady, I request that you initiate an urgent investigation into this matter.

The circulation of ‘leaky vaccines’ around the globe has interfered with the natural human response to the virus, and led to these medical interventions being repeatedly pressed upon billions of people. Some countries are now up to the fourth shot ‘booster’, e.g. with other products, such as the Pfizer and Moderna jabs, being used in conjunction with the Oxford/AstraZeneca jab.

In many instances, people are being coerced to submit to these defective jabs, e.g. in Australia, where State governments and employers are mandating the covid jabs for employment – No Jab, No Job. Public venues such as theatres, sports stadiums and football and golf clubs etc are also insisting patrons be injected with these ‘leaky vaccines’.

This is an unprecedented medical intervention being undertaken across the global population, against a virus it was known from the beginning wasn’t a serious threat to most people. The world population is now in the throes of a massive experiment – without valid informed consent. We have no idea where this is going. Most recently the omicron variant is being promoted as the latest threat, another variant which appears to escape the ‘leaky vaccines’. The threat of omicron is being beaten up in countries such as the UK and Australia, despite the fact that the country where this variant first appeared, South Africa, reports it is generally mild, see: From symptoms to transmission – why we must listen to South African scientists on omicron, Telegraph, 9 January 2022, copy attached.

Graham Brady, some historical articles in the Telegraph provide background re the monkey trial. An article titled Exclusive: Oxford University Covid-19 vaccine trial has 50 per cent chance of ‘no result’, 23 May 2020 (see attached), includes reference to the monkey trial conducted by Sarah Gilbert:

“When Covid-19 began to spread, Prof Gilbert decided to do a “little lab project” to see whether the Oxford technique could work on the new disease. Tests were promising, and in April six rhesus macaque monkeys were given single doses of the Oxford vaccine at a US lab, and were then exposed to the virus. A month later, all six monkeys were still healthy. (My emphasis.)

But further in the article it emerges the vaccine didn’t prevent infection nor transmission:

“Until last week, the Oxford vaccine was considered the clear frontrunner in the global race. Last week, however, a widely-reported article in Forbes cast doubt on the results of the monkey trial, suggesting that results actually showed the vaccine did not prevent the animals from catching or spreading the virus because traces were found in the creatures’ noses. (My emphasis.)

Prof Hill said the article was misleading because the monkeys had been deliberately “overdosed” on coronavirus in order to test for safety.

“The honest truth, I think, is that the author is a long-retired senior Harvard virologist, infectious disease guy. He’s not a vaccine developer,” he said.
“We used a really high dose and these guys gave it not just into the lungs and the nose. They gave it into the mouth, and they gave it into the eyes. They gave a huge dose. I mean, seriously, it’s that level of basic.”

Here’s the link to the Forbes article by William A Haseltine that cast doubt on the monkey trial: Did the Oxford covid vaccine work in monkeys? Not really. 16 May 2020.

In another article on the Telegraph, dated 18 May 2020: (See article attached – Doubts over Oxford vaccine as it fails to stop coronavirus in animal trials.)

“Jonathan Ball, professor of molecular virology at the University of Nottingham, said the vaccine data suggests that the jab may not be able to prevent the spread of the virus between infected individuals. That viral loads in the noses of vaccinated and unvaccinated animals were identical is very significant. If the same happened in humans, vaccination would not stop spread,” he said. “I genuinely believe that this finding should warrant an urgent re-appraisal of the ongoing human trials of the ChAdOx1 vaccine.

And

“Eleanor Riley, professor of Immunology and Infectious Disease at the University of Edinburgh, said there was both good and bad news in the most monkey trials:

‘Whilst the vaccine-induced neutralising antibodies and vaccinated animals experienced less severe clinical symptoms than unvaccinated animals (good), the neutralising antibody titres were low and insufficient to prevent infection and – importantly – insufficient to prevent viral shedding in nasal secretions (worrying).

If similar results were obtained in humans, the vaccine would likely provide partial protection against disease in the vaccine recipient but would be unlikely to reduce transmission in the wider community.‘” (My emphasis.)

Again, did that happen as Jonathan Ball suggested? Was there an urgent re-appraisal of the ongoing human trials of the ChAdOx1 vaccine at that time?

Graham Brady, this is important to consider now, as we know ‘the vaccines’ haven’t stopped infection or spread in the human population. These ‘leaky vaccines’ have been circulated around the world, with millions of people being coerced to have them repeatedly, trashing informed consent, and creating multi-billion dollar repeat covid jab markets.

This must be tracked back now.

I request your urgent response on this matter.

Sincerely
Elizabeth Hart
Independent person investigation the gross over-use of vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy. vaccinationispolitical.net

 

SHARE

52 COMMENTS

  1. https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/

    david icke gets a lot of bad press.. mainly because reptiles? but ya listen to him, sounds perfectly reasonable.. and well, unless one can show evidence otherwise.. ?? – it sounds good to me. ( this vid i mean, reptiles a whole nother topic )

    he has a good vid a bit over halfway down the above linked page..

    im often reluctant to share links ive not had time to investigate all to my satisfaction, but hopefully if anyone finds anything stinky ive missed here, i look forward to the lessons that i know this community will provide. and sharing is caring 😎

    • well – i wish i hadnt posted that now. not because david. anyway.
      still, the site will definitely appeal to those that like that kinda stuff. of that im sure. please carry on.

  2. If vaxxxines work, why do we have an exponential rise in cases all over Sydney?
    From where I sit, the ‘virus’ seems to be targeting the youth in their twenties and early thirties. The double jabbed and now third with booster shots. Facts are this age group is coping the brunt of the bio weapon attack. People need to realise, as injection numbers increase cases spike accordingly. The vaxxx is not one size fits all, there are variations with people given shots relative to social credit score, maybe?
    Or it’s just ‘throw the dice’ with random vials 1,2,3 etc, WHO knows? Either way, it must be clear by now, the governments are intentionally enforcing genocide.
    This cold blooded deception must stop, the perpetraitors arrested and shot with boosters weekly, to see how they react humanely

  3. https://thevaultproject.org/professor-ehud-qimrons-letter-to-the-israeli-ministry-of-health-its-time-to-admit-failure/

    Professor Ehud Qimron’s Letter to the Israeli Ministry of Health, ‘It’s Time to Admit Failure’

    Professor Ehud Qimron is the head of the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at Tel Aviv University and a leading Israeli immunologist. Qimron, on Jan. 6, 2021, wrote a powerful letter sharply criticizing the Israeli Ministry of Health and the global management of the COVID pandemic.

    The letter summarizes the many failings of the lockdown-based pandemic policies of the last two years, the failure to properly track vaccine adverse events and blatant censorship and disregard of science. The English translation of the letter was originally posted by Swiss Policy Research. We are honored to post the English translation from Hebrew here and encourage experts in the scientific community to continue to speak out.

    • Should be used as a template re confronting every Aus State premier
      Albeit the fact that the destruction of an essentially rotten economy has actually been auspicious
      And the fact that kids have wound up getting the best education ever

  4. Legal Remedies for all Australians
    (regarding the actions of a totalitarian state)

    Read on –

    https://corpau.blogspot.com/2021/12/legal-remedies-for-all-australians.html

    As seen in a video with Rob at Flagstaff Gardens, Melbourne Vic on 18th December 2021.
    [The colony called] Australia follows the Westminster system.

    3 Tiers of Government – Parliament (Bills/Law)
    – Judiciary (Judges)
    – Executive (PM, ministers, etc (incl. CHO)

    The Chief Health Officer’s directives are ‘Public Policy’.

    This means they are binding only to the Public Service and not the general population.

    Public Policy is NOT binding on the police, as they are officers of the Crown.

    Public Policy is NOT binding on the judiciary.

    Within a hidden video recording by Marty Focker, interacting with Victoria Police personnel,
    Victoria Police are aware that Covid fines are unlawful where they get dismissed by the courts.

    The Covid fines are withdrawn as they are ‘Public Policy’.

    The remedy (for Covid related charges) within Australia is ‘Human Rights’.

    Victoria’s Public Health and Wellbeing Act is used in response to COVID-19.

    There is no such override within the above mentioned Act.

    The Act MUST contain an override in the preamble that parts of the Act overcome the Charter of
    Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006.20 December 2021
    Legal remedies for all Australians (against a totalitarian state)

    Within Victoria, the SARC (Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee) states:
    “The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 provides that the Committee must
    consider any Bill introduced into Parliament and must report to the Parliament whether the Bill is
    incompatible with Human Rights.”

    Therefore ALL law MUST be compatible with human rights.

    Even IF the CoHR&R Act 2006 could be overcome there is Commonwealth law that must be dealt
    with;
    Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (The Constitution),
    Section 51 (xxix) External affairs.

    ‘External affairs’ is something referred to as the treaty making powers of the Commonwealth.

    From the Australian Government | Attorney-General’s Department on the International human rights
    system, the following is stated:

    1 of 3
    “Human rights are codified in international agreements or treaties between governments, called
    conventions or covenants. International human rights treaties provide an agreed set of human rights
    standards and establish mechanisms to monitor the way that a treaty is implemented. By ratifying a
    treaty, a country voluntarily accepts legal obligations under international law. “

    ‘Obligations’ means duty, that being it MUST be carried out.

    Those in government do not want you to know about your ‘human rights’ and the treaties held.

    Your REMEDY is within:

    Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

    NOTE: There is a committee within the federal parliament that MUST examine every single Bill
    presented to see if it conforms to the treaties.

    If the Bill does not conform, then it’s ULTRA VIRES (outside of power)!

    International law overrides The Constitution.

    If the state makes a law that contravenes a treaty, Section 109 (of The Constitution) states:
    – 109. Inconsistency of laws:

    When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the
    former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.

    Examples of treaties used in law:

    1). With reference to the “Tasmanian Dam Case” Tasmania lost to the Commonwealth, when the
    Commonwealth used a treaty to stop the dam project.

    2). Corinna Horvath was assaulted by Victoria Police in her own home, where after a very lengthy
    legal battle, her claim (against Australia) went to the UN Human Rights Commission, where Australia
    lost.

    From 2014, Victoria Police personnel are aware of remedies via human rights.

    NOTE: The ‘mandates’ are FALSE.

    If there was any lawful power to (forcibly) vaccinate people, then that would be reflected within the
    Public Health and Wellbeing Act, BUT the authorities know this cannot be done as a result of the
    TREATIES in place.

    So, the alternative is to subterfuge, threaten with fear, force, coercion violence and threats of
    incarceration.

    The government of Victoria is responsible for all the above actions against the general population.
    Call their BLUFF!

    Under Section 75 of The Constitution, “In all matters: (i) arising under any treaty”.

    If the state is not co-operating in abusing your rights under the treaty’s protections take your matter to
    the High Court of Australia, with the view to a Human Rights Commission enquiry.
    2 of 3

    NOTE: The authorities do not want you to know about/use human rights in court.

    Addendum: Vic premier Andrews stated: “Seriously, one more comment about human rights …”
    https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/6851881/seriously-one-more-comment-about-human-rights/

    References:
    Separation of powers: Parliament, Executive and Judiciary
    https://peo.gov.au/understand-our-parliament/how-parliament-works/system-of government/separation-of-powers/

    Victoria Police admission on hidden camera, source: Marty Focker:

    Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008, Victoria:
    https://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/in-force/acts/public-health-and-wellbeing-act-2008/043

    The Constitution:
    – Section 51 (xxix); external affairs
    – Section 75: Original jurisdiction of the High Court
    – Section 109: Inconsistency of laws.
    https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/Constitution

    Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006
    https://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/in-force/acts/charter-human-rights-and-responsibilities-act-

    2006/014
    Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee:
    https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/sarc/

    Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (The Constitution),
    https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2013Q00005

    International human rights system – Australian Government | Attorney-General’s Department
    https://www.ag.gov.au/rights-and-protections/human-rights-and-anti-discrimination/international-

    human-rights-system
    Remedy: Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
    Punishment
    http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/dfat/treaties/1989/21.html

    Treaties Committee:
    https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Treaties/Role_of_the_Committee

    ‘Tasmanian Dam Case’
    http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/1983/21.html

  5. High Recorded Mortality in Countries Categorized as “Covid-19 Vaccine Champions”. The Vaccinated Suffer from Increased Risk of Mortality compared to the Non-vaccinated

    By Gérard Delépine, January 11, 2022

    Gibraltar (34,000 inhabitants) started vaccination in December 2020 when the health agency counted only 1040 confirmed cases and 5 deaths attributed to COVID-19 in this country. After a very comprehensive vaccination blitz, achieving 115% coverage (vaccination was extended to many Spanish visitors), the number of new infections increased five-fold (to 5314) and the number of deaths increased nineteen-fold. Read more…

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/high-recorded-mortality-in-countries-categorized-as-covid-19-vaccine-champions-increased-hospitalization/5757173

  6. Court ruled today that Prince Andrew is nor spared from civil suit by Virgina Guiffre, by way of the 2009 settlement in Epstein case.

  7. Court ruled today that Prince Andrew is nor spared from civil suit by Virgina Guiffre, by way of the 2009 settlement in Epstein case.

    • Well, I believe that even Virginia Guiffre is part of the spiel as are the other girls that have testified, MKUltra or some other programming, it’s all theatre and make believe and I definitely do not believe that Epstein is dead, Ghislaine Maxwell was/is part of it as well and Prince Andrew, too, and there are plenty of everyday “epsteins” around – our daughter succumbed to their games with her life… There is nothing new under the sun and the more everything seems to have changed, the more it has remained the same.

      Live “love thy neighbor.”

      • There is no way Prince Andrew will be more bersmooched(che) by this “scandal”(they are endless even to this none((tabloid)) Royal watcher).

        He is a clever(handled cleverly) circuit breaker to this whole sordid episode.

        Virginia Guiffre, well she brought some smoke and would be mk probable anyway, if not a plant. I give her the benefit of the doubt here BUT I must acknowlege the thruth of the far more heinous activities that are connected here.

        To wit:
        Lolita Express
        Epstein Island
        Bill Clinton
        Clinton Foundation
        Haiti
        Submarine pilots

        • Andrew can handle a helicopter with the skill of budgie.
          As experienced at Exocet missile bait, he knows how to deploy as a flare with “no sweat”

      • It occurs to me that none of Virginia Guiffre’s complaints have been made off her own bat, that she has been, and continues to be, ACTUALLY pimped out by some invisible somebody or other.

  8. Here’s what I came across today, a comment to Rabbi Alon Anava’s awesome talk on YouTube:

    “The Greek word “techne” means “witchcraft”. With the words theocracy, democracy and technocracy we see the world going from being under the judgment of God, to under the judgment of man, to the current being under the judgment of witchcraft. See Strongs Concordance Greek #5078 and Rev. 18:22. The word technology is a composite of techne (witchcraft) and logos (the principle of reason or logic). Rev. 18:23 talks of sorceries which is the Greek word “pharmakeia”- see strongs #5331 and is just a mixing of potions.”

  9. https://swprs.org/professor-ehud-qimron-ministry-of-health-its-time-to-admit-failure/

    “It’s time to admit failure,” says Israeli professor

    In the end, the truth will always be revealed, and the truth about the coronavirus policy is beginning to be revealed. When the destructive concepts collapse one by one, there is nothing left but to tell the experts who led the management of the pandemic – we told you so.

    Two years later, you finally realize that a respiratory virus cannot be defeated and that any such attempt is doomed to fail. You do not admit it, because you have admitted almost no mistake in the last two years, but in retrospect it is clear that you have failed miserably in almost all of your actions, and even the media is already having a hard time covering your shame……..”

    It gets better…

  10. Prince Andrew, son of QE2, we are told stripped of titles (diversified income) and kicked out.
    We are told, sold his $30 million house to pay for lawyers, who have all year to gouge him.
    Taken on by one woman, we are told, so who is paying for the lawyers for this woman.
    It would seem the powers behind this woman are enough to shatter the British Royal Family.

      • As I recall you said she was a prostitute so no moral argument and I was saying she was there in order to tear him down so has your emphasis has now changed, or you are saying it is all theatre ? A lot of people saying everything is theatre and the British Royals like to play these games but I think the reason why they have been handing everything over to Swissy is because they can’t deal with the scrutiny, they got a better deal, slip under the radar, I place the turning point in the mid-70s when English unemployment took off, rising to 3 million under Thatcher.

        • By “throughout” I mean from the time she quit recruiting girls for Epstein and filed a claim against him.
          Given the lack of information re how she managed to score a job at the Mar-A-Lago Club I think it’s reasonable to conclude it had something to do with preexisting prostitution connections.
          Quite apart from which her 60 Minute interview fair screams “fake”

          • re: scoring jobs, the turnover at my local supermarket is amazing.
            I think you may be looking too hard for a good / evil dichotomy where things are more mixed and can change at a second’s notice.
            So you are saying this particular “theatre”goes back for decades …

          • It seems like faith-based fatalism to say everything is already written in a ledger, everything is pre-ordained, you can’t do anything, it’s all an illusion, if so then I’m conversing with a figment of an illusion.
            The muslims seem to be doing that, going through the motions while anchored to their faith, and they never have anything much to say about 9-11, they think they should just endure quietly, if muslms were jews and framed up for 9-11 they would never shut up about it.
            I digress slightly.

          • As the story goes she quit working for Epstein whilst looking for girls in Thailand because she happened to run into Mr. Wright.
            So far as I’m aware she’s never been asked anything along the lines of “so that meeting made you disenchanted with what you were doing”

            And how come said bloke remains so invisible ?

          • Well fair enough but a bit tenuous for me, I am looking for mainly for outcomes and Randy Andy going under a bus is an outcome I suppose, have to wait and see, certainly the lawyers will be loving it

  11. But back to the Melbourne doco:
    If everything on the planet wasn’t transitory there’d be no possibility of redemption for anyone.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.