Home Corona Mikovits, 5g, and Economic Collapse, Part II: Imagining Some Prosecutions and Lawsuits

Mikovits, 5g, and Economic Collapse, Part II: Imagining Some Prosecutions and Lawsuits

40
(L)  radio relay antennas on a Vodafone mast in Berlin. Photograph: Fabrizio Bensch/Reuters, (R) a gavel and block at Amazon.com

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

Part II picks up from Part I‘s section on “Moral Hazard.” That section identified some old English laws that Blackstone promoted as the means of protecting law itself.  I am very interested in keeping such law alive and well.

Or, should I say, “in making such law come back to life,” as it has been in a state of decay for a few decades. Moreover, there has been a cultural accompaniment to the decay of law.  Since the 1980s, people started to take it for granted that high-level criminals were somehow entitled to protection. What a complete nonsense. The point of law is to protect us from those guys, not to protect them.

Here is a reminder of some of the brazen flouting of law in the late 1980s: the Savings and Loan scandal was pursued only mildly, despite many people having lost their dough; the Iran-Contra affair was prosecuted so mildly by the Department of Justice that seven Bushites got convicted of only small crimes and then, as he was leaving office, President Bush, Sr, pardoned them.

Also, 1989 was the year the Washington Times headlined the late-night parties at the White House, hinting that the parties involved sex-with-little children.  Journalist Nick Bryant pursued the matter for years, with no uptake from law enforcement, and little from the public.

Luckily, today, many people have woken up to false flags, of which the 9-11 mass murder is the most prominent.  In this new series of articles I deal with three problems – Judy  Mikovits’ revelations about Covid-19, for which there’s not much published research yet; the 5g affair, which  has been studied for a while and has an organized protest movement worldwide, and “economic collapse” – about the collapse of businesses via the mandatory lockdown during the pandemic.

It Helps To Name Some “Causes for Action”

The article at hand will imagine some prosecutions and lawsuits. Let’s start with the terrible rollout of 5g (“fifth generation” Internet technology).

5G is well understood and its promoters boast about it openly, so it’s not like trying to talk about secretive bioweapons. Oh wait, maybe it is a bioweapon. Certainly we (the United States) dropped an atomic bomb on Japan in 1945, causing lethal radiation sickness. We did not do this by accident; it was a weapon used in the heat of war (which, by the way, violated a once well-accepted law of warfare: don’t attack civilians).

Chemical weapons, too, have been used by the United States. For example, Agent Orange was sprayed on trees in Vietnam in the 1960s. The excuse was that it could eliminate the ground cover in which soldiers of our enemy (the Viet Cong) hid themselves. Yet that may not have been the true rationale — weapons manufacturers may have been finding ways to destroy the environment just for the hell of it.

Note: you don’t have to be clear as to the identity of the defendant when you start a lawsuit.  If you aren’t sure who the troublemaker (the “tortfeasor”) is, you can start by calling him/her “John Doe/Jane Doe. “ Later, when you are well into the case, you may begin to figure out the correct identity.  If it is a crime you are reporting to the authorities, the name is often omitted.  “My house was burned down last night. I have no idea who set the fire.”  The police must investigate; they must find John/Jane Doe.

Have You Been Injured by 5G?

The 5G “rollout” has been going on since 2018. It consists of cell towers being set up, and radio transmission being sent out by them. The stated purpose of 5G is to enhance the capacity and speed of cell phones or related devices. The rollout is being done by the manufacturers and providers, such as Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T. In the United States, those companies purchased bandwidth from the Federal Communications Commission, the FCC.

There could be several grounds for seeking indictment over 5G (this requires that you specify a crime suing or suing someone (which requires that you specify a tort). Let us start with torts – the various types of injury a person may suffer.  Among the available torts are: assault, battery, trespass, vandalism, unnecessary infliction of emotional distress, and fraud. Those torts are well-established in law. You can claim monetary damages as the remedy for the injury.

“Battery” means you have been physically touched in an unwanted way – whether by being hit violently or non-violently. “Assault” means you have been made to feel apprehensive that something bad will be done to you. “Trespass” means an uninvited person has entered your home or your personal space. “Vandalism” means someone has damaged your property. “Infliction of emotional distress” means someone has infringed on your peace of mind. “Fraud” means someone has deceived you.

5G Crimes

The relevant crimes could include assault and battery (those are crimes as well as torts), destruction of property, cruelty to animals, and violation of civil rights such as the right to life). Since 1966, in the US, we have had civil rights laws. The one that is codified at 18 USC 241 actually criminalizes the mere conspiring to deprive a person of rights, as follows:

“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

“If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured —

“They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.”

Ain’t law grand?

I will postpone, to a subsequent article in this series, a discussion of what you would have to demonstrate, as proof that 5G actually injured you.

Have You Been Injured by Economic Collapse?

It has been widely noted that the pandemic can bring about economic collapse worldwide. The personal injury of “financial loss” is a well-established tort. You can sue someone who deprives you of expected sales in your business. In normal times, if AA’s truck blocked the entry to your warehouse for 6 hours, you could sue AA for the money you lost during that period. During the pandemic, your business may have suffered losses due to the mandatory lockdown.

In this article I strictly limit the discussion of how law can help with economic losses incurred by way of the mandatory lockdown. That is an arbitrary choice by me, in order to simplify matters.  Clearly the pandemic is causing other kinds of economic disruption, too.

Note: this exercise will bring up the issue of sovereign immunity. You cannot sue a government unless certain conditions apply – one of them being that the government has given you leave to sue.

Crimes of Economic Collapse

As for there being a crime connected to the lockdown, I would nominate, first of all, treason.  The intent to harm the US economically has apparently been present for more than a century. The panic of 1906 was allegedly calculated by, and carried out by, persons who stood to gain from it. Ditto the Wall St crash of 1929 which resulted in the Great Depression. The perpetrators were American, hence they acted against their own countrymen.

In the US Constitution, the crime of treason was specifically limited to: “levying war against them [the states] or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.”  However, Chief Justice Marshall wrote, in United States v Burr (1807):

“…if war be actually levied, that is, if a body of men be actually assembled for the purpose of effecting by force a treasonable purpose, all those who perform any part, however minute, or however remote from the scene of action, and who are actually leagued in the general conspiracy, are to be considered as traitors…”

I opine that “for the purpose of effecting force” could easily be interpreted to include “for the purpose of effecting starvation.” The collapse of the economy may well include food shortage.

Sherman Anti-Trust Act

One more thing can be mentioned about litigation regarding economic collapse., namely the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890. It is still good law and it has provisions for criminal liability. It is in fact the ongoing responsibility of the Department of Justice to enforce this trust-busting law (though you wouldn’t want to be holding your breath till they do so). Here is the wording:

Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the court.”

Before getting to the third and final item, the Mikovits revelations, let me confess that I have an agenda here.  It is the same agenda I usually have when “teaching law.” I want to wake up my fellow citizens to realize that the fact that governmental criminals have gone unpunished — or even indicted — does not mean that the law lacks good mechanisms for indicting and punishing them.  The law has fabulous mechanisms for whatever we need.  Could we please stop ignoring these?

Crimes Indicated in the Mikovits Revelations

Are you suffering an injury from the things revealed by Judith Mikovits, PhD? She is the coauthor, with former attorney (now schoolteacher) Kent Heckenlively, of two books: Plague (2014) — about the XMRV virus, and Plague of Corruption (2020) — about naughty goings on in government science labs.  In April 2020, she gave a few interviews that challenged the official line about the origin and nature of the coronavirus in Covid-19, and about the promised vaccine. (The letters COVID stand for corona virus disease; the 19 means it began in 2019.)

In this article I shall omit Mikovits first complaint, about the origin and nature of the virus. We can discuss both prosecutions and lawsuits in reference to her second complaint, vaccination of the population. During an interview Judy said that if a vaccine for Covid-19 is to be given to all Americans “it will kill millions.”

The crime of murder is well known, as is also its lesser counterpart: manslaughter.  Prosecutors charge a person with manslaughter if they estimate that they’d be unable to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, “intent” – which is a crucial element of a murder charge. They can get a conviction for manslaughter on the basis that the person caused the death negligently.

For the “future” crime that Judy Mikovits mentioned — the killing of millions via a proposed vaccination — there would be some urgency to identify John and Jane Doe.  I haven’t specifically heard Judy pinpoint them, but we do know she has got dirt on the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), which is in Atlanta, Georgia, and her former employer, the US bioweapons laboratory at Fort Detrick.

Mikovits has mentioned various corporate members of Big Pharma, too. When a corporation is responsible for a crime (rather than a tort), the officers can be held liable. Can members of government be liable for crime? Yes, of course. What a silly question.

Note: when discussing, above, the damage done to people by the 5g rollout, I hinted at radiation, but postponed making a case for it. Similarly, here, I shan’t not stop to elucidate Judy Mikovits’s explanation of the biology related to vaccines. I ask you to “take her word for it” until later in this series. My mission is to inventory the possibilities for court action.

Injunctions

In regard to Mikovits’ warnings about the forthcoming dangers of vaccination, one possibility is to get an injunction, that is, a court order to halt the plans for manufacturing the vaccine. That is the whole point of injunctions – to prevent something from happening that, if done, could not be undone.

(Normally, if you think a crime is about to happen – say, car theft — you tell the police and then the matter is in their hands. But for such a massive crime as the one Mikovits predicts, the killing of millions, I assume that “law enforcement personnel” would want to have the written authority of a court order.

In your attempt to get an injunction against the policy of vaccination, it may be advisable to name the vaccine manufacturers, rather than the government, as the target of the injunction. There is a problem of courts not wanting to tell government what to do. (CDC is an agency of the US government.) The judiciary says that it does not get involved in “political questions” as it is their job to apply the law not to make the law.

Although I have seen the court wrongly dismiss cases (e.g., Maxwell v Trump 2018) on the basis of the political question, I do side with the principle in general. Citizens should use the ballot box rather than the jury box to get government to serve the people.

Lawsuits for Vaccine Injury

Suing for injury actually received by vaccination is a bit tricky. In 1986, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. The NCVIA is undoubtedly a case where the legislation gets drafted by an interest group and then bulldozed through Congress. This 1986 Act prevents pharmaceutical corporations from being sued. Quite a feat given that the Seventh Amendment in the Bill of Rights guarantees that “In suits… the right to trial by jury shall be preserved.…”

Hundreds of thousands of families, who have seen their child fall sick shortly after being vaccinated, got turned away by district courts, and appeals courts, on the grounds that the 1986 Act provided for a special court. Congress is allowed to establish courts, per Article III, section 1 of the Constitution:

“The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”

Personally, I do not see the Vaccine Injury Court as a court. The Act designed a scheme whereby the vaccine manufacturers pay a tax on the sale of every dose of vaccine it sells, and that makes a fund out of which compensation for injury may be paid to a plaintiff. The plaintiff must name “the Secretary of Health and Human Services” as the defendant in every case.  (See?) The plaintiff’s lawyer gets paid whether or not he wins the case.  I consider the NCVI Act to be in conflict with the Constitution’s Article III and the Seventh Amendment.

Who would fight this? You may expect it would be the parents, but most parents are completely done in by the injustice and humiliation doled out to them. The case of Brusewitz v Wyeth (2011) reached the US Supreme Court, but this did no good (except for a blessed dissent filed by Justice Sotomayor, with Justice Ginsberg joining).

I conclude this Part II of the series by noting that a ”vax injunction” may be appropriate. Just as you can ask a court to order that the plan for nation-wide injections be halted, you could ask the court for an injunction against you or your family being injected. Your cause-of-action would be that “ the contents of the vaccine are lethal.”  This approach should at least be tried. We need to find out what our relationship to the law is – and what the court’s relationship to the law is!

 

 

40 COMMENTS

  1. I lost all confidence in the Australian legal system. It is not a joke, it is a fraud. It is part of the control system, it is not a justice system.

    When the law becomes so corrupted that the people no longer respect it, then the strong fist of tyranny appears. That is where we are now. It is only a matter of time when that violence is reciprocated.

    There was a reason the Australian Government wanted the Aussie citizens disarmed, they knew from what they had planned that day of violent push-back would eventually arrive.

    Got bullets?

    • “it is a fraud” — I have to agree, unfortunately. From humble experience in South Australia leads to one conclusion. Law in the lower courts do not really apply. Rules of common law seem to not exist. But, for example, is the Youth Court really a court? Maybe more like Tribunal rooms — extensions of a government department. I would like to be enlightened.

      • “Law in the lower courts do not really apply.” The reason you felt like you could write that is that you have no experience in the UPPER courts. How do you think this absurdity could exist if the upper courts weren’t allowing it?

        The Rule of Law has died in Australia, the upper courts are not ‘Guardians of the Rule of Law’, they are ‘servants of the Crown’, in other words ‘go-fers’.

      • I done told you, Your Bossness. The Youth Court is an arm of the DCP (Dept of Child Protection), and the DCP is an arm of the police.

        I mean legally, officially, that is so. Hence, as you suggest, it is not really a court. In this dear Western world, a judiciary is independent of the parties in a case.

        The judges at Youth Court must do what one party, the Prosecution, tells them to do — as you have tragically found out.

        Personally, I deduce that the aggrieved Protective parents do not have to obey a “court order” from a non-court. Confuciius say: “It is the beginning of wisdom to call things by their right names.”

        The correct name for the DCP (I wish I were kidding) is: Member of the International Child-trafficking Crime Syndicate.

        The resemblance of our DCP to that of UK is so close that it can’t be anything but a unity.

        WE SHOULD NOT CONTINUE TO TOLERATE THIS.

        See: https://gumshoenews.com/2020/04/27/south-australias-underworld-includes-killers-bagmen-child-molesters-police-lawyers-and-judges/

        (and thanks again to Kevin Woodman for the tip-off)

        • I know you told me it is an arm of the department. But that’s what my letter questions — Who is above the Chief Executive of the DCP? Also easy to say you don’t have to abide by a court order. How do you prove its not a court? Easy to say when we’re the ones far from the action. If a mum did that would the troopers come in, and do the bidding of the department AGAIN — and stomp her lights out?

          • YB, my article with the paintings by Salvador Dali tells who is above the Chief Executive. It’s all in the Video photo.

            What would they do to a mum who fails to abide? I suppose the same thing they would do to any Chief Executive who would fail to abide.

            Either may be killed. I assume Freda Briggs was killed, a la Nancy Schaeffer. To “hide” the death of the latter they said her husband killed her and then turned the gun on himself. The sort of thing every loving husband does….

            I believe the takeover is going to be completed soon and then it’s Room 101 for all us goodniks. Law of entropy type thing.

            Ha ha Dee, yo thought I was going to say something cheerful.

  2. Here is a thought for Gumshoenews followers. Are we, as a group the only intellectuals in Australia, including Mary of US, who has seen through this false-flag event and have investigated the knowledge of medical people and scientists about Coronavirus (any virus) habits?

    It has crossed my mind that, to my knowledge, no brains-trust of our industrial and commercial world here in Australia, seems to have come to the conclusion that the Covid-19 hoax is actually what it is. If they have, why have they kept silent?

    Is it because the management of companies like Coles, Woolworths, Bunnings, B P Petroleum and other oil companies, the airline industries, tourist industries, rural industry bodies, mining companies, entertainment industries and so forth are in cohorts with the WHO and the Central Bankers that are perpetrating this massive fraud? Or has the Cabal already taken full control of these and other institutions?

    The alternatives are that the people running these groups are not very intelligent at all, or are on the Government “gravy train” and are not willing to upset the status quo.

    This group, should not only be upset, but furious that most of their businesses are being put under financial pressure. This group would have, between them much larger resources and financial backing to investigate this fraud, than a small group known as http://gumshoenews.com

    • Mal, many of them are just waking up. My wife had a dental appointment and the dentist commented that he lived in an ‘alternative universe’, in other words he had taken the ‘Red Pill’.

      My wife joked with him that you sound just like my husband. When I arrived to pick her up he started asking me questions, I answered a few and then said “what do you know about the Port Arthur Massacre?”. When I told him Bryant was innocent, he flipped out “NOOOO! You’re kidding me, you mean he was a patsy!”

      I sent him some stuff on PA and a few other things. He asked me about Global Warming and I told him about my run-in with the Australian Greenhouse Office and then sent him the Gumshoes link to the discussion on the GSM. He also flipped out on that topic. He may have taken the Red Pill, but he has just started his education.

      Unfortunately, although many people are waking up, it is getting late in the game. I offered to write an article for Dee on individual farming, things like Permaculture, soil analysis, etc. However, at this late in the game they will starve before they get their ducks in a row. Kinda like, ‘got bullets?’, – however, all the gun shops are closed, now what are you gonna do?

        • OK, I’m not a real farmer, just a hack who has made a lot of mistakes to learn from. I’ll include some links to real information from very experienced individuals.

          I also mentioned “Got bullion?” – I bought some gold sovereigns at A$184 a coin, I see they are A$618 today. Next month they should be higher (prices fluctuate, but wait until the price suppression collapses, but that is just a ‘conspiracy theory’ LOL)

      • I had a similar experience with my own dentist, his assistant and receptionist. I forget what triggered the conversation but I chipped in with “Have you heard of Dr Judy Mikovits, Dr Rashid Buttar (Butter with an ‘a’) or Professor Dolores Cahill?”

        They all KNEW something ‘stank’ but could not put their finger on it and didn’t know where to start. He had to shut me up by sticking a great big needle and paraphernalia inho ny nouf…

        Anyway, subsequent to my appointment they now have (by request) a USB stick with links to:

        • Dr Judy Mikovits
        • Dr Rashid Buttar
        • Professor Dolores Cahill
        • Drs Daniel Erickson and Artin Massihi
        • Professor Klaus Püschel
        • Dr Wolfgang Wohard
        • Dr Andrew Kaufman
        • Professor Johan Giesecke
        • Professor Sucharit Bhakdi
        • Professor Knut Wittkowski
        • Dr Shiva Ayyadurai
        • Dr John Ioannidis
        • Dr Annie Bukacek
        • Dr Larry Palevsky
        • Sayer Ji
        • David Icke
        • Amazing Polly
        • Spiro Skouras
        • Ivor Cummins
        • Eva K Bartlett
        • Vanessa Beeley
        • International Tribunal for Natural Justice (ITNJ)
        • James Corbett
        • Ty and Charlene Bollinger (The Truth About Vaccines – TTAV – entire series)
        • And various topical links from my archives.

        Oh, and I mentioned the Georgia Guidestones.

        The appointment of course was at “tooth hurtie” … Boom! Boom!

    • Stephen J Gray linked us to his website where he quotes Plato:
      “The prisoner grows to love his chains” – Plato

      And Gray offers this quatrain:

      Now we know, when we next create a major suspension of freedoms
      That You will obey, and accept whatever is our planned reasons.
      And, after we have all of You, vaccinated, chipped, and numbered
      You will be ready once again, for another lock-down, when duly ordered.

  3. VERY IMPORTANT EXPOSURE?

    Mary, want to sue your doctor or government likely control of treatments for the virus?

    Will we be able to refuse vaccines if there is an alternative treatment for the virus?

    Do we have or not have control of what some fascist government wants to enforce into our bodies when there is an alternative treatment that we will take voluntarily?

    Just listen from the 24 minute mark at the X22 report to the end.

    https://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2020/05/x22report-were-back-you-must-show-them-only-then-will-people-have-the-will-to-change-great-video-3523162.html

    Does the Queensland GOVERNMENT still fine doctors prescribing HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE up to $13,000.
    If so, WHY?

    If the Hydroxy …… does work or may work, but was refused by fascist government toadies to be available, whom may be sued if death results whilst awaiting a alleged vaccine cure to be sprung from a pharma’s magician’s hat to steal billions from the people via blackmail? (No jab, no normal life!! NO PLAYING FOOTIE!)

    Please pass this on to every doctor who treats you and ask the doctor if the doctor is going to refuse for you to at least try it with yours or a other patient’s consent. (e.g. your child)

    Going to be a lawyer’s picnic? Well, it will help get the economy moving.

    But, be on guard as to what the politician’s bring into law to protect their controlling pharma’s money contributions……………immunity for suit against manufacturers and distributors (doctors/ pharmacies) of the magician’s vaccine and even banning HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE. AS IN QUEENSLAN ALREADY by fining medical practitioners.

    So the law firms should be saving every but of evidentiary report, comment and opinion on the examination of hydroxychloroquine, before the vaccine pharmas have the net scrubbed of all reports such as this one.

    REMEMBER what New Zealand did to stifle reports on the internet in regard to the Mosque murders…………They brought in a law to jaol anyone even looking at alternative reports on the shootings.

    Not a big step for government to ban all future reports on a possible alternative treatment for the virus other than a government mandated infusion of a vaccine into every one’s body.

    Trust government, trust msm and shock jokes? Mad if you do. Have anyone of them publicly stated that there may be already a reported treatment available for the virus which costs, say a dollar a pill, which has been around for decades.

    Nah, they are all awaiting the payoff I suspect…….. especially if a new outbreak appears and the msm can ‘scare the pants off the community’………….which is the globalist modus operandi.

    AS the X22 report notes, people are awakening…………and we have learnt, have we not?

    Since when has a politician (Excluding; ex Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser exposing the deliberate attack by Israel on the USS Liberty in 1967) conceded that government/s kill their own citizens with murderous false flag killing events for centuries to keep control of the public or push for a evil agenda.

    Do not trust the politicians and bureaucrats, they have their separate agendas with the msm running fake dogs at heal.

    Fool us once, shame on them, fool us twice, shame on us …….we are just idiots.

    (Screen shot taken for the censor’s delight)

      • Every doctor has a duty of care towards their patients.
        Liability in any action may depend on common information reasonably available to the doctors at the time of treatment and doctors are also negligent if they do not have common knowledge of effective treatment or they reasonably should have.
        Lawyers, dust of your wigs.
        Time for insurance companies to save suits by informing all their medical practitioner clients of their potential liability.
        No excuse for ignorance and believing sms is no defence.
        Lawyers picnic day soon ahead.
        By the way: this may be deemed As a public information notice to all doctors and insurance companies.
        Should have kept up to date at gumshoenews.con🤣
        🍸🍸🍸🍸🍸🍸
        🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

        • May I also observe
          Relatives of those present victims of the virus might be very interested to be aware that a treatment for their loved ones was likely to be presently existing ( for decades!) and inquire whether they were treated with a likely present ‘cure’. After all Trump told everyone way back
          What say Anglicare medical treating doctors.?
          Seems that some informed and competent legal advice may be warranted.
          Likely litigants, take gumshoe information to your lawyers.
          Do not bother with the msm bs.

          • “REMEMBER what New Zealand did to stifle reports on the internet in regard to the Mosque murders…………They brought in a law to jaol anyone even looking at alternative reports on the shootings.”

            Dear Barrister Ned, with dusted-off wig, the NZ behavior amounts to GK, right? (guilty knowledge).

            Citizens were also forbidden to take photos of the BP oil spill.

            FBI man Richard Deslauriers went on TV to tell Bostonians not to look at any Marathon videos other then the ones he showed or they would be causing a waste of police resources. See Maxwell v Federal Bureau of Investigation et al, filed December 5, 2019 in US District Court.

          • Going back years or so when gumshoe exposed the use of round up in Hyde Park in Sydney Hyde Park.
            In due course Monsanto poison disappeared in the discussions.
            Love it: Bayer bought Monsanto and now Bayer has just been hit with a successful billion dollar liability due to Monsanto.
            Gum shoe was on the money. if only the Bayer gullibles would have read gumshoenews.com, the shareholders of Bayer would be better off.

            Stupid does not follow gumshoe. Doctors and insurance companies should put gumshoe first before all that censored msm shock Joke crap and google censorship.

  4. Some 20 years ago I wrote a letter to the Victorian Government’s Attorney General, enquiring as to whom the Administrative Appeal’s Tribunal was answerable to. The reply was , the government initially elects them, and from the moment of doing so relinquish all government power regarding them, because of this thing called The Separation of Powers. That is all I can offer apart from the fact they all need their arses kicked till their noses bleed. Cheers , Kevin Woodman

  5. Last election we were directed, to the ballot boxes, by CCP personel in plain clothes.
    All these high-rise developments, past ten years, have been to accomodate the communist elite and their servants settling the new China downunder. A similar, but smaller occupation occurred in the nineties, when Jugoslavia collapsed. Many of the corrupt elite, came here and were rewarded handsomely for their experience. The crown and kabal have always ruled Oz. Now they are enhancing their dominance with aid from brother/sisterhoods of communism international.

  6. Regardless of all the agendas that this pandemic has provided the globalists, the underlying fact that SARS-CoV-2 is bioengineered cannot be dismiissed and to deal with COVID-19 as just another “seasonal flu’ will have dire consequences.

    • Thank you, Sandra. Ignoring the fact that autism was deliberately caused — I said deliberately caused — has indeed had dire consequences. Incredibly dire consequences.

      • Interesting that during the recent fiasco whereby rugby league players who didn’t submit to having the flu vaccine would be stood down from the upcoming football season,ex player Matt Rogers who has a child with autism, was rolled out as an authority on autism
        to decree he had researched the subject and found no connection with vaccination.
        “Some doctor(Dr Andrew Wakekefield) lost his job for saying so”.
        Same old same old.
        Everyone will been lining up for the COVID-19 vaccine so life will go back to “normal”!

  7. Nedski offered us a link above to humansarefree.com. In it is a photo of Nelson Rockefeller at Reagan’s table at Bohemian Grove. From the text:

    “Although it’s important to focus on and expose all aspects of dysfunction in our society – including political corruption, mainstream media consolidation and deception, smart meters, GMOs, toxic vaccines, geoengineering, the militarization of police, fake terrorism, false flag ops, UN Agenda 21, transhumanism and the human microchipping agenda – in order to transform and heal them, it’s crucial to realize that, at a fundamental level, they are all connected.

    “All these issues and more are manifestations of a more primordial evil or unconsciousness in our midst – Satanic black magic. The secretive rituals conducted at Bohemian Grove and elite mansions tell us more about who rules the world than political think tanks or banking cartels, although of course there is an overlap.”

    Go it.

    • When are you going to wake up to the fact that the secretive ritual/Bohemian Grove/ elite mansion mantra is just a cheap & nasty form of entertainment/distraction from what’s going on within one’s own family/neighbourhood ?

      The focus should be on defending what one still has, as opposed to trying to win back what’s already been stolen or, worse still, trying to commandeer something that was never within one’s control in the first place

      • Berry, if you care to say (but it might not be advisable to), how are you planning to defend what you still have — e.g., bodily integrity– when 4 soldiers march into your living room to chip you –the chip being reportedly located in the COVID-19 “test”?

        Or, if they take you off to prison, how would you defend yourself once there? I think about these things a lot.

        When visiting someone in a mental ward recently, I was amazed to see how imprisoned he is. They “own” him. As far as I could tell, the nurses are nice to him, but how could even a mentally well person stay stable in that situation?

        • As the vax agenda has, and continues to be, rolled out purely on the basis of social exclusion the“4 soldiers marching into your living room/prison/mental ward” rumours are naught but fear-mongering and the source is dead obvious: Better to turn your energy towards consolidating forces with fellow outcasts

          • A strong defence can thereby be mounted against any potential attack and the onus of proof reversed accordingly

          • Berry, Dr. Day’s 1969 speech says that hospitals will become usable to imprison, and he was amazingly right on most of his predictions.

            However, I was not driving at that particular when I mentioned my pal in the mental ward. I had in my mind the strangeness of the Lockdown. People are currently not running their lives in their usual way (with the possible exception of Berry!)

            If it goes on for long, the new normal will change the citizen’s psyche. After a while most prisoners get Stockholm syndrome and I’m sure I would get it in a matter of weeks.

  8. I said in the article that I would not get nitty-gritty about prosecutions, just wanted to cover “structure.” However, I now add this item from the United States Code (of federal criminal law). Later in the series we can play with it:

    18 USC 175: “Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, or attempts, threatens, or conspires to do the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section committed by or against a national of the United States.”

  9. Looking on the optimistic side
    I think with the “vaccine military roll out” Trump is just setting up Fauci
    Later on when there is no vaccine Trump will say “Fauci told me” and then he will get the sack.
    Trump can’t sack people for nothing I should think, there has to be some “approved” reason
    Otherwise they would just be going down like flies

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.