Home Trump Plausible Deniability, Concocted Deceptions, and The Enemy Within

Plausible Deniability, Concocted Deceptions, and The Enemy Within

4
Peter Strzok faces questions (adapted photo from Evan Vucci and CSPAN)

by G5

There are interesting parallels between the Congressional Hearings of DC Swamp Dwellers from 2016 to the present, and those of Mafia characters following the Valachi Hearings of 1963 — from bribing, blackmailing and owning the alleged ‘Authority’ and the alleged upholders of Law and Order.

The Old Wild West were safer eras. At least at that time you could dispense with the enemy (individually or by civil uprising) — before what evolved as The State protecting The Enemy of The People under the guise of ‘Protecting The People’. 

In days of better minds and moral hearts, of understanding the evil natures of the few becoming the empowered, Constitutions were written as an enforceable contract between The People and those who would posture a power over them.

Deep State or The Swamp, is not some simple aberration, anomaly or unusual occurrence of circumstances. It is what has always occurred. Nothing has changed: the cloaks, plausible deniability, and massive rolling, concocted deceptions.

The Swamp Dwellers

Peter Strzok is a more significant character in the current American disaster than is presently realized. He ‘Owns’ and ‘Controls’ The DOJ-FBI, since he was positioned there in 1996. His wife (Hodgman) is a director of the SEC and his brother is a Jesuit.

Publicly perceived positions or rankings are immaterial. Trump correctly represents the American People — despite the ad nauseam noise factories and diversions. But he does not control the US Military or the US Intel Machine.

Trump’s personal life or past activities are not relevant. But those of characters as: Ma and Pa Clinton, The Obama ‘Truman’ Show, and Strzok et al, are specifically relevant.

As Hoover controlled the FBI and therefore America from May 1924 to May 1972 (appointed by LBJ through clenched teeth, as Direct For Life), and as GHWB performed the same task through JFK to 9/11, Strzok runs America.

Past Presidents Owned

Hoover owned and blackmailed eight Presidents, as well as DC Congressional bench warmers. He in turn was owned and controlled by the Mafia — which existence he denied (a common scenario for those in ‘Power’) — until his hand was forced by the power grab of the Jewish Mafia over the Italian. This commenced with the 14 November 1957 Apalachin Affair, through the nauseating theatrics of trials leading nowhere (1958-9), to the 1963 Valachi Hearings.

Even Obama’s socio-economic devastation of America is yet to be understood by the herds. (Foreign debt doubled in 8 years; destroyed the remnants of a medical system; monumental crime statistics; horrendous abuse of power.) The vast majority will never be able to comprehend the realities — being far overshadowed by the Wilson White House.

Wilson enslaved the American People — and from there the World — by The Federal Reserve. He destroyed economic activity by the IRS 16th Amendment confiscation of capital and disguised metadata grab. And began the entrenchment of government power through fiefdoms as that of J.Edgar Hoover, leading to actors as Strzok.

The real histories and activities of Hoover and Strzok are remarkaby similar. Even to the point of Hoover’s manipulation of the 1917 Espionage Act paralleling Strzok’s manipulation of The FISA Court. Which indeed should never have existed in any legitimate Free Society.

Comey was brought in to ‘front’ the FBI. Why would he leave a directorship of HSBC and a ‘Consultancy’ to LockMart (The FA35 Affair), that was returning over USD 11 million a year? Because he is a believer in truth and justice?

Other Swamps

Ruth Kelly, went from the Bank of England, to Westminster, to an MD of HSBC — after a bout of Hand-in-The-Till as a British Minister of The Crown. On her ridiculous journey through she allowed convicted pedophiles to become school teachers. Well, we can’t have discrimination can we?

Robert Fellowes, Diana’s brother-in-law, went from Private Secretary to The Sovereign, to Chairman of Barclays — after the Diana Paris Incident and a refusal to allow her body to be returned to England. (Fayed’s peasant ignorance and stupidity had him incorrectly focus and fixate.)

And of course Australia’s Gillard was ’employed’ by The Brookings Institute.

An Australian Prime Minister pedophile was never investigated, as Britain’s Heath was put aside — not only for what he did to children, but for what he did to the sovereignty of the entire nation.

Congressional Hearings

The following videos are interesting in as much as they further confirm the current state of American Swamp. They are variations of the same theme, from: Lerner, Koskinen, Clinton, Lynch, McCabe, Rosenstein, Comey, and the rest of the mountain of the proverbial that were lying under oath (or were: economical with the truth, confined by ongoing investigations, not their responsibility, can’t remember, will need to take the question on notice, a matter of national security, will answer in a non-public setting, subpoenaed — but arguing the definition, unable to answer due to possible self-incrimination, unable to find the documents requested, unable to comply due to legal advice, etc.)

In the first few videos, there are: No Points of Order, there are No Parliamentary Questions at issue, there is No harassment of the witness, the witness was Not prevented from answering, motions to adjourn were ridiculous.

What was made abundantly clear was those who are ‘Owned’ and Controlled by Strzok through Blackmail. There are no ideological variances at issue. The Swamp is Not representative of The People.

For or Against The People

Goodlatte, Gohmert, Jordan, Gowdy, et al, represent The American People.

Characters as Jerrold Nadler — The Ranking Member (Dem) sitting on the US House Committee on The Judiciary, to the side of Goodlatte, is the prime noise, obstruction, and interference element in that joint committee hearing, questioning the grand weasel, Strzok. A very great deal more was revealed by the disruptions, than any allegedly answered questions.

Nadler, with his disreputable face on the desk, obstructed the impeachments of GWB and Cheney, delayed that of Bill Clinton (allowing Clinton to run, at the end of his term), and supported the Soros funded ‘Occupy’ Movement. But he is a driving element to remove Trump.

How could a Democrat act as an agent for right wing interests? How could treasonous Republican McCain (code: Songbird) act against right wing interests (McCain’s version of his Vietnam capture, is a lie). The answer is: there is NO Right-Left (ideological) Paradigm. There never was. It’s a long running illusion sucked in mercilessly by the herds. 

The last two clips are without the obstructionists, and are further revealing.

Michael Horowitz as DOJ-FBI Inspector General, delivered the ‘Official’ answers to that which we already knew. He spent a year with 500 staff and USD100 million to deliver the obvious, for the citation addicted. But as the Chilcot Report, it goes nowhere. (Side note: Blair remains the highest paid speaking liar of the contemporary era. He became unelected President of the EU, and UN Mid-East Envoy.)

The videos are here, here, here, here, here, here, and here:

 

SHARE

4 COMMENTS

  1. Jordon is making a good point upon a president who has sympathy for what has and is somewhat either subversive countries or countries that are not considered democratic countries or are despot governing powers such as North Korea, if Trump is invoved with personel busines dealings with say Putin and Russia is not clear about interference with democratic elections as a deal with Trump, or Trump is involved with spurious claims of progress with North Korea, to hide his incompetence and attempting to dog whistle on his own incompetence as President of America, he is attempting to fool most of the people but discerning individuals can see this buffoon more suited to entertaiment on American TV and buying golf courses to pass time to avoid any introspection of his lost self and dilemma of being relatively redundant as human being guiding a culture in the main now having lost its way.

  2. I’ve been watching American politics for 30 odd years and during that time I have never really been able to work out the difference between the two political parties there.

    Both parties IMO are on the same side of the fence on many occasions with the exception of the last 10 years or so. The only problem is that on so many times I’ve not been real sure which side of the fence it is.

    Funny how all this “Russian interference” only started after Clinton lost the election last year and how very disappointing it is to see so many Americans believe it.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.