by Mary W Maxwell, LLB
We know of an adult, in South Australia, now in her 40s who has medical proof that the sexual abuse she endured as a child included being cut in the rectum by a curved knife. Needless to say, the only person who should be wielding a knife inside the human body is a trained surgeon. In her case, the wielder was a pedophile who engaged in his violent perversions over many years. He hurt numerous children.
Bleeding rectum is one of the subjects covered in The Family Court Survey that Dee McLachlan conducted in 2018. Here is Item 49 of the questionnaire’s 55 items:
“(Sorry to ask) What abuse do you believe occurred — or was disclosed in some way?”
Of the 79 questionnaires received, 64 persons answered that question. It was a multiple-choice item in which the responder was invited to tick as many boxes as he or she wished.
The following answers came in. I will list them in descending order according to number of ticks:
Touching, Fiddling (38)
Injuries, scars (29)
Rashes, swelling, other medical issues (26)
Penetration (18)
“Doodle vomit” (13)
Photographic or video sessions (camera flashes) (12)
Bleeding rectum etc (9)
Descriptions of sex toys (7)
Rituals (7)
They don’t want to say (7 kids)
Urolagnia (urinating on someone), other fetishes (6)
“Milking the cow” (2)
Also, 39 people ticked the box “Other”
Dee McLachlan’s 2018 Family Court Survey
The questionnaire was available to participate in, online, from October to December 2018. Seventy-nine replies came in.
On January 2, 2019, McLachlan published the full results of the survey in a GumshoeNews article. As her opening statement to that article, Dee said:
“Let me anticipate a criticism of the survey – namely, that the manner in which parents were recruited to fill out the questionnaire was not scientific. That is true. I posted the questionnaire on the Internet and anyone who wished to answer it could do so (a free version through Surveyhero).
The questionnaire was posted on GumshoeNews.com, of which I am the editor. We had already published negative critiques of Australia’s Family Court. So it is likely that the word got passed around to parents who had had a bad experience with the Court. … I ask that you interpret it as a survey of dissatisfied parents. (E.g., like those thousands of victims who presented to the Royal Commission about child abuse.)
So what value does it have? Is it merely a whinge? No. As you will see, the particular answers to my questions are enlightening, and often surprising, in showing which groups of people tend to believe a child’s allegations, which groups have a history of suppressing evidence, and so forth. It clearly reveal patterns.”
For this article, I [Mary Maxwell] choose only 10 of the 55 items to display. I chose ones that most vividly show that “judicial kidnap” is happening in Australia. My definition of judicial kidnap is: court-ordered removal of a child from a Protective parent when there has been an allegation of sexual abuse by the other parent.
Each of the 10 items is expressed as a percentage. That figure was obtained by using the number of people who ticked the relevant box, in proportion to the total number of responders, 79.
- 73% say the abuser did not get prosecuted.
- 63% say the police refused to act, “as the case is before Family Court.”
- 57% say that the reported abuse was not investigated.
- 53% say “The Court prevented me from seeking medical or psychological help.”
- 53% say “I believe someone in authority coached the child to say that the abuse did not”
- 50% say the judge ordered child to live with the abuser.
- 40% [of responders] say that their child speaks of suicide.
- 30% say the child is in fear of his/her life.
- 26% say “I have physical proof [such as emails] that evidence was falsified.”
- 11% say the child “had a bleeding rectum, etc”.
In this article I am not spending any ink on the parents’ report that they were called “delusional” for reporting sexual abuse — or that they were outrageously accused of having a mental problem known as Parental Alienation Syndrome. I think that is well-established and non-controversial.
I also omitted their financial suffering. Forty percent said they lost home ownership thanks to the cost of fighting for their child. An amazing number, 63%, said they have lost all or partial support of family or friends over these matters.
My interest in discussing McLachlan’s survey is not in proving the parent’s ordeal. It is in showing the malice of the judge. Is it the fault of judges that so many kids speak of suicide? Can it be blamed on the judge that the police give the parent a deceitful line about police’s inability to act if the case is before the court?
Maybe the judge did not directly “order” those two things – the suicide notion and the unavailability of police assistance — but the judge is in charge. The judge condones a system in which clearly a pedophile parent is given an easy row to hoe, and the Protective parent is tormented.
But most critically the judge gives orders that ruin a child’s life.
When a judge wants to see to it that no prosecution of the abuser takes place he/she will see to that.
If a judge wants to hold the line against the parent being able to escort the kid to a doctor (which would generate more reports of abuse), he/she will hold that line.
Dee McLachlan did not think to ask the question “Did a judge order that you will not see your child again?” but we do know from persons we have since interviewed (in SA, Qld and NSW) that some judges have ordered that.
McLachlan’s survey also indicates that crimes have been committed along the lines of cheating the court, especially by lies, by falsification of documents, and by the concealing of evidence. But here I am not interested in that. Such “corruption of the judiciary” can take place in any type of case, not just ones related to child kidnap.
Bleeding Rectum Syndrome
I am interested in child kidnap. Let me isolate one answer to the survey’s Question 49, for which 11% ticked the box. They said the kid had a bleeding rectum. What I am interested in is the mind of a judge who would transfer a child with a bleeding rectum to the custody of the person who is making that rectum bleed.
It does seem that it would be very abnormal for either a male judge or a female judge to consign a youngster to such a fate. We are human beings. Aren’t we?
To emphasize the abnormality of what is going on, I hereby recommend a new psychiatric diagnosis for those Family Court (or Childrens Court) judges who have knowingly sent to an abuser a little boy or girl for whom there was, on file, a record of a bleeding rectum. I will say that such a judge has got BRS – Bleeding Rectum Syndrome.
That’s the diagnosis of the judge, not the child – the judge’s mental illness consists of his/her condoning the abuse. Yes, I do intend a pun on “Parental Alienation Syndrome” – PAS – a diagnosis that has been used against thousands of parents.
We’ve got a sick, sick system here. The time has come to put a stop to it, whatever that takes.
As far as I can deduce, the system is run by thugs who get the judges to underwrite the sex-trafficking of kids. We have got to stop being so “considerate” of those thugs, and the obeisant judges, and also stop being so hands-offish about them. They are in want of prosecution.
The person ultimately responsible is you. And me. And your neighbor. We can’t ask a mentally ill judge to clean it up. It has gone on – with no abatement and certainly no punishment — for a few decades. It is never going to just correct itself.
What sort of sicko’s would perform such a torture that would cause rectum bleeding, especially with a tool such as a knife.? However any judge who would allow such action to continue must be even sicker. Both cases sounds like sacrificial malice.
All dots connected.
Everyone please read this article–from beginning to end and connect your dots to the big picture of the state of affairs today–The Tavistock Agenda fait accompli
http://bibliotecapleyades.lege.net/biggestsecret/biggestsecretbook/biggestsecret16.htm
re: anal penetration
“This condition has become known as Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD) or Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). The latter is more accurate because the compartments are not ‘personalities’ as such, they are fragments of mind which have disassociated, become detached from, the rest of the consciousness. It is like moving a radio dial across the stations, the compartments, tuning into one and then another. Even this technique is primitive compared with the latest methods. I knew from my research that there is an obsession among Satanists and paedophiles with having anal sex with young girls, as well as boys, and the British therapist, Vera Diamond, told me that this is a way of creating multiples.
Anal penetration is so painful to a child that it sends a surge of energy up the spine which explodes in the brain, causing further ‘personality’ splitting. It is called vaso-vagal shock. She showed me a painting by a female victim of this and it portrayed a surge of white energy rising from the bottom of the spine and exploding in all directions in her head. So even anal sex has an ulterior motive for those who understand its mental and emotional effect. “
Another brilliant and perfectly timed article Mary.
I have been researching paedophile groups and the injuries they inflict on their victims for a while now.
What I have discovered is that certain paedophile groups utilise signature tactics to traumatise the children they assault.
One such torture tactic used on myself and other victims of my father was severing of the cutaneous nerve, inside the rectum, with a sharp, curved blade knife.
My father inflicted this on myself when I was only just out of nappies. I was about 30 months old. The injury caused severe bleeding and other issues.
I’ve never got over the emotional trauma that my father’s infliction of this injury caused me. This is partly why I gave testimony about it in my ITNJ statement.
I also gave testimony about this injury because I know it is not uncommon amongst victims of child sex abusers.
It is my opinion that the Edwardstown paedophiles (my father’s group of mates) have been utilising this trauma tactic for decades.
Many of ‘the Family’ victims suffered severe anal injuries.
There is a clear pattern here for law makers and enforcers to follow up on. But they do nothing.
I want to live in a world where it is never allowed to happen again. Let alone apparently being condoned by the judges who preside over such issues, and who are employed to protect children from such acts.
I copied a few sentences out of Diane’s link above. The author here is Cathy O’Brien. I feel that most of her stuff is accurate but i also think she is still under control.
So I hold back a bit — while Brice Taylor seems to me to have written her book freely (“Thanks for the memories.”).
This is Cathy O’Brien talking, in Diane’s link:
“Clinton pushed his way out from under me and told Bush while he glanced around for the camera: “You didn’t need to do that. I’m with you anyway. My position does not need to be compromised.”
“Clinton was apparently referring to the blackmail tactics amongst the Order of the Rose elite. World leaders were always compromised through covertly filmed bizarre sexual activity as was my experience at the Bohemian Grove.
Lest anyone think that similar tactics are not used in Australia, i am familiar with a public company doing the same to it’s executives and board members in the 1970- early 1980’s.
Yep, the company was dealing in the transport of drugs, gold, money laundering etc.
The BOSS was outwardly socially respectable and managed a Queen’s gong.
There is a sick lot at the big end of town…… the big end includes many wannabeeeeees.
Dear Readers, This week I came into possession of a most excellent book. The title is “The Worst Interests of the Child. ” The author is Keith Snow. The value of it is that he digs and digs to find out what the judges and attorneys and doctors are getting up to.
Most of the action is in Connecticut around 2013, but the court capers are identical to Australia.
I am almost lost for words after reading all this and the relevant comments.
Where are our political representatives, lawyers, shock jokes, msm editors, journalists and what about the millions spent on the Royal Commission that did not even have a commission to take evidence on this evil.
And what about we the public ignoring reports of this travesty and cruelty?
I will be happy to leave this miserable planet in due course.I am reminded of a film I viewed decades ago with Sydney Pointier ( sp? ) . From recollection he was a character and observer from another planet and looked/lived around/in our society.
In one scene, paraphrasing, he observed;
“This planet is rotten to the core filled with maggots trying to leap into the universe’.
At the time I was shocked. Now I know it was a valid observation.
If alien words exist it is understandable that they would have no truck with maggots…..those running this planet and their running dogs.
The core, i think was within an apple.
Any assistance in finding the film or title would be appreciated. I wish to see it again,
I have searched and cannot find it. All but.
Sidney turned 92 in Feb 2019.
The best I recall was ‘the Beford Incident’ with Richard Whit/f
ord/mark ? and ‘in the heat of the night’.
Some book burning around?
I took at a look at Pointier’s movies, perhaps it is the movie ‘Brother John’.
Thanks Terry, from the reviews it seems to fit and I think it is, but hard to find!!!!
Wonder why it received some bad reviews ………. maggots at work?
AN ALERT:
I too Ned am at a loss for words.
I had no idea what to expect when I published the first Family Court article. I did not expect to have so many calls and emails with so much pain and grief… and CRIMINALITY.
S 121 has gagged these stories for a long time. So I want to alert the authorities reading this material. You may be upset with Gumshoe for writing about these accounts. You might feel outraged that we are exposing these stories.
But I can assure you — I have been reserved and patient. On my desk are a 100 of these accounts — much worse than what we have published. The details are harrowing. We have but published I’d say 3 – 5% of the accounts at hand. And these have been somewhat “palatable” translations of the trauma.
I have honestly thought, what has gone wrong here. How could the system find “the worst possible outcome” for so many people. I hear it over and over. Now I am not referring to the usual cases… custody and the like. It is when the child and abuse comes into the equation. And they are simply not believed in most of the cases sent to me.
But as I said… we have published maybe 3 – 5%. But what now? And the system is designed to not help — but the law requires all of us to do the right thing.
As I said Ned, I am for the moment — just for the moment — at a loss for words. And I pray for those in authority to please start doing the right thing.
Section 121 of the Family Law Act is just the tip of the iceberg as far as silencing victims (protective parents and children) within the Family Law system. It also is a system that operates without transparency and in the dark. For example – not all judgments are published, court hearing with Registrars and Extempore decisions are not recorded. We have only one company that has the monopoly in regards to the recordings so Hearings that are recorded are available at a large sum of money. Even when children become adults they are not allowed to openly disclose the mishaps that occurred to them as a direct result of the family law system.
Thank you, Ned. Now here is a beauty. Judge signs “generic” orders for social worker to grab kids.
https://reason.com/2019/05/09/kentucky-cabinet-family-health-child-services-judges-pre-signed/
Blame the knife-wielder?
I say blame the judge who says to the Knife-wielder “Oh, so that’s what you do. Here, you can have the boy (or girl). Enjoy!”
ALWAYS BLAME THE JUDGE. No matter how many others are to blame, always blame the one whose signature wrecks this kid’s future. ALWAYS.
Not to mention that the judge is an aider and abettor of major crime. Maybe when she (most Family Court judges are female) gets to jail, the other female prisoners will deal with her appropriately.
This might not seem relevant , but maybe the core of the problems we face today .
We have to stand up and expose the beast system for what it is .
Australia was a crown colony that has been handed over to the global CCP .
It did not happen overnight , the plan has been many decades in practise .
The start was around the supposed fall of communism in Eastern Europe in the late eighties
and early nineties . Many top 10% , of those regimes . came to the “west “ . Because they had
been groomed in snooping and survelliance , were placed in influential positions in security throughout the five eye nations network . These people are not compassionate , they are compromised thugs sadists perverts pedophiles etc . in camouflage . We had them here before
but now their kind has grown massively . The star pupils of the pagan beast system came here
by stealth and have been rewarded accordingly . All our skills and knowledge were transfers
to China and elsewhere and we became a banana state at the mercy of the banksters .
The roles have been reversed east has become west . Perversion abounds and heart humour
and humility has been trampled and banished .
Thank you, 56. If you can be more specific, please do. I am aware of Chinese demographics but not aware that west and east somehow switched roles.
I always worry when I hear that the actions of a few are considered to have been the actions of a great number. (I apply this worry to both bad things and good things.)
Granted, we can generalize when a lot of ordinary folks seem to do the same thing — “The Poles hate the Russians,” ” The Australians are protective of the environment.” “Females are gossipers.”
But when it’s a policy decision taken by a few smarties behind closed doors, it just cannot be ascribed to a nation. You say Australia was handed over to “the global CCP.” Is that a real entity? How did the CPP present themselves to the ones who could thus hand Australia over?
I still haven’t got my head around the sale of the port of Darwin. I think Dee’s articles have shown that there are indeed traitors in the Oz government who sell us out regularly.
56, I wish this article’s comments could be devoted to the child-knifers. You say:
“Many top 10% , of those regimes came to the “west.” Because they had been groomed in snooping and surveilliance, were placed in influential positions in security throughout the five eye nations network . These people are not compassionate, they are compromised thugs, sadists perverts pedophiles etc in camouflage. We had them here before but now their kind has grown massively. The star pupils of the pagan beast system came here…”
I have blamed the judges. Are you blaming the Chinese? Let me ask: if there had never been a China on this Earth, would there now be less of a child-knifing problem?
Mary ,
I do not blame the Chinese , or any other nations , for the actions of the few that become influential by whatever means . The common people are generally good no matter where they come from . We are all coming from the same source . It’s the temptations that divide us .
I came from a village of a thousand people .
The shades of good and evil are as many as there are inhabitants . We are all sinners . The depth of our sins is another matter .