Home Corona Reflections on Vaccines From Slovakia

Reflections on Vaccines From Slovakia

11

A look back at vaccines and circumstances

by Ivan Hecko

Our “statutory“ media remind me of the German term  “gleichschaltung“ – which should describe the unlawful situation in Germany between the years 1933 – 1945. We had a similar – though maybe less aggressive – period in our history, called communism. Today it is said to be different: we have access to media in other languages presenting other opinions. But we still have an assessment of the people according to their political stances, even in matters that have nothing to do with politics.

At the same time, we know how much damage this caused in some periods of our history – especially during the so-called communist regime – and not only social damage – the installation of incompetent politically supported people. It caused – and still does today – damage. Here and there some politician is surprised that he has lost his position and “doesn’t know what could be the reason”.

In this context, one more observation: More and more, a transnational political power is interfering in the political affairs of our state – and that means internal. And that brings us even back to communist times. We are staffed and commanded by “comrades from headquarters”. But they are “sustained” by the political headquarters in the event of any violation of the law. That is, practically the exact same thing in a different color.

In order to stop theorizing in general, I will move on to a relatively recent case of COVID – Vaccines, in which people were forced to vaccinate for a long time and by various forms of blackmail – in violation of the applicable laws. And none of the “responsible” have tried to comment on it yet — it remains “taboo”. At the same time, the consequences are significantly negative in most countries and represent a clear confirmation of the wrongdoings of state apparatuses, especially of the institution called WHO – World Health Organization. So, in retrospect:

1- In a US Army laboratory in Winnipeg, Canada, an artificial virus was produced that was – then or later – christened COVID. This one was released on the people during the “friendly armies action” in Wu Han, China. Considering how quickly it spread, it must have been released everywhere else as well.

2- Against the virus – 100% non-standard – a “vaccine” began to be developed. Vaccines are never made against influenza, because the development of a vaccine takes years – at least about 6 years, normally (more than 10), so it is pointless because the flu does not last that long, it is estimated at most, e.g. a year and a half. That nonsense has been reinforced by massive propaganda and essentially violent actions to push vaccination against the law because:

3- The vaccine was created in violation of the Oviedo Convention, it interferes with the human mRNA level, plus

4- It was not developed in an adequate way and was practically not tested (according to the regulations at all!!).

5- It has been shown to disrupt barriers in the human brain, plus

6- It was deployed as mandatory!! This is in violation of several laws, regardless of the specific country. It represented a violation of the Oviedo Convention and the Nuremberg Laws. And also the applicable laws of probably all EU countries, because it was actually deployed without adequate testing.

7- States retroactively try to “extricate themselves” from the problem by paying compensation. But the “vaccine” remains in people’s bodies for a long time, and not only simply kills a person, but also devastates the organism gradually, often killing people during physical exertion, e.g. athletes.

So as a summary:  The virus was produced in a US state laboratory. The “vaccine” was produced by Pharma companies. The owners of the shares of Pharma companies became immensely rich on the whole “Project”. According to statistics in some countries – difficult to verify – the “project” killed more people with vaccines than with the virus. I am not aware of anyone publishing aggregate statistics. There are millions of people around the world who have that vaccine in them and have permanent consequences. I am not aware of anyone being punished either, although there are plenty of reasons to do so:

  • A man-made virus was unleashed on humans,
  • A vaccine was created against it, which is in multiple contradictions with current laws,
  • The vaccine was deployed in massive violation of other applicable laws,
  • A lot of people died from the artificial virus,
  • Lots of people have died from the “vaccine”.

Measures? One would expect that some exist after the events described above, mostly illegal(!). But I have not noticed anything. However, this can turn out differently through indirect consequences: We, as a country, have long-term successful vaccinations against various dangerous diseases. By deploying – partly mandatory – vaccines that were “against nothing”, as they did not contain any sample of the virus against which antibodies should be created, and on the contrary caused serious problems for many – we created a negative precedent of “quasi-vaccination”, unheard of in our country. This can have serious consequences when we attempt another real vaccination.

So I should try wrap it up somehow.  But I can’t actually do that, that should be done by someone from the “mafia” who organized the whole “earning event for the rich combined with a reduction in the number of people”. That is, the participants of “Event 201″, in the original ” Event 201 “. The front page lists “Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health”, “Center for Health Security”, Bill and Melinda Gates. They are quiet. And those who implemented the “vaccination” program here are also silent.

And finally, one more fact that few people are aware of: During the above-mentioned “events”, we often “listened” – even if sometimes indirectly – to people who were “not elected by anyone”. Within our state, only a person to whom someone gives the right to do so can give us orders, or a person positioned above, and somewhere that sequence ends with a person whose authority comes from an election.

But vaccination with a killer vaccine (according to statistics) was ordered by the WHO. At the same time, it was based on lies regarding both the danger from the COVID virus and the so-called “safety” of vaccines. And all kinds of so-called NGOs – non-governmental organizations. That is, they were involved in coercive processes at different levels – “institutions and individuals who were not elected by anyone”.  And we have to guard that from now on, only those who will then be responsible for it, or experts in the relevant positions, can make decisions. So far, I am registering only one change of a responsible person – the director of WHO to be replaced. I do not consider this to be sufficient. And from now on, the interference of “people not elected by anyone” in decision-making processes must be carefully monitored.  Those making decisions must be responsible for the consequences. Especially, when the decisions – directly/indirectly – concern the people.

SHARE

11 COMMENTS

  1. “And from now on, the interference of ‘people not elected by anyone’ in decision-making processes must be carefully monitored.”

    Bravissimo.

  2. Ivan,
    It is truly tragic how power corrupts absolutely. Place of birth, a little south from you, was also shackled by communism for half a century. After a war of cleansing, it seemed independence had arrived, only to witness totalitarian agenda with the euro $ enforced there now. The children of Tito’s bs are still in power. It’s all about who’s your dad, and what skool did you go to. Father was a carpenter, me too. His dad an official, so is the son or daughter. Movie stars play the game, through a revolving door, nomenklatura entrenched from generation to generation. That’s why war is good for business. Maybe, if every child is introduced to musical instruments and singing, instead of video games and politicks that only kill, our world will be different.
    Bombing schools universities hospitals churches and residential dwellings, because there are terrorists in basements doesn’t make sense now or ever, it’s just bs for genocide.

  3. I guess I’m homesick. Got this from nzherald.co. (“how to lose at the Cup”):

    At least consider the favourite. I never pick the favourite because I consider it being the “easy” option. But a favourite horse has won the Melbourne Cup 32 times out of 163 races – that’s 19.6 per cent of the time. I’d take one win every five years over none in 21 years… and we’ve had just one favourite that has won in the last 19 years. We’re due for a favourite to win.

  4. Dee, I hit “send” but it disappeared. Plus a lot of funny things have been happening to me lately.

    Try again, got this from NZherald.co

    “I never pick the favourite because I consider it being the ‘easy’ option. But a favourite horse has won the Melbourne Cup 32 times out of 163 races – that’s 19.6 per cent of the time. I’d take one win every five years over none in 21 years… and we’ve had just one favourite that has won in the last 19 years. We’re due for a favourite to win.”

  5. “Our “statutory“ media remind me of the German term “gleichschaltung“ – which should describe the unlawful situation in Germany between the years 1933 – 1945.”

    Who does the writer blame for the ‘unlawful situation’?

    Germany had every right to defend itself.

    Hitler did not want war –

    The Jewish Declaration
    Of War On Germany
    The Economic Boycott of 1933

    Few people know the facts about the singular event that helped spark what ultimately became known as World War II – the international Jewish declaration of war on Germany shortly after Adolf Hitler came to power and well before any official German government sanctions or reprisals against Jews were carried out. The March 24, 1933 issue of The Daily Express of London (shown above) described how Jewish leaders, in combination with powerful international Jewish financial interests, had launched a boycott of Germany for the express purpose of crippling her already precarious economy in the hope of bringing down the new Hitler regime. It was only then that Germany struck back in response. Thus, if truth be told, it was the worldwide Jewish leadership – not the Third Reich – that effectively fired the first shot in the Second World War. Prominent New York attorney Samuel Untermyer (above right) was one of the leading agitators in the war against Germany, describing the Jewish campaign as nothing less than a “holy war.”……………

    https://rense.com/general84/declare.htm

    • Jane Halton was Australia’s ambassador to Event 21 or Event 201 however it’s called, she got a few government positions and her in-law Brett Sutton performed the criminal acts under the criminal regime of Daniel Andrews who is the first leader in Australian history to shoot his own citizens with rubber bullets, as far as I’m aware, unless Sir Joh did it too. Her in-law Brett Sutton has moved on to CSIRO presumably to further his expertise in foisting fake pandemic measures on the population and enforce bullshit injections on everyone aged over 5. So Jane Halton has also been rewarded with a seat on the board of ANZ bank. So far they are both sitting pretty on salaries of probably $500k or more.
      This is what happens when your country is overrun by mafia, which is basically what the red party is, and more than half of the blue party too. Include green and teal and we have an overwhelming majority of misguided and psychopaths, however there is a way out, we could return to an era of responsibility by paying tax only to state governments and Canberra should go begging to them. This would see tax driven down as premiers fought to get the best deal. It is a great error to fund Canberra and it’s denizens and the proof is very simple, it is probably the richest city in Australia with the most prostitutes.
      As for your hated jews, Halton is an English name, as is Sutton and Andrews.

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.