by Dee McLachlan
You might wonder — how long does it take to destroy two lives? Not very long — about two hours on a computer.
This article is about a certain female police officer, whom I will call Officer Demeter (not her real name), and how she brought disgrace upon the South Australian Police, known as SAPOL.
It took me many months of dealing with a mother-child issue in SA to discover the extent of the arbitrary power allotted to this officer, and how she misused that power. The following account begins a while back, and to comprehend her actions, one needs to understand how she became involved.
Three years ago social workers and investigators from CPS (Child Protection Service) and the DCP (Department for Child Protection, formerly FamiliesSA) did the right thing. They listened to a 6-year-old and determined that she was a very reliable witness. As a result they decided to have the dad arrested for sexual abuse and exploitation.
Owing to some questionable circumstances, the father’s arrest was “delayed.” He did not land up in the clink. Still, a detailed investigation followed and it was determined that he did sexually abuse his daughter. That is known as substantiation of an allegation, in CPS parlance.
Father Points Blame at Mother
However, the father had accused the mother of being delusional and psychotic — even though the mother was not the notifier, a relative was. (The notifier is the person that makes the report to crisis care.) So as part of the investigation, CPS investigated the mother’s medical history, and sent her to undergo a mental health “assessment” by a forensic psychiatrist to determine whether she might be the cause of the child’s problem.
This mum was given a clean bill of mental health, and was also cleared of “coaching.” Both parents were sent a letter in which the authorities summed up the situation. They said (in so many words) that the father was an abuser, and the mum was a sane protector (establishing also that the mum had been emotionally abused by the father when he was her partner).
If you have been reading Gumshoe articles for the last 10 months or so, you know what an abuser does next. He quickly files for custody in Family Court. It is a well-known and standard tactic to avoid prosecution. This father did that and, going against the department’s findings, he also submitted a so-called NOR – a Notice of Risk — to say that the child was in danger from her mother, as she was suffering delusions and psychosis. A second forensic psychiatric assessment proved that wrong — again.
Over a year goes by as mother and daughter live happily together at home.
As part of her preparation for the Family Court challenge, the mother had entered in, for testing, some blood-stained and possibly semen-stained child’s clothing. The police went through their processes to determine whether it should be tested. The DCP advised testing, as the father had been red-flagged, so off the clothing went — to CIB in central Adelaide.
After some weeks the mother phoned, wondering what the results were, believing the evidence was crucial to her case. She was told that the items had not been tested, and were no longer scheduled to be tested. Someone from a branch police station had come to pick them up.
Enter Officer Demeter
Several weeks later, Officer Demeter called the mother, advising her that the items had been “lost in the system” but she had found them, and that they didn’t know who they belonged to, as there was “no name or statement” attached.
With the court date looming, the clothing was no longer in line to be tested — despite the police once believing there was enough cause for concern. Officer Demeter claimed she was now “in charge,” and advised the mum that there was no reason to test the clothes unless her child could give good reason! So the mum agreed for her child to be interviewed.
Officer Demeter dilly-dallied for weeks. Finally, only days before the start of trial, she interviewed the child (but without the department present). It was too late for anything to be tested though.
“She’s Been So Brave” and “Heavy Things”
At the interview the child disclosed many terrible things including that she was made available for “others” to abuse. To talk about these things was traumatic for the child, and after the interview, Demeter gave the kid a toy and said “she’s been so brave” and had spoken about some “heavy things.”
That evening, Officer Demeter called the mother and relayed some of the details. For the mother it was shocking and sad to learn of new abuses she had not previously known. (The child never wanted to tell her mum what she had said in the interview, even though the officer had said she could.)
Now, I won’t describe the abuse in detail — believe me, it is raw, and cruel.
But alas, despite the egregious nature of the abuse, nothing was done. Why? Because good ‘ol Officer Demeter said the eight-year-old could not “time and date” her abuse. This is absurd as there are ways to determine that something happened whether or not the date is knowable — so nothing was done.
I still question why the department was not involved with the interview, and why the officer did nothing to provide Family Court with any of this critical knowledge.
Even so, the Family Court awarded sole parental responsibility to the mum, but ordered the child to have what is called “reconnection” and visitation with her father. This might sound reasonable enough, but it had been nearly two years after the substantiation, and the child was afraid to go. At handover, she tried a runner. Several burly cops had to bundle the hysterical child into the car. Her mother could do nothing but stand by and watch the traumatic scene unfold.
Proof of a New Injury
After the weekend of her second visitation, the child returned with a large wound. The young lass made up various excuses to different people about the injury (we learn later why), but after about five days opened up and said her father had deliberately hurt her. Her mother made an assault notification to CARL (the Child Abuse Report Line), and was told to go to a doctor and the police.
The young girl then disclosed, to professionals, not to mum, the details of what had actually happened and how she was assaulted, and how she was threatened. (I wish to emphasize that there could not have been any coaching.)
Enter Officer Demeter once AGAIN.
After the notification of the injury, there was an inter-agency meeting. In normal circumstances this is to discuss an immediate investigation strategy — which is clearly outlined in protocols and regulations. But someone from police (SAPOL) fouled up that process. That policeperson had begun fabricating accusations against the mother — making everyone believe that the protective mother was the problem, and that she was suffering delusions.
(But hang on, the earlier investigation and further assessments had cleared the mother of mental health issues, plus the department had deemed the kid safe in her care for the nearly two years after that first investigation.)
I reckon that this “someone from SAPOL” must be Officer “Delay” Demeter. She called the mother a day or so later, saying that she was in charge of the investigation. From that moment Demeter would become an invaluable ally for the abuser in this Second Investigation.
With the reports of this physical injury, all agencies (CPS, DCP, SAPOL) should have been focused on investigating the assault on the child. (Did Demeter persuade department staff that the injury was most likely a fabrication?) However, working against protocol, it appears that all investigations on this were shut down for around 2 weeks or more because of this officer (and this while the wound was slowly healing).
It was a very visible and significant injury, and by now another medical professional (her own doctor) had heard the child’s account — that her father had deliberately injured/assaulted her, and threatened to kill her and her mother should she speak out.
Yet, the girl kept bravely speaking out. (She was extremely traumatized when speaking about this.)
As soon as the abuse notifications/reports got into the system, other notifications “popped” up against the mother’s mental health — a standard ploy to deflect accusations of sexual and physical harm to someone other than the perpetrator.
(The word “notification” can refer to something a mandatory reporter called in, or it could be a family member or a citizen. And Notifications are anonymous, even when they are evidence in a court case.)
But when the mother went into one DCP office, they confirmed that none of the doctor’s notifications about the injury were in the system — but very recent reports claiming her to be a danger were! When the mother challenged Officer Demeter on this, the records miraculously returned. So, was someone fiddling with the system?
The 19-Day Phone Call
In the first few days after the reporting of the injury to CARL, Officer Demeter had visited the mother’s house briefly a few times (for a few minutes each time), confirming that she was once again “in charge” of the investigation. However, she never once asked the child to see the wound. Strange!
After 18 days of no investigation the mother was getting desperate. It was Friday and her daughter was to go back to her father for the weekend, and she didn’t want to go. The mother rang Demeter yet again, saying that she had been to see all the child protection agencies (e.g., CPS, and two DCP offices), and that there was no sign of anyone doing anything. Officer Demeter answers,
Officer – “The issue we have now is that the bruises aren’t there. The photos [taken by a parent from school] don’t show the person who the bruises are on.”
Mother – “The scars, the scars are still blatantly obvious on her [redacted] and the trauma. As the doctor [second doctor] spoke to the child last night…”
Officer (interrupting) – “… initial intake [report] that talks about the bruises said she doesn’t say anything how those bruises were occurred.”
(Let me explain. The bruises are only a minor reflection of what the wound looks like. There are cuts. Also, the initial notification by the mother indicated that the child was deliberately hurt. It was when the girl was taken to various professionals did she provide details of how the injury was inflicted.)
Then, in the 19-day phone call, when the mother questions the the lack information in the system, the officer answers,
Officer – “It’s not a report. I’ve got his–I’ve got your–the doctor’s medical records, and that has nothing to do with the DCP, that was my investigation.” [The mother’s doctor was a woman]
Mother – “But the doctor said you didn’t go and get her [the child’s] medical records…”
Let’s put a pin that conversation for the moment, and focus on “medical records” for a minute. It seems Officer Demeter is not talking about the child’s medical records.
Medical Record Fraud
I will be running the medical record malfeasance matter in a separate article, but it’s worth a mention here. Suspecting that her medical records had been tampered with, even altered, the mother discovered that her medical history/records had been accessed on about 15 suspicious occasions, some after hours and on weekends.
That might not be so worrisome, except that the child had (in her initial interview 2 years previously) identified that her father’s “girlfriend” had also abused her. That girlfriend’s father, who is a doctor, owns the clinic where mum used to go to see her GP. This doctor is the only person who has access to the mother’s records outside of clinic hours.
You couldn’t make this stuff up, not even in an Agatha Christie novel.
It is clear from the phone call with Officer Demeter (which the mother audio-recorded to protect her lawful interests) that she has no police-like interest in following up on the alleged aggravated assault on the child.
Recall, she had said: “…I’ve got his–I’ve got your–the doctor’s medical records, and that has nothing to do with the DCP, that was my investigation.” If the medical records were of the child (and her injury) then it had everything to do with the DCP. But the officer says clearly that the medical records have nothing to do with the DCP — so is she referring to the mother’s medical records? And if so, where did Officer Demeter get these medical records? From the father, from the aforementioned ‘girlfriend’ or her father? And were they obtained illegally? And had these medical records been tampered with?
Who Is Your Manager?
The 19-Day Phone Call Continues.
Officer – “…The issue we’ve got with those photos is that they are not forensic evidence. We haven’t got child protection, um, the forensic doctor, the doctor there taking the forensic photos. The photos with the injuries don’t show [the child] in them, to show that it is [the child] the injuries are on. And now our concern is… [interrupted by mother]
Mother – “…I can get someone to verify that that was [the child] and she’ll do a statement…
They spoke on the phone for some time, but the twisted excuses from the police officer are easily discernible. She has the ability to double-talk her way through the delay tactics of her non-investigation of the assault.
I’ve heard the recording. It’s a gem. Demeter allegedly met with CPS (but didn’t). She also made conflicting statements about knowing about the injury, and whether the DCP were investigating or not.
What Demeter did not tell Mum was that the investigation was not on the child, but now secretly on her. After circling through various excuses, she finally concludes that she is unable to do any further investigation (re: the child) without the authority of her superior, and says,
Officer – “The issue we’ve got is proving any of this [why did she wait 18 days?] … Given what’s happened now in relation to you attended with the photos last night I would need to seek further guidance from my manager before I can make any…”
The mother is quick with her question:
Mother – “Whose your manager?”
Officer – “Sorry?” (She heard the question.)
Mother – “Sorry Demeter, Whose your manager?”
DEAD SILENCE. A LONG PAUSE, and I mean long pause. It takes her 5 full seconds to start saying her manager’s name.
Officer – “Um…eer… Senior Sergeant [REDACTED].
Mother – “Okay.”
Officer – “At…at [station] police.”
It is so obviously a lie — in more ways than one. The name she provides does not ring true.
Colluding with the Abuser
It was sometime later on that Friday — 19 days after the injury was first reported — that the young lass must have told a teacher (as she didn’t want to go to her father’s). It is likely that the school put in a call to CARL. But it is Officer Demeter that went on to interfere, going against crisis care (and the department) demanding that the child be sent home with the father. The school complied. But hours later crisis care intervened and brought the child back to her mother, deeming her safe there.
It was on the Monday that Officer Demeter contacts the school to inquire about the child. The principal informs her that the child was “very happy to go back to her mother” that Friday evening when crisis care removed her from her father’s care.
Now 22 days after the mother reported the assault, and after having done no investigation in the injury, it appears that Officer Demeter goes into damage control for the abuser. She alerts the child protection departments that the psychotic and delusional mother was/is a serious danger. And this, just after learning that the child was “happy” to be back home to her mother.
Someone — it could only be Demeter — made the most detailed and devastating FABRICATED claims against the mother in the reporting system. Having met the mother only a few times, for a few minutes each time, the officer had miraculously become an expert on the minutia of the mother’s life, and her supposed mental health condition.
I speculate the information, and the distortions of her medical history, was all invented with the help of the father. And so it appears that a police officer must have been colluding with the perpetrator to totally fabricate “evidence” (a medical disorder) against a protective parent – without any basis.
Demeter had turned the father’s previously unsubstantiated allegations into fact, delivering a psychiatric opinion that would soon flip the investigation, resulting in the Department for Child Protection removing her child about 2 weeks later.
“Someone” had also removed the red flags from the father’s name — and now later that Monday there were ALERTS against the mother. These alerts had turned a caring and empathetic mother into a DANGEROUS individual — and these fabricated claims became life destroying.
What happened to the real experts — the forensic psychiatrists and esteemed psychologists — that had reported in her favour? Were they cast aside? Despite having passed many mental health assessments, and despite countless detailed and glowing statements declaring she’s an excellent mother, she was declared a danger.
Officer Demeter, having just learned about the loving bond between mother and daughter, then, at some point, launched her nuclear-family bomb. It probably took only two hours on the computer. Now the damage was done, and the child’s life was about to be changed forever.
The Aftermath – Pro Tem
Having stalled, and corrupted two investigations, it seems Demeter had been the principal architect in making all involved believe the mother’s mental health was a grave danger to her child — PLUS, she managed to “bury” the kid’s desperate disclosures.
What is truly shocking is that Demeter had interviewed this child 6 months before, and personally listened to accounts of abuse — some of which the mother had not heard. And despite photos of the wound (good, clear photos), nothing has been done for the now-9-year-old beautiful girl.
Pause to think about that. And no doubt there are many such cases.
I’d say it was thanks to Demeter, that a month after the assault was reported, the department came in and removed the child from her mother. By that time the wound had mostly healed, but no person in authority believed the child anyway.
It is quite unbelievable really that an officer managed to get away with such criminal obstruction. And also by conjuring up psychiatric inventions against a protective parent, she began to destroy the life of a child.
The mother in this case made a complaint to the Office of Police Integrity (ICAC & OPI) about Officer Delay-Demeter. Two PI officers came around just before Christmas 2018 — but they didn’t want more information from her. A few weeks into January 2019, the mother got a call. The Police Integrity office was closing the file. Amen.
The mother has tried to reopened the case against Demeter.
My Call to Officer Demeter
I tracked Officer Demeter down. She answered the phone. I asked whether she knew Senior Sergeant [REDACTED]? (Her manager, remember.) I think I had to repeat the question, but I remember her being stunned at my question. There seemed to be no recall. I asked her whether she had worked with this person, and suggested the person was once her manager. Her vague answer indicated that she had not worked with ‘redacted’. There was no recognition as one would expect.
The brief call confirmed what I thought.
The mother tried an FOI request to get her hands on her daughter’s police interview. The request was refused (by Officer Demeter) — on the basis that Mum is no longer her own daughter’s guardian. Motherhood has no status, it seems.
It seems the child’s discloses are suppressed and sealed. We are talking about two lives being destroyed here, and it appears that long-term care of the child is being planned — keeping the child away from her mother.
The kid loves her mother – hugely. Many have called this Mum the best mother in the suburb. She was a trusted and favourite mum with her kid’s schoolmates. But now the child is to be deprived of Mum’s love and nurturing.
I’d say it is in the public interest that there is a special inquiry on this matter.
Perhaps the best way to launch an investigation would be for a team of protestors to invade Demeter’s police station with disparate-source journalists and private video witnesses, and demand this. But a much simpler versio of the truth would be needed. ie medical description of the injuries, official documents recording the bulleted child’s and mother’s complaints, and the cop’s acts of interference.
I strongly recommend against the more attractive and just resolution, that of simply killing the father and crooked cop LOL.
Where does it end? 40 years ago my life was ruined and my spirit broken (im a warrior now) by 3 women, a coverup and detaining a 15yp (me) in a high security nut house!
Still no laws to hold these “professionals” accountable.
Crazy .. xx
Oh yes there are laws to hold them accountabe. We have all the laws we need.
It’s a of the public getting up off its collective duff. (I don’t mean you, Binnie.)
Sorry, I omitted a word: “It’s a MATTER of the publi…”
Binnie, cover-up of a crime is definitely a crime. See my Gumshoe article on “Accessories.” But in your case it does seem the statute of limitations has run.
One of the Royal Commission’s recommndations is to lift the statute of lims for “historic abuse” cases, and I think some states have already done so. (Of ourse what I said about accessories is relevant to a prosecution, not a lawsuit.)
Dee, have you firmly ascertained that this person is a police officer?
There could be a lot more going on than meets the eye. Why would a SAPOLer want to collude with a perp?
Why would a SAPOLer — or anyone — want to betray a little kid. Pretty wierd stuff.
Excuse me, Dee, I am honestly baffled. If it took her 5 seconds to come up with the name of the “sergeant” and then you later found out that she doesn’t know that sergeant, does that not show that she is a frickin impostor?
Or, during the 5-second pause maybe she was deciding not to name her real supervisor. We all have supervisors, don’t we? Why shouldn’t she just spill his name? Is he in on the funny biusiness too, and she has to protect him?
Mary, surely there’s a way to go to the workplace and determine if female officer [no-name] is a legitimate police-officer there. That should be public knowledge, in the service of preventing people from impersonating police for nefarious purposes. At least in NSW, it’s absolutely legit to demand to know the name of any officer’s immediate supervisor, even from a third-party police officer, as it is in the US. I think the guy in charge of the original clinic might be a good lead to pursue as well.
Pursue in what way?
Another ‘dirty’ cop, who would have thought.
I’ve never had any serious cases in the field of child protection, but I had a few doozies with police corruption and the drug trade. What you’ve described is consistent with my experiences in the areas that I’ve dealt with.
Trying to keep your client out of gaol while the Police are fabricating evidence, destroying evidence, threatening witnesses, threatening me, etc. etc. – the average citizen wouldn’t believe it.
Everyone that reads your article should substitute themselves for the mother in the article – because they just might be in that position in the future.
Would this be a one off case? What if this crooked cop is helping other deranged assaulters who may be from elitist positions in society? No-one is investigating this incidence, why?
Is someone else in SAPOL making sure there is no inquiry into this case? Why? May be to cover up, many other criminal offences by untouchables in our society.
“Would this be a one off case?” – Hell no, there’s way too much evidence to show this is something that is ongoing.
So, what’s in it for her? I don’t know, but in the drug cases I was involved with the Police were making some big bucks (importation, distribution). Even in smaller cases where there wasn’t a big payoff, the culture was such that they all shared whatever they could get away with – like it was part of the job.
Is she getting her cut? I don’t know, she could just be a ‘soldier’ doing her job in the system as she sees it. Someone up the chain puts in a request to ‘disappear’ some evidence and she goes along with it.
It looks like SA’s Police Integrity Commission may be corrupt as well since they didn’t follow up on anything (although from one of my experiences that may be a ruse to not let the bad-guys catch on to what is really going down).
The pursuit of justice should not be this complicated… Tony Ryan’s last comment should be taken as a joke, you don’t kill them, you ‘disappear’ them (“I don’t know, she never showed up for her shift??”)
Surely the SAPOL integrity people report to someone further up. Who would that be? The police minister? It seems the mother has a legitimate issue with the integrity people, in addition to the other players.
SAPOL senior constable pay runs from $79K to $92K, and Senior Sergeant Redacted gts a minimum of $115K.
You really have to see the photo on this page:
https://www.police.sa.gov.au/join-us/achievemore/police-officer-careers/working-as-a-police-officer/career-progression-and-salaries
Dee, my comment was posted, but after I closed and came back, it is missing.
At the time Mary’s second comment was posted, but that too is now missing.
I usually wait 24 hours before reposting, to see if it is truly lost.
Dee, ignore my last comment. Somehow both those previous comments are now visible.
Regarding a Police career, I believe in Western Australia, it is a must that once you become a sergeant you must also become a Freemason. ????? Dangerous stuff!
I would say they are basically the Deep State.
This has many similarities with my case where the abusive parent does a deal with the DCP which selected police will back up and the family court seals it resulting with the child ending up in the pedo industry
I have spoken to Dee a few times about this ongoing perversion of justice and a child’s interest.
I have been informed of the style and degree of the injury alleged. Think ‘scalpel'(?)
This article should be sent to every member of the SA state parliament and to some selected media outlets for a wide public dessemination.
Prima facie, every decent SA police officer should stand up for their decent colleagues, as the report brings into disrepute the whole of the SA police department.
How can any thinking member of the public have any confidence in the SA police department?
The police Commissioner must act on these allegations with a full inquiry, if any officers with integrity can be found for the investigation.
The SA Minister for the police department should carpet the Police Commissione immediately otherwise how could the SA Premier and cabinet colleagues have any confidence in the Police Minister and indeed, how could the SA decent public have any confidence in the SA government?
If the SA parliamentary opposition does not pull their fingers out (think scalpel?) THEY ARE DISPICABLE.
WE AWAIT A FULL INVESTIGATION BY A OUT OF STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE AND THE FUNDING OF THE MOTHER FOR HER CHOICE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION FOR HERSELF AND SEPARATELY FOR THE CHILD.
NOTHING LESS WOULD BE SATISFACTORY.
We await for the response.
And include the previous report here at gs by Dee on the dodgy identification lanyard and id presented to the mother during a access visit supervised by someone with the dodgy id.
As a note: three barristers have commented above.
Apologies two. I received an email from a third
Dee, could you please contact me when you have time
If only more legal people knew of this site and Dee’s reporting.
But three is a start.
Now for the community to be informed and our polictians to come on board and justify; their salaries, sad public status and regain public confidence.
Otherwise, why should they be there?
Otherwise they are frauds, just like the bankers and itinerent toilet brush door to door sales spivs.
A truly heart-wrenching article, Dee. SAPOL should be SADPOL.. in need of a thorough clean out for for a LONG LONG time! Do we need to follow the money, or the drugs? As Ned says, the polis need to justify their (ridiculous) salaries – DO SOMETHING!! I say, toilet brush the whole system, preferably with ‘drano’!
It has affected me deeply
Strength to you Dee
CRIMINAL LAW CONSOLIDATION ACT 1935 – SECT 251 [South Australia] 251—Abuse of public office
(1) A public officer who improperly—(a) exercises power or influence that the public officer has by virtue of his or her public office; or
(b) refuses or fails to discharge or perform an official duty or function; or
(c) uses information that the public officer has gained by virtue of his or her public office,
with the intention of—
(d) securing a benefit for himself or herself or for another person; or(e) causing injury or detriment to another person,
is guilty of an offence. [The penalty is 7 years.]
Dee, the title of your article is “Removal…traced to cop.” If proven, I suppose that invokes 1(a) “exercises power” but to be indictable she would have to also “have the intention of” D or E.
Ah, I see that D does not demand that she get money, if she secures a benefit for herself OR FOR ANOTHER PERSON.
Now let’s imagine she gets indicted (I realize that is a stretch), she could claim duress if “someone else” is forcing her to do it.
Barristers, I am thinking of the scene of the burly cops bundling a screaming 7-year-old into a car. (Or even skinny cops, what’s the diff). A passerby in Adelaide would think, Wow is that kid being arrested for shop-lifting, or what.
Does the cop come under any law here? He is terrifying the child. He is also leading her into a bad situation. If she has committed a crime, the cop can use reasonable force. What if there is no crime alleged?
And why doesn’t this child have a say in the matter?
For many years I have suggested that there be a independent site to record ALL correspondence (by consent) sent to our parliamentary servants and their response logged. If any?
A small fee would be charged to log the letter, say $2.00 and the webmaster would edit letters and any response under subjects.
By this democratic avenue the public would be able to have recorded their interests etc. and the public would be able to assess their political response, if any.
There are numerous antedoctal reports of our paid representative just ignoring correspondence by their employers.
Such a site would simply record correspondence in to pollies and their response..
Simple idea, someone could make a motza from the silent majority!
If all correspondence to pollies is logged,
God help the pollies. Stiff! Do your job represent those who pay for you lot.
Brilliant idea.
(I think comments got lost during the “glitch”)
Great idea Ned. Hell, I have had so much correspondence with various ‘authorities’, civil rights groups, media and others over the years that it would be a fairly thick book. I can imagine different chapters would have to be arranged the keep tabs on all the different topics.
Hmm, the replies I received wouldn’t even warrant a few pages, funny about that…
However, the lack of a response is telling in itself. Imagine hundreds of concerned citizens writing detailed letters – and absolute silence from the ‘authority’. After a while a person could perceive a pattern emerge of knowledge and complicity – and it has been documented.
No more denial, no more smoke and mirrors.
And the msm would go crazy as it would not be able to; cherry pick, censor and control their agendas as they do with letters to the editors.
And the pollies? Well, they would either, have to think, respond and inform or go play upturned turtle on a turtle fence post and rot in the sun.
Sorry about the ‘.y” : typo!
For those who do not know what a ‘post turtle’ is:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/4fqjtm/post_turtles/
A protected species commonly found on parliamentary fence posts.
“and control their agendas as they do with letters to the editors.” – LOL!
I have sent a number of requests to contact the author of a letter to the editor, it was always ignored. I STRONGLY suggest that the letters were a ‘Dorthy Dix’ to string along the public.
If anyone thinks some ‘letter to the editor’ sounds fishy or is spouting BS, just contact the paper and ask to contact the author. Be nice, even when they refuse to respond. Just chalk it up to a ‘gotcha!’.
Oh, I should add, before I sent my requests I always checked the person’s name and suburb FIRST, to see if such a person existed. When I ALWAYS came up blank, then I contacted the paper.
It would seem that a site with a section logging correspondence to pollies and replies etc must be independent from msm control.
Dee, you busy lately? ( just joking)
Terry?
There could be a separate sub group called ‘Terry’s Corner’ for certain correspondence to be posted.
‘Unpublished letters to the Editors’.
😂😂😂😂😂
‘
30 years ago a complaint to a Minister would elicit a full response that bore his or her name and signature and the standard time-frame was 2 weeks. These days you’re lucky to get any sort of feedback within 2 months and it’s either authored by a lackey, or worse still some bureaucrat employed by the offending Department.
My reply to the latter is always “I’m in receipt of your letter dated XXX. I trust you’re aware that it’s legally nul and void.”
I think the situation is a fair indication of the extent to which the system has fallen into decay.
4 years ago I was actually given confirmation that the signature of the WA AG had been put to a series of letters written by the head of the Court Registry under fire.
The corresponding complaint was based on the fact that some clerk had filed a certain case by way of violating prescribed restrictions and requirements, which, of course, meant that said case had zero legal status(“Act binds the Crown”).
I’ve seen the same thing played out over and over again. Unfortunately most people don’t understand that related attacks by government henchmen can be countermanded simply by calling the bluff
“He reveals the deep things of darkness and brings utter darkness into the light. “ JOB 12: 22
I take it that there is a delay for comment. I record that I await.
ACCOUNT SUSPENDED ON SEVERAL PLATFORMS… trying to work with hosts security team
October 13, 2014 11:09am
SIX SA police officers, including a sergeant, have been arrested and will be charged with abuse of public office and with allegedly stealing items including booze, tools and electrical goods in new Independent Commission Against Corruption’s first bust since being set up last year.
Message DON’T STEAL BOOZE
Message: Now that they have done their first bust, and learned how to fill out the paperwork, they can do their second.
I recommend they bust Ms Delay DeRigueur. If she is not available (as in she is in Fiji), let them go after the Burly Boys. Or the Christmas Eve boys.
I can help! I’ll fill out the forms. Use me, use me!
And I don’t need $79Kpa. I’ll do it for a flat rate — 35 dollars AUD, per bust.
How do I do it? Volume!
Further to Binnie, above. The arrest of Russell Pridgeon, Patrick O’Dea and others is a crime. One hardly needs to say that arresting someone for purposes of intimidating others is “not on.”
.
What a scream! At 1.01 minutes the maker of the above film (Dee) shot the other media cameramen. Four of them. But did they ever publish Russell’s speech?
They bothered to be there. They filmed the speech. Did their master tell them to suppress it? If so, why? It’s a faily newsworthy event, isn’t it?
I think “court-ordered sexual abuse” is quite the catchy phrase — he uses it several ties.
Re the last 2 paragraphs of the section headed “Father Points Blame at Mother”:
Did she affirm what she’d been told in a letter to the Po Superintendent or anyone else? Did she ask the officer concerned to put the turn of events in writing together with written reasons ? Has she sworn a corresponding statement?
Generally speaking men are naturally better at self-defence than women, hence the current feminisation of society.
Seeing my “friendly”(vulnerable to predation) hens & “hostile”(watchman/scout) rooster is always a beneficial reminder. Good thing humans aren’t totally bound by Mother Nature like so.
This was a discovery much later. Much of the evidence of mental health is not revealed to the person.
I don’t know how many psychiatrists I have cross-examined, but I consider most of them as on the level of Paul Mullen. Liars for hire.
I could always find another psychiatrist as an ‘expert witness’ that would refute the other psychiatrist – got the money, you got the report.
I remember when I was running ‘group sessions’ for Vietnam Veterans with PTSD and some school trained wonk would sit in and disrupt the flow of the group. I would basically tell them to shut up. That caused some friction and they were more than glad for me to finally move on to other things.
I would recommend that no one should ever be ‘examined’ by some court appointed psychiatrist.
Psychiatry (or psychology) is not a true science.
“And Notifications are anonymous, even when they are evidence in a court case.)”
How is this a thing? I thought one should always be able to face their accuser in the courts.
I remember reading a link provided by a commenter, about marriage licences. Originally they were made to allow interracial marriages. But apparently when you get one The State now owns you And Your Children produced by said marriage. I assume this was in the USA, but it’s funny how these things seep into the rest of the world.
And I still ask: Does a transaction take place when someone reports an abused child to Child Protective Services (or equivalent?)
Marriage licencing is really nothing more than a means of branding cattle. For anyone who hadn’t already twigged that’s why the Fat Controllers are so pro gay marriage. Anyone in any sort of liason that isn’t under their greasy mitts is simply deemed a threat.
If I’d had a bit more insight prior to having kids I would never have registered them at birth; that really is the root of the abuse issue. The requirement is on a par with gun registration: The crims don’t do it so it really isn’t about anything more than keeping tabs on law-abiding citizens.
In WA the penalty for non-compliance is a measly $1000(I think a child is worth a bit more than that!) It probably wouldn’t be a bad idea to inform the State Governor in advance & provide written reasons. The response would no doubt amount to nothing more than pompous irrelevant drivel but that would probably do the trick so far as warding off potential harrasers
But I don’t think there’s any full proof formula for salvation. Everyone has different capabilities. It’s really a matter of learning how to perfect strength in weaknesses( 2 Corinthians 12: 9)
Corruption is engraved in the policy of Oz , ever since the penal colony was established .
Tptb (IZCS) have been grooming the ccp , for the past seventy years , and now they’re
global monster is occupying the world . In the party , corruption is a way of life , and
outsiders are on $10/day if they have a job . They have been fashioned in their handlers image.
Here corruption rules . Communism was never dismantled , they’re elite just moved to the wild west and are now fleecing as they are trained to do . All done according to plan . The phoenix has risen , to the detriment of Godness in humanity . Our children’s future jeopardised by the corrupting evil that enslaves all .
If we had said to our grandparents , that this was the near future , they would have dismissed it as impossible . In they’re time , there were no computers on phones , look at us now – 5G is here along with perpetual wars debt and we are the terrorists . This artificial world is so screwed up (order out of chaos ) . To awaken , go out and see the real world of Creation . Don’t let their lies get us down ,
remember His love is in every beating heart and that is where the Soul resides .
Dee, that was a stunning read. I to, with what hope I have left,desire so much to also expose “Criminal Activity” that gives birth to corruption that has destroyed many lives, but, unlike the husband in this story, I have never been Questioned by any law, nor face a judge to obtain any convictions to abuse to children, yet, by the greater powers of the child safety system, they came and destroyed lives, the children, the mothers and myself. I have not see any of them, have no clue to them, that abuse kills me everyday…
And I really do wish I could find a ‘Matlock” type lawyer.
Thank you, Doc. Yes it is a stunning read. Maybe Dee could start a whole new “Matlock” career:
.
In my dreams and in my nightmares, I have a “Matlock” and even a “Judge Judy”, I obtain Justice, I find happiness. But!!! reality is the nightmare, Ive waited and Ive waited, not wanting to commit a crime to the abuse I had to endure to be heard to why I am abused, Suicide is no longer a option.
This country has proven it will destroy life to protect the corruption.
I just wish there was a lawyer out there, that is more of a human that believes in justice and save lives of innocence.
If Dee did that, I be at her feet begging……
If you want to hear about similar cases inc my own contact me..inc my own story and its a doozy, facs hiding abuse in care, wrongful remival and supporting a DV perp
The court systems here are beyond tragic . Although I haven’t experienced family courts ,can sympathise with victims of just ice . Belief in honesty and integrity is shattered after thinking that,
by going to court , matters will be resolved fairly , Nothing could be further from the truth .
In building , I supplied toils and materials , for free . Won two court cases , never saw the money , still had to pay legal costs of 100k added to the money owed to me . The man that did this is a multi millionaire and I’m still paying his debt . Avoid courts at all costs !
A terrible and despicable corrupt system! That poor poor child…and her mother
The question is why would this female police assist the father who is the abuser?
Yes I had a very good friend who was a good detective who quit the police because of corruption as he was in he drug and vice squad. There is far too much corruption and crime in the police. Remember the freemasons are involved not only in the police but in the military.
Thirty years ago Fitzgerald burst the can of worms wide open to corruption that is still rife today in Queensland and now that I have been entrap by the system, I now see in full swing that corruption, as that corruption came into my life and murdered it, I saw to how documents can be fabricated to be made the truth by this corruption, I saw to how many humans that knows all about this corruption and the abuse that the child safety/Family court does does and they turn their backs and avoid it, thus making them just as guilty.
I saw to how churches will close all doors, when seeking assistance in this matter.
I saw so many people protecting the system of child safety, including lawyers,police,media, so, how the hell do I know, to when I am begging for assistance that the person I am communicating with, isnt a pedo, or will protect the system of child safety due to maybe having a family member in there or maybe a lover/friend, as i encounter this at a community legal centre when I try to be in a court of law.
In my hell of misery, I bury myself in a dead house and play online games, such as World of Warships, there, I have communicated with people I play with in a clan, they live in the US of A, I inform them of my issues and to how Australia has become, they cant believe to what I am saying, until I prove it to them, they then tell me, lawyers in America will break my legs to get me in a court room,as these lawyers love to take the government on, they say, I need to get out of this country, and I agree, I hate this country to what it did to me, I hate the people that turn their backs to innocence in this country, but be a nobody and a nothing with no meaning or purpose, Im stunk in this sick corrupted country, there is no escape from the many hells I live in…………….
i believe it all. 7 months of hell my family have been put thru. the perp, oh hes sitting pretty dont you worry. hes staying in jail so hes safe. DCP and Sapol destroyed our lives
[…] that I wrote about a corrupt police officer in South Australia in 2017 and 2018 (“Officer Demeter”). The BBC article is writing […]
[…] June (2019) I wrote about a corrupt cop in an article called, “Removal of Child from Good Mum Traceable to Corrupt Female Police Officer.” A police […]
[…] in this case, but “abduction”. I wrote about the offending police officer in June 2019, in an article entitled, “Removal of Child from Good Mum Traceable to Corrupt Female Police Officer”. I referred to her […]
[…] have written much about this police officer. In June 2019, in an article entitled, “Removal of Child from Good Mum Traceable to Corrupt Female Police Officer” I began to piece […]