Home Trump Required — Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Officer/s

Required — Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Officer/s

16

Introduction by Dee McLachlan, and analysis by G5

An article by Daisy Luther via The Organic prepper blog entitled “Why Is The UN Hiring English-Speaking Disarmament Officers In New York?” has been picked up by many sites across the internet, claiming another “crazy conspiracy theory” has turned out to be true.

The article about the United Nations hiring a Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Officer in New York is splattered across the Alternative media — from Activistpost, to Infowars, Zerohedge to sgtreport. It is about a job posting the day after Christmas.

But I have found countless ads for the same or similar posting. In fact, an almost identical ad went out on 8 August 2017 for a Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Officer.

Ms Daisy Luther writes,

Is this in response to the Virginia crisis?

“…Citizens of Virginia have become outraged recently by new laws that are likely to pass this month, effectively banning all semi-automatic weapons. Sanctuary counties, cities, and municipalities now cover all but the most urban parts of the state. These sanctuaries have vowed to support the Second Amendment and are refusing to enforce unconstitutional gun laws.

“In response, a member of the state congress suggested that Governor Northam could call up the National Guard to disarm residents of Virginia despite the wishes of local governments. In response to that, at least one county has formed a militia and others are expected to spring up. The state’s Attorney General says that these sanctuaries carry no legal weight.

“…One has to wonder if this is why the UN is hiring “disarmament officers?” (See here for the job description)

And now for a correspondence from G5:

The UN or NATO might act to contravene The US Constitution. It sounds like an invasion with attempted regime change.

The NRA versus the UN or NATO in the streets of the US — which is confirmation of the reason for the 2nd Amendment. Would The UNSC approve that without a US Veto? I suggest that The AltMedia Pundits have yet again — ad nauseam — verified their Expertism.

What are the size of these intended invasionary forces?

If the Bear, with virtually no effort, has paralyzed NATO on some nine occasions in the contemporary (loitering its borders), I doubt if any, well in advance known by Intel, engagement, would ever occur across the big wash. Particularly when the US is NATO’s biggest feeders.

And then there is that hidden secret that the US is unable to legally sell, or legally approve the sale of its weaponry — without maintaining total control. Recall the missiles fired by Iraq against Israel towards the end of the Second US Invasion of Iraq (prior to the US Food For Oil Genocide).

The Poroshenko Kerch Strait Rubber Ducky Affair of desperation was funny. Dressed in his battle fatigues, ‘The Russians are Coming.’

No foreign forces, however badged, can walk US streets.

The notion of an ‘other’ intervening in the US has been mooted a number of times. It’s ad hoc elaboration and embellishment leading to entertainment. Russia and China have interests to protect their US enslaved consumers and their biggest trading host.

If False Flags and Hoaxes are so easily sucked in by the hordes, how easy would it be for US Propaganda to spin 180 against NATO or the UN. And how many minutes would such ‘forces’ exist in the real world of being stranded in the cold. The joke concerning NATO is 30 minutes to an hour — depending on the appetite of The Bear at a particular time.

Were the Dem Party to invite and play a foreign power to act against the US Constitution, such a hypothetical would end in a swift and very tragic outcome. It would lead to Trump retiring the Constitutional Succession and Election Rules, invoking an overt Martial Law, National Security, and Emergency stance and camping in the WH indefinitely, as Dems, Deep State, and Liberals are flushed out in the biggest US delousing in history.

 

SHARE

16 COMMENTS

  1. Dee, this subject merits a lot of discussion. For the moment I only want to point out that the “job ad” for the demob persons is unjobs-dot-org. It would be “dot.gov” or “dot.mil” if coming from an official source.

  3. Its allegedly a UN job, so it wouldn’t be a .gov or .mil job. It may be for disarmament officers for South America. I remember during the Christchurch massacre hype that ((they)) brought Rebecca Peters back from some South American sh!thole (I think it was Guatemala) to waffle on about how well gun control worked in Australia.

    I just find it difficult to imagine a bunch of powder blue helmets walking down the main street of Deplorable, USA, telling people to hand in their firearms. The deplorables would likely end up fighting over who got the pretty powder blue helmets.

    Disarmament of the people in the U.S. would be magnitudes more difficult that Oz or NZ. The people over in the U.S. fought a revolution for their freedom, they have been brought up with that heritage, they have the 2nd amendment – any blue helmeted clown showing up would be on a suicide mission. Ozzies and Kiwis will roll over to please a bureaucrat, it is still in their blood from being a colony and never breaking free.

    • I mentioned in an earlier thread about the Kiwis reaction to the Christchurch massacre. Here’s a copy from a post I sent to someone in the U.S. – compare the Kiwi response to the Yank response to tyranny –

      This is my first post on the forum. I was looking for a thread where the actual events of the massacre were discussed, I couldn’t find one, so I chose this thread to bring it up. I live in Australia and was able to view the shooter’s video. Here are some of my observations –

      This massacre was DEFINITELY NOT a lone gunman shooting. At least three times Tarrant takes off running to shoot people that were not within his line of sight. He was working with others.

      The first time that I could see was when he runs out the front of the Mosque, turns and points his rifle at a parked car, apparently recognizes the people, does not shoot but continues to run out to the sidewalk and then shoot at a fleeing person that is down the street.

      That parked car is important. License number FQH875, as it leaves during the massacre and then is filmed later being flagged through a Police roadblock.

      The second time he gets instructions was when he was out at his car getting petrol out of the boot. He drops what he is doing and runs up the alley, turns around the wall and goes to shoot people in the FAR corner of the compound.

      The third time he gets instructions is when he is back in the Mosque, then runs up the hall and out onto the sidewalk to shoot at two women. One of the women is killed and the other escapes.

      What is important in this sequence is that the video shows that there is a man dressed all in red standing in the compound watching the massacre. Tarrant looked at him and did not shoot at him, he went after the women. Those two women likely ran past that man in red while trying to escape. The surviving woman could confirm the existence of the man in red at a Royal Commission.

      My question is, why aren’t you Kiwis asking questions about this?

      Originally Posted by Terry in Oz
      I should mention that I’m a retired barrister in Oz. I did a lot of research on the Port Arthur Massacre (Bryant’s innocent). I also helped a director/producer with a short 10 minute video on the massacre.

      https://gumshoenews.com/2019/03/31/j…lucky-country/

      After you watch the video, read the comments. The second comment is mine and contains a scene from the rough draft screenplay that I wrote for Dee to understand the evidence of the massacre. There is a reference to the Aramoana massacre in that scene that you may find of interest.

      A reply –
      Honestly are you a sandwich short of a Picnic . That video has to be the utter load of complete tripe . I could point you to any number of crims who found standing over a murdered person covered in blood would swear back and blue it wasn’t me , I wasn’t there .
      PEDDLE YOUR BULLSHIT SOMEWHERE ELSE .

      Another reply –
      I have also seen the video and you my friend are full of shit

      We get a few international eedjits telling us what to do but they are usually paranoid nutjobs from the States – maybe you are from Oz, maybe not. You might have read law for 6 months before dropping out of varsity do do heroin, you might be a barrister or even a QC

      but I doubt it

      Another reply –
      Also for anyone who actually HAS read the so-called “manifesto” they will know that it is also a load of utter tripe that is part Incel and part copy pasted racist garbage like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion – it’s not even original bullshit, it’s all recycled

      The real question remains the same as it ever was – how was Tarrant allowed to get a license?

      You’re a retired barrister? I’m the Christmas Tree Fairy, sunshine..

      My reply, and good bye –
      It was suggested that I introduce myself in the Introductions page. I did so. If anyone of you had looked at the introduction you would have found one of the articles I wrote – https://gumshoenews.com/2018/06/19/r…d-its-decline/

      Good luck..

  5. Here’s a new video from Max Igun –

    I couldn’t view that video without feeling angry. Max mentions the disarmament agenda in Australia in conjunction with other things that have been going on.

    As he says, what is it that will get Ozzies mad enough to do something about all this corruption?

  7. “Still a very long way to go.” ???
    What does Scott mean with these concluding words in latest media speech?

    ADF reserves called in cause most are in Middle East. The rains will come, but the damage has been done. Wonder if Scott will part with some of his quarter billion to uninsured homeless survivors?
    These fires are unprecedented, accelerated by decades of chemtrails. To all Freemasons involved, you are a disgrace to all inhabitants of this land.
    Unique wildlife and rainforests torched- genocide.

  8. Re the Christchurch Massacre Hoax, Terry seems to have outed himself. Terry tells us he has “viewed the video”, but has somehow failed to see that there was zero damage to walls or windows, no real blood, cartridges disappearing mid air, fires rifle through windscreen but no holes, crisis actors playing dead in 2nd. mosque while talking on phones then walking away, utterly unbelievable crISISs actor witnesses interviewed by the MSM. etc. etc.
    All this, you can see for yourself folks, not on YouTube of course, but take your pick –
    Archive.org Bitchute Renegade Tribune etc. Just make sure you include HOAX into your search.
    The staged event production is so incredibly bad and obviously fake, no wonder (((they))) have gone to great extremes to wipe it off the internet

  10. Good on you Terry, now you have also outed Max Igan. In his video he says “no need to watch the full footage” about 16 mins. then presents blurry frames and tries unsuccessfully to cover up the fakeness for three quarters of an hour. He is confirming himself as a ‘Deep State Mole’, digging an even deeper hole.
    I stand by my previous comment, blanks, CGI, no real blood, crISIS actors everywhere, especially at Linwood Mosque.
    Don’t take my word for it, search for New Zealand Mosque Shooting Hoax timetounite.com for full footage and other vids and analysis.

  11. He’s using the highest definition video that was available on the ‘net. He said “no need to watch the full footage” in regards to Tarrant filming himself driving around (which is just time consuming). He has shown that Tarrant had real live ammunition by pausing the video for the view on the top of the magazine which showed real rounds, not blanks. He showed the blood splatter on the wall when the bloke got hit in the head and his hat flew off.

    Thankfully, others can view Max’s video, now that you have thoughtfully brought it to their attention.

    Here’s a website you may wish to visit. It will help you understand why you can’t see the obvious. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

  12. Good work Terry, you have ‘outed’ yourself yet again. Any rational anti Zionist has worked out the fact that Wikipedia is (((controlled))) . Here’s a website people may wish to visit to help them understand why you and Max are working to try to cover up the obvious.
    wikispooks.com/wiki/Wikipedia/hasbara

C'mon Leave a Reply, Debate and Add to the Discussion

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.